The Zapruder Film of 9/11 - Daniel Sunjata

[tubeyou9878]

jFK-was-shot-bysomeone-in-the-­trunk.That-explains-JFK-and-Co­nnolly-being--shot-at-the-same­-time.It-also-explains-the-ang­le-he-was-shot.You-can-see

the-bullet-at-abou10-degrees-o­ver-top-his-head.Shooter-had-t­o-be-in-line-with-the-two-inor­der-to-have-hit-both-of-them.S­hooter-was-in-trunk.

[BarryDennen12]

I will never cease to be amazed by the ability of human beings to make shit up.

[pearlofprice]

@fads90 you need to do more research that is clear!!! Google James Files and watch his interview!!!!!! There were many shots fired in Dealey plaza that day 12 different doctors at Parkland said there was a entrance wound to the left rear of his head and a 7 centimeter hole blasted out on the right rear. Say what u want this is FACT

[inspectorcritic]

where can I download the zapruder film?

[misscarolinec]

@inspectorcritic copy paste the url and go to 'keepvid.com' and download! Or you can find it to download frame by frame by just googling it as well :) Cheers!

[papawx3]

Officer Tippet saw something he was not supposed to see. He was shot for that reason by one of the Oswald look-a-likes {there were several}. Also, read about Dorothy Killgalen. She too was killed because of what she had discovered. As for 9-11, only a sucker still believes the offical story given to us by the same people who did it. Just like JFK.

[unholyimage]

Came from one of the Kennedy vids just now thinking he was thrown backwards. But now that I see it played continuously, it doesn't really look like that. It looks like the shot threw brains forward and then his body convulsed backwards reflexively.

[Daddyo930]

@unholyimage Do you know anything about physics. Your statement and conjecture here are sophomoric at best and a lame attempt to continue the "smoke and mirrors" arguments that let everyone who had anything to do with this time to die. You will have everything taken from you and you will get nothing for your ignorance. Don't worry, no one is coming to take the gun from your cold dead hands. You will not die. You will be forced to spend the rest of time with those whom you still defend. :D

[voffs]

@fads90

True, but the momentum from behind would send him forward and purely forward. He died when the bullet impacted I think. Anyways, if he died when the bullet impacted, there'd be no backwards jerking if it was from the Texas school book depository.

[JSSTyger]

Just think, 11 years after 9-11, we may have legit video proof of inside job. And just like the case with JFK, it'll have been to long a time period for anyone to care.

[WTCnucleardemolition]

pure fission bombs ...

Google "9/11 Nukes - Radiation-induced cancers"

[kebabrullemums]

Thats what they do, They have always done this with people they wanna get rid with, THey did it with Olof Palme, Anna lindh etc etc....

[mikethemooable]

I applaud the makers of this video and the contribution of Mr. Sunjata. This country is committing suicide and we all need to do what we can to stop it.

[retatkcid]

Take back the discussion of the implosion of WTC7 from those who have derailed it into a debate about the patsy Oswald.

[fads90]

Yeah no. If the bullet hit him from the front then how come his body jerks forward for a split second before it jerks back. It jerks back after it jerks forward because of something called MOMENTUM. I'd call you brain dead but that would be an insult to people in comas.

[shoutitloud01]

.org

[shoutitloud01]

MilitaryOfficersFor911Truth 

[colliric]

0:31 to 0:35 is a flat out lie in the voice over.. other users have already point this out I guess, but it still angers me to hear that statement.

[shoutitloud01]

@colliric It angers you to hear and see proof that JFK was killed by more than one lone patsy and that WTC7 was brought down with thermite? Sorry buddy but its the truth. And even if (biiiiiig IF) the JFK thing is not accurate, thats not the point. That footage is only used to make a point about 9/11. A point that demands to be addressed. Deal with that instead of harping the four seconds of video that you take issue with.

