Added: 3 years ago
From: olbywatch
Views: 38,231
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (794)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Rachel Madthing. now that is a man in womens body. yikes. shivers. upchuck. vomit inducer.

  • neither keith or ann would exist if it werent for the other. it s aparadox really but if either one of them were to die, the other would simply dematerialize. fox/msnbc olbermann/coulter republican/democrat... two sides of the same coin.

  • So. Being a woman is bad? This woman is the most ignorant, vulgar, brain-damaged human i've ever seen.

  • Ann Coulter is a man. If she was a Democrat she'd have the operation but since she's a Republican he/she douchebag she can't. She just flaps her gums to make a buck anyway. fuck Ann Coulter. anybody who takes her seriously should go see Michele Bachman's husband for counseling. Maybe he can cure you. He cured himself from acting out on his gay impulses so he must know something. Ann Coulter doesn't.

  • @MindGroper Actually, we all know things you dont. Dropping F bombs in your rant makes you less credible.

  • @Mark6024 Wow do you know how to cure gays too? What else do you know. Calling other people's posts rants is a dead giveaaway of someone who can't string more than a couple of sentences together. Why the snottery? Do you actually think Ann Coulter has a point other than media whoring and cash cowing her socially dysfunctional persona for the angry everywhere?

  • @Mark6024 and not saying anything but relying on sarcasm and verbal etiquette makes you incredible. So you win cause I'd rather be incredible than less credible.

  • coulter needs surgery, she is a terrible excuse of writer.

  • @MadVladmcPantz Meanwhile, she's a multimillionaire and here you are on youtube whining a/b it.

  • @frankdrebin Im not whining, I find it funny that you sit here defending this fugly bitch. She's a millionare cause right wing dipshits buy her books of bullshit.

  • @MadVladmcPantz Name a liberal that's intelligently debated her. You can't because she makes everyone look like an idiot. I'm not even a conservative and I can see that.

  • @frankdrebin Bill Maher, Keith Oberman, even that bitch Katie Couric made her look like an ass. Her old college debated her and made her look like a complete dunce. And you happen to be an idiot if you bleive this stuck up bitch is anyway intelligent.

  • @MadVladmcPantz All those people you named are good on their own turf. Maher has a show full of cheerleaders and never deals w/ any substance, just talking points and one liners.The fact Coulter goes on their turf and makes them look like idiots by out debating them w/ facts, which they can never deal with, speaks to her intelligence.

  • @frankdrebin actually no Maher has gone on other people''s turf and debated them, Coulter happens to just be a writer she doesnt have own show, Maher happens to have a show so he invites people to discuss their views coulter has been on his show numerous times.

  • It's amazing seeing the names that liberals call strong opinionated women. I am never ceased to be amazed by the lefts hypocrisy...and lack of critical thinking skills.

  • @mrtapoche1 Please don't tempt her...for all of our sake.

  • Ann puts the cunt in cuntentious, she puts the cunt in cuntrol...

    she puts the dick in redickulous, and puts the ass in asshole.™©®

  • she's disgusting!!!

  • OOOOO That Adam's Apple. Olberman has asked Coulter on his show many times and she refused.

    Rush said he hopes Obama fails and to the asshole who runs this channel get cancer.

  • God Bless Ann Coulter!!!

  • @loveclevelandohio1 ...that was a Joke... right?

    This cuntrag doesn't actually have fans... right?

  • @thevoiceofreasonRx5 Ann Coulter has more fans than Olberdick and that pussy Mahar does. Their knees are firmly planted in front of mr.obama's dick. 

  • @loveclevelandohio1 LOL that's like saying one Fat Chick has slightly less pubic hair than another Fat Chick. They both lose in the game of life anyway.

    I fucking hate Olberman... he is repulsive filth, but Cuntler is no better. She is a complete and utter fucking embarrassment.

  • Hanging on the words of a radio personality is kind of pathetic imo. How does what Limbaugh thinks of Obama rate in everyones book?. Obama stands for things Limbaugh does not agree with so of course he does'nt want him to change America into Obama's image.

    But small minds want to immediately throw around names and labels.

  • This woman really needs to die....

  • @waltermcbobom Needs to die? You're a typical liberal.

  • @jdeweyhs Liberal / Conservative ... same shit, wake up buddy. Both parties fuck us over the same, no point in distinguishing them.. Ann Coulter just made me realise how fucking radical politics can make people.

