I think Iamaphoney is trying to tell us that he invented the OTO (the Ordo Templi Orientis) Aleister Crowley's occult organization and that those poses in Help! are actually occult ritual poses he created. I'm not sure what the fake photos of John's death mean. But I'd really like to know what that glowing cocoon was.
okay so the RUMOR says that william campbell said he'd be resurrected in 20 years. the rumor said that paul died in 66. that's 19 years. and they started recording 12 days after the alleged "death". they found a replacement in 12 days?
Used to be an interessting series up untill 20 but has gone downhill since then. Too much of the same points over and over again. And what's teh point of comparing a Crowley pose (stretched arms) with the poses of the Beatles on Help! Help was from 1965 and Paul only would have died in the fall of 1966.
Faul's overblown sense of self-importance here is funny. Stupid rock stars sounding off about the state of society and politics as if they were ever something other than useful idiots for the far-left. And in the case of The BeaTles, Tavistock puppets and Establishment occultists.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Once again, you are merely making several blanket statements without providing any evidence. You see, anybody who is interested in making a serious argument doesn't just spin comments from their heads - they actually have to base their claims in reality, namely a documentary or historical record.
omg... WTH does it matter if he's dead or not!!?? Even if he is dead (what I strongly doubt) what is the point of placing 'evidence' on youtube, if you wanna be sure go hack the pentagon or something in that direction O.o
what about pauls brother mike who used to perform with scaffold surely if there was a conspiracy to replace a dead paul mccartney then surely he would have known so too would all the rest of pauls family for god sake dont bullshit us no longer its doing my fucking head in even my son who is ten is confused if you solid evidence put us all out of our misery for fuck sake
Note that George Harrison--lead guitarist--is wearing a top hat on the cover of HELP! What guitar hero would wear a top hat twenty-two years later.
Slash.
What connection might Slash have with the Beatles? Not much direct connection, but type in MTV Awards 1995 here in Youtube's search engine and see that there's a link between him and "the man with the foolish grin."
Oh shit, I read your comment as "Pre-colour 1966 photos" Hilarion. Sorry about that little mistake. Still, my point about missing eye colour still stands.
This is my last comment, I won`t be able to come back here for some time. For anyone who is interested look into Jane Asher and why she has never spoken of her split from "Paul McCartney" in 1968. They were engaged to be married and she is one of the few women from this period of the Beatles who refuses to speak about this time.
She did make an announcement in 1968. Still, her silence is not evidence. Interesting that you can not find a quotation from anyone in a position to know if Paul was replaced to corroborate your claims (including Jane Asher's brother who categorically denied the PID rumor after their split). As a result your only recourse is to interpret what was not said, since you have nobody saying anything. You can't say that a lack of evidence is actually evidence. That's just poor logic.
I've recently wondered if Derren Brown could be behind all this. I doubt he is but the whole concept of 'iamaphoney' and how it has developed over the months reminds me of one of his elaborate mind control stunts. I have no doubt he could pull this off.
Mmm...having thought about it I concede the comment about Derren Brown lacks foundation but then so does your apparent certainty that I've been 'mind controlled my whole life'. I take it you're immune to such things, then.
No I appreciate your honesty, we`re all under some form of programming/mind control - why is so much money spent on advertising/marketing every year. Hundreds of millions also spent on political campaigns, guess they they just want to give us a hand making up our minds.
See the problem here is we have a few people who have alot more knowledge and put in more time than many others - like being in second or third year of college. Then some arrogant first year git like JGuildersleeve wants the second years to not only sit his exams but to pay his fees for the year. Gimme evidence, spoonfeed me cause I`m a lazy shit and I think you`re all conspiracy freaks - WIll YOU FUCK OFF UP TO URE ROOM AND STUDY URE RES IPSA LOQUITUR!
In any field, it doesn't matter what it is, claims need to be backed up with evidence. That you reduce what is necessary everywhere else as "spoonfeeding" shows how utterly incapable you are of reinforcing your own points. A scientist doesn't just make a claim and tell everyone else to re-affirm his claim for him by searching for their own evidence. A lawyer doesn't just tell a jury the crime and force them to go out and look for evidence. They are required to be responsible for their claims.
I completely disagree, I have no interest in leading the blind - When the pupil is ready the master will appear. You are not yet ready to see or hear - to even bring PID into the criminal field shows you have obviously no idea yet how deep this whole scenario goes. Go away now and do your homework like a good lad........ know when it`s over your head and just go and research...........off with you now, and bring all those other geniuses with you who don`t believe in proper research!
Nobody who considers themselves above the kind of proof that is required everywhere else in the real world is serious about their claims. It is the distinction between petty amateurish postering and somebody who is capable of making serious arguments.
See this is what I have to put up with - one guy who speaks of argumentation as if it`s some godly gift from the renaissance and who refuses to investigate anything outside of his "real world". The other (bluefinger) who lords a second rate illusionist like Derren Brown. The real magician here is the one who has fooled more people, like you two, for over 42 years. As they say if you want to hide something from people put it in front of them, call it something else and they`ll never see it!
I speak of the standard of proof that is required in every field where argumentation is used. That you do not take this basic requirement seriously shows how serious your argument is. The fact that you do not even verify your own examples (hazel eyes) shows how willing you are to live in a fantasy world rather than reality.
I have a simple one for you here JGuildersleeve - I`m sure you`re well aware by now that Paul McCartney has dark brown (hazel) eyes - just examine pre-1966 colour photos and anything recent. NOW, go to the "Hey Jude" video and ask yourself why McCartney (camera is in his face early on) has green eyes in this video?
Also, if they conspiracy is massive enough to involve Aleister Crowley, UFOs, JFK's assassination, Nazi Germany, John Lennon's murder, and bring in hundreds of people and keep them silent, then how in the hell did they miss such a glaring error as eye color?
Can you explain what you mean when you say that "'The 60's' was a communist production"? Was the US attack on South Vietnam "a communist production"? Was the homefront reaction to it "a communist production"? I'm unclear on your terminology.
I don't. Hegel died before the Communist Manifesto was written, and before Nazism flourished. Perhaps if you were less vague in your points, they would be easier to understand. TO simply has a long history of commenting on things he doesn't understand (see the history in IAAP's comment section).
Go to any website of your choosing on eye color and they will tell you that Hazel eyes more than any other color are more likely than others to shift in color mostly due to lighting (ex. intense studio lighting) from brown to green. So, for example, in Hey Jude his eyes are more green (although certainly brownish at times) and in Fool on the Hill they are a more darker brown. This is all very common with hazel eyes and anybody who has seriously studied this issue would know that.
Also, you must have some sort of gay grudge by following me everywhere. I'm not your type, either as fag or as arrogant egomaniac with a God complex who suffers from the delusion that he is the sole arbiter of "scientific proof" in the universe.
You're not even original, just like every other denier-troll:
1) Demand "evidence" while falsely describing truth-tellers, in a mocking arrogant tone.
2) Deny and dismiss any evidence presented, repeat rest of above.
