@candon1972 There are many steel framed structures that have suffered structural failure and collape due to fire. Steel only has to heat to 60% of it's melting point to achieve structural failure. The Fire Chief at 9/11 also investigated WTC 7's collapse and he reported that there was no controlled detonation.
@candon1972 Nice exageration there "the buildings turned to dust". No they did not turn to dust. They collapsed because the lower levels could not support the weight and the kinetic enegy of that weight falling on them. After the collapse they had to cut large slabs of fallen steel structure into smaller sizes because the removal trucks could not carry steel sections in excess of 50 tones away. Please, gross exageration does not do you any favours.
@Spindry96 the termite powder was also found in studys,made in europe. There is no reason why such powder should be there. it´s MOSSAD and the you are welcome to live inside your buble dream, using fake micky mouse $ paper money, while your counrtymen die on wars, working for Israel. If you belive that a airplane can colapse and enter the pentagon on a small punch hole, you need to get a job at Disney also. goodluck, maybe jusus will save you from your sins.
@candon1972 Sorry to burst your delusional bubble but i'm not American and i'm agnostic. I look at all sources of evidence about 9/11 not just fairy tale CT truther sites and lame you tube videos. l suggest you do the same because making rediculous claims that the building turned to dust just makes you look stupid. l guess your going to claim also that the planes were holograms or the Pentagon plane was a missile, lmfao.
@Spindry96 I did not say holograms. Bld. 7 did not fall form a simple fire. Explosives were found. We did also study the powder in europe:. it´s called "samples" Like the samples the US geologigal and pentagon took around afghanistanduring 8 years, to map out, that the country store minimum 1 tirllion US$ on rare earth minerals. 9/11 false flag/mossad/ US is the police bully working for the bankers. Goodnight micky mouse! Enjoy ur CIA paycheck:-)
@candon1972 Iron, sulfur, aluminum, potassium, maganese, flourine and titanium were found in the WTC dust. Most are ingredients in thermate. All these were however also ingredients in the WTC construction, fixtures and equipment. The main byproducts of thermate are aluminum oxide and barium nitrate. Neither of these byproducts were found in the dust. Enjoy buying truther videos, they are depending on you so they don't have to get a real job.
@Spindry96 Thank you micky mouse, that also explain why bld. 7 came down, and why several people from Mossad/israel were arrested on 9/11. And if the top of that building on the north and south tower should really destroy the lower part, it would only destroy a part, same size as the top. There was nothing to drive the demolition all the way to the ground. You had elevators from the basement also, with burned people inside and lots of explotions from below ground. metal vs fuel= easy
@candon1972 the falling WTC upper sections was simply too much weight for the floor they fell onto to withstand. Each floor below quickly gave way as the floors above fell on them. It's pretty simple to understand. It was not just the weight but the kinectic energy of the falling floors. When the planes hit they sent jet fuel fireballs down the elevator shafts. Thats how people in the lobby were burnt and probally also in the basement. Also pretty easy to understand my ass clown friend :)
@Spindry96 the top can´t fall down during 10 sec,and it would crush itself also, making it impossibe to destroy the bld all the way down. Thats free fall speed, and can only happen, if there is "no" building below.
You need your money back from your school, and try again.
I work with buildings, and you "imagine" stuff...
open cartoon network and leave me alone, your IQ is well below zero..
What a waste of time, go to church, talk with jesus or call your zionist friends..
@Spindry96 hello- I´ve been at the best school for physics and engineering in europe. I know about kinetic energy. The pancake theory will not work. The kinetic energy should slow down the speed and when you see a free fall on speed, there is no lost any kinetic energy to the destruction itself. Something else took the building apart, since there was no resistance to break the free fall speed. You need to study 9/11 a lot more.
@candon1972 Free fall? Umm it did not fall at free fall. Did you also consider that as more floors collapsed that more and more weight was added to the falling mass. Yes much of the outer vertical columns were ejected outwards and can be discounted but the inner floor structures cannot. No nothing else trook the building apart, are you trying to claim that bombs were planted on each and every floor? Please don't get any more ridiculous with your arguments!
@Spindry96 - All you say is words, no data. You don´t answer anything and only bring up new words and things to talk about. I don´t claim anything, other than the fact, that a building like WTC should not implode after 1 hr of fire, that by the way were about to end. Only some white smoke came from the fire, lack of fuel. A bld will not fall due to fire like that and since both buildings were both hit by the same thing, why did the tower hit first, also fall first?
