To clarify im not saying activision should do it, i dont want it to be like Call of Duty. I like COD but i dont want to pay $60 to play a knock off. i want medal of honor to be bold and try to make their own unique multiplayer
Improvements don't have dice make the multiplayer I don't care if medal of honor screws it up it couldn't be any worse than DICE half asked attempt at multiplayer. Also more guns, its a fun game but the lack of variety in guns made it get boring fairly quickly. More pronounced kill streaks when you do support its never really clear what the kill streaks are actually doing. Another reason DICE shouldn't make multiplayer is they need a good multiplayer menu. Battlefield 3 has a shitty one.
@TheFlingbeeble Yes I agree with you 100%, Dont let dice touch nothing let dice worry about BF3. Danger close needs to put more effort into this game. The first one was not bad at all, I enjoyed it and still play it today, however it can get boring really fast due to very little guns and MAPS for sure needs way more maps this time.
If they play there cards right with the new medal of honor who knows... It could be better than cod and battlefield... Im kinda looking forward to it...
@DankDroBlunt1 Iv been saying this for a while, all they have to do is put more effort then they did in the last one and we could have a winner. I think this will be the COD killer this time, I have that feeling.
I think the reason the gun is floating by his chest is because in the military many people use chest rigs utilizing slings to attach the gun to themselves. That way they can let go of the gun but also have quick access to if they have to grab it again rather than have to set it down somewhere. It dangles in front of them.
Why does everyone bitch about not enough weapons in? There are over 20 weapons in this game. If your gonna bitch about snipers, find away around them, they're not OP. (Btw im a spec ops player), If you add too much it ruins the game. the first MOh was perfect the way it was post patch. Stop bitching about killl cam, learn the map.
And in case anyone is wondering, during this years GDC (Game Developers Conference) is when they will show off some gameplay for Medal of Honor: Warfighter using Frostbite 2. GDC 2012 starts March (next month) so we won't have to wait long. It's release date is October 2012.
And for Warfighter they're using the Frostbite 2 for Singleplayer and Multiplayer. But the multiplayer will be handled by Danger Close this time, not DICE.
1) graphics up to today's standards? I'd say they fare better than the last few CoD games released 2) campaign needs to be longer? CoD doesnt play by this, beat MW3 in 4 and a half hours. 3) It doesnt necessarily need more multiplayer modes, but stronger ones sure. Most of the modes in the CoD games the vast majority of players never touch, I doubt they would be missed. 4) Kill cam didnt help camping any in CoD, its still the campiest game out there and 5) Co-op, the only good point you made.
@Tealghost2011 I know right...I hate how players die after a single shot of a 7.62x54mm round...you need at least two shots to make it more realistic.
Also co-op and a spec ops missions would make sense
I agree it needs to be polished, the graphics weren't that good. The new engine would definitely help immerse people in the game if they can fix the bugs
The amount of weapons were fine The maps need to be larger, firefights now in days are at a pretty long distance
The game modes were fine, same amount if not more than bf3
Campaign (bold & underlined). Yes, MOH 2 needs a great deal of focus on single-player & polish (& coop too, I suppose). As far as multi-player goes, I'm way too happy with EA's sister title to ever abandon it, so the opportunity cost of a persuasive multi-player would be far too great to even be worth it. I hope to see a longer/better campaign (minus the Pre-rendered officer-general back-&-forth) and a bit more polish.
After battliefield 3, if they do make a medal of honor 2 there only going backwards. DICE did sweet fuck all to address the issues in the multiplayer. Sure the campaign was good but it failed on the multiplayer side big time
The campaign was amazing as far as the story goes! But now they have frostbite 2 which means we do not have to worry about the graphics. But back to my point the campaign had a great story and for once was basing it in current times. Fightong Talibans just adds that great set apart from any bad CoD game.
@LetsCutSomePie 24 would be too many unless they triple the size of the maps....which will essentially turn it into BF3.not good.Just give us more maps..the current map size is just fine.
@Infurnas for the singleplayer...IMHO,MOH got it right..they took an actual event in an ongoing war..depicted it pretty accurately,they actually had active duty personnel walk them through the development process...everything from the score to the their use of actual live taping of live fire to replicate the real thing...Black ops was more arcadey not as immersive.
@originaldelta MOH is way beter than COD and BF..just one thing more guns! and kill cam is needed for COD only because there is around 1 mil cheaters! have seen just one on MOH!
@darthvaderism I know the sniping spots so I make an effort to avoid their lines of sight..thats how you avoid getting sniped all the time.Don't stand out in the open and use cover
They should ask Spielberg to come up with a story and help them visualize the game's look. I agree, the 2010 Medal of Honor's visuals needed to be polished and the game could have used more time in production to do that. The multiplayer is confusing and needed a wide variety of match types like what Halo has.
Frostbite 2 and larger maps. No big need for vehicles but needs less camping although I did enjoy the multiplayer after I learned how to play it. I thought the multiplayer graphics were the best I've seen including bf3. More customization as well...on all fronts. Needs to be interesting enough to last until bc3.
The Campaign should have been longer but the Battle of Takur Ghar only lasted 2 Days I believe... at least they based everything on actual events and people
@ugatube I would say very close to around the same time Cod: Black Ops 2 comes out... which will probably be during the fall of this year. And yes I heard Black Ops 2 is the confirmed name of Treyarch's next CoD game... Unless I'm wrong, in which case MoH2 will most likely be around the same time as Treyarch's next CoD game whatever it will really be called. It seems that the Treyarch CoD games and MoH come out around the same time, which makes for some good competition between EA and Actvision.
