Gregory Cochran and Henry Harpending's 2009 book, "The 10,000 Year Explosion: How Civilization Accelerated Human Evolution" is an excellent rebuttal to this kind of research. Among other traits, they cite lactose tolerance in adults as an example of continuing human evolution. Besides, static evolution means extinction and some unforeseen cataclysmic event could nullify any technological or cultural response to such a catastrophe.
Evolution has not stopped or slowed at all. He talks about mutation, natural selection and drift, because we are not exposed to stresses such as a tiger chasing us doesn't mean evolution is dead. Prof Jones is missing one aspect which is transgenic mutation. I believe future generations have the abillity to pick up skills purely based upon the experiences of their parents; the observation that
children are now readily using computers for example.
Interesting lecture. But he seems to assume that Western society represents the "endpoint of human evolution" to which other cultures (Muslim world, Africa etc.) will "naturally develop". But natural selection and genetic drift are still powerful factors in these areas, and if you look at worldwide birth rates, I would rather doubt that in 100 years the whole world will live in "our utopia"...
Human evolution is still occuring but not through natural selection. Humans' are unique in the animal kingdom in having differential fertility instead of differential mortality as the main force affecting selection. There are clearly large fertility differences between individuals of different social classes or countries.
More than likely our advancements in technology will allow us to play with our own genetics bypassing the natural evolutionary step, perhaps we may believe we get to a level where evolution is no longer needed i.e becoming immortal or stopping ageing, perhaps this may happen when we become a space faring civilisation.
@GEOPAIH1234 It's interesting that the changes that humans produced in dogs, horses, etc through selective breeding could be produced in just 1 generation through genetic engineering. Some Science fiction novels have loved ideas about human evolution having gone wrong in some way, such as H.G Well's' The Time Machine & A. Huxley's Brave New World.
Even though the natural selection part might be less active, The sexual and cultural selection and the preasure in a group "will" make big changes in a species. -.- and in developing countries where competition is still highly active natural selection is even more active. -.- To say that Human evolution is over is just weird.. The humans in developing countries are humans to lol ;);););) .. you could make an argument that human evolution in I countries are in theory "over" -.-.. But not in other
@MrBlamemeforit Evolution will cause the human race to split into many parts, indeed. Many say the working class will turn into strong brutes, and the intelligentsia will gain more brain mass. Social standards generally say that intelligent people do not marry stupid people, so it will eventually split off.
How can he say evolution is over in human societys.. Even tough predator preasure is less and death is less now i developed countries, evolution still takes place, Cultural and sexual selection is highly active. Evolution in icountries is not over -.-
Cultural and Sexual selection is active. But without natural selection...there is no evolution. In other words....if nature does not choose who lives and who dies...there is no evolution.
Well there is still "artificial" selection.. and quite powerfull to.. some scientists even suggested that we evolved the uber brains because of each other.. competition between fellow man. and evolution does not stop.. It just doesnt.. The idea that Evolution can stop is bissare.. Its an illusion because it works sooo slooooow.. so people in rich developed countries where competition is scarce..it might seem evolution has no part. Sorry for grammar :)
@MrBlamemeforit Well, artificial selection doesn't help evolution. If someone selected a sexual partner on the basis of ...say....their intelligence....the fellow with the lower intelligence will just go and mate with someone else. No one is dying off because of genetics.
This lecture discusses some of the most fascinating material one can come across - it's a shame there aren't more comments!! Perhaps the type that would enjoy this are less likely to be the "commenting" type. I'll be showing this video to my wife - I love you babe! I imagine this will still be on top when I show you. :)
Fascinating! I wonder how future artificial genetic modification ties into this? I mean, wouldnt it be safe to say that we, in perhaps a couple of hundred years, would be capable of modifying our own genes\dna ? Much like people change their appearance with plastic surgery today? Not really comparable, I know. Anyway, this stuff is awsome! Looking at the future from the future is a concept I very much buy into.
We are capable of doing it now. It is no different in principle than what we can already do on animals and plants. It hasn't happened because society wouldn't allow it.....yet
He looks a lot different since leaving The Sex Pistols. I wonder if he keeps in touch with Johnny Rotten.
Jefgg 2 days ago
nice video.. very interesting...
thegreeensky 3 months ago
thanks for this!
katheryncruz24 3 months ago
Gregory Cochran and Henry Harpending's 2009 book, "The 10,000 Year Explosion: How Civilization Accelerated Human Evolution" is an excellent rebuttal to this kind of research. Among other traits, they cite lactose tolerance in adults as an example of continuing human evolution. Besides, static evolution means extinction and some unforeseen cataclysmic event could nullify any technological or cultural response to such a catastrophe.
ralexnicholas 8 months ago
Skip straight to 3:10.
tjmac7 9 months ago 27
@tjmac7 thanks
claton95 5 months ago in playlist Liked
I hope I get an offer from Edinburgh :(
lorinthemaggot 11 months ago
Evolution has not stopped or slowed at all. He talks about mutation, natural selection and drift, because we are not exposed to stresses such as a tiger chasing us doesn't mean evolution is dead. Prof Jones is missing one aspect which is transgenic mutation. I believe future generations have the abillity to pick up skills purely based upon the experiences of their parents; the observation that
children are now readily using computers for example.
m1trekker 1 year ago
Interesting lecture. But he seems to assume that Western society represents the "endpoint of human evolution" to which other cultures (Muslim world, Africa etc.) will "naturally develop". But natural selection and genetic drift are still powerful factors in these areas, and if you look at worldwide birth rates, I would rather doubt that in 100 years the whole world will live in "our utopia"...
