They should've kept the precise weight required to mimic an exact recreation of a real event, taking off the heavy engine from that truck will of course blow it away like a toy & won't fit the scale.
Some of the murders by the German BND, the ex GESTAPO, known to the public:
Uwe Barschel (politician), Jürgen Möllemann (politician), Heiner Gehring (author), Martina Pflock (political activist), Tron (internet activist), Karl Koch (political/internet activist), Bernd Seiffert (human rights activist), Kirsten Heisig (author/judge), Fritz Bauer (persecutor of the Frankfurt Auschwitz processes), Markus Bott (human rights activist).
Google the names and check out my channel and homepage.
Truck: Lalalalalala uh oh AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHH *blows into a few pieces* OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH
I saw a B-52 do that to a fully loaded Chevy Step-Van. Rolled the damn thing 1/4 mile down the flightline. The weight don't make a bit of difference. The point is "Don't Do It!!!"
I watched a catering truck drive behind a Leftansa 747 at dfw back in the 90's and it took that truck airborne with taxi thrust only! The truck rolled several times then they had to cut the dazed driver free. He was ok.
would love to stand behind one... if i maneged to stay up and not being airborne would the wind of the thrust rip my flash of my bones ?? if thats the case nvm than i dont wanna be behind one
so, not only can you not understand that the narrator said this was i staged demonstration, but you also clearly, cannot see that the truck was empty, and was being towed by a firetruck. Really, did you even watch the video?
Yeah...okay you asian fuck. Maybe you should stop trying to be american...with your english wannabe slang and shit. Go smoke more opium and go fuck Buddha.
Yea, the engine didn't matter I don't think, but why not leave the engine in there for a more accurate demo. But then again, thats why we are becoming a second rate country. We do things half-assed
Well there are not many scenarios I can think of where ground service vehicles would be driving behind jet engines at that sort of thrust. Around terminals and taxiing, jets are usually just at taxi idle or breakaway thrust which 4/5 of fuck all compared to the demo.
pfft... @ 1:15, you can clearly see the truck doesnt even have an engine, not that it would make that much difference, but still... cheap demo... may as well use a kite
@magamka since whens did anyone in US stop enjoy blowing shit up...
bottom line is, its a half ass'd test and i did say that it wouldnt make any difference if it did have an engine... doesnt mean it also had to have full tank of fuel... but it wouldve been a tad more exciting if it did :)
@algolake The clip saying saying 'staged demonstration' would be more so drama queens like yourself dont think someones actually in the truck , smashed around and about to drown etc... my point was basically that the truck is way lighter than its meant to be, thus being thrown around more dramatically. What appears to be a truck is only a rolling shell Vs a jet engine. Get it?
After studying the CSI data, and observing and noting the affected perimeter, we can conclude categorically that:
American Airlines Flight 77 DID NOT strike the Pentagon on Sept. 11, 2001.
Thank you so much for this post! It is scientific proof that what happened the morning of 9/11 was not due to a Commercial Airliner striking the Pentagon at low level altitude traveling at approx. 500+ mph, but rather something of a DIFFERENT nature -- like a missle strike!
Texas Tech University in Lubbock, Texas has got to get themselves a nice jet engine. If just two jet engines can push 50+ tons of steel through the sky at nearly 500 miles per hour, even one jet engine would have absolutely no problem simulating the winds in a violent tornado, such as the one that hit Oklahoma City on May 3, 1999.
I believe this would happen. But I would like to point out this is just frame and body, there was no motor inside that truck. But, I realize the same effect would happen. Powerful.
Jet engines use fans with lots of very small blades (look at the start of the vid). Unless that guy was about 1 cm thick he would have trouble fitting trough.
Jet engines are also designed to cut meat and bones without taking damage so it isn't destroyed when the plane eats up a bird during flight (which will be cut into finger wide slices)
Maybe hes referring to the accident on the USS Theodore Roosevelt. A guy was sucked in and did live but he didnt come out the other side. He didnt even touch the blades which is of course the only way anyone could survive something like that.
