@Lawfish66 I feel your pain. If Doctor Paul does not get elected we will all take a genuine hit in the ass. Just so you know, the senate voted away your fourth amendment right today. I wonder if you'll miss it? Its past time to for everyone to be political, annoying or not. Your freedom is fading away.
@TheNewFourthEstate Dude, everyone always promises all this political bull and yet none of it ever comes into reality. If we elect anyone then we're all fucked, regardless of whether or not our freedom is slipping away. No man in America who runs for President ever has had good intentions for the common man; just all about them. Thats why I don't vote. Everyone's a dick today. All you can do is just roll with the flow.
The State, the government, the supreme, the eternal, the aggressor against the persons and property of the mass of the public, all states, everywhere, whether democratic, dictatorial, or monarchical, whether red, white, blue or brown.
For centuries the State has robbed people at bayonet point and called it “taxation.”, For centuries the State has enslaved people into its armed battalions and called it “conscription”
@bandrsox The state, run and bought by the private institutions you wish to empower further by eliminating a legal framework and governing body that provides a system of accountability and stability. You're a moron, and your gene pool should be cleansed.
@ethnicallyamerican So you think MORE government is necessary when you readily admit to it being run by the very private institutions you despise? Big businesses WRITE their own regulations, all MORE regulation does is handicap small businesses. You're fighting against your own cause.
@VolkOseba Please re-read my critique of libertarian society. What I suggested was a ban on private contributions to political campaigns and politicians in general, as well as the implementation of an electoral system where public funds are allocated to candidates to fight for both election and re-election, once they qualify for the ballot (which, in this case, would require a certain amount of signatures from registered voters). A legal framework is required to achieve this.
@VolkOseba The absence of laws to punish such behavior or prevent corporatist policies from being forged ultimately births such a system. A libertarian-capitalist system emphasizes freedom of individuals and economic actors, and a minimal role of the state to regulate these entities. Since liberty is guaranteed to such an extreme degree, they are able to construct these corrupt, self-serving systems by building it through policy, since there is no precedent saying they cannot. Comprehend?
Look at the top two comments. Back to mine. Back to the top two. Now back to mine. Sadly, they aren't mine. But if you stopped handing out thumbs up so freely, they could LOOK like mine. Look down, back up, where are you? Watching in awe as this comment gains thumbs up. look down, now back up. I have it, the ability to gain thumbs up by posting something so simple-minded. Look again, people copying and pasting my comment to other videos.
The "State" is conducting endless war against us aka "the war on drugs", we have more troops on the border of pakistan and Afganistan than we do on our own TX/Mexico where people are getting kidnapped and executed by drug cartels.
"In fact, if you wish to know how libertarians regard the State and any of its acts, simply think of the State as a criminal band, and all of the libertarian attitudes will logically fall into place." - To finish the paragraph.
I personally believe this is terrible, and I will go into great details using music theory, chord, and rhythm analysis as to why you are an idiot for liking this music. But I would never force my views of music onto other people like a communist would, I'll just pester the fuck out of them until they realize that their taste in music is a numbing mental disorder.
@ThePurelogic I believe the Subjective theory of value so even though I don't like the music I recognize that other people may and the analytically tools that I have that show how the music is terrible only work in reference to my own values.
@LatteJonny this is the greatest answer I've ever heard on youtube in regards to musical taste and the subjective value theory. Thank god there are people out there that understand this concept.
LOL...young people are getting exposed to truth...In spite of the indoctrination of 13 years of forced enslavement. Shiver in fear, Ruling Class...WE are coming for you...With ideas on Liberty; which cannot be overcome.
The Great Lie of our age: taxation is necessary. Taxation is extortion. Voluntary, privatized security and arbitration services are the alternative. Anarcho-capitalism is the future.
@SpykerSpeed What is your opinion on the regulation of corporations and other private institutions? For example, what would you want to happen if a factory was considering dumping its mercury waste into a river instead of installing expensive filtration systems?
How would you stop a collusion of companies from forming an oppressive monopoly over services?
@Alectr0n What happens when a river runs between two nations and a factory upstream was polluting the river's water as it runs into the other country? Do the two nations go to war? No, of course not. The "cost" associated with this is too high. Similarly, in anarchy, property rights are naturally enforced as cultural norm. Mature adults resolve disputes peacefully, because not doing this is reputation-suicide. Here's a video you might like: watch?v=nOBD6v8g1F4
@SpykerSpeed My name is Andrew Ryan -- and I'm here to ask you a question. Is a man not entitled to the sweat of his brow? No says the man in Washington -- it belongs to poor. No, says the man in Vatican -- it belongs to God. No says the man in Moscow -- it belongs to the state.
@thefuzzmaster69 Search on YouTube for videos by Nielsio and Grahampwright. They explain how a voluntary society can function without a government. Books on the subject include "The Machinery of Freedom" by David Friedman and "For a New Liberty" by Murray Rothbard. These guys are economists who explain how all government functions can be privatized.