You're painfully unaware that you have an extreme, arrogant tone which comes over claarly to me and everyone, that you have some kind of God complex. There is no proof bar that verified by you. Wouldn't be so bad if you were actually "scientific" (as is your fetish) but you're not. Other trolls know when they are pretending to demand "evidence" that they are just pretending and when they deny, dismiss, deny it is only for effect (to make it LOOK as though they've "won"). You believe your BS. LOL
This overblown, pompous creature styles itslef as a "scintific" intellectual (as all denier trolls on PID, 9/11 truth threads do, been there, seen that).
He's singing to Paul IMO. May Pang said once on a usenet post that Boogaloo was part of a "war" going on among the Beatles at the time. "Don't pretend that you're dead" is very telling... Think about it..
In 1974 they were both still (allegedly) alive, but it makes no sense that John would be the one being addressed here. Furthermore, I'd wager John wrote that song for Ringo in the first place..
It also insinuates that the original Paul's head may have been made out of beef or possibly pork. Is it possible that "A Taste of Honey" from the PPM album could be a hint of the glaze used to coat Paul's delicious head? I know it's a cover but they must have been some reason why they chose that particular song. We may be through the looking glass on this one. Just thinking out loud here.
Whoa - just thought of a few things. The first US Beatles album was called Meet The Beatles (Meat The Beatles???), possibly a clue to the American market re: Paul's head. And, of course, the biggest clue of all, the famous covered-up Beatles photo featuring of all things, headless babies and SLABS OF MEAT!!!! Lennon sang "I been to Meat City". No doubt he had.
He hasn't even bothered to read up on this topic that's why he makes silly over-the-top statements like "not a shred of evidence" (because evidence always comes in shreds).
Even if McCartney submitted his DNA for independent testing and it came up positive some of these pid people would still say it was faked. So, there's really no point in arguing about any of this - but it is fun.
And don't make grand assumptions about DNA challenge tests, bluffer, it'll never happen and we all know why.
But you're right, after lying to the world for over 4 decades and having blood on their hands then I'd happily question any "official" statements regarding the real James Paul McCartney, if they were ever to make one.
You would question that, but not the massive amounts of manipulation carried out in these videos? I have demonstrated the wilful manipulation undertaken and you have yet to respond to it. Perhaps if you spent a second looking into these videos with the same critical eye that you look at song lyrics, you may be surprised.
Yes I'm hooked, no problem admitting that, but how does that make me a hypocrite? I find the RA series fascinating, as I do the forums dedicated to PID. I don't happen to actually believe the conspiracy - so what?
As for the DNA test hypothesis - you critisise me for making assumptions, make one yourself ('it'll never happen and we all know why') and in the next line you say 'but you're right'. So...
I asked for evidence, and you put forth the Mills video. Now you're telling me that it's not evidence? Why did you mention it, then? To suggest that the PID claim is based on vague phrases that could signify a thousand conclusions? When I stated that Mills would say "Paul was replaced", the insinuation is that she would explain how. And you're right, this would not be a solid piece of evidence (though not circumstantial as you suggest) but it would be much more solid than these vague clues.
Well you do like to spread falsehoods! I never stated or implied the Heather Mills interview was "evidence." I believe you know the difference between evidence and clues. I`m not building you a fucking file for the DPP you ass, I`m merely giving you clues - You`ll never make a detective, you`re proving that in spades!
I asked for evidence and you told me to watch the Heather Mills interview. Exactly what was I supposed to conclude? I have been told that there is plenty of evidence, so why did you give me clues which could offer thousands of interpretations instead of this evidence?
If you can show me where exactly I said the Heather Mills interview is conclusive proof that Paul McCartney is dead/or was replaced then you`re going to win the VERY SPECIAL PRIZE of going upwards slightly in my estimation as a researcher, but until then I say bon appetite!
As far as making detective, all I can say is that real life is not like a Holmes mystery or a film noir. Detectives don't spin a crime out of their heads and then start looking for clues to reinforce the crime that they just created. They actually have to see direct evidence that a crime took place before looking for clues that will lead them to evidence. And they certainly don't accept the clues as evidence of anything. And they don't solve crimes by spending hours on the internet.
Court of law vs. common sense? This conspiracy that you are creating suggests a massive criminal act based on no evidence. Therefore, we have exited the realm of common sense (because there is nothing to suggest your conclusion) and entered into the realm of the law. See, crimes of this matter are usually complex, and you can't solve them by spending a few hours on the internet comparing videos.
I haven`t created a conspiracy and where you see a conspiracy I see the blatantly obvious. And why is that I wonder? - Well I`ve been researching this "conspiracy" a long time. You say I`ve entered this area with my conclusion intact-well you`re just proving you`re more of an idiot with every line. You`re the one with the intact belief that Paul wasn`t replaced. You won`t even consider that he may have been, so your the man who has come here with your concrete beliefs!
Yes, you are entering with your conclusion intact. The Paul is Dead rumor has existed for nearly 40 years and the original claims (re: the accident) have been thoroughly debunked. After claims are debunked, the theorists just move onto other possibilities -- meaning that a conclusion is established (Paul is Dead, or Paul Was Replaced) and evidence consistently changes to fit that conclusion. If the PID theory didn't start with a conclusion, the car crash story and clues would still be relevant.
You have no idea what you`re talking about - you really think you do but ure off the mark on nearly all of your points. Firstly, I NEVER SAID THAT I BELIEVE PAUL IS DEAD. And I`ll say it again now, I don`t know whether the original Paul McCartney is dead or alive. The conclusion I have reached from years of painstaking research is that Paul McCartney of the Beatles was DEFINATELY REPLACED. Of this I have no doubt. I did in no way believe this until I did my research over a long period of time.
I would strongly advise any else commenting on this matter would do the same - HOWEVER SOME OF US ARE HERE WITH OUR MINDS ALREADY MADE UP ON THE ISSUE - HAVE YOU DONE YOUR HOMEWORK JGUILDERSLEEVE??? You keep saying "show me proof" - carry me, spoonfeed me - AGAIN DO YOUR HOMEWORK!
I didn't say that you did. Merely that the PID story changed when the former claims were debunked, just like the current ones will. The conclusion will remain the same but the claims will consistently be in transition, like any good conspiracy theory.
My concrete belief is in believing people are who they say they are unless there is proof otherwise. As far as considering that Paul was replaced, I think that it is rational to consider it as much as it would be to consider the replacement of anyone who claims to be who they are. The burden of proof is in your hands, not mine. And so far, there has been none.
This conspiracy which I DIDN`T CREATE "suggests a massive criminal act" - ehhhhh you think?, "based on no evidence"- says the half baked lawyer who is too lazy or stupid to actually go out and look for any.
I suggest you read my comment more carefully. What you are suggesting is a massive criminal act whether there is evidence for it or not. Fictional murder mysteries also suggest massive criminal acts, that doesn't mean they actually happened.
I am aware that the videos are not photographic. I was responding to your earlier point that there are both photos and videos which allegedly prove your point. You could tell more from videos than photos, but not if you're looking for behavioral differences. Life is not like the movies, and people do change in a short span of time from a variety of influences, often much more radically than in the videos you recommended.
