Added: 2 years ago
From: anandaadhar
Views: 3,832
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (47)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • maybe your setup on this scale has too much friction to let it go longer...

    but i agree there is no perpetuum mobile in here...

    not this way...

    I do think there must be some way though to tap into the seemingly endless energy of magnets...

    If annyone ever really finds a way this would solve the world energy problems totally...

    in the end there is a 'balance' situation in this setup...

    the same balance magnets themselves have...

    a + and a - that eliminate eachother...

  • @MrLunk2 CONTINUED:

    there is just as much negative magnetic energy as positive magnetic energy...

    Thats why there cannot and never will be a contiunous motion.

  • @MrLunk2 especially not in a non-vacuum situation and with any kind of bearing where even the slightest friction is applied.

    thus in space it will keep spinning...

    but then again...

    you dont need magnets there to keep a disk spinning once its got an initial force applied to it ;)

    getting energy out of a balance is just not logic ;)

    green greetz,

    MrLunk DOT Tk

  • It's like a clock. :D Gives of it's energy over a long time. Wished we had a good or even a over-unity solution that really works.

  • Sooner or later every thing will come to and end. The object is to make something last as long as you can. hopefully You can make something last for 100's of years.

  • Goed bezig !

    Groetjes, iT

  • dont give up look at this video projectsnowflake.

  • great choice of music!

  • says more than a thousand words...

  • There is also a Japanese version, the Minato wheel replication, a japanese Mylow

    watch?v=dvlDEqf2pCc&feature=re­lated

    (slows down likewise, no perpetual motion)

  • When will you show your 3rd video? I have watched all my stand up comedy DVD's, my humorous movies. I need something new to laugh about.

  • The fun is over as far as I am concerned.

  • did you try to angle the magnets like the perendev motor?

  • The Perendev-type of Jhonson mortor has been extensively tested, but no sign of overunity has been found.

  • when are you going to release version 3, which ofcourse is not going to work

  • Listen, I am very clear in this video: I personally don't believe in the Johnson concept. I think a second force like gravity should be involved. See my Finsrud analysis where I demonstrate this in an experiment.

  • everything in hj motor is based on the ''gate'' you must either force it open upon entering or force it open upon exiting...the trick is to get it to open...hj found out how...and it seems hidden to all of you...

  • You mentioned that you understand the importance of the flywheel. Indeed, the flywheel stores energy as a moving mass. You can also call it rotational energy.

    When you push the flywheel, the magnets push and pull on the flywheel. That is actual measurable magnetic energy in action. The top of the hill is actually a state of maximum magnetic potential energy. If you ignore friction, the energy you put in the wheel-magnet system will remain constant.

  • As the wheel turns it also goes up and down in speed, when it is slowing down it is giving up its rotational energy and transforming it into magnetic potential energy. At any point or at any time, you can add up the measured magnetic and rotational energy and they will sum to the same value. If you can visualize this, the rotational and magnetic energy are in a kind of dance with each other, transforming back and forth.

  • There is noting abstract about the magnetic potential energy, you can feel the force from it with your finger. As you push the week with your finger, the force times the displacement is the magnetic potential energy.

    We know from science and from experiments that the "up hills" and the "down hills" cancel each other out as you go around the circle, no matter what the magnet configuration.

    Anyway, if you can visualize the "dance" in your mind, and then add friction, the energy goes down ->heat.

  • The question is whether this dance you speak of will also happen with gravity pulses. Finsrud suggests that this is not the case with a double pendulum setup over a chaos array of magnets added to the inertial movement of a running steel ball. What now would be the correct experimental setup to prove this?

  • anandaadhar...I must reveal to you in confidence that ethically I already know of a system quietly proven by a respected one here in u.s.a. that has already achieved closed loop continuous motion thru gravity, magnetism, speed(time)...

  • I say this to you with reservations for I am greedy and jealous to be the first to gain the glory one would have if such a system became public in our own reality...so I offer you only the hope I must do as a minimum to give you a chance to beat me in my quest thru your own effort...if there was another way I would help you more...

