SLAMRAAM...Hell yeah. Program to evaluate the use of the AIM-120 in a surface launched configuration (hence the SL in the AMRAAM acronymn) to replace obsolete Hawk and more mobile than Patriot.
@Flash75able Sad that the Hawk was replaced by an inferior system. Too bad the Patriot end product deviated too far from it's origin, land based AEGIS using the SM2 and SM3 missiles.
@Robbob9933 Absolutely, coudn't agree more. HAWK was and is a good system, just got too old to maintain (wasn't cost efficient anymore). Too bad they couldn't just make new ones with updated blueprints and schematics.
@Flash75able They had to get rid of the HAWK becasue it kept making the Patriot look bad. The Marines 2ND LAAM kept impact killing high maneuver drones and Lance missiles. The Lance was the equivalant to the Russian FROG.
Negative. Although blue band indicates the warhead section is inert, do you really think they would use a live warhead just to check flight patterns to check rocket motors? Hit the pubs.
@onavianva Fair enough. I understand what you are getting at about the inert of the warhead section. However, there are always 2 'bands' on missiles of this type (9's, 7's, 120's). One band around the back of area of the missile (in this video the one closest to the camera) and one further up near about 1/3rd of the way back on the missile which goes around the warhead section. If the warhead is live, there would be a yellow band. If the rocket motor section was live, there would be a brown
@onavianva I have ripped enough of these damn things apart and put them back together to feel i know what I'm looking at. The concept is great. I hope it works well. The AMRAAM is a good reliable system. I would be willing to bet this is one of those "concept" videos where a lot of digital enhancement and extras were involved so they could have something "cool" to show the military.
Yes... those are certainly 120's. Used for air-to-air rolls. I guess they could be used in this set up. Only problem is, I have to raise the BS flag on this video. If you look at the video from the roof of the truck, anyone who has ever worked on munitions (US) knows that blue colored bands mean "inert". The warheads and rocket motors are not "real". So I can't say for sure about the one that was fired, but the rest of those missles on that truck are not going anywhere unless you throw it
@hankwvu "SLAMRAAM is a tailorable, state-of-the-art air defense system that can defeat current and emerging cruise missile threats and a wide range of air breathing threats. This affordable adaptation of the AMRAAM to meet emerging needs provides the warfighter with a system of highly mobile battlefield elements networked and geographically distributed to provide integrated fire control capability against airborne threats." It is also now mount on the FMTV.
Now, stop bickering who won WW2, though feel free to dump on obscure poo butt little countries that joined the allies AFTER it was clear Tojo and Adolf were in so much shit they needed snorkels.
yes they are old outdated by today standards. Though they could build up to date what the point really it'll take allot to up date em. The point is it for wwII and it was carriers that won navel battle their as today that why our navy pulled ahead and still leads too this day. Russia second. All other ships though themselves in front of carrier. As for the carrier's enemy that a sub which the German's again have the best one against carriers today.
Just jumped in here. What a moron, spouting all the garbage out of your filthy mind. With a handle like that you must be consumed by your hate for the USA! You are jealous of the United States of America. You know nothing of the military or wars. My guess is you are some 19 year old twerp.
Navy's will never be Obsolete lol. hell the U.S Navy is already talking about ship building in Space.
also the Bismark wasn't a Failure it was missed used. it should of had more escorts with it to help against enemy Aircraft instead of sending the damn thing on it's own.
@Trustisaliability 40% of russiaas war time supplys game from the USA, and im a brit and i know for a fact that we couldnt have kept them at bay for ever and without the US we couldnt have won the war , simple FACT
@Trustisaliability thats not the case either.what we in america are taught i that the ALLIES won the war.a joint effort between US,UK,CAN,FRA., and USSR. however to say that britain themselves could have defeat the nazi's is just as silly as saying that america won it by herself.
Posts here show how others are jealous of the USA superior military might. Also, they are jealous of our way of life. They would give their right arm to be in the USA for just one day!
Cut the chatter, WW II has already over. History wrote that the USSR who entered Berlin and found Hitler cremated body. History also told that Hitler's generals were unsure to attack USSR, although that time, 1942, German military was on their supreme power.
Nazi generals feared USSR not USA nor British!!!!!
Consider yourself lucky that Hitler was only a corporal during the WW I. He knows only ARMY, he doesn't know the important things about NAVY or AIR FORCE.
