The plane does not fit into the hole. Do the measurements. ALL of the titanium should have been left. It melts at around 3,400 F. I wanna say I heard the fire burned at a "cool" 1900F. which burns the aluminum. If the wings were sheared off, where are they? They would not have melted, they would have been left out on the lawn, but the lawn was unscathed.
teh bodies e-vaporize on impact. dna however persists, u just have to know exactly where to locate it. then easily identify body it/they was come from.
No wing/engine marks on the building from the front view.. also no wings/engines on the lawn from this video. So they immediately evaporated on impact? hah The inside job isn't the conspiracy the fact that this is the only video released to the public is the conspiracy.. especially when we know there's at least 5 if not 80 clearer videos. I bet their having a good time eating popcorn while they watch the real videos in special Pentagon HD with NASA surround sound in their CIA I MAX theater
@JGH8sDaDebunkerz the wings would NOT have left a mark on the building they would NOT have stood up to the blast proofing of the pentagon which also explains why there was such a small hole left in the building.
@IIZODIIAC OK so the 2 huge titanium engines vaporized as well and left no marks. The story is impossible no matter what debunking tactics you use. 8th grade physics vs A government that lies about everything and is still at war 10 years later. I don't want revenge on 19 patsies I want the troops to come home, the boarders to be protected, & America to be America again instead of NAZI Germany 2.0.
@zenoist2 there are no better videos, these are the best videos they had, all the others are pointless because the cameras recording were NOT high speed cameras which explains exactly why we didnt see the plane hit but a slow explosion.
9/11 was an inside job for about 70 reasons, 1 reason alone can be considered coincidence, 2 is suspicious, 3 is inside job, 4 is a blatant inside job, but 70??? conspiracies happen, this was one of them, mass murder for personal gain! Oil, opium and bases in the middle east, better to take from the weak before other superpowers (russia, china) do! We may benefit in the long run when we fill up our cars, but it doesn't make 9.11 ok! Mass murder! the shills will attack me but i don't care!
Pause the video at 25 and after 26 seconds and see the white smoke. I've not seen any white smoke with passenger planes taking off or landing. I have seen white smoke on cruise missile videos though. The frame skipping prevents us from seeng it and also lack of sound from hearing it. Surely there must be a better video with sound too.
This is so clearly a missile strike it's not funny. Pause it at :39 The aircraft was supposedly completely burned from intense fires, but seconds after impact, there is already nothing there. Including a fire!!! It was one burst of flames, then gone!!!
Check the photos of the impact hole. You will see a NO PARKING sign inches from the breach in the wall that shows no effects of any fire whatsoever. And anyone who watches this video closely and has any common sense can clearly see it's not a jet.
I'm not some super genius, but... pausing @ 0:25... that does NOT look like a Boeing 757 to me. O.o Those things are HUGE... whatever that is... doesn't seem very big at all. I don't know. Not the best footage obviously, but still...
What I see at :25 is the smoke-stream of a missile. If that were really the tail of the plane, the rest would clearly be visible. It was supposed to be a jumbo jet, remember? The Pentagon was merely a way of steering away suspicion from the real facts of what took place on 9/11. But clearly, this is not a plane at all. .
@bartman5347 You say that it was supposed to be a Jumbo Jet? This is the first time that anyone ever said that it was a Jumbo Jet. American Airlines say that it was a Boeing 757, not a 747 which is the Jumbo Jet. The difference is that the 747 can carry over 416 passengers and has a 3 aisle cabin. The cabin width is 20.1 ft across. The wing span is 224 ft.7 in. and tail height is 63 ft.6 in. The 757 carries up to 228 passengers and has a single aisle cabin, The exterior cabin width cont
Respond to this video... is 12 ft. 4 in. The wing span is 124 ft (100 ft less than the 747). Both planes normal cruise speed is 573mph for most fuel efficiency. Both is 0.80 mach. If it would have been a 747 there would been more damage than this. Please pay respects to one of the victims of the the 911 Pentagon attacks, Melissa Rose Barnes at The Washington Post 911victims. All of the victims are listed.
@25 seconds you can actually see something resembling an aircraft immediately above the right most orange cone. It looks almost as if the aircraft has landed, but it would take an incredible feat of airmanship to keep that aircraft level at ground level and high speed.
I agree with warmaker911, I was thinking the same exact thing, #1 how in the hell is a 757 that close to the ground unless from take off also I am sorry but it does look more like a missile then a plan
any sensible person who knows nothing about the 'terrorist attacks' as propogated by the govt. would say that it was a MISSILE and not a commercial aircraft
At a Pentagon briefing the day after 9/11 Ed Plaugher (fire chief) who put out the fire at the Pentagon said there was only small pieces of the plane left but no large sections like fuselage engine and even seats. The Pentagon said that there were no identifiable pieces of plane left except for black box. There was no evidence but it waaass a plane and they say a fire melted and vaporized all identifiable pieces.
However they managed to fingerprint the bodies? Strange.
There is No WAY in the WORLD a 747 737 733 766 hit this building HAAAAAAAAA I can't believe this shit Why would this be the only video they would release ? SMH We gotta do something about all these Lies then been telling us For Years it's getting way out of Hand .
im sick and fucking tired of all these idiots posting comments on how the government orchested all of this. it's an insult to all those innocent civilians who died in these attacks from AL-QAEDA, not the damn U.S. government. its amazing how many people believe in all of that bullshit. after this disaster, you couldn't by a goddamn american flag anywhere because they were sold out. now everyones' bitching because of the economy. you disgrace your country by believing in that nonsense.
@dannyb13579 That's fine and all but when its A fact that our government created AL-QAEDA, Bush/Bin Laden Family did business together, The Blocking of FBI investigations into AL-QAEDA before 9/11, The VISA section blocking the terrorist from getting in the country then getting over ruled by CIA officials, Then training at US bases, Its not a surprise people aren't buying the official story,,, Then all the anomalies of Planes & Steel & Wreckage & Building Collapse, Seems like a scripted movie
@JGH8sDaDebunkerz first of all thanks for not being a douchebag or an idiot. and i see what your saying. im a bit skeptical too but until i find concrete proof that the goverment did it im believing what i saw.
@dannyb13579 That's cool, I never knew the official story aside from some terrorist w box cutters Then 1 day 2 years ago I saw video of Building 7. I live 45 mins from where this building collapsed and never heard about it. I was addicted to studying 9/11 & the US governments shady ways after that. My opinion they definitely orchestrated it. Sadly like JFK we'll never know the truth.. Thanx 4 not being a dick too, Whose to say I'm a "twoofer" or your a "sheep" only high-up's know what went down
@JGH8sDaDebunkerz i actually just went to the pentagon memorial yesterday, and its pretty powerful shit. as i said before, until i find concrete evidence, im believing what i saw.
you can definitly see a white trail and a little "fin" sticking up over the right hand corner of the pillar box........hard to tell , and hard to get round that a massive plane is hidding behind this box.....if "truthers" bother people so much then why not release more evidence and put this issue to bed
I used to love my country... i was a proud american. I now am so frustrated at our corrupt government and so mad that we would deliberately kill our own citizens in the name of greed. I am sad to be an american and I really do hate what we have become.
This is obviously not a fucking 757 if you think so you are an idiot and should be made sterile so as not to reproduce more retards... Looks like a missile to me FUCK THE GOVERNMENT AND THEIR EVIL TWISTED LIES!!!
So fucking dumb, this isn't a plane. Tell us the truth now, fucking ZOG US GOVERNMENT SHITS. Killing innocent people, slaughtering iraqis who are innocent, murdering 3000 americans, the US government is evil.
Flight 77’s cockpit door never opened during flight. The Flight Data Recorder (FDR) begins recording the flight door status once the pilots are in their seats and readying for takeoff, and the plane cannot take off unless the FDR is working.
If the cockpit door never opened, how could the hijackers storm the cockpit and herd the pilots to the back of the plane? The data, which originated from the government, does not support the official story.
@AlaskaFarewell a 757 is 155 ft 3 in does what you see in the video look 155 ft 3 in? i mean yeah its white like a plane and it appears to have a tail on it but American airlines paint their planes red while blue and silver and the "plane" in the video is white and appears smaller than a 757 all i'm saying is don't you think thats a bit odd?
The object in the video is over 140 feet, even if you don't wish to say it was as Flight 77, your chocies for what it could be are quite limited, and nearly all end and start with either airliners, or cargo jets.
We know however that is flight 77 for more than couple reason, we have expert witnesses from the scene including a C-130 pilot whom was flying and tracked and nearly RAN INTO the plane.
We have American Airline lingerie everywhere, an FDR saying it's from 77.
