unequivocally no question that wtc 1 2 & 7 were destroyed with explosives from within. The evidence is overwhelming to say the least.
Alex Jones is NOT representative of 911 truth. Maybe disinformation. but there is nothing theoretical about WTC7's implosion, 100 day fires, molten metal, the explosive destruction of wtc 1&2 which pulverized tons of concrete, blasted apart the core structures and left no trace found of 1100 people. Regular fires and gravity cannot explain that; explosives can
He is the CHief Rabbi of Torah of Israel. Pretty big chief.
You should go and watch the videos at the website HolocaustDenialVideos and see for yourself. Once you realise how big the lies they have told about the holocaust you will see what a pack of liars the jews are.
There are plenty of "chief rabbis" because Talmudism is about priest worship. Jesus fought these soulless creature as will humanity when the zionist tide is broken on the rocks.
@dankrug As an entire people, essentially, yes. Its a sad fact MOST Jews are brought up believing they are chosen by God & that all others - we Goyim - are less than Human.
PS this video maker is a real turd. He trys to rubbish every single idea mentioned on the internet (wether insane or true; are reptillian theories the sum of of the internet?), that we can only believe in the truth of Western mass media. He makes out that scientific study/simple questioning/common sense are somehow bad!
Wake up and stop supporting the Jew/Edomite/Canaanite aliens. Benjamin Franklin even said that if we allowed the Jew into America in two hundred years they would take over America. Guess what? They have! Wake up! White is right. Now i don't support killing non-whites, just deport them and repatriate them to their home land.
@GravDiga the engine and black box and other materials were found. reading a webiste is not academic or scientific research. you saw what on cnn? a snippet of a video? were you at the site or are you just taking the word of fools making money on conspiracies? is that how sicence works in your world? hearsay? you ignore the pics that show actual plane materials?
@battim there were no plane materials in the ''vaporized'' wreck.. remember?
it has nothing to do with science.. its a simple case of seeing what is there.. on TV
with helicopters flying over the area... Oh look no plane just a big scorch mark....seriously how dumb do you think people are... how are you going to disprove that? Many researchers have seen all sides of the wreck.. and that was nothing like the other 100% of plane wrecks i've seen on land
@GravDiga not true. it did not vaporize there was metal and plane parts all over the place. many researchers? lol. the vast majority of researchers do not agree with 911 truthers. you ignore them and simply agree with the tiny minority that agree with you. thats not science.
@battim not saying there wasn't any evidence found.... most of the plane in united 93 was vaporized.... now how exactly is that scientifically possible i would like to know..
and the pentagon attack ....well lets not talk about that :P
@GravDiga the pentagon attack there is not one eyewitness of the tens of thousands that refutes it was a plane. not one. as for it being possible, at suprsonic speed it was not vaporized. there was plenty of pieces of a planes and pictures that show that. the pentagon, on cnn, you clearly see plane parts all over the lawn. the engine, as we know, was found inside the building.
@battim That's why i'm not debating it... the footage is amazingly shitty don't cha think? i guess that could be blamed on the speed of the plane. 2 frames showing the plane on most videos..
@GravDiga he never claimed evidence. simply intelligence. the very intelligence supplied to us from russia, european nations and even iran. inteeligence is often incorrect, its guesswork. that said we do know he used them on the kurds. we know we had at one time because not only did he admit his brother in law was making them without his knowledge (a stretch) but american companies sold him the tech. invasion was unneccessary. triagulation proves nothing.
you can intelligently question the government, as i do frequently on my channel, without resorting to silly conspiracy theories and tin foil caps. paranoia is treatable, think about it.
I also think you are saying, "you are all crazy to believe in anything" - well, excuse me for saying this, some of us do actually research stuff. All you do is saying, "I don't believe you" without researching the same material. Some of these conspiracy theories have loads of historical backing.
Oh well, easy to sit back on your lazy side and say, "well, I never heard that story before, so it must be crazy" ...
i am not saying you are crazy. i am simply stating that there are two sides to every perspective. i can certainly say that if israel were this all powerful being, there'd be no palestinian issue. that a fact.
Alex Jones is away with the fairies ;-) One must wonder at times if Alex Jones has been mind altred to discredit the truth movement. I agrea with the core of you statement here, but call me a whack job if I don't people who profit from others, whether it be Mr Jones or Mr Cheney
Ok lets sit back a second here, now yes there is a lot of parnoid rubbish going around, but the belief that the governing power is there to sevre only good for the people is the Niavity that you should only find in 1970's porno films. Look you are a man who has a lot of critism of things and has reason some what on conplex matters, do you not think that decision which many would consider evil are not carried out for some concept of greater good in a few minds and then not comunicated to all?
i never claimed that the government wasn't self interested. it does plenty of things overtly to come to that logical conclusion. using something as an excuse to profit is not the same as causing said thing to actually happen.
because he is insignificant. really. why waste media time with a creationist who wants to put prayer in school who thinks global warming is a hoax. he's like a scary little lyndon larouche from the right.
I'm so glad that those emails leaked out about the global warming scam, because that's the beginning of the end for that shameful Gore humanoid and his eco-nazis and especially the int'l centralists who finally found an opportunity to build a strong foundation for their world gov't by gathering the world together behind the perfect cause, taking advantage of peope's sensitivity to the environment by mongering fear. Now we now that the world has been cooling and the polar bear is on the rise. :)
I don't subscribe to the terms left vs. right extremism if they mean socialism vs. fascism. That's based on a faulty, archaic political spectrum invented by the Europeans, who have known nothing else but authoritarian society, whether it be kings, socialism, fascism and perhaps in the future Islamic shari'a. If both nazism and communism is absolute power (large gov't) and on opposite sides of the spectrum, are you saying that those who want small gov't like me are in the middle of that spectrum?
In my view, fascism, socialism, islamism, any ideology where the individual is powerless and bullied by the majority is all far left and the farthest right is anarchy and 0% gov't. I must then be far right, as I believe in a micro gov't, a slight step away from anarchy and lawlessness, where the gov't has no more business than just protecting our individual rights and national security. Anything the gov't does beyond that is big brother, socialist, fascist, whatever you wanna call it.
I actually believe there is a new world order in the making, but unfortunately it's not what those NWO nutjobs you mentioned think. I say unfortunately, because the reality is a lot worse than some imaginary secret society or elite ruling class running the show. Over the last years, I have studied the UN very closely and have seen how they gradually are trying to steal sovereignty from member nations and try to centralize power and create a world gov't.
The problem is also that many like the idea of a world gov't, one currency, etc. They see it as a form of unity that will lead to peace and prosperity. They don't see the danger with putting all eggs in one basket. I mean can you imagine if this world gov't run by bureaucrats would fail economically and go bankrupt like Iceland did? Or that this gov't would bully those with opposing views and end public debate? I mean haven't we learned that power corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely?
i'm not really all that certain. the right to left spectrum has gotten a little confusing lately. personally, i consider myself ambidextrous for that reason.
naziism ig germany was fascist, not socialist. nazism is a right wing idea. look it up. simply having socialism in their name means little, private industry thrived under hitler. they were no more socialist than the people republic of china was a republic.