@NeverSTFUproductions The intense competition present in a truly free market would ensure the greatest possible quality at the lowest possible cost. This concept is especially true for security and dispute resolutions services, as no justice-seeking consumer is going to purchase the services of a firm with a reputation for bias, injustice, or poor quality of service. Such a firm would quickly lose its economic viability and fail. The market is a beautifully self-regulating spontaneous order.
@KnottheGun But who would hire the firm? Both disagreeing parties agree on one firm? Is there not a serious danger of someone hiring hitmen to invoke revenge on someone they had a dispute with instead of seeking fair justice? It could easily be organized without public knowledge, no face would be lost.
@NeverSTFUproductions While I cannot obviously know what exact form a free society would take, I can surmise answers to a few of your questions. It seems likely to me that in the absence of a state coercive monopoly on justice services, most people would purchase a form of insurance to ensure the safety of their persons and property. These insurance firms would provide: personal security, if the client felt the need to be well-protected; arbitration/dispute resolution, if the client came into...
@NeverSTFUproductions conflict with another individual/firm; and reimbursement for any property damage or medical expenses incurred. Individuals could customize their specific "justice package" based on their perceived needs. With that being said, such firms would likely contract with other firms and independent third parties to ensure fair arbitration of disputes and justice for all parties involved. There is, of course, the danger of some people choosing to secretly hire hitmen, but that...
@SpykerSpeed When you privatize everything, it creates a greater rift of welfare between people. Should we have no laws to govern these private institutions? You think that's a sensible decision? History has shown this does not work beyond a communal level, and you think this would work in a nation of 300+ million people of vastly varying demographics? It's funny how libertardians want fundamental laws to protect liberties but don't want to cough up the money to pay for the defense of such laws.
Awesome song, awesome message. This libertarian approves. There are moral absolutes, people: theft is wrong whether done by a individual or done by a group of individuals with nice, shiny badges. The State has brought more hate, enslavement and death across the world more than any institution. Free exchange, voluntary action, and self ownership are the bane of the State. Read up on Mises, Bastiat and Rothbard for a perspective not fed to you by government schools.
While I often hear the Rothbard argument about the state being a band of criminals and taxation is theft (and I agree) these arguments fall on deaf ears to statists on the left and right because they believe that we are free to vote in or out our elected officials and thus have a say in our system of taxation. This is only true if we had truly competitive elections and candidates chosen not by the media. Unfortunately, we do not, thus taxation is still theft but for this reason also.
@esperan2k The problem is that in a true capitalist society, where economic actors are free to act as they please without constraints imposed by the state, they can virtually buy elections, as they are doing now (except they are less free to do so, but hey, in a libertarian society, more corruption for everyone when those regulations are removed!).
@ethnicallyamerican The problem is private funding of elections that basically determines policy creation and election results. The only way to totally prevent this is to have public funding of elections through taxation, where candidates receive equal funding for campaigns, a ban on political tv advertisements, and a ban on private campaign contributions. If you want a true libertarian society, then you support selling government to the highest bidder, at a higher degree than we are seeing now.
@ethnicallyamerican This is false. The reason the elections are bought is corporatism, where the government doesn't allow true free market capitalism. If we had an actual free market, buying a politician wouldn't help you against competitors, as they cannot affect the economy for you.
@carlb86 False. In a true capitalist society, private businesses can pay to craft legislation which favors them, which is why capitalist societies ultimately turn into corporatist societies. Not only this, but even if this were so, a company that makes tens of billions can eventually assimilate and purchase other companies, which is the essence of monopoly creation. Lets see how fast it takes for the US to become a Wal-Mart and Koch oligarchical wasteland.
@carlb86 This is not true at all, actually. There are several factors that can foster the growth of a monopoly that have absolutely nothing do with government interference. The government, can, however, make it much easier for a monopoly to be created. Strategies such as dumping, price fixing, exclusive dealing and limit pricing are all viable options that can be used to either crush competitors or discourage entry into a market, and none require government involvement to be utilized.
@ethnicallyamerican It's not merely capitalism, but a marriage of capitalism and socialism which has given us the blessings of economic growth and more wealth for all. However, when the system is abused, and when regulations are removed or too many are instituted, then that is when it is broken and needs to be repaired.
@carlb86 Many people have historical amnesia and forget that government was expanded to regulate private economic actors because the people widely demanded them. This is why labor movements existed. Destroy the government, and we'll all be wage slaves getting paid as much as Chinese sweat shop workers (say hello to early 20th century America, once again!).The costs of living were too high, and the pay was too low.
@ethnicallyamerican In fact, with the institution of regulations and more extensive services, more people ascended to higher economic status than they did with the lack thereof. History books help, I would recommend one.
@ethnicallyamerican In a capitalist society, it is easy for politicians to shift to a corporatist system, since there are no laws in the first place to prevent one from developing. The essence of a capitalist philosophy is freedom, and when there are no regulations to block that sort of legislation from being drafted, it makes it both legal and simple to institute, since there are no repercussions for doing so and it benefits the legislators, whom get complimentary pay from interest groups.