@IntelArt They're already coming true, Lady arrested for home schooling, 10 FEMA governors/camps, Lady arrested for growing a garden, people arrested for silence dancing at the Jefferson Memorial, Poisoning of the food & water & vaccinations, Illegal wars, A police chief firing the towns Mayor for exposing corruption and holding secret meeting, Soldiers doing check points in America, TSA groping people now expanding to supermarkets/proms/train stations, surveillance grids, Genetic engineering...
The plane appearing smaller can be contributed to the distortion of the camera that taped it, as well as the angle it was filming it at, which wasn't completely perpendicular.
There's nothing strange here, only people coming off the street trying to make assertions of something that is beyond their know-how to determine, and coming to erroneous conclusions.
People have done it over the moon landing, the Titanic sinking, so this is nothing new, and nothing relevant.
your so blind the moon landings were filmed in some dudes garage and Titanic never existed its all a plot so the snakeheads can put aids in our cola so we vote republican!!!
i am just kidding btw but i will admit i have no idea what I'm talking about and i don't even care weather or not 9/11 was an inside job or not i don't even live in the US, i was wondering how many thumbs up i could get with a sweeping statement and then i felt i had to defend the opinion that i had expressed, sorry...
If the entire plane fit in the viewing area (159 ft.), the camera was at 4 frames per second, there was 30 feet of the nose of the plane exposed at frame #1 (per object in video entering the frame), and the speed was 300 mph, we would be able to see 88% of the plane in frame #2, and 57% of the plane in frame #3. To not see the plane at all under these assumptions the plane would have had to be traveling at 435 mph, which is highly unlikely.... There was no plane......
The plane could have been flying at 435 mph, there's no obstacle to that, the engines had that power, and Boeing designs its aircraft with a 50% saftey margin, which they don't even have to demonstrate anymore thanks to the re-written FARs on the subject.
And we get ALL of the plane in the first frame, minus what the light post was hiding, here it is highlighted:
/watch?v=iBHi9CbrNf4
Your data will always be flawed, if you aren't aware what the true factors involved are.
The pilot couldn't do it, "The speed, the maneuverability, the way that he turned, we all thought in the radar room, all of us experienced air traffic controllers, that that was a military plane" Why did Flight 77 make a complicated 330-degree turn around the Pentagon, before hitting it in an area that had recently been reinforced? They could of flew straight down and killed Rumsfeld, whose office was on the other side of the building. They wont release the videos its too shady its a cover up.
Also, that isn't their quote, you fail. Those are dulles controllers, they RARELY ever see military aircraft on their scopes, and when they have something moving at over 400 mph, and flying on paths airliners don't normally travel, what are they supposed to think?
They, however, don't deny it was flight 77, so that's fail 2.
@AlaskaFarewell Are you the type that takes witness accounts from the pentagon as 100% fact, but don't listen to the people who reported bombs and explosions going off all over the building and in the basements of the wtc
As to the "explosions", I've heard of people whom thought the sound of glass breaking was a GUNSHOT.
Most of the witnesses aren't people privy to combat zones, do they know, truly, what en explosive going off is? No, and were there OTHER things exploding that day? Absolutely,
There are benign, domestic explanations for the explosions, which have nothing to do with explosives, you should look them up.
@AlaskaFarewell A lot were from cops & firemen There's a video of an explosion The lobby was blown to shit and people got blown up in the basements. The buildings came down at near free fall. all those steel columns were gone in secs which weren't even close to the fire, 90,000 tons of concrete turned into a fine dust, thermite in the dust, molten metal days after, over 100 first responders heard explosions If you match what they heard compared to all the evidence of what happen its no question
Alaskafarewell I dont claim to know it all, it was a terrible day, I got out of my college class at 850 that mourn, went to skyline drive n watched it all go down in NYC, terrible day, my friend dan's mother worked in north tower, but i enjoy investigating it. I looked up the engines, some sites are saying 737 engine, others are saying 757, other military. Im not a pilot but from pilot testimonies they say it was some intense steering that 20 yr vets would have trouble pulling off.
It doesn't matter what "some sites say", I gave you a diagram MATCHING the parts, a 737 does not use the RB211s, they were SPECIFICALLY made for the Boeing 747, 757 and 767, those are your only choices.
As to "20 year vets", I can do you one way better, say hello to the Allied Pilots Association, the UNION for 20,000 American Airline pilots whom fly these planes FOR A LIVING, their members have put this to the test, and they have found the only obstacle being an ALARM.
I understand fully what the aircraft pulled off in flight.
The aircraft was under AUTOPILOT for all but 8 minutes, and then for 5 minutes of that the guy flew straight and level.
It is only 3 minutes here that matter, and even then, nothing difficult was pulled off, the ONLY thing you could say was that he got lucky that the lamp posts didn't cause him to crash pre-maturely, and that does not take skill, NO amount of skill would save you from a pole dissecting the plane, it is purely luck.
@LucaTurilli89 Hijacking and Maneuvering an aircraft of that size at those speeds flying a foot off the ground hitting light poles without touching the ground going through three rings of the pentagon leaving little to no wreckage and a perfect punch out hole when its been reported he couldn't even fly a small one engine Cessna.. some pilots would say that's an impossible feat
None of these links work, and I went to the website when I click on to read it takes me to pages that say its no long exist. Look you can believe what you want I wasn't even talking to you. Just stating what i think happened. The pentagon doesn't add up no matter how many shitty websites you send me to but i tried. I saw the 2 cops interviewed that disagree with the flight path, other people will go along with the government to save their job. You weren't there so you'll never kno
"doesn't add up"? Whatever, the flight path is irrelevent, since 104 people saw it COLLIDE with the Pentagon's facade, from what exact angle it orginally came from is a fine detail at best, in no way does it change those people's testimonies.
The Pentagon's situation DOES add up, stating otherwise only means you're not familiar enough with it.
Hell, the only case 9/11 "scholars" can make about the Pentagon attack is the flight path, if that's all, we're done here.
@AlaskaFarewell No the flight path means something when huge light poles are knocked down all over the place and a bunch of witnesses including 2 police who work at the pentagon say the plane wasn't anywhere near them.
@AlaskaFarewell I saw the interview with the guy who was in the building, ran outside after the hit and saw a plane leaving the scene it was awhile ago but ill look for it and send you the link
I was saying its impossible for an inexperienced pilot to pull off the turn, hit light poles, and fly a few feet off the ground at 400 mph with out hitting the ground. Hanji hanjour had a COMMERCIAL LICENSE when he got here, HIS flight instructor said he was a terrible pilot. Michael Springmann of the visa section didn't want to give the terrorist visa's but C.I.A. officers repeatedly overruled him and ordered the visas to be issued. These guys were let in the country the whole thing was a setup
The turn was 330 degrees,meaning it had an angle of about 30 degrees, the bank angle was only 32 to 45 degrees, which is only SLIGHTLY above standard.
And you think that's hard? Then YOU do not fly, and certiantly doesn't help your case that Hani Hanjour, who had a commercial license would have practiced such turns ENDESSLY, the fact that the turn rate wasn't held steady is a GIVE AWAY the pilot behind the controls was lacking polish.
And stop talking about the "terrible flying" comments, if you didn't know the turn itself was benign thing to do, then it's obvious you also don't know what FAA standards are.
Let me clue you in, they are kept VERY high, and just because you fail them, it does NOT mean you can't fly a plane, it only means you likely can't fly a plane SAFE enough to meat their standards.
And since there was NOTHING safe about what Hanjour did, this point is moot, and done with.
3 QUESTIONS 911 TRUTHERS DON'T WANT YOU TO ASK THEM:
How many of Architects & Engineers for 911 Truth's 1400+ architectural and engineering professionals have experience in structural engineering, high rise construction, or controlled demolition?
What did Hani Hanjour’s flight instructors have to say about his flying ability?
Who was Ali Mohamed and what is his relationship with Osama Bin Laden and the CIA?
@ctcole77 IS A TROLL DON'T WASTE YOUR BREATH OR TYPING ON THIS VERY SPECIAL TROLL, IT IS A CREATION OF THE CIA. RESPOND AND IT WILL COME BACK WITH 3 RANDOM DEBUNKED 9/11 QUESTIONS HAHA BUT FOR FUN YOU CAN RESPOND TO IT AND DEBUNK THE QUESTIONS. THEN NASA SCIENTIST WILL HAVE TO COME IN AND UPDATE THE PROGRAM, WASTING THEIR TIME. NOTE- THIS WILL RESULT IN THE WASTING OF TAX DOLLARS
@JGH8sDaDebunkerz wtf where the hell did you get the information that the CIA allowed the terrorists visas? Stupid conspiracy theorists love creating their own stories, and it's funny how their are so much different versions of 9/11 conspiracists. If you were right then there would only be one story with a shit load of proof. SMH
@TheMentoesGuy Not everyones crazy as shit just making things up like space beams and invisible planes. hah look up Mike Springman. He was US consulate and a foreign service official. I'm just stating facts from his interviews. Springman went public (after internal efforts failed) to expose the State Dept/CIA conduiting terrorists into the US. The same thing happend with Canadian Officials, they were flagged the state department makes a call and they were let in. Look it up it was in the news
Nobody said they saw the plane hit the building! They saw a plane in the area, there was a Cargo Plane ordered to check out the area & the doomsday plane. This was a small military guided plane with a missile. No shitty Cessna pilot can hijack a Boeing 757 with a box cutter, find the pentagon, fly it impossible speeds low to the ground, leave a hole smaller than the plane,a punch out hole threw 3 rings & leave no trace of a plane, except for a tiny engine that doesn't fit the plane. Come on!
