Added: 2 years ago
From: cctv7military
Views: 14,603
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (20)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • I don't like how they keep refering to the americans as oh i dont know, some one else. I mean, being an american it just seems strange. To be reffered to in the third person.

  • Wouldnt drilling a small hole into the first tird of the barrel have increased the accuracy of a smooth bore musket by controlling the spin of the bullet to go always in the same direction? (Similar maybe to the Hop-Up-System in a modern airsoft gun.)

  • The 250k per kill in vietnam figure was due to suppressive fire. charlie in the bushes? spray the bushes. Vietnam isn't like the the beaches of normandy, or afghanistan for that matter. The viet kong fought in dense jungle, and you cant see whos shooting at you, so you shoot and hope, aiming isnt possible. They just let loose with the brownings and covered an entire area.

  • the comentator sounds canadian...just listen how he says "book" or "football" :D:D

  • 3000-10 000 per casaulty ??in Vietnam it took 250 000 bullets per killed gook...

  • @anteracmacash Be respectful, they pwned u

  • @phungvietanhao who pwned me??

  • @anteracmacash You can't compare these numbers. It's one thing to spend 250,000 bullets to kill one guerrilla soldier is not the same as a volley missing a rank and file opposing force

  • @nerdbomb07 yes that would be the same thing since the weapons that they were firing were not straight shooters while the weapons used in vietnam are still today being glorified for their accuracy

  • @nerdbomb07

    thats a really ineffective way of judging the ultimate effect of small arms.

    The big firearms duel in Vietnam was between 5.56 and 7.62x39....and the first caliber always outranged the latter. US lost 58.000 in a 10yr span...killing 1.6 million combatants.

  • @anteracmacash

    there is no way of confirming that statistic...its a myth. No one can track shipments of ammunition and then marry up confirmed kills. Out of 1.6 million dead gooks...they think there was another half million unconfirmed.

    thats statistical inaccuracy is stupendous

  • This is incredible, how that's ALL videos don´t tell any way of the Spaniard contribution in the old firearms. You're a fucking chauvinist and prepotence.

  • @ELmalodelapenicula you need to chill, buddy.

  • @castegere Yes man, I admit my angry. But even so, not it's my country who which to solve differences between neighbors or nations to be shooting out. I can do it talk, like now. Thanks.

  • 50 yards????

  • The gun barrel shown at 2.59, Clip 4, has longitudinal grooves, which did mprove accuracy, not spiral grooves which came later. I don't see how longitudinal grooves

    could possibly have put a spin on a musket ball which spiral grooves cerrtainly did and still do.

  • The Italian name Tataglia should be pronounced without the G. Incidentally, this is also the name of one of the capi mafiosi in "The Godfather".

  • Standardization is always the best way to increase the lethality of the weapons of the time. Proven by the Romans, with javelins, shileds and the Gladius.

  • I beg to differ, Standardization is the best way to increase the lethality of AN ARMY, yet reducing the lethality of an individual weapon.

    Javelins and Gladius are the result of learning from barbarians. Standardization is the result of roman's military reform as army was maintained by the states since then.

  • @COLUMBINE1818 It is very effective because an army would produce only one caliber which is simpler, but it depends on the weapon mostly because if your general weapon is inferior to the enemy mixture of weapons, you will lose most definitely

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more