Question: 1 way 2 travel space,point to point but then who sets up the receiver 4u2 materialize, or will quantum entanglement have something 2 do with it seeing as we exist in all space/ time at once?How fascinating, or this question "if light has taken a billion years 2arrive at my eye from a star im observing, doesn't that mean id have2 travel a billion times faster than light 2 get there" and will it be the image i see due to time dilation, everything else will have aged exponentially? thanx
@cassiopeiaproject So, I guess like a person in a car doesn't know he is going 60mph, a person going faster than light might not realize he is going back in time. However, what would an outside observer see? And if they both had clocks attached to them how would both observers clocks appear to move in relation to each other?
@alphatelescopii no bc that person isn't accelerating he/she would just skip the speed of light and proceed back in time but bc of the insane speed of light they wouldn't be able to travel that much faster than light so the time traveled back in time would be minuscule and barely even noticeable if at all
There is only one problem so far technically the only way for the two beams of light to move parallel to each-other is if they were fired at the parallel in space so in ur animation the light beam from the still ship couldn't catch up to the other beam bc the would be moving at the same speed
The time has come for Free energy to be revealed ,But Elite controllers don't want ppl to be free from the costs of energy,Get a motor that works with the power of magnets only at LT-MAGNET-MOTORdotCOM ,Be the revolution!
OMG the time and space chart IS scary! So, the faster you move/live etc the slower time "moves" for you. That can be aplied to animals that have slower/faster metabolisms? Time would appear slower (than us) for a humming bird as its metabolism is faster?
what if i would build a warp drive that contracts space in front of me and expands it back of me so that i could travel huge distances without really moving at all. i could go faster from A to B then light. would i travel back in time?
@uut0 Forget the warp drive. If you could travel faster than the speed of light, you would travel backwards in time according to a stationary observer.
@cassiopeiaproject How would this make sense? The observer would see you going back and to the point where you were at c. Then they would see your time as stopping. But knowing that... Before they could see you go backwards, they would see your time stop, and you stop. Or am I approaching this waaaaaaay wrong?
Shut up. Google search "virtual particle" and click on the wikipedia link. These particles can break the e=mc^2 equation. The only reason that I am telling you to shut up is because you brought God into a scientific conversation.
the Bible contains information about what will happen in the future. the future mastered moving faster than light, making for them possible to travel back in time.
This major changed the way I see the world. I always thought that time actualy don't exist in a way scientists are presenting it. But now I see its much more complex. So then it is possible to travel to far away places (like other galaxies) if we reach huge speeds? Cause time would shorten aswell you woul'd get there faster. If this is true we just need the right force to push us trough.
but time for the rest of the matter in the universe would be the same, so to them we'd be frozen in time shooting through space and they would age normally and die.
Question: 1 way 2 travel space,point to point but then who sets up the receiver 4u2 materialize, or will quantum entanglement have something 2 do with it seeing as we exist in all space/ time at once?How fascinating, or this question "if light has taken a billion years 2arrive at my eye from a star im observing, doesn't that mean id have2 travel a billion times faster than light 2 get there" and will it be the image i see due to time dilation, everything else will have aged exponentially? thanx
stingyringpiece 1 month ago
@cassiopeiaproject So, I guess like a person in a car doesn't know he is going 60mph, a person going faster than light might not realize he is going back in time. However, what would an outside observer see? And if they both had clocks attached to them how would both observers clocks appear to move in relation to each other?
lattask8er 6 months ago
If time is still for a beam of light, then why does it take 8.32 minutes for light from the sun to reach the earth?
Alexrulz99 10 months ago 2
@Alexrulz99 8 minutes is the time it takes in YOUR frame of reference -- not the frame of reference of the light.
cassiopeiaproject 10 months ago 2
Jeeves said Nucular
flapinux 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
may i just ask, what chapter deals with length contraction, relativistic mass and twin paradox? thank you so much :)
CenaJane 1 year ago
@alphatelescopii no bc that person isn't accelerating he/she would just skip the speed of light and proceed back in time but bc of the insane speed of light they wouldn't be able to travel that much faster than light so the time traveled back in time would be minuscule and barely even noticeable if at all
zacthemanwonder 1 year ago
There is only one problem so far technically the only way for the two beams of light to move parallel to each-other is if they were fired at the parallel in space so in ur animation the light beam from the still ship couldn't catch up to the other beam bc the would be moving at the same speed
zacthemanwonder 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
The time has come for Free energy to be revealed ,But Elite controllers don't want ppl to be free from the costs of energy,Get a motor that works with the power of magnets only at LT-MAGNET-MOTORdotCOM ,Be the revolution!
cadentavaricegrtrj 1 year ago
OMG the time and space chart IS scary! So, the faster you move/live etc the slower time "moves" for you. That can be aplied to animals that have slower/faster metabolisms? Time would appear slower (than us) for a humming bird as its metabolism is faster?
Squashsplatt 1 year ago
@Squashsplatt
The time won't slow down for You, it will flow normaly to you. INSTEAD, the distance to the place you're moving to will be shortened.
Dannepihls 1 year ago
what if i would build a warp drive that contracts space in front of me and expands it back of me so that i could travel huge distances without really moving at all. i could go faster from A to B then light. would i travel back in time?
uut0 1 year ago
@uut0 Forget the warp drive. If you could travel faster than the speed of light, you would travel backwards in time according to a stationary observer.
cassiopeiaproject 1 year ago
@cassiopeiaproject How would this make sense? The observer would see you going back and to the point where you were at c. Then they would see your time as stopping. But knowing that... Before they could see you go backwards, they would see your time stop, and you stop. Or am I approaching this waaaaaaay wrong?
alphatelescopii 1 year ago
Is Nasa actually coming up with a plan to mine the moon? I thought that was just science fiction.
BeekersSqueakers 2 years ago
Mining is certainly one of the reasons for returning to the moon.
cassiopeiaproject 2 years ago
cool story, bro
TigerSlashX 2 years ago
These guys are making Jeeves do all the work.
BeekersSqueakers 2 years ago
Shut up. Google search "virtual particle" and click on the wikipedia link. These particles can break the e=mc^2 equation. The only reason that I am telling you to shut up is because you brought God into a scientific conversation.
schlynn 2 years ago
the Bible contains information about what will happen in the future. the future mastered moving faster than light, making for them possible to travel back in time.
llsoundwavell 3 years ago
And snakes used to talk...
digitised 2 years ago 2
ah, that's false...
llsoundwavell 2 years ago
Yes of course it is, i read it in an old story book called the bible.
digitised 2 years ago 2
This major changed the way I see the world. I always thought that time actualy don't exist in a way scientists are presenting it. But now I see its much more complex. So then it is possible to travel to far away places (like other galaxies) if we reach huge speeds? Cause time would shorten aswell you woul'd get there faster. If this is true we just need the right force to push us trough.
MaDrung 3 years ago
It is true that if we travel fast enough time-dilation would allow us to reach very distant places.
cassiopeiaproject 3 years ago
but time for the rest of the matter in the universe would be the same, so to them we'd be frozen in time shooting through space and they would age normally and die.
Parson2 2 years ago
Comment removed
Parson2 2 years ago