"Nobody said they saw the plane hit the building!"
Wrong, 104 people saw it, including 6, like firefighter Alan Wallace, whom had to duck out of the way, the C-130 Pilot, and THIS guy, only a few yds away:
/watch?v=YVDdjLQkUV8#t=3m48s
Hanji hanjour had a COMMERCIAL LICENSE, he KNEW how to fly planes like those.
Impossible speeds? No, 400+ mph is not impossible, it's well within the engine's output.
If you're not bothering to do the reasearch, stop talking.
They found a tiny engine, your saying that's from a Boeing? The engine rotor, if the evidence was not planted, is consistent with a small jet aircraft such as the Navy S-3B, the F-15, the F-16 or the F-18; definitely not from a Boeing 757-223.One witness that reported seeing a 8-10 seat passenger plane, others reported a small rear-engined jet, which would be consistent with the Navy T-39 Sabreliner.Look at this damn video! Your the crazy conspiracy theorist if you believe the government
Aqui está claro que es un misil de tierra tierra, osea que lo lanzarón desde tierra, lo que yo me pregunto es ¿ donde está el avión que dicen que se estrello aquí?
Well one reason might be that the plane is moving so fast(400 kts give or take) AND the cops' back is to the plane. And just exactly who is going to call him on the radio? Air traffic control? NORAD? Maybe the US Govt. telling him to keep his head facing forward! "CAR 54, CAR 54, DO NOT LOOK TO YOUR RIGHT, OVER. If you very closely in the last frame before the plane hits the building, you can see it's vertical stabilizer above the ticket dispensor.
there was a guy there.. 15 seconds before it hit.. how didnt he see a plane coming down.. and he was the police.. why didnt he get a report of a plane on his radio.
i'd like to dedicate my new video to the memory of lisa beamers husband, who died valiantly crashing flight 93 into a hole which was already there, may he rest in pieces, where ever they may be.
Dude, if you had government agent walk into your house and say, "If you dont do as we say, we will kill your entire family and you" would you give a rats as about being a hero?
As for the plane who knows? -_- And hows this for a reason.
The boston massacre was true but distorted to make it seem like the people were innocent and the british evil. Im saying that when the planes hit, that our gov't planted explosives to make sure the towers fell. Is that hard to believe?
If 9/11 was a conspiracy, that means the government killed 2 thousand of their own. What I laugh at is if they can kill 2000, why couldn't they kill only a few more people who are trying to convince everyone it was? The Pentagon is the only one I don't understand.
well if you dont understand the pentagon just like i dont then why would we expect anything different from the other incidents??. do you see a plane in this video? because i dont see one at all!! i see smoke just like if a missle was shot it would have a trail of smoke behind it. im not saying what i think and making any speculations but i know what i see.
More then enough to answer whatever you're spewing, as when you were a frequent visitor of the Pentagon for 6 years, it comes with the territory.
And far more often then not, truther theories come down to them not knowing what's at the Pentagon, becaue they've never even bothered to visit the site.
No, 103 people saying a plane hit the building mean there's a plane, the finding of the CVR and matching the serial number to the one used by N644AA means there was a plane, an APU door, landing gear, and cockpit parts from a 757-200 means there was a plane, the bodies and their identities confirmed via DNA means there was a plane, and debris like this:
@AlaskaFarewell no there was no plane, not a passenger one anyway, dna can be made up as easily as dental records can be switched. Plane parts from a small military jet cannot also be from a passenger jet. Also vaporise means 'turns into vapor'. Titanium engines dont do that. 100's of ppl we never see or hear about who never botheredto pick up a camera and film what they see? even with a cellphone? nope no plane, it simply didnt happen
Yes, it was a passenger plane, the parts recovered from the wreck support that.
There were no parts from a "small military plane", the engine parts were from a Rolls Royce engine used SPECIFICALLY by 757-200s, and the same engines Flight 77 was using.
The same to the landing gear hub caps, SPECIFCALLY for 757-200s, no other model of the 757s used them, much less other aircraft.
@AlaskaFarewell cellphones didnt have cams in 2001? well not yours maybe, toys ' r us phones usually dont, i saw pics of crash site, the 'plane' bits could fit into a van, inc. one conveniently with the 'c' of american airlines neatly placed for photographers. Nope the engine in the pics looks a little bigger than the ones found in lego sets, copying and pasting from your shill guidelines wont scare me off im afraid, you could try some other sheep however! 9/11 WAS STILL AN INSIDE JOB!!!!!!!!!!
There were NO widely available phones with cameras in 2001, you are correct, the FIRST commercially available phone that did, the J-SH04, could only be found IN JAPAN in 2001, it didn't reach North American markets until 2002.
Among others, there is a picture of a disk hub that is 2 x 2 feet, matching dimensions of the disk hub found in Roll's Royce RB211 engine:
watch?v=YTNRkb7AaQk#t=1m20s
If you're not going to do the research, just go away, your ignorance has no excuse.
And a common trait of aircraft crashes into buildings, is that litte debris remains, if you're thinking huge sections of an aircraft should survive moving at 800 feet per second right into a limestone wall, you're an idiot.
But just to give you a chance to prove your point, please tell me how much you can find of the C-130 that crashed here:
So if 77 did not hit the pentagon, where is the plane and more importantly, where are the passengers? Or did the government dismantle the plane and kill the passengers in a remote hanger in area 57? Fukin loons
It would still be a missile anyway, moron. I could throw a bottle of coke at the Pentagon and I would be throwing a missile. You can even see the tail of the flipping plane at 0:25. That white blur is just the dust, but towards the top left of it is the tail.
Exactly. There were 59 innocent people died on that plane, including Ted and Barbara Olson (so we know the people on that plane were *real*, and not just names "made up" by shadowy secret service types!) What no conspiracy theorist has yet explained to me is where the passengers went, and how they were killed, if they didn't die in that plane crash.
Im sorry if I offend any of the deceased but this is just a thought:
How hard is it to let people on a plane & when it takes off to land it in a secluded area where they are forced to do audio & then later executed?
I know it sounds wrong but think of it like this. In the Boston Massacre, colonist attacked the british and the british defended themselves, BUT Paul Revere wrote that the british attacked without cause. He made it look like the colonist were victims. This made america the victim.
That is the dumbest thing I have ever heard. If they were going to go through the trouble of landing a plane, killing the passengers, then hiding the plane, then shooting the pentagon with a missile and *HOPE* nobody happens to be shooting video.. then why the fuck didn't they just crash the plane into the pentagon? And you think people are just going to sit there when they start killing people? They couldn't kill them all.
Wer an diesen Video glaubt es seien Moslems gewesen. Der ist Irre, macht die Augen auf es wird ein weiteres mal verbrechen gegen ganze Menschenheit ausgeübt.
OK, there's a white blip right before the explosion, could possibly be a small, light aircraft? but has anyone else noticed how in this video you can only watch it from beginning-to-end? You can't move the time indicator to whatever position you desire...why is that? Every other video I've seen on youtube allows you to do so...escueladeleyi, por el amor de D-os, que pretendes, wey?
The Pentagon was and still is a legitimate military target, unlike the WTC which was more a symbolic target in which there were many un-necessary deaths.
the pentagon.. is meant to be one of the most secure buildings in the world.... how come the only evidence they provide of a plane hitting, doesnt show a plane hitting. there are dozens and dozens of cameras which would have been recording at that time.... which would have captured something as big as the plane... hmmmm... what up with that
Rogueness2 - WTF? So now this conspiracy involves not only the government, the secret service and the military, but hundreds of *actors*? Actors who, presumably, don't want careers on stage and screen (careers they can't have, seeing as *officially* they're now relatives of Flight 77 victims, and not actors), and who are more than happy to go along with the greatest evil lie ever inflicted upon mankind. Please... Think this through properly. What you're saying makes no sense whatsoever.
Two people on American Airlines Flight 77 made phone calls to contacts on the ground. At 09:12, flight attendant Renee May called her mother, Nancy May, in Las Vegas. During the call, which lasted nearly two minutes, May said her flight was being hijacked by six individuals and they had been moved to the rear of the plane.May also asked her mother to contact American Airlines, which she and her husband promptly did.American Airlines was already aware of the hijacking.