Baaaaaaaaa....the sheeple do not want to belive they can be fooled. They think they are too smart. Watch the video of Faul talking to the Russian media not too long ago; at the end he makes a bleeting sound of a sheep: The sheep go where they are led, but by the time you wake up to where you are being herded to it will be too late. But it is only music ,right? Baaaaaaaaaaaaaa
The problem is that when you enter into a study with your conclusion intact, you will naturally look only for the things that support your conclusion, which is the worst approach imaginable. The reason is because you can do it with anything. Based on those two videos I could just as easily come to same conclusion about John being replaced in 1966 and it would be as equally groundless.
I looked at the Paul videos. Now you should look at John Lennon in the Paperback Writer video and compare him to the John Lennon in the Strawberry Fields Forever video. It is less than a year between both videos, but the differences are even more wildly pronounced than the two Paul's that you showed me.
Also a photograph represents a mere split second wherein expressions can wildly vary -- if you've ever taken a frighteningly bad picture, you understand this. No one in a real examination, then, would ever accept photographic evidence as you lay it out.
My definition of evidence is the same definition that is used in both the scientific field and a court of law. Photographic evidence, incidentally, does not hold up as evidence in cases of what is claimed to be impersonation. Any photographer can tell you that the slightest difference in angle or shade can immediately alter the way someone looks in a photo.
The two interviews are video evidence NOT photographic - you can obviously tell much more from a video than a mere photograph and we`re not in a court of law my good man, we`re in the court of common sense. Also there is much more evidence on hand than the photos (which can be easily doctored) but I won`t be spoon-feeding anyone as I said before.
as soon as my eyes were opened they might just as well been closed. look up for your redemption draws near. all hands on deck we run afloat i heard the captain cry. replace the cook explore the ship let no one leave alive. just how far can sailors fly? na na nu nu du du du.
can you please stop making these crazy videos that no one understands with random flashes of pictures. im sure all of this has some major relevance and could be very useful if compiled in a neat and orderly fashion. like a single website or something. you have allot of useful information and ideas to share but these videos are too confusing. good job though. im interested in this topic and these videos just confuse more because im only given glimpses of clues.
Interesting that my posts explaining the total lack of evidence that Paul was replaced have been deleted. I'm sure that no one missed the irony, given that these videos are all about an alleged cover up.
Lol! A conspiracy to cover up the truth of a non-conspiracy. I like it. Seriously though, I'm sorry your posts were deleted. Every one should be allowed to express their views.
i saw a pic of the tribe that has just been discovered in brazil (which was in the news very recently). aswell as some other interesting things. dont know what they mean though :p
You know how people use beatles lyrics to point to pauls alleged death....has anyone pointed out the lyrics of Don't Pass Me By? "You were in a car crash and you lost your hair" hair could mean head as is the speculation that paul was decapitated.
Judging from Iaap's recent videos and also other artist's song lyrics clues it seems that JPM lived beyond 1966.
The original PID story was just a lot of obvious references and an obvious "lookalike contest" story put together. The essence of it was true of course.
We musn't forget that some lyrics could be about "other flowers in the dirt" - Epstein, Marianne Faithfull/the two girls left on the hill etc. It's easy to get into the habit of thinking every Beatles song is about JPM.
Well, Iaap vids recently have focused on the Spahn ranch/Manson stuff - that's post 66.
One of his videos has a quick graphic that shows "Paul died" changing into "Paul lived". Can't recall which one.
Also, other artists lyrics allude to JPM being in hiding in the US or ending up disabled.
I'm not saying I believe any of these fully as there are many plausible interpretations about JPM's fate. It's possible he wanted to leave the band so the "car crash" story was a cover to throw us off.
Cool. Thank for the info. I suspect also that he didn't really die in a car crash the way the urban legend suggests. Why would the Beatles then leave all those clues in their albums suggesting that he did? That would be callous beyond belief. I think he just left the band because he was tired of it. Just my speculations.
*****I suspect also that he didn't really die in a car crash the way the urban legend suggests. Why would the Beatles then leave all those clues in their albums suggesting that he did?*****
To get the truth out.
*****That would be callous beyond belief.*****
Wasn't it callous anyway?
*****I think he just left the band because he was tired of it. *****
For whatever it is worth, IAAP obviously believes that he died. What is the name of this video?
It's difficult to stick to one interpretation of events when there are a few plausible - I've changed my onw mind many times. That's the idea, you see: info/disinfo/theories until you end up confused and disillusioned. That's psy-war. I think the Beatles were hijacked by MI and had to do as told. Still, depsite all that, I do get the feeling the narrative is being narrowed down lately and we're close. Also, I think what happened to JPM was not one event but a series of events.
"But "lived" is STILL past tense. It means that he's NOT living now."
True.
Gfa is implying he killed himself. The JPM narrative has France (Sylvie/Johnny), Spain, possibly Gibraltar and also the USA/California. And that's just physical events, before we get into Crowley/possible relatives and then other "flowers in the dirt". Some say Ringo was replaced. Two are flying, two are not?
It makes your head spin doesn't it? We are the fools.
Thanks. It is very interesting. I'm now reading some information that George was replaced in '78, with some compelling photos to back it up. Wow! Yes, I'm sane. I just think the rest of the world is crazy... most of it, any way! :)
I do think most of us are in agreement that the replacement first shows up in public in December 1966. The question still remains, what was the fate of the original. Why did he leave?:
Was it his own choice? Was he forced out? Was he injured and not able to continue?
This crew apparently got around to watching "Innocence" by youknowmyname321, who makes the same dubious connections with the Beatles' arm positions in "Help." I'm sure one could make the same case with the Muppets.
Also can some start making vids that explain what the hell these videos mean. Or am I the only one who has no clue what the past 20 or so videos are getting at.
And Amun, Amen, or Amon-re was sometimes associated with the Ram (and that's why Paul named his album "Ram," because he's an Egyptian magician who also writes catchy songs and loves kids).
He's stretching (what else is new?)to make a connection between The Beatles and the first letters in the Italian spelling of the Egyptian city Thebes (Thebea). The patron saint of Thebes was Amon-ra, King of the Gods, whose temple is also shown in this video.
Aleister Crowley, the Bonzo Dog Doo Dah Band, astrological signs. Tie it all together dude. Come on. And that picture of the natives with bow & arrows at 2:45 is just a news photo from last week about a remote tribe that was discovered in Brazil. What could that possibly have to do with PID???
I was wondering the same thing about the "tribe" pic being in there. I can't imagine what that has to do with any of this. I didn't watch any of Phoney's vids for about a month now and just started back up again last night.Looks like he or she is going with the Satanic angle again.
What is the answer then, dude. I just think it's obnoxious. We know "Paul" isn't Paul. So if this IamaPhoney dude is in the inner circle AND really knows the true story, he should just spill it. Sh*t or get off the pot, as they say!
"We know 'Paul' isn't Paul." What? There is zero evidence suggesting that this isn't the same Paul. We need to stop taking as givens things that are outright false before we can even begin to discuss an issue.
I already came to this conclusion a long time ago, based on solid evidence, as many others have. That is no longer the issue. The only true issues are: 1) What happened to the original? 2) Why was he replaced? 3) Who is this guy who replaced him?, and 4) How did they manage to pull it off and keep it a secret from most of us for 40 years... including me, and obviously you?!?!