  • @waltermcbobom

    While I agree with what you're trying to say, what you meant to say was "Democrat/Republican ... same shit...". Liberalism and conservativism are the ideologies that unite people under the political affiliations of "Democrat/Republican", but what the conservatives know and the liberals don't is that all politicians are scumbags and can't be trusted, so they should have as little power as possible.

  • I think the vote in November signified Limbaugh's correct analysis of Obama. We hope through his policies and HIS vision of what America should be would fail. Obama has succeeded in his first couple years(Obamacare, the debt, the unemployment), and the people have spoken against him.

  • I'm pretty sure that it was someone on the right who spoke out against Limbaugh's comments that the president should "fail" if, in fact, he did say that.

  • The FOX Commentator is wrong (again, no surprise). Limbaugh, in one of his earliest interviews with Hannity just after Obama became the 44th president did say "I want this President to fail".

    I guess it was more convenient for them to lie. Also, if anyone doesn't believe me I encourage you to ask me for proof, because I have it.

  • GOD I hate this bitch. I mean, I love her, too, yes, I love Ann Coulter to death (non-romantically), I mean, she's rly nice, happy, funny, and a good person and all that, but my god! When she starts talking politics, she sounds like someone who's grown up in an imaginary fairy-tale land where Fox News ran Nazi Germany...in AMERICA!

    She's by FAR the *worst* of the Fox personalities, but you can tell she thinks she's being sweet, at least! Poor girl...

  • @CorrosionX3

    Hey, *I* can't either, but, then again, ALL conservatives scare the hell outta me! (lol) They are, by definition, too dumb for their own good. ESPECIALLY now.

    I can't *wait* until 2012! The Republicans are gonna get CREAMED, and it's gonna be sweet. ;~)

  • LMAO! MANN-COULTER YOU SHOILD'T BE TALKING YOU HAVE A DISGUSTING ADAM'S APPLE! TRANNY!

  • @Sweepersucksballs You are both ignorant and a bigot. Ann Coulter is a woman. And if she was a man your statement would be homophobic. Let's face it. You're just a leftover who can't handle strong independent conservative women.

  • Absolutely hilarious - GO ANN GO!!!!

  • I watched the leftists roast Republicans and President Bush for six-years, into every slander, ban, dogma, and denial of speech; and it appears someone was finally let out of their egg shell and told to fly in the public, and are really weirded-out that someone noticed. The annoying problem is the race card, that said vote Democrat Party or be a racist, in an open ban on speech for our national elections--Republicans have been openly demonized.

  • The Coulter "man/tranny" comments never get old. Some men are not really ok with sex equality and when they see an incredibly intelligent woman who is completely unafraid of speaking her mind they rage and the only possible solution would be to say shes somehow a man.

    I on the other find intelligent, passionate women incredibly attractive! Ann is not quite my style but her mind has an appeal that can't be denied.

  • really conservatives get ignored if they don't make a ruckus and liberals look terrible when they start complaining about conservative cause they have it all.

  • that tranny is calling olberman a man in womans body? what irony

  • i mean a woman in a mans body..whatever they're both androgynous with they're art and perspective

  • @adrianeaglrck You're just butthurt from your date with her.

  • more like Ann Coulter is a woman in a man's body. gross. amirite?

  • @ibrk4rapture The funny thing is, that's all you liberals have against her. Without fail that same kind of comment is made any time Coulter is on YouTube. How about a little originality at least. I know it's hard to think for yourself instead of using tired rhetoric and old jokes, but give it a shot.

  • @Nixmix24 Mormons are gay

  • @ibrk4rapture I rest my case

  • Comment removed

  • @ibrk4rapture You need to work on your reading comprehension. I didn't call your immature insult, rhetoric. Read the rest of what I said. I said that in place of originality all you have is tired rhetoric and OLD JOKES. You'd probably understand what I was saying if you attended a "shitty mormon school"... or graduated high school.

    BTW, I never went to a "Mormon school" in fact, I was just accepted to Stanford's dental school. You can pretend to be smarter than me when you go to an Ivy League.

  • Comment removed

  • @ibrk4rapture First, yes it does and it's #7 in the nation. Look it up. in fact, I'll look it up and send you the link. (ouch, I know) Second, you can pick apart the syntax all you please but rhetoric was referring to rhetoric and old jokes was referring, obviously, to your old joke about Coulter. Third, that doesn't answer my question. I asked you to show me evidence proving her wrong in this video. Again, reading comprehension. Look into it.

