Its all in how you define 'information.' The amount of information in the DNA double helix is exponentially infinite but apparently it is information that directs the formation of amino acids - proteins - hormones to every known part of the life form it replicates. It is interesting to know that proteins replicate DNA which then replicates proteins etc.
I would not compute life form cellular information with a Dell computer storing 1 and 0s.
No, I do not think that is how information works. Information carries a message to convey a meaning, and sometimes information is not information to other beings. To humans, it is not easy to read foreign languages, but with proper training we can.
Same with cells, some cells understand some type of information while another doesn't, and sometimes it requires a translater, like RNA.
But the most that I was saying is that the conversion is blatantly wrong.
I do not think tht information carries a message to convey anything. Our solid universe, our cells, the chair you sit on, your brain, toenail, sun, black hole and everything else is not solid but my belief to be really nothing more or less than pure information. Particles are nothing more than condensed energy (E=mc2) and energy is information. What seems real to humans, in my opinion, is nothing more than information. Check out CBMR which was discovered in 1965.
If you really want to see a enigma type in the words - DNA Nebula - in your google search engine. Scientists had never seen an 80 light year long DNA template of all life forms right out there in our galaxy. To avoid ID they quickly came up with the explanation that this was the result of a strong magnetic force from a dark hole some 300 hundred light years away that twisted into this mirror image found in all cells in earth.
Dude, Darwinism ISN'T science. It's nowhere near it. You're being lied to. Give it up. You're sounding stupid. Look up the origin of science and feel angry with your self for listening and believing the ass-garbage they hand feed you. Sad. <=(
Incorrect in converting the amount of information in a cell into computer information.
I'll double check it right now to be sure, but just fyi.
CamanEmpire 3 years ago
Its all in how you define 'information.' The amount of information in the DNA double helix is exponentially infinite but apparently it is information that directs the formation of amino acids - proteins - hormones to every known part of the life form it replicates. It is interesting to know that proteins replicate DNA which then replicates proteins etc.
I would not compute life form cellular information with a Dell computer storing 1 and 0s.
onycho1 3 years ago
No, I do not think that is how information works. Information carries a message to convey a meaning, and sometimes information is not information to other beings. To humans, it is not easy to read foreign languages, but with proper training we can.
Same with cells, some cells understand some type of information while another doesn't, and sometimes it requires a translater, like RNA.
But the most that I was saying is that the conversion is blatantly wrong.
CamanEmpire 3 years ago
I do not think tht information carries a message to convey anything. Our solid universe, our cells, the chair you sit on, your brain, toenail, sun, black hole and everything else is not solid but my belief to be really nothing more or less than pure information. Particles are nothing more than condensed energy (E=mc2) and energy is information. What seems real to humans, in my opinion, is nothing more than information. Check out CBMR which was discovered in 1965.
onycho1 3 years ago
If you really want to see a enigma type in the words - DNA Nebula - in your google search engine. Scientists had never seen an 80 light year long DNA template of all life forms right out there in our galaxy. To avoid ID they quickly came up with the explanation that this was the result of a strong magnetic force from a dark hole some 300 hundred light years away that twisted into this mirror image found in all cells in earth.
onycho1 3 years ago
Dude, Darwinism ISN'T science. It's nowhere near it. You're being lied to. Give it up. You're sounding stupid. Look up the origin of science and feel angry with your self for listening and believing the ass-garbage they hand feed you. Sad. <=(
BlueMageWithSoulEdge 3 years ago
*bows down to him for saying something I wasn't brave enough to say*
CamanEmpire 3 years ago