To beat the British, you doesn't have to make an amphibious assault, you just have to cut their logistic on Atlantic ocean. The British will die or surrender b'coz of starvation.
the raf did do a good job but u cant say that we didnt help an enormous part the whole french liberation had a large part to do with america your name should be francercowards the rolled over and got ass fucked by the wermacht
They were also the first to lose it twice. USA did very little during both WW's, basically they showed up when it best suited them.
Yeah france was so useful in the war, especially the Vicci's oh man totally help win the war.
The winner of WWII was general winter of the very fucking cold northern Russia. Like with Napoleon, he was underestimated and a combination of him and some persistent Ruskies annihilated another European tyrant
French were not cowards. Did they not boldly come out from behind the hedge after the Germans were gone and wreak vengence on thousands of teanage girls who were silly enough to fall for German soldiers? Oh how those brave frenchmen bravely stripped them naked in the streets and shaved those poor kids heads.
The French did the right thing and kept their heads down ..... who the f*** would want them on their side anyway?
the turn of the war was indeed stalingrad the germans lost so much it was a morale blow too tho the western front has been kind of propagandized as the american heroes through band of bros and saving private ryan
OK, Actually you are wrong. If the US was protecting only its own interest, we would have never been involved in the European theater, only the Pacific. So without the USA, you would be speaking Germany with a Red Flag on your house
That may be true in some cases, but Raytheon is a defense company. The weapons that they make are used only for defense purposes. They are used to take other missles out of the sky, not to kill people. Maybe do some research before you post comments that make absolutely no sense.
To all other Americans here, What you may have done during the world war II does not justify your actions of today.
And in my point of view you where just protecting your own intrests when you sided with us during the WW2, after pearl harbor you saved yourselves as much as us when you participated in the war against the axis power.
as you say that on a global network devised by the american MIC, using an operating system invented by an american company. For our next amazing gift to humanity we'll develope a BMD system that will help keep all of our allies safe from thermonucluar annihlation. Ur welcome. Fuck off.
seemed to work for england for long enough. I sleep like a baby. the people we fight, they'll kill you with rockets and bombs just as quick. then go and hide up in the mountains. where our predators find them.
Your last goverment lied to you about 9/11, and they used that to start the war in Iraq, your goverment started an invasion that was illegal to begin with.
they acted against FN orders.
Doing so on illusions and false evidence about nuclear weapons.
If the US did...WHY THE FUCK DID BIN LADEN ADMIT TO IT?!
And if it was an "illegal" invasion...WHY DID NO ONE STOP IT?! AND WHY ARE OTHER NATIONS HELPING?! There was no acting against FN orders...if so there would be many countries fighting the US right now.
Aside from all that...9/11 has nothing to do with Iraq...ONLY AFGHANISTAN.
Now that Saddam is dead thewar should be over...BUT BOW PEOPLE ARE MURDERING EACHOTHER THROUGH GENOCIDE
You are asking yourself why we aren't fighting the states.
Two things mainly, we aren't your parents so we shouldn't have to discipline you.
Secondly, as you pointed out some countries did help (UK ...) and that puts us in a awkward position, we must after all first discipline our own before we take care of you.
And why should the war be over? Because you want it to be?
Or maybe, just maybe you might realise that you did wrong, this is not what they wanted.
These cooperations don't care about civilian casualties, they are the warmongers. If there are no war present, then they will make one. They earn millions at the cost of human lives from both the sides of the war, many of the weapons that your own country produces are sold to the highest bidder, and that are the ones you will be fighting against later on in a approximate future.
I guess...:/ if you have to look at it from my point of view. I live in a huge country with a huge military that controls the free world. the UK is like a state with a really tough millitia compared to us. So...yeah, im unimpressed.
you fuckin thick ,stupid ,arrogant bellicose twats you yanks aint got a fuckin clue, if america fell into a bucket of tits it would come out sucking its thumb! you are unbelievably stupid..
What the fuck is great about your smelly grey-skied rainy uneducated gap-toothed pansy motherfucking bullshit queer island?
Ya know, there's a reason every last person in the world knows our leaders name, along with their own leader's, and that's it. Because WE'RE THE ONLY ONES THAT MATTER.
please, we saved you ass in world war two, and you fucing lost the revolutionary war. Ghandi fucking kicked you out of india without one bullet fired. America could take over all of england anytime. Hey, at least we have meat here unlike whatever you eat.