  • @Nixmix24 But, if you must know, the reason I hate Ann Coulter is that she screams for attention, she substitutes incendiary and sensationalism for legitimate argument and thought, she lowers the standard on how we all discuss and approach the problems that face our nation. (To be noted: I hate Olberman for most of the same reasons-- same character on opposite sides of the political spectrum) She is the worst kind of pundit, and I hate you, because you listen to her (and because you're mormon).

  • @ibrk4rapture You can have whatever opinion you please but you should also keep in mind that it's only that, your opinion. Here's where your "tired rhetoric" is starting to shine through. Show me with evidence where she is wrong in this video. You can be a bigot and hate me because of my religion but that doesn't have an effect on me or the truth in Coulter's words that your trying so hard to deny. It's hard to admit you're wrong. It was hard for me to face the music too when I was a liberal too

  • Good job Ann!!! Way to put that faggot in his place - who the hell would watch him anyway?? LOL!

  • We are fast (America) becoming the laughing stock of the world, The whole FNC shtick is getting old, Anns accent add a special comical tone to her comments, what load.

  • lol irony.

  • @hostile 987678, so does your mama....and she swalows...

  • Coulter looks like a fucking christian pornstar that sucks dick for attention.

  • @HOSTILE987678  Coulter -a.k.a Your Mama ?

  • Calling her a "man" is proof positive that the liberal mindset is a pussy one. If I hadn't grown out of my liberalism when my testicles dropped, I wouldn't be so put off by the fact that she could debate my beliefs into the ground that I couldn't easily envision a hot, lanky blonde pivoting on the tilt-o-whirl. Hell, Janine Garafolo's gibberish is as repellent as anthrax, but I could still pile-drive her until she started stammering like Bill Buckley.

  • @adminwrh  L.O.L . ;-D

  • @adminwrh wow...youre a faggot.

  • @Justin851414 - NO I"M NOT! Janine tries as hard as she can NOT to appear like a woman, but strip her down naked and cover those hideous tatoos with some gizmo butter and she could be bonable.

  • If Keith is trapped in a woman's body, then that makes Manncoultergeist a tranny.

  • People have tried denigrating Ann Coulter by calling her "Man Coulter".

    Aside from that being childish, it's also kinda sad: how pathetic do progressives have to be that a fairly pretty conservative woman has to teach liberal males how to act like men, rather than whiny little bitches?

    They only try to go toe-to -toe with her because they're afraid to face off with conservative men, yet they STILL get trounced by her every damned time.

    Somewhere, "sindexter" is now crying himself to sleep...

  • TRUE!!!! Keith Olbermann IS a woman trapped in a man's body. He therefore should get it chopped off ASAP.

  • I noticed that progressives like Bathtub Boy claim to be sensitive to women's issues, but then they engage in the some of the most predatory and sexist behavior. Where is the progressive feminist outrage when Bathtub Boy makes sexist comments about female politicians, columnists, and pundits?

  • Ann Rocks! Period!

  • how does blood flow to hear head?

    also, why does she feel the need to dye her blonde, whats wrong with how brunette's look?

  • Wow Coulter saying "Oldermann is a woman trapped in a mans body!" Horse face Coulter with man hands and grunts and sounds like she or he's got his penis tucked between it's legs.

  • Ann go fuck yourself with a broken bottle !

  • @sindexter Spoken like a true liberal. lol

  • @Libsaresickpeople spoken like a true dumb yank who thinks that people can be grouped so easily. The left right paradigm lie is so childish only americans could take it seriously. 'If your not with us your against us'

    Pathetic

  • @sindexter

    Hey, good job with the grade school-style name calling; ad hominem attacks are the hallmark of the woefully ignorant. But hey, you certainly made an impression on us Americans with your scathing indictment...mainly because you clearly haven't a clue as to what you're talking about.

  • GO ANN GO!!!

  • I would fuck either of them. No idea what they are talking about.

  • The first step to fixing the already too far gone U.S. economy has to be to make the Federal Reserve federally owned. It is a private institution. It's fucking up your economy. Deal with it. Please. You're gonna drag the rest of the world down your economic shithole.

  • I like her. She looks a lil bit like a transvetite though.

  • @USAGymnast As much as I hate Laffer, his curve does work sometimes. lol

  • Wow, someone is insulting a man by calling him a girl, how grade school can you get. And this passes for intelligent commentary? Coulter is a hate filled pig who makes her living pandering to slobs like Olbywatch.

  • HAHA - GOTTA LOVE HER!! GO ANN GO!!!

  • have a fuckin mind of your own

  • "The only 57 year old man trapped in a womans body">.....

    Funny. Ann Coulter is the epitomy of a trans gender. You KNOW she keeps her dick tucked inbetween her leggs when she's in those tight skirts. (Iether that.... or she really IS that fucking butt ugly).