I beg to differ. The existence of a private industry alone does not constitute Capitalism. What existed under Hitler's regime was Corporatism, which is a progressive ideology. Capitalism can't thrive in a society where the gov't interferes with the free market and our individual rights, where there's absolute power and political opponents are silenced and killed.
In order for socialism to succeed, there must be as much gov't interference as possible. Free speech eventually kills socialism.
nazism incorporated both right and left wing ideals into their form of governance. the idea of perfect races and social darwinism are certainly right wing. nationalized medicine certainly left wing. nazism rejects plurality. that is certainly right wing.
Again, these left/right labels don't mean much if we're not on the same page about the definition. But for sake of argument, I consider myself right-wing and have conservative/libertarian views, meaning I want a small gov't, i.e. a micro gov't, i.e. a gov't that only protects our rights from being violated, i.e. a REAL capitalist, constitutional republic. Are you then implying that if I go farther to the right, I will at some point want a totalitarian/large/fascist/authoritarian/whatever gov't?
Capitalism is color blind. One race or one collective mind or anything uniformed or homogeneous society is leftist, thus Nazism has been falsely attributed to right-wing. Social Darwinism is not about race but survival of the fittest, also not applicable to Capitalism.
For those in the very bottom of society, who did or wanted less for whatever reason, are not forgotten, so it's not about survival of the fittest. If one needs a hand-out, private charity is superior to welfare. The Jews in biblical times invented the first organized private charity and were encouraged to give half a shekel of silver to the poor annually, but it wasn't forced through taxes.
The poor were well taken care of and felt directly the generosity of his fellow man and that somebody cared, rather than feeling it was his human right to receive money from the state, which is cold and artificial. The giver also felt better about himself, because giving is a joy, while paying taxes is a heavy burden.
Citizens of a free society, grow up more responsible and don't need a big brother to be generous on their behalf. Look at all the homeless in California, a blue state, how badly they are taken care of. Because everybody is expecting the gov't to do something and not enough people feel responsibility for their fellow man, because they were not brought up that way.
You are right about National Socialism being a misnomer, but it's not the "socialist" part but rather the "national" part. The Nazi empire was clearly globalist, spreading to other nations, and not nationalist. Nationalism is the opposite of internationalism or globalism. There is no mention of anything global this-or-that in the constitution. If you believe in the U.S. constitution and think it reigns supreme over any int'l governing body, such as the UN, you are a nationalist, not a racist.
For the same reason we call homicide bombings "suicide bombings." Old habit. Socialist, liberals, progressives are all on the page as a collective. It's just labels. To tell them apart is splitting hairs.
3 buildings all collapsing in the same way???? please.... these were all controlled demolitions....TOO MUCH of a coincidence....you dont have to be a clever individual to see what really happened here!!
No but you are a moron if you think they collapsed the same way. One collapse from the top down...the other from the middle. Name one...just one...department of physics in the world that agrees with you. One academic source.
i'm not a moron pal, infact i am quite the opposite...i just think there is a lot more to this than meets the eye...you have your opinion and i have mine....if i find that i have doubt about this topic anytime in the near future, i will gladly reply to you with an apology..cant say fairer than that can i?
And you remind me of paranoid delusional folks that have jackets whose arms tie in the back. Ballon boy dad. Like you and alex jones, are the delusional ones.
excuse me sir i just have one queston i cant say im a alex jones follower cause to me his totally too bias but.....the twin towers falling at free fall speed is impossible now i dont know the full truth but its very obvious that SOMETHING at least something is weird about all of that and the fact that building 7 fell when NO planes hit it and had minor fires in it too fell at free fall speed so maybe the towers could had fell but dude BUILDING 7 no planes hit it explain THAT please
but for real battim you seem like a dude with lots of common sense but building seven has been ignored by everybody including the media i just want your take on it it would seem that that building is a huge clue in this whole 911 twin tower fiasco im just saying do you believethere isnt a hint not even a hint of bullshit played on the day of 9 11 by somebody not even our goverment but somebody shit including alex jones LOL
building seven was affected by affects that are worse that a plane hitting it. the towers collapse causes tremors that rival small earthquakes. buidling seven was within ground zero of impact of two huge buildings hitting the ground. it literally detroyed its foundation. not to mention a half of day of burning inferno and debris that tooks at tens of thousands of square feet of its outer bearing wall. i'm surprised it stayed up as long as it did, frankly.
okay thats agood point but on the tv it also fell at free fallspeed into its on ground no tilt effect no nothing same effect ass a demolition that ive seen on discovery channel 1000 times see my point is that with 3 different failures and all have different damaging events done to them so how can wih in a 30 to 45 minute period and actually its alot less all fall very similar this is actually impossible unless they are all hit at or affected in the same area and built the same food for thought
when they say free fall speed they mean the time the roof took to get to point a to point b not the building the ROOF and yes it actually fail at free fall speed the same time it would had took a bowling ball to hit the ground if dropped from the roof tht you cant deny
Well I can deny it was a controlled demo because there is no evidence of that. No skyscraper will react the same as another designed differently. According to engineers the world over. As oppsed to those who profit from conspriacies, the buidling reacted as it should have given the conditions.
but see even more i think you refuse to believe the evidence of something else could have occured when there are evidences that are obvious to anyone with common logic i dont know your stand but it seems you deny alot which makes you and alex jones similar to me just too biased on the subject speading your own agendas i dont know what happens there good evidence on both sides but obviously the truth is being blured from allsides making even you a conspiracy theorist ......
There is no physical evidence it was a comtrolled demo. There is physical evidence of structural deficiency. You side with speculation, I side with evidence and scientific consensus.
When we're talking about Conspiracy theorists being nuts, are we talking about any Conspiracy? ...I mean, obviously not - there have been provable conspiracies in the past that have necessitated a word for the concept. Sometimes it just seems to me, like just as a lot of 'Conspiracy Theorists' are thought of, often correctly, as reactionary, it's a much more common form of reactionism to label the very concept of 'Conspiracy' as being a little hokey. What do you guys think?
if you havent been to africa then fuck off cracker u stupid white people you guys anit shit all of yall need to burn and rot in hell
Asians blacks and any one of color/people of color are the best people in the world and then there is you guys the plauin white skined people the only people in the world with white skin so you guys are the different ones you
So, why do we have 30,000+ troops in Afghanistan? Why are our carrier groups conducting sorties around the world, and specifically in the Persian Gulf and Indian Ocean?
yes. americans needed an excuse to attack the middle east. so they set up a "terrorist attack" to use as an excuse. you dont understand your own system and what it is centered around
Complete nonsense. The World Trade Center was the financial center for New York and much of the east coast of the United States. Why on EARTH destroy it? To attack the middle east? What for?
We crushed Saddam Hussein's military within a month. Had we wanted to, we would have attacked him earlier, AND WE DID. Same with Afghanistan.
Wars cost MONEY. That's why we're strapped for cash. Get real.
why wage war???? wars are the most profitable thing there is. Saddam was an american agent, americans need people like him. you are so uninformed it drives me crazy. you dont know your own history. the reason america wages war is to keep the weapons industry going.
watch the movie Zeitgeist Addendum. Just google it, its a free movie to inform people about the world they live in and the shit america is doing. I recommend it to you man. dont buy the shit the capitalists are selling to you bro...