@candon1972 I talk facts you talk generalizations, "The WTC turned to dust", "The WTC imploded", your not educated at all it's painfully obvious, stop lying.
@Spindry96 you did not explain why the reinforced bld. 7 experienced free fall. Why the hole on pentagon was not the size of a airplane or why wtc 1 and 2 fell after 1 hr of fire.
You´r talking to the wrong person, maybe because your paraniod jewish mind will not accept reality. some arab people with box cutters, took down the greatest nation of intelligence- no way micky mouse, you´re blind.
@candon1972 Hey fuck you you racist piece of shit, take your racist truther childish propaganda and shove them up your immature ass. Have a nice day fuckwit
@Spindry96 you are really funny Micky mouse. Well you can support md´donalds and tel-aviv all you want, that will not change the facts. Did you know that the US senate just pass for a law, that can keep you in prison under act of war, with no time limit or trial. Thats Nazi USA, your idol. You are a good Nazi..and very funny.
@candon1972 l lost family members to the Nazi's in WW2 you disgusting piece of shit. You would not want to meet me in person because you would not walk away alive
@Spindry96 - The US government used the best Nazi scientists to build the weapons you would later use. They came for the US and had a new passport and job. So you support the nazi through the US government. I hope iran will fire those 11000 missils on israel and saudi make your dollar crash, so your nazi government can take over when chaos start. US deserve pain, for all the blood you cause the world. CIA/MOSSAD/ fuck your world
@Spindry96 - You promote only war and hate, and the brainwash that control your mind, is doing a very good job. If your fundamentalist, it´dosen´t matter if you belive in allah/jesus or satan.. The act is the same, during times of war. No difference what so ever. And the truth is painful to hear, because you live on a lie.
@candon1972 It is very childish of you to call me a Nazi, American, religous, Jewish, a warmonger since you know nothing about me. Yet you persist in ranting rubbish at me and ignoring everything l say. Did you not read that l am not American? What is your problem? Are you a drug user? Is that the only way you can get by in cold shitty Denmark by taking drugs and ranting rude lies at strangers on you tube. Your a sad sad person
@Spindry96 I know that your not American. Actually I don´t forget anything at all. I don´t mind that i should be rude, maybe thats what tou need to see yourself from the outside. Send your money and support for the US government, it´s not my problem. Promote your children to fight for the "free" world of micky mouse, maybe they will return home still alive if they are lucky. Spindry/: Spindoctor/whatever country, you are wrong with 9/11... all the way
@Spindry96 And since you are the one who threatens with violence, you are the primitive one who will go crazy when your brain can´t answer. You did not adress or answer anything, you only come up with more words, while you skip the answers. You are like a tape recorder, but not thinking. Thats called a robot. I don´t belive that you have a high IQ, or feelings being human. You are lost.
@Spindry96 it dosen´t matter how smart you are or how beautiful your theory is. If it don´t match experiment, its wrong. And that why you are wrong. Are you engineer? if so i´ll give you F- on the grade. Don´t waste your time, im not at kindergarden. Watch some your justin bieber videos and do something good for your country- maybe suicide for a change.. That will earn you A+and make the world a better place at the same time... I know about steel and concrete/ weight/speeed/freefall
@candon1972 The WTC was a steel structure protected by flaky fireproofing, that even if it had been 100% firproofing only prolongs the time that it will take for steel to loose it's structural strength in a fire. Concrete reinforced steel building withstand fire which is why the new WTC is being built with Steel Reinforced Concrete. This is fact and your fantasies cannot deny it. Grow up child.
I wonder if I threw some medium large bricks at a 77 story skyscraper it would spontaneously catch on fire, on multiple places, and collapse in a perfect way just hours after that..? Not to mention that there has never been a building with the same structure ever collapsed because of fire. Except WTC 1. And WTC 2. But a building in London having a raging fire from top to bottom floor for 17 HOURS didn't collapse.
wow! didn't look like the tower's were even hit yet and the fires were deliberatly set in i different sections of the buildings really bazzare and definetly strange your right that can't be denied facts are facts they can't begin to challenge or debunked without un covering the the truth but they will never explain it because they know they can't what you see is the truth and what you get as the out come in the face of reality is in there eyes denille
wow! didn't look like the tower's were even hit yet and the firs were deliberatly set i different sections of the buildings really bazzare and definetly strange your right that can't be denied
wtc7 was evacuated at a vey early date AM Because of fires Which were incindentally before either of the towers had collapsed.