He did go to jail in Japan for a while in 1980. Does that count? j/k :) But seriously, I feel like you are putting a little too much confidence in your legal system (regardless of the country you live in). Anyway, I guess we'll have to agree to disagree. Peace!
Sorry - we're talking about reality here not movies. This is not a matter of opinion - we're dealing with real people. What are you suggesting? That I should faith in no evidence and conspiracy theorists but not in a legal system that was actively attempting to charge The Beatles with any crime they could think of throughout the 60s and the 70s?
Not exactly. It's impossible for me to prove what I believe absolutely to be the truth about Paul McCartney being replaced in 500 words or less. Like I said, it looks we'll have to agree to disagree on this one. Thanks for your comments. Peace.
CODE
EuroZorro 2 weeks ago
En el min. 2.18 aparece Faul con un túnica negra con cuello rosa ¿de que se trata?
Thanks
Sacredmush 6 months ago
If that isn't the real Paul, then why is it that it keeps showing early pictures of the "real Paul"?? Look at 3:26...
AlT70 9 months ago
1 :30 to 1:45 is really interesting
thephattyarbuckle 10 months ago
It was 20 years ago today, Mr. Crowley taught the band to play...
74910601LLEWSOR
WizardOfLies 1 year ago 2
@IEnjoyHippies They are photos of satanic symbols from an old Aleister Crowley book.
tjrxk7 1 year ago
omg he sounds like stewie from family guy
chasityxo 1 year ago
I think Iamaphoney is trying to tell us that he invented the OTO (the Ordo Templi Orientis) Aleister Crowley's occult organization and that those poses in Help! are actually occult ritual poses he created. I'm not sure what the fake photos of John's death mean. But I'd really like to know what that glowing cocoon was.
xander7ful 2 years ago 2
jUSt Will-i-am
PortonDownSyndrome 2 years ago
Whos that guy??where am I??????//
marrow777 2 years ago
Yep, it was pretty good up until 20, I agree. Getting pretty self indulgent and tedious now pal...
lostinbass4 2 years ago 2
what is the name of this song?
chris7574 3 years ago
@chris7574 1882. This song dates back to 1970 when it was first recorded as a demo around the time of the McCartney album
zephiloyd 1 year ago
indeed.. you're a phoney
m16g04 3 years ago
so google is my friend¿?
increible0incredula 3 years ago
Looks like I am a phoney is trying to say he is John... do you see the close ups... this is gettin' nuts
jrrcor 3 years ago
okay so the RUMOR says that william campbell said he'd be resurrected in 20 years. the rumor said that paul died in 66. that's 19 years. and they started recording 12 days after the alleged "death". they found a replacement in 12 days?
paul is alive.
TheFracturedCrew 3 years ago
Used to be an interessting series up untill 20 but has gone downhill since then. Too much of the same points over and over again. And what's teh point of comparing a Crowley pose (stretched arms) with the poses of the Beatles on Help! Help was from 1965 and Paul only would have died in the fall of 1966.
waterloo13 3 years ago 2
@waterloo13 Just a guess... I think he's trying to demonstrate the influence that Crowley had on their music.
Lurking99 1 year ago
and thats over a year after revolver..lol he has changed
dimebuckerpickups 3 years ago
small step for Him
giant leap for you
MaIEvans 3 years ago
it was a fake mustache.
thebystander 3 years ago
What the hey!
Paul is still alive! And I think so is Ringo...
So yea.Paul is ALIVE!
hOwDyKaTrYnA 3 years ago
you lie. he die.
thebystander 3 years ago
I don't like you! Derk!
Ok so if MY James Paul McCartney is dead WHICH he ISN'T, then why was he on Larry King in 2007?!
HUH! AND why does he have a BRAND new album that came out?I happen to know that it was #3 out of 200 other albums!
So HA! I got you there butt head buddy! >:p
hOwDyKaTrYnA 3 years ago
he blew his mind out in a car.
thebystander 3 years ago
he die. miss him, miss him.
thebystander 3 years ago
Faul's overblown sense of self-importance here is funny. Stupid rock stars sounding off about the state of society and politics as if they were ever something other than useful idiots for the far-left. And in the case of The BeaTles, Tavistock puppets and Establishment occultists.
to761983 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Once again, you are merely making several blanket statements without providing any evidence. You see, anybody who is interested in making a serious argument doesn't just spin comments from their heads - they actually have to base their claims in reality, namely a documentary or historical record.
JGuildersleeve 3 years ago
i agree
dimebuckerpickups 3 years ago
you are right on.
thebystander 3 years ago 2
1:35 is just wow!thats the stuff i am here for.
neozos 3 years ago
omg... WTH does it matter if he's dead or not!!?? Even if he is dead (what I strongly doubt) what is the point of placing 'evidence' on youtube, if you wanna be sure go hack the pentagon or something in that direction O.o
DrakeSilmore 3 years ago 2
what about pauls brother mike who used to perform with scaffold surely if there was a conspiracy to replace a dead paul mccartney then surely he would have known so too would all the rest of pauls family for god sake dont bullshit us no longer its doing my fucking head in even my son who is ten is confused if you solid evidence put us all out of our misery for fuck sake
M374EVL 3 years ago
McCartney and Harrison aren't throwing Sign of the Grades tho
dontbotherthatguy 3 years ago
PAUL IS ALIVE
pol1407a 3 years ago
CLUE
"if a clue you seek then google is your friend, and there is always the tube that you to look inside of"
anyone catch that?
uknomemta 3 years ago
I really like this video. What's the bit about John being shown periodically as if he is being filmed ?
Truthseeker47 3 years ago
Note that George Harrison--lead guitarist--is wearing a top hat on the cover of HELP! What guitar hero would wear a top hat twenty-two years later.
Slash.
What connection might Slash have with the Beatles? Not much direct connection, but type in MTV Awards 1995 here in Youtube's search engine and see that there's a link between him and "the man with the foolish grin."
deepvoodoo 3 years ago
Oh shit, I read your comment as "Pre-colour 1966 photos" Hilarion. Sorry about that little mistake. Still, my point about missing eye colour still stands.
epicpacard 3 years ago
Let them fight, and do as they will. That's the power behind this throne.
ANKHAFNUKHONSU 3 years ago
the power is under the throne, its called the lia fail,, macca goes back to tea tephi, look and you will see.
howdoyousleepyoucunt 3 years ago
Hilarion, have you ever heard the saying "The first one to resort to insults has lost the argument"?
epicpacard 3 years ago
This is my last comment, I won`t be able to come back here for some time. For anyone who is interested look into Jane Asher and why she has never spoken of her split from "Paul McCartney" in 1968. They were engaged to be married and she is one of the few women from this period of the Beatles who refuses to speak about this time.
Hilarion1771 3 years ago
She did make an announcement in 1968. Still, her silence is not evidence. Interesting that you can not find a quotation from anyone in a position to know if Paul was replaced to corroborate your claims (including Jane Asher's brother who categorically denied the PID rumor after their split). As a result your only recourse is to interpret what was not said, since you have nobody saying anything. You can't say that a lack of evidence is actually evidence. That's just poor logic.