  • Good point, I don't ever remember W mentioning his detractors by name - and he had a lot of them.

  • no we like the truth miss coulter that's some thing you don't like to do.

  • XD ...trapped in a mans body. OMG!

  • Right wingers love free speech....unless that speech is profane or it attacks religion. Bullshit artists.

  • @jons44

    Or if it opposes the leftists views, policies or exposes their hypocrisy.....then the left calls for "regulations". Funny how that works.

  • No one should be surprised that far-left liberals want hard government regulation when then they perceive a statement or message as inappropriate. That's in their DNA. Consertavites used to be about protecting all individual liberties until they hooked up with the narrow religious fringe, which is bullshit because that's not what their values are supposed to entail.

  • Did Ann actually accuse a man of being a women trap in a man's body? With her manly features you think she would leave that alone.

  • she is so fucking ugly

  • This chick is utterly awesome.....GO ANN!!!

  • Fox News and Ann Coulter ? Does anyone actually take these people seriously? Oh yeh, conservatives do and sadly that is what is wrong with this country. Nothing will every really change untill the masses get a clue and stop supporting the conservatives who are picking their pockets while blaming everyone else.. It is a nice trick when it works and in this country of the small minded it works very well.

  • @urparanoia LOL that's so Liberal of you. "A Liberal is a person who will give away everything he doesn't own."

  • @madamalpha -And a conservative is a individual who repeats right wing rhetoric with absolutely no idea what it means. You are such a good sheep.

  • @urparanoia Okay lets start a discussion and see if you actually know ANY of the issues and what it actually means....or are you just a lazy liberal who needs to be told what their opinion is? I do not need the media to tell me what my ideas should be- I still old school it by reading.....for example I've actually read the health care bill...the question have you? Two lefts don't make a right and two rights just make sense ;) ..you're such a good little liberal fool.

  • @madamalpha -I also read. Maybe you should read your own comments prior to posting. You mentioned that we should start a discussion but you failed to do so and as conservatives often do you didn't get beyond name calling. Much of what goes on in politics is simply common sense and knowledge of the two parties ideology. For instance it is no secret that conservatives dislike entitlements yet during the Dubya years they passed the biggest entitlement in decades. Do you know the reason why ?

  • @urparanoia I guess the only opinion you are allowed to have is one that is given to you by a Liberal out of a Conservative pocket.

  • @urparanoia Sheep, really...that's funny because your party is the one that supports the major political platforms that the NAZI party ran on in Germany. You Neo-Libs believe any propaganda the DNC feeds you and feel as though you must repeat that stupidity to everyone you know by forcing it down their throats....NAZI !!

  • @KB3MMX -Actually you could not be more wrong regarding dems and the Nazi party but people often use such rhetoric when they have nothing of substance. I have heard this argument on various occasion. It was conservatives prior to the Iraq invasion which used the tactics of the third riech as explained by Nazi leader Herman Goering regarding leaders doing the bidding of the people by using scare tactics and claiming dissenters were unpatriotic. Now I'm giving you a chance to explain your comment

  • @urparanoia Actually, I'm completely right because you're the party that believes in total government domination of everything as a "solution". Environmental activism, workers "rights", etc is a cover for your party to allot the Government to get their grips on everything anyone does. Your "Tolerance", "Equality" and so called "freedoms" that the DNC campaigns on are TOTAL lies just like all the broken campaign promises of the Dictator in chief, Obama. You people are total Hypocrits!!

  • @KB3MMX-Your words are little more then hyperbole. You still have not defended your comment regarding democrats and the Nazi party. Do you not realize that such nonsense has been used by conservative for decades ? Repeating baseless right wing rhetoric is not a indication of intelligence but instead is quite the opposite. Dems have been in power many times over the years and we have not lost our guns, become a communist nation or been rounded up by the Gestapo.Are you really that out of touch ?

  • @urparanoia

    You're out of touch if you buy into and spew that DNC rhetoric. It's funny in a way because almost everything the say is total lies! Brainwash by the DNC and Corporate politicians, you should try something new like thinking for yourself about how big government power has NEVER been the solution throughout history.

  • @urparanoia Conservatives are the only defense against the modern NAZI party(the DNC) !! The modern DNC supports almost everything that the NAZI's ran on in Germany!

  • @urparanoia Prior to claiming it was conservatives who began with entitlements why don't you actually find out when and where they started who spun the first rhetoric prior to assuming it was the conservatives. You will need to go back "to the new deal" why don't you find out the reason congress passed term limits after FDR. I'm sure your far left teachings will come up with a doozie to recant.