This is know and proven fact but doesnt get mentioned a lot for some reason.
research it all you like its true. The building was sealed off and cordoned off This is fact. When Silverstein says pull it he cannot possiby be talking about anything else but the building iltself and BOOM down it went, at free fall acceleration
@Moreofthesamez The lighting in most of those pictures looks like twilight. You know, before the sun comes up.
I'd place the time of those pictures around 6:30 am. to 7:30.
Take a look at the street lamps in your municipality. They run on a timer. It doesn't matter how bright or dark it is, they come on and go off at the same time.
@nivarion If you follow the links the OP provides you'll see that when these photos were taken both towers had already been hit so between 6:30-7:30 is way off the mark, I don't know the exact 911 timeline but the 2nd plane hit after 9AM so no street lights would be on then
@Moreofthesamez Look at the big red glow reflected across the whole face of it. That is gonna be the sun coming up
And besides, if the building was on fire, hundreds of people were around in and through that building through most of the morning. Someone would have noticed it on fire.
Seriously. Look at that last picture. If you think that's a midmorning sky, then you're seriously deluded.
Just looked that police report, page 79. It says that WTC7 lobby was found full of smoke, but also that it was just after the South Tower collapse. We know that WTC7 lobby windows were blown, and lobby filled with soot. So, not conclusive, but I`m still searching.
Gocanes, the pix are cropped b/c the high res is huge and shows both towers in a sequence of pix. See links under 'more info'. Richard, it's not reflections. WTC 7 was evacuated after the 1st plane hit. No smoke b/c they are small fires and no broken windows. Everyone was looking at the towers, not WTC 7. Jennings confirms explosions and heat. Stafford confirms smoke inside WTC 7 just as tower 2 fell. Why do you suppose Giuliani had to relocate the OEM?
"Why do you suppose Giuliani had to relocate the OEM?"
Lol. First of all there was a burning sky scraper with a plane crashed into it. Second, there was another burning sky scraper with a plane crashed into it.
"Richard, it's not reflections."
Proof? Btw. the windows were darkly tinted. So they must've been opened or detroyed to see a fresh fire from this distance.
Furthermore, why start a fire when the towers haven't start collapsing? Makes no sence. Especially with explosives at hand.
Lemsby, the flags are to the right of WTC 7 and across the Hudson. Slipknotjens, it is not sunlight. In the full pic the building is 2/3+ in shadow. It's not interior lights - too bright, plus the power was out. Police report by Lt. Stafford confirms. Click on the 'more info' footjob has near the subscribe link top right and see the links there. Go to Group1. Page 79, start with last paragraph. See also Barry Jennings and Tris McCall links.
O.k wherever the flags were , what you see in those pictures are two flags which are mistaken for fires , go to see the source of the pictures and you will see...again , i know from other sources(Barry Jennings) that there were fires inside building 7 before both tower fell but the proof is certainly not with these pictures , we'll have to look up for something else...
Lemsby, those are NOT flags!!! The flags are much bigger, to the right of WTC7, and are in the foreground of the shots, from across the Hudson, i.e. on the NJ side, where the photographer was. Did you look at the links in the notes section in the upper right corner, under (more info)? Did you read Lt. Stafford's report?
You can see the flags in the last few frames of this video. They are in the center of the shot, and are attached to an octagonal wooden object that looks sort of like a ship's wheel. You can see that it is on the NJ side of the Hudson.
LIpsmalloy , my only concern is the last pic with both towers still standing , do you believe this one shows real fires or flags....i cheked the source and it looks to me there are flags...what do you think...
The supposedly fires are in fact 2 american flags that stands on the opposite side of the water. I found out cause i went to see the source of these pictures...that doesn't mean there wasn't any fire in building 7 before they fell...look for Barry Jennings comments on you tube...R.I.P. Barry
First photo could be reflections of debris burning in the street. No way fires started in 7 prior to Tower 1 impact without thousands knowing. Those floors were occupied. Notice also, no smoke.
Thousands of innocent people died on 9/11 for state sponsored terrorism.