PLEASE DONT READ THIS. YOU WILL GET KISSED ON THE NEAREST POSSIBLE FRIDAY BY THE LOVE OF YOUR%uFEFF LIFE. TOMORROW WILL BE THE BEST DAY OF YOUR LIFE. HOWEVER IF YOU DONT POST THIS COMMENT TO AT LEAST 3 VIDEOS YOU WILL DIE WITHIN 2 DAYS. NOW UV STARTED READIN DIS DUNT STOP THIS IS SO SCARY. SEND THIS OVER TO 5 VIDEOS IN 143 MINUTES WHEN UR DONE PRESS F6 AND UR CRUSHES NAME WILL APPEAR ON THE SCREEN IN BIG LETTERS. THIS IS SO SCARY BECAUSE IT ACTUALLY WORKS
the pw4062 on the 747-400 is 63,300lb of thrust and the gecf6-80c2b5f has 62,100lb of thrust so omid check your books because this is what it says in the boeing website because this is the thrust for the 747-400
Boeing's website lists the best engine option. Not all companies buy their jets with top-of-the-line options. United Airlines 747-400s use PW4056, which produce 56,700 lbs. of thrust. Most 747-400s use PW4056 or CF6-80C2B1F.
if truck has a a engine or not it will still get blown away because this a 767-200 of united that each eangine produces 62,100 pounds of thrust so 62,100+62,100= 124,200 pounds of thurst in total
your dead wrong. The 747-400's engine make only 58000 pounds of trust, so how could the 767 make more than a 747 lol. just look at the size difference.
The 767-200 uses a more powerful engine (General Electric CF6-80C2) because it relies on only TWO engines for its heavy, extended range operations. The 747 divides its power demand among four engines, so each one doesn't need to make as much thrust.
The 777 does it in spades, using the GE90-115B1 engine, with thrust ranging from 74,000 to 115,000 lb. The 767 is still the transcontinental/transatlantic workhorse of many airlines, like Continental (which doesn't operate ANY 747s). When comparing the 747/767, remember, it's not the size of the airplane that matters, it's the size of the engine. Also, too, the 767's engines are a newer design than the standard CF6s on most 747s.
Fuck even if you had tons of lead weights in the bad of the truck and Rosie o Donell driving it would still flip the truck. Might not blow it as far away though.
right ! i did see that episode, and i thought it was (busted) it blew the plastic off the car,... but they did not use a real jet !! just the engine. i don't know ? you got me .
The reason the myth was busted on mythbusters is because they couldn't use full size engines that put out REAL power. the little engines they used were made to simulate wind for special effects not true thrust.
no matter how many things they leave in the truck or bus or take it those General Electric cf-6-80c12df will blow the bus and truck away because it has a thrust of 62,100 pounds of thrust more than the Airbus A300 jetliner the Boeing 767 carries different types of engines General Electric Rolls Royce and Pratt and Whitney GE IS THE HIGLY USED ENGINE IN THE 767
The truck had no engine. That's approx 20% of the vehicles weight. Probably no fuel tank, and who knows what else they stripped out. I'd like to see a real world situation, not a phony dramatization.
once again like i always mention in this forum this is a 767-300ER commercial airliner and it has a thrust of 62,100 pounds of thrust that's powerful enough to cause damage to a house or a fence and yes it will blow away a tank imagine that it has 2 747 engines
Modern ones do, but they are big high-bypass turbofans (a lot of the air they take in just slips right through the cowling-note that in some shots you can see daylight through them-and the engine basically sucks the plane through the air) that physically wouldn't fit in a sleek fighter-size airframe. Fighter turbofan engines have a much lower bypass and get most of their power from their afterburners-much more responsive than the big airliner engines, but it just guzzles fuel when they are lit!