@ugatube I just heard that MoH 2 is due out for an October release of this year, but that might not happen as no exact release date has been given by MoH's publisher EA Games is busy with other release due out this year which of course includes a new MVP Baseball, Madden, FIFA Soccer, and NHL.
I really don't know weather they should use unreal engine 3 or frostbite 2. I personally think unreal engine 3 is better from seeing what it can to with samartian.
1 Improvement MoH 2's MP needs above all else - To not be a CoD clone. Believe it or not, folks, you don't need to be exactly like CoD to compete with it.
Further more, do not let DICE develope it. At all. Rather, let Dangerclose develope it instead. Yeah sure, Battlefield is fun. But quite frankly I'd much rather see the gameplay elements that were in the campaign translated over to the multiplayer portion over DICE's lazy emulation of CoD with ported BC2 animations/assets like MoH 2010 had.
I thought MoH was overall good the only problems I had was the fact that the bolt action amulets were really powerful compared to the other guns and without a kill cam of some sort they could easily camp
Holy shit Graphics were great even now if u compare it to mw3 its a lot better, the big problem was multiplayer - too much loading time, no perks, very little weapons/customization, very few maps for the money, lags.
and please add more guns,kill streak,a kill cam, and more teams like marines,navyseal,rangers...etc improve the snipers so that its one shot one kill if it in the chest are upper.add some perks to make the game more interesting.and make the game a bit more longer.otherwise from these minor things the game have a awsome story line that is waaay better than madern warfare 2.I love medal of honor I got all the games they come out with and I know it they first online but i hope they improve the game
I wiould love if they get ride of the whole fucking rank up thing they got going for the online. they should have a rank up system like madern warfare. because i think it foolish to of to get 2000 points for a scope or a silencer. I hope the next one they come out with is better.they should make it so that you can rank up to like 75 max, and as you rank up you unlock different guns and perks. and when you used those guns you unlock different things for them. that would be so much better.
current multiplayer is kick ass, don't want or need killcam, if you're sick of getting sniped all the time then duh, don't run around in the open like a dumbass ...
MoH campaign story was good but when they went for a realistic story line they should have atleast added in the components of Operation Enduring Freedom that were acomplished by allied nations special forces. In most cases operations carried out by tier 1 operators in Afghanistan were undertaken by mixed groups from numerous countries. The taking of Bagram airbase for instance was taken by the British SBS/SAS and the ANA didn't even exist untill the new government was formed in late 2002.
No killcam was the reason I stopped playing... It got way too frustrating being an infantry getting sniped out of nowhere every fucking time and never knowing where they were camping
I personally feel the multiplayer has tons of replay value, even with the lack of game modes. The campaign, although short, was straight to the point of what was going on. There wasn't any twist or turns, just straight up raw warfare....as it was intended to be. That's where COD and BF3 take things a little too far. I personally don't judge games on storyline, I judge on realism, replay value, and graphics. No agrees or disagrees, just simply voicing my opinion.
More guns but am i the only one that think snipers should be nerfed cuz i play bf cod and rare get killed by snipers in moh 95% of deaths r from snipers
Love MOH, but you're right those improvements, would make the gamemuch better, stiil I personallythink that the multyplayer, even having so few modes, is still better than the competion.
Don't agree with the kill cam option, otherwise, there wouldn't be a need for snipers in the game.
moh was devoloped by danger close campaign and dice multiplayer running on unreal 3 engine for campaign and frostbite 1.5 for multilayer but next moh needs to be just danger close making it cause it seems dice dosnt care helping a rival franchise
Hey you guys remeber back in like 2004 medal of honor rising sun that game was awesome i preferred that more than cod but i dont know what happed to medal of honor they need to make good games again
I really liked the campaign but I do agree that they could've polished the game a little more. Plus it's the 1st one of the series and it was really good. You can only get better and I can't wait for the next
No kill cams kill cams are for moons. When a camper kills me I flank him I don't need no kill cam, this ain't cod. I mused the good old days when there were no killcams
MOH for, me at least, succeeded in capturing the realism of the war. The teminology, cool voice acting. Dusty, Deuce, Rabbit, all bad ass fucking characters. Sure, theyre not Soap, or Cpt. Price. But damn it, give EA some points for trying to breath new life into one of theyre franchises. If you cant respect that, then fuck lol
isn't that the original Song from the call of duty series at the end of the video and if its not then can someone tell me what it is and where it is from because it sounds so god damn familiar
SP: MoH 2010s singleplayer was good- but could have been better. Just make it better.
MP: More maps, more guns, better game modes. Do NOT add the killcam, as that is unrealistic. No MoH game has ever had a killcam and the series doesn't need one. Some of the guns... *cough cough* M4 and MP7 should have been patched. Oh, and none of this "if you didn't preorder or get the premium edition then tough luck" crap.
Overall, just polish some things and add more content.
The Graphics were not up to date? Oy Vey! The graphics were a step above Battlefield 2 and that was great at the time. This game looked fantastic compared to several other titles. Im sorry but your comparing this game unfairly. This game was and is an under rated jewel that met somewhere between COD and Battlefield. My only complaints were the lack of depth in multiplayer when it came to unlocks and the severe learning curve which once you got past was one of the reasons you loved it.
I'm going to be perfectly honest, I loved Medal of Honor. Campaign was well written, despite it's realistic nature, and there were varied mission types throughout the whole duration. The music was great and went well with some of the best setpieces of the game. Also I loved the tone of the game, very intense but also collective, compared to COD. MP was decent. I loved the limited destructability of the environments. I agree with your changes however. Also there needs to be more classes/weapons.