Look at the truth at
---- listep. wordpress. com ----
You will never doubt that the events of 9/11 were state sponsored after reading this. You will never doubt again what happened on that fateful day after reading this.
Real patriots question.
--"The say tyranny and oppression come to this land it will be in the guise of fighting a foreign enemy" -- James Madison
first shot is fake the next one is also fake and 3th one is real 4th one there are two pic's one of them is real and the another one is fake and the last one dont show nothing of building 7.......END OF STORY !!!!!!
This is consistent with the fact they had a fire "drill" (wargame, exercice, drill, whatever) running from I think 8am for seven hours which would prevent any actual fire alarm... But nahhh, scrap this theory, why would they need fires? They could have set of a remote device once the towers collapsed and then blown the collumns, just to have a scapegoat, coz I still don't believe WTC debris can set all kinds of things on fire so easily! And then just cause a simultaneous structural collapse!
@W4d5Y Yes i too think that not only was building riged with explosives but to make the story more believable they had a device or set fires in the building as well.
@W4d5Y From alllll the stories, the weirdest one I think is: ALL people, stuff, everything was burned or destroyed. Tons and tons and tons of debris and paper etc, all going down. BUT they claimed to have found the passport of one of the hijackers after the towers had come down. Remember this guy was in the front seat, engulfed in flames. Also, this guy appearantly still is alive and walking around somewhere in the middle east. He was stunned to see himself on tv being accused of this act.
Well if that is correct and it is on the 12th floor according to worldtradeaftermathdotcom it was the floor of the Securities & Exchange Commission, they had the 11th,12th and 13th floors, just thought that would be interesting to add.
This has been flagged as spam show
@karakittle There were no gas stoves in the towers.
CNN911Fakes 3 months ago
40.000 ton of steel... colapse / no thats impossible!...
candon1972 3 months ago
@candon1972 There are many steel framed structures that have suffered structural failure and collape due to fire. Steel only has to heat to 60% of it's melting point to achieve structural failure. The Fire Chief at 9/11 also investigated WTC 7's collapse and he reported that there was no controlled detonation.
Spindry96 2 months ago
@Spindry96 ohh- so all the buildings turn to dust, from a simple fire, also bld 7... no way.. have a nice dream.
candon1972 2 months ago
@candon1972 Nice exageration there "the buildings turned to dust". No they did not turn to dust. They collapsed because the lower levels could not support the weight and the kinetic enegy of that weight falling on them. After the collapse they had to cut large slabs of fallen steel structure into smaller sizes because the removal trucks could not carry steel sections in excess of 50 tones away. Please, gross exageration does not do you any favours.
Spindry96 2 months ago
@Spindry96 the termite powder was also found in studys,made in europe. There is no reason why such powder should be there. it´s MOSSAD and the you are welcome to live inside your buble dream, using fake micky mouse $ paper money, while your counrtymen die on wars, working for Israel. If you belive that a airplane can colapse and enter the pentagon on a small punch hole, you need to get a job at Disney also. goodluck, maybe jusus will save you from your sins.
candon1972 2 months ago
@candon1972 Sorry to burst your delusional bubble but i'm not American and i'm agnostic. I look at all sources of evidence about 9/11 not just fairy tale CT truther sites and lame you tube videos. l suggest you do the same because making rediculous claims that the building turned to dust just makes you look stupid. l guess your going to claim also that the planes were holograms or the Pentagon plane was a missile, lmfao.
Spindry96 2 months ago
@Spindry96 I did not say holograms. Bld. 7 did not fall form a simple fire. Explosives were found. We did also study the powder in europe:. it´s called "samples" Like the samples the US geologigal and pentagon took around afghanistanduring 8 years, to map out, that the country store minimum 1 tirllion US$ on rare earth minerals. 9/11 false flag/mossad/ US is the police bully working for the bankers. Goodnight micky mouse! Enjoy ur CIA paycheck:-)
candon1972 2 months ago
@candon1972 Iron, sulfur, aluminum, potassium, maganese, flourine and titanium were found in the WTC dust. Most are ingredients in thermate. All these were however also ingredients in the WTC construction, fixtures and equipment. The main byproducts of thermate are aluminum oxide and barium nitrate. Neither of these byproducts were found in the dust. Enjoy buying truther videos, they are depending on you so they don't have to get a real job.