"For centuries the State has robbed people at bayonet point and called it 'taxation.' In fact, if you wish to know how libertarians regard the State and any of its acts, simply think of the State as a criminal band, and all of the libertarian attitudes will logically fall into place."
thus spoke a career state parasite. true nonetheless.
I'm no fan of this genre of music. I can't stand it, actually. The MESSAGE, however, is what brought me here. I never expected to hear Murray Rothbard's wisdom put to music, but here it is.
If this appeals to you, you might want to check out mises.org.
Someone needs to take some HUGE speakers with ground breaking bass to Occupy Wallstreet, and blast this while getting in fights with the cops who are using police brutality.
The remix is sex, yes, but this is also very good. I think more people should appreciate fluid songs instead of filthy drops. AH WTF am I saying I sound like a hipster I'll just shut up.
@FreestylaBoy OMG!! STFU!!! THE STATE YA DUMBASS....why occupy wall street?!?! they are mostly men and women that define the prosperity of america. the only reason why they are involved in national issue because it is the state and military that allowed it. government today is bigger than ever before. those people occupying wall street look like a bunch of IDIOTS and are being laughed at!!
@CheddarCheezus Why wouldn't you want to share the wealth, didn't your mother ever tell you sharing is good? the difference between what they want and what communism is, is that in a communist society there is a leader that decides how people are to be treated which is usually bad, What the protesters want is for the people to run the country and equality for all.
@thefuzzmaster69 I don't think you fully understand socialism. Sharing the wealth means that people who work hard have to give their money to people who don't. That's not equal at all. And the government is going to do this for you. That's not run by the people either.
@CheddarCheezus Well it's my own opinion but i think that anybody who works is contributing to society and deserves equal treatment, Just because you're working at Mcdonalds flipping burgers, it doesn't mean that you should be barely getting by while someone who sits at a desk as a CEO of a large company has more money then he needs and let's it sit in his bank account when other people need it. Also the government is run by the people in a democratic society, people have the choice by voting.
@thefuzzmaster69 Oh really? Someone who doesn't do anything except flip burgers at McDonalds should get the money of a CEO who worked hard to get to that position? I don't think so. I'm sure you would feel the same way if you were that CEO.
@CheddarCheezus If I was a CEO and I had Millions or billions of dollar I would use maybe 200,00 a year to live, I don't need all that money, There's more important things to life then money. Really how hard earned is there money anyways? I'm talking the rich 1 % here, most of their companies were passed on through Their family. Also if you were so informed I'm sure that you would know how corrupt this capatilist society is
@thefuzzmaster69 Capitalism is the greatest system of economy that a country could utilize. It gives everyone the chance to go out and if they work hard, succeed and make a lot of money. But the people who are either too lazy and don't want to work end up poor and living on the street. And that's how it should be. The lazy shouldn't be given anything, they should suffer for the choices they made.
@CheddarCheezus You realize that most of the people who are on the street are their because they have an addiction or mental or physical disabilities, you sick fuck you should go hang yourself
Battlefield 3 <3
iDuck97 3 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
This song dropped harder than the Economy....
RON PAUL 2012
moartoad 3 weeks ago
Murray Rothbard dubsteb fucking brilliant
jcase15 1 month ago in playlist Favorite videos
FUCK THE SYSTEM
SLCforLIFE 1 month ago
Who's Ron Paul? ....
CelticAndProud 1 month ago
@CelticAndProud a proponent of free market economics which is advocated by anarchists. but he's a politician, don't vote for him.
AnarchoCapitalistTV 1 month ago
@CelticAndProud the futur president of the USA
the champion of the constitution
madtrade 1 month ago
@CelticAndProud Your next President -> /watch?v=_QZOHjqcE6E&feature=relmfu
Gegensteuer 3 weeks ago
sick.
methemetalqueenxD 1 month ago
RON PAUL R[ƎVO˩]UTION 2012!!
JackyB92 1 month ago
Comment removed
JackyB92 1 month ago
How can anyone not hate the state after listening to this song?!?! I know I do!
AndrewMason111 1 month ago
I'm... listening to dubstep? And enjoying it? WHAT IS WRONG WITH MEEEEE-
CombineRustler 1 month ago
@CombineRustler Porter Robinson is sick thats why.
muffykitty 1 month ago 2
ANARCHO-CAPITALISM <33333
moartoad 2 months ago 8
@moartoad ancaps are scum.
burntheretic 1 month ago
4:49
sorry. your princess is in another state
mario: ಠ_ಠ
Sjamrapper 2 months ago 6
@Sjamrapper lulz
AnarchoCapitalistTV 1 month ago
FUCK THE STATE
Tharapita 2 months ago 3
This has been flagged as spam show
Quotes from: FOR A NEW LIBERTY by MURRAY ROTHBARD, the Libertarian manifesto.
RON PAUL 2012, OR MOLOTOVS IN 2013.