Why not just conduct business as usual? You're missing a very large point, and that is wars cost money, and military personnel do not profit from warfare. The arms industry may, but they realize that their sales and profits are not only dependent on the Pentagon's budget, but also how much the Fed can afford to spend.
Right now we can't afford it. We're borrowing from Germany, China and Japan to fund these operations. If the US is so corrupt, then why don't you move to Mexico?
The other larger point being that it makes no sense to bankrupt a nation. It's part of the reason cheap weapons are available, and not just high tech smart munitions.
The arms industry exists because it's needed, just like the whole reason we have a military. There are nations and other powers that want our resources, and vice versa. Destruction of those parties for profit is unprofitable, hence your argument is insane.
i've WRITTEN articles on this subject, trust me. not all wars are fought over resources. the military is unneeded, its just that you have been brainwashed from your day 1 into believing the military "protects" you. the USA is not protecting its resources by waging war in the middle east, it is ROBBING OTHER PEOPLE's resources. Do you honestly believe that the usa is "desperately" protecting its resources by fighting in the Rack and the ghan?
What "articles" have you written? Have they been published in reputable journals, or is it just you spouting off on some web log?
Do you write for Time, The Economist, Janes Defense Weekly, National Review?
I'm really curious what "articles" you've written, and what more you have to say. I'm curious, and I think other people reading this exchange are also curious too.
When people like him post, even though most people laugh him off or ignore his type, it still gets to me because there're people gullible and honest enough to believe his nonsense. Time for me to move on :)
hitler was a jew agent. i used to respect him at least a little bit but when i found out how he supported rich jews and how 1/2 of his government was jewish it all became clear - hitler is a joke
no thats not how i am. i am 100% against racial discrimination... but.... i just think minorities and especially the jewish one are in the way of a unified social world. that DOESNT mean that we must terrorize them. what we must do is we must integrate them, make them normal citizens. and btw do you know that minorities like gypsies and jews have more rights than the citizens of the respective country?
was karl marx racist? the greatest economist and politician of all time. he foretold the path of society more than 100 years ago. he was partially jewish and STILL he didnt like the jews. he didnt want to kill them, he just knew what the economical facts said, on paper, nothing personal. and they spoke against the jewish minorities...
marx was not a politician. he was a labor organizer, and not a very good one. marx never wrote anything antisemitic. we tried marx, he was not evil, but he was wrong.
its called "on the jewish question" and depending on what agenda you're pushing it can be interpreted as anti-semitic or not. Truth is subjective kiddo. What every single idiot out there believes about 9/11 is truth to them. To conflate illuminati and anti-semtic shit with attempts to dig up facts on 9/11 is ignorant. If you think the 9/11 commission gave all the answers then you obviously haven't spoken with any of the family members of people that died that day.
Can you give me one academic source that agrees with any of the 911 truth movements? One academioc source. There is objective truths, there are also paranoid conspiracists that say thngs like "truth is subjective kiddo". At 41 I appreciate being called kiddo. What I don't appreciate is rationalizing murderous assholes with nazi ties that are motivated by paranoid theories.
you fell victim to what is known as "shielding", investigating historical events does not get marketed so there is no maestro behind it dude. There is no like supreme 9/11 truth guy who i guess you think has "nazi ties". There are just a large amount of people who want more information about what happened that day. Certain individuals have conclusions, you wouldn't need to agree with their conclusions.
And truth is certainly subjective, I did not realize I was talking to a positivist.
Which part of the 9/11 truth movement are you talking about?
Even for shit as farfetched as controlled demolition there are multiple articles published in peer reviewed journals.
If you want to know a little about "situated truth" in regards to 9/11 you can start with Zehfuss. Obviously alex jones is a jackass, but don't conflate him with the efforts for information on 9/11 just bc he proclaims himself king.
There are NO truths apart from a human to perceive it.
peer reviewed? peer reviewed and laughed at you mean. sicence works based on consesnus, there are quacks in every area of study. everything exists regardless of how we perceive. that things you speak of are sophistry, not math and science.
positivism and arguments that objective truth exists are the foundational assumptions of fascism and racial supremacism. Without a person to perceive it there is no truth, truth does not exist apart from humans, and all humans are subjects. All humans filter what they say in a constant process of interpretation.
Be wary of people who claim universal truth exists, KILL THEM if they claim to know it.
you are a strange little man. evolution is the way life develops, thats not darwinism, its evolution. and you may be proof natural selection does choose idiots. lol. moron.
Dude those guys that beleive in all that "big brother" crap and the government wants to take them down, The government has bigger fish to fry than some ignorant racist who obviously lacks any sort of intellegence so they resort to violence. It makes no sense as to why the government doesnt do something to them but oh yeah theyre giving them their constitutional right to say what they want to say, or feel how they want to feel. Theyre walking talking oxymorons.
From what your saying; would you support Blackwater ops in your home town to find the "domestic terrorist". HEY we got domestic terrorist!! Okay, lets suspend the Constititution even further get rid of the Bill of Rights, right to free speech, bear arms, no standing arming, no warrants for search/seisures, no more habeus corpus. WHEN WILL YOU FEEL SAFE? when we are a fascist/communistic nation? Slippery slope battim.
when did i say i'd support blackwater doing anything domestically? slippery slope is making a hero out of a nazi. keep defending hate. brilliant. lol.
Are you saying there were no mind control experiments during WW2? I'm not saying that this was the case with this guy. But the CIA was performing mind control experiments. You can't deny that.
Well, sometimes conspiracy theorists are right. What about JFK. Do you think Lee Harvey acted alone? Do you even think he pulled the trigger? I am pretty certain he was set up. I find the Warren Commission to be highly suspicious. Then you have Howard Hunt's confession. Seems pretty damn obvious the CIA was involved in the assassination of JFK. You just seem to be saying there are no conspiracies at all, which seems unlikely.
nothing indicates the bullets came from anywhere, as the film and experimientation shows, but where oswald was. as for Hunt, its been shown time and again he was neither one of the three tramps and that his deathbed accusation was implausible.
Firthermore Hunt never confessed, in fact, reiterated he has nothing to do with it. He only speculated Harvey and LBJ had motive. He never claimed to be part of it.
"So there it was, according to E. Howard Hunt. LBJ had Kennedy killed. It had long been speculated upon. But now E. Howard was saying that's the way it was. And that Lee Harvey Oswald wasn't the only shooter in Dallas. There was also, on the grassy knoll, a French gunman, presumably the Corsican Mafia assassin Lucien Sarti, who has figured prominently in other assassination theories." - Part of the Hunt Confession
Anyone who denies CIA involvement in the JFK assassination is not fit for society.
you are a moron who apprantly likes to copy and paste from anti vaccine websites. (next time try rewording it, you can google plagiarists pretty easy). You are ignoring Hap A and B vaccines, influenza, Repeated infections with influenza virus are common due to rapid antigenic variation of the viral envelope glycoproteins.
Antibodies to the viral neuraminidase and haemagglutinin proteins protect the host from infection. However, because of the rapid antigenic variation, new vaccines, containing antigens derived from influenza strains currently circulating in the community, are produced every year.
A live attenuated strain of varicella zoster virus has been developed. Apparently you are reading 15 year old documentation. In people like you, in your wolr,d losing untold millions of folks unvaccinated justifies losing a handful from vaccine's very low innoculation rates. You ignore that a tiny percent die of vaccines, but millions are saved from the, typical.