Spindry96 2 months ago
@Spindry96 Thank you micky mouse, that also explain why bld. 7 came down, and why several people from Mossad/israel were arrested on 9/11. And if the top of that building on the north and south tower should really destroy the lower part, it would only destroy a part, same size as the top. There was nothing to drive the demolition all the way to the ground. You had elevators from the basement also, with burned people inside and lots of explotions from below ground. metal vs fuel= easy
candon1972 2 months ago
@candon1972 the falling WTC upper sections was simply too much weight for the floor they fell onto to withstand. Each floor below quickly gave way as the floors above fell on them. It's pretty simple to understand. It was not just the weight but the kinectic energy of the falling floors. When the planes hit they sent jet fuel fireballs down the elevator shafts. Thats how people in the lobby were burnt and probally also in the basement. Also pretty easy to understand my ass clown friend :)
Spindry96 2 months ago
@Spindry96 the top can´t fall down during 10 sec,and it would crush itself also, making it impossibe to destroy the bld all the way down. Thats free fall speed, and can only happen, if there is "no" building below.
You need your money back from your school, and try again.
I work with buildings, and you "imagine" stuff...
open cartoon network and leave me alone, your IQ is well below zero..
What a waste of time, go to church, talk with jesus or call your zionist friends..
candon1972 2 months ago
@Spindry96 hello- I´ve been at the best school for physics and engineering in europe. I know about kinetic energy. The pancake theory will not work. The kinetic energy should slow down the speed and when you see a free fall on speed, there is no lost any kinetic energy to the destruction itself. Something else took the building apart, since there was no resistance to break the free fall speed. You need to study 9/11 a lot more.
candon1972 2 months ago
@candon1972 Free fall? Umm it did not fall at free fall. Did you also consider that as more floors collapsed that more and more weight was added to the falling mass. Yes much of the outer vertical columns were ejected outwards and can be discounted but the inner floor structures cannot. No nothing else trook the building apart, are you trying to claim that bombs were planted on each and every floor? Please don't get any more ridiculous with your arguments!
Spindry96 2 months ago
@Spindry96 - All you say is words, no data. You don´t answer anything and only bring up new words and things to talk about. I don´t claim anything, other than the fact, that a building like WTC should not implode after 1 hr of fire, that by the way were about to end. Only some white smoke came from the fire, lack of fuel. A bld will not fall due to fire like that and since both buildings were both hit by the same thing, why did the tower hit first, also fall first?
candon1972 2 months ago
@candon1972 I talk facts you talk generalizations, "The WTC turned to dust", "The WTC imploded", your not educated at all it's painfully obvious, stop lying.
Spindry96 2 months ago
@Spindry96 you did not explain why the reinforced bld. 7 experienced free fall. Why the hole on pentagon was not the size of a airplane or why wtc 1 and 2 fell after 1 hr of fire.
You´r talking to the wrong person, maybe because your paraniod jewish mind will not accept reality. some arab people with box cutters, took down the greatest nation of intelligence- no way micky mouse, you´re blind.
candon1972 2 months ago
@candon1972 Hey fuck you you racist piece of shit, take your racist truther childish propaganda and shove them up your immature ass. Have a nice day fuckwit
Spindry96 2 months ago
@Spindry96 you are really funny Micky mouse. Well you can support md´donalds and tel-aviv all you want, that will not change the facts. Did you know that the US senate just pass for a law, that can keep you in prison under act of war, with no time limit or trial. Thats Nazi USA, your idol. You are a good Nazi..and very funny.
candon1972 2 months ago
@candon1972 l lost family members to the Nazi's in WW2 you disgusting piece of shit. You would not want to meet me in person because you would not walk away alive
Spindry96 2 months ago
@Spindry96 - The US government used the best Nazi scientists to build the weapons you would later use. They came for the US and had a new passport and job. So you support the nazi through the US government. I hope iran will fire those 11000 missils on israel and saudi make your dollar crash, so your nazi government can take over when chaos start. US deserve pain, for all the blood you cause the world. CIA/MOSSAD/ fuck your world
candon1972 2 months ago
@Spindry96 - You promote only war and hate, and the brainwash that control your mind, is doing a very good job. If your fundamentalist, it´dosen´t matter if you belive in allah/jesus or satan.. The act is the same, during times of war. No difference what so ever. And the truth is painful to hear, because you live on a lie.