[colliric]

@shoutitloud01

No, it would not anger me, unless it is not true, which it is, and the only credible evidence to emerge concerning JFK's assination has done nothing but support the bullet's trajectory as was reported by the warren commission, in particular the findings of modern ballistic investigations into the incident.

The problem is that outright lie does not set a high standard of confidence in the rest of the video. In fact I stopped playing it to make my previous post.

[shoutitloud01]

@shoutitloud01 oookayyy then. magic bullets and magic collapses. good luck with that buddy.

[Moreofthesamez]

I believe that elements in the American and Israeli governments and spy agencies were behind 911, but I find it deplorable that most 911 truth sites and 911 truth campaigns ask for donations. People are automatically suspicious of groups who want your money. Stop asking people for their money and trust that the truth will spread even faster by word of mouth. Notice also that 911 debunkers never ask for donations and they point out that 911 truthers ask for donations. You're harming the message!!

[dgl1962]

This is so old and irrelevant, it's like debating and fretting over who killed Julius Caesar.

It doesn't matter at this point if the CIA killed him, Oswald (which is most lilkely) or martians, all of those involved are dead and makes it beyond proving one way or another.

ENOUGH!

[yourmumstube78]

@dgl1962

you F*** idiot, if you find out who did this and how they did it then you learn about the chain of command and how it operates which is relevent to today and offcource it shows that there is a precedent as with any proof of theory like physics it has to be measurable and have happened before and re-peatable.

wallow in your ignorance you apathetic pig

[dgl1962]

@yourmumstube78 So if the culprits that supposedly killed Kennedy can be identified, we can prevent another assassination?

If the culprits of 911 were identified and it is determined to be a false flag, do you believe that we can prevent a future attack?

If you get a handful of physicists to say that the twin towers couldn't have fallen without explosives,would that prove who did it & could it prevent another attack?

Who's the fucking idiot now?

Moron

[DemonDik]

@dgl1962 The killing of JFK is absolutely a watershed event concerning the US government's direction and change in foreign policy following that assassination. Even unto the present, the men who have held the highest offices of government for this nation have direct ties to JFK's death in Dallas and the warren commission,. Two members of the commission ended up becoming presidents. Specter has been a life long chair holder in the senate. Clinton just gave Boggs a ride to the airport.

[dgl1962]

@DemonDik Oswald killed him, why else would he be running away from the scene and kill that cop before trying to hide in a theatre?

Are you now going to tell me that there was no cop killed by Oswald and that "he was just a patsy for that crime too"?

[DemonDik]

@dgl1962 Oswald was in the book depository and caught at the theater. He was also used as a provocateur by the FBI and a double agent for the CIA. I think he was "placed" in the job at the TSBD and thought his role was somehow linked to the security of the president. When the hammer came down Oswald put two and two together and understood he was to be fingered for the assassination. He probably did kill Tippet. Would Tippet have mattered at that point? not likely

[dgl1962]

@DemonDik So you're saying that Oswald did kill Tippet, why would he do such a thing KNOWING that he would spend the rest of his life in jail or be executed for it?

That action by Oswald (killing Tippet) is only logical if Oswald just committed a bigger crime (like killing the president) and wanted to flee no matter who stopped him.Oswald was a commie sympathizer and movies showed him on the street handing out leaflets in defense of Castro (unless you try to say that "those were fake movies").

[DemonDik]

@dgl1962 Don't you know how the FBI and the CIA both spread an agenda? They create a fictional character using one of their own and put them in very public places promoting the very ideas that would be viewed as anti-American and in league with the current arch nemesis of the country. That's why Oswald is accepted so easily as the lone assassin, he was a "commie" . Better dead than red was one of the mottoes of the day then I believe. Tippet's murder pales to being JFK's killer.

[dgl1962]

@DemonDik Tippet's murder paling in comparison to JFK's murder was my exact point, Oswald would have no problems shooting some cop if he just aced the president, which supports my claim that Oswald shot Tippet (others have said he was "set up" for the Tippet shooting as well) after blasting JFK.

My point was, why would Oswald shoot some cop unless he was trying to make a getaway from something very serious?

