Swedish government assistance made massmurder possible!

[TheFyaah]

This is FUCKED UP...! WHEN did ANYONE think fire could be put out with fire?? When did we get so stupid that we Produce this shit and then try to fight it with the same SHIT!?

[MinaVanner]

Stop the killing of the Iraqs and Afeghans children!

[Semael666]

This is a COUNTERWEAPON! Artillery and robots are used to bomb civilians in lots of conflicts all over the world... This weapons actually pinpoint enemy artillery preventing it from continuing the bombardments.

And to say that Bush is a criminal. What facts do u have on that?

[SwedishDictatorship]

Ha ha... Swedish government sells weapons to USA so Bush and other criminals can do robbery...

It´s not important to see how effective weapons are and ask your self who is the enemy that USA points out, and why do sheeple always think USA is right?

[lrmis11111]

is "Thank you" inappropriate?

[Scurck]

So without a system that detects stuff flying though the air the United States could not have occupied Iraq...?

Do you think that make any sense at all?

[SwedishDictatorship]

The words from US army General was that it would not be possible... Pehaps You have little knowledge about Swedish weapon systems? Because the Swedish government do not want the whole world to know about their huge involvement in wars.

[Scurck]

Please provide a source to that statement then.

I have plenty of knowledge about Swedish weapon systems. As you might have noticed I have the exact same video on my channel...

Sweden produces advanced weapons that reduce civilian casualties. Without this system, USA would have had to resort to the old-style "bomb everything". But now equipped with this system they just needed to fire a few shells with pinpoint accuracy to take out the target.

Swedish weapons = less civilian deaths

[SwedishDictatorship]

USA invasion is "new style bank robbery". NOT saving the world. Swedish support all wars when the Swedish weapons or government companies will proffit.

[Scurck]

USA did not need any reason to invade Iraq other then to remove Saddam. That was a good enough reason in itself.

When a nation chooses to buy new weapons they will get them whether Sweden is the supplier or not. They will choose the most efficient weapons, which means that it will hit what it is aimed at = less collateral damage. If the Swedish weapons are picked over the other choices this means the Swedish weapons where more efficient and there will be less collateral damage...