BernhardSchaefke 1 year ago
woohoo, that;s the hall I graduated in. Class of 2002
cveitch 1 year ago
Human evolution is still occuring but not through natural selection. Humans' are unique in the animal kingdom in having differential fertility instead of differential mortality as the main force affecting selection. There are clearly large fertility differences between individuals of different social classes or countries.
STEPHENWRAYSFORD33 1 year ago 3
what's up with those british women biting their nails ? :P
farouqnimer 1 year ago
More than likely our advancements in technology will allow us to play with our own genetics bypassing the natural evolutionary step, perhaps we may believe we get to a level where evolution is no longer needed i.e becoming immortal or stopping ageing, perhaps this may happen when we become a space faring civilisation.
GEOPAIH1234 1 year ago
@GEOPAIH1234 It's interesting that the changes that humans produced in dogs, horses, etc through selective breeding could be produced in just 1 generation through genetic engineering. Some Science fiction novels have loved ideas about human evolution having gone wrong in some way, such as H.G Well's' The Time Machine & A. Huxley's Brave New World.
STEPHENWRAYSFORD33 1 year ago
Comment removed
STEPHENWRAYSFORD33 1 year ago
Even though the natural selection part might be less active, The sexual and cultural selection and the preasure in a group "will" make big changes in a species. -.- and in developing countries where competition is still highly active natural selection is even more active. -.- To say that Human evolution is over is just weird.. The humans in developing countries are humans to lol ;);););) .. you could make an argument that human evolution in I countries are in theory "over" -.-.. But not in other
MrBlamemeforit 1 year ago
@MrBlamemeforit Evolution will cause the human race to split into many parts, indeed. Many say the working class will turn into strong brutes, and the intelligentsia will gain more brain mass. Social standards generally say that intelligent people do not marry stupid people, so it will eventually split off.
JuniorDExchangecore 1 year ago
How can he say evolution is over in human societys.. Even tough predator preasure is less and death is less now i developed countries, evolution still takes place, Cultural and sexual selection is highly active. Evolution in icountries is not over -.-
MrBlamemeforit 1 year ago
Cultural and Sexual selection is active. But without natural selection...there is no evolution. In other words....if nature does not choose who lives and who dies...there is no evolution.
hivelocity100 1 year ago
Well there is still "artificial" selection.. and quite powerfull to.. some scientists even suggested that we evolved the uber brains because of each other.. competition between fellow man. and evolution does not stop.. It just doesnt.. The idea that Evolution can stop is bissare.. Its an illusion because it works sooo slooooow.. so people in rich developed countries where competition is scarce..it might seem evolution has no part. Sorry for grammar :)
MrBlamemeforit 1 year ago
@MrBlamemeforit Well, artificial selection doesn't help evolution. If someone selected a sexual partner on the basis of ...say....their intelligence....the fellow with the lower intelligence will just go and mate with someone else. No one is dying off because of genetics.
hivelocity100 1 year ago
I have him for 1st year genetics at UCL
brilliant guy. most capturing speechs
diuton 2 years ago 5
@diuton Lucky as hell dude.
RonBurgundy161 1 year ago
@diuton Is genetics a a sub subject of biology? or is it its own major
claton95 5 months ago in playlist Liked
This lecture discusses some of the most fascinating material one can come across - it's a shame there aren't more comments!! Perhaps the type that would enjoy this are less likely to be the "commenting" type. I'll be showing this video to my wife - I love you babe! I imagine this will still be on top when I show you. :)
MrBigTanak 2 years ago
hahaha, I agree, subsequently I feel a bit more happy about studying genetics at university :D.
alex1314159 2 years ago
Fascinating! I wonder how future artificial genetic modification ties into this? I mean, wouldnt it be safe to say that we, in perhaps a couple of hundred years, would be capable of modifying our own genes\dna ? Much like people change their appearance with plastic surgery today? Not really comparable, I know. Anyway, this stuff is awsome! Looking at the future from the future is a concept I very much buy into.
PublicJoe88 2 years ago
More like 20 years, m8 :-) Stem cell research is accellerating at a very fast pace.
balkan2k 2 years ago 3
We are capable of doing it now. It is no different in principle than what we can already do on animals and plants. It hasn't happened because society wouldn't allow it.....yet
skintsquatscum 2 years ago
Well, that has actually
just changed. Im doing it ;)
PublicJoe88 2 years ago
I would be careful not to believe in initially wriong paradygms and realising you are far to close to the sun when you whings start melting.
bewaver 1 year ago