Less than thirty-five minutes into the flight, the hijackers stormed the cockpit and forced the passengers to the rear of the aircraft. Hani Hanjour, one of the hijackers trained as a pilot, assumed control of the flight. Passengers aboard were able to make calls to loved ones and relay information on the hijacking.
American Airlines Flight 77 was a scheduled U.S. domestic flight from Washington Dulles International Airport, near Washington, D.C., to Los Angeles International Airport. It was hijacked by five individuals and deliberately crashed into the The Pentagon as part of the September 11, 2001 attacks
these cameras r on a time lapse so they only show every other second or two, but if you pause it a frame before the explosion, it looks too small to be an aircraft, possibly only 3 feet or so in diameter, looks more like a missile but can only speculate... defo needs more investigating
The plane does not fit into the hole. Do the measurements. ALL of the titanium should have been left. It melts at around 3,400 F. I wanna say I heard the fire burned at a "cool" 1900F. which burns the aluminum. If the wings were sheared off, where are they? They would not have melted, they would have been left out on the lawn, but the lawn was unscathed.
TheCaskOf43 1 month ago
teh bodies e-vaporize on impact. dna however persists, u just have to know exactly where to locate it. then easily identify body it/they was come from.
leechless1 1 month ago
tail of the plane or tail of the missile?
Amaking10000 1 month ago
I don't see any air plane debris...
Amaking10000 1 month ago
and finally at exactly 0:25 you can see the planes rear wing tip against the tree line, please look.
IIZODIIAC 1 month ago
No wing/engine marks on the building from the front view.. also no wings/engines on the lawn from this video. So they immediately evaporated on impact? hah The inside job isn't the conspiracy the fact that this is the only video released to the public is the conspiracy.. especially when we know there's at least 5 if not 80 clearer videos. I bet their having a good time eating popcorn while they watch the real videos in special Pentagon HD with NASA surround sound in their CIA I MAX theater
JGH8sDaDebunkerz 2 months ago
@JGH8sDaDebunkerz the wings would NOT have left a mark on the building they would NOT have stood up to the blast proofing of the pentagon which also explains why there was such a small hole left in the building.
IIZODIIAC 1 month ago
@IIZODIIAC OK so the 2 huge titanium engines vaporized as well and left no marks. The story is impossible no matter what debunking tactics you use. 8th grade physics vs A government that lies about everything and is still at war 10 years later. I don't want revenge on 19 patsies I want the troops to come home, the boarders to be protected, & America to be America again instead of NAZI Germany 2.0.
JGH8sDaDebunkerz 1 month ago
@JGH8sDaDebunkerz well if what these "truthers" believe is real that a cult is inside the government then America will never be straight.
IIZODIIAC 1 month ago
@JGH8sDaDebunkerz
Look at video "911 debunked American Flight 77" and see all the parts you claim are missing from the crash.
Blahblobify 1 month ago
@IIZODIIAC Uh, how are the wings NOT going to leave at least a "scratch" on the building, when the alleged plane made a GAPING hole?
TheCaskOf43 1 month ago
why arent any other videos released clearly showing the plane?
it would discredit truthers instantly
. the only thing that makes sense is its a cover up.
zenoist2 3 months ago
@zenoist2 there are no better videos, these are the best videos they had, all the others are pointless because the cameras recording were NOT high speed cameras which explains exactly why we didnt see the plane hit but a slow explosion.
IIZODIIAC 1 month ago
Nice airplane!
preppychrisbou 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
9/11 was an inside job for about 70 reasons, 1 reason alone can be considered coincidence, 2 is suspicious, 3 is inside job, 4 is a blatant inside job, but 70??? conspiracies happen, this was one of them, mass murder for personal gain! Oil, opium and bases in the middle east, better to take from the weak before other superpowers (russia, china) do! We may benefit in the long run when we fill up our cars, but it doesn't make 9.11 ok! Mass murder! the shills will attack me but i don't care!
wellifthemediasaysit 4 months ago
Pause the video at 25 and after 26 seconds and see the white smoke. I've not seen any white smoke with passenger planes taking off or landing. I have seen white smoke on cruise missile videos though. The frame skipping prevents us from seeng it and also lack of sound from hearing it. Surely there must be a better video with sound too.
benjyboba 4 months ago
This is so clearly a missile strike it's not funny. Pause it at :39 The aircraft was supposedly completely burned from intense fires, but seconds after impact, there is already nothing there. Including a fire!!! It was one burst of flames, then gone!!!
Check the photos of the impact hole. You will see a NO PARKING sign inches from the breach in the wall that shows no effects of any fire whatsoever. And anyone who watches this video closely and has any common sense can clearly see it's not a jet.
bartman5347 4 months ago
I'm not some super genius, but... pausing @ 0:25... that does NOT look like a Boeing 757 to me. O.o Those things are HUGE... whatever that is... doesn't seem very big at all. I don't know. Not the best footage obviously, but still...
DaftDreams 4 months ago
What I see at :25 is the smoke-stream of a missile. If that were really the tail of the plane, the rest would clearly be visible. It was supposed to be a jumbo jet, remember? The Pentagon was merely a way of steering away suspicion from the real facts of what took place on 9/11. But clearly, this is not a plane at all. .
bartman5347 4 months ago
@bartman5347 You say that it was supposed to be a Jumbo Jet? This is the first time that anyone ever said that it was a Jumbo Jet. American Airlines say that it was a Boeing 757, not a 747 which is the Jumbo Jet. The difference is that the 747 can carry over 416 passengers and has a 3 aisle cabin. The cabin width is 20.1 ft across. The wing span is 224 ft.7 in. and tail height is 63 ft.6 in. The 757 carries up to 228 passengers and has a single aisle cabin, The exterior cabin width cont
Hunterninja5 4 months ago
Respond to this video... is 12 ft. 4 in. The wing span is 124 ft (100 ft less than the 747). Both planes normal cruise speed is 573mph for most fuel efficiency. Both is 0.80 mach. If it would have been a 747 there would been more damage than this. Please pay respects to one of the victims of the the 911 Pentagon attacks, Melissa Rose Barnes at The Washington Post 911victims. All of the victims are listed.
Hunterninja5 4 months ago
Pause at 0:25, nuff said.
575rofl 4 months ago
to hit the pentagon, flight 77 wouldve done negative 38G's, impossible for an aircraft, impossible for the human body, not impossible for a missile
jetevovi 4 months ago
NEVER saw a plane
Davispa54 4 months ago
911 was a Mossad job.
search: 911missinglinks
donovan93123 4 months ago
@25 seconds you can actually see something resembling an aircraft immediately above the right most orange cone. It looks almost as if the aircraft has landed, but it would take an incredible feat of airmanship to keep that aircraft level at ground level and high speed.
weathergirlori 4 months ago
I agree with warmaker911, I was thinking the same exact thing, #1 how in the hell is a 757 that close to the ground unless from take off also I am sorry but it does look more like a missile then a plan
jmctimelord 4 months ago
Comment removed
koopz8up 4 months ago
Freeze the video at 24 and 25 seconds and you can see the tail of the plane sticking up above the rectangular post.
MillerMo10 4 months ago
Freeze the video at 24 and 25 seconds and you can see the tail of the plane sticking up above the rectangular post.
MillerMo10 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
/watch?v=j5FhQc-LJ-o
/watch?v=KhdppHwUJ9k
/watch?v=iGqjzFQvfdI
/watch?v=WxqoChniKVU
/watch?v=9QWvkAgyIY4
/watch?v=qFpbZ-aLDLY
/watch?v=HfmliaqIRBE
/watch?v=HSjDCwN2i3w
/watch?v=8XRMrMdn0NQ
/watch?v=zhnNy5EsebA
megamogx 4 months ago
No plane here must be the wrong video
Los1972 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Los1972 look closer on the right retard
CicconeTwins 4 months ago
any sensible person who knows nothing about the 'terrorist attacks' as propogated by the govt. would say that it was a MISSILE and not a commercial aircraft
warmaker911 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
At a Pentagon briefing the day after 9/11 Ed Plaugher (fire chief) who put out the fire at the Pentagon said there was only small pieces of the plane left but no large sections like fuselage engine and even seats. The Pentagon said that there were no identifiable pieces of plane left except for black box. There was no evidence but it waaass a plane and they say a fire melted and vaporized all identifiable pieces.
