Added: 4 years ago
From: jaspaulb
Views: 67,918
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (159)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • *points to center circle*

    

  • THAT GOAL COSTED US A CUP! when you look at it from the overview it dosent matter if its in the air or not, you can see white in between the line and the puck. I dont know who you cheer for but in Calgary we take our hockey very seriously, and a stanly cup title is extremly important to us, and for it to be taken away by a complete Bull Shit call, Thats going to get us mad!

  • @TheBlaxp you can say that but the bruins are no the real cup champions and it wasn't a goal

  • Guys it's clearly not a goal. The puck was not touching the ice, it was knocked a few inches above. Your eyes are tricking you. The puck hit the middle of Nick's pad, there is no way it was in. There is way more proof that it never crossed the line than that it did. ABC even had a little graphic that showed the reffs on the ice made the right call. get over it.

  • @Reconstudios1 Couldn't have said it better myself. Seriously, people can be so stubborn.

  • That's a fuckin goal. The real 2003-2004 Stanley Cup Champions are the CALGARY FLAMES!!

  • It was IN, crossed the LINE...NO kicking motion! the FLAMES were ROBBED!

  • for all u people who dont believe let me tell u something people saying it wasnt across the line it was in they air check the exact moment it hits his pads at that time its on the ice and in the net

  • they made the right call, it never crossed the line

  • @MrDaemonB if you stop sniffing coke you'll see that it was in

  • its in no matter what

  • Not in.

  • In or not, a lot closer than the Canucks have ever come.

  • Didnt go in? You can see white past the puck!

  • @DanAraya distinct kicking motion

  • if the goal counted then the lighting still could of scored after that and the same thing could of happend u never know but the lightning suck so that probably woudnt happen

  • how do you feel putting Notorious, Tiger, Phelps, Usain Bolt, Michael Jordan, Ovechkin, and countless other names, just for a six second clip. Get a life.

  • it went in but it wouldnt have helped the flames win the cup

  • They still blew another chance to win it in Game 7.

  • Not in at all.

  • That wasn't in.

  • @swizzlestiks look at more videos and u will clearly see it went in

  • nope bad angle looks like it went in overhead angle tells right

  • the play was reviewed and the call was the right call how come thats the only angle you have when there are like 3 or 4 next to the goal you got the over head shot, that BAD angle, and the net cam why that angle oh i know because thats the only one that looks like it went in.

  • this series was really one of the best the NHL has had. the Detroit, Pittsburgh IMO wasn't as exciting

  • The only reliable perspective here would be the top-down view, and in that view you can't at any point see the puck go over the line.

    Of course the puck will "look like" it's over the line when the camera is in front of the net-- it's a completely different perspective.

  • if it went in, then why doesnt the video show the puck crossing the line in sight and not in your flame dream

  • it does show the puck crossing the line...

  • his pad stop the puck and a snow flying. And the lightning winning the stanley cup

  • Comment removed

  • The puck went in but then the goalie kick it out.

  • type in Phantom Gelinas Goal went in

  • it went in

  • Because CAPITALS AND MULTIPLE EXCLAMATION MARKS ARE BETTER THAN FACTS. Your shitty hockey team sucks hairy balls, get over it.

  • me get over it ooo calgary shoud have won oooo thats wat all calgary fans sound like and u tell me to get over it wow

  • Just for the record: I am not a Flames fan. I'm just a guy with a certain dislike of all these redneck hockey dyslexics out here trying to justify their win.

  • tampa bay sux gayest team in the league

    THEY SUCK MORE THEN THE CANUCKS!!!!!

  • Got o my channel for a still close up of the puck past the line.

  • im just saying we dont really no if it was completely in remember cause when its blown up it doesnt look as what it actually did

  • Or if the war room in Toronto had that camera angle which shows that it went in. Why they didn't beats the heck out of me.

  • 0:03 it's in!

  • That went in, and to this day is the largest controversy for flames fans, ever.

  • I hate the lightning. The Flames should have been the 2004 champs.

  • flames ain't ridiculous!!!

  • Would Tampa have been able to overcome a non-call in game 6?

  • Thing about this is, this should have gone to video review. It's too big a potential goal not to go to video review. And yeah, if this goal had counted, I think the Flames would have won Stanley that night. Don't think Tampa would have come back, in Calgary's barn, with them 7 minutes from the Cup.

  • Even if Buffalo would have won Game 6, i don't think they would have won a Game 7 at Reunion Arena.

    Edmonton 06 and Calgary 04, on the other hand? There, you can make a case.