Well i mean a 747 engine what do they use pratt and whittney or something like that compared to a after burning engine like say that on a Mig-31 or F-15 or better yet a SR-71
well garrapata 8008 that is not going to happen it will be a catastrophe and the city and state and airline and the manufacturer will get in trouble and they will be in court for a long time
i love to see what it would do to a geo metro. actually i like to see some "retired" engines at work you know where you don't have to care about saving the engine and strike it up and try to get an object through it watching the engine and the object blast into pieces.
for brmk listen dude grow up okay is only a video okay nothing of what you saying about social skills make sense because what people should read about is jet engines in this video so stop defending so much bbmd okay he can speak for himself and all i said was a challenege question and stated that facts abot the engines so you sir brmwk you need to stop having issues cause that make you look like a little kid okay thank you
once again to mention to the people that don't understand this stage demonstration or think that it can't happen for real anything that gets in the way of the engine exhaust of the turbofan engine no matter what version you name it from rb-211's to ge90-115b it will blow a fire truck away sorry to disappoint you bbbd okay any by the way i do read up on jet engines since you think you are so smart mr know it all bbbd how much power does a GE90-92 TURBOFAN ENGINE PRODUCE?
Read up on social skills; as they, more than book smarts, will enable you to not only survive the 'real world', but also get along with people; a quality you seem to be lacking.
No engine in the truck!
Xman44x 4 months ago
They should've kept the precise weight required to mimic an exact recreation of a real event, taking off the heavy engine from that truck will of course blow it away like a toy & won't fit the scale.
worldwildwest 6 months ago
that truck was like a paper tissue to that plane...........sneeze god bless yu truck
17Drakefan 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Some of the murders by the German BND, the ex GESTAPO, known to the public:
Uwe Barschel (politician), Jürgen Möllemann (politician), Heiner Gehring (author), Martina Pflock (political activist), Tron (internet activist), Karl Koch (political/internet activist), Bernd Seiffert (human rights activist), Kirsten Heisig (author/judge), Fritz Bauer (persecutor of the Frankfurt Auschwitz processes), Markus Bott (human rights activist).
Google the names and check out my channel and homepage.
wwwtotalitaerde 6 months ago
thats what you get when missing with the jet!!! the truck thrown out like a piece of paper....
volikoto 6 months ago
Truck: Lalalalalala uh oh AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHH *blows into a few pieces* OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH
trevormuollo24 1 year ago
Truck: Lalalalalala uh oh AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHH *blows into a few pieces*
trevormuollo24 1 year ago
the power a jet engine very threatening to us i wonder what happened to the fire truck when the cheap hunk of metal got blown into the water?
ghettoperson257 1 year ago
Hahahaha chuck norris hair dryer thats hilarious!!!!
NINJA12471 1 year ago
I saw a B-52 do that to a fully loaded Chevy Step-Van. Rolled the damn thing 1/4 mile down the flightline. The weight don't make a bit of difference. The point is "Don't Do It!!!"
mrfarmerjimbob 1 year ago
just sent the poor stunt-man's car away
TrogFishaz 1 year ago
kick ass! LOL thats 68000+ ft lbs of thrust power for ya
borntorazehell777 1 year ago
Omfg the truck gots cheats!
danni537 1 year ago
I watched a catering truck drive behind a Leftansa 747 at dfw back in the 90's and it took that truck airborne with taxi thrust only! The truck rolled several times then they had to cut the dazed driver free. He was ok.
413Glass 1 year ago
Damn that truck got fucked up!
StevieG454 1 year ago
would love to stand behind one... if i maneged to stay up and not being airborne would the wind of the thrust rip my flash of my bones ?? if thats the case nvm than i dont wanna be behind one
ChibiChan1988 1 year ago
Si, todo muy lindo pero la camioneta no tenia el motor, y estaba sin los cristales...
ga0by0to 1 year ago
it looks like the truckr tried to fly
themonkeyman96 1 year ago
Mythbusters proved that it's true, with a real bus... not a car that can't drive...