Hardhouse ppl - that and 4beat my american fellas, try raving out till 9 .
We created america and as such will look down upone you as inferior to ourselves. you have no sense of humur , low grade music , crime , fat bastards , thick bastards , bastards , no fish n' chips , no yorkshire's , no teleys , no queen, no earl grey , no pubs , no escort cosworths , no nice ale/larger/beer and no cheese ...........andy whitby - 'rokk ya body'- chek it out ppl - ........................open your mind...
you fucking British twats if you think your so fucking special why don't you try to take the U.S.A. back i would love take some shots at you limie bastards we in america use your flag as a shit rag Alaska is bigger then your whole fucking country with out us you would not have the weapons to defend your puny shit hole of a country GOD FUCK THE QUEEN we have the best air force, navy, army just give us a reason and we will fuck your and country oorah
ha you fought 1 war we fought 2 wars in one wwII made us a super power. Plus the Yamato battle ship's put the Bismark too shame the Zero was better then any German plan out and only Canada help the U.S. Allso we lost half of our fleet and all battleships in that ocean. SO don't hand me Britain did as much. Though you were our strongest Allie in that part of wwII. Though we were un beat after that war as we only Owen than A-bomb till Russians made them a few years latter.
woo Bismark, made by the best to be the best. A big boat was made, but like the US and USSR arm's race it didn't accomplish much. Pretty much a waste of time and resources
Heaviest battle ship, yes. I would rather have 3 regular battleships than one super ship because I could attack three different areas at once, also if one ship got sunk, I'd have two replacements. With the bismark, oh we have biggest ship... and now it's sunk and we can't really afford to make bismark 2.0. Damn.
yeah it's twice as thick armor or those 19 ich guns. don't need rang with all those island around. they made too pearl harbor just fine escorting those carrier. Oh yeah and their was 2 of them only 1 Bismark with a captain scared of his own shadow.
you fuckin thick ,stupid ,arrogant bellicose twats you yanks aint got a fuckin clue, if america fell into a bucket of tits it would come out sucking its thumb! you are unbelievably stupid..
Those are modified AMRAAMS. They have active radar guidance, but even then they would need a tracking radar. This means that they need an external radar source to feed targeting information to the truck.
That explains the missing ducks.
MrUnclestupidhead 5 months ago
WTF !!! Reminds me of the ride equipped with RPG7s in Death Race !!!
MrPhantomFury 7 months ago
imagin misfire at 0:04
eggplantparrot 10 months ago
American weapon.. how much for 1 missile? 2 billions? lol
U378U 1 year ago
SLAMRAAM...Hell yeah. Program to evaluate the use of the AIM-120 in a surface launched configuration (hence the SL in the AMRAAM acronymn) to replace obsolete Hawk and more mobile than Patriot.
Flash75able 1 year ago
@Flash75able Sad that the Hawk was replaced by an inferior system. Too bad the Patriot end product deviated too far from it's origin, land based AEGIS using the SM2 and SM3 missiles.
Robbob9933 8 months ago
@Robbob9933 Absolutely, coudn't agree more. HAWK was and is a good system, just got too old to maintain (wasn't cost efficient anymore). Too bad they couldn't just make new ones with updated blueprints and schematics.
Flash75able 8 months ago
@Flash75able They had to get rid of the HAWK becasue it kept making the Patriot look bad. The Marines 2ND LAAM kept impact killing high maneuver drones and Lance missiles. The Lance was the equivalant to the Russian FROG.
Robbob9933 8 months ago
Negative. Although blue band indicates the warhead section is inert, do you really think they would use a live warhead just to check flight patterns to check rocket motors? Hit the pubs.
NATM
Special purpose air training guided missile
Nuff said
onavianva 1 year ago
@onavianva Fair enough. I understand what you are getting at about the inert of the warhead section. However, there are always 2 'bands' on missiles of this type (9's, 7's, 120's). One band around the back of area of the missile (in this video the one closest to the camera) and one further up near about 1/3rd of the way back on the missile which goes around the warhead section. If the warhead is live, there would be a yellow band. If the rocket motor section was live, there would be a brown
hankwvu 1 year ago
@onavianva I have ripped enough of these damn things apart and put them back together to feel i know what I'm looking at. The concept is great. I hope it works well. The AMRAAM is a good reliable system. I would be willing to bet this is one of those "concept" videos where a lot of digital enhancement and extras were involved so they could have something "cool" to show the military.