AIMFILMGROUP 2 months ago
I wonder what Rothbard would have thought of this.
Tharapita 2 months ago
is it just me,or is the bakground smok slowly moving?
mongolianape 2 months ago
@mongolianape its just u
Daryusk 2 months ago
Centuries. The US hasn't been around THAT long.
Lawfish66 2 months ago
@Lawfish66
Last time I checked, 1776 was 234 years ago. That would be two centuries.
Moreover, the US has not been the only "State." Monarchic feudalism relies also upon the state. Organized religion, also, is a form of statism.
Quotes from: FOR A NEW LIBERTY by MURRAY ROTHBARD, the Libertarian manifesto.
RON PAUL 2012, OR MOLOTOVS IN 2013.
AIMFILMGROUP 2 months ago 2
@AIMFILMGROUP Hmm. Well, thanks for informing me good sir.
Lawfish66 2 months ago
Murray Rothbard ftw.
NefariousBanana 2 months ago 4
It would be pretty awesome to have a music video with the army, the irs, SWAT officers crushing protests, etc.
Mahacanda 2 months ago in playlist Favorite videos
For centuries the State has enslaved people into its armies Italians and called it "conscription".
Cinnamonbuns13 2 months ago
Optimus Prime is an anarchist.
mdsnrey06 2 months ago
Ron Paul wants to end the Wars and bring some Peace back to America once again.
Vote for Peace. Ron Paul 2012 !
TheNewFourthEstate 2 months ago 2
@TheNewFourthEstate I used to be annoyingly political.....until I took a cliched projectile to the knee :(
Lawfish66 2 months ago
@Lawfish66 I feel your pain. If Doctor Paul does not get elected we will all take a genuine hit in the ass. Just so you know, the senate voted away your fourth amendment right today. I wonder if you'll miss it? Its past time to for everyone to be political, annoying or not. Your freedom is fading away.
TheNewFourthEstate 2 months ago
@TheNewFourthEstate Dude, everyone always promises all this political bull and yet none of it ever comes into reality. If we elect anyone then we're all fucked, regardless of whether or not our freedom is slipping away. No man in America who runs for President ever has had good intentions for the common man; just all about them. Thats why I don't vote. Everyone's a dick today. All you can do is just roll with the flow.
Lawfish66 2 months ago
@Lawfish66 It'd probably be even worse without a President though. they do SOME things that do justice, but most of it is bullshit, i agree.
Fenixzification 2 months ago
Rothbardian Dubstep is the best.
STAB1L 2 months ago 44
@STAB1L For sure. Haha. Everyone who likes this songs message should read "For A New Liberty."
@Wrighjac There's other candidates besides Ron Paul?
DJBlueDreamMusic 2 months ago 3
Im so down for a revolution... who's with me?
cksox1 2 months ago 8
Ron Paul 2012! Fuck yea
wrighjac 2 months ago 59
Love this so much
darkpatriotx 2 months ago
rabble rabble rabble!!!!
Forget the gilgmecs!!
theace 2 months ago
I liked this song before Gawker decided to practice poor journalism.
mattvgold 2 months ago 2
@mattvgold So... before Gawker existed?
VolkOseba 2 months ago
hell yes
mixinrecrds 2 months ago
NASTY
Solkovsky 2 months ago
Tell The State what you think! Donate December 16th to the Ron Paul money bomb. ronpaul 2012 dot com
BobAkimbo 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
RON PAUL 2012!
Erikrhino9 2 months ago
Dubstep + Anti-government sentiments.
Have I died and gone to anarchist heaven?
jaimekid2 2 months ago 8
i farted when the bass drop came and it sounded so good with the song, OMG next famous dubstep right here, just gotta record another fart
XodusFX 2 months ago
1:50 <--- Free drop button :)
BamaManTexasFan 2 months ago 2
Blap blap!
AnarchoCapitalistTV 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Ron Paul will be dropping dubs of truth all day in the white house. Ron Paul 2012! Like a boss!
CODScumBags 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
RON PAUL 2012.
moartoad 2 months ago
Taxation is a medieval tactic and policy... and this is still in current rule.
cogwheel756 2 months ago
@cogwheel756 I think taxation is quite a bit older than the medieval times...
god0fgod 2 months ago
@god0fgod Hello matt
NumberOneSam 2 months ago
drop it like a BOSS
Blackenedin92 2 months ago
porter is sooooo doooopppe
shawnlaurin 3 months ago
Rothbard's pretty nasty ;)
2daewoo4u 3 months ago
nigga s only 19
edco20 3 months ago
If i were a video game Final Boss this would be my theme With out the dude saying "The state and stuff" but other than that.....Come at me.
TheGlock80 3 months ago
Did Jeff Riggenbach authorize this use of his voice? I bet not, and I bet that's how he would've wanted it.
TotalAnomy 3 months ago 43
The State, the government, the supreme, the eternal, the aggressor against the persons and property of the mass of the public, all states, everywhere, whether democratic, dictatorial, or monarchical, whether red, white, blue or brown.