MOH2 should be using frostbite 2 or maybe even a better version of Frostbite 2....so graphics should be absolutely beautiful. Campaign does need to be longer...MOH was way too short. CO-OP mode would be sweet. Multiplayer wise....maybe a little larger maps, more player in a match, don't make the missions in the multiplayer so narrow...larger maps should help this....I just like flanking. A camera which shows where the killer is....like in BF3.
um, no. you are so bogus dude, first of all the graphics were ok. you try building a 100 miles game base-ped. then let me see how it looks. second. killcam??? dude, is there a killcam in real life? ah. no, if you cant see the dude, stop playing your game on a shitty tv and upgrade. this game far exceeds any game in the modern game types. dont rip on it man. all it really needs is co op like you said. nothing more.
@117vids Totally agree with you! Great game! Co-op would be epic and just build off the already hardcore realistic gameplay that makes it its own title.
Agreed. I loved this game, both single player and online. More game types, more maps, more dlc updates to keep it fresh. As much as I don't care to have it, give it some sort of Prestige option ala COD. Sometimes some games are just so fun to rank up that you could do it over and over. This is a key factor at helping with longevity. Eliminate the screen tears. Drop Unreal engine and go full Frostbite 2. Keep the lean system for both online and offline. Liking the vids, keep 'em coming.
I agree with all these points. The campaign should be as long, and as epic, as MOH Front Line and MOH Rising Sun (The Best MOH Games Ever) and the online is good, but is lacking many, many modes. The map sizes could be bigger as well (Like BF2 PC was) MOH 2 is a game I look forward 2, so I hope it delivers
I was absolutely disgusted that it didn't have split screen. That was the best part of the earlier MoHs. Otherwise I agree with everything he said, except killcam. If the levels aren't built like shit, you dont need to worry about glitches.
iam sorry but MoH was fucking awesome, so it wasnt CoD enought for you? well boo fucking who i dont care what you say it was fucking epic and as for the npc's guns floating in front of them i never had that problem and as for fps no problems there either just think you are hating on the game tbh
@harper9393 When did I ever say it wasn't "COD" enough? I'm just as sick of COD as everyone else BUT at least COD's fairly polished and the campaign is well designed. Medal of Honor has countless glitches, bugs, and graphic issues that should be fixed. You clearly can't see past your hatred for COD for long enough to actually see MoH for what it is.
@GmoneyProductions29 dude, hate to break it to ya but CoD is literally using the SAME GRAPHICS AS CALL OF DUTY 4... if it feels polished its because they add one of those adreneline pumped campaign scenes and its too fast paced to even notice, the scenes you do get a good look at its not for long and they usually intended you to see it, I honestly hate call of duty and the people who play it b/c whenever i hear a CoD player say a game is recycled its b/c it is and theyre too stupid to notice.
@GmoneyProductions29 No excuses for me bro. I have the exact same view on CoD as you, and i still see MoH as one of the best fps' out there... what system did you play it on? PC, 360, PS3?
Can't wait for a another the fist was awsome loved the story bit short. I would like if they would up the engine and use there own engine for multiplayer and make the gameplay feel less clunky and fake.......But excited non then less
i think you should of added more weapons they should use the frostbite 2 engine and maybe more vehicles but thn it would be to much lik battlefield...i think the graphics are fine you juss mentioned it was glitchy which really hasnt hav anything to do with graphics,yes the story does need to be longer,and the bullets need to be stronger when i shoot an enemy it takes lik 20 bullets to get one kill,they need a hardcore mode to were u can pick a mode instead of just random
@KeygenOSCracker No, BF3 is not MOH2. Thats a prettystupid thing to say. Thats like me saying MOH1 was BFBC3. Just because MOH and BF have similarities doesn't make them spiritual sequels.
I didn't have much of a problem with the graphics; other bits of the games should always gain more attention than them, though they can be important. Medal of Honor really does need a longer campaign, balancing in multiplayer, and some type of local multiplayer/co-op.
@daevildude45 I agree it was byfar the best campaign since COD 4 BF3 has the worst campaign and MW3 doesnt look anymore promissing, I'm just all smiles for GTA V
@daevildude45 Dont listen to that guy, i am just so glad there was another game than CoD and the campaign was great, i think this game was pretty good :D
They are having Co op in new one
JRAD7407 1 day ago
To clarify im not saying activision should do it, i dont want it to be like Call of Duty. I like COD but i dont want to pay $60 to play a knock off. i want medal of honor to be bold and try to make their own unique multiplayer
TheFlingbeeble 2 days ago
Improvements don't have dice make the multiplayer I don't care if medal of honor screws it up it couldn't be any worse than DICE half asked attempt at multiplayer. Also more guns, its a fun game but the lack of variety in guns made it get boring fairly quickly. More pronounced kill streaks when you do support its never really clear what the kill streaks are actually doing. Another reason DICE shouldn't make multiplayer is they need a good multiplayer menu. Battlefield 3 has a shitty one.
TheFlingbeeble 2 days ago
@TheFlingbeeble Yes I agree with you 100%, Dont let dice touch nothing let dice worry about BF3. Danger close needs to put more effort into this game. The first one was not bad at all, I enjoyed it and still play it today, however it can get boring really fast due to very little guns and MAPS for sure needs way more maps this time.
bigcat204 23 hours ago
you make it sound like it should be more like a COD than a realistic game like Battlefield
HSGblacksabbath 2 days ago
If they play there cards right with the new medal of honor who knows... It could be better than cod and battlefield... Im kinda looking forward to it...
DankDroBlunt1 2 days ago
@DankDroBlunt1 Iv been saying this for a while, all they have to do is put more effort then they did in the last one and we could have a winner. I think this will be the COD killer this time, I have that feeling.
bigcat204 23 hours ago
I think the reason the gun is floating by his chest is because in the military many people use chest rigs utilizing slings to attach the gun to themselves. That way they can let go of the gun but also have quick access to if they have to grab it again rather than have to set it down somewhere. It dangles in front of them.