[DemonDik]

@dgl1962 And I'm saying that if Oswald realized he was going to be fingered as the president's killer he probably would have had no problem shooting Tippet if Tippet was hindering Oswald's evasion. Why go to a theater? I think the theater was the place Oswald was supposed to go for "extraction" if his objective were to be destroyed.

[dgl1962]

@DemonDik Wait a minute, how on earth could Oswald have known that "he was going to be fingered" by the CIA or aliens for the killing of JFK that early in the game?

You've just reinforced my theory,he knew that he was going to be fingered BECAUSE HE KILLED KENNEDY!

[dgl1962]

@DemonDik Your theory matches my theory as to why Oswald was running and killed to cop in order to keep running,he shot the president and was willing to do anything to get away.

[DemonDik]

@dgl1962 Oswald wasn't dumb. If he had orders to be in a specific place that day under false directives (say he may have thought he was security or may have even had orders to shoot the president) . The sniper's nest in the TSBD was a miserable place to shoot at Kennedy. There were tree branches with leaves in the way, shooting before the car turned on Elm offered excellent visiblity to the shooter but Oswald decided to wait til there was brush in his sights to execute 2 of the best shots

[DemonDik]

@dgl1962 ever fired during an assassination. The rifle used was a surplus clunker which were known for their lack of craftsmanship. So Oswald scored two hits at his moving target, one being a fatal head shot, while taking the foliage into account and bolted those rounds perfectly each time. Making the required length of time to do so. This idea is ludicrous. There were at least two other shooters present. More likely 3, set up so Kennedy would be in a triangular kill zone.

[dgl1962]

@DemonDik So, you at least acknowledge that Oswald (among others) shot at JFK?

[DemonDik]

@dgl1962 I think Oswald very well could have been a shooter. There really is no evidence that can clear him completely from being a part of Kennedy's assassination. I've always believed that no single man on his own effort could kill a president. There must be people within the ranks, making windows of opportunity for a successful operation. The guard on the president is too aware and they eat and breath security protocol 24/7.

[sherifalex]

Please watch documentary movie "Loose Change" so you be dead sure building#7 has been bombed remotely. A lot of years later we will all be sure this action was not done by Al Qaeda, nor by Muslims, it has been done from Top Top levels of American Government.

Please watch the movie "Loose Change", I beg you.

[dubbys]

0:31 also the fragments of skull falls off with force forward. if he was hit from the front it would have gone back toward the back of his head.

[dubbys]

0:26 he had been shot through the back of the neck and was leaning forward most likely in pain and struggling to breath. 0:31 The next shots aim was corrected with just slightly too much lead on the center of the head. the bullet skims his temple removing part of his skull and slightly pushing him forward quickly and out of instinct or just general dynamics/physics of the human neck it tensions back and exactly 180 degrees from the point of impact. case closed. get over it.

[dubbys]

bull. he goes forward first. then probably in the last milisecond of life he had left he naturally thrusted his body away from the side he got hit. the bullet barely hit him on the right temple making him trust his head forward then rapidly back and to the left.

[howitzer24]

@dubbys He was leaning forward because of the first bullet hit from the back. He started turtling up to protect himself. His arms come in and his chin tucks. That's survival instinct. 

[dubbys]

@howitzer24 agreed from what i can see both rounds came from behind him. case closed. lets eat some cake.

[lushfauna]

The BBC footage of WTC early demise is also a powerful counter part to this.

I'll contribute- they where sloppy we know 911 was an inside job. They let it/helped it happen.

[Andreask93]

Learn how Newtonian physics and ballistics work! Building seven fell way slower then freefall speed, and collapsed because of the extensive damage on the side facing the towers. JFK's head was forced backwards do to blast from the exit-wound in face forcing, his head backwards. THE OFFICIAL EXPLANATIONS MAKE PERFECT SENSE, BUT ONLY TO THE PEOPLE SMART ENOUGH TO UNDERSTAND THEM!

