Do you believe in once saved always saved? Meaning no matter what you do once you said "the sinners prayer" so called, you can live however you desire as long as you attend church because your saved by grace and once you pray the prayer, no matter how you live you're going to heaven? NO WHERE IN THE TEXT DOES IT SAY THAT PEOPLE ARE JUDGING GOD. YOU SAID THAT! @:39 you say "...people are always judging God. Maybe, but the text does not agree with that statement.
We as Christians are supposed to judge our brothers and sisters in Christ. We do not judge to condemn, we judge to correct. I am not to judge someone if I am doing the same thing. The verses in context have nothing to do with "us" judging God.
You need to re read Roman if you have read it at all in context. Paul is speakng to Roman objectors in chapters 1 and 2. You have made a private interpretation.
@GraceBibleFN Sorry buddie but I make no apologies. It's YOU with the private interpretation. You do this to make Gods Word fit into your life rather than the other way around.
Romans 2:1 says, therefore, so we must see that the context is established at the end of chapter 1. So as in 1:30 these are haters of God. Is this the Christians judging each other you were talking about? Or the ones worthy of death in 1 vs. 32 the Christians you are speaking of?
@GraceBibleFN Therefore thou art inexcusable...speaks to anyone practicing a sin they themselves judge others of practicing. Nowhere in the text of Romans do we hear or are we told these people (whoever they may be) are judging God. That's the part of your video I was addressing...
By the way, I apologize for copping an attitude when I said "sorry buddie". That was rude and I repent for that.
Jesus' Way is the ONLY WAY going to God's eternal glorious kingdom. He was baptized by John in this ministry, then preached for 31/2 yrs. in this God-given religion. Apostle Paul was baptized in this Way (a former Pharisee), also the Virgin Mary and her four sons and daughers to Joseph. All the prophets of God and His disciples were members of this WAY. Enoch, the 7th from Adam is "The Way" 1st prophet. It is the only one from God, others are all man-made and not the right way to heaven.
How can there be multiple ways to God when every man is just in his own eyes? People who don't believe in Christ as the only way don't seem to understand this. There must be one righteous way. There must be a definite understanding of what is wicked and what is righteous. If you are righteous in your own eyes, then who isn't righteous in your opinion? Every sinner justifies his own actions, no matter how grotesque.
Sin is a concept used to force others to submit to one particular moral view. There's no such thing as sin. Hitler wasn't a sinner, but he did horrible things. I agree with you if you think Hitler didn't have good morals.
I don't think anything is sin. Sin doesn't exist. There are morally corrupt behaviors, there's fucked up shit that people do, but there's no such thing as sin.
Morally corrupt language is a nazi saying jews need to die. Saying "fuck" is a normal part of language, there's nothing morally wrong with "swear words." Can you say that people do fucked up shit in a better way?
But onto the question at hand. Yes, I think I have good morals. I don't rape, I don't kill, I don't oppress, I don't bully, I don't assault people, I don't try to take rights away from people, etc. My recent past is completely devoid of morally despicable actions.
So we have the moral 10 or multiple commandments of appleguy77. You make your morals to suit yourself. Yes your language is immoral, is shows an intellectual depravity. I feel bullied and assaulted by your language after I asked you not to use it but you do it anyway, therefore you have broken your own self-made morals. You make morals according to your own standard. So did Hitler.
@GraceBibleFN Or have you said hurtful things to others, voted for politicians who promise to "spread the wealth", had sex with someone who is not your spouse or goofed off when you should have been working? What God calls sin hurts people as individuals and as societies/nations so to say sin doesn't exist is itself immoral ... and, like it or not, you do have a holy Creator, Counselor and JUDGE. There is a price to pay for being evil (sinful) in this life and the next.
Thats what I tell people too. Heaven is GOD's home, God is willing to let EVERYBODY come and live with Him, IF they come in the way He tells them to get in. WHY do people think they have the right to tell God - "NO! I will get into Heaven MY OWN WAY!!" God's LOCK is STRONG - NOBODY gets in except through God's SON who God gave for us, to prove how much He loves us. If we don't accept Jesus, we DO NOT get in.
The Bible is as alive today as ever & is the HOLY & true WORD OF GOD!!
Why,for 1, would one base all on an old book, or just one for that matter, all allegory and mythology, and not think and feel for yourself? You'll waste with me if you just cite religious mumbo jumbo.