  • @madamalpha -Who said that conservatives began the entitlement programs ? Read my comments again and this time pay attention.

  • I think both Coulter and Olberman are extremists

  • How self-loathing...using "woman" as an insult.

  • @melvega24 Hey retard, using "woman" isn't an insult, calling a male a "woman" is! GET IT RETARD?

  • ha this woman is the devil.

  • ann coulter is a living legend!!! she is so hot too!!

  • @megaead69 legend? in what sense?

  • It is strange how the left (the voice of the people) want to shut down free speech. Strange how the Republicans seem to be the voice of free speech. Amazing how they HATE people who disagree.

  • @flobrew

    Exactly, the LEFTist commies HATE and DESTROY anyone on their way to keep and increase power. The DNC hosts the biggest political HYPOCRITES !! Look at Pelosi's "Ethical" congress, LOL !!

  • @KB3MMX-Repeating right wing rhetoric and name calling do not equal intelligence. If you have something of substance to offer please do so.

  • @urparanoia Here's the difference dear, there is a hundred ways to call someone an @ss hole without ever using the word. Because you choose not to use the terminology does not equate to the reader understanding EXACTLY what you are saying. So instead of attempting to climb on an intellectual pedestal that you have been called on, why not bring the issue to the table and discuss it. Do you know why term limits were called for after FDR?

  • @madamalpha -If the shoe fits? I approach a commenter as though their intelligence is equal to or exceeds my own.Simply because they disagree does not make them more or less of a person. We have little idea as to who we are corresponding. However there are those who have a great deal of one liners but no substance and it soon becomes obvious that such individuals are out of their league.I see you avoided my question.That could bring me to various conclusions but i will not go there at this point

  • @urparanoia Then do NOT stand on ceremony and attempt to make yourself greater than you are. You repeat the foolish and unfounded and unsubstantiated comments when looked at closely carry no substance. You seem to act as an offended party while striking the first blow. If you are unable to take it after it has been served up simply learn NOT to serve it up. Many liberals tend to repeat the same non sense over and over never understand the subject matter at all.

  • @madamalpha-You use a great many words but offer nothing of substance. You fail to answer questions which lead me to believe that you are unable to defend your position. I cannot speak for others only myself. Certainly there are many conservatives and liberals with little understanding of what is actually going on around them and sadly it is they who are the very reason this country is circling the drain. If you have something of substance to say then please do so-I enjoy a good debate.

  • @madamalpha-Originally I responded to your comments because I did not agree. As I see it your comment that I saw initially was the "first blow". I certainly was not offended but I did give you a chance to defend your position which you chose not to do. When commenting on a public forum such as You Tube you can say what you please but you shouldn't be suprised when someone asks you to defend your position.

  • @urparanoia Forgive me if I forgot what the question was after all it only took you a WEEK to respond. As far as a healthy debate I'm up for it. I see by other posts are still spewing your left wing radical view points and attempting to call all others "tools" It really is so very liberal of you. You have no substance to contribute so you refer to name calling.. LOL

  • @madamalpha-Didn't realize there was a time limit for responding to comments. I was out of town on business for a few days. Do you not realize that past comments are available for viewing?Actually I didn't have to go back very far to find my question to you. Is it possible that the answer to my question regarding the unfunded entitlement passed by conservatives will actually show that conservatives do not practice what they preach ?

  • @urparanoia I didn't realize you needed THAT much time to respond. Shall we schedule a response for let say next week or next month. You have to realize not only are you NOT the only person I am having a conversation with the mail received on it is deleted. If you are incapable of repeating the question perhaps it is simply because you are concerned I will have an answer that you will be unable to refute.

  • @madamalpha I think you're right, given the current path of the DNC, it's undeniable they are running on similar platforms.

  • @madamalpha -It doesn't matter if your mail was deleted just go to the comments section and scroll down. If my question is not there go to the next page. It is as simple as that. It may have taken me a minute, two at the most. In the time you have taken to complain you could have done this many times over. Your comment regarding time to answer it quite lame. It appears that your excuses are fine but my reasons are not. If I was afraid of your answer why would I have asked the question ?? Silly !

  • @urparanoia calling me "a good sheep" is supposed to do what dear? Express to me my ability to draw my own conclusion or mealy prove you are guilty of what you claim others to be?

  • @urparanoia That means alot coming from a Neo-Lib NAZI mouthpiece.