  • but you are to honest and if I told you more you would give it away as I should...I wish you luck...your words: (we know howard but we don't know how)...we know mylow but we cant get high...if we all knew paul we would have both now...manwar999

  • Thanks for telling me that there is this way with gravity. You speak in mysteries though, I reason from the Finsrud example. What is it that you have laid your hands upon? You can't tell me because you are too jealous and greedy and I am to(o) honest and would give it away? I really can't follow you here.

    Remember that it are the losers who want to win, the winners just want to continue with what they do trusting the law of fulfillment: you automatically attain what you want meeting conditions.

  • So you are stopping experiments on Howards that you know is possible just because. Well, i will be sorry for you, big time loser. You find out that Mylow might be a faker, so what? Howard was not. Got it? So let keep this clear and if you were just a little wiser would never take conclusions on your failings or Mylows, should stay quiet and learn previous lessons and just start over and over again choosing a different path each time. Thats the way ... ciao

  • Tip: that conclusions on sucessful events

  • "Tip: that conclusions on sucessful events "

    That's a totally idiotic statement. It says that you will only believe what you want to believe. The experiment WAS successful, and proved that this configuration did not produce any energy. It leads to the following hypothesis: No similar configuration will produce energy.

    That me being a good guy and standing up for the truth so that people reading this have a balanced view. What I say can be backed up with differential equations.

  • Blueskyh2o, take a hike.  Anandaadhar is a great experimenter and honestly interprets his data and comes to the proper conclusions. Yet he remains optimistic and wants to continue along other avenues.

    Howard appears to be another myth from what I can see, complete with the Mylowesque "mysteriously stolen motors".

    Screw you with your "stay quiet". I am one of the good guys, defending what's right, you are a "believer", possibly with no science background. Such is life.

  • I pursue the example of Finsrud. I can see that thing wortking, not Johnson's. So Fnsrud comes first. Nevertheless indeed some concept of Johnsons way might work.

  • you know we know its possible...therefore i spit upon you all that try to place stumbling blocks in front of those who seek the truth...even mylow is trying in his own way to help our movement...and you parasites who cripple the world will soon suffer great stripes for your deeds...selah

  • Thanks for your support, but spare me the spite towards the cynics. It is useless. I prefer to stick to the constructive approach as you do. Lots of the negativity is nothing but concealed indolence. It is the symptom of materialism and the collective cultural neurosis of standard time ulterior motives. Only really trying will give results.

  • I will give you 1000 euros of you get this thing running for 10 minutes. You can't!

    Get a job man!

  • Thanks for the offer, but I just argued in this video that this thing to my opion will not run. That was the purpose of my replication attempt. It is not my ego thing. It is my job to do research and report. And maybe I will also report about people like you as an example of sic and disrespectful cynicism as a function the cultural neurosis we are caught in with standard time. Try someone else for your bets.

  • Mylow faked his vids buddy. !!

  • Just read the other comments please....I know that.

  • Blueskyh2o...they say there are two sides to every story...i say in this case there might be a truth before and then a truth after...something dont seem right for sure we shall keep waching...

    Blueskyh2o So glass table was faked..but was all videos faked? Whats the all truth and nothing but the truth? Can be all explained on fish lines? Its smells fishy all the way, both ways...

  • There are several video which show that this is all fake! Even mylow appoligizing it was all a hoax!

  • manwar999 (touk...theres more to truth then what meets the eye...MYLOW knows what i am talking about...let me put it this way...im not a thief but i could be if i was threatened...understand???...t­hen would you all remember me for what i was, or for what i became...selah

  • your on the right tract with using ''gravity'' your a true honorable great investigator...your work is not going unoticed...im honored to be able to wach your video's...

  • To be clear: Mylow is a fraud. he has been exposed.

    watch?v=bw-8YJvicrw

    He uses fishing wire to drive the rotor at a distance with an electromotor. Nevertheless I learned from H. Johnson. It is still not proven that H. Johnson would have been a fraud. Thus replications are still worthwile, eventhough to my opinion it takes more than a simple Mylow type of construction to put magnets at work for a motor.

  • its an ordinary try like others but still not the perfect one

  • Where is your's?