TheAwesomeBart 1 year ago 2
a stronziiiii
galagafasu 1 year ago
Damn I got It OK?!?!
2210freestyle1994 2 years ago
Ja heult doch ihr Kackboons xD
2210freestyle1994 2 years ago
"Many don't think it can hurt them."
Who?!?
Who has ever said that? LOL
1DanielChristensen 2 years ago
I think they just mean that people expect the thrust to have weakened across the distance of between the engine and vehicle.
xero993 2 years ago
You all say this is funny.
But I think that no one of you Knows what happened to the Driver of the car.
Seeing People dying is not funny
2210freestyle1994 2 years ago
so, not only can you not understand that the narrator said this was i staged demonstration, but you also clearly, cannot see that the truck was empty, and was being towed by a firetruck. Really, did you even watch the video?
KARMA180 2 years ago 3
@2210freestyle1994
Uhhh dude, this was all staged and no one was in the truck >_>
pokerguy17 2 years ago
Hey dumbass, can you not see the huge letters that say staged demonstration
acskateNiblets 2 years ago
Its people like you that should replicate. Please sterilize yourself and save the humanity from another batch of idiots and morons like you.
chaman3872 2 years ago
lol u talk about ppl being so stupid but u messed up your own 1st line.... maybe u should take your advice hahahah
weewoodeal 1 year ago
And??? Are your father and mother related? Go fuck yourself.
chaman3872 1 year ago
Yeah...okay you asian fuck. Maybe you should stop trying to be american...with your english wannabe slang and shit. Go smoke more opium and go fuck Buddha.
chaman3872 1 year ago
lol its ppl like you that should replicate 55+ 婊子
weewoodeal 1 year ago
@2210freestyle1994 there was no F*kn driver it was like somehow pushed
husky2017 2 years ago
Yea, the engine didn't matter I don't think, but why not leave the engine in there for a more accurate demo. But then again, thats why we are becoming a second rate country. We do things half-assed
caneywaney 2 years ago
That´s so Incredible!
FSXSuperboy 2 years ago
It would do the same thing with or without the engine inside, but it not being there still shows the audience a not so good demo.
Again, it would still blow it away, but they didn't need to take the engine out.
cheekytheangel 2 years ago
Well there are not many scenarios I can think of where ground service vehicles would be driving behind jet engines at that sort of thrust. Around terminals and taxiing, jets are usually just at taxi idle or breakaway thrust which 4/5 of fuck all compared to the demo.
Karl0010 2 years ago
it not havy inaff
neatbike 2 years ago
Weight has less to do with it than surface area. A bus exposed to this type of wind velocity would be blown further than a small care.
Z1Z2Z5Z4 2 years ago
Well overall they're even.
It's not one or the other it's the ratio of weight to surface area.
xero993 2 years ago
pfft... @ 1:15, you can clearly see the truck doesnt even have an engine, not that it would make that much difference, but still... cheap demo... may as well use a kite
BadB0Ydaddy 2 years ago 16
Like they said, if it will lift a 870,000 lb. airplane, a 4000 lb pickup is nothing! The engine in the truck is only about 700 lbs.
buster757 2 years ago 3
lol
kyriswat911 2 years ago
@BadB0Ydaddy Dont think the engine would do any difference, just think they took out the engine so there will be no oilspill in the ocean.
walkman1975 1 year ago
@BadB0Ydaddy so true man
batmanmobile 1 year ago
@BadB0Ydaddy its just a couple more weight on it It doesnt really matter
and they dont want any explosions in the water
magamka 1 year ago
@magamka since whens did anyone in US stop enjoy blowing shit up...
bottom line is, its a half ass'd test and i did say that it wouldnt make any difference if it did have an engine... doesnt mean it also had to have full tank of fuel... but it wouldve been a tad more exciting if it did :)
BadB0Ydaddy 1 year ago
@BadB0Ydaddy Maybe that's why it says 'Staged Demonstration' twit!
algolake 7 months ago
@algolake The clip saying saying 'staged demonstration' would be more so drama queens like yourself dont think someones actually in the truck , smashed around and about to drown etc... my point was basically that the truck is way lighter than its meant to be, thus being thrown around more dramatically. What appears to be a truck is only a rolling shell Vs a jet engine. Get it?