Wow! Are you stupid? Rendering a judgment is what results in an opinion. Every interpretted event, all of human experience, requires forming opinions. Grow a brain.
"Every interpretted event, all of human experience, requires forming opinions. " correct, and unless they are done so based on controlled empiricism they have no sound reasoning, did you skip critical thinking in college?
Battim, you are shooting the wrong guy. I was addressing the false either/or of knowledge is either opinion or fact. Opinions differ in quality based upon the strength of their objective reference. Our judgments should always be based on sound reason. Check your aim, buddy.
no doubt, the context i thought was a response to me, not to gutsfuck, who apparently lives by his name. comment sections are pititful on youtube for figuring out who one is pseaking to. i apologize, in that its apparent we agree.
It;s all good. For you it is like a shooting gallery so judging between baddie and civilian can be tricky. My comments tend to be abstract so I get hit alot by my own side.
opinions should always be based on facts, otherwise they are useless, apparently you have no idea what a legal opinion is, something based on precedent and legal facts. lol
I get a kick out of how self-righteously pompous leftists are! If you fucking listen to every side of the story, you wouldn't have to spend all your time bitching about one side from another side. Ron Paul has solid politics that I have yet to see argued successfully.
reallyl ike dreationism should be taugh in schools of praying in school. which ron paul policy do you like? lol. ron paul is a joke. a pysician who denies evolution, a charlatan who wont release the ron paul newsletter because it race baits. ron paul is a joke. i'm not leftist, and ron paul is a moron.
Hello cunt
iconoclast911 2 months ago
unequivocally no question that wtc 1 2 & 7 were destroyed with explosives from within. The evidence is overwhelming to say the least.
Alex Jones is NOT representative of 911 truth. Maybe disinformation. but there is nothing theoretical about WTC7's implosion, 100 day fires, molten metal, the explosive destruction of wtc 1&2 which pulverized tons of concrete, blasted apart the core structures and left no trace found of 1100 people. Regular fires and gravity cannot explain that; explosives can
winston2015 4 months ago
@imhere533
My pleasure bud. I can't stand these infernal zionist pigs and their outrageous hypocrisy.
fuzzybollox 8 months ago
zzzzzzzzzzz....
dirtyboy830 1 year ago
you are the only delutional paranoid you tubber I have seen. Clearly a jew that wants to be white.
stophypocrisy 1 year ago
@stophypocrisy not jewish and don't wanna be. you on the other hand are a racist hick.
battim 1 year ago
@stophypocrisy or rather, he is a shabbes-goy. anyways, a disgrace for humanity. seems crazy to me too.
ZuzerHun 1 year ago
@ZuzerHun the only crazies are antisemitc racists...like you.
battim 10 months ago
@stophypocrisy and what are you? a american KKK member?
hqkill 10 months ago
The only reason why we Goyim exist is to serve Jews and that comes straight from chief rabbet himself.
tarrasque420 1 year ago
@tarrasque420 there is no one "chief rabbi" lol.
battim 1 year ago
@battim
He is the CHief Rabbi of Torah of Israel. Pretty big chief.
You should go and watch the videos at the website HolocaustDenialVideos and see for yourself. Once you realise how big the lies they have told about the holocaust you will see what a pack of liars the jews are.
You obviously enjoy being one of their fools.
KombiPode 1 year ago
@battim
There are plenty of "chief rabbis" because Talmudism is about priest worship. Jesus fought these soulless creature as will humanity when the zionist tide is broken on the rocks.
Wishing you a God damned Israel.
fuzzybollox 9 months ago
@fuzzybollox how does one even respond to this kind of hateful shit
battim 9 months ago
@battim
Just like him, speak what you feel is truth and let people figure it out for themselves.
tannaberton 9 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@battim
You said, "how does one even respond to this kind of hateful shit"
Try getting the Hell out of Palestine.
fuzzybollox 9 months ago
@battim Sure they think of him as a hero, they ardently defend his actions.
MrSkunkwork100 1 month ago
jews are the only white supremists
dankrug 1 year ago
@dankrug what a moron.
battim 1 year ago
@dankrug As an entire people, essentially, yes. Its a sad fact MOST Jews are brought up believing they are chosen by God & that all others - we Goyim - are less than Human.
PS this video maker is a real turd. He trys to rubbish every single idea mentioned on the internet (wether insane or true; are reptillian theories the sum of of the internet?), that we can only believe in the truth of Western mass media. He makes out that scientific study/simple questioning/common sense are somehow bad!
andy7666 1 year ago
Wake up and stop supporting the Jew/Edomite/Canaanite aliens. Benjamin Franklin even said that if we allowed the Jew into America in two hundred years they would take over America. Guess what? They have! Wake up! White is right. Now i don't support killing non-whites, just deport them and repatriate them to their home land.
ReedOfBalm 1 year ago
@ReedOfBalm perhaps you can not quote someone who supported slavery. perhaps also you can reference said quote. you are a bigot.
battim 1 year ago
*yawn* BORING!
dirtyboy830 1 year ago
they're nuts... ah yes.. the claim of every narrow minded individual...
perfect way to finish up the video..
GravDiga 1 year ago
@GravDiga a murdering bigot isn't narrow minded in your world?
battim 1 year ago
@battim Just that line i didn't agree with o.O
and the pentagon missile thing.. seems also it seems United Airlines Flight 93 crash landed but no plane was found there eh.....?
I'm not part of the movement lol but this is a funny picture..and there are more like it.. fuck i saw it on CNN for myself.
just type in pentagon 911 and check out some pics :D
GravDiga 1 year ago
@GravDiga the engine and black box and other materials were found. reading a webiste is not academic or scientific research. you saw what on cnn? a snippet of a video? were you at the site or are you just taking the word of fools making money on conspiracies? is that how sicence works in your world? hearsay? you ignore the pics that show actual plane materials?
battim 1 year ago
@battim there were no plane materials in the ''vaporized'' wreck.. remember?
it has nothing to do with science.. its a simple case of seeing what is there.. on TV
with helicopters flying over the area... Oh look no plane just a big scorch mark....seriously how dumb do you think people are... how are you going to disprove that? Many researchers have seen all sides of the wreck.. and that was nothing like the other 100% of plane wrecks i've seen on land
GravDiga 1 year ago
@GravDiga not true. it did not vaporize there was metal and plane parts all over the place. many researchers? lol. the vast majority of researchers do not agree with 911 truthers. you ignore them and simply agree with the tiny minority that agree with you. thats not science.
battim 1 year ago
@battim not saying there wasn't any evidence found.... most of the plane in united 93 was vaporized.... now how exactly is that scientifically possible i would like to know..
and the pentagon attack ....well lets not talk about that :P
GravDiga 1 year ago
@GravDiga the pentagon attack there is not one eyewitness of the tens of thousands that refutes it was a plane. not one. as for it being possible, at suprsonic speed it was not vaporized. there was plenty of pieces of a planes and pictures that show that. the pentagon, on cnn, you clearly see plane parts all over the lawn. the engine, as we know, was found inside the building.
battim 1 year ago
@battim That's why i'm not debating it... the footage is amazingly shitty don't cha think? i guess that could be blamed on the speed of the plane. 2 frames showing the plane on most videos..