  • everybody is in for a big surprise

  • This is soooo funny to us who have studied many of these videos....Its not like a water hose shooting water... LOL

  • Keep on trucking. I belive you will one day soon find a solution to this. From wha i ahve seen, yours is the closest to becoming a reality.

  • Een gevolg van de wet van behoud van energie is dat het niet mogelijk is om een experiment uit te voeren dat vanzelf energie genereert; het is dus niet mogelijk dat een apparaat vanzelf gaat draaien en blijft draaien zonder dat van buitenaf energie wordt toegevoerd. Hon-der-den mensen zijn jou al vooraf gegaan en het is nog nooit iemand gelukt om dit aan de gang te krijgen.

  • Engels graag! Het gaat om het omzetten van ruimte-energie in kinetische energie. Energie kan je niet maken dus. Er wordt geen natuurwet gebroken als zoiets werkt, we hebben dan alleen maar een methode ontdekt om de tijdenergie van het universum te vangen in een machine.

    Transl.: It is about the conversion of space energy. Energy cannot be created. No laws are broken when such a thing works, all we did then is having discovered a method to harness the time energy of the universe whith a machine.

  • Magneten die jij hier gebruikt hebben een statisch magnetisch veld en je hebt minimaal 1 dynamisch magnetisch veld nodig (bijvoorbeeld een electromagneet, aangestuurd door wisselstroom of jouw bewegende hand om de disk te laten draaien.

  • The disc is the dynamic field here. What are you saying now? Please talk English here, we are with a majority of English speakers.

    But I agree with you that more is needed for a thing like this to work. As I said, personally I am convinced that a least two basic forces are needed for a selfrunner, that catches the time energy of the universe.

  • You need a dynamic magnetic field to get the disc turning. For example your hand moving the stator magnetic and in that case you add energy, in fact you have an electromotor.

    But hey, go ahead a spend your money on this fairytale.

  • I agree, this is not my design. It is HJ/Mylow's. I would engage gravity to create the dynamic stator. But I haven't suceeded in doing so though yet. See my IPMM series, latest versions, where I am trying to negotiate gravity pulses with a magnetic rotor.

  • JE staat vioor lul zeg!

  • This guy Zaagmans1 saying in Dutch: you are making a fool of yourself with you trials. My answer. What do you care about shame, I'm not bothered by failing with something. Better to try and fail than not to have tried anything at all. It happens to be trial and error to achieve something. How else does one learn? That is how science progresses. To see or feel shame without trying oneself, that is Zaagmans1 real problem.

  • DUde, learn some physics!

  • Its about the equivalence principle (relativity priciple). We intend to break that. It is not a law.... I know conservation of energy principle etc.. Don't you worry about me...

  • FAKE FAKE!!! DOESN'T WORK!!

    Werkt niet!

  • May be you need to try the Redneck Replicator theory and just start putting magnets down where ever they work and remove them where they don't. It seems to work for him and it ran for a while until his stator assembly fell apart. But that was because he held it in place with his left hand and his camera in the other hand. He tried to hold the camera in his mouth so he could use both hands, but that did not work too good. But he said his magnet placing system always worked, most of the time.

  • That was difficult to do with the method I used (stacking six of them). But sure is that different spacing to the degree Mylow demonstrated didn't make much of a difference in my case..

  • I'd get rid of dual driving magnet set up (remove the ones on the left). Just have the (2 phased) magnets on the one/right side of you stator.

    Or... place a second stator bar with your 2nd set of driving magnets next to the main one separated by a 51.42º (360/7) degree angle.

  • Of course i tried both, single and double. Double gives a smoother run provided the number of groups is uneven.

  • Great, man, keep on going.

    Did ya know Chopin was very interested by the technological developments of his time ?

  • Nice try man, nothing to feel bad about. Mylow wanted it to work too, but it doesn't, at least not in this form. Howard Johnson was doing extremely advanced things, apparently, dealing with the spin of electrons within the magnets themselves, cutting magnets at specific angles etc. HJ seemed legit, it's too bad we don't have the full story of what happened to his research data. Bedini says he has it, I tend to believe him, but who knows.

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more