DeltaMartialArt 3 days ago
one of the BIGGEST things Medal of Honor 2 is MORE MULTIPLAYER MAPS!!!
the first one only had about 4 or 5 maps
GH05TLYR4NG3R 3 days ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Why does everyone bitch about not enough weapons in? There are over 20 weapons in this game. If your gonna bitch about snipers, find away around them, they're not OP. (Btw im a spec ops player), If you add too much it ruins the game. the first MOh was perfect the way it was post patch. Stop bitching about killl cam, learn the map.
SNOOZER4569885 4 days ago
more guns like scar or G36 would b nice and more maps and optics like the ones in the story also the single fire function in multi-player
Fa110nFac3 4 days ago
And in case anyone is wondering, during this years GDC (Game Developers Conference) is when they will show off some gameplay for Medal of Honor: Warfighter using Frostbite 2. GDC 2012 starts March (next month) so we won't have to wait long. It's release date is October 2012.
reesenc 4 days ago
And for Warfighter they're using the Frostbite 2 for Singleplayer and Multiplayer. But the multiplayer will be handled by Danger Close this time, not DICE.
reesenc 4 days ago
go on Wikipedia and type in MOH: Warfighter... the sequel! YAY
poopstain742 5 days ago
also you need to be able to lie down. in medal of honor you cant lie down which is pretty stupid if you ask me
dbo124 5 days ago
1: Forstbite 2 needs to be put in both SP and MP
2: Definately needs a CO-OP mode
3: Campaign should be a little longer kind of like BF3
4: Needs more weapons in MP
5: Navy SEAL's need to be in SP again!
6: Last the SP should be based on some true events
TheBaldeagle009 5 days ago
Better voice chat
RocketBass1839 5 days ago
MOH > CoD the end
Phantom100100 5 days ago
1) graphics up to today's standards? I'd say they fare better than the last few CoD games released 2) campaign needs to be longer? CoD doesnt play by this, beat MW3 in 4 and a half hours. 3) It doesnt necessarily need more multiplayer modes, but stronger ones sure. Most of the modes in the CoD games the vast majority of players never touch, I doubt they would be missed. 4) Kill cam didnt help camping any in CoD, its still the campiest game out there and 5) Co-op, the only good point you made.
downphoenix 6 days ago
Killcams are for noobs
dannykanes 6 days ago
No more one shot bolt action snipers hated that most about the game
Tealghost2011 6 days ago
@Tealghost2011 I know right...I hate how players die after a single shot of a 7.62x54mm round...you need at least two shots to make it more realistic.
dohcholliday23 6 days ago
No kill cam- Like previously said learn the map
Also co-op and a spec ops missions would make sense
I agree it needs to be polished, the graphics weren't that good. The new engine would definitely help immerse people in the game if they can fix the bugs
The amount of weapons were fine The maps need to be larger, firefights now in days are at a pretty long distance
The game modes were fine, same amount if not more than bf3
TrueTacticia 6 days ago
you want to play medal of honor two?!?!? play battlefail.. exact same thing
417coty 1 week ago
@417coty yeah you should know because MOH 2 came out already.
pugalakan 6 days ago
medal of honor is a great games just needs some toneing up like: yes more guns, maybe killcams better score chains. but the campaign was amazing!!!!!
Handsomegrenade 1 week ago
Campaign (bold & underlined). Yes, MOH 2 needs a great deal of focus on single-player & polish (& coop too, I suppose). As far as multi-player goes, I'm way too happy with EA's sister title to ever abandon it, so the opportunity cost of a persuasive multi-player would be far too great to even be worth it. I hope to see a longer/better campaign (minus the Pre-rendered officer-general back-&-forth) and a bit more polish.
CieloPerso 1 week ago
Tbh I bought moh just because I was really pleased with bf3, but I foibd it kinda odd that moh at some points looked way way better than bf3 graphics
XvictorX0 1 week ago
I loved the canpaign, I disagree the graphics were quite impressive
FemaleDogBoner 1 week ago
@FemaleDogBoner nice username
aymendrk 1 week ago
cant wait for the next one
roachmikemoo 1 week ago
Not get stuck in the loading screens
More maps for Conquest? ( The one with helmand valley)
Animations
NO PERKS
hit boxes can have some improvement
BorntoSEAL 2 weeks ago
After battliefield 3, if they do make a medal of honor 2 there only going backwards. DICE did sweet fuck all to address the issues in the multiplayer. Sure the campaign was good but it failed on the multiplayer side big time
Infurnas 2 weeks ago
it's killing me that I can't remember where the opening music is from
klampcamper 2 weeks ago
@klampcamper The movie Inception
spedward100 1 week ago
@spedward100 thx :) I never actually saw inception so I guess I just heard it from a trailer and forgot where it was from
klampcamper 1 week ago
More guns
GuitarKirillable 2 weeks ago
The campaign was amazing as far as the story goes! But now they have frostbite 2 which means we do not have to worry about the graphics. But back to my point the campaign had a great story and for once was basing it in current times. Fightong Talibans just adds that great set apart from any bad CoD game.
KTFHDVIDS 2 weeks ago
more, game modes, maps, "guns," and co op.
metesables 2 weeks ago
for consoles they should add more players like around 24 vs 24
LetsCutSomePie 3 weeks ago 7
@LetsCutSomePie 24 would be too many unless they triple the size of the maps....which will essentially turn it into BF3.not good.Just give us more maps..the current map size is just fine.
originaldelta 2 weeks ago
@originaldelta they might have to due to the new frostbite 2 engine
LetsCutSomePie 2 weeks ago
Multiplayer was very fun u just neded to be more tactical to play it unliike cod
loneranger886 3 weeks ago
FROSTBITE 3
3xKAI 3 weeks ago
MOH had better graphics than Black Ops.Period.