For centuries the State has robbed people at bayonet point and called it “taxation.”, For centuries the State has enslaved people into its armed battalions and called it “conscription”
The State...
bandrsox 3 months ago 39
@bandrsox The state, run and bought by the private institutions you wish to empower further by eliminating a legal framework and governing body that provides a system of accountability and stability. You're a moron, and your gene pool should be cleansed.
ethnicallyamerican 2 months ago
@ethnicallyamerican So you think MORE government is necessary when you readily admit to it being run by the very private institutions you despise? Big businesses WRITE their own regulations, all MORE regulation does is handicap small businesses. You're fighting against your own cause.
VolkOseba 2 months ago
Comment removed
ethnicallyamerican 2 months ago
Comment removed
ethnicallyamerican 2 months ago
@VolkOseba Please re-read my critique of libertarian society. What I suggested was a ban on private contributions to political campaigns and politicians in general, as well as the implementation of an electoral system where public funds are allocated to candidates to fight for both election and re-election, once they qualify for the ballot (which, in this case, would require a certain amount of signatures from registered voters). A legal framework is required to achieve this.
ethnicallyamerican 2 months ago
@ethnicallyamerican So you want to abolish property rights and the right to free speech?
VolkOseba 2 months ago
Comment removed
ethnicallyamerican 2 months ago
@VolkOseba The absence of laws to punish such behavior or prevent corporatist policies from being forged ultimately births such a system. A libertarian-capitalist system emphasizes freedom of individuals and economic actors, and a minimal role of the state to regulate these entities. Since liberty is guaranteed to such an extreme degree, they are able to construct these corrupt, self-serving systems by building it through policy, since there is no precedent saying they cannot. Comprehend?
ethnicallyamerican 2 months ago
@bandrsox For a New Liberty written by Murray Rothbard
sWingaNinja 2 months ago
I want the words!
holy1shura 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
EVERYONE LISTEN UP
descent Music Listeners, you rock
On 28th NOVEMBER we will all be visiting Justin Biebers "One Time" video
which has over 160 million views.
On that day everyone must flag, leave a negative comment and dislike the video.
Help us destroy this modern autotune music that has ruled the world. The goal is to make the dislike bar bigger than the like bar.
Copy and paste this to good vids:ANYTHING GOOD! Thumbs up this plan. THUMBS IT UP!
number97issexy 3 months ago in playlist Liked videos
Comment removed by the feds
FreestylaBoy 3 months ago 7
@FreestylaBoy ya think they call themselves feds?:D
TheVaizo 3 months ago
This trac is Nectar. keep it up P.R.
ThePolytic 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Look at the top two comments. Back to mine. Back to the top two. Now back to mine. Sadly, they aren't mine. But if you stopped handing out thumbs up so freely, they could LOOK like mine. Look down, back up, where are you? Watching in awe as this comment gains thumbs up. look down, now back up. I have it, the ability to gain thumbs up by posting something so simple-minded. Look again, people copying and pasting my comment to other videos.
Anything is possible on YouTube
11proton 3 months ago
The "State" is conducting endless war against us aka "the war on drugs", we have more troops on the border of pakistan and Afganistan than we do on our own TX/Mexico where people are getting kidnapped and executed by drug cartels.
hpmathis4 3 months ago
great song
tomek2915 3 months ago
"In fact, if you wish to know how libertarians regard the State and any of its acts, simply think of the State as a criminal band, and all of the libertarian attitudes will logically fall into place." - To finish the paragraph.
Esoparagon 3 months ago 11
Dammit someone got to remixing Jeff Riggenbachs voice before I did.
sharperguy 3 months ago 4
Reminds me of the Mother's of Invention.
tinydancer1965 3 months ago
I personally believe this is terrible, and I will go into great details using music theory, chord, and rhythm analysis as to why you are an idiot for liking this music. But I would never force my views of music onto other people like a communist would, I'll just pester the fuck out of them until they realize that their taste in music is a numbing mental disorder.
ThePurelogic 3 months ago
@ThePurelogic I believe the Subjective theory of value so even though I don't like the music I recognize that other people may and the analytically tools that I have that show how the music is terrible only work in reference to my own values.
LatteJonny 3 months ago 13
@LatteJonny this is the greatest answer I've ever heard on youtube in regards to musical taste and the subjective value theory. Thank god there are people out there that understand this concept.
chrystianshayne 3 months ago
@LatteJonny Subjective till I get to them.
ThePurelogic 3 months ago
@ThePurelogic Musical aesthetics are non-cognitive. Your musical theory and other technical analyses are post-rationalizations and nothing more.