JGuildersleeve 3 years ago
I've recently wondered if Derren Brown could be behind all this. I doubt he is but the whole concept of 'iamaphoney' and how it has developed over the months reminds me of one of his elaborate mind control stunts. I have no doubt he could pull this off.
bluefinger43 3 years ago
It would take less than Derren Brown to fool you lad, you`ve been mind controlled your whole life.
Hilarion1771 3 years ago
Mmm...having thought about it I concede the comment about Derren Brown lacks foundation but then so does your apparent certainty that I've been 'mind controlled my whole life'. I take it you're immune to such things, then.
bluefinger43 3 years ago
No I appreciate your honesty, we`re all under some form of programming/mind control - why is so much money spent on advertising/marketing every year. Hundreds of millions also spent on political campaigns, guess they they just want to give us a hand making up our minds.
Hilarion1771 3 years ago
I thought that too probably on C4 next week lol
250njb 3 years ago
Can someone tell me what movie that is playing during the video, where Paul and Ringo are in the Colonial era?
epicpacard 3 years ago
See the problem here is we have a few people who have alot more knowledge and put in more time than many others - like being in second or third year of college. Then some arrogant first year git like JGuildersleeve wants the second years to not only sit his exams but to pay his fees for the year. Gimme evidence, spoonfeed me cause I`m a lazy shit and I think you`re all conspiracy freaks - WIll YOU FUCK OFF UP TO URE ROOM AND STUDY URE RES IPSA LOQUITUR!
Hilarion1771 3 years ago
In any field, it doesn't matter what it is, claims need to be backed up with evidence. That you reduce what is necessary everywhere else as "spoonfeeding" shows how utterly incapable you are of reinforcing your own points. A scientist doesn't just make a claim and tell everyone else to re-affirm his claim for him by searching for their own evidence. A lawyer doesn't just tell a jury the crime and force them to go out and look for evidence. They are required to be responsible for their claims.
JGuildersleeve 3 years ago
I completely disagree, I have no interest in leading the blind - When the pupil is ready the master will appear. You are not yet ready to see or hear - to even bring PID into the criminal field shows you have obviously no idea yet how deep this whole scenario goes. Go away now and do your homework like a good lad........ know when it`s over your head and just go and research...........off with you now, and bring all those other geniuses with you who don`t believe in proper research!
Hilarion1771 3 years ago
Nobody who considers themselves above the kind of proof that is required everywhere else in the real world is serious about their claims. It is the distinction between petty amateurish postering and somebody who is capable of making serious arguments.
JGuildersleeve 3 years ago
Unfortunately for you, you believe you`re living in a world which is real - boy are you in for some shock.
Hilarion1771 3 years ago
See this is what I have to put up with - one guy who speaks of argumentation as if it`s some godly gift from the renaissance and who refuses to investigate anything outside of his "real world". The other (bluefinger) who lords a second rate illusionist like Derren Brown. The real magician here is the one who has fooled more people, like you two, for over 42 years. As they say if you want to hide something from people put it in front of them, call it something else and they`ll never see it!
Hilarion1771 3 years ago
I speak of the standard of proof that is required in every field where argumentation is used. That you do not take this basic requirement seriously shows how serious your argument is. The fact that you do not even verify your own examples (hazel eyes) shows how willing you are to live in a fantasy world rather than reality.
JGuildersleeve 3 years ago
I have a simple one for you here JGuildersleeve - I`m sure you`re well aware by now that Paul McCartney has dark brown (hazel) eyes - just examine pre-1966 colour photos and anything recent. NOW, go to the "Hey Jude" video and ask yourself why McCartney (camera is in his face early on) has green eyes in this video?
Hilarion1771 3 years ago
Uh, if they're black and white, then of course he's going to appear to have hazel eyes.
epicpacard 3 years ago
You`re a fucking idiot.
Hilarion1771 3 years ago
Also, if they conspiracy is massive enough to involve Aleister Crowley, UFOs, JFK's assassination, Nazi Germany, John Lennon's murder, and bring in hundreds of people and keep them silent, then how in the hell did they miss such a glaring error as eye color?
epicpacard 3 years ago
Why does it involve "Nahzee Germany"?
John Lennon was a raving marxist in the 70's and Crowley worked for "British" intel/the All-lies.
"The 60's" was a communist production.
to761983 3 years ago
Can you explain what you mean when you say that "'The 60's' was a communist production"? Was the US attack on South Vietnam "a communist production"? Was the homefront reaction to it "a communist production"? I'm unclear on your terminology.
JGuildersleeve 3 years ago
ever heard about hegel?marxism/communism and nazism join in an y-shaped axis.
neozos 3 years ago
Hegelian dialectics? Yes, I get what you mean.
to761983 3 years ago
I don't. Hegel died before the Communist Manifesto was written, and before Nazism flourished. Perhaps if you were less vague in your points, they would be easier to understand. TO simply has a long history of commenting on things he doesn't understand (see the history in IAAP's comment section).
JGuildersleeve 3 years ago
Go to any website of your choosing on eye color and they will tell you that Hazel eyes more than any other color are more likely than others to shift in color mostly due to lighting (ex. intense studio lighting) from brown to green. So, for example, in Hey Jude his eyes are more green (although certainly brownish at times) and in Fool on the Hill they are a more darker brown. This is all very common with hazel eyes and anybody who has seriously studied this issue would know that.
JGuildersleeve 3 years ago
You`re now an expert on eye colour - good for you.
Hilarion1771 3 years ago
blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah.
dontbotherthatguy 3 years ago
just wanted to contribute too.
dontbotherthatguy 3 years ago
All this talk of "bread in the kitchen of the big house upstairs" is making me hungry.
resbesbee 3 years ago
If Paul is dead than who is Ringo singing about in 1974's "Back Off Boogaloo"?
"Wake up meathead, don't pretend that you're dead"?
to761983 3 years ago
We get it. The original Paul's head was made out of some sort of beef (or pork). Geez, no need to hit us over the head (pun intended!).
JGuildersleeve 3 years ago
Ah, you've blown you're cover.
Also, you must have some sort of gay grudge by following me everywhere. I'm not your type, either as fag or as arrogant egomaniac with a God complex who suffers from the delusion that he is the sole arbiter of "scientific proof" in the universe.
You're not even original, just like every other denier-troll:
1) Demand "evidence" while falsely describing truth-tellers, in a mocking arrogant tone.
2) Deny and dismiss any evidence presented, repeat rest of above.
to761983 3 years ago
You're painfully unaware that you have an extreme, arrogant tone which comes over claarly to me and everyone, that you have some kind of God complex. There is no proof bar that verified by you. Wouldn't be so bad if you were actually "scientific" (as is your fetish) but you're not. Other trolls know when they are pretending to demand "evidence" that they are just pretending and when they deny, dismiss, deny it is only for effect (to make it LOOK as though they've "won"). You believe your BS. LOL
to761983 3 years ago
PS you're not funny.
This overblown, pompous creature styles itslef as a "scintific" intellectual (as all denier trolls on PID, 9/11 truth threads do, been there, seen that).