GravDiga 1 year ago
@GravDiga a lack of evidence isn't evidence.
battim 1 year ago
@battim Then why trust the president...when he has a lack of evidence of weapons of mass destructioN!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
GravDiga 1 year ago
@GravDiga he never claimed evidence. simply intelligence. the very intelligence supplied to us from russia, european nations and even iran. inteeligence is often incorrect, its guesswork. that said we do know he used them on the kurds. we know we had at one time because not only did he admit his brother in law was making them without his knowledge (a stretch) but american companies sold him the tech. invasion was unneccessary. triagulation proves nothing.
battim 1 year ago
wooh my names vicky LOL really.........
vjmartinez88 1 year ago
Hehe, your self-righteous manner is filled with arrogance =)
I am not more paranoid than you are blinded by your faith in your government and your doctors ...
Those who will laugh in the end, you know? "They have eyes, but they do not see. They have ears, but they do not hear."
LuxiusDK 1 year ago
you can intelligently question the government, as i do frequently on my channel, without resorting to silly conspiracy theories and tin foil caps. paranoia is treatable, think about it.
battim 1 year ago
@battim
... unfortunately, ignorance is not!
LuxiusDK 1 year ago
ignorance towards what? no believing in silly jew conspiracies? you think this guy some sort of hero for killing folks at a holocaust museum?
battim 1 year ago
@battim
I think all killing is wrong.
I also think you are saying, "you are all crazy to believe in anything" - well, excuse me for saying this, some of us do actually research stuff. All you do is saying, "I don't believe you" without researching the same material. Some of these conspiracy theories have loads of historical backing.
Oh well, easy to sit back on your lazy side and say, "well, I never heard that story before, so it must be crazy" ...
LuxiusDK 1 year ago
i am not saying you are crazy. i am simply stating that there are two sides to every perspective. i can certainly say that if israel were this all powerful being, there'd be no palestinian issue. that a fact.
battim 1 year ago
Alex Jones is away with the fairies ;-) One must wonder at times if Alex Jones has been mind altred to discredit the truth movement. I agrea with the core of you statement here, but call me a whack job if I don't people who profit from others, whether it be Mr Jones or Mr Cheney
BrutusCass 1 year ago
or mr obama. your bias is showing.
battim 1 year ago
Ok lets sit back a second here, now yes there is a lot of parnoid rubbish going around, but the belief that the governing power is there to sevre only good for the people is the Niavity that you should only find in 1970's porno films. Look you are a man who has a lot of critism of things and has reason some what on conplex matters, do you not think that decision which many would consider evil are not carried out for some concept of greater good in a few minds and then not comunicated to all?
BrutusCass 1 year ago
i never claimed that the government wasn't self interested. it does plenty of things overtly to come to that logical conclusion. using something as an excuse to profit is not the same as causing said thing to actually happen.
battim 1 year ago
They never found any bodies in "mass graves".
/watch?v=-wsxmCTScCE
cigolone1 2 years ago
I will subscribe cos you anti alex..good on you mate
411smiths 2 years ago
Why do so many people not know this shit about Ron Paul?
ConformisTV 2 years ago
because he is insignificant. really. why waste media time with a creationist who wants to put prayer in school who thinks global warming is a hoax. he's like a scary little lyndon larouche from the right.
battim 2 years ago
Holocaust is fake.Free Palestine
johnadam1234561 2 years ago
Comment removed
datstuffisglitch 2 years ago
I'm so glad that those emails leaked out about the global warming scam, because that's the beginning of the end for that shameful Gore humanoid and his eco-nazis and especially the int'l centralists who finally found an opportunity to build a strong foundation for their world gov't by gathering the world together behind the perfect cause, taking advantage of peope's sensitivity to the environment by mongering fear. Now we now that the world has been cooling and the polar bear is on the rise. :)
admasa01 2 years ago
I don't subscribe to the terms left vs. right extremism if they mean socialism vs. fascism. That's based on a faulty, archaic political spectrum invented by the Europeans, who have known nothing else but authoritarian society, whether it be kings, socialism, fascism and perhaps in the future Islamic shari'a. If both nazism and communism is absolute power (large gov't) and on opposite sides of the spectrum, are you saying that those who want small gov't like me are in the middle of that spectrum?
admasa01 2 years ago
In my view, fascism, socialism, islamism, any ideology where the individual is powerless and bullied by the majority is all far left and the farthest right is anarchy and 0% gov't. I must then be far right, as I believe in a micro gov't, a slight step away from anarchy and lawlessness, where the gov't has no more business than just protecting our individual rights and national security. Anything the gov't does beyond that is big brother, socialist, fascist, whatever you wanna call it.
admasa01 2 years ago
I actually believe there is a new world order in the making, but unfortunately it's not what those NWO nutjobs you mentioned think. I say unfortunately, because the reality is a lot worse than some imaginary secret society or elite ruling class running the show. Over the last years, I have studied the UN very closely and have seen how they gradually are trying to steal sovereignty from member nations and try to centralize power and create a world gov't.
admasa01 2 years ago
The problem is also that many like the idea of a world gov't, one currency, etc. They see it as a form of unity that will lead to peace and prosperity. They don't see the danger with putting all eggs in one basket. I mean can you imagine if this world gov't run by bureaucrats would fail economically and go bankrupt like Iceland did? Or that this gov't would bully those with opposing views and end public debate? I mean haven't we learned that power corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely?
admasa01 2 years ago
i'm not really all that certain. the right to left spectrum has gotten a little confusing lately. personally, i consider myself ambidextrous for that reason.
romeosevendelta 2 years ago
then why, when we have this nazi guy shooting people, is it call right wing terrorism?
isn't socialism a liberal ideal?
romeosevendelta 2 years ago
naziism ig germany was fascist, not socialist. nazism is a right wing idea. look it up. simply having socialism in their name means little, private industry thrived under hitler. they were no more socialist than the people republic of china was a republic.
battim 2 years ago
I beg to differ. The existence of a private industry alone does not constitute Capitalism. What existed under Hitler's regime was Corporatism, which is a progressive ideology. Capitalism can't thrive in a society where the gov't interferes with the free market and our individual rights, where there's absolute power and political opponents are silenced and killed.
In order for socialism to succeed, there must be as much gov't interference as possible. Free speech eventually kills socialism.
admasa01 2 years ago
nazism incorporated both right and left wing ideals into their form of governance. the idea of perfect races and social darwinism are certainly right wing. nationalized medicine certainly left wing. nazism rejects plurality. that is certainly right wing.
battim 2 years ago
Again, these left/right labels don't mean much if we're not on the same page about the definition. But for sake of argument, I consider myself right-wing and have conservative/libertarian views, meaning I want a small gov't, i.e. a micro gov't, i.e. a gov't that only protects our rights from being violated, i.e. a REAL capitalist, constitutional republic. Are you then implying that if I go farther to the right, I will at some point want a totalitarian/large/fascist/authoritarian/whatever gov't?
admasa01 2 years ago
Capitalism is color blind. One race or one collective mind or anything uniformed or homogeneous society is leftist, thus Nazism has been falsely attributed to right-wing. Social Darwinism is not about race but survival of the fittest, also not applicable to Capitalism.