MOH had a better singleplayer plot than Black Ops
MOH had better sound and voice overs than Black Ops.
COD campaigns are'nt any longer than MOH SP.
Killcam is for noobs..Learn the map.
I agree on co-op and definitely more objective based game modes.
originaldelta 3 weeks ago 31
@originaldelta do you know if people still play on 360 and if it doesn't kill yo or anyone who read this see if there is
flameheat1000 2 weeks ago
@flameheat100 yes ppl still play on X box and the PS3...and very few on the PC.
originaldelta 2 weeks ago
@originaldelta As much as the campaign for medal of honor was good it wasnt better than black ops,this coming from a battlefield 3 vet
Infurnas 2 weeks ago
@Infurnas for the singleplayer...IMHO,MOH got it right..they took an actual event in an ongoing war..depicted it pretty accurately,they actually had active duty personnel walk them through the development process...everything from the score to the their use of actual live taping of live fire to replicate the real thing...Black ops was more arcadey not as immersive.
But again thats just my take..I have both games.
originaldelta 2 weeks ago
@originaldelta I DISSAGREE ON THE SINGELPLAYER PLOT PART BUT ALL THE OTHERS ARE TRUE
ayahalom 1 week ago
@originaldelta MOH is way beter than COD and BF..just one thing more guns! and kill cam is needed for COD only because there is around 1 mil cheaters! have seen just one on MOH!
fkum8it 1 week ago
@originaldelta kill yourself and buy glasses to see the graphics of cod black ops
agukratos13 5 days ago
@agukratos13 COD black ops sits in my DVD tower collecting dust...don't play it anymore thank you.
originaldelta 5 days ago
@originaldelta MOH sucked period they need to improve a lot.
iPopNades 4 days ago
@originaldelta i think there should be killcams, theres no many snipers in moh. its too much
TheCornguy 3 days ago
@TheCornguy The only reason you had so many snipers is because of severl factors.
1. OSK any range
2. No bullet drop time
These two factors have to be tweeked, If they make it OSK to the head only then you will see less snipers.
bigcat204 23 hours ago
@originaldelta how can you learn the map... without killcam
darthvaderism 2 days ago
@darthvaderism I know the sniping spots so I make an effort to avoid their lines of sight..thats how you avoid getting sniped all the time.Don't stand out in the open and use cover
originaldelta 1 day ago
@originaldelta So true man.
COLTxPYTHON 9 hours ago
DOES ANYBODY KNOW THE SONG IN THE VERY BEGINNING INTRO? Thanks.
BumperJumperFilms 3 weeks ago
@BumperJumperFilms Time by Hans Zimmer
Longbow1113 2 weeks ago
@Longbow1113 Thanks, man.
BumperJumperFilms 1 week ago
Comment removed
Game1Legends 3 weeks ago
Well how about you let the company do there job without a silly video like this telling them how to do their job. Just saying
tom241291 3 weeks ago
They should ask Spielberg to come up with a story and help them visualize the game's look. I agree, the 2010 Medal of Honor's visuals needed to be polished and the game could have used more time in production to do that. The multiplayer is confusing and needed a wide variety of match types like what Halo has.
joberfeld113 3 weeks ago
medal of honor to me was just a multiplayer beta with unlimited time for bf3, but thats all i got it for
wnorton13 3 weeks ago
Some old memories i had with this game (;
Elchicano34 3 weeks ago
Frostbite 2 and larger maps. No big need for vehicles but needs less camping although I did enjoy the multiplayer after I learned how to play it. I thought the multiplayer graphics were the best I've seen including bf3. More customization as well...on all fronts. Needs to be interesting enough to last until bc3.
SlimCargo 3 weeks ago
well the floating gun thing wasnt that big of deal. he could have been using a wolftail on his weapon.
kemlight 1 month ago
The Campaign should have been longer but the Battle of Takur Ghar only lasted 2 Days I believe... at least they based everything on actual events and people
Iceman5164 1 month ago
get a pc and maybe you can see the buety of the game in max settings.
MegaTimebomb098 1 month ago
the first problem is play it on xbox then for no reason at all it will be better
clough211 1 month ago
When is MOH 2 scheduled for release?
ugatube 1 month ago
@ugatube October possible november or september expect it to be a e3 2012
clough211 1 month ago
@ugatube I would say very close to around the same time Cod: Black Ops 2 comes out... which will probably be during the fall of this year. And yes I heard Black Ops 2 is the confirmed name of Treyarch's next CoD game... Unless I'm wrong, in which case MoH2 will most likely be around the same time as Treyarch's next CoD game whatever it will really be called. It seems that the Treyarch CoD games and MoH come out around the same time, which makes for some good competition between EA and Actvision.
ebpianodude 3 weeks ago
@ugatube I just heard that MoH 2 is due out for an October release of this year, but that might not happen as no exact release date has been given by MoH's publisher EA Games is busy with other release due out this year which of course includes a new MVP Baseball, Madden, FIFA Soccer, and NHL.
joberfeld113 3 weeks ago
Graphics were perfect
NotTheColourSilver 1 month ago
I'm sorry.. dated graphics? what?
failtolawl 1 month ago
moh2 is pretty much being made by battlefield 3 there using frostbite 2 engine and battlefield 3 physics
NeonChief 1 month ago
I think battlefield and medal of honor should have lobbies like call of duty where you can do anything from it basically.