hankwvu 1 year ago
Yes... those are certainly 120's. Used for air-to-air rolls. I guess they could be used in this set up. Only problem is, I have to raise the BS flag on this video. If you look at the video from the roof of the truck, anyone who has ever worked on munitions (US) knows that blue colored bands mean "inert". The warheads and rocket motors are not "real". So I can't say for sure about the one that was fired, but the rest of those missles on that truck are not going anywhere unless you throw it
hankwvu 1 year ago
@hankwvu "SLAMRAAM is a tailorable, state-of-the-art air defense system that can defeat current and emerging cruise missile threats and a wide range of air breathing threats. This affordable adaptation of the AMRAAM to meet emerging needs provides the warfighter with a system of highly mobile battlefield elements networked and geographically distributed to provide integrated fire control capability against airborne threats." It is also now mount on the FMTV.
Flash75able 1 year ago
Looks like something from a James Bond movie!
Now, stop bickering who won WW2, though feel free to dump on obscure poo butt little countries that joined the allies AFTER it was clear Tojo and Adolf were in so much shit they needed snorkels.
KG84C 1 year ago 7
where is the radar ? and the other staff
007sofian 1 year ago
My uncle works at Raytheon
Airrage88 1 year ago
the prob iraqies still fuckin americans like the vets used to do american just wankers try to show power
jordanboyaussie 2 years ago
Where is radar in hammer ?
Xzandon 1 year ago
yes, where is the guidance radar and the detection radar???
95predator 1 year ago
those are AMRAAMs but moded for be SAMs, they got the target from a radar not in the humvee ... maybe IDK an awacs ?
leonelp51 1 year ago
@jordanboyaussie speak english!
shoobee101 1 year ago
So what are those missiles for?
bloodz1311 2 years ago
Killing iraqies
dominiccss 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
As opposed to USA's Iowa class batteships which was built later than the Bismark and as heavy as fast, but with less aircraft and less big guns guns.
Great 1 babyeatsdingos
USArCOWARDS 2 years ago
I'm not an expert on naval warfare nor would I wish to be. Navies are becoming obsolete with current and future technology.
1. Who gives a shit about the Iowa class battleships? And who besides you mentioned them in our discourse?
2. I actually don't have a middle name.
3. The Bismark was a complete failure. Wow a super weapon, but one that other countries could easily make for themselves.
4. You spout outdated facts like they mean something.
babyeatsdingos 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Youre country shithole USA built Iowa battleships just like Bismark.
The Bismark a failure?
How can you say that?
It destroyed the former largest ship in the world and flag ship of Great Britain.
How can other countries build them on their own.
Todays ships are stealth with things like Hongniao nuclear missiles.
Clearly youre the 1 spurting outdated facts.
USArCOWARDS 2 years ago
yes they are old outdated by today standards. Though they could build up to date what the point really it'll take allot to up date em. The point is it for wwII and it was carriers that won navel battle their as today that why our navy pulled ahead and still leads too this day. Russia second. All other ships though themselves in front of carrier. As for the carrier's enemy that a sub which the German's again have the best one against carriers today.
starknight97 2 years ago
Just jumped in here. What a moron, spouting all the garbage out of your filthy mind. With a handle like that you must be consumed by your hate for the USA! You are jealous of the United States of America. You know nothing of the military or wars. My guess is you are some 19 year old twerp.
zeke1312 2 years ago
Navy's will never be Obsolete lol. hell the U.S Navy is already talking about ship building in Space.
also the Bismark wasn't a Failure it was missed used. it should of had more escorts with it to help against enemy Aircraft instead of sending the damn thing on it's own.
Dogmeat1950 2 years ago
Comment removed
MokomaSusi 2 years ago 14
@MokomaSusi
Britain could have kept the Germans off our islands for ever, we just would have run out of food.
The Russians could have won on their own though.
Trustisaliability 1 year ago
@Trustisaliability 40% of russiaas war time supplys game from the USA, and im a brit and i know for a fact that we couldnt have kept them at bay for ever and without the US we couldnt have won the war , simple FACT
midgert 1 year ago
@midgert
They still had the manpower.
We only needed the Americans for food supplies, we won the battle of Britain and we held them off in North Africa.