Actually that old book is about theology. Also when you make up what feels good you will always choose to worship what feels right in your own eyes. Many bad things feel good to the people that do them.
Good and full of strong teaching, many churches have weak preaching. Many Christians can't deffend there faith. They only say Jesus loves you everything is allright we love eachother and that is good, but we also must deffend the faith by the Holy Spirit.
God gave us the knowledge/concept known as 'free will'--What each one of us chooses to do, good or evil, with our will determines where we'll end our lives when we're called to leave this earth...Mikey
It is fairly obvious that you did not come to this video to hear Pastor Tassi's message. It appears that you enjoy insulting Christians with provocation to inflame me and others who are not social progressives and it does not work and is only a thin weak veil at best,........... these types of attacks are inadequate, immature, dysfunctional & aggressive in nature, at best a failed pathetic attempt to glean attention and to gain Power, Control, Domination, and/or Subjugation.
I was sent this video and commented on the theological question at hand. You then made a bunch ridiculous and completely irrelevant arguments. I disagreed. If this upset you then I apologize but I think you're being disingenuous. How would YouTube get me power and domination? Hahahaha...
Nobody is "judging" God. It is important, however, that we match the claims of certain theologies with their own notion of God in order that we might find if it's consistent. The notion that God would expect everyone to "accept" a particular historical figure is inconsistent with a loving, merciful God.
I also think the notion that because we do something, that God would be justified in doing it is absurd. Ought not more mercy and justice be expected from God?
Thank you for the laugh, you sound as snotty and full of yourself as Keith Olbermann. Perhaps you should apply for a job at MSNBC; lol Now keep that thesaurus close by; lol
Good ad hom argument. I understand that when the words get too big, you have to lash out at somebody's education or attack them personally. It is tiresome, though...
Every religion has heard of Jesus. Every culture has heard of the God of the Bible. I was raised to be atheist. You say it is not judging God but then you say it is not just for the God of the Bible to act this way. This is a judgment. Justice is expected from God. All who have sinned have fallen from His glory. To not receive the payment for sin in the sacrifice of His only begotten Son is the ultimate rejection of mercy. God loves man and is pleading to you to receive such mercy.
I've made a video about my problems with the notion of the sanctifying quality of Jesus' sacrifice.
Your arguments presuppose accepting your particular interpretation of scripture. That won't convince anybody who doesn't already accept that narrow interpretation.
I'm saying that I don't believe the particular interpretation you espouse because it is internally inconsistent. Your conception of God and your explanation of how he decides who is eternally damned is contradictory, in my opinion.
How is it just that God ought to expect a person raised in a Muslim or Hindu country to have the same chance of "accepting" Jesus as we do in the U.S.? Nobody asked to be born or to be born into their situation and to be condemned to eternal damnation because you were born in the wrong country simply doesn't make any sense. This is why, given the striking similarities amongst the world religions, it is much more consistent to consider the religions of the world as many paths to the same goal.
There are NOT striking similarities and if you notice only people who follow one religion have taken it upon themselves to try to murder all those who disagree with them.
I assume you're talking about the Crusades or the Spanish Inquisition. Listen, I don't hold that against Christians in general and you shouldn't either. Those actions were certainly not indicative of the Christian Faith and fly in the face of Christian values. These events really represented specific historical and political conditions while religion was simply a rationalization.
BigSpoon: No, I'm speaking of Islamic terrorists today, but it would also be appropriate to speak of Islamic terrorists of the past as well, which were the reason for the Crusades. Also, what was mohammad but a war lord?
Not that Islam has anything to do with this video or has any bearing on your argument except to divert attention from the point:
Is the Spanish Inquisition or the Crusaders' wholesale attempts to exterminate the Jews of Europe on their way to the holy land indicative of Christianity? So, why should I be convinced that so-called Muslim extremists are acting as good Muslims?
Please, tell me what "Islamic terrorism" spawned the Crusades. This ought to be entertaining.
You don't get to cite a right-wing nutjob reclassification of history in making an argument. Just because some "historian" with an axe to grind decided to classify the political expansion of the various Islamic empires as a Crusade doesn't mean that that is at all convincing. Yes, Muslim kingdoms expanded and did so using military might, just like Christian ones did. Just because it helps your argument, you don't get to make a false-equivalency by comparing it to the Crusades.