MarkingItUp15 1 month ago 2
And it needs more maps for Combat Mission
JeffHardyRocks3000 1 month ago
I think the game is perfect and always will be perfect it just needs more guns and can't wait for 2 because the campaign is freaking awesome!
JeffHardyRocks3000 1 month ago
2nd an mpc can carry a gun on it's chest while it's opening a door with something called IDK A SLING!
MrAwesomesauce101 1 month ago
We don't need a FFA btw because It's obvious that this game tries to be realistic and FFA in a war zone like Afghanistan isn't exactly realistic.
MrAwesomesauce101 1 month ago
I really don't know weather they should use unreal engine 3 or frostbite 2. I personally think unreal engine 3 is better from seeing what it can to with samartian.
MrAwesomesauce101 1 month ago
Medal of Honor has really good graphics.
IIAndy1994II 1 month ago
1 Improvement MoH 2's MP needs above all else - To not be a CoD clone. Believe it or not, folks, you don't need to be exactly like CoD to compete with it.
Further more, do not let DICE develope it. At all. Rather, let Dangerclose develope it instead. Yeah sure, Battlefield is fun. But quite frankly I'd much rather see the gameplay elements that were in the campaign translated over to the multiplayer portion over DICE's lazy emulation of CoD with ported BC2 animations/assets like MoH 2010 had.
msc204x 1 month ago
Imma get to the point.
I enjoyed MOH more than BF3.
Yes the graphics are better on BF3, but the story on it kinda sucked.
MOH was amazing! Graphics were really good compared to Black Ops when they both came out.
Multiplayer, yes a killcam would be helpful because many did camp.
Why didnt I keep the game? Cuz alot of camping in multiplayer and it only took me 12 days to get Platinum.
shaggiapple 1 month ago
Indeed, Medal of Honor 1 did have the potential to be a great FPS, so we're hoping that Medal of Honor 2 foes better.
gamer6654 1 month ago
I thought MoH was overall good the only problems I had was the fact that the bolt action amulets were really powerful compared to the other guns and without a kill cam of some sort they could easily camp
MRxY3TI 1 month ago
Holy shit Graphics were great even now if u compare it to mw3 its a lot better, the big problem was multiplayer - too much loading time, no perks, very little weapons/customization, very few maps for the money, lags.
127prats 1 month ago
Does this game give anyone else a headache?
MrJose707 1 month ago
and please add more guns,kill streak,a kill cam, and more teams like marines,navyseal,rangers...etc improve the snipers so that its one shot one kill if it in the chest are upper.add some perks to make the game more interesting.and make the game a bit more longer.otherwise from these minor things the game have a awsome story line that is waaay better than madern warfare 2.I love medal of honor I got all the games they come out with and I know it they first online but i hope they improve the game
princeAJ101 1 month ago
I wiould love if they get ride of the whole fucking rank up thing they got going for the online. they should have a rank up system like madern warfare. because i think it foolish to of to get 2000 points for a scope or a silencer. I hope the next one they come out with is better.they should make it so that you can rank up to like 75 max, and as you rank up you unlock different guns and perks. and when you used those guns you unlock different things for them. that would be so much better.
princeAJ101 1 month ago
current multiplayer is kick ass, don't want or need killcam, if you're sick of getting sniped all the time then duh, don't run around in the open like a dumbass ...
SilverShamrock71 1 month ago
MoH campaign story was good but when they went for a realistic story line they should have atleast added in the components of Operation Enduring Freedom that were acomplished by allied nations special forces. In most cases operations carried out by tier 1 operators in Afghanistan were undertaken by mixed groups from numerous countries. The taking of Bagram airbase for instance was taken by the British SBS/SAS and the ANA didn't even exist untill the new government was formed in late 2002.
randymchorny 1 month ago
No killcam was the reason I stopped playing... It got way too frustrating being an infantry getting sniped out of nowhere every fucking time and never knowing where they were camping
A7XmaNbeaRpiG 1 month ago
i liked this game but i classify my games as 3 types
Type A games Ex.: assassin's creed series, call of duty series, BF3, etc
Type B games Ex.: MoH, Bulletstorm, etc
Piss offs: turok,duke nukem, etc
in conclusion your right as it's classified as a type b (in my opinion) cant wait for medal of honor 2 though
mikegau44 1 month ago
I personally feel the multiplayer has tons of replay value, even with the lack of game modes. The campaign, although short, was straight to the point of what was going on. There wasn't any twist or turns, just straight up raw warfare....as it was intended to be. That's where COD and BF3 take things a little too far. I personally don't judge games on storyline, I judge on realism, replay value, and graphics. No agrees or disagrees, just simply voicing my opinion.
Urfucted249 1 month ago
but the game is shot ..
lokeshsinghnaruto 2 months ago
i love the game ...
lokeshsinghnaruto 2 months ago
Operation Geronimo in MoH2???
MrWsabi11 2 months ago
More guns but am i the only one that think snipers should be nerfed cuz i play bf cod and rare get killed by snipers in moh 95% of deaths r from snipers
BBallBoy506 2 months ago
Love MOH, but you're right those improvements, would make the gamemuch better, stiil I personallythink that the multyplayer, even having so few modes, is still better than the competion.
Don't agree with the kill cam option, otherwise, there wouldn't be a need for snipers in the game.
PSPTSHT 2 months ago
and remember MORE GUNS!!!!!!!!!!