candon1972 2 months ago
@candon1972 It is very childish of you to call me a Nazi, American, religous, Jewish, a warmonger since you know nothing about me. Yet you persist in ranting rubbish at me and ignoring everything l say. Did you not read that l am not American? What is your problem? Are you a drug user? Is that the only way you can get by in cold shitty Denmark by taking drugs and ranting rude lies at strangers on you tube. Your a sad sad person
Spindry96 2 months ago
@Spindry96 I know that your not American. Actually I don´t forget anything at all. I don´t mind that i should be rude, maybe thats what tou need to see yourself from the outside. Send your money and support for the US government, it´s not my problem. Promote your children to fight for the "free" world of micky mouse, maybe they will return home still alive if they are lucky. Spindry/: Spindoctor/whatever country, you are wrong with 9/11... all the way
candon1972 2 months ago
@Spindry96 And since you are the one who threatens with violence, you are the primitive one who will go crazy when your brain can´t answer. You did not adress or answer anything, you only come up with more words, while you skip the answers. You are like a tape recorder, but not thinking. Thats called a robot. I don´t belive that you have a high IQ, or feelings being human. You are lost.
candon1972 2 months ago
@Spindry96 it dosen´t matter how smart you are or how beautiful your theory is. If it don´t match experiment, its wrong. And that why you are wrong. Are you engineer? if so i´ll give you F- on the grade. Don´t waste your time, im not at kindergarden. Watch some your justin bieber videos and do something good for your country- maybe suicide for a change.. That will earn you A+and make the world a better place at the same time... I know about steel and concrete/ weight/speeed/freefall
candon1972 2 months ago
@candon1972 The WTC was a steel structure protected by flaky fireproofing, that even if it had been 100% firproofing only prolongs the time that it will take for steel to loose it's structural strength in a fire. Concrete reinforced steel building withstand fire which is why the new WTC is being built with Steel Reinforced Concrete. This is fact and your fantasies cannot deny it. Grow up child.
Spindry96 2 months ago
Comment removed
sh9683 3 months ago
I wonder if I threw some medium large bricks at a 77 story skyscraper it would spontaneously catch on fire, on multiple places, and collapse in a perfect way just hours after that..? Not to mention that there has never been a building with the same structure ever collapsed because of fire. Except WTC 1. And WTC 2. But a building in London having a raging fire from top to bottom floor for 17 HOURS didn't collapse.
Kinneballer36 4 months ago
Great work dude. The last frame showing WTC 7 on fire beside the still standing towers is the clincher...
noozilander 5 months ago
DUH! Those were the lights of the building still turned on in the morning.
domitechture 5 months ago
So one of your pictures specifically says it's 3:00 pm, what evidence do you have that the other pictures are prior to collapse of the towers?
jgoemat 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
WE HAVE THE VIDEO OF WTC7 BEING DEMOLISHED. THE VIDEO SHOWS THE EXPLOSIONS AND IT HAS THE AUDIO. ...ARREST LARRY SILVERSTEIN, NOW!!!
SEARCH: "!MUST WATCH NOW! Visible Explosions !NEW VIDEO! SEPT 2011 WTC Building 7 Controlled Demolition"
Born2Flesh 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
/watch?v=j5FhQc-LJ-o /watch?v=5qFsjdymqSk /watch?v=KhdppHwUJ9k /watch?v=zhnNy5EsebA /watch?v=iGqjzFQvfdI /watch?v=WxqoChniKVU /watch?v=9QWvkAgyIY4 /watch?v=qFpbZ-aLDLY /watch?v=HfmliaqIRBE /watch?v=HSjDCwN2i3w /watch?v=8XRMrMdn0NQ /watch?v=wKuLUu7SQU4 /watch?v=dVutUGDiQN0
megamogx 5 months ago
wow! didn't look like the tower's were even hit yet and the fires were deliberatly set in i different sections of the buildings really bazzare and definetly strange your right that can't be denied facts are facts they can't begin to challenge or debunked without un covering the the truth but they will never explain it because they know they can't what you see is the truth and what you get as the out come in the face of reality is in there eyes denille
irobot2009able 8 months ago
@irobot2009able at 0:17 you see debris from one or both of the fallen towers to the left. Not taken between 9:15 and 9:45.
rickyseabra 6 months ago
wow! didn't look like the tower's were even hit yet and the firs were deliberatly set i different sections of the buildings really bazzare and definetly strange your right that can't be denied
irobot2009able 8 months ago
wtc7 was evacuated at a vey early date AM Because of fires Which were incindentally before either of the towers had collapsed.