How many times in the past two paragraphs have you satated : "You don't get to" Let me tell you something YOU DON'T HAVE THE RIGHT NOR MEANS TO TELL ME WHAT I MAY OR MAY NOT DO.
You may twist history in any way that fits your hateful worldview, you may wear your wife beater shirts and try to be a youtube version of Olbermann, knock yourself out and for that matter, spend your days w/ your trusty thesaurus, but know, that none of these actions help your backward theories.
I'm expressing to you why you don't get to make the arguments you are making and be convincing. Excuse the word choice. I don't know why you would choose to take that to mean that I was trying to control your actions...It seems as though you are really reaching here.
You are the one twisting history. Only in the extremely right-wing view of history does any idea of a "1000 year Muslim Crusade" exist. My ideas are pretty well-established fact.
Actually your theories are NOT "well-established" except by progressives who wish to rewrite history to suit their political ends.
Perhaps you have a reading problem here, I said the last two paragraphs. No matter, the point is that you have no right to tell me what I may or may not do. GET IT!
Do you own research; you have obviously done nothing w/ the first article I sent. I know this is a little game for you but it is a big waste of my time as there is nothing to gain but more insults from a control freak.
And what, exactly, is "hateful" about my worldview? What is my worldview?
I mean, if you've been reduced to commenting on my clothing the discussion is in a pretty sad state. All you've done is divert attention from the original issue, and launch ad hom tirades about my shirt and my thesaurus (I really don't know what you're talking about there. Are you referring to my vocabulary? I don't even own a thesaurus).
Okay, you may point out a typing error on my part but accuse me of diverting attention if I mention your wearing a tacky wife beater; lol
Unless you are living in the distant past or enjoy cluttering your home with tools that are available on the Internet I'd not guess that you have a thesaurus in book form sitting in your pocket, oops sorry, wife beaters have no pockets; lol.
Your apologist and anti-Christian viewpoints are fairly obvious.
I corrected one of your several spelling errors as a poor attempt at humor. If that is horrible then I apologize. I then went on to address the substance of the comment. You have made a few comments on my clothing over two videos while running from the actual issue.
You clearly don't know what you are talking avout. I have made several videos defending Christianity and often argue with it's detractors in comments when they make arguments like you make here.
There is a difference between a typing error and spelling error but I know your game. Oh, look you made a little typing error "You clearly don't know what you are talking avout" or was that a spelling error?
Whatever, I sick of your insults and control freak nature. I'll spend the afternoon w/ an intelligent and respectful man, my husband. Bye Bye
In fact, that's my point. The Crusades were framed as a religious undertaking but I don't believe they were representative of true Christianity. You don't get to have it both ways. The Crusaders who massacred the population of Jerusalem weren't acting in the spirit of Christ, nor were the Inquisitors. Likewise, the Muslims who expanded in the Midieval Period and the modern extremists are acting for political reasons.
,but you and me must intercede for those we love and dont know Jesus yet,like Abrhaam did for hes nethew,he ask to God dont let Ló die in Sodoma,we must interceded for those we love too,for Jesus come to your lives!!!
The most logical discussion I have heard on this subject. The only way to heaven is through Jesus. The only way, if anyone tells you otherwise he is atempting to decieve you, trust me
Do you believe in once saved always saved? Meaning no matter what you do once you said "the sinners prayer" so called, you can live however you desire as long as you attend church because your saved by grace and once you pray the prayer, no matter how you live you're going to heaven? NO WHERE IN THE TEXT DOES IT SAY THAT PEOPLE ARE JUDGING GOD. YOU SAID THAT! @:39 you say "...people are always judging God. Maybe, but the text does not agree with that statement.
YouThoughtYouKnew 2 years ago
We as Christians are supposed to judge our brothers and sisters in Christ. We do not judge to condemn, we judge to correct. I am not to judge someone if I am doing the same thing. The verses in context have nothing to do with "us" judging God.
Poor interpretation of scripture.
YouThoughtYouKnew 2 years ago
You need to re read Roman if you have read it at all in context. Paul is speakng to Roman objectors in chapters 1 and 2. You have made a private interpretation.
GraceBibleFN 2 years ago
@GraceBibleFN Sorry buddie but I make no apologies. It's YOU with the private interpretation. You do this to make Gods Word fit into your life rather than the other way around.