  • @KB3MMX-At one point in your comments you call dems Nazi and at another you call them communists. Do you not realize that the Nazis did not like communism ? You really have little idea of what you are saying. You have proven without doubt that you have little knowledge regarding political issues and the state of our country. However you are a tool that right wing hate mongers everywhere would be proud of. You are doing your side more harm then good. Keep up the good work.

  • @urparanoia Now that's funny that you shoudl think that as they gained control of every aspect of the citizens life whiel they were in power. Anything they wanted was controlled by the state and rationed as they saw fit. How can you back up the NAZI party....oh,that's right..YOU'RE a DEMOCRAT !!

     Keep up your insanity, and your rightously nutty Left wing CONTROL FREAKS are going to be voted out one by one !

  • @KB3MMX -More hyperbole.I hope that you don't actually believe what you say but are making such ridiculous statements in a effort to manipulate the small minded.You really aren't very well informed regarding communism, the Nazi party , libs, or conservatives.Much of what you say is fundamentally flawed. Maybe at some point you could make a comment that is based in reality.There are way too many individuals in this country who are as misinformed as you.You need to learn the basics my friend.

  • @urparanoia Perhaps you should attempt to read history and discover exactly how the Nazi's took over and make the comparisons prior to attacking conservatives simply because we are capable of seeing the righting on the wall and the similarities. Since you are a liberal..tell me why is it that the president responded to the mining accident 7 days later, the gulf issue 9 days late and do not seem to recall when they discussed Tennessee. Just wondering

  • @madamalpha WELL PUT !!

  • @madamalpha -You are grasping at straws regarding the response to the mining issue. Limbaugh, Beck etc do the same. Conservative wage a ongoing battle for deregulation, less government etc and then complain when Obama does not jump on the mining issue at a moments notice.You can't have it both ways.You people complaining about such issues show that you are willing to try and make libs look bad at every turn of the road but in the end it only serves to show just how little you have going for you.

  • @urparanoia IF the question had any merit you would not have had a problem repeating it. Instead you want me to go through pages and pages to hunt it down. Why would it be so difficult for you to repeat it? If you were truly interested in getting a response you could have very simply asked the question again. Don't feel "special" I was asked something by someone else and missed it. I asked them to repeat it and they did.

  • @urparanoia You are a typical Liberal spending my money and looking for weak and pathetic ways out of an argument you can not seem to substantiate. Always diverting the focus when it could have been resolved had you SIMPLY repeated the question. Don't worry I understand your diversion tactics. Liberals are well known to do that. Stand on ceremony and petter out when it comes time to actually discuss thing intellectually.

  • @madamalpha-Evidently it was too difficult for you to take less time then it took to write your comment and simply do what I did. You people would do anything to avoid the tough questions. As you know conservatives are allways asking the question "what are we going to do about entitlements". My question to you is why did conservatives pass the biggest entitlement in decades with the Medicare Prescription Part D UNFUNDED program which picked the pocket of taxpayers and added to our debt immensely

  • @madamalpha-Ok, I'll do what you could have done in less time then it took for your comment. Conservatives claim to hate entitlements but with a conservative president and congrees they passed a UNFUNDED entitlement program that picks the pocket of taxpayers and added greatly to our debt. The question is WHY ? Contrary to what conservatives claim they are very big spenders. Reagan tripled the debt and Dubya doubled it. Conservative rhetoric does not match their actions. Waiting for your answer.

  • @urparanoia I find it interesting that you conveniently forget we had a Conservative President and LIBERAL congress. The great thing about America is that we do have a checks and balances. As much as I HATE the hatch job h/c bill, it was NOT the president who passed it, it was congress. Unless that was recently changed why would any other administration been different? The BIGGEST entitlement wasn't in any other administration as it is in this one. This monstrosity is sinking the ship.

  • @madamalpha -Better check the timeline on your claims and the legislation in question. For the majority of the time that conservative president was in power congress was controlled by conservatives. I understand why you would like to rewrite history but it just isn't so and if in doubt simply do a little homework for a change and get your facts straight.Remember it is the conservatives who are the party allways complaining about entitlements. Bigger is not the question but being hypocritical is

  • @urparanoia And LOLbama is projected to double the debt in ONE TERM (as projected by the CBO), Bush might have been (and still surely is) a moron but at least Reagan got us out of the recesssion, which definitely won't be happening with Obama. So lets see, next year when the Bush tax cuts expire and the federal gov't starts to recieve much less in revenue because people's incentives will be shifted to keeping unrealized capital gains or other form of untaxed wealth and the economy slows down.