Sure the Americans helped a lot, but they did not "win" World War 2. (By themselves as they arrogantly claim)
Trustisaliability 1 year ago
@Trustisaliability thats not the case either.what we in america are taught i that the ALLIES won the war.a joint effort between US,UK,CAN,FRA., and USSR. however to say that britain themselves could have defeat the nazi's is just as silly as saying that america won it by herself.
shoobee101 1 year ago
@shoobee101
I never said that. Its good to see an enlightened American :D
Trustisaliability 1 year ago
@Trustisaliability touch'e! also,i forgot to add the kiwi's and aussie's
shoobee101 1 year ago
Comment removed
concretehall 1 year ago
@MokomaSusi supply from CANADA...... read you're history book properly....
hotrod525 1 year ago
Posts here show how others are jealous of the USA superior military might. Also, they are jealous of our way of life. They would give their right arm to be in the USA for just one day!
zeke1312 2 years ago
Sure.
mandingocaribe 2 years ago
Yeah your totally right..
gunnemdown357 2 years ago
USArCOWARD,
Cut the chatter, WW II has already over. History wrote that the USSR who entered Berlin and found Hitler cremated body. History also told that Hitler's generals were unsure to attack USSR, although that time, 1942, German military was on their supreme power.
Nazi generals feared USSR not USA nor British!!!!!
77837682 2 years ago
USArCOWARDS,
You mean the "The Battle of Britain"?
Consider yourself lucky that Hitler was only a corporal during the WW I. He knows only ARMY, he doesn't know the important things about NAVY or AIR FORCE.
To beat the British, you doesn't have to make an amphibious assault, you just have to cut their logistic on Atlantic ocean. The British will die or surrender b'coz of starvation.
77837682 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
77837682,
"Cut the logistic on the Atlanic Ocean?"
Think you'll find he tried that and failed.
USArCOWARDS 2 years ago
Yup, i agree with Necromundi, The eastern front was the real WW II. The Nazi gave their best soldier to deal with the Red Army.
Nazi were losing the war not b'coz of the allied advance, but b'coz of the Soviet massive attack.
77837682 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
77837682,
Eastern front my arse.
Goring sent the tire luatwaffe against Britisn killig thousands.
"His own quote:
"IF WE LOSE NOW THEY'LL
RIP OUT OUR ARSE HOLES"
And the RAF did.
USArCOWARDS 2 years ago
the raf did do a good job but u cant say that we didnt help an enormous part the whole french liberation had a large part to do with america your name should be francercowards the rolled over and got ass fucked by the wermacht
hockey6tx 2 years ago 8
This comment has received too many negative votes show
hockey6tx,
French liberation?
Last i checked Britain liberated the 1st house in france and the French military beat USA to paris to liberate it.
Dont cry yank
USArCOWARDS 2 years ago
They were also the first to lose it twice. USA did very little during both WW's, basically they showed up when it best suited them.
Yeah france was so useful in the war, especially the Vicci's oh man totally help win the war.
The winner of WWII was general winter of the very fucking cold northern Russia. Like with Napoleon, he was underestimated and a combination of him and some persistent Ruskies annihilated another European tyrant
babyeatsdingos 2 years ago
@hockey6tx
French were not cowards. Did they not boldly come out from behind the hedge after the Germans were gone and wreak vengence on thousands of teanage girls who were silly enough to fall for German soldiers? Oh how those brave frenchmen bravely stripped them naked in the streets and shaved those poor kids heads.
The French did the right thing and kept their heads down ..... who the f*** would want them on their side anyway?
tpsossff 1 year ago
the turn of the war was indeed stalingrad the germans lost so much it was a morale blow too tho the western front has been kind of propagandized as the american heroes through band of bros and saving private ryan
hockey6tx 2 years ago
Shut. The. Fuck. Up. Necromundi. You're a complete waste of bandwidth.
roguespear91 2 years ago
OK, Actually you are wrong. If the US was protecting only its own interest, we would have never been involved in the European theater, only the Pacific. So without the USA, you would be speaking Germany with a Red Flag on your house
duke00895 2 years ago
bullshit we could of done fine without you stop being so cocky and arrogant
hbkfitz 2 years ago
amraam missile¿
20DJPURO09 2 years ago
That may be true in some cases, but Raytheon is a defense company. The weapons that they make are used only for defense purposes. They are used to take other missles out of the sky, not to kill people. Maybe do some research before you post comments that make absolutely no sense.
ma13245 2 years ago
Yes, its a defence company. Might i ask you why a civilian company is allowed to be the ones to take care about your weaponry?