admasa01 2 years ago
For those in the very bottom of society, who did or wanted less for whatever reason, are not forgotten, so it's not about survival of the fittest. If one needs a hand-out, private charity is superior to welfare. The Jews in biblical times invented the first organized private charity and were encouraged to give half a shekel of silver to the poor annually, but it wasn't forced through taxes.
admasa01 2 years ago
The poor were well taken care of and felt directly the generosity of his fellow man and that somebody cared, rather than feeling it was his human right to receive money from the state, which is cold and artificial. The giver also felt better about himself, because giving is a joy, while paying taxes is a heavy burden.
admasa01 2 years ago
Citizens of a free society, grow up more responsible and don't need a big brother to be generous on their behalf. Look at all the homeless in California, a blue state, how badly they are taken care of. Because everybody is expecting the gov't to do something and not enough people feel responsibility for their fellow man, because they were not brought up that way.
admasa01 2 years ago
You are right about National Socialism being a misnomer, but it's not the "socialist" part but rather the "national" part. The Nazi empire was clearly globalist, spreading to other nations, and not nationalist. Nationalism is the opposite of internationalism or globalism. There is no mention of anything global this-or-that in the constitution. If you believe in the U.S. constitution and think it reigns supreme over any int'l governing body, such as the UN, you are a nationalist, not a racist.
admasa01 2 years ago
For the same reason we call homicide bombings "suicide bombings." Old habit. Socialist, liberals, progressives are all on the page as a collective. It's just labels. To tell them apart is splitting hairs.
admasa01 2 years ago
Corr: the SAME page as a collective
admasa01 2 years ago
why is racism automatically a right wing trait?
abraham fucking lincoln was a republican!
romeosevendelta 2 years ago
there are plenty of racists on the left, take NOI and the Panthers, for instance.
battim 2 years ago
3 buildings all collapsing in the same way???? please.... these were all controlled demolitions....TOO MUCH of a coincidence....you dont have to be a clever individual to see what really happened here!!
billyandgeorgie1508 2 years ago
No but you are a moron if you think they collapsed the same way. One collapse from the top down...the other from the middle. Name one...just one...department of physics in the world that agrees with you. One academic source.
battim 2 years ago
i'm not a moron pal, infact i am quite the opposite...i just think there is a lot more to this than meets the eye...you have your opinion and i have mine....if i find that i have doubt about this topic anytime in the near future, i will gladly reply to you with an apology..cant say fairer than that can i?
billyandgeorgie1508 2 years ago
architectural departments and physics department the world over disagree with you. you based your opinions on what?
battim 2 years ago
And you remind me of paranoid delusional folks that have jackets whose arms tie in the back. Ballon boy dad. Like you and alex jones, are the delusional ones.
battim 2 years ago
eyes roll. yawn. thats called racism, blaming a race on anything is racism.
battim 2 years ago
you mean all of them. fairy tales and racism. thats your world.
battim 2 years ago
you caliming every physics and engineering expert in the world is a moron too?
battim 2 years ago
excuse me sir i just have one queston i cant say im a alex jones follower cause to me his totally too bias but.....the twin towers falling at free fall speed is impossible now i dont know the full truth but its very obvious that SOMETHING at least something is weird about all of that and the fact that building 7 fell when NO planes hit it and had minor fires in it too fell at free fall speed so maybe the towers could had fell but dude BUILDING 7 no planes hit it explain THAT please
azodyze 2 years ago
but for real battim you seem like a dude with lots of common sense but building seven has been ignored by everybody including the media i just want your take on it it would seem that that building is a huge clue in this whole 911 twin tower fiasco im just saying do you believethere isnt a hint not even a hint of bullshit played on the day of 9 11 by somebody not even our goverment but somebody shit including alex jones LOL
azodyze 2 years ago
building seven was affected by affects that are worse that a plane hitting it. the towers collapse causes tremors that rival small earthquakes. buidling seven was within ground zero of impact of two huge buildings hitting the ground. it literally detroyed its foundation. not to mention a half of day of burning inferno and debris that tooks at tens of thousands of square feet of its outer bearing wall. i'm surprised it stayed up as long as it did, frankly.
battim 2 years ago
okay thats agood point but on the tv it also fell at free fallspeed into its on ground no tilt effect no nothing same effect ass a demolition that ive seen on discovery channel 1000 times see my point is that with 3 different failures and all have different damaging events done to them so how can wih in a 30 to 45 minute period and actually its alot less all fall very similar this is actually impossible unless they are all hit at or affected in the same area and built the same food for thought
azodyze 2 years ago
when they say free fall speed they mean the time the roof took to get to point a to point b not the building the ROOF and yes it actually fail at free fall speed the same time it would had took a bowling ball to hit the ground if dropped from the roof tht you cant deny
azodyze 2 years ago
Well I can deny it was a controlled demo because there is no evidence of that. No skyscraper will react the same as another designed differently. According to engineers the world over. As oppsed to those who profit from conspriacies, the buidling reacted as it should have given the conditions.
battim 2 years ago
but see even more i think you refuse to believe the evidence of something else could have occured when there are evidences that are obvious to anyone with common logic i dont know your stand but it seems you deny alot which makes you and alex jones similar to me just too biased on the subject speading your own agendas i dont know what happens there good evidence on both sides but obviously the truth is being blured from allsides making even you a conspiracy theorist ......
azodyze 2 years ago
There is no physical evidence it was a comtrolled demo. There is physical evidence of structural deficiency. You side with speculation, I side with evidence and scientific consensus.
battim 2 years ago
they did not fall at free fall. otherwise the debris would have hit the bround at the same time, it simply did not.
battim 2 years ago
obviously you haven't read Kuhn yet, i tried.
lanceshitheadnada 2 years ago
When we're talking about Conspiracy theorists being nuts, are we talking about any Conspiracy? ...I mean, obviously not - there have been provable conspiracies in the past that have necessitated a word for the concept. Sometimes it just seems to me, like just as a lot of 'Conspiracy Theorists' are thought of, often correctly, as reactionary, it's a much more common form of reactionism to label the very concept of 'Conspiracy' as being a little hokey. What do you guys think?
Beowulf46 2 years ago
no i am specifically spealing of losse change and alex jones 911 truther movements. i made that clear.
battim 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
if you havent been to africa then fuck off cracker u stupid white people you guys anit shit all of yall need to burn and rot in hell
Asians blacks and any one of color/people of color are the best people in the world and then there is you guys the plauin white skined people the only people in the world with white skin so you guys are the different ones you
hippo4543227 2 years ago
9/11 was an inside job
DestroyerAlexandros 2 years ago
so was your conception. prove your premise.
battim 2 years ago
Give it a rest.
Capt777harris 2 years ago
no, there is no rest. what pisses me off is that all this shit is happening and some people dont even care
DestroyerAlexandros 2 years ago
proof. you made a premise. prove it.
battim 2 years ago
So, why do we have 30,000+ troops in Afghanistan? Why are our carrier groups conducting sorties around the world, and specifically in the Persian Gulf and Indian Ocean?
Is that part of the "inside job"?
Capt777harris 2 years ago
yes. americans needed an excuse to attack the middle east. so they set up a "terrorist attack" to use as an excuse. you dont understand your own system and what it is centered around
DestroyerAlexandros 2 years ago
Complete nonsense. The World Trade Center was the financial center for New York and much of the east coast of the United States. Why on EARTH destroy it? To attack the middle east? What for?