TheBootieChrist 2 months ago 22
moh was devoloped by danger close campaign and dice multiplayer running on unreal 3 engine for campaign and frostbite 1.5 for multilayer but next moh needs to be just danger close making it cause it seems dice dosnt care helping a rival franchise
bearcatjew223 2 months ago
improvement #6: Frostbite 2.0 + 2 extra years of development time
SupFag1 2 months ago
this game is awesome, campaign and multiplayer, only thing 2 needs is more maps on multiplayer
corehustle 2 months ago
Hey you guys remeber back in like 2004 medal of honor rising sun that game was awesome i preferred that more than cod but i dont know what happed to medal of honor they need to make good games again
snake147532 2 months ago
i love the campain but it was to short
nielsbroekers 2 months ago
Love this game! Got mw n bf3 but always go back to this game!
gggfolkz 2 months ago
I think it should have split-screen coop
But NO kill cam i mean its much more realistic than having one thats one of the best features in the game i think
nattelol24 2 months ago
Lol complaining about the graphics. Look at CoD.
Scorponizer 2 months ago
More players in game
FunkkyPanda69 2 months ago
When I listen to the beginning of your video I feel like I'm watching Inception... I'm dreaming aren't I?
thedanielawesome 2 months ago
I really liked the campaign but I do agree that they could've polished the game a little more. Plus it's the 1st one of the series and it was really good. You can only get better and I can't wait for the next
Asoccerman123 2 months ago
No kill cams kill cams are for moons. When a camper kills me I flank him I don't need no kill cam, this ain't cod. I mused the good old days when there were no killcams
pavelmdify 2 months ago
Top 5 changes for MOH2:
5. More polish
4: More guns
3: Better class system, like special equipment for certain classes (kinda like Battlefield)
2: Post-launch support (Those snipers are still one-hit kills...)
1. Retweek the support actions (It's a good idea, but it encourages camping, it must be redone).
Darius135gease 2 months ago
Go play fucking cod. Dice games aren't for you.
narCable 2 months ago
MOH for, me at least, succeeded in capturing the realism of the war. The teminology, cool voice acting. Dusty, Deuce, Rabbit, all bad ass fucking characters. Sure, theyre not Soap, or Cpt. Price. But damn it, give EA some points for trying to breath new life into one of theyre franchises. If you cant respect that, then fuck lol
Joewrestler152 2 months ago
Do you wanna know what i want in M.O.H. 2? i want some recoil in the GUNZ. because without recoil the GUNZ are crap
Subscribe371 2 months ago
Hit boxing. Holy shitballs it was bad on MOH1
ridgiesrule 2 months ago
isn't that the original Song from the call of duty series at the end of the video and if its not then can someone tell me what it is and where it is from because it sounds so god damn familiar
51mrallen 3 months ago
The following should be fixed:
SP: MoH 2010s singleplayer was good- but could have been better. Just make it better.
MP: More maps, more guns, better game modes. Do NOT add the killcam, as that is unrealistic. No MoH game has ever had a killcam and the series doesn't need one. Some of the guns... *cough cough* M4 and MP7 should have been patched. Oh, and none of this "if you didn't preorder or get the premium edition then tough luck" crap.
Overall, just polish some things and add more content.
meator30 3 months ago
MP needs way better maps than the first one.
IAmJawz 3 months ago
The Graphics were not up to date? Oy Vey! The graphics were a step above Battlefield 2 and that was great at the time. This game looked fantastic compared to several other titles. Im sorry but your comparing this game unfairly. This game was and is an under rated jewel that met somewhere between COD and Battlefield. My only complaints were the lack of depth in multiplayer when it came to unlocks and the severe learning curve which once you got past was one of the reasons you loved it.
JeanVlogg 3 months ago
I'm going to be perfectly honest, I loved Medal of Honor. Campaign was well written, despite it's realistic nature, and there were varied mission types throughout the whole duration. The music was great and went well with some of the best setpieces of the game. Also I loved the tone of the game, very intense but also collective, compared to COD. MP was decent. I loved the limited destructability of the environments. I agree with your changes however. Also there needs to be more classes/weapons.
UrchineSLICE 3 months ago
Comment removed
MrDuit1000 3 months ago
MOH2 should be using frostbite 2 or maybe even a better version of Frostbite 2....so graphics should be absolutely beautiful. Campaign does need to be longer...MOH was way too short. CO-OP mode would be sweet. Multiplayer wise....maybe a little larger maps, more player in a match, don't make the missions in the multiplayer so narrow...larger maps should help this....I just like flanking. A camera which shows where the killer is....like in BF3.
nolanthom842910 3 months ago
um, no. you are so bogus dude, first of all the graphics were ok. you try building a 100 miles game base-ped. then let me see how it looks. second. killcam??? dude, is there a killcam in real life? ah. no, if you cant see the dude, stop playing your game on a shitty tv and upgrade. this game far exceeds any game in the modern game types. dont rip on it man. all it really needs is co op like you said. nothing more.
117vids 3 months ago
@117vids Totally agree with you! Great game! Co-op would be epic and just build off the already hardcore realistic gameplay that makes it its own title.
JeanVlogg 3 months ago
Agreed. I loved this game, both single player and online. More game types, more maps, more dlc updates to keep it fresh. As much as I don't care to have it, give it some sort of Prestige option ala COD. Sometimes some games are just so fun to rank up that you could do it over and over. This is a key factor at helping with longevity. Eliminate the screen tears. Drop Unreal engine and go full Frostbite 2. Keep the lean system for both online and offline. Liking the vids, keep 'em coming.
1Nynja 3 months ago in playlist More videos from GmoneyProductions29
I agree with all these points. The campaign should be as long, and as epic, as MOH Front Line and MOH Rising Sun (The Best MOH Games Ever) and the online is good, but is lacking many, many modes. The map sizes could be bigger as well (Like BF2 PC was) MOH 2 is a game I look forward 2, so I hope it delivers
TruroCityBoy 3 months ago
i liked the campaign not so much on the MP
TheKlown82 3 months ago
@CokeColaForTheWin danger close didnt have a choice in the multiplayer
daevildude45 4 months ago
More MP maps
More guns
Better graphics
CO Op campaign
Longer Campaign
More destruction
zang124 4 months ago
I was absolutely disgusted that it didn't have split screen. That was the best part of the earlier MoHs. Otherwise I agree with everything he said, except killcam. If the levels aren't built like shit, you dont need to worry about glitches.