This is know and proven fact but doesnt get mentioned a lot for some reason.
research it all you like its true. The building was sealed off and cordoned off This is fact. When Silverstein says pull it he cannot possiby be talking about anything else but the building iltself and BOOM down it went, at free fall acceleration
No mystery here wtc7 was demolished
zenoist2 9 months ago
Its pretty obvious that something else started the fires in WTC-7. It couldn't have been from the falling debris.
infoseeker264 10 months ago
Sun rising!
Just like every morning!
Humantidote 1 year ago
@Humantidote that is not the sun. look again! its one the shaded side of the buildng
lauriebeabea 9 months ago
Doesn't have enough red for a fire. Though they are interesting pictures.
Street lamp maybe? A lot of them are that color.
The light on the right is small and round. The one on the left is blotchy and large and on the stone part.
nivarion 1 year ago
@nivarion Street lights on a bright September morning?
Moreofthesamez 1 year ago
@Moreofthesamez The lighting in most of those pictures looks like twilight. You know, before the sun comes up.
I'd place the time of those pictures around 6:30 am. to 7:30.
Take a look at the street lamps in your municipality. They run on a timer. It doesn't matter how bright or dark it is, they come on and go off at the same time.
nivarion 1 year ago
@nivarion If you follow the links the OP provides you'll see that when these photos were taken both towers had already been hit so between 6:30-7:30 is way off the mark, I don't know the exact 911 timeline but the 2nd plane hit after 9AM so no street lights would be on then
Moreofthesamez 1 year ago
@Moreofthesamez Look at the big red glow reflected across the whole face of it. That is gonna be the sun coming up
And besides, if the building was on fire, hundreds of people were around in and through that building through most of the morning. Someone would have noticed it on fire.
Seriously. Look at that last picture. If you think that's a midmorning sky, then you're seriously deluded.
nivarion 1 year ago
Just looked that police report, page 79. It says that WTC7 lobby was found full of smoke, but also that it was just after the South Tower collapse. We know that WTC7 lobby windows were blown, and lobby filled with soot. So, not conclusive, but I`m still searching.
ku11erv0 1 year ago
Gocanes, the pix are cropped b/c the high res is huge and shows both towers in a sequence of pix. See links under 'more info'. Richard, it's not reflections. WTC 7 was evacuated after the 1st plane hit. No smoke b/c they are small fires and no broken windows. Everyone was looking at the towers, not WTC 7. Jennings confirms explosions and heat. Stafford confirms smoke inside WTC 7 just as tower 2 fell. Why do you suppose Giuliani had to relocate the OEM?
LipsMalloy 2 years ago
"Why do you suppose Giuliani had to relocate the OEM?"
Lol. First of all there was a burning sky scraper with a plane crashed into it. Second, there was another burning sky scraper with a plane crashed into it.
"Richard, it's not reflections."
Proof? Btw. the windows were darkly tinted. So they must've been opened or detroyed to see a fresh fire from this distance.
Furthermore, why start a fire when the towers haven't start collapsing? Makes no sence. Especially with explosives at hand.
palasta 2 years ago
Lemsby, the flags are to the right of WTC 7 and across the Hudson. Slipknotjens, it is not sunlight. In the full pic the building is 2/3+ in shadow. It's not interior lights - too bright, plus the power was out. Police report by Lt. Stafford confirms. Click on the 'more info' footjob has near the subscribe link top right and see the links there. Go to Group1. Page 79, start with last paragraph. See also Barry Jennings and Tris McCall links.
LipsMalloy 2 years ago
O.k wherever the flags were , what you see in those pictures are two flags which are mistaken for fires , go to see the source of the pictures and you will see...again , i know from other sources(Barry Jennings) that there were fires inside building 7 before both tower fell but the proof is certainly not with these pictures , we'll have to look up for something else...
lemsby 2 years ago
Lemsby, those are NOT flags!!! The flags are much bigger, to the right of WTC7, and are in the foreground of the shots, from across the Hudson, i.e. on the NJ side, where the photographer was. Did you look at the links in the notes section in the upper right corner, under (more info)? Did you read Lt. Stafford's report?