However they managed to fingerprint the bodies? Strange.
coronobog 5 months ago
There is No WAY in the WORLD a 747 737 733 766 hit this building HAAAAAAAAA I can't believe this shit Why would this be the only video they would release ? SMH We gotta do something about all these Lies then been telling us For Years it's getting way out of Hand .
recount09 5 months ago
FBI finished what they started in 1993. Do the research and the facts will blow your mind
mjwible27 6 months ago
im sick and fucking tired of all these idiots posting comments on how the government orchested all of this. it's an insult to all those innocent civilians who died in these attacks from AL-QAEDA, not the damn U.S. government. its amazing how many people believe in all of that bullshit. after this disaster, you couldn't by a goddamn american flag anywhere because they were sold out. now everyones' bitching because of the economy. you disgrace your country by believing in that nonsense.
dannyb13579 6 months ago
@dannyb13579 That's fine and all but when its A fact that our government created AL-QAEDA, Bush/Bin Laden Family did business together, The Blocking of FBI investigations into AL-QAEDA before 9/11, The VISA section blocking the terrorist from getting in the country then getting over ruled by CIA officials, Then training at US bases, Its not a surprise people aren't buying the official story,,, Then all the anomalies of Planes & Steel & Wreckage & Building Collapse, Seems like a scripted movie
JGH8sDaDebunkerz 6 months ago
@JGH8sDaDebunkerz first of all thanks for not being a douchebag or an idiot. and i see what your saying. im a bit skeptical too but until i find concrete proof that the goverment did it im believing what i saw.
dannyb13579 6 months ago
@dannyb13579 That's cool, I never knew the official story aside from some terrorist w box cutters Then 1 day 2 years ago I saw video of Building 7. I live 45 mins from where this building collapsed and never heard about it. I was addicted to studying 9/11 & the US governments shady ways after that. My opinion they definitely orchestrated it. Sadly like JFK we'll never know the truth.. Thanx 4 not being a dick too, Whose to say I'm a "twoofer" or your a "sheep" only high-up's know what went down
JGH8sDaDebunkerz 5 months ago
@JGH8sDaDebunkerz i actually just went to the pentagon memorial yesterday, and its pretty powerful shit. as i said before, until i find concrete evidence, im believing what i saw.
dannyb13579 5 months ago
you can definitly see a white trail and a little "fin" sticking up over the right hand corner of the pillar box........hard to tell , and hard to get round that a massive plane is hidding behind this box.....if "truthers" bother people so much then why not release more evidence and put this issue to bed
lonewolf2379 7 months ago
I used to love my country... i was a proud american. I now am so frustrated at our corrupt government and so mad that we would deliberately kill our own citizens in the name of greed. I am sad to be an american and I really do hate what we have become.
Postcarbonman 9 months ago
This is obviously not a fucking 757 if you think so you are an idiot and should be made sterile so as not to reproduce more retards... Looks like a missile to me FUCK THE GOVERNMENT AND THEIR EVIL TWISTED LIES!!!
deminted4ever 9 months ago
So fucking dumb, this isn't a plane. Tell us the truth now, fucking ZOG US GOVERNMENT SHITS. Killing innocent people, slaughtering iraqis who are innocent, murdering 3000 americans, the US government is evil.
AveEvropa 9 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Flight 77’s cockpit door never opened during flight. The Flight Data Recorder (FDR) begins recording the flight door status once the pilots are in their seats and readying for takeoff, and the plane cannot take off unless the FDR is working.
If the cockpit door never opened, how could the hijackers storm the cockpit and herd the pilots to the back of the plane? The data, which originated from the government, does not support the official story.
infoseeker264 10 months ago
this is bullshit a plane didnt hit the pentagon a flying missile hit it.
ELECTROWILDSTYLE 1 year ago
@ELECTROWILDSTYLE youre retarded
prove it
WKaliberr 1 year ago
hehe good point. i think i was the first who stole this vid on air control site and uploaded on MySpace. spread and share :)
mojojojotownsville 1 year ago
I think it was a missle. Because if A Plane hit it the "hole" would not have been shaped the way it was. So I can only think a missle or something
JohnMorrisonFan22 1 year ago
@JohnMorrisonFan22 yea exactly. some people are too stupid to realize that lol
BearyPwetty 1 year ago
do you know how big a 757 would be in this pic? lol its laughable that people believe this
candiceevans1 1 year ago
@candiceevans1
Wrong, the object was measured to be over 140 feet in length:
/watch?v=iBHi9CbrNf4#t=48
You either fail math, or lack depth perception.
AlaskaFarewell 1 year ago
0:26 does that look like a plane to you?
itsthatsebguy93 1 year ago
@itsthatsebguy93
Doesn't have to, it's over 140 feet long, pretty much the only things that size that can fly are Jets.
AlaskaFarewell 1 year ago
@AlaskaFarewell a 757 is 155 ft 3 in does what you see in the video look 155 ft 3 in? i mean yeah its white like a plane and it appears to have a tail on it but American airlines paint their planes red while blue and silver and the "plane" in the video is white and appears smaller than a 757 all i'm saying is don't you think thats a bit odd?
itsthatsebguy93 1 year ago
@itsthatsebguy93
The object in the video is over 140 feet, even if you don't wish to say it was as Flight 77, your chocies for what it could be are quite limited, and nearly all end and start with either airliners, or cargo jets.
We know however that is flight 77 for more than couple reason, we have expert witnesses from the scene including a C-130 pilot whom was flying and tracked and nearly RAN INTO the plane.
We have American Airline lingerie everywhere, an FDR saying it's from 77.
AlaskaFarewell 1 year ago
@AlaskaFarewell finally a voice of reason among conspiracy loons and Alex Jones dickriders
WKaliberr 1 year ago
@WKaliberr Hey Dude... Pray for someday Alex Jones theories DO NOT come to light....
IntelArt 11 months ago
@IntelArt They're already coming true, Lady arrested for home schooling, 10 FEMA governors/camps, Lady arrested for growing a garden, people arrested for silence dancing at the Jefferson Memorial, Poisoning of the food & water & vaccinations, Illegal wars, A police chief firing the towns Mayor for exposing corruption and holding secret meeting, Soldiers doing check points in America, TSA groping people now expanding to supermarkets/proms/train stations, surveillance grids, Genetic engineering...
JGH8sDaDebunkerz 6 months ago
@itsthatsebguy93
The plane appearing smaller can be contributed to the distortion of the camera that taped it, as well as the angle it was filming it at, which wasn't completely perpendicular.
There's nothing strange here, only people coming off the street trying to make assertions of something that is beyond their know-how to determine, and coming to erroneous conclusions.
People have done it over the moon landing, the Titanic sinking, so this is nothing new, and nothing relevant.
AlaskaFarewell 1 year ago
your so blind the moon landings were filmed in some dudes garage and Titanic never existed its all a plot so the snakeheads can put aids in our cola so we vote republican!!!
i am just kidding btw but i will admit i have no idea what I'm talking about and i don't even care weather or not 9/11 was an inside job or not i don't even live in the US, i was wondering how many thumbs up i could get with a sweeping statement and then i felt i had to defend the opinion that i had expressed, sorry...
itsthatsebguy93 1 year ago
...for wasting your time and what not i'd rather be honest and come clean rather than argue a point i don't even hold.
itsthatsebguy93 1 year ago
@itsthatsebguy93
Then I'll implore you to not make light of 3,000 deaths, likely including people from wherever you're from.
AlaskaFarewell 1 year ago
If the entire plane fit in the viewing area (159 ft.), the camera was at 4 frames per second, there was 30 feet of the nose of the plane exposed at frame #1 (per object in video entering the frame), and the speed was 300 mph, we would be able to see 88% of the plane in frame #2, and 57% of the plane in frame #3. To not see the plane at all under these assumptions the plane would have had to be traveling at 435 mph, which is highly unlikely.... There was no plane......
super0spaz 1 year ago
@super0spaz
The plane could have been flying at 435 mph, there's no obstacle to that, the engines had that power, and Boeing designs its aircraft with a 50% saftey margin, which they don't even have to demonstrate anymore thanks to the re-written FARs on the subject.
And we get ALL of the plane in the first frame, minus what the light post was hiding, here it is highlighted:
/watch?v=iBHi9CbrNf4
Your data will always be flawed, if you aren't aware what the true factors involved are.
AlaskaFarewell 1 year ago
검색 : 무료 bilderberg 필름 (SEARCH: free bilderberg films)
infowars.com
OutofMudProductions 1 year ago
The pilot couldn't do it, "The speed, the maneuverability, the way that he turned, we all thought in the radar room, all of us experienced air traffic controllers, that that was a military plane" Why did Flight 77 make a complicated 330-degree turn around the Pentagon, before hitting it in an area that had recently been reinforced? They could of flew straight down and killed Rumsfeld, whose office was on the other side of the building. They wont release the videos its too shady its a cover up.
JGH8sDaDebunkerz 1 year ago
@JGH8sDaDebunkerz
A 330 degree turn isn't complicated, his bank angle was 32 to 45 degrees, right around standard.
Not hard, this is a fact.
AlaskaFarewell 1 year ago
@JGH8sDaDebunkerz
Also, that isn't their quote, you fail. Those are dulles controllers, they RARELY ever see military aircraft on their scopes, and when they have something moving at over 400 mph, and flying on paths airliners don't normally travel, what are they supposed to think?
They, however, don't deny it was flight 77, so that's fail 2.
