If thats where you're at- so be it. I do hope you continue to dig into 9/11. There is a lot more to it than most have given thought to. And for good reason.
People thought they got a full story from the media- and they saw it with their own eyes "on Tv". Ahh.. the archived footage.. its a pesk.. it won't go away.
I'll be uploading some of Judy Woods investigation and her findings.
Let me say- her answers seem the most scientific and plausable.
He thought from the explosion it must have been a bomb. If i was there i may have thought the same thing before id seen the hundreds of different videos showing the plane.
@hitech98 He thought he saw everything. Didnt he also say it was a bomb? Did he see the bomb? What about all the video footage and photos taken by members of the public?
Seems a bit far fetched to me that they flew the airliner elsewhere, and instead had something else explode in the 2nd tower when everyones eyes were on it, whilst at the same time superimpose an image of a plane in real time on live tv.
@jhuan0 I listed many irrefutable facts that are inconsistent - also shown on live tv - Do you have a comment about the ghost plane entering the building? It seems there are many far fetched & unexplainable things about 9/11. 1. 3 wtc buildings were destroyed faster than physics can explain (at free fall speed "collapse"). 2. WTC1, 2 & 7 literally underwent mid-air pulverization and were turned to dust before they hit the ground.
@hitech98 Yea, so he probably didnt see 'everything', just an explosion. And all those photos and videos of the second plane probably prove it was indeed a plane. The 'ghosting' from the blurry video footage could have looked like the nose came out the other side, but was probably not actually the nose. Hundreds of eyewitnesses vs a blurry silohette....i personally go with overwhelming evidence it was a plane.
If thats where you're at- so be it. I do hope you continue to dig into 9/11. There is a lot more to it than most have given thought to. And for good reason.
People thought they got a full story from the media- and they saw it with their own eyes "on Tv". Ahh.. the archived footage.. its a pesk.. it won't go away.
I'll be uploading some of Judy Woods investigation and her findings.
Let me say- her answers seem the most scientific and plausable.
hitech98 5 months ago
He thought from the explosion it must have been a bomb. If i was there i may have thought the same thing before id seen the hundreds of different videos showing the plane.
jhuan0 5 months ago
@jhuan0 His last words were " I saw everything".
Here's the problem with all those "plane" videos -
Depends on which network you were watching as to what you saw.
At least 1 network just showed a explosion. no plane.
At least 2 networks showed a different approach to the target.
One dived bombed, another showed a level approach- straight on.
All showed the plane "ghosting" thru the steel and concrete wtc.
No collision or impact. "It exploded" after it entered the wtc.
Tv illusions.
hitech98 5 months ago
@hitech98 He thought he saw everything. Didnt he also say it was a bomb? Did he see the bomb? What about all the video footage and photos taken by members of the public?
Seems a bit far fetched to me that they flew the airliner elsewhere, and instead had something else explode in the 2nd tower when everyones eyes were on it, whilst at the same time superimpose an image of a plane in real time on live tv.
jhuan0 5 months ago
@jhuan0 I listed many irrefutable facts that are inconsistent - also shown on live tv - Do you have a comment about the ghost plane entering the building? It seems there are many far fetched & unexplainable things about 9/11. 1. 3 wtc buildings were destroyed faster than physics can explain (at free fall speed "collapse"). 2. WTC1, 2 & 7 literally underwent mid-air pulverization and were turned to dust before they hit the ground.
Also Check out Dr Judy Woods. She's right on.
hitech98 5 months ago
@hitech98 Yea, so he probably didnt see 'everything', just an explosion. And all those photos and videos of the second plane probably prove it was indeed a plane. The 'ghosting' from the blurry video footage could have looked like the nose came out the other side, but was probably not actually the nose. Hundreds of eyewitnesses vs a blurry silohette....i personally go with overwhelming evidence it was a plane.
It wasnt free fall speed.
Physics do explain the collapse. Bombs or planes.
jhuan0 5 months ago