YouThoughtYouKnew 2 years ago
Romans 2:1 says, therefore, so we must see that the context is established at the end of chapter 1. So as in 1:30 these are haters of God. Is this the Christians judging each other you were talking about? Or the ones worthy of death in 1 vs. 32 the Christians you are speaking of?
GraceBibleFN 2 years ago
@GraceBibleFN Therefore thou art inexcusable...speaks to anyone practicing a sin they themselves judge others of practicing. Nowhere in the text of Romans do we hear or are we told these people (whoever they may be) are judging God. That's the part of your video I was addressing...
By the way, I apologize for copping an attitude when I said "sorry buddie". That was rude and I repent for that.
YouThoughtYouKnew 2 years ago
So Christians are storing up wrath for the day of judgment? Romans 2:5
No! There is no condemnation for those who are in Christ Jesus. Christians are nowhere in the context of chapters 1 and 2 of Romans.
GraceBibleFN 2 years ago
Concerning judgement I should say.
GraceBibleFN 2 years ago
God bless you - thanks for posting! Love and Light - Sharine
SharineONeill 2 years ago
Jesus' Way is the ONLY WAY going to God's eternal glorious kingdom. He was baptized by John in this ministry, then preached for 31/2 yrs. in this God-given religion. Apostle Paul was baptized in this Way (a former Pharisee), also the Virgin Mary and her four sons and daughers to Joseph. All the prophets of God and His disciples were members of this WAY. Enoch, the 7th from Adam is "The Way" 1st prophet. It is the only one from God, others are all man-made and not the right way to heaven.
jesuswayph 2 years ago
Correct me if I'm wrong, but this just seems like a sermon. How is that a good argument?
appleguy77 2 years ago
appleguy. So you agree then that Jesus being the only way is fair?
GraceBibleFN 2 years ago
Amen
iToyRobot 2 years ago
How can there be multiple ways to God when every man is just in his own eyes? People who don't believe in Christ as the only way don't seem to understand this. There must be one righteous way. There must be a definite understanding of what is wicked and what is righteous. If you are righteous in your own eyes, then who isn't righteous in your opinion? Every sinner justifies his own actions, no matter how grotesque.
Muerta06 2 years ago
It would do you good to be a little more skeptical of your religion.
Sinners? Why view humans as sinners? People with real morals laugh at that.
appleguy77 2 years ago
and I would expect them to laugh. my comment "every sinner justifies his own actions no matter how grotesque" explains that.
Muerta06 2 years ago
Fail.
appleguy77 2 years ago
appleguy, was Hitler a sinner and was he human?
GraceBibleFN 2 years ago
You need to define sinner and sin before I can answer that.
appleguy77 2 years ago
You need a definition of how Hitler was a sinner?
GraceBibleFN 2 years ago
Sin is a concept used to force others to submit to one particular moral view. There's no such thing as sin. Hitler wasn't a sinner, but he did horrible things. I agree with you if you think Hitler didn't have good morals.
appleguy77 2 years ago
So then you would believe that Progressive Liberalism is sin because they are trying to impose their morals on society?
GraceBibleFN 2 years ago
I don't think you understand.
I don't think anything is sin. Sin doesn't exist. There are morally corrupt behaviors, there's fucked up shit that people do, but there's no such thing as sin.
appleguy77 2 years ago
Yes like the morally corrupt language you are using. Please stop. So are you a good moral person?
GraceBibleFN 2 years ago
Morally corrupt language is a nazi saying jews need to die. Saying "fuck" is a normal part of language, there's nothing morally wrong with "swear words." Can you say that people do fucked up shit in a better way?
But onto the question at hand. Yes, I think I have good morals. I don't rape, I don't kill, I don't oppress, I don't bully, I don't assault people, I don't try to take rights away from people, etc. My recent past is completely devoid of morally despicable actions.
appleguy77 2 years ago
So we have the moral 10 or multiple commandments of appleguy77. You make your morals to suit yourself. Yes your language is immoral, is shows an intellectual depravity. I feel bullied and assaulted by your language after I asked you not to use it but you do it anyway, therefore you have broken your own self-made morals. You make morals according to your own standard. So did Hitler.
GraceBibleFN 2 years ago
I find your language a despicable action. Would you talk like that to your mother?