AlaskaFarewell 1 year ago
@AlaskaFarewell Are you the type that takes witness accounts from the pentagon as 100% fact, but don't listen to the people who reported bombs and explosions going off all over the building and in the basements of the wtc
JGH8sDaDebunkerz 1 year ago
@JGH8sDaDebunkerz
1. No I' am not, there is a REASON eye witness testimony is so low on the lsit of evidence in court cases in the matter of weight.
In minor ways, the testimonies Contradict each other, how was the Plane flying? Where exactly did it come from?
And this is to be expected, a faked story, fake testimony, would have no variations, a true one would
A vast majority however agree on the important details, did the plane crash? Yes, was it an Airliner? Yes.
AlaskaFarewell 1 year ago
@JGH8sDaDebunkerz
As to the "explosions", I've heard of people whom thought the sound of glass breaking was a GUNSHOT.
Most of the witnesses aren't people privy to combat zones, do they know, truly, what en explosive going off is? No, and were there OTHER things exploding that day? Absolutely,
There are benign, domestic explanations for the explosions, which have nothing to do with explosives, you should look them up.
AlaskaFarewell 1 year ago
@AlaskaFarewell A lot were from cops & firemen There's a video of an explosion The lobby was blown to shit and people got blown up in the basements. The buildings came down at near free fall. all those steel columns were gone in secs which weren't even close to the fire, 90,000 tons of concrete turned into a fine dust, thermite in the dust, molten metal days after, over 100 first responders heard explosions If you match what they heard compared to all the evidence of what happen its no question
JGH8sDaDebunkerz 1 year ago
@JGH8sDaDebunkerz
Yeah, and the cops and firemen that were there all deny that there were actual bombs, including a certian firechief.
I actually recall those who arrived first in the lobby of the WTC where the supposed "explosions" occur, and they STATED what it was.
But enough of this, want to talk about the Towers? Take it to a Tower video, or PM me, we will not deviate from the Pentagon attack here.
AlaskaFarewell 1 year ago
Alaskafarewell I dont claim to know it all, it was a terrible day, I got out of my college class at 850 that mourn, went to skyline drive n watched it all go down in NYC, terrible day, my friend dan's mother worked in north tower, but i enjoy investigating it. I looked up the engines, some sites are saying 737 engine, others are saying 757, other military. Im not a pilot but from pilot testimonies they say it was some intense steering that 20 yr vets would have trouble pulling off.
JGH8sDaDebunkerz 1 year ago 9
@JGH8sDaDebunkerz
It doesn't matter what "some sites say", I gave you a diagram MATCHING the parts, a 737 does not use the RB211s, they were SPECIFICALLY made for the Boeing 747, 757 and 767, those are your only choices.
As to "20 year vets", I can do you one way better, say hello to the Allied Pilots Association, the UNION for 20,000 American Airline pilots whom fly these planes FOR A LIVING, their members have put this to the test, and they have found the only obstacle being an ALARM.
AlaskaFarewell 1 year ago
I understand fully what the aircraft pulled off in flight.
The aircraft was under AUTOPILOT for all but 8 minutes, and then for 5 minutes of that the guy flew straight and level.
It is only 3 minutes here that matter, and even then, nothing difficult was pulled off, the ONLY thing you could say was that he got lucky that the lamp posts didn't cause him to crash pre-maturely, and that does not take skill, NO amount of skill would save you from a pole dissecting the plane, it is purely luck.
AlaskaFarewell 1 year ago
@JGH8sDaDebunkerz putting off what? 20 yr vets would have trouble pulling off.
LucaTurilli89 6 months ago
@LucaTurilli89 Hijacking and Maneuvering an aircraft of that size at those speeds flying a foot off the ground hitting light poles without touching the ground going through three rings of the pentagon leaving little to no wreckage and a perfect punch out hole when its been reported he couldn't even fly a small one engine Cessna.. some pilots would say that's an impossible feat
JGH8sDaDebunkerz 6 months ago
None of these links work, and I went to the website when I click on to read it takes me to pages that say its no long exist. Look you can believe what you want I wasn't even talking to you. Just stating what i think happened. The pentagon doesn't add up no matter how many shitty websites you send me to but i tried. I saw the 2 cops interviewed that disagree with the flight path, other people will go along with the government to save their job. You weren't there so you'll never kno
JGH8sDaDebunkerz 1 year ago
@JGH8sDaDebunkerz
Links updated. Thanks for the notification.
iyeniko 1 year ago
@JGH8sDaDebunkerz
"doesn't add up"? Whatever, the flight path is irrelevent, since 104 people saw it COLLIDE with the Pentagon's facade, from what exact angle it orginally came from is a fine detail at best, in no way does it change those people's testimonies.
The Pentagon's situation DOES add up, stating otherwise only means you're not familiar enough with it.
Hell, the only case 9/11 "scholars" can make about the Pentagon attack is the flight path, if that's all, we're done here.
AlaskaFarewell 1 year ago
@AlaskaFarewell No the flight path means something when huge light poles are knocked down all over the place and a bunch of witnesses including 2 police who work at the pentagon say the plane wasn't anywhere near them.
JGH8sDaDebunkerz 1 year ago
@JGH8sDaDebunkerz
And a few people couldn't be mistaken?
There are varying accounts of what happened to the Titanic while it sank, some thought it raised out of the water, some said it broke before that.
The film went with the former, but the actual evidence supports the latter.
No, what you should be paying attention to is this:
1. No one claims to have seen a plane pull away.
2. Of the 104 people close enough to the site, all said the plane impacted.
That's what matters.
AlaskaFarewell 1 year ago
@AlaskaFarewell I saw the interview with the guy who was in the building, ran outside after the hit and saw a plane leaving the scene it was awhile ago but ill look for it and send you the link
JGH8sDaDebunkerz 1 year ago
@JGH8sDaDebunkerz
He might have seen the C-130, not a plane pulling out of a dive.
AlaskaFarewell 1 year ago
I was saying its impossible for an inexperienced pilot to pull off the turn, hit light poles, and fly a few feet off the ground at 400 mph with out hitting the ground. Hanji hanjour had a COMMERCIAL LICENSE when he got here, HIS flight instructor said he was a terrible pilot. Michael Springmann of the visa section didn't want to give the terrorist visa's but C.I.A. officers repeatedly overruled him and ordered the visas to be issued. These guys were let in the country the whole thing was a setup
JGH8sDaDebunkerz 1 year ago 7
@JGH8sDaDebunkerz
The turn was 330 degrees,meaning it had an angle of about 30 degrees, the bank angle was only 32 to 45 degrees, which is only SLIGHTLY above standard.
And you think that's hard? Then YOU do not fly, and certiantly doesn't help your case that Hani Hanjour, who had a commercial license would have practiced such turns ENDESSLY, the fact that the turn rate wasn't held steady is a GIVE AWAY the pilot behind the controls was lacking polish.
AlaskaFarewell 1 year ago
@JGH8sDaDebunkerz
And stop talking about the "terrible flying" comments, if you didn't know the turn itself was benign thing to do, then it's obvious you also don't know what FAA standards are.
Let me clue you in, they are kept VERY high, and just because you fail them, it does NOT mean you can't fly a plane, it only means you likely can't fly a plane SAFE enough to meat their standards.
And since there was NOTHING safe about what Hanjour did, this point is moot, and done with.
AlaskaFarewell 1 year ago
3 QUESTIONS 911 TRUTHERS DON'T WANT YOU TO ASK THEM:
How many of Architects & Engineers for 911 Truth's 1400+ architectural and engineering professionals have experience in structural engineering, high rise construction, or controlled demolition?
What did Hani Hanjour’s flight instructors have to say about his flying ability?
Who was Ali Mohamed and what is his relationship with Osama Bin Laden and the CIA?
ctcole77 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@ctcole77 IS A TROLL DON'T WASTE YOUR BREATH OR TYPING ON THIS VERY SPECIAL TROLL, IT IS A CREATION OF THE CIA. RESPOND AND IT WILL COME BACK WITH 3 RANDOM DEBUNKED 9/11 QUESTIONS HAHA BUT FOR FUN YOU CAN RESPOND TO IT AND DEBUNK THE QUESTIONS. THEN NASA SCIENTIST WILL HAVE TO COME IN AND UPDATE THE PROGRAM, WASTING THEIR TIME. NOTE- THIS WILL RESULT IN THE WASTING OF TAX DOLLARS
JGH8sDaDebunkerz 5 months ago
@JGH8sDaDebunkerz wtf where the hell did you get the information that the CIA allowed the terrorists visas? Stupid conspiracy theorists love creating their own stories, and it's funny how their are so much different versions of 9/11 conspiracists. If you were right then there would only be one story with a shit load of proof. SMH
TheMentoesGuy 4 months ago
@TheMentoesGuy Not everyones crazy as shit just making things up like space beams and invisible planes. hah look up Mike Springman. He was US consulate and a foreign service official. I'm just stating facts from his interviews. Springman went public (after internal efforts failed) to expose the State Dept/CIA conduiting terrorists into the US. The same thing happend with Canadian Officials, they were flagged the state department makes a call and they were let in. Look it up it was in the news
JGH8sDaDebunkerz 4 months ago
Nobody said they saw the plane hit the building! They saw a plane in the area, there was a Cargo Plane ordered to check out the area & the doomsday plane. This was a small military guided plane with a missile. No shitty Cessna pilot can hijack a Boeing 757 with a box cutter, find the pentagon, fly it impossible speeds low to the ground, leave a hole smaller than the plane,a punch out hole threw 3 rings & leave no trace of a plane, except for a tiny engine that doesn't fit the plane. Come on!