We crushed Saddam Hussein's military within a month. Had we wanted to, we would have attacked him earlier, AND WE DID. Same with Afghanistan.
Wars cost MONEY. That's why we're strapped for cash. Get real.
Capt777harris 2 years ago
why wage war???? wars are the most profitable thing there is. Saddam was an american agent, americans need people like him. you are so uninformed it drives me crazy. you dont know your own history. the reason america wages war is to keep the weapons industry going.
watch the movie Zeitgeist Addendum. Just google it, its a free movie to inform people about the world they live in and the shit america is doing. I recommend it to you man. dont buy the shit the capitalists are selling to you bro...
DestroyerAlexandros 2 years ago
Why not just conduct business as usual? You're missing a very large point, and that is wars cost money, and military personnel do not profit from warfare. The arms industry may, but they realize that their sales and profits are not only dependent on the Pentagon's budget, but also how much the Fed can afford to spend.
Right now we can't afford it. We're borrowing from Germany, China and Japan to fund these operations. If the US is so corrupt, then why don't you move to Mexico?
Capt777harris 2 years ago
The other larger point being that it makes no sense to bankrupt a nation. It's part of the reason cheap weapons are available, and not just high tech smart munitions.
The arms industry exists because it's needed, just like the whole reason we have a military. There are nations and other powers that want our resources, and vice versa. Destruction of those parties for profit is unprofitable, hence your argument is insane.
Wars are fought over resources. Go read a book.
Capt777harris 2 years ago
i've WRITTEN articles on this subject, trust me. not all wars are fought over resources. the military is unneeded, its just that you have been brainwashed from your day 1 into believing the military "protects" you. the USA is not protecting its resources by waging war in the middle east, it is ROBBING OTHER PEOPLE's resources. Do you honestly believe that the usa is "desperately" protecting its resources by fighting in the Rack and the ghan?
DestroyerAlexandros 2 years ago
You've written articles on the subject? Care to point me to one?
What is a "Rack" and "ghan"?
Capt777harris 2 years ago
What "articles" have you written? Have they been published in reputable journals, or is it just you spouting off on some web log?
Do you write for Time, The Economist, Janes Defense Weekly, National Review?
I'm really curious what "articles" you've written, and what more you have to say. I'm curious, and I think other people reading this exchange are also curious too.
Capt777harris 2 years ago
i think he writes for alex jones magazine of unsubstantiated fairy tale conspiracy theories journal.
battim 2 years ago
Then much is explained.
Capt777harris 2 years ago
i was playing, but he apparently wont answer you.
battim 2 years ago
Yeah, I figured. No worries.
When people like him post, even though most people laugh him off or ignore his type, it still gets to me because there're people gullible and honest enough to believe his nonsense. Time for me to move on :)
Capt777harris 2 years ago
hitler was a jew agent. i used to respect him at least a little bit but when i found out how he supported rich jews and how 1/2 of his government was jewish it all became clear - hitler is a joke
DestroyerAlexandros 2 years ago
oh a genocidal antisemite. hope that helps you sleep at night.
battim 2 years ago
no thats not how i am. i am 100% against racial discrimination... but.... i just think minorities and especially the jewish one are in the way of a unified social world. that DOESNT mean that we must terrorize them. what we must do is we must integrate them, make them normal citizens. and btw do you know that minorities like gypsies and jews have more rights than the citizens of the respective country?
DestroyerAlexandros 2 years ago
you had respect for him until you found out he didnt kill all the jews...thats what you said.
the are normal citizerns, to think any different is racist.
battim 2 years ago
was karl marx racist? the greatest economist and politician of all time. he foretold the path of society more than 100 years ago. he was partially jewish and STILL he didnt like the jews. he didnt want to kill them, he just knew what the economical facts said, on paper, nothing personal. and they spoke against the jewish minorities...
DestroyerAlexandros 2 years ago
marx was not a politician. he was a labor organizer, and not a very good one. marx never wrote anything antisemitic. we tried marx, he was not evil, but he was wrong.
battim 2 years ago
its called "on the jewish question" and depending on what agenda you're pushing it can be interpreted as anti-semitic or not. Truth is subjective kiddo. What every single idiot out there believes about 9/11 is truth to them. To conflate illuminati and anti-semtic shit with attempts to dig up facts on 9/11 is ignorant. If you think the 9/11 commission gave all the answers then you obviously haven't spoken with any of the family members of people that died that day.
lanceshitheadnada 2 years ago
Can you give me one academic source that agrees with any of the 911 truth movements? One academioc source. There is objective truths, there are also paranoid conspiracists that say thngs like "truth is subjective kiddo". At 41 I appreciate being called kiddo. What I don't appreciate is rationalizing murderous assholes with nazi ties that are motivated by paranoid theories.
battim 2 years ago
you fell victim to what is known as "shielding", investigating historical events does not get marketed so there is no maestro behind it dude. There is no like supreme 9/11 truth guy who i guess you think has "nazi ties". There are just a large amount of people who want more information about what happened that day. Certain individuals have conclusions, you wouldn't need to agree with their conclusions.
And truth is certainly subjective, I did not realize I was talking to a positivist.
lanceshitheadnada 2 years ago
i dont think he has nazi ties, the guy himself said so. lol.
battim 2 years ago
do you have a jstor login?
Which part of the 9/11 truth movement are you talking about?
Even for shit as farfetched as controlled demolition there are multiple articles published in peer reviewed journals.
If you want to know a little about "situated truth" in regards to 9/11 you can start with Zehfuss. Obviously alex jones is a jackass, but don't conflate him with the efforts for information on 9/11 just bc he proclaims himself king.
There are NO truths apart from a human to perceive it.
lanceshitheadnada 2 years ago
peer reviewed? peer reviewed and laughed at you mean. sicence works based on consesnus, there are quacks in every area of study. everything exists regardless of how we perceive. that things you speak of are sophistry, not math and science.
battim 2 years ago
positivism and arguments that objective truth exists are the foundational assumptions of fascism and racial supremacism. Without a person to perceive it there is no truth, truth does not exist apart from humans, and all humans are subjects. All humans filter what they say in a constant process of interpretation.
Be wary of people who claim universal truth exists, KILL THEM if they claim to know it.
lanceshitheadnada 2 years ago
things exist bound by rules regardless of whether a human exists to percieve it or not.
battim 2 years ago
Faggots are named Lance.
dewhicular 2 years ago
WTC 7 nuff said.
WillahG 2 years ago
lol. prove it.
battim 2 years ago
I don't like white people because they have sex with their close relatives and drink Starbuck's Coffee...however, i'm not racist.....
slickkapone 2 years ago
fuck you. you are racist.
flyingcow0 2 years ago
its all true
the thruth is outthere
battim = zionist agent :D
ataegena 2 years ago
where is my IDF paycheck?
battim 2 years ago
i was joking
it was a joke
you taked my post serious lol
I ended my post with a big open smile
For Alex Jones and conspiracy theorists you are a zionist agent you talk(ridicularize) like one in there opinion
ataegena 2 years ago
my comment was a joke
battim 2 years ago
R Y OK ?
remusvivi 2 years ago
? .
remusvivi 2 years ago
Look at the body language from the 1 minute mark.
Another poor rambling vid from the growing army of advert whore vloggers.