You also left out the obvious morals such lying and stealing. Have you lied and or stolen?
GraceBibleFN 2 years ago
@GraceBibleFN Or have you said hurtful things to others, voted for politicians who promise to "spread the wealth", had sex with someone who is not your spouse or goofed off when you should have been working? What God calls sin hurts people as individuals and as societies/nations so to say sin doesn't exist is itself immoral ... and, like it or not, you do have a holy Creator, Counselor and JUDGE. There is a price to pay for being evil (sinful) in this life and the next.
BondiHarry 1 year ago
thank you for sharing this video... god bless you my friend.
~Eleven
SoaringEleven 2 years ago
Thats what I tell people too. Heaven is GOD's home, God is willing to let EVERYBODY come and live with Him, IF they come in the way He tells them to get in. WHY do people think they have the right to tell God - "NO! I will get into Heaven MY OWN WAY!!" God's LOCK is STRONG - NOBODY gets in except through God's SON who God gave for us, to prove how much He loves us. If we don't accept Jesus, we DO NOT get in.
The Bible is as alive today as ever & is the HOLY & true WORD OF GOD!!
ladyjeani 2 years ago
Amen ladyjeani!
MelodyOfVision 2 years ago
I am the truth the way and the life, no man comes to the father, but by me...
Jesus Christ
jesuskopp 2 years ago
religion is stupid
jerrydoubleu 2 years ago
In what way?
jesuskopp 2 years ago
Why,for 1, would one base all on an old book, or just one for that matter, all allegory and mythology, and not think and feel for yourself? You'll waste with me if you just cite religious mumbo jumbo.
jerrydoubleu 2 years ago
Actually that old book is about theology. Also when you make up what feels good you will always choose to worship what feels right in your own eyes. Many bad things feel good to the people that do them.
GraceBibleFN 2 years ago
Grace--don't worry about it. U need fundamentalism. I don't. fugedibout it.
jerrydoubleu 2 years ago
What makes you think you are un able to think and feel for yourself, just because you believe in the Bible?
We call this free will, and are you not expressing it right now?
jesuskopp 2 years ago
Good and full of strong teaching, many churches have weak preaching. Many Christians can't deffend there faith. They only say Jesus loves you everything is allright we love eachother and that is good, but we also must deffend the faith by the Holy Spirit.
God Bless you al
EagleWings777 2 years ago
I'm only commenting here to tell whoever sent this to stop sending me these videos. I don't want to hear it anymore.
Jing737 2 years ago
If you received this video you are on my friends list for GBFNorwalk. You can remove yourself. God Bless and Jesus is LORD!
GraceBibleFN 2 years ago
John 14:6 Jesus saith unto him, I am the way, the truth, and the life: no man cometh unto the Father, but by me. Enough said!!!
arthurleino 2 years ago
THANK YOU VERY MUCH!!!
This was good spiritual food.
Keep sending me these videos.
RPM11111 2 years ago
Thanks for the comment!
GraceBibleFN 2 years ago
I was sent this video, reason why I am commenting, in spite of not having watched it!!
HE IS THE POTTER, we are the clay!
I guess that answers the absurdity of such a question quite well!!
RainhadoCanto10 2 years ago
I suppose you would enjoy my channel devoted to 5 point Calvinism (which would explain your absurd answer). User name GBFNorwalk.
GraceBibleFN 2 years ago
NO THANKS!!
I doubt I'd have the stomach for it!
Please, do not send me any more garbage!
RainhadoCanto4 2 years ago
Thank the Lord for His Word of Spirit and Life!!!
o7jimmy 2 years ago
God gave us the knowledge/concept known as 'free will'--What each one of us chooses to do, good or evil, with our will determines where we'll end our lives when we're called to leave this earth...Mikey
WarlordFeyd 2 years ago
Little Spoon:
It is fairly obvious that you did not come to this video to hear Pastor Tassi's message. It appears that you enjoy insulting Christians with provocation to inflame me and others who are not social progressives and it does not work and is only a thin weak veil at best,........... these types of attacks are inadequate, immature, dysfunctional & aggressive in nature, at best a failed pathetic attempt to glean attention and to gain Power, Control, Domination, and/or Subjugation.
ScarlettKnights 2 years ago
I was sent this video and commented on the theological question at hand. You then made a bunch ridiculous and completely irrelevant arguments. I disagreed. If this upset you then I apologize but I think you're being disingenuous. How would YouTube get me power and domination? Hahahaha...