And one of americans no.1 quotes would be "a best defence is a good offence".
And saying Raytheon only makes defences would be a awkward lie.
They make bunker-busting warheads, unmanned combat aircrafts and microwave weaponry.
The last named weaponry is planned to be used to subdue crowds as in protesters and alike.
These people would be you when you realise the truth
Necromundi 2 years ago
To all other Americans here, What you may have done during the world war II does not justify your actions of today.
And in my point of view you where just protecting your own intrests when you sided with us during the WW2, after pearl harbor you saved yourselves as much as us when you participated in the war against the axis power.
Necromundi 2 years ago
as you say that on a global network devised by the american MIC, using an operating system invented by an american company. For our next amazing gift to humanity we'll develope a BMD system that will help keep all of our allies safe from thermonucluar annihlation. Ur welcome. Fuck off.
Jovian84 2 years ago
quite a powerful comment. Im impressed
cambruda 2 years ago
I supose it could be, if he skipped F-words etc.
And more importantly, if what he said had anything to do with my comment.
Necromundi 2 years ago
Im not very intrested in defences that US makes against their own nuclear warheads
Im talking about how you behave as if you can do actions to day that those who realy fought in the WW2 would never justify.
Necromundi 2 years ago
the weilder of the weapons defends their own sanity by accepting any lie that removes them of the blame.
Necromundi 2 years ago
seemed to work for england for long enough. I sleep like a baby. the people we fight, they'll kill you with rockets and bombs just as quick. then go and hide up in the mountains. where our predators find them.
Jovian84 2 years ago
What are you doing within their rockets and bombs range?
WHY are you in their country to begin with?
Necromundi 2 years ago
You really need to get past YOUR illusions and see the reality of it all
cambruda 2 years ago
Can't you use your own words instead of just reading mine, and then turn some part of my statement into something attacking my etos?
Necromundi 2 years ago
And what are those lies? Tell me...im dying to hear. Perhaps what you call lies is really just you lying to yourself to believe what you want...
cambruda 2 years ago
Am i allowed to give ANY example?
Ok, fair enough.
Your last goverment lied to you about 9/11, and they used that to start the war in Iraq, your goverment started an invasion that was illegal to begin with.
they acted against FN orders.
Doing so on illusions and false evidence about nuclear weapons.
Necromundi 2 years ago
Thats a bullshit excuse that the US framed 9/11.
If the US did...WHY THE FUCK DID BIN LADEN ADMIT TO IT?!
And if it was an "illegal" invasion...WHY DID NO ONE STOP IT?! AND WHY ARE OTHER NATIONS HELPING?! There was no acting against FN orders...if so there would be many countries fighting the US right now.
Aside from all that...9/11 has nothing to do with Iraq...ONLY AFGHANISTAN.
Now that Saddam is dead thewar should be over...BUT BOW PEOPLE ARE MURDERING EACHOTHER THROUGH GENOCIDE
cambruda 2 years ago
Wo said anything about being framed?
I said you have been lied to, thats all.
And no, before you swallow yet another bait.
You should know that 9/11 was a terrorist attack, it was not one country attacking another.
It was a few individuals not a nation.
And you say that saddam is dead, ya he is.
May i ask why? You just said 9/11 had nothing to do with Iraq.
And btw, Saddam was trained and placed into power by the us goverment.
Necromundi 2 years ago
And it was an illegal invasion.
You are asking yourself why we aren't fighting the states.
Two things mainly, we aren't your parents so we shouldn't have to discipline you.
Secondly, as you pointed out some countries did help (UK ...) and that puts us in a awkward position, we must after all first discipline our own before we take care of you.
And why should the war be over? Because you want it to be?
Or maybe, just maybe you might realise that you did wrong, this is not what they wanted.
Necromundi 2 years ago
you need to shut the fuck up. You're an extremist that only causes anything and everything to become worse than it already is
cambruda 2 years ago
Comment removed
Necromundi 2 years ago
Cambruda will you stop using caps, it doesn't make your statements more true, only more childish and ignorant.
Necromundi 2 years ago
And i also noted somwthing in your post, you didn't reply on my comment about the false evidence.
I would realy want you to do that aswell while your at it.
It will be interesting how you explain that.
Necromundi 2 years ago
9/11 wasnt framed but the invasions was illegal
hbkfitz 2 years ago
it was
elar55 2 years ago
If you try to deny that you live in a country that is govern by your military industrial complex, then you are a fool.