Esoparagon 3 months ago
sweet, fuck the state and the god damn military. peace, love and anarcy
digitallando 3 months ago 5
The 12 members of the Super Congress disliked this.
shaq26 3 months ago 9
@shaq26 make that 13.
papiskmuse 3 months ago
an-cap <3
JumpinJesuits 3 months ago 4
If anyone is wondering, he's sampling the audiobook of Murray Rothbard's "For A New Liberty: The Libertarian Manifesto", read by Jeff Rigenbach.
dslkflkdsfskldfj 3 months ago 10
@dslkflkdsfskldfj I listened to the entire thing. I've grown to love this mans voice.
sharperguy 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
RON PAUL 2012!!!
zokilavabe 3 months ago
1:51 simply kicks ass...
YJohannM 3 months ago
For a New Liberty!
alexsaysyourcool 3 months ago 6
Rothbard ftw. Awesome.
Wesker1982 3 months ago 9
LIBERTARIAN DUBSTEP! MY LIFE IS COMPLETE!
waremi51 3 months ago 27
@waremi51 HALLELUJAH PORTER IS A LIBERTARIAN!
kwnnlhs 3 months ago 4
LOL...young people are getting exposed to truth...In spite of the indoctrination of 13 years of forced enslavement. Shiver in fear, Ruling Class...WE are coming for you...With ideas on Liberty; which cannot be overcome.
YJohannM 3 months ago 9
hahaha, this is amazing.
bugsbugmenot 3 months ago
i dont see what is so great about this track
chuckieboy1988 3 months ago
this dude is 19
chuckieboy1988 3 months ago
The Great Lie of our age: taxation is necessary. Taxation is extortion. Voluntary, privatized security and arbitration services are the alternative. Anarcho-capitalism is the future.
SpykerSpeed 3 months ago 166
@SpykerSpeed What is your opinion on the regulation of corporations and other private institutions? For example, what would you want to happen if a factory was considering dumping its mercury waste into a river instead of installing expensive filtration systems?
How would you stop a collusion of companies from forming an oppressive monopoly over services?
Alectr0n 3 months ago
@Alectr0n What happens when a river runs between two nations and a factory upstream was polluting the river's water as it runs into the other country? Do the two nations go to war? No, of course not. The "cost" associated with this is too high. Similarly, in anarchy, property rights are naturally enforced as cultural norm. Mature adults resolve disputes peacefully, because not doing this is reputation-suicide. Here's a video you might like: watch?v=nOBD6v8g1F4
SpykerSpeed 3 months ago 3
Comment removed
Misesrocks 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Alectr0n The already have formed an oppressive monopoly over services; this monopoly is called the State :P
Misesrocks 3 months ago 2
@SpykerSpeed My name is Andrew Ryan -- and I'm here to ask you a question. Is a man not entitled to the sweat of his brow? No says the man in Washington -- it belongs to poor. No, says the man in Vatican -- it belongs to God. No says the man in Moscow -- it belongs to the state.
SirDeathboot 3 months ago
@SpykerSpeed explain what this means???
thefuzzmaster69 3 months ago
@thefuzzmaster69 Search on YouTube for videos by Nielsio and Grahampwright. They explain how a voluntary society can function without a government. Books on the subject include "The Machinery of Freedom" by David Friedman and "For a New Liberty" by Murray Rothbard. These guys are economists who explain how all government functions can be privatized.
SpykerSpeed 3 months ago
the only reason why they are taxing us is for the military and to get out of debt
XxWolfpack247xX 3 months ago
@SpykerSpeed What incentive would private organizations have to arbitrate fairly?
NeverSTFUproductions 2 months ago
@NeverSTFUproductions The intense competition present in a truly free market would ensure the greatest possible quality at the lowest possible cost. This concept is especially true for security and dispute resolutions services, as no justice-seeking consumer is going to purchase the services of a firm with a reputation for bias, injustice, or poor quality of service. Such a firm would quickly lose its economic viability and fail. The market is a beautifully self-regulating spontaneous order.
KnottheGun 2 months ago 2
@KnottheGun But who would hire the firm? Both disagreeing parties agree on one firm? Is there not a serious danger of someone hiring hitmen to invoke revenge on someone they had a dispute with instead of seeking fair justice? It could easily be organized without public knowledge, no face would be lost.
Thanks for your rage-free reply.
NeverSTFUproductions 2 months ago
@NeverSTFUproductions While I cannot obviously know what exact form a free society would take, I can surmise answers to a few of your questions. It seems likely to me that in the absence of a state coercive monopoly on justice services, most people would purchase a form of insurance to ensure the safety of their persons and property. These insurance firms would provide: personal security, if the client felt the need to be well-protected; arbitration/dispute resolution, if the client came into...
KnottheGun 2 months ago
@NeverSTFUproductions conflict with another individual/firm; and reimbursement for any property damage or medical expenses incurred. Individuals could customize their specific "justice package" based on their perceived needs. With that being said, such firms would likely contract with other firms and independent third parties to ensure fair arbitration of disputes and justice for all parties involved. There is, of course, the danger of some people choosing to secretly hire hitmen, but that...
KnottheGun 2 months ago
@NeverSTFUproductions possibility is just as likely, if not more likely, in today's corrupt "justice system."
And, thank you for your curiosity. I am always happy to explain my position and help others understand what I advocate.