[RaphNadal]

@Andreask93

so I guess 1,275 architects, engineers and demolition companies are all full of crap except YOU??

you must a be stupid fucking Americunt idiot.

[Andreask93]

@RaphNadal WTF are you talking about?!

[Andreask93]

@RaphNadal Come back with a reasonable scientific argument the next time that you wish to discuss something.

[gt40f]

@Andreask93, The "tower side" damage to 7 was not extensive at all, just a part of a corner on a couple floors and some facade. Falling speed is not that material, it comes down symmetrical, looking exactly like demolition. The fires were discontinuous and non-simultaneous. Besides even with fully engulfed fires steel buildings don't collapse. A bullet will cause a head/body to move in the direction the bullet is fired. That's always been a tough one for you CIA disinfo people to refute.

[Andreask93]

@gt40f The damage of the side facing the towers WAS very extensive, however, a video uploaded to Youtube a few years ago, showed the west side of the building ,and claimed that it saw the south side. It also took the building close to 17 seconds to collapse, however this is hard to see because it collapsed form the inside first. If you watch the video of the building collapsing, you can see a structure of the roof collapsing and taking the rest of the inside floors with it.

[MMIIXX]

@Andreask93 I challenge you to show us a building anywhere in the world collapse like any of the 3 that collapsed on 911 ...any cause ,anywhere ,any type.

[Andreask93]

@MMIIXX I'd love to, but sadly I cant afford to buy three sky scrapers, and two jetliners just to destroy them.

[MMIIXX]

@Andreask93 three buildings ,two jetliners,no understanding of physics .

[MMIIXX]

@MMIIXX Watch this the Secret Service would prefer it was never seen.

watch?v=sOT4JlgcX-g&feature=pl­ayer_embedded

[Andreask93]

@gt40f Regarding your comments about the ballistic properties of a rifle bullet, I can say that both my father and I hunt, and I know a thing or to about ballistics. I know for a fact what happens when you shoot a thick shell filled with liquid (like a head). I don't just listen to what people tell me and get in line for mental cocksucking.

[mariotaz]

What would be the point of showing the footage exactly?

[AuburnJunky]

Fist of all, the "shot"s came from the book depository.

Second of all, building 7's lower floors were weakened so badly by the falling of 1 and 2, that it couldn't support its own weight.

Go outside and take a sledgehammer, and knock all the supports columns off your house, and see how long it stands.

Moving on.

[geoffritchey1]

@AuburnJunky 'Moving on' because you have a hell of a lot of sites to visit huh? Just like Santa Claus. The truth is coming down like a tidal wave.

[AuburnJunky]

@geoffritchey1 Step away from the chalupa.

Someone get this guy a straitjacket and a tin foil cap.

[12stringsforme]

@AuburnJunky Precisely. Tower 7 south side damage was deep and structural, across many floors. But these inconvenient facts interfere with someone's belief system ie. government is out to kill us all, and therefore deny, deny, deny.

[howitzer24]

@12stringsforme Yes it was deep and structural. Clearly debris from a plane hitting a building 500 feet away caused deep structural damage...

[anunnaki2006]

Notice this video does not show the driver of the limosine? This is because the driver, William Greer shot J.F.K. Use your common sense and ask why was the first lady trying to climb out the car instead of trying to cover herself if the shots came from outside the car. She was petrified of Greer and company working for Cardinal Francis Spellmen and his Knights of Malta controlling the Deutsche Verteidgungs Dienst nazis of the Vatican's Dragonovic ratlines tied to the Knight of Malta, Grace's

[the82spartans]

Weak as the day is long.  I feel cheated and I threw up a little in my mouth, you sob's.

[nutt66]

ALL of you need to google, 'Top Ten Photos 9/11 Conspiracy Nuts Hate'

Mainly look at the overhead shot of the collapsing debris onto WTC 7 and the picture of the building 7 damage

you all give the Govt too much credit, not only to be able to pull off this conspiracy but also to be able to stop whistle blowers (who could make MILLIONS selling their story)

[TheParadigmShift]

@nutt66

There are many whistleblowers and those pictures only prove the theories right. Yes debris hit WTC7 but if that is what caused the collapse like the government paid NIST says then why did the building not collapse when it was struck?