BigSpoon19 2 years ago
Little Spoon: cont. Keep your emotionally-draining, pointless,never-ending, useless, ranting to yourself!
ScarlettKnights 2 years ago
Nobody is "judging" God. It is important, however, that we match the claims of certain theologies with their own notion of God in order that we might find if it's consistent. The notion that God would expect everyone to "accept" a particular historical figure is inconsistent with a loving, merciful God.
I also think the notion that because we do something, that God would be justified in doing it is absurd. Ought not more mercy and justice be expected from God?
BigSpoon19 2 years ago
Big Spoon:
Who are you to judge God. Thank about it.
ScarlettKnights 2 years ago
OK, I'll thank about it.
I'm not judging God, I'm judging your conception of God, which I find to be trite, idolatrous and ahistorical.
BigSpoon19 2 years ago
BigSpoon19:
Thank you for the laugh, you sound as snotty and full of yourself as Keith Olbermann. Perhaps you should apply for a job at MSNBC; lol Now keep that thesaurus close by; lol
ScarlettKnights 2 years ago
Good ad hom argument. I understand that when the words get too big, you have to lash out at somebody's education or attack them personally. It is tiresome, though...
BigSpoon19 2 years ago
Your education nor lack thereof was not attacked.
ScarlettKnights 2 years ago
Every religion has heard of Jesus. Every culture has heard of the God of the Bible. I was raised to be atheist. You say it is not judging God but then you say it is not just for the God of the Bible to act this way. This is a judgment. Justice is expected from God. All who have sinned have fallen from His glory. To not receive the payment for sin in the sacrifice of His only begotten Son is the ultimate rejection of mercy. God loves man and is pleading to you to receive such mercy.
GraceBibleFN 2 years ago
I've made a video about my problems with the notion of the sanctifying quality of Jesus' sacrifice.
Your arguments presuppose accepting your particular interpretation of scripture. That won't convince anybody who doesn't already accept that narrow interpretation.
I'm saying that I don't believe the particular interpretation you espouse because it is internally inconsistent. Your conception of God and your explanation of how he decides who is eternally damned is contradictory, in my opinion.
BigSpoon19 2 years ago
How is it just that God ought to expect a person raised in a Muslim or Hindu country to have the same chance of "accepting" Jesus as we do in the U.S.? Nobody asked to be born or to be born into their situation and to be condemned to eternal damnation because you were born in the wrong country simply doesn't make any sense. This is why, given the striking similarities amongst the world religions, it is much more consistent to consider the religions of the world as many paths to the same goal.
BigSpoon19 2 years ago
Big Spoon:
There are NOT striking similarities and if you notice only people who follow one religion have taken it upon themselves to try to murder all those who disagree with them.
ScarlettKnights 2 years ago
I assume you're talking about the Crusades or the Spanish Inquisition. Listen, I don't hold that against Christians in general and you shouldn't either. Those actions were certainly not indicative of the Christian Faith and fly in the face of Christian values. These events really represented specific historical and political conditions while religion was simply a rationalization.
BigSpoon19 2 years ago
BigSpoon: No, I'm speaking of Islamic terrorists today, but it would also be appropriate to speak of Islamic terrorists of the past as well, which were the reason for the Crusades. Also, what was mohammad but a war lord?
ScarlettKnights 2 years ago
Not that Islam has anything to do with this video or has any bearing on your argument except to divert attention from the point:
Is the Spanish Inquisition or the Crusaders' wholesale attempts to exterminate the Jews of Europe on their way to the holy land indicative of Christianity? So, why should I be convinced that so-called Muslim extremists are acting as good Muslims?
Please, tell me what "Islamic terrorism" spawned the Crusades. This ought to be entertaining.
BigSpoon19 2 years ago
BigSpoon19:
As you are apparently ignorant of history google this Islam's 1,000-Year Crusade
and entertain yourself.
ScarlettKnights 2 years ago
You don't get to cite a right-wing nutjob reclassification of history in making an argument. Just because some "historian" with an axe to grind decided to classify the political expansion of the various Islamic empires as a Crusade doesn't mean that that is at all convincing. Yes, Muslim kingdoms expanded and did so using military might, just like Christian ones did. Just because it helps your argument, you don't get to make a false-equivalency by comparing it to the Crusades.