JGH8sDaDebunkerz 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@JGH8sDaDebunkerz
"Nobody said they saw the plane hit the building!"
Wrong, 104 people said they did:
sites(.)google(.)com/site/wtc7lies/911pentagonflight77evidencesummary
Including Alan Wallace, the firefighter whom had to deck out of the way, the C-130 pilot, and THIS guy, only a few yds away:
/watch?v=YVDdjLQkUV8#t-3m44s
If you're not even going to bother to look this up, then also don't bother commenting, your ignorance has no excuse.
AlaskaFarewell 1 year ago
@JGH8sDaDebunkerz
"Nobody said they saw the plane hit the building!"
Wrong, 104 people saw it, including 6, like firefighter Alan Wallace, whom had to duck out of the way, the C-130 Pilot, and THIS guy, only a few yds away:
/watch?v=YVDdjLQkUV8#t=3m48s
Hanji hanjour had a COMMERCIAL LICENSE, he KNEW how to fly planes like those.
Impossible speeds? No, 400+ mph is not impossible, it's well within the engine's output.
If you're not bothering to do the reasearch, stop talking.
AlaskaFarewell 1 year ago
They found a tiny engine, your saying that's from a Boeing? The engine rotor, if the evidence was not planted, is consistent with a small jet aircraft such as the Navy S-3B, the F-15, the F-16 or the F-18; definitely not from a Boeing 757-223.One witness that reported seeing a 8-10 seat passenger plane, others reported a small rear-engined jet, which would be consistent with the Navy T-39 Sabreliner.Look at this damn video! Your the crazy conspiracy theorist if you believe the government
JGH8sDaDebunkerz 1 year ago
@JGH8sDaDebunkerz
The engine rotor came from a RB211 engine, It was MATCHED to that:
aerospaceweb(.)org/question/conspiracy/pentagon/rb211-pentagon(.)jpg
That is TOO LARGE for an F-15, F-16, or whatever the hell else you want to list.
And one witness, vs 37 CONFIRMING it was an airliner, 7 WERE PILOTS, 1 was ATC,
AND THIS GUY, A C-130 Pilot IN FLIGHT that day, whom nearly RAN INTO IT with his plane, and watched it crash into the pentagon:
/watch?v=Q9ag6brfWro&NR=1#t=37s
AlaskaFarewell 1 year ago
Oh, one more thing, this?:
(.)msm(.)cam(.)ac(.)uk/phase-trans/mphil/Trent1/sld024(.)htm
This isn't some "shill guideline", this is the Rolls Royce WEBSITE, this is THEM saying what makes up their engine.
And you haven't read it? Well then you admit you don't know what's in their engines, as I doubt you're the type who found this diagram off-line.
Fail.
AlaskaFarewell 1 year ago
0:26 What the hell is that thing? Is that seriously the plane? It looks way too small.
17589 1 year ago
Aqui está claro que es un misil de tierra tierra, osea que lo lanzarón desde tierra, lo que yo me pregunto es ¿ donde está el avión que dicen que se estrello aquí?
ruymxsx7 1 year ago
it looked like a missle
SaintsRowMaster12345 1 year ago
@SaintsRowMaster12345
It was over 140 feet in length, there is no missile that size, only aircraft.
AlaskaFarewell 1 year ago
Legitimate military target.
zionic144nz 1 year ago
Well one reason might be that the plane is moving so fast(400 kts give or take) AND the cops' back is to the plane. And just exactly who is going to call him on the radio? Air traffic control? NORAD? Maybe the US Govt. telling him to keep his head facing forward! "CAR 54, CAR 54, DO NOT LOOK TO YOUR RIGHT, OVER. If you very closely in the last frame before the plane hits the building, you can see it's vertical stabilizer above the ticket dispensor.
195er 1 year ago
there was a guy there.. 15 seconds before it hit.. how didnt he see a plane coming down.. and he was the police.. why didnt he get a report of a plane on his radio.
rocket much?
benNEHHHh 2 years ago
did you bootleg this fro wikipedia?
1DanielChristensen 2 years ago
....and it remains a legitimate military target.
zionic144nz 2 years ago
I Knew about 9/11 but didnt know about this./
xxxMostEnviedGurlxxx 2 years ago
i'd like to dedicate my new video to the memory of lisa beamers husband, who died valiantly crashing flight 93 into a hole which was already there, may he rest in pieces, where ever they may be.
EarthsGravitySucks 2 years ago
Dude, if you had government agent walk into your house and say, "If you dont do as we say, we will kill your entire family and you" would you give a rats as about being a hero?
As for the plane who knows? -_- And hows this for a reason.
The boston massacre was true but distorted to make it seem like the people were innocent and the british evil. Im saying that when the planes hit, that our gov't planted explosives to make sure the towers fell. Is that hard to believe?
Ibadboy15I 2 years ago
yes it is hard to belive
RainyDayBlue8 2 years ago
If 9/11 was a conspiracy, that means the government killed 2 thousand of their own. What I laugh at is if they can kill 2000, why couldn't they kill only a few more people who are trying to convince everyone it was? The Pentagon is the only one I don't understand.
TJS678 2 years ago
well if you dont understand the pentagon just like i dont then why would we expect anything different from the other incidents??. do you see a plane in this video? because i dont see one at all!! i see smoke just like if a missle was shot it would have a trail of smoke behind it. im not saying what i think and making any speculations but i know what i see.
getyoasshome 2 years ago
And where are the videos or eyewitness accounts of people dragging pieces of a plane and jet engines onto the lawn of the pentagon?
lokilokd 2 years ago
dont know but i do know that a plane didnt hit that son of a bitch.
getyoasshome 2 years ago
@getyoasshome
Then safe to say, you're wrong.
AlaskaFarewell 1 year ago
so i guess you have the answers.......yeah right.
getyoasshome 1 year ago
@getyoasshome
More then enough to answer whatever you're spewing, as when you were a frequent visitor of the Pentagon for 6 years, it comes with the territory.
And far more often then not, truther theories come down to them not knowing what's at the Pentagon, becaue they've never even bothered to visit the site.
AlaskaFarewell 1 year ago
you visiting the pentagon doesnt mean that a plane hit because you said so.....lookin at the video you dont see a plane so get over your visits.
getyoasshome 1 year ago
@getyoasshome
No, 103 people saying a plane hit the building mean there's a plane, the finding of the CVR and matching the serial number to the one used by N644AA means there was a plane, an APU door, landing gear, and cockpit parts from a 757-200 means there was a plane, the bodies and their identities confirmed via DNA means there was a plane, and debris like this:
/watch?v=F-bBryqjNEw#t=21s
Means it was an American Airline plane.
AlaskaFarewell 1 year ago
@AlaskaFarewell no there was no plane, not a passenger one anyway, dna can be made up as easily as dental records can be switched. Plane parts from a small military jet cannot also be from a passenger jet. Also vaporise means 'turns into vapor'. Titanium engines dont do that. 100's of ppl we never see or hear about who never botheredto pick up a camera and film what they see? even with a cellphone? nope no plane, it simply didnt happen
donutmoron 1 year ago
@donutmoron
Yes, it was a passenger plane, the parts recovered from the wreck support that.
There were no parts from a "small military plane", the engine parts were from a Rolls Royce engine used SPECIFICALLY by 757-200s, and the same engines Flight 77 was using.
The same to the landing gear hub caps, SPECIFCALLY for 757-200s, no other model of the 757s used them, much less other aircraft.
The engines, less than 10% titanium:
msm(.)cam(.)ac(.)uk/phase-trans/mphil/Trent1/sld024(.)htm
AlaskaFarewell 1 year ago
@donutmoron
No one filmed the crash, but people did film the crash site, and only minutes after it occurred, you're arguement fails.
And cellphones didn't have cameras back then, how about you leave this arguement to people whom are old enough to remember that?