Here's what he actually is. Clap your hands.
watch?v=6u9yEQEM0do&NR=1
to761983 3 years ago
He's singing to Paul IMO. May Pang said once on a usenet post that Boogaloo was part of a "war" going on among the Beatles at the time. "Don't pretend that you're dead" is very telling... Think about it..
JoJo6207 3 years ago
John or Paul?
If one of them is really still alive I suppose I'd bet on John.
I don't necessarily believe that though.
to761983 3 years ago
In 1974 they were both still (allegedly) alive, but it makes no sense that John would be the one being addressed here. Furthermore, I'd wager John wrote that song for Ringo in the first place..
JoJo6207 3 years ago
Er, oh yeah, I messed up.
Ringo means Apple in Japanese apparently. Happy Code-day, Ring of Stars.
to761983 3 years ago
If Paul is dead than who is Ringo singing about in 1974's "Back Off Boogaloo"?
"Wake up meathead, don't pretend that you're dead"?
to761983 3 years ago
It also insinuates that the original Paul's head may have been made out of beef or possibly pork. Is it possible that "A Taste of Honey" from the PPM album could be a hint of the glaze used to coat Paul's delicious head? I know it's a cover but they must have been some reason why they chose that particular song. We may be through the looking glass on this one. Just thinking out loud here.
JGuildersleeve 3 years ago
Whoa - just thought of a few things. The first US Beatles album was called Meet The Beatles (Meat The Beatles???), possibly a clue to the American market re: Paul's head. And, of course, the biggest clue of all, the famous covered-up Beatles photo featuring of all things, headless babies and SLABS OF MEAT!!!! Lennon sang "I been to Meat City". No doubt he had.
JGuildersleeve 3 years ago
Everyone just ignore Guilders he's a troll.
He hasn't even bothered to read up on this topic that's why he makes silly over-the-top statements like "not a shred of evidence" (because evidence always comes in shreds).
to761983 3 years ago
Then produce evidence. Give me an example of evidence. Like I have mentioned repeatedly, I'd be happy to examine it.
JGuildersleeve 3 years ago
Even if McCartney submitted his DNA for independent testing and it came up positive some of these pid people would still say it was faked. So, there's really no point in arguing about any of this - but it is fun.
bluefinger43 3 years ago
Admit it, you're hooked, hypocrite.
And don't make grand assumptions about DNA challenge tests, bluffer, it'll never happen and we all know why.
But you're right, after lying to the world for over 4 decades and having blood on their hands then I'd happily question any "official" statements regarding the real James Paul McCartney, if they were ever to make one.
to761983 3 years ago
You would question that, but not the massive amounts of manipulation carried out in these videos? I have demonstrated the wilful manipulation undertaken and you have yet to respond to it. Perhaps if you spent a second looking into these videos with the same critical eye that you look at song lyrics, you may be surprised.
JGuildersleeve 3 years ago
Yes I'm hooked, no problem admitting that, but how does that make me a hypocrite? I find the RA series fascinating, as I do the forums dedicated to PID. I don't happen to actually believe the conspiracy - so what?
As for the DNA test hypothesis - you critisise me for making assumptions, make one yourself ('it'll never happen and we all know why') and in the next line you say 'but you're right'. So...
bluefinger43 3 years ago
I asked for evidence, and you put forth the Mills video. Now you're telling me that it's not evidence? Why did you mention it, then? To suggest that the PID claim is based on vague phrases that could signify a thousand conclusions? When I stated that Mills would say "Paul was replaced", the insinuation is that she would explain how. And you're right, this would not be a solid piece of evidence (though not circumstantial as you suggest) but it would be much more solid than these vague clues.
JGuildersleeve 3 years ago
Well you do like to spread falsehoods! I never stated or implied the Heather Mills interview was "evidence." I believe you know the difference between evidence and clues. I`m not building you a fucking file for the DPP you ass, I`m merely giving you clues - You`ll never make a detective, you`re proving that in spades!
Hilarion1771 3 years ago
I asked for evidence and you told me to watch the Heather Mills interview. Exactly what was I supposed to conclude? I have been told that there is plenty of evidence, so why did you give me clues which could offer thousands of interpretations instead of this evidence?
JGuildersleeve 3 years ago
If you can show me where exactly I said the Heather Mills interview is conclusive proof that Paul McCartney is dead/or was replaced then you`re going to win the VERY SPECIAL PRIZE of going upwards slightly in my estimation as a researcher, but until then I say bon appetite!
Hilarion1771 3 years ago
As far as making detective, all I can say is that real life is not like a Holmes mystery or a film noir. Detectives don't spin a crime out of their heads and then start looking for clues to reinforce the crime that they just created. They actually have to see direct evidence that a crime took place before looking for clues that will lead them to evidence. And they certainly don't accept the clues as evidence of anything. And they don't solve crimes by spending hours on the internet.
JGuildersleeve 3 years ago
I agree here with this extraordinarily perceptive piece of commentary - 10/10.
Hilarion1771 3 years ago
Court of law vs. common sense? This conspiracy that you are creating suggests a massive criminal act based on no evidence. Therefore, we have exited the realm of common sense (because there is nothing to suggest your conclusion) and entered into the realm of the law. See, crimes of this matter are usually complex, and you can't solve them by spending a few hours on the internet comparing videos.
JGuildersleeve 3 years ago
I haven`t created a conspiracy and where you see a conspiracy I see the blatantly obvious. And why is that I wonder? - Well I`ve been researching this "conspiracy" a long time. You say I`ve entered this area with my conclusion intact-well you`re just proving you`re more of an idiot with every line. You`re the one with the intact belief that Paul wasn`t replaced. You won`t even consider that he may have been, so your the man who has come here with your concrete beliefs!
Hilarion1771 3 years ago
Yes, you are entering with your conclusion intact. The Paul is Dead rumor has existed for nearly 40 years and the original claims (re: the accident) have been thoroughly debunked. After claims are debunked, the theorists just move onto other possibilities -- meaning that a conclusion is established (Paul is Dead, or Paul Was Replaced) and evidence consistently changes to fit that conclusion. If the PID theory didn't start with a conclusion, the car crash story and clues would still be relevant.
JGuildersleeve 3 years ago
You have no idea what you`re talking about - you really think you do but ure off the mark on nearly all of your points. Firstly, I NEVER SAID THAT I BELIEVE PAUL IS DEAD. And I`ll say it again now, I don`t know whether the original Paul McCartney is dead or alive. The conclusion I have reached from years of painstaking research is that Paul McCartney of the Beatles was DEFINATELY REPLACED. Of this I have no doubt. I did in no way believe this until I did my research over a long period of time.
Hilarion1771 3 years ago
I would strongly advise any else commenting on this matter would do the same - HOWEVER SOME OF US ARE HERE WITH OUR MINDS ALREADY MADE UP ON THE ISSUE - HAVE YOU DONE YOUR HOMEWORK JGUILDERSLEEVE??? You keep saying "show me proof" - carry me, spoonfeed me - AGAIN DO YOUR HOMEWORK!
Hilarion1771 3 years ago
I didn't say that you did. Merely that the PID story changed when the former claims were debunked, just like the current ones will. The conclusion will remain the same but the claims will consistently be in transition, like any good conspiracy theory.