BigSpoon19 2 years ago
How many times in the past two paragraphs have you satated : "You don't get to" Let me tell you something YOU DON'T HAVE THE RIGHT NOR MEANS TO TELL ME WHAT I MAY OR MAY NOT DO.
You may twist history in any way that fits your hateful worldview, you may wear your wife beater shirts and try to be a youtube version of Olbermann, knock yourself out and for that matter, spend your days w/ your trusty thesaurus, but know, that none of these actions help your backward theories.
ScarlettKnights 2 years ago
I THINK I SAID IT TWICE IN THE LAST PARAGRAPH.
I'm expressing to you why you don't get to make the arguments you are making and be convincing. Excuse the word choice. I don't know why you would choose to take that to mean that I was trying to control your actions...It seems as though you are really reaching here.
You are the one twisting history. Only in the extremely right-wing view of history does any idea of a "1000 year Muslim Crusade" exist. My ideas are pretty well-established fact.
BigSpoon19 2 years ago
Actually your theories are NOT "well-established" except by progressives who wish to rewrite history to suit their political ends.
Perhaps you have a reading problem here, I said the last two paragraphs. No matter, the point is that you have no right to tell me what I may or may not do. GET IT!
ScarlettKnights 2 years ago
Cite me a scholarly source for this 1000 year crusade interpretation. Just one.
Read my response before you respond. I clearly was not trying to control you. Stop diverting.
BigSpoon19 2 years ago
little spoon,
Do you own research; you have obviously done nothing w/ the first article I sent. I know this is a little game for you but it is a big waste of my time as there is nothing to gain but more insults from a control freak.
ScarlettKnights 2 years ago
What article? It's nit my responsibility to find sources that don't exist to support you arguments.
BigSpoon19 2 years ago
...cont.
And what, exactly, is "hateful" about my worldview? What is my worldview?
I mean, if you've been reduced to commenting on my clothing the discussion is in a pretty sad state. All you've done is divert attention from the original issue, and launch ad hom tirades about my shirt and my thesaurus (I really don't know what you're talking about there. Are you referring to my vocabulary? I don't even own a thesaurus).
BigSpoon19 2 years ago
Little Spoon:
Okay, you may point out a typing error on my part but accuse me of diverting attention if I mention your wearing a tacky wife beater; lol
Unless you are living in the distant past or enjoy cluttering your home with tools that are available on the Internet I'd not guess that you have a thesaurus in book form sitting in your pocket, oops sorry, wife beaters have no pockets; lol.
Your apologist and anti-Christian viewpoints are fairly obvious.
ScarlettKnights 2 years ago
LITTLE SPOON!! Hahaha!!
I corrected one of your several spelling errors as a poor attempt at humor. If that is horrible then I apologize. I then went on to address the substance of the comment. You have made a few comments on my clothing over two videos while running from the actual issue.
You clearly don't know what you are talking avout. I have made several videos defending Christianity and often argue with it's detractors in comments when they make arguments like you make here.
BigSpoon19 2 years ago
There is a difference between a typing error and spelling error but I know your game. Oh, look you made a little typing error "You clearly don't know what you are talking avout" or was that a spelling error?
Whatever, I sick of your insults and control freak nature. I'll spend the afternoon w/ an intelligent and respectful man, my husband. Bye Bye
ScarlettKnights 2 years ago
...cont.
In fact, that's my point. The Crusades were framed as a religious undertaking but I don't believe they were representative of true Christianity. You don't get to have it both ways. The Crusaders who massacred the population of Jerusalem weren't acting in the spirit of Christ, nor were the Inquisitors. Likewise, the Muslims who expanded in the Midieval Period and the modern extremists are acting for political reasons.
BigSpoon19 2 years ago
Yes Jesus is the only way
,but you and me must intercede for those we love and dont know Jesus yet,like Abrhaam did for hes nethew,he ask to God dont let Ló die in Sodoma,we must interceded for those we love too,for Jesus come to your lives!!!
BeneProductions 2 years ago
The most logical discussion I have heard on this subject. The only way to heaven is through Jesus. The only way, if anyone tells you otherwise he is atempting to decieve you, trust me
2setufree 2 years ago
Thanks friend.
GraceBibleFN 2 years ago