When most of our food comes from Urban or Vertical Farming, we could give back much of the farm land back to nature to conquer, we would have full excess to fresh locally grown fruits.
TAXES that's the ONLY issue in the way let's all get together and go meet with the mayor of new York, Chicago, or las Vegas and ask for a law that simply says that any vertical farms in the future could opereate without property taxes there would probably be issues with regular farmers being ticked off but they get huge tax breaks anyway this is a way to make investors say o well this could grow and build more and more on my investment this is just like any other company and could be very profi
@PaulCarnage Very true, i often hear people bring up the "loss of farming jobs" as a monetary concern. They don't realize that a monetary system actually creates most of the necessity to sell labor. A farmer may lose his job, but would gain a world without food and water scarcity
no science! nothing to back it up... poor columbia university being associated with this guy! and his plans will never feed the poor: the poor and the hungry will be fed through small scale sustainable agriculture in which they are the owners of their production. hunger is created through enclosure, and the dependence/poverty which follows.
@aclinard Neither in the talk nor in his book he claims it's proven science and ready to go: He wants to raise interrest in the topic so some vertical farm prototypes get built and research is done.
He speaks of some school project "vertical farm" and also about "the genomes" of coming generations that he wishes to look into this idea - because 1 thing is clear (for this you'll find a broad scientific consensus): the way agriculture works today won't feed the people of tomorrow in a sust. way!
Here is a great example how people get excited and work on ideas that will improve everyones lifes without any money incentive. Check out the Zeitgeist movement, and lets finally make this reality - feed the whole wide world!
@MokomaSusi That's not the idea. :) The idea is to do not stop the tecnical progress only because "everyone has to make money for a living". It's gonna happen anyway, only painful way. Just look at what's going on today: soon there will be tremendous numbers of unemployed people. Here's one hillarious article on the subject. Hillarious, but it's no joke...
"soon there will be tremendous numbers of unemployed people. "
Yeah, but that robot revolution wont start anytime soon. Then there is that most important factor: "Idle Hands Are The Devil's Tools" like the saying goes.
Judge Dredd comics give good impression what "Zeitgeist future" would look like.
"Zeitgeists idea = build robots to do work humans do now" i think that is a serious oversimplification. Even if you don't agree with the conclusions reached by groups like the Zeitgeist Movement, Technocracy or the Venus Project, the concept of using the scientific method to arrive at the best conclusions possible is an idea worth exploring. Just consider that the Declaration of Independence and The Wealth of Nations (1776) were written almost 100 years before Darwin
@curingaging00 automation moves forward whether we like it or not. This has been happening for decades in our current system. Difference is in this system people become unemployed. In a resource based economy using automation means more freedom. Google " Foxconn to replace workers with 1 million robots in 3 years " stories like this one will continue to happen in order for companies to compete. It seems unemployment will continue to rise. It's already happening in this system.
@efortune357 Hmm thanks for bringing this into my attention, I do however believe that in the far future, we would still play a large part in technological advancements.
I'd like except I'd say simplify it, make it cheaper and scale it down to start. What if we could build smaller versions in our backyards, vacant houses, and apartments. There are some really good videos on Youtube that show how almost anyone can grow food indoor and outdoors using hydroponics and aeroponics: watch?v=dz6m5370RB0 watch?v=3xUK6A9Bwvk&feature=related and especially watch?v=HMrjQScAQFY
@IAmJasonThomas yes, i agree these small scale hydroponics are much more realistic than vertical farming. I think I might try it out. They do use a lot of electric power however. After fukushima, with growing resistance to nuclear power and increasingly expensive fossil fuels, I'm starting to wonder what the effect of extremely expensive energy will be on the world 100 years from now. maybe we will all move back to the farm.
information we don`t produce anything, I mean we do produce but just a small bit of what we need. I do believe that the success of this kind of project there going to find a lot of people ready to learn and apply some sustainable methods of farming. And this I think is a pretty difficult thing to do.
The small scale farming is a good idea and I think I what we should start doing. But my point of view is that more people should be involved in growing the food and of course they need to know what they are doing (I mean to be passionate about their job). USA have now only 3-4% of people engaged in food production, and for a sustainable farming to occur I think you need at least 20% of well informed farmers. Here in Romania we have 50% of people living in country side, but without the proper
This gives me hope, and that's something we all need right now
Alexfantastico26 6 days ago
would this be cost effective?
jcng5 1 month ago
Nature has worked for 14 billion years and we We're stupid enough to believe that are system developed in 10000 years is better. Tsk tsk.
MrGamestop101 2 months ago
the talk starts at 00:47
bakkenkegan 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
When most of our food comes from Urban or Vertical Farming, we could give back much of the farm land back to nature to conquer, we would have full excess to fresh locally grown fruits.
curingaging00 4 months ago
Comment removed
curingaging00 4 months ago
TAXES that's the ONLY issue in the way let's all get together and go meet with the mayor of new York, Chicago, or las Vegas and ask for a law that simply says that any vertical farms in the future could opereate without property taxes there would probably be issues with regular farmers being ticked off but they get huge tax breaks anyway this is a way to make investors say o well this could grow and build more and more on my investment this is just like any other company and could be very profi
VtBudgies 4 months ago
Get rid of the monetary system (money) and this will be extremely possible.
PaulCarnage 5 months ago 9
@PaulCarnage Very true, i often hear people bring up the "loss of farming jobs" as a monetary concern. They don't realize that a monetary system actually creates most of the necessity to sell labor. A farmer may lose his job, but would gain a world without food and water scarcity
SeanTalksTooMuch 4 months ago
@PaulCarnage Damn dirty communists and their hippy ideas! How dare they want to make the world a better place!