Even if you chose not to belive me, belive your former president Eisenhower.
USA:s wars are now soley based around profit, not for the nation in it self but for the cooperations in the military industrial complex.
Necromundi 2 years ago
As goes for ANY nation on the planet...good military= good profit. Dont blame any particular nation when in fact EVERY nation does it
cambruda 2 years ago
Actually thats just a untrue statement.
I'm from Sweden, our military is more of a tradition that for a war purpose.
We haven't had a single war in over 200 years.
And if you look into the history, all empires that have a large standing army WILL fall.
Necromundi 2 years ago
These cooperations don't care about civilian casualties, they are the warmongers. If there are no war present, then they will make one. They earn millions at the cost of human lives from both the sides of the war, many of the weapons that your own country produces are sold to the highest bidder, and that are the ones you will be fighting against later on in a approximate future.
Necromundi 2 years ago
danm that rocket almmost hit me
13perrycody 2 years ago
liek buk m1
95predator 2 years ago
LoL aalltteerrnn8 ur so fucking ingnorant it's funny
ericltd88 2 years ago
@ericltd88 I'm eating Fish 'n' Chips right now .... I think this settles the UK/US debate
aalltteerrnn8 1 year ago
Raytheon is the capitalist militiaristic killing machine of the US. The missles kill many innocent people each day
derrylad 2 years ago
Says the Irish terrorist.
roguespear91 2 years ago
the weilder of the weapons defends their own sanity by accepting any lie that removes them of the blame.
If you try to deny that you live in a country that is govern by your military industrial complex, then you are a fool.
Even if you chose not to belive me, belive your former president Eisenhower.
USA:s wars are now soley based around profit, not for the nation in it self but for the cooperations in the military industrial complex.
Necromundi 2 years ago
please... shoot 10000 missiles to my school.
koreachinajapan 3 years ago
no es peligroso llebar al descubierto este tipo de misiles o sea un disparo y fue camion
janopunk 3 years ago
what kind of missiles are those?
draadstaal33 3 years ago
i think it's a HMRAAM (pronounced Hum-RAM, though i'm sure i misspelled it)
Those are AMRAAM (aim 120) missiles.
russcarljohnson 3 years ago
THE UK RULES!
Georgestuffs 3 years ago
Raytheon is american, genius.
FacultyFan 3 years ago 4
UK still rules xD
228Ghost228 3 years ago
I guess...:/ if you have to look at it from my point of view. I live in a huge country with a huge military that controls the free world. the UK is like a state with a really tough millitia compared to us. So...yeah, im unimpressed.
FacultyFan 3 years ago
you fuckin thick ,stupid ,arrogant bellicose twats you yanks aint got a fuckin clue, if america fell into a bucket of tits it would come out sucking its thumb! you are unbelievably stupid..
D1rec7or 3 years ago
you have something to conetest what I said? or are just so pissed that I dissed your pathetic little island?
FacultyFan 3 years ago
Haha director got pwnt.
The uk is such a stupid shithole.
You call us arrogant you dumb twat?
Who's the one calling their place GREAT Britain.
What the fuck is great about your smelly grey-skied rainy uneducated gap-toothed pansy motherfucking bullshit queer island?
Ya know, there's a reason every last person in the world knows our leaders name, along with their own leader's, and that's it. Because WE'RE THE ONLY ONES THAT MATTER.
Oh yeah, bitch. I just went there.
4cellar2door0 2 years ago
like I said, if america fell into a bucket of tits it would come out sucking its thumb!
The Great British Empire owns you, noob. Now go finish off that greasy stfu-burger you fat, moronic twat.
The only place you went to was Mc Donalds, you fat cunt.
D1rec7or 2 years ago
please, we saved you ass in world war two, and you fucing lost the revolutionary war. Ghandi fucking kicked you out of india without one bullet fired. America could take over all of england anytime. Hey, at least we have meat here unlike whatever you eat.
famousshooter98 2 years ago
Hardhouse ppl - that and 4beat my american fellas, try raving out till 9 .