LipsMalloy 2 years ago
You can see the flags in the last few frames of this video. They are in the center of the shot, and are attached to an octagonal wooden object that looks sort of like a ship's wheel. You can see that it is on the NJ side of the Hudson.
LipsMalloy 2 years ago
LIpsmalloy , my only concern is the last pic with both towers still standing , do you believe this one shows real fires or flags....i cheked the source and it looks to me there are flags...what do you think...
lemsby 2 years ago
u said in the morning , it can be the sunrise shining on the windows ?
slipknotjens 2 years ago
The supposedly fires are in fact 2 american flags that stands on the opposite side of the water. I found out cause i went to see the source of these pictures...that doesn't mean there wasn't any fire in building 7 before they fell...look for Barry Jennings comments on you tube...R.I.P. Barry
lemsby 3 years ago
Dude you're a dumbass! There isn't a time stamp on any of these photographs, and most of the ones of Tower 7 that are shown 1 and 2 already fell.
This is like showing you a picture of Jimmy Hoffa or JFK and saying "Oh I took it this morning, he's still alive" and you believing it. Good job.
gocanes93 3 years ago
First photo could be reflections of debris burning in the street. No way fires started in 7 prior to Tower 1 impact without thousands knowing. Those floors were occupied. Notice also, no smoke.
richardcameron 3 years ago
WOW!!!! Smokeless fire, How did they do that?
What a retard
KevinReppert 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Thousands of innocent people died on 9/11 for state sponsored terrorism.
Look at the truth at
---- listep. wordpress. com ----
You will never doubt that the events of 9/11 were state sponsored after reading this. You will never doubt again what happened on that fateful day after reading this.
Real patriots question.
--"The say tyranny and oppression come to this land it will be in the guise of fighting a foreign enemy" -- James Madison
Spread the truth!
JewFor911Truth 3 years ago
WOAH!!! The dumbass found lights!! congrats! here's a cokkie
MagicM4n500 3 years ago
first shot is fake the next one is also fake and 3th one is real 4th one there are two pic's one of them is real and the another one is fake and the last one dont show nothing of building 7.......END OF STORY !!!!!!
andrewbklynny1 3 years ago
Is it possible to know where exactly you found the original photo ...
lemsby 3 years ago
Naw, that's fake, they were not on fire before the towers fell
jeffmay1 3 years ago
Barry Jennings reported from WTC7 that the place was blowing up before the towers fell. Hear the audio clip posted on my YT profile on my "URL".
Freedomlover911 4 years ago 16
This is consistent with the fact they had a fire "drill" (wargame, exercice, drill, whatever) running from I think 8am for seven hours which would prevent any actual fire alarm... But nahhh, scrap this theory, why would they need fires? They could have set of a remote device once the towers collapsed and then blown the collumns, just to have a scapegoat, coz I still don't believe WTC debris can set all kinds of things on fire so easily! And then just cause a simultaneous structural collapse!
W4d5Y 4 years ago 14
Right.
footjob56 4 years ago
@W4d5Y Yes i too think that not only was building riged with explosives but to make the story more believable they had a device or set fires in the building as well.
ajgio 1 year ago
@W4d5Y From alllll the stories, the weirdest one I think is: ALL people, stuff, everything was burned or destroyed. Tons and tons and tons of debris and paper etc, all going down. BUT they claimed to have found the passport of one of the hijackers after the towers had come down. Remember this guy was in the front seat, engulfed in flames. Also, this guy appearantly still is alive and walking around somewhere in the middle east. He was stunned to see himself on tv being accused of this act.
MrStudyDude 9 months ago
ultimate proof of pre-knowledge?
crippled82 4 years ago 2
Smoking Gun !
FERAUTO 4 years ago 4
Where did you find the original photo ?
HansVerbeek 4 years ago
when were they taken?
W4d5Y 4 years ago
I think they wre taken between 9.15 a.m. and 9.45 a.m.
footjob56 4 years ago
how is this proof if you are not even sure when these pictures were taken? lol
DutchSchultz87 4 years ago
Well if that is correct and it is on the 12th floor according to worldtradeaftermathdotcom it was the floor of the Securities & Exchange Commission, they had the 11th,12th and 13th floors, just thought that would be interesting to add.
truefictions 4 years ago 2
If it is true it is impressive.
truefictions 4 years ago 2