AlaskaFarewell 1 year ago
@AlaskaFarewell cellphones didnt have cams in 2001? well not yours maybe, toys ' r us phones usually dont, i saw pics of crash site, the 'plane' bits could fit into a van, inc. one conveniently with the 'c' of american airlines neatly placed for photographers. Nope the engine in the pics looks a little bigger than the ones found in lego sets, copying and pasting from your shill guidelines wont scare me off im afraid, you could try some other sheep however! 9/11 WAS STILL AN INSIDE JOB!!!!!!!!!!
donutmoron 1 year ago
@donutmoro
There were NO widely available phones with cameras in 2001, you are correct, the FIRST commercially available phone that did, the J-SH04, could only be found IN JAPAN in 2001, it didn't reach North American markets until 2002.
Among others, there is a picture of a disk hub that is 2 x 2 feet, matching dimensions of the disk hub found in Roll's Royce RB211 engine:
watch?v=YTNRkb7AaQk#t=1m20s
If you're not going to do the research, just go away, your ignorance has no excuse.
AlaskaFarewell 1 year ago
And a common trait of aircraft crashes into buildings, is that litte debris remains, if you're thinking huge sections of an aircraft should survive moving at 800 feet per second right into a limestone wall, you're an idiot.
But just to give you a chance to prove your point, please tell me how much you can find of the C-130 that crashed here:
911research(.)wtc7(.)net/pentagon/analysis/compare/c130crash(.)html
It was flying less than half the speed of AA-77, so tell me, what do you see?
AlaskaFarewell 1 year ago
So if 77 did not hit the pentagon, where is the plane and more importantly, where are the passengers? Or did the government dismantle the plane and kill the passengers in a remote hanger in area 57? Fukin loons
lokilokd 2 years ago
witness protection program????
getyoasshome 2 years ago
looks like a plane to me crackheads.
ptraiders40 2 years ago
yeah right lol lol lol lol
getyoasshome 2 years ago
if thats a plane at 0:25 then were is the nose of the plane
kyhuntter 2 years ago
right in front of the rest of the plane.
Gamezero05 2 years ago
How's a supposedly fixed-mount damaged turbine going to generate a corkscrew-shaped trail? Makes no sense.
You get a corkscrew trail with guided missiles, however, because it's an effect of the attitude servos re-vectoring the engine thrust.
CACBCCCU 2 years ago
you can see the plane at 0:25
RingsideFans 2 years ago
That's a nice missile, now where is the plane?
bofors7715 2 years ago
It would still be a missile anyway, moron. I could throw a bottle of coke at the Pentagon and I would be throwing a missile. You can even see the tail of the flipping plane at 0:25. That white blur is just the dust, but towards the top left of it is the tail.
J3yeJ3ye 2 years ago
if flight 77 didn't crash into the pentagon let me know where it did crash
yooitsbrian 2 years ago
Exactly. There were 59 innocent people died on that plane, including Ted and Barbara Olson (so we know the people on that plane were *real*, and not just names "made up" by shadowy secret service types!) What no conspiracy theorist has yet explained to me is where the passengers went, and how they were killed, if they didn't die in that plane crash.
tidalwave1978 2 years ago
Im sorry if I offend any of the deceased but this is just a thought:
How hard is it to let people on a plane & when it takes off to land it in a secluded area where they are forced to do audio & then later executed?
I know it sounds wrong but think of it like this. In the Boston Massacre, colonist attacked the british and the british defended themselves, BUT Paul Revere wrote that the british attacked without cause. He made it look like the colonist were victims. This made america the victim.
Ibadboy15I 2 years ago
That is the dumbest thing I have ever heard. If they were going to go through the trouble of landing a plane, killing the passengers, then hiding the plane, then shooting the pentagon with a missile and *HOPE* nobody happens to be shooting video.. then why the fuck didn't they just crash the plane into the pentagon? And you think people are just going to sit there when they start killing people? They couldn't kill them all.
Gamezero05 2 years ago
Wer an diesen Video glaubt es seien Moslems gewesen. Der ist Irre, macht die Augen auf es wird ein weiteres mal verbrechen gegen ganze Menschenheit ausgeübt.
z2000afer 2 years ago
"The Pentagon was and still is a legitimate military target"
Then so is Tehran, and that scummy little cesspool of wogs on the West bank.
Nuke the fuckers now and get it over with. It also would clean some of the scum out of the gene pool.
Bulldog7046 3 years ago
OK, there's a white blip right before the explosion, could possibly be a small, light aircraft? but has anyone else noticed how in this video you can only watch it from beginning-to-end? You can't move the time indicator to whatever position you desire...why is that? Every other video I've seen on youtube allows you to do so...escueladeleyi, por el amor de D-os, que pretendes, wey?
mattrocks1978 3 years ago
the goverment has taken over youtube!!!!!!!!!RUN!!!!!!
najeealabbasi 3 years ago
looked like it was metallic and hovering a couple feet off the ground, from right to left... right? not the best video quality
4orty5ive 3 years ago
What really happened to Flight 77? because that obviously wasnt a plane.
zionic144nz 3 years ago
The Pentagon was and still is a legitimate military target, unlike the WTC which was more a symbolic target in which there were many un-necessary deaths.
zionic144nz 3 years ago
the pentagon.. is meant to be one of the most secure buildings in the world.... how come the only evidence they provide of a plane hitting, doesnt show a plane hitting. there are dozens and dozens of cameras which would have been recording at that time.... which would have captured something as big as the plane... hmmmm... what up with that
lightman514 3 years ago
yeah yeah "THEY" shot a secret missile so that "THEY" could take over the world.
I hate "THEM" because "THEY" are always doing stuff like that.
MondoMedia7 3 years ago
the families of the dead passengers will be so pleased to hear this!
escueladeleyi 3 years ago
show me this "family of one of the dead passengers" and ill show you an actor
rogueness2 3 years ago
"show me this "family of one of the dead passengers" and ill show you an actor"
Just show up at the memorial ceremony every Sept 11th at the Pentagon. There are hundreds attending every year.
Tell 'em what you think, and see how long it takes them to turn some teenage zit-picking faggot into a spot of goo on the pavement.
Like you have the balls to actually show up.
Bulldog7046 3 years ago
Rogueness2 - WTF? So now this conspiracy involves not only the government, the secret service and the military, but hundreds of *actors*? Actors who, presumably, don't want careers on stage and screen (careers they can't have, seeing as *officially* they're now relatives of Flight 77 victims, and not actors), and who are more than happy to go along with the greatest evil lie ever inflicted upon mankind. Please... Think this through properly. What you're saying makes no sense whatsoever.
tidalwave1978 2 years ago
Two people on American Airlines Flight 77 made phone calls to contacts on the ground. At 09:12, flight attendant Renee May called her mother, Nancy May, in Las Vegas. During the call, which lasted nearly two minutes, May said her flight was being hijacked by six individuals and they had been moved to the rear of the plane.May also asked her mother to contact American Airlines, which she and her husband promptly did.American Airlines was already aware of the hijacking.
escueladeleyi 3 years ago
Less than thirty-five minutes into the flight, the hijackers stormed the cockpit and forced the passengers to the rear of the aircraft. Hani Hanjour, one of the hijackers trained as a pilot, assumed control of the flight. Passengers aboard were able to make calls to loved ones and relay information on the hijacking.
escueladeleyi 3 years ago
American Airlines Flight 77 was a scheduled U.S. domestic flight from Washington Dulles International Airport, near Washington, D.C., to Los Angeles International Airport. It was hijacked by five individuals and deliberately crashed into the The Pentagon as part of the September 11, 2001 attacks
escueladeleyi 3 years ago
in whos dreams mine or yours
najeealabbasi 3 years ago
bullshit!
escueladeleyi 3 years ago
WHERE are all the people that was on FLIGHT 77 then????????????????
Answer me that and back your answer up with PROOF!
I dare ya!
dobermans4you2 3 years ago
no offense, but what are you on about. i think the proof needs to come the other way.. if a plane hit the pentagon, where is it???????
lightman514 3 years ago
So where was the plane??? That looks like a bomb explosion
JRock005 3 years ago 3
at 00:24 watch the right side of the video
If you look very close you can see the plane sliding towards the building
degrotepeter 3 years ago
@JRock005
Watch 0:24 on the right, it looks like a plane
rocaw 1 year ago
@JRock005 it doesn't even fit the destruction hole
FanONerf 1 year ago
these cameras r on a time lapse so they only show every other second or two, but if you pause it a frame before the explosion, it looks too small to be an aircraft, possibly only 3 feet or so in diameter, looks more like a missile but can only speculate... defo needs more investigating
dftel 3 years ago
Yes, it does not look like a 40 foot tall plane does it?
IsThisFreeAmerica 3 years ago
so what happened to flight 77
Choungui 3 years ago
it crashed on that island that Dharma used to control. when Desmond didnt enter the numbers in time , that caused the plane to crash!!!!lol
zionic144nz 3 years ago
LOOK HOW SMALL That plne or missle is!!!!Not a commercial flight if you think it is a commercial fli