JGuildersleeve 3 years ago
The story which you and the majority of people believe is the conspiracy.
Hilarion1771 3 years ago
My concrete belief is in believing people are who they say they are unless there is proof otherwise. As far as considering that Paul was replaced, I think that it is rational to consider it as much as it would be to consider the replacement of anyone who claims to be who they are. The burden of proof is in your hands, not mine. And so far, there has been none.
JGuildersleeve 3 years ago
This conspiracy which I DIDN`T CREATE "suggests a massive criminal act" - ehhhhh you think?, "based on no evidence"- says the half baked lawyer who is too lazy or stupid to actually go out and look for any.
Hilarion1771 3 years ago
I suggest you read my comment more carefully. What you are suggesting is a massive criminal act whether there is evidence for it or not. Fictional murder mysteries also suggest massive criminal acts, that doesn't mean they actually happened.
JGuildersleeve 3 years ago
I am aware that the videos are not photographic. I was responding to your earlier point that there are both photos and videos which allegedly prove your point. You could tell more from videos than photos, but not if you're looking for behavioral differences. Life is not like the movies, and people do change in a short span of time from a variety of influences, often much more radically than in the videos you recommended.
JGuildersleeve 3 years ago
Baaaaaaaaa....the sheeple do not want to belive they can be fooled. They think they are too smart. Watch the video of Faul talking to the Russian media not too long ago; at the end he makes a bleeting sound of a sheep: The sheep go where they are led, but by the time you wake up to where you are being herded to it will be too late. But it is only music ,right? Baaaaaaaaaaaaaa
thors00 3 years ago
I'd like to see that complete interview..... does anyone know where to locate it ?
Thanks
awilk2001 3 years ago
The problem is that when you enter into a study with your conclusion intact, you will naturally look only for the things that support your conclusion, which is the worst approach imaginable. The reason is because you can do it with anything. Based on those two videos I could just as easily come to same conclusion about John being replaced in 1966 and it would be as equally groundless.
JGuildersleeve 3 years ago
I looked at the Paul videos. Now you should look at John Lennon in the Paperback Writer video and compare him to the John Lennon in the Strawberry Fields Forever video. It is less than a year between both videos, but the differences are even more wildly pronounced than the two Paul's that you showed me.
JGuildersleeve 3 years ago
Also a photograph represents a mere split second wherein expressions can wildly vary -- if you've ever taken a frighteningly bad picture, you understand this. No one in a real examination, then, would ever accept photographic evidence as you lay it out.
JGuildersleeve 3 years ago
My definition of evidence is the same definition that is used in both the scientific field and a court of law. Photographic evidence, incidentally, does not hold up as evidence in cases of what is claimed to be impersonation. Any photographer can tell you that the slightest difference in angle or shade can immediately alter the way someone looks in a photo.
JGuildersleeve 3 years ago
The two interviews are video evidence NOT photographic - you can obviously tell much more from a video than a mere photograph and we`re not in a court of law my good man, we`re in the court of common sense. Also there is much more evidence on hand than the photos (which can be easily doctored) but I won`t be spoon-feeding anyone as I said before.
Hilarion1771 3 years ago
the one after 909 is 911.
howdoyousleepyoucunt 3 years ago
as soon as my eyes were opened they might just as well been closed. look up for your redemption draws near. all hands on deck we run afloat i heard the captain cry. replace the cook explore the ship let no one leave alive. just how far can sailors fly? na na nu nu du du du.
howdoyousleepyoucunt 3 years ago
can you please stop making these crazy videos that no one understands with random flashes of pictures. im sure all of this has some major relevance and could be very useful if compiled in a neat and orderly fashion. like a single website or something. you have allot of useful information and ideas to share but these videos are too confusing. good job though. im interested in this topic and these videos just confuse more because im only given glimpses of clues.
Greenhouse1515 3 years ago 3
Now that I've seen this, I'm really convinced that he's dead...
BrokenChair88 3 years ago
Whats the song played in this?
AbbeyRoadForever 3 years ago
1882 by Paul McCartney ;-)
Any90 3 years ago
Thank You :D
AbbeyRoadForever 3 years ago
...so he really has Evans's secrets...
Poprup 3 years ago
May Eye?
No sir, Rah!
WilliamAPHoney 3 years ago
Ok, it was nice all this for a while now seriously its boring. I´m John Lennon...
ObispoNo9 3 years ago 3
Alexandria NYC
SB9381 3 years ago
Son of the Sun
SB9381 3 years ago
OTO 23/6.
1970 year planner.
Astrologically timed Beastles schedule. Crowley-book poses.
Beastles code is astrological?
to761983 3 years ago
Congratulations again: Ladies and Gentlemen, we have a winner!
yhshvh10 3 years ago
i dont get any of your videos anymore
biggerboy2 3 years ago
me either
ooNATIVEoo 3 years ago
I never got them from the start. :S
KindHeartedPsycho 3 years ago
Interesting that my posts explaining the total lack of evidence that Paul was replaced have been deleted. I'm sure that no one missed the irony, given that these videos are all about an alleged cover up.
JGuildersleeve 3 years ago
Lol! A conspiracy to cover up the truth of a non-conspiracy. I like it. Seriously though, I'm sorry your posts were deleted. Every one should be allowed to express their views.
rog944 3 years ago
really great job-whatta puzzle-i get thelema,but-thebea les?
3:24-kicass
sanguine111 3 years ago
i saw a pic of the tribe that has just been discovered in brazil (which was in the news very recently). aswell as some other interesting things. dont know what they mean though :p
napsspur 3 years ago
You know how people use beatles lyrics to point to pauls alleged death....has anyone pointed out the lyrics of Don't Pass Me By? "You were in a car crash and you lost your hair" hair could mean head as is the speculation that paul was decapitated.
pika23 3 years ago
Yes, that's been pointed out many times before.
LODGE4444 3 years ago
Judging from Iaap's recent videos and also other artist's song lyrics clues it seems that JPM lived beyond 1966.
The original PID story was just a lot of obvious references and an obvious "lookalike contest" story put together. The essence of it was true of course.
We musn't forget that some lyrics could be about "other flowers in the dirt" - Epstein, Marianne Faithfull/the two girls left on the hill etc. It's easy to get into the habit of thinking every Beatles song is about JPM.
to761983 3 years ago
"Judging from Iaap's recent videos and also other artist's song lyrics clues it seems that JPM lived beyond 1966."
What clues in "the rotten apple" series?? Pictures? I haven't noticed them.
rog944 3 years ago
Well, Iaap vids recently have focused on the Spahn ranch/Manson stuff - that's post 66.
One of his videos has a quick graphic that shows "Paul died" changing into "Paul lived". Can't recall which one.
Also, other artists lyrics allude to JPM being in hiding in the US or ending up disabled.