BadB0Ydaddy 7 months ago
WOW!
The truck was blowed away just like a soft drink can.
applesweeter 2 years ago
i watched this video at work.
EagleTalons1 2 years ago
good for you
tomar5e101 2 years ago
prick much?
EagleTalons1 2 years ago
After studying the CSI data, and observing and noting the affected perimeter, we can conclude categorically that:
American Airlines Flight 77 DID NOT strike the Pentagon on Sept. 11, 2001.
Thank you so much for this post! It is scientific proof that what happened the morning of 9/11 was not due to a Commercial Airliner striking the Pentagon at low level altitude traveling at approx. 500+ mph, but rather something of a DIFFERENT nature -- like a missle strike!
JDAytche1 2 years ago
dude what the fuck?smoked something you shouldnt have smoked?
Torgeirja 2 years ago 2
and my money was on the truck...
naemf343 2 years ago 2
too bad i have a tablet pc whos screen can turn/ flip :)
NaterGaterTheSkater7 2 years ago
they should try it with a tank lol
Supduplemup 2 years ago 2
Wow! That's much more Powerful then Cyclone Larry
chapman1235 2 years ago
i saw this somewhere else. they also did a school bus with pretty much the same result
HeadshotHarry 2 years ago
Is that ment to be a training video
retrotest 2 years ago
they took the motor out of the truck
not an accurate demonstration...get your shit outta here bitch!
TamiyaRunner 3 years ago
other videos have the engines in them, still the same result
LizzyAston 3 years ago
lol this was made the year i was born 1993
noobschoolbus37 3 years ago
Sweet Dude!
avsfan1121 2 years ago
That was great!
HammeredDeath 3 years ago
a truck??
a f*cking pick up!
getclose98 3 years ago
even if the truck had a motor in it you would still get pwnd and die if you were drivin
tank2g2 3 years ago
why cant i see the video
just moved new area QI
Henryandrex 3 years ago
Texas Tech University in Lubbock, Texas has got to get themselves a nice jet engine. If just two jet engines can push 50+ tons of steel through the sky at nearly 500 miles per hour, even one jet engine would have absolutely no problem simulating the winds in a violent tornado, such as the one that hit Oklahoma City on May 3, 1999.
triton115 3 years ago
Yeah your right it had no motor in it, you can see. but i still think with the motor it would be blown away it just wouldn't travel as far.
Veritaslol 3 years ago
its a fake truck, made out of plastic and construction paper. hehe. I will punch that engine in the dick.
sneakytouchyourplace 3 years ago
nice.
butplugbrothers 3 years ago 4
Comment removed
dumberchild180 2 years ago
haha, now u'd gotten 3 down :))
nazirdjon 2 years ago
That truck still weighs alot.
emutiny 3 years ago
lmao thats what you call OWNED
PartyChumba 3 years ago
wow omg
miniclipplay 3 years ago
....And there it goes....
Hype679 3 years ago
wow truck got OWNED!!
cuda163 3 years ago
don't mess with the jet
STLPILOT9 3 years ago
WOW!
HomoOptimus 3 years ago
lmao PWND!!!!
jokinjoe5 3 years ago
the truck was very light though...the engine,the gear box and the shaft was removed in order to make it lighter...lol
giannnisian 3 years ago 3
Wonder what all that thrust translates to in mph? It would make one hell of a leaf blower!
richinfort 3 years ago
the only time in the trucks life where it travelled over 40mph! lol
speedbird125 3 years ago
this cheap truck...
sdrfgvrfgvsfravgdsvS 3 years ago
lol theres no engine in that car, it lost a lot of weight from that, thats the only reason it blew so far
edgexninja 3 years ago
haha.. ill wanna walk pass that..