At least decide on your own opinions
before you rant jumbled garbage you google add scat muncher.
ButcherWing369 2 years ago
i am assuming english is your second language based on the poor grammar.
battim 2 years ago
You assume wrong you whiney cunt, like most of the shitty vlogs you make.
Keep doing your putrid vocal patterns and false facial expressions you wannabe intellectual darwinist arse licker.
"I am assuming you are a twat based on the poor vlogs"
fuk u anel gramma natsiz i doant ker
ButcherWing369 2 years ago
you are a strange little man. evolution is the way life develops, thats not darwinism, its evolution. and you may be proof natural selection does choose idiots. lol. moron.
battim 2 years ago
Dude those guys that beleive in all that "big brother" crap and the government wants to take them down, The government has bigger fish to fry than some ignorant racist who obviously lacks any sort of intellegence so they resort to violence. It makes no sense as to why the government doesnt do something to them but oh yeah theyre giving them their constitutional right to say what they want to say, or feel how they want to feel. Theyre walking talking oxymorons.
TheKevineaddy 2 years ago
amen.
battim 2 years ago
BTW, you should post those racist Ron Paul newsletters on the web for all to see.
takomaguy 2 years ago
go to the national review, a conservative paper online and do a search. they are all over the place.
battim 2 years ago
I have to pass the hospital this guy is in once a week. I swear I can't wait for the trial. I really plan to go and watch, maybe blog on it.
takomaguy 2 years ago
ron paul is the george wallace of this generation
howthefagworks 2 years ago
ron paul is an intellectual imp.
battim 2 years ago
what a twat!!!!!!!!!!
broersz 2 years ago
This guy is cute. I bet he's great in bed...
...Sorry- just sayin.
broadbent48 2 years ago
WHAT THE FUCK EVER.
From what your saying; would you support Blackwater ops in your home town to find the "domestic terrorist". HEY we got domestic terrorist!! Okay, lets suspend the Constititution even further get rid of the Bill of Rights, right to free speech, bear arms, no standing arming, no warrants for search/seisures, no more habeus corpus. WHEN WILL YOU FEEL SAFE? when we are a fascist/communistic nation? Slippery slope battim.
btw, even a clock is right two times a day.
bdmenne 2 years ago
when did i say i'd support blackwater doing anything domestically? slippery slope is making a hero out of a nazi. keep defending hate. brilliant. lol.
battim 2 years ago
you are so handsome !!!!!!
77Merav 2 years ago
Are you saying there were no mind control experiments during WW2? I'm not saying that this was the case with this guy. But the CIA was performing mind control experiments. You can't deny that.
ChangeTheRide 2 years ago
there were'nt any successful ones....and that is called triangulating, its what conspiracists do.
battim 2 years ago
Well, sometimes conspiracy theorists are right. What about JFK. Do you think Lee Harvey acted alone? Do you even think he pulled the trigger? I am pretty certain he was set up. I find the Warren Commission to be highly suspicious. Then you have Howard Hunt's confession. Seems pretty damn obvious the CIA was involved in the assassination of JFK. You just seem to be saying there are no conspiracies at all, which seems unlikely.
ChangeTheRide 2 years ago
nothing indicates the bullets came from anywhere, as the film and experimientation shows, but where oswald was. as for Hunt, its been shown time and again he was neither one of the three tramps and that his deathbed accusation was implausible.
battim 2 years ago
Firthermore Hunt never confessed, in fact, reiterated he has nothing to do with it. He only speculated Harvey and LBJ had motive. He never claimed to be part of it.
battim 2 years ago
"So there it was, according to E. Howard Hunt. LBJ had Kennedy killed. It had long been speculated upon. But now E. Howard was saying that's the way it was. And that Lee Harvey Oswald wasn't the only shooter in Dallas. There was also, on the grassy knoll, a French gunman, presumably the Corsican Mafia assassin Lucien Sarti, who has figured prominently in other assassination theories." - Part of the Hunt Confession
Anyone who denies CIA involvement in the JFK assassination is not fit for society.
ChangeTheRide 2 years ago
E. Howard Hunt, again, never, ever said this was true. as in a court, second hand story telling is irrelevant, source hunt saying he said that.
battim 2 years ago
alex jones is scum.
911TRUTHINATOR 2 years ago
you are a moron who apprantly likes to copy and paste from anti vaccine websites. (next time try rewording it, you can google plagiarists pretty easy). You are ignoring Hap A and B vaccines, influenza, Repeated infections with influenza virus are common due to rapid antigenic variation of the viral envelope glycoproteins.
battim 2 years ago
Antibodies to the viral neuraminidase and haemagglutinin proteins protect the host from infection. However, because of the rapid antigenic variation, new vaccines, containing antigens derived from influenza strains currently circulating in the community, are produced every year.
battim 2 years ago
A live attenuated strain of varicella zoster virus has been developed. Apparently you are reading 15 year old documentation. In people like you, in your wolr,d losing untold millions of folks unvaccinated justifies losing a handful from vaccine's very low innoculation rates. You ignore that a tiny percent die of vaccines, but millions are saved from the, typical.
battim 2 years ago
Subscribed.
chrisbord 2 years ago
now, when you come here, remember to source your opinions based on facts.
battim 2 years ago
Opinions can't be fact-based, dip-fuck!
Chainsasw88Gutsfuck 2 years ago
Wow! Are you stupid? Rendering a judgment is what results in an opinion. Every interpretted event, all of human experience, requires forming opinions. Grow a brain.
shattersidvik 2 years ago
"Every interpretted event, all of human experience, requires forming opinions. " correct, and unless they are done so based on controlled empiricism they have no sound reasoning, did you skip critical thinking in college?
battim 2 years ago
This doesn't answer the question, so I guess the gray colored beard 3 years earlier doesn't exist. Ok, I understand your critical thinking now.
charlesfloyb 2 years ago
that was not a response to your beard comment but to chainsaw
battim 2 years ago
Battim, you are shooting the wrong guy. I was addressing the false either/or of knowledge is either opinion or fact. Opinions differ in quality based upon the strength of their objective reference. Our judgments should always be based on sound reason. Check your aim, buddy.
shattersidvik 2 years ago
no doubt, the context i thought was a response to me, not to gutsfuck, who apparently lives by his name. comment sections are pititful on youtube for figuring out who one is pseaking to. i apologize, in that its apparent we agree.
battim 2 years ago
It;s all good. For you it is like a shooting gallery so judging between baddie and civilian can be tricky. My comments tend to be abstract so I get hit alot by my own side.
shattersidvik 2 years ago
opinions should always be based on facts, otherwise they are useless, apparently you have no idea what a legal opinion is, something based on precedent and legal facts. lol
battim 2 years ago
I get a kick out of how self-righteously pompous leftists are! If you fucking listen to every side of the story, you wouldn't have to spend all your time bitching about one side from another side. Ron Paul has solid politics that I have yet to see argued successfully.
Chainsasw88Gutsfuck 2 years ago
reallyl ike dreationism should be taugh in schools of praying in school. which ron paul policy do you like? lol. ron paul is a joke. a pysician who denies evolution, a charlatan who wont release the ron paul newsletter because it race baits. ron paul is a joke. i'm not leftist, and ron paul is a moron.
battim 2 years ago