KnottheGun 2 months ago
@KnottheGun I appreciate that you have made me investigate and ponder things, something I'm always looking for. Have a good one.
NeverSTFUproductions 2 months ago
@SpykerSpeed and anarcho-capitalism will eventually evolve into a resource based economy.
DustinisKingforever 2 months ago
@SpykerSpeed When you privatize everything, it creates a greater rift of welfare between people. Should we have no laws to govern these private institutions? You think that's a sensible decision? History has shown this does not work beyond a communal level, and you think this would work in a nation of 300+ million people of vastly varying demographics? It's funny how libertardians want fundamental laws to protect liberties but don't want to cough up the money to pay for the defense of such laws.
ethnicallyamerican 2 months ago
10 government mules didn't like this song.
SneakySockPuppet 3 months ago 86
Awesome song, awesome message. This libertarian approves. There are moral absolutes, people: theft is wrong whether done by a individual or done by a group of individuals with nice, shiny badges. The State has brought more hate, enslavement and death across the world more than any institution. Free exchange, voluntary action, and self ownership are the bane of the State. Read up on Mises, Bastiat and Rothbard for a perspective not fed to you by government schools.
libertyguerilla 3 months ago 10
@libertyguerilla Excellent, brother. WE are not alone...not by a long shot.
YJohannM 3 months ago
@libertyguerilla YES
peaceinliberty 3 months ago
While I often hear the Rothbard argument about the state being a band of criminals and taxation is theft (and I agree) these arguments fall on deaf ears to statists on the left and right because they believe that we are free to vote in or out our elected officials and thus have a say in our system of taxation. This is only true if we had truly competitive elections and candidates chosen not by the media. Unfortunately, we do not, thus taxation is still theft but for this reason also.
esperan2k 3 months ago
@esperan2k The problem is that in a true capitalist society, where economic actors are free to act as they please without constraints imposed by the state, they can virtually buy elections, as they are doing now (except they are less free to do so, but hey, in a libertarian society, more corruption for everyone when those regulations are removed!).
ethnicallyamerican 2 months ago
@ethnicallyamerican The problem is private funding of elections that basically determines policy creation and election results. The only way to totally prevent this is to have public funding of elections through taxation, where candidates receive equal funding for campaigns, a ban on political tv advertisements, and a ban on private campaign contributions. If you want a true libertarian society, then you support selling government to the highest bidder, at a higher degree than we are seeing now.
ethnicallyamerican 2 months ago
@ethnicallyamerican This is false. The reason the elections are bought is corporatism, where the government doesn't allow true free market capitalism. If we had an actual free market, buying a politician wouldn't help you against competitors, as they cannot affect the economy for you.
carlb86 2 months ago
@carlb86 False. In a true capitalist society, private businesses can pay to craft legislation which favors them, which is why capitalist societies ultimately turn into corporatist societies. Not only this, but even if this were so, a company that makes tens of billions can eventually assimilate and purchase other companies, which is the essence of monopoly creation. Lets see how fast it takes for the US to become a Wal-Mart and Koch oligarchical wasteland.
ethnicallyamerican 2 months ago
Comment removed
ethnicallyamerican 2 months ago
@ethnicallyamerican You really don't understand. An oligopoly or monopoly cannot exist without government creating barriers of entry.
Capitalism has done more to enrich and raise our standard of living than any other system.
carlb86 2 months ago 4
@carlb86 This is not true at all, actually. There are several factors that can foster the growth of a monopoly that have absolutely nothing do with government interference. The government, can, however, make it much easier for a monopoly to be created. Strategies such as dumping, price fixing, exclusive dealing and limit pricing are all viable options that can be used to either crush competitors or discourage entry into a market, and none require government involvement to be utilized.
ethnicallyamerican 2 months ago
@ethnicallyamerican It's not merely capitalism, but a marriage of capitalism and socialism which has given us the blessings of economic growth and more wealth for all. However, when the system is abused, and when regulations are removed or too many are instituted, then that is when it is broken and needs to be repaired.
ethnicallyamerican 2 months ago
@ethnicallyamerican example?
redbe1975 2 months ago
@redbe1975 google 'asias man of the century'
ruthlessandevil 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@carlb86 Many people have historical amnesia and forget that government was expanded to regulate private economic actors because the people widely demanded them. This is why labor movements existed. Destroy the government, and we'll all be wage slaves getting paid as much as Chinese sweat shop workers (say hello to early 20th century America, once again!).The costs of living were too high, and the pay was too low.
ethnicallyamerican 2 months ago
@ethnicallyamerican In fact, with the institution of regulations and more extensive services, more people ascended to higher economic status than they did with the lack thereof. History books help, I would recommend one.
ethnicallyamerican 2 months ago
@ethnicallyamerican In a capitalist society, it is easy for politicians to shift to a corporatist system, since there are no laws in the first place to prevent one from developing. The essence of a capitalist philosophy is freedom, and when there are no regulations to block that sort of legislation from being drafted, it makes it both legal and simple to institute, since there are no repercussions for doing so and it benefits the legislators, whom get complimentary pay from interest groups.
ethnicallyamerican 2 months ago
the intawebs. praise allah.