kuhn921 3 years ago
LOOOOOOL hate to be that hillbilly in that car so bad
Tylerunderfire 3 years ago
Sucks to be the hillbilly inside
jkerrigan1990 3 years ago 3
Now I know what happened to my '70 pickup. (Before I bought it...)
sparkyashred 3 years ago
if i was in that truck, id b like......fuck
PnkFloydFan420 3 years ago
jet engine:1 truck:0 lol
iamzemasta 3 years ago
I did that on a quad bike when I was working at Birmingham airport------errr ,,,just to see what would happen??? !! "BEWARE-JET BLAST".
Rob187ok 3 years ago
I believe this would happen. But I would like to point out this is just frame and body, there was no motor inside that truck. But, I realize the same effect would happen. Powerful.
KeysToMyGuitar 3 years ago
owned
ADTpwnz 3 years ago
damn good for long distance jumping lol
Skyline750 3 years ago
wow what an idiot, who would driver their truck right behind that plane... dumbass deserves what he gets.
aolyahoo 3 years ago
Jet engine = power level over 9000
Mushu909 3 years ago 3
pwned
nukethewhales1986 3 years ago
truck got owned XD
aeb324 3 years ago
to those who don't believe me about the guy being sucked through its alright
here is the video for what i did see though
(insert youtube site) /watch?v=L_gpPbpONK4
Just saying
atari26003 3 years ago
GODDAMN!
fatleader 3 years ago
drunk driving is bad
ORIZZAY 3 years ago
That sometimes happens when I fart, too.
woalbe 3 years ago 16
HAHAHAHAHAHA LMAO
Nocturnal0mmision 3 years ago
haha do the front part
austinhinton 3 years ago
that truck..had no engine. making it much lighter. but still.lol
DallassCowboyss 3 years ago
I'd hate to see what would happen to my car...i've got a Toyota MR2
RedundantAssassin 3 years ago
some person on some vid i seen was sucked into it and came out other end okay, i say one in a bazillion chance of that though.
atari26003 3 years ago
Very funny :p
Jet engines use fans with lots of very small blades (look at the start of the vid). Unless that guy was about 1 cm thick he would have trouble fitting trough.
Jet engines are also designed to cut meat and bones without taking damage so it isn't destroyed when the plane eats up a bird during flight (which will be cut into finger wide slices)
Cygon4 3 years ago 2
yes the vid you refer to is a fake - there is no way you would come out the end as anything more than spray of human bits.
GibsonElectric 3 years ago
Maybe hes referring to the accident on the USS Theodore Roosevelt. A guy was sucked in and did live but he didnt come out the other side. He didnt even touch the blades which is of course the only way anyone could survive something like that.
brainburrito 3 years ago
Yes we all believe you
jimoffy 3 years ago
yeah these things can tear people to shreds the the engine will become damaged it brings new meaning to the term "whats for lunch?"
andyroo22 3 years ago
i was in that truck
ownedu101 3 years ago
so THAT'S how they make artificial reefs!
danbowkley 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
spikealike247 3 years ago
AightxD. So Cool (H)
Wessieeeeee 3 years ago
think about the aircraft weighs more than 10x then the truck, even with a engine and transmission wouldnt help
combatcol18 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
that car didn t had a motor get the fuck outta here with this phony demonstration
Gr8Success 3 years ago
PWNED!!!!!!!!!!!!
legolover79 3 years ago
man thats some serious power, if the Nazis were around today they would use that against Crowd control/Riots or something!
ozmanbro 3 years ago
WTF noob lol! that truck was witouth any kind of motor
Juliito7 3 years ago
no motor or transmission equals very very light truck
Konakola 3 years ago 2
LOL!
ronaldinho2211 3 years ago
wow it shot that car all the way back to Japan, where it came from
lawl!!!!