Sharangir 1 day ago
no science! nothing to back it up... poor columbia university being associated with this guy! and his plans will never feed the poor: the poor and the hungry will be fed through small scale sustainable agriculture in which they are the owners of their production. hunger is created through enclosure, and the dependence/poverty which follows.
aclinard 10 months ago
Comment removed
NewerJorg 8 months ago
@aclinard Neither in the talk nor in his book he claims it's proven science and ready to go: He wants to raise interrest in the topic so some vertical farm prototypes get built and research is done.
He speaks of some school project "vertical farm" and also about "the genomes" of coming generations that he wishes to look into this idea - because 1 thing is clear (for this you'll find a broad scientific consensus): the way agriculture works today won't feed the people of tomorrow in a sust. way!
NewerJorg 8 months ago
Here is a great example how people get excited and work on ideas that will improve everyones lifes without any money incentive. Check out the Zeitgeist movement, and lets finally make this reality - feed the whole wide world!
koolagoo 10 months ago 17
@koolagoo
Zeitgeists idea = build robots to do work humans do now.
Not going to happen.
MokomaSusi 10 months ago
@MokomaSusi That's not the idea. :) The idea is to do not stop the tecnical progress only because "everyone has to make money for a living". It's gonna happen anyway, only painful way. Just look at what's going on today: soon there will be tremendous numbers of unemployed people. Here's one hillarious article on the subject. Hillarious, but it's no joke...
cracked.com/article_18817_5-reasons-future-will-be-ruled-by-b.s..html
koolagoo 10 months ago
@koolagoo
"soon there will be tremendous numbers of unemployed people. "
Yeah, but that robot revolution wont start anytime soon. Then there is that most important factor: "Idle Hands Are The Devil's Tools" like the saying goes.
Judge Dredd comics give good impression what "Zeitgeist future" would look like.
MokomaSusi 10 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@MokomaSusi
"Zeitgeists idea = build robots to do work humans do now" i think that is a serious oversimplification. Even if you don't agree with the conclusions reached by groups like the Zeitgeist Movement, Technocracy or the Venus Project, the concept of using the scientific method to arrive at the best conclusions possible is an idea worth exploring. Just consider that the Declaration of Independence and The Wealth of Nations (1776) were written almost 100 years before Darwin
SeanTalksTooMuch 4 months ago
@MokomaSusi Yea, I would leave many of the robots out of the equation, but the other ideas in the Venus Project are good.
curingaging00 4 months ago
@curingaging00 automation moves forward whether we like it or not. This has been happening for decades in our current system. Difference is in this system people become unemployed. In a resource based economy using automation means more freedom. Google " Foxconn to replace workers with 1 million robots in 3 years " stories like this one will continue to happen in order for companies to compete. It seems unemployment will continue to rise. It's already happening in this system.
efortune357 4 months ago 2
Comment removed
curingaging00 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@efortune357 Hmm thanks for bringing this into my attention, I do however believe that in the far future, we would still play a large part in technological advancements.
curingaging00 4 months ago
I'd like except I'd say simplify it, make it cheaper and scale it down to start. What if we could build smaller versions in our backyards, vacant houses, and apartments. There are some really good videos on Youtube that show how almost anyone can grow food indoor and outdoors using hydroponics and aeroponics: watch?v=dz6m5370RB0 watch?v=3xUK6A9Bwvk&feature=related and especially watch?v=HMrjQScAQFY
IAmJasonThomas 1 year ago
@IAmJasonThomas yes, i agree these small scale hydroponics are much more realistic than vertical farming. I think I might try it out. They do use a lot of electric power however. After fukushima, with growing resistance to nuclear power and increasingly expensive fossil fuels, I'm starting to wonder what the effect of extremely expensive energy will be on the world 100 years from now. maybe we will all move back to the farm.
sukosuko1 10 months ago
@sukosuko1
Have you heard of EGS? it can domestically supply the US with 140,000 times more power than it consumes. /watch?v=O6r_3AgI49Y
Nuclear on the other hand is relatively weak, only providing 20% of the US power supply. Plus, lots of fuel is used in uranium mining.
Photovoltaic Inks are also on the rise /watch?v=P5ltETpyBK0
Cost effective Wind Turbines are already on the market, such as the Honnewell WT 6500 /watch?v=hMV4NHimFvY&feature=related
in 100 years energy will be as free as air
SeanTalksTooMuch 4 months ago
I highly recommend listening to Dickson Despommier on the 'this week in parasitism' podcast, his original research area. Its really good.
The vertical farm idea is a nice idea but not economically feasible.
sukosuko1 1 year ago
Comment removed
RayDandy 10 months ago
Comment removed
mehdibenm 1 year ago
information we don`t produce anything, I mean we do produce but just a small bit of what we need. I do believe that the success of this kind of project there going to find a lot of people ready to learn and apply some sustainable methods of farming. And this I think is a pretty difficult thing to do.
falci01 1 year ago
The small scale farming is a good idea and I think I what we should start doing. But my point of view is that more people should be involved in growing the food and of course they need to know what they are doing (I mean to be passionate about their job). USA have now only 3-4% of people engaged in food production, and for a sustainable farming to occur I think you need at least 20% of well informed farmers. Here in Romania we have 50% of people living in country side, but without the proper
falci01 1 year ago