[nutt66]

@TheParadigmShift the wtc 7 structure that remained had to weaken (similar to the towers), that is why fire fighters (with the help of instruments) were able gauge the inevitable result of building 7

a whistle blower that was on the inside if the Bush admin?

[TheParadigmShift]

@nutt66

The government paid NIST theory of "weakening" and "thermal expansion" does not look anything like what was observed on 9/11. The NIST computer simulation looks nothing like the actual collapse and does not explain the explosion sound that kicks off the collapse as seen here: /watch?v=XrnmbUDeHus

It also does not explain why the penthouse collapses 9 seconds before the rest of the building and does not explain why rescue worker Kevin McPadden described a countdown to blow up WTC7.

[nutt66]

@TheParadigmShift there was NO countdown, they announced it was going to fall. that's it

"does not look like what was observed on 9/11" multiple floors collapsing inward at the point of impact, destroying the structural integrity and bringing down the towers. that is exactly what we witnessed and it's all on video. as for your link, i get nothing, send a link to my youtube page

9 seconds before? i have watched video of it far too many times, the roof caves in a split second before collapse

[gt40f]

@nutt66 When the roof caves is immaterial. Spot damage and spot fires could not have come close to collapsing 7. It looks exactly like a controlled demolition. 7 was the control center for the twin tower demolition, and it housed records for massive federal criminal prosecutions, SEC etc. They had to get rid of the evidence.

[TheParadigmShift]

@nutt66

To view an extensive list of high level government officials who reject the government paid for conspiracy theory regarding 9/11 see patriotsquestion911(dot)com

[nutt66]

@TheParadigmShift non of those people were on the inside, how could they keep people who were involved quiet? there would have to be MANY hands in on this to get it done, military, political, private, and even locally. i aint buying it

[thewigwamtribe]

@nutt66 rewatch building 7 collapse. Fires? I aint buying it

[gt40f]

@nutt66 The CIA has long had a system, it's compartmentalized and enforced by threat of death. It wouldn't take that many people either, probably between 50 and 100.

[gt40f]

@nutt66 Structure that remained? 7 was barely damaged from the twin towers fall and fires don't bring down steel skyscrapers, even fully engulfed ones which 7 only had spot fires on a few floors that did not burn at the same time. So NIST couldn't even explain the fall of 7 and you are saying firefighters calculated it with "instruments"? LOLZ!!!! What kind of "instruments" exactly, please explain?

[RaphNadal]

@gt40f

nutt66 has a very apropo name

[A55ma57er]

@nutt66 How come they found nano-termite in the rubble of WTC, then?

[nutt66]

@A55ma57er nano-thermite is a generic term, specifically which type? Aluminium-molybdenum oxide Aluminium-copper oxide Aluminium-iron oxide Antimony-potassium permanganate Aluminium-potassium permanganate Aluminium-bismuth oxide Aluminium-tungsten oxide hydrate Aluminium-fluoropolymer or Titanium-boron? BTW they had to cut the steel in order to get it out, that is why they are cut and left puddles of melted steel in the basement. Guess what they would use to do that?

[A55ma57er]

@nutt66 Search for "danish scientist nano thermite" in here and stfu!

[gt40f]

@nutt66 Cutting torches don't leave puddles of melted steel. Also there were fires that burned for months and that could not be extinguished even when submerged with water. Thermite burns just like that.

[martijnlafeber]

Suppose the entire world will know the depressing truth about 9/11. Then what?

[selflessgreed]

If Islam is the enemy of these people, yet these people are wrong.. I ask you where do you belong?

[ominekoJ]

Slow load for me.. good thing there are mirrors

[WTC7WasPulled]

Not enough people know 9/11 was a controlled demolition. We need to get the word out!