BS602kxSkater 3 years ago
the pw4062 on the 747-400 is 63,300lb of thrust and the gecf6-80c2b5f has 62,100lb of thrust so omid check your books because this is what it says in the boeing website because this is the thrust for the 747-400
continental7378 3 years ago
Boeing's website lists the best engine option. Not all companies buy their jets with top-of-the-line options. United Airlines 747-400s use PW4056, which produce 56,700 lbs. of thrust. Most 747-400s use PW4056 or CF6-80C2B1F.
worldlinerai 3 years ago
yeah i make up words too lol
michaelharper110 3 years ago
well, mythbuster also show that jet engine can flip taxi, bus with engine and a small plane
josephtan1818 4 years ago
So? The first time they failed calling the myth busted. But several safety videos such as this proves them wrong. Sometimes they are just ignorant...
Skarre2 3 years ago
if truck has a a engine or not it will still get blown away because this a 767-200 of united that each eangine produces 62,100 pounds of thrust so 62,100+62,100= 124,200 pounds of thurst in total
continental7378 4 years ago
your dead wrong. The 747-400's engine make only 58000 pounds of trust, so how could the 767 make more than a 747 lol. just look at the size difference.
Omid45 3 years ago
The 767-200 uses a more powerful engine (General Electric CF6-80C2) because it relies on only TWO engines for its heavy, extended range operations. The 747 divides its power demand among four engines, so each one doesn't need to make as much thrust.
Dan4Dresden 3 years ago
that makes sense! but i thought that was the case with the 777's not the 767?
Omid45 3 years ago
The 777 does it in spades, using the GE90-115B1 engine, with thrust ranging from 74,000 to 115,000 lb. The 767 is still the transcontinental/transatlantic workhorse of many airlines, like Continental (which doesn't operate ANY 747s). When comparing the 747/767, remember, it's not the size of the airplane that matters, it's the size of the engine. Also, too, the 767's engines are a newer design than the standard CF6s on most 747s.
Dan4Dresden 3 years ago
It got blown away because there was no engine in the truck. The engine is what gives the truck its weight
Username354244 4 years ago
Thats true, but after what happened to that truck do you think the engine is going to make much difference?
kinsley2108 4 years ago
Fuck even if you had tons of lead weights in the bad of the truck and Rosie o Donell driving it would still flip the truck. Might not blow it as far away though.
AK47bandit 4 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
i was sucked by the air intake of the jet.
finchiestiffler79 4 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Any reason Steven Hawking is narrating?
greatbritainwba 4 years ago
no one that stupid would get blown by a jet
power4487 4 years ago
So why did they redo this on Mythbusters?
supertaj 4 years ago
right ! i did see that episode, and i thought it was (busted) it blew the plastic off the car,... but they did not use a real jet !! just the engine. i don't know ? you got me .
PIANOMAN720 4 years ago
The reason the myth was busted on mythbusters is because they couldn't use full size engines that put out REAL power. the little engines they used were made to simulate wind for special effects not true thrust.
Soldier0117 4 years ago
thats bro. for clearing that up !! on to the next myth.
PIANOMAN720 4 years ago
beats me?
erikd217 4 years ago
hehe ale poleciał
Gulczas08 4 years ago
they took the motor out this vid is flowd
november249 4 years ago
HAHAha Wtf ,...THey put all that crap in the water.. is that serious... we dont talk about how water is dirty.. but that make a good show
sisterr 4 years ago
so much for the blockade before the water... =\
antman910 4 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
gay vid
koester41 4 years ago
casino royale has it spot on ;)
rwm650 4 years ago 6
no matter how many things they leave in the truck or bus or take it those General Electric cf-6-80c12df will blow the bus and truck away because it has a thrust of 62,100 pounds of thrust more than the Airbus A300 jetliner the Boeing 767 carries different types of engines General Electric Rolls Royce and Pratt and Whitney GE IS THE HIGLY USED ENGINE IN THE 767
continental7378 4 years ago
Dude ur retarded it can flip over a truck or bus for that matter.