  • @StickyGreenTreez-Reagan tripled the debt, Dubya doubled it and gave us 2 unfunded wars,unfunded tax breaks and the biggest entitlement in decades- also unfunded .Those are facts that we all know and are easily checked.Your trickle down rhetoric is standard conservative speak that simply does not work although conservatives still instinctively chant this nonsense.The conservative debt mentioned did not stop when Bush left office.Don't try to tell me conservatives are fiscally responsible

  • @urparanoia Ahahaha, trickle down? My statement had nothing do with trickle down, but considering you're a lib I'll just take it for granted that you don't know anything about economics, especially considering an "unfunded tax break." How, exactly, do you fund a tax cut? And all Bush did was add to the biggest entitlement in decades namely OASDI, which you know as social security, and which included medicare and medicaid. And unfunded wars? Everything we do is unfunded considering we are in debt

  • @urparanoia So lets see what's next, I'm sure you'll want to talk about how Clinton was just wonderful as well with his surplus, but he had a Republican congress for most of his presidency, i.e. budget gridlock. There is no such thing as a fiscal conservative outside of Ron Paul, and just to set the record straight Clinton put us into the dot com bubble that Bush inherited which became the housing bubble we all know and love.

  • @StickyGreenTreez-On one hand you want a repub congress to take credit for a Clinton surplus but on the other hand you want him to take the blame for anything that went wrong Silly boy! Your claim of the dot com bubble becoming the housing bubble is a clear indication that you are just another finger pointer.As for the financial crisis you missed conservative Al Greenspan when he admitted the conservative ideology he had believed in for decades is flawed and caused the home mortgage crisis.

  • @urparanoia Way to put words in my mouth. What I said was the only reason Clinton didn't go on the spending spree that every pres does when their party controls the executive and legislative branches is because the Reps controlled the legislature. Simple as that. Second, Alan Greenspan may be be a conservative, but he is not fiscal conservative. Silly rabbit, tricks are for kids.

  • @StickyGreenTreez -You are forgetting that during the first two years of the Clinton administration the legislative branch WAS NOT controlled by repubs. Again you are trying to REWRITE HISTORY.You people are good for a laugh. You are quick to throw the very people you vote for under the buss when you can no longer defend their policie. At that point you claim the very people you said were conservatives are not.The problem you have with Greenspan is that he admitted what we already knew.

  • @urparanoia Oh wow, so what does that prove? The dem legislature somehow created the surplus that happened during his last two years? Ahahaha, you really are a moron. So how is it that stating an obvious fact is rewriting history? And, um, how do you know who I voted for? I already told you I'm libertarian, and what I do is vote for gridlock because that's the only way to keep both parties from running completely amok, i.e. what is happening now and happened during most of Bush's terms.

  • @StickyGreenTreez - Still you are attempting to rewrite history by denying the mistakes of conservatives and still you have not answered my question regarding the double standard during the Clinton years.For your own good you should develop a better understanding of conservatism, how and why the country moved to the right, party ideology etc. in order to have a more intelligent conversation.You're a good example of a individual who has made up his mind and doesn't want to be confused by facts

  • @urparanoia So I'm rewriting history when I tell you that after Clinton's first two years he didn't have a chance to explode the deficit because Republicans controlled the legislative branch? I'm not a conservative, so why don't you move along. You obviously don't understand what being a conservative means anyway or you wouldn't make these half assed attempts to use unnammed "facts."

  • @urparanoia See, what happened during Clinton's last six years was called gridlock, which is what I vote for.

  • @urparanoia Oh and who was it that kept Greenspan as Fed chief? Oh, right, Clinton. And who was it that kept interest rates way too low? Oh, right, Greenspan. Take a lesson, it looks like you need it.

  • @StickyGreenTreez -Greenspan was also with the Fed after the Clinton years but that is not the point. Do you have some sort of learning disability ? As for my comment of rewriting history it applies to you since you choose to ignore what really happened in our past. As they say "if the shoe fits" and with you it fits perfectly. Regarding the Pauls they are both running as repubs so what does that tell you my small minded friend ? It shows there is little difference between the two.

  • @urparanoia He was also there before Clinton, derrrrr. Wow, you have a point or do you just repeat the same thing over and over parrot head? You must be a Jimmy Buffett fan. Oh wow, they are running as Republicans, that tells me they are from what would be called the 'Old Right', maybe you could look up some actual info sometime rather than just spouting off nonesense. Ron Paul has said repeatedly that he is the most conservative member of congress, because he's ACTUALLY conservative.