[tshirtfaction]

The " Neocon Geographic Channel" has produced two new documentaries to back up the governments 9/11 lie. One is called Giuliani's 9/11. I'm planning on making a new video using some bizarre fake evidence that they put out for the first time.

[EAImedia]

BAD ANALOGY.. Yes, WTC7 is important. But! When shot with a high velocity bullet which exits the cranium, the head will be propelled AWAY from the EXIT point because of the temporary jet of exiting mass and pressure generated by the temporary cavity. Not only that but it's clearly an exit wound >_>

[xjlmt]

@EAImedia You obviously don't know what you're talking about.

[Moreofthesamez]

@EAImedia If Oswald had shot Kennedy from above the exit wound would have been somewhere in the face or neck, not in the skull

[EAImedia]

@Moreofthesamez Never did I say he was shot from above or that Oswald did it. I'm only commenting that it doesn't prove he was shot from the front - unlike the narrator describes.

[prayfortruejustice]

For Christ sake people lets donate on the web site and get the message aired in NYC. You can use paypal - donate 5$ -- I keep trowing $20s their way -- IF YOU CAN DONATE.

buildingwhat org

Don't give up - NEVER GIVE UP

[chkdg8]

I'm just waiting for the Dislikes to come in only to tell them that their now in the minority.

[dtoma555]

@chkdg8 Who do you think is in the minority? What percentage of Americans do you think believe Kennedy's head slumped forward in the Zapruder film like the official story claims?

[chkdg8]

@dtoma555 I'm talking about 9/11. Let's not even talk about the missing frames in the Zapruder film.

[StevenM818]

Larry Silverstein is the key to 9/11, as Clay Shaw was of Jim Garrison's original JFK investigation.

[Moreofthesamez]

@StevenM818 There are many "keys" - the secret service didn't "remove" Bush from the school he was in till 9:35AM, thirty minutes after it was clear there was an attack going on. Someone in the secret service was in the know that Bush was in no danger. Fema arrived in New York on Monday September the 10th as part of the war games and were "conveniently" in place to go into action next day. Whoever arranged those war games for Sept. 11th was on the inside of this "inside job". It goes on and on

[Moreofthesamez]

@Moreofthesamez What the hell You Tube? When I type a time in that has nothing to do with the video here why does it automatically become a link????

[Steeper33]

Excellent video!!

[btoy11]

Nicely edited. The message is clear; these two horrific events are connected. Lets ensure the 9-11 Truth movement doesn't need to go on for 40+ years.

[MyExpandedMind]

Building what?!  No plane, barely any fire, freefall... yeah

[FromCanadaEh]

Go back to sleep ... noting to see here ... the Federal Reserve, Wall Street, and the Military Industrial complex are your very best friends ... your eye-lids are heavvvvvy, go back to sleep... or go watch Snooki from Jersey Shore.

[unsheepled]

@FromCanadaEh

Between this and the confisgated footage from the pentagon ( with only 5 frames released for public viewing) there really is nothing here for sheeple.

They will continue to close their eyes to this as long as they keep gawking at the television. Whats a 2 minute commercial, against 24/7 'programming' read brainwashing, that has gone on for nearly a decade.

BUT, surprise me !

[Avidsh21]

Well done!

[wejewsdid911HAHAHA89]

HAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHA do you think you will suceed hehehehhehehe we own the mass media you stupid goy trash

[RC365247]

@wejewsdid911HAHAHA89

You are amazing! I did not know that lemons could type!

[RC365247]

If you find out who ordered Kennedy’s murder, you will probably end up resolving many of the questions surrounding 9/11 and visa versa. Excellent work reopen911 and Daniel Sunjata!

[44connected]

@RC365247

Your probably right.

Check out the pictures of George Bush snr stood outside the book store on the day JFK was shot.

[bofors7715]

Brilliant.

[WTFaboutWTC7]

Powerful!

[riesenpimmel69]

good luck!