I'm not saying I believe any of these fully as there are many plausible interpretations about JPM's fate. It's possible he wanted to leave the band so the "car crash" story was a cover to throw us off.
to761983 3 years ago
Cool. Thank for the info. I suspect also that he didn't really die in a car crash the way the urban legend suggests. Why would the Beatles then leave all those clues in their albums suggesting that he did? That would be callous beyond belief. I think he just left the band because he was tired of it. Just my speculations.
rog944 3 years ago
*****I suspect also that he didn't really die in a car crash the way the urban legend suggests. Why would the Beatles then leave all those clues in their albums suggesting that he did?*****
To get the truth out.
*****That would be callous beyond belief.*****
Wasn't it callous anyway?
*****I think he just left the band because he was tired of it. *****
For whatever it is worth, IAAP obviously believes that he died. What is the name of this video?
HaHaHaPaulIsDead 3 years ago
*****I think he just left the band because he was tired of it.*****
The ONE thing that I can say in support of that is that in 1963, JPM told David Frost that he'd like to retire.
HaHaHaPaulIsDead 3 years ago
It's difficult to stick to one interpretation of events when there are a few plausible - I've changed my onw mind many times. That's the idea, you see: info/disinfo/theories until you end up confused and disillusioned. That's psy-war. I think the Beatles were hijacked by MI and had to do as told. Still, depsite all that, I do get the feeling the narrative is being narrowed down lately and we're close. Also, I think what happened to JPM was not one event but a series of events.
to761983 3 years ago
*****One of his videos has a quick graphic that shows "Paul died" changing into "Paul lived". Can't recall which one.*****
I remember that, and I don't recall which one either.
But "lived" is STILL past tense. It means that he's NOT living now.
HaHaHaPaulIsDead 3 years ago
"But "lived" is STILL past tense. It means that he's NOT living now."
True.
Gfa is implying he killed himself. The JPM narrative has France (Sylvie/Johnny), Spain, possibly Gibraltar and also the USA/California. And that's just physical events, before we get into Crowley/possible relatives and then other "flowers in the dirt". Some say Ringo was replaced. Two are flying, two are not?
It makes your head spin doesn't it? We are the fools.
to761983 3 years ago
Thanks. It is very interesting. I'm now reading some information that George was replaced in '78, with some compelling photos to back it up. Wow! Yes, I'm sane. I just think the rest of the world is crazy... most of it, any way! :)
rog944 3 years ago
*****Judging from Iaap's recent videos and also other artist's song lyrics clues it seems that JPM lived beyond 1966.*****
I don't think so. Rotten Apple 30 makes it pretty clear that the replacement first shows up in public in December 1966.
HaHaHaPaulIsDead 3 years ago
I do think most of us are in agreement that the replacement first shows up in public in December 1966. The question still remains, what was the fate of the original. Why did he leave?:
Was it his own choice? Was he forced out? Was he injured and not able to continue?
rog944 3 years ago 2
"Don't Pass Me By" was also originally written in 1963, which makes any inclusion of it in this utter nonsense completely pointless.
konajinx 3 years ago
Son of the magician at 3:26!
Very exciting! Tank you
zachtblauw 3 years ago
help clues excellent
yesitruth 3 years ago
OK I Figured it it to these two things. Either Paul and/or the beatles were into Crawley or IAMPHONEY IS!!!!
skyprop 3 years ago
YALE skull and bones 322
yhshvh10 3 years ago
This crew apparently got around to watching "Innocence" by youknowmyname321, who makes the same dubious connections with the Beatles' arm positions in "Help." I'm sure one could make the same case with the Muppets.
JohnCharles2007 3 years ago
Also can some start making vids that explain what the hell these videos mean. Or am I the only one who has no clue what the past 20 or so videos are getting at.
jello0075 3 years ago
It's ok, I can't understand anything from those things too.
itaigalgal 3 years ago
What do the people with different arm positions and the HELP! album cover mean?
jello0075 3 years ago
excellent work iamaphoney thank you!
grandfatheraleister 3 years ago
If you go back and check, you'll note that IAAP's recurring theme is the alleged Ram/Ammon/Scarab Beetle/Beatle connection.
JohnCharles2007 3 years ago
outstanding as always !
Thank you iamphoney
joshblue33 3 years ago
And Amun, Amen, or Amon-re was sometimes associated with the Ram (and that's why Paul named his album "Ram," because he's an Egyptian magician who also writes catchy songs and loves kids).
JohnCharles2007 3 years ago
He's stretching (what else is new?)to make a connection between The Beatles and the first letters in the Italian spelling of the Egyptian city Thebes (Thebea). The patron saint of Thebes was Amon-ra, King of the Gods, whose temple is also shown in this video.
JohnCharles2007 3 years ago
Aleister Crowley, the Bonzo Dog Doo Dah Band, astrological signs. Tie it all together dude. Come on. And that picture of the natives with bow & arrows at 2:45 is just a news photo from last week about a remote tribe that was discovered in Brazil. What could that possibly have to do with PID???
rog944 3 years ago
I was wondering the same thing about the "tribe" pic being in there. I can't imagine what that has to do with any of this. I didn't watch any of Phoney's vids for about a month now and just started back up again last night.Looks like he or she is going with the Satanic angle again.
highonmoses 3 years ago
Very nice presentation! Glad you're back.
awilk2001 3 years ago
Damn right.Too little too late Iamaphoney.YAWN.
hobostankjr 3 years ago
why dont u just say what ever the fuck u are trying to say iamaphoney?
its starting to get VERY boring indeed,...
and uhh,.........
last november 9 or 12 ,...ur was gonna reveall
THE secret,....... its now june,... and still nothing
marsL001 3 years ago
The answer is finally within reach . . .
JohnCharles2007 3 years ago
What is the answer then, dude. I just think it's obnoxious. We know "Paul" isn't Paul. So if this IamaPhoney dude is in the inner circle AND really knows the true story, he should just spill it. Sh*t or get off the pot, as they say!
rog944 3 years ago 3
"We know 'Paul' isn't Paul." What? There is zero evidence suggesting that this isn't the same Paul. We need to stop taking as givens things that are outright false before we can even begin to discuss an issue.
JGuildersleeve 3 years ago
I already came to this conclusion a long time ago, based on solid evidence, as many others have. That is no longer the issue. The only true issues are: 1) What happened to the original? 2) Why was he replaced? 3) Who is this guy who replaced him?, and 4) How did they manage to pull it off and keep it a secret from most of us for 40 years... including me, and obviously you?!?!
rog944 3 years ago
If there was solid evidence then the current impersonator would be in jail as you are describing a criminal act.
JGuildersleeve 3 years ago
He did go to jail in Japan for a while in 1980. Does that count? j/k :) But seriously, I feel like you are putting a little too much confidence in your legal system (regardless of the country you live in). Anyway, I guess we'll have to agree to disagree. Peace!
rog944 3 years ago
Sorry - we're talking about reality here not movies. This is not a matter of opinion - we're dealing with real people. What are you suggesting? That I should faith in no evidence and conspiracy theorists but not in a legal system that was actively attempting to charge The Beatles with any crime they could think of throughout the 60s and the 70s?
JGuildersleeve 3 years ago
Not exactly. It's impossible for me to prove what I believe absolutely to be the truth about Paul McCartney being replaced in 500 words or less. Like I said, it looks we'll have to agree to disagree on this one. Thanks for your comments. Peace.
rog944 3 years ago