We created america and as such will look down upone you as inferior to ourselves. you have no sense of humur , low grade music , crime , fat bastards , thick bastards , bastards , no fish n' chips , no yorkshire's , no teleys , no queen, no earl grey , no pubs , no escort cosworths , no nice ale/larger/beer and no cheese ...........andy whitby - 'rokk ya body'- chek it out ppl - ........................open your mind...
aalltteerrnn8 2 years ago
you fucking British twats if you think your so fucking special why don't you try to take the U.S.A. back i would love take some shots at you limie bastards we in america use your flag as a shit rag Alaska is bigger then your whole fucking country with out us you would not have the weapons to defend your puny shit hole of a country GOD FUCK THE QUEEN we have the best air force, navy, army just give us a reason and we will fuck your and country oorah
iceman27406 2 years ago
calm down honey
RoXoRzzz 2 years ago
@iceman27406 Trolling idiot, what are you on about? The weapons to defend? Idiot.
MrMorg19 10 months ago
Shooter98, your comment are so wrong on so many things.
You didn't save us in the WW2, you mearly contributed.
I'm not saying that Britan did alot more, but they did put some constant pressure on the Germans.
But truth to be told, Sovjet did most of the work.
Necromundi 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Necromundi,
Britain clearly did much more.
USA got bombed once at pearl harbour and its entire military needed 12 months to recover and launch and attack.
While the British empire was bombed daily.
Rangoon was leveled by over 100 bombing raids. Yet still had its military in the fight.
USArCOWARDS 2 years ago
lol canada joined the day it was declared in both wars and it took uncle sam that long hahahahahahahahahaha
hbkfitz 2 years ago
ha you fought 1 war we fought 2 wars in one wwII made us a super power. Plus the Yamato battle ship's put the Bismark too shame the Zero was better then any German plan out and only Canada help the U.S. Allso we lost half of our fleet and all battleships in that ocean. SO don't hand me Britain did as much. Though you were our strongest Allie in that part of wwII. Though we were un beat after that war as we only Owen than A-bomb till Russians made them a few years latter.
igorbabyeater 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Yeah thats right.
The Yamatos weaker engine,slower speed and shorter range makes it far better than the Bismark.
USArCOWARDS 2 years ago
woo Bismark, made by the best to be the best. A big boat was made, but like the US and USSR arm's race it didn't accomplish much. Pretty much a waste of time and resources
babyeatsdingos 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
How do you figure that Mr expert?
The Bismark was the heaviest battleship in the world when it was launched.
USArCOWARDS 2 years ago
Heaviest battle ship, yes. I would rather have 3 regular battleships than one super ship because I could attack three different areas at once, also if one ship got sunk, I'd have two replacements. With the bismark, oh we have biggest ship... and now it's sunk and we can't really afford to make bismark 2.0. Damn.
babyeatsdingos 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
babyeatsdingos whats funny about that is youre a yank.
Youre middle name is Mr jumbo sized.
And the Germans tried small boats in WW1 and that didnt work either Mr expert on naval warfare.
USArCOWARDS 2 years ago
I would rather have a Aircraft Carrier then a Battleship, cause Carriers own every thing. :)
Dogmeat1950 2 years ago
yeah it's twice as thick armor or those 19 ich guns. don't need rang with all those island around. they made too pearl harbor just fine escorting those carrier. Oh yeah and their was 2 of them only 1 Bismark with a captain scared of his own shadow.
starknight97 2 years ago
You can say that over and over, it's not going to make it true. You socialist pig fucker.
roguespear91 2 years ago
you fuckin thick ,stupid ,arrogant bellicose twats you yanks aint got a fuckin clue, if america fell into a bucket of tits it would come out sucking its thumb! you are unbelievably stupid..
D1rec7or 2 years ago
First of all, he might be a bit angry, but that is to be expected, but seriusly, he is right on some notes.
Europe did create the todays America.
Necromundi 2 years ago
No real need for me to say whats wrong about this comment, its just out of order.
Necromundi 2 years ago
FacultyFan, are you sure you want to be saying:
"a huge military that controls the free world"
A free world could surely not be controled by a military power and stay free.
Necromundi 2 years ago
That is true, and im happy that it is american, I surely don't want anything to do with them.
Necromundi 2 years ago
where is the sound?
stg44rulz 3 years ago
thats just a sparrow, where is the radar?
gosciu555 3 years ago
Those are modified AMRAAMS. They have active radar guidance, but even then they would need a tracking radar. This means that they need an external radar source to feed targeting information to the truck.
f38stingray 2 years ago
shit
pmopmo4824 4 years ago
Yeah that is the last thing the pilot says when one of these locks on...
CroakerMD 3 years ago
Hell Yeah!
SlyManPX 3 years ago