XxWrenchxX 4 years ago
The truck had no engine. That's approx 20% of the vehicles weight. Probably no fuel tank, and who knows what else they stripped out. I'd like to see a real world situation, not a phony dramatization.
cashdudehomie 4 years ago
Ya man I mean you can feel those on HWYs near airports when they land. Atlanta, DFW, MSP.
[Note I say feel because there not at max thrust. The myth is a 747 at full trust blew an impatcent taxi driver who ran a red.
IcyAlaska 4 years ago
once again like i always mention in this forum this is a 767-300ER commercial airliner and it has a thrust of 62,100 pounds of thrust that's powerful enough to cause damage to a house or a fence and yes it will blow away a tank imagine that it has 2 747 engines
continental7378 4 years ago
holy lesbian that was sick
LineRida4Eva 4 years ago
holy crap!
torigolddust 4 years ago
Good lord....those jet engines are POWERFUL!!! Now lets just see it blow away a tank! XD
Blake687 4 years ago
That truck had no engine in it
beebs07 4 years ago 2
I doubt that rusak24. An F-14 is much lighter than a 747, and therefore, needs less thrust to gain speed.
Phonynameman 4 years ago
Das cool, do airliner engines produce more thrust than military fighters?
rusak24 4 years ago
Modern ones do, but they are big high-bypass turbofans (a lot of the air they take in just slips right through the cowling-note that in some shots you can see daylight through them-and the engine basically sucks the plane through the air) that physically wouldn't fit in a sleek fighter-size airframe. Fighter turbofan engines have a much lower bypass and get most of their power from their afterburners-much more responsive than the big airliner engines, but it just guzzles fuel when they are lit!
AceWalkerAstronaut 4 years ago
That comment was for rusak24 btw-still getting the hang of posting on youtube dang it....
AceWalkerAstronaut 4 years ago
Well i mean a 747 engine what do they use pratt and whittney or something like that compared to a after burning engine like say that on a Mig-31 or F-15 or better yet a SR-71
rusak24 4 years ago
pwned
90Turbo7m 4 years ago
well garrapata 8008 that is not going to happen it will be a catastrophe and the city and state and airline and the manufacturer will get in trouble and they will be in court for a long time
continental7378 4 years ago
if you park a 767 jet in front of a walmart store it will blow everything inside it and leave it destroyed pretty much like a hurricane
continental7378 4 years ago
cool ...we should try that
garrapata8008 4 years ago
wonder i it could blow away a wal-mart store =)
siziam 4 years ago
i love to see what it would do to a geo metro. actually i like to see some "retired" engines at work you know where you don't have to care about saving the engine and strike it up and try to get an object through it watching the engine and the object blast into pieces.
springloadedchicken 4 years ago
for brmk listen dude grow up okay is only a video okay nothing of what you saying about social skills make sense because what people should read about is jet engines in this video so stop defending so much bbmd okay he can speak for himself and all i said was a challenege question and stated that facts abot the engines so you sir brmwk you need to stop having issues cause that make you look like a little kid okay thank you
continental7378 4 years ago
i like the 70's music
Morphesolaz 4 years ago
It would have help if the lorry had the engine left in.
locouk 4 years ago
once again to mention to the people that don't understand this stage demonstration or think that it can't happen for real anything that gets in the way of the engine exhaust of the turbofan engine no matter what version you name it from rb-211's to ge90-115b it will blow a fire truck away sorry to disappoint you bbbd okay any by the way i do read up on jet engines since you think you are so smart mr know it all bbbd how much power does a GE90-92 TURBOFAN ENGINE PRODUCE?
continental7378 4 years ago
Read up on social skills; as they, more than book smarts, will enable you to not only survive the 'real world', but also get along with people; a quality you seem to be lacking.
brmwk 4 years ago
People who put others down for simple comments are actually the dumbass, k, thx, bye.
Everyone is entitled to say what they want, as long as it hurts no one, why give others crap about it? You, sir, need to grow up.
brmwk 4 years ago