Shaby18 4 months ago
iam sorry but MoH was fucking awesome, so it wasnt CoD enought for you? well boo fucking who i dont care what you say it was fucking epic and as for the npc's guns floating in front of them i never had that problem and as for fps no problems there either just think you are hating on the game tbh
harper9393 4 months ago 9
@harper9393 When did I ever say it wasn't "COD" enough? I'm just as sick of COD as everyone else BUT at least COD's fairly polished and the campaign is well designed. Medal of Honor has countless glitches, bugs, and graphic issues that should be fixed. You clearly can't see past your hatred for COD for long enough to actually see MoH for what it is.
GmoneyProductions29 4 months ago
@GmoneyProductions29 dude, hate to break it to ya but CoD is literally using the SAME GRAPHICS AS CALL OF DUTY 4... if it feels polished its because they add one of those adreneline pumped campaign scenes and its too fast paced to even notice, the scenes you do get a good look at its not for long and they usually intended you to see it, I honestly hate call of duty and the people who play it b/c whenever i hear a CoD player say a game is recycled its b/c it is and theyre too stupid to notice.
milkwetcookies 2 months ago
@GmoneyProductions29 The only reason COD seems polished, is because they keep using the same engine, game after game.
MasterADG1 2 months ago
@GmoneyProductions29 how many people play killznoe 3 online pls answer!
davidisfunky 1 month ago in playlist Uploaded videos
@GmoneyProductions29 I can't see what glitches you were mad about they were nothing that couldn't be fixed by a patch.
MrAwesomesauce101 1 month ago
@GmoneyProductions29 No excuses for me bro. I have the exact same view on CoD as you, and i still see MoH as one of the best fps' out there... what system did you play it on? PC, 360, PS3?
SynsterGatesA7X 1 month ago
@harper9393 Haha, you got owned by Gmoney, you idiotic fucktard.
dekuscrubbyfan888 4 months ago
@harper9393 COD enough? You mean COD isn't MoH enough idiot the people at Infinity Ward who made COD made the original Medal of Honors.
HeadSHOT604 3 months ago
@harper9393
Let's hear it for another fag who desperately wants to jump onboard the hate bandwagon for CoD.
Catmangamer 2 months ago
Wait there's a 2nd MoH??
koreankid113 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@koreankid113 No, but there's some sort of a teaser in the Battlefield 3 package.
joaovictor1994 4 months ago
Can't wait for a another the fist was awsome loved the story bit short. I would like if they would up the engine and use there own engine for multiplayer and make the gameplay feel less clunky and fake.......But excited non then less
killian31175 4 months ago
i think you should of added more weapons they should use the frostbite 2 engine and maybe more vehicles but thn it would be to much lik battlefield...i think the graphics are fine you juss mentioned it was glitchy which really hasnt hav anything to do with graphics,yes the story does need to be longer,and the bullets need to be stronger when i shoot an enemy it takes lik 20 bullets to get one kill,they need a hardcore mode to were u can pick a mode instead of just random
MaggotMayhemOfficial 4 months ago
I think something like from TF2 would be nice: A death cam that only zooms in on who killed you, rather than show what they were doing.
JohnForester15 4 months ago
the graphics dont look bad to me
morganrd5 4 months ago
MoH was a raffle ticket for BF3 earliest beta release.
christon0123 5 months ago
Isnt Bf3 moh2?
KeygenOSCracker 5 months ago
@KeygenOSCracker No.
jang270467149o 5 months ago
Yh.
KeygenOSCracker 5 months ago
@KeygenOSCracker No, BF3 is not MOH2. Thats a prettystupid thing to say. Thats like me saying MOH1 was BFBC3. Just because MOH and BF have similarities doesn't make them spiritual sequels.
jang270467149o 5 months ago
Agreed 100%!
civilwarfare101 5 months ago
I didn't have much of a problem with the graphics; other bits of the games should always gain more attention than them, though they can be important. Medal of Honor really does need a longer campaign, balancing in multiplayer, and some type of local multiplayer/co-op.
crazyfooInc 5 months ago
sometimes i feel like the only person that loved the campaign for this game
daevildude45 5 months ago 29
@daevildude45 you might be... lol. it wasnt awful. but i certainly didn't love it.
GmoneyProductions29 5 months ago
@GmoneyProductions29 campaign was fucking amazing, shame on u for not loving it. Faggot
huttylion 2 months ago
@daevildude45 I loved the campaign too..
OrcCommentaries 5 months ago
@daevildude45 you're not the only one :)
tematchi 5 months ago
@daevildude45 I heard about people like you. I think 4 other people also exist and liked it.
Wutan87 4 months ago
@daevildude45 Your not alone! I've played this campaign over dozens of times.
MrW0LfMaN 4 months ago
@daevildude45 I agree it was byfar the best campaign since COD 4 BF3 has the worst campaign and MW3 doesnt look anymore promissing, I'm just all smiles for GTA V
GeerboxHD 4 months ago
@daevildude45 Dont listen to that guy, i am just so glad there was another game than CoD and the campaign was great, i think this game was pretty good :D
MrCoolSpoiler 2 months ago
In stead of skill in that game, how about a rank system
sagizilla 5 months ago
It needs a lot more weapons!
Comander555666 5 months ago