Slower?? No and never! If it should be a Beethoven, so it has to be fast! At the first counterpoint at 0.56 is not enough power. I know that this piece is very difficould to play, so every interpretation must be a masterpiece, but a little faster, and more power (more Beethoven ^^) and it would be gorgeous.
@90Einstein I have a different one (by same ensemble) that I think is about perfect. This is the second Beethoven cycle they recorded. So, it's like "What are they going to just play it perfect again?"
and yeah i have to agree that there are parts where the tempo could be a bit slower, but it is the best interpretation i heard, even though i don't especially like how it begins but the version i found dose not have a birliant neither.
a good interpretation of this string quartet is very hard to find! i have 19 different interpretations and every one have "something" that dose not fit write, it either is the first notes, the beginning of the composition either a special part at the end witch almost in every song that i have sounds completely awful! (the part from 13'20''-13'50'' if u look at my clip on youtube) and then its the tempo, etc.
Slower?? No and never! If it should be a Beethoven, so it has to be fast! At the first counterpoint at 0.56 is not enough power. I know that this piece is very difficould to play, so every interpretation must be a masterpiece, but a little faster, and more power (more Beethoven ^^) and it would be gorgeous.
90Einstein 6 months ago
@90Einstein I have a different one (by same ensemble) that I think is about perfect. This is the second Beethoven cycle they recorded. So, it's like "What are they going to just play it perfect again?"
keimica 6 months ago
Don't feel that you have to say sorry for the sound quality. It's very enjoyable. Every voice can be heard clearly!
wawa314159 1 year ago
@wawa314159 thanks, ill erase it then
keimica 1 year ago
Too slow in the intro and opening section.
musicalidea 1 year ago
@musicalidea To me it's not about fast or slow. I often wish they would play a lot of songs slower to savor it. It's about nuance (I'm just saying).
keimica 1 year ago
@keimica "songs"....?? *sigh*
PaulTortelier 6 months ago
@PaulTortelier boo!
mikatagahara1212 4 months ago
and yeah i have to agree that there are parts where the tempo could be a bit slower, but it is the best interpretation i heard, even though i don't especially like how it begins but the version i found dose not have a birliant neither.
gxgfree4rhyme 3 years ago
a good interpretation of this string quartet is very hard to find! i have 19 different interpretations and every one have "something" that dose not fit write, it either is the first notes, the beginning of the composition either a special part at the end witch almost in every song that i have sounds completely awful! (the part from 13'20''-13'50'' if u look at my clip on youtube) and then its the tempo, etc.
gxgfree4rhyme 3 years ago
The Lindsay performance is the I've been used to with op130.
starry2006 2 years ago
the tempo could be a little slower sometimes i mean, but they play it great
keimica 3 years ago
yeah you are write! its a great interpretation, i love it!
gxgfree4rhyme 3 years ago
maybe the tempo could be a little faster here and there but they play it great
keimica 3 years ago