  • @urparanoia Oh what else, off the top of my head: when you look at the last 60 years of Federal Gov't who was in control of the congress? Oh, that's right! The democrats, and when did this country start going into debt because of excessive spending outside of wartime? Oh that's right, it was right around 60 years ago. You are the party of tax and spend, the Republicans just jumped on the bandwagon, and considering the fact that I am libertarian you probably shouldn't say anything to me about it.

  • @StickyGreenTreez-Another conservative who is trying to rewrite history. You should pay less attention to what conservatives say and more attention to what they do. Their rhetoric doesn't match their actions. You conservatives are allways good for a laugh. Call yourself what you like but at the end of the day it makes no difference if you claim to be libertarian, republican or conservative. Look at Rand Paul and Ron Paul who claim to be libertarian but at the end of the day they are repubs.

  • @urparanoia Rewrite history? Thank you parrot boy, I seem to hear the same thing out of you in every comment. Try saying something that actually refutes what I say, if you can. So why don't you go look up who controlled the legislative branch for the majority of the last 60 years? Because you know I'm right. Both Ron and his son are Libertarians or they wouldn't be saying we need to get rid of the Fed, DoE, IRS, etc. Have fun being a 50 year old with no clue.

  • @urparanoia Oh, and since you like to spout things off without any sort of documentation, like most web warriors, here: google Statistical Abstract of the United States in case factcheck can't help you. Also, lets not forget what is surely going to happen to the debt and deficit once the healthcare legislation takes effect.

  • @urparanoia You should work for the DNC with your propaganda! I'm very amused by your comments, LOL !!

  • @KB3MMX -The small minded are easily amused. Your hyperbole may impress the small minded but anyone with even a remote idea of what is going on politically can see that you have no understanding of what is going on around you. Calling libs nazi, commie etc only shows your ignorance. Do yourself a favor and read a book rather then display your ignorance on a public forum.

  • @urparanoia Another amusing post from a clueless Big Government Radical..simply amazing how blind you are to being brainwashed by the far left, big government propaganda. I put you COMMUNISTS, SOCIALISTS, MARXISTS, NEO-LIBS, STALINISTS, ETC in the same group as Being ANTI-LIBERTY, ANTI-FREEDOM, ANTI-HUMANITY. Your Big Government Utopian force fed ideals have led mankind into wars costing hundreds of millions of lives over history and you still don't get it. Clueless.

  • @KB3MMX Good, I'm glad to see I am not the ONLY one who cannot get a Liberal to either understand common sense while they clinging to "big government" fundamentals failing to understand it was never the intent for our frames to have a monarch as we have this administration believe themselves to be.

  • @madamalpha -Since you are doing anything to wiggle your way out of answering my question since I'm sure you don't like the answer I will do what you could have done in less time then it took to write your many comments. Conservative claim to be against entitlement programs yet they passed the biggest entitlement in decades with Medicare Prescript Part D.The program was unfunded as was the Iraq and Afganistan wars and contributed greatly to our debt.The question is do you know why they did this?

  • @urparanoia All while the DNC passed the HEALTHCARE ENTITLEMENT...did you forgt that one? It also looks like youconveniently FORGET that the DNC signed off on the WAR IN IRAQ and AFGHANISTAN!! More HYPOCRICY from the LOONY LEFT !!

  • @KB3MMX -First you should find out what DNC stands for and then use DNC correctly .Of course the Dems passed the healthcare but it is not dems who complain about entitlements. As I said and you conveniently forget the reason for going to war was based on lies. You may also recall that with the exception of Knight Ridder the media jumped onto the conservative band wagon of lies and dissenters were portrayed as unpatriotic which actually is the very tactics used by the third riech.

  • @urparanoia Good point, that's exactly why your LEFTIST DNC media continues to SMEAR anyone resisting the Left wing Radicals hostile takeover of this country!!  You sir can't see the forest through the trees!

  • @urparanoia Dems also complain about entitlements, they just complain about there being too little.

  • @madamalpha Yeah , Hate filled NEO-LIBS like Mr. Paranioa can't differentiate between fantasy land and reality, it's quite sad. If they trully believed in this country, they would support a CONSTITUTIONALLY limited government.

  • @KB3MMX-The difference between dem entitlements and the conservative entitlements was Medicare Prescrip part D was designed to ensure drug company profits after a program was proposed to negotiate drug prices as a group in order to purchase meds at a lower prices.When the right to do so was challenged in court and upheld conservatives rushed in with legislation making it illegal to do so and left taxpayers with the bill.How about countering with adult like comments containing a little substance?