"For centuries the State has robbed people at bayonet point and called it 'taxation.' In fact, if you wish to know how libertarians regard the State and any of its acts, simply think of the State as a criminal band, and all of the libertarian attitudes will logically fall into place."
thus spoke a career state parasite. true nonetheless.
hate this music, but go, man, go.
2ndAsstJizzMopper 3 months ago
Fabulous!
d1ricks 3 months ago
I'm no fan of this genre of music. I can't stand it, actually. The MESSAGE, however, is what brought me here. I never expected to hear Murray Rothbard's wisdom put to music, but here it is.
If this appeals to you, you might want to check out mises.org.
th7700 3 months ago 4
this is amazing. The lyric samples explain the basic premise of anarcho-capitalism. Porter Robinson is clearly a man of my own heart.
fragilityh14 3 months ago 4
Someone needs to take some HUGE speakers with ground breaking bass to Occupy Wallstreet, and blast this while getting in fights with the cops who are using police brutality.
Leigax 3 months ago 7
Omg this track is FUCKING SICK!!
dxtr0 3 months ago 3
Machinima Music Videos: Battlefield 3
ThePsychoStyle 3 months ago
The remix is sex, yes, but this is also very good. I think more people should appreciate fluid songs instead of filthy drops. AH WTF am I saying I sound like a hipster I'll just shut up.
TheMorozovChannel 3 months ago
its sad that the remix has more views than this
homieg186 3 months ago
United we are strong
United we are enslaved
United we shall die
jakoson7 3 months ago
REVOLUTION NOW!!!!!!!!!
spacemuffins1234 3 months ago
FUCK THE STATE 1:51
ccolindick 4 months ago 2
God people, can we stop arguing about Occupy Wall Street and just enjoy the music?
RoseWhip411 4 months ago
HO GOD!
SpAC3CaKee 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
There's a reason why I'm an Individualist.
dreamshooter90 4 months ago
fckn hard
cecaci58 4 months ago
Occupy Wall Street, We want America Back!!!!
FreestylaBoy 4 months ago 8
@FreestylaBoy OMG!! STFU!!! THE STATE YA DUMBASS....why occupy wall street?!?! they are mostly men and women that define the prosperity of america. the only reason why they are involved in national issue because it is the state and military that allowed it. government today is bigger than ever before. those people occupying wall street look like a bunch of IDIOTS and are being laughed at!!
Gold3nStat3KiD 4 months ago
@FreestylaBoy What, so you fucks can control America and set up a communist state? I think not.
CheddarCheezus 4 months ago
@CheddarCheezus you must be rich then I'd assume?
thefuzzmaster69 4 months ago
@thefuzzmaster69 No, just informed.
CheddarCheezus 4 months ago
@CheddarCheezus Why wouldn't you want to share the wealth, didn't your mother ever tell you sharing is good? the difference between what they want and what communism is, is that in a communist society there is a leader that decides how people are to be treated which is usually bad, What the protesters want is for the people to run the country and equality for all.
thefuzzmaster69 4 months ago
@thefuzzmaster69 I don't think you fully understand socialism. Sharing the wealth means that people who work hard have to give their money to people who don't. That's not equal at all. And the government is going to do this for you. That's not run by the people either.
CheddarCheezus 4 months ago
@CheddarCheezus Well it's my own opinion but i think that anybody who works is contributing to society and deserves equal treatment, Just because you're working at Mcdonalds flipping burgers, it doesn't mean that you should be barely getting by while someone who sits at a desk as a CEO of a large company has more money then he needs and let's it sit in his bank account when other people need it. Also the government is run by the people in a democratic society, people have the choice by voting.
thefuzzmaster69 4 months ago
@thefuzzmaster69 Oh really? Someone who doesn't do anything except flip burgers at McDonalds should get the money of a CEO who worked hard to get to that position? I don't think so. I'm sure you would feel the same way if you were that CEO.
CheddarCheezus 4 months ago
@CheddarCheezus If I was a CEO and I had Millions or billions of dollar I would use maybe 200,00 a year to live, I don't need all that money, There's more important things to life then money. Really how hard earned is there money anyways? I'm talking the rich 1 % here, most of their companies were passed on through Their family. Also if you were so informed I'm sure that you would know how corrupt this capatilist society is
thefuzzmaster69 4 months ago
@thefuzzmaster69 Capitalism is the greatest system of economy that a country could utilize. It gives everyone the chance to go out and if they work hard, succeed and make a lot of money. But the people who are either too lazy and don't want to work end up poor and living on the street. And that's how it should be. The lazy shouldn't be given anything, they should suffer for the choices they made.
CheddarCheezus 4 months ago
@CheddarCheezus You realize that most of the people who are on the street are their because they have an addiction or mental or physical disabilities, you sick fuck you should go hang yourself