  • saiyajingabe obviously ur not a fuckign flames fan or u wouldnt be calling it ridiculous. but it was in, have to be mental to not see it

  • im not a flames fan, that goal was in, i seen the black mark (that was clearly the puck) go across the line

  • I watched that Sh*t!, This is Bullshit!, They Never counted it. and Me and my Friends were Mad

  • Next Year, fellow flames, next year.

    This goals about as controversial as Hulls goal on Hasek, the only difference is this one WAS IN.

  • The colour is all retarded but if you actually watch a good clean version of this you can clearly see its in, Calgary Flames, the true 2004 Stanley Cup Champs!!!

  • buddy i am a life long sabres fan please dont bitch, all i gotta say is 1999 biggest fuck up in the history of the NHL

  • your precious luongo is the most over rated goalie in the n.h.l... what has he done. got hurt and one two playoff series.

  • Do they fuck every hardworking team out of a stanley cup?

  • yah fuck u twinssuck

  • it was in no doubt about it kari frasers an asshole

  • fuck the canucks

  • fuck you

  • that was in!

  • Luongo can't win behind a lousy defense of Vancouver, he's good but he can't stop them all.

  • HAHHAHAHAHAHHAHAH...so...umm, i guess you havent heard of that team from detroit huh? those shitty hockey players who have won 4 titles in 11 years? that horrible team that has been a powerhouse for the last 15 years....the crappy organization that has persevered through several game 7's and has more experience and talent than anyone can put on the ice? yea...yer canucks ARE GONNA WHOOP THEM! AHHAH. canucks shouldnt even be int he playoffs LOL.

  • YAAA!

  • Flames are gonna choke. GO BLACKHAWKS.

    Khabibulin is gonna shut you out again, talk about a burn.

  • You can't call a choke when the team is playing bad already and could be missing two of their top D.

  • Hell yeah!

  • dude, when i saw that game, i was so screwed and pissed to here the "no goal"

  • i hate calgry but i think they should have won the cup. and that was a goal

  • yea me i dont hate the flames but im a flyers fan and the lightning knocked the flyers out that year so i cheered for the flames and i was like what the fuck that was a goal. It was such a goal

  • @sportyedge101 that was pretty humble of you, i don't see many other Americans like you, nice job

  • GO FLAMES GOOO!! their gonna take the cup this year! even tho we should of won it in 04

  • Right on to that Thats okay we have another cup Go Flames Go

  • In our hearts we did win win The Cup And as for Gelinas ,he is an AWSOME!! player.I just wish in some ways Sutter would have resigned him foe another year ''Tons Of Heart''As for Bertuzzi Iginla and Cammy (class act)

  • I say Flames all the way, but Bertuzzi... Not a good signing. Contract is only for 1 year though... Mike Camalleri is much, MUCH better than Big Bert.

  • nah i think bert will add a bit..wut am i saying...i think bert will add a lot more physical play into Calgary, if Calgary can play defense just hit em

  • im still pissed it was in i swear to god i have never been so mad in my life but we got burtuzzi now too so here it comes 09 get ready to be enilated by the falmes W00t

  • we should of won the cup

  • retarded refs, my birthday also. i was mad that they didnt win.

  • That was in.

  • oh yeah, i remember that!

  • Die Hard Flames Fan, I know that that puck went in but this video wasn't very clear. Do you guys have a picture or a video with a better image? THanks, I think Bettman probably deleted all the good ones to save himself the embarassement.

  • check out one of my videos regarding this it clearly shows the puck in look at my videos and u will be it

  • flamess rules

  • thats puck was in flames should of won the cup in 04 flames rule

  • crappy refs screwed up again and in this series cgy prbly would have one if the reffs wernt so one sided

    go flames go

  • i was at this game....and it didn't get reviewed at the game no one saw anything they didnt even show a replay..jus looked like a save...not until i got home did i see the puck in the net...coulda watched my team lift the cup....AHHHHHHH FUCK THE REFS....and once again the refs fucked us in san jose....peices of shit...

  • i am a die hrd flames fan i i saw u say if u see a clear enough video its clearly in can u plz show me a video i have been looking and cant find out

    o and a picture will do to thx mike

  • i thibk mick mguoh was the ref

  • He's not a very good ref either.

  • 2004 playoffs i didn't pay attention to although I wish I could have. that was one of the best times of my life I just graduated from HS and was never home I didn't even watch my own team even though they lost in the first round. i was going for the lightning because they were east but i also wanted tflames to win because they would have maybe appreciated it more...who knows...GO DEVILS!

  • im going to florida to watch the caps and lightning and im cheering for the caps cause i hate the lightning hahaha

  • Ha! I wonder what the goal officials in Toronto are thinking if they saw this clip! That really sucks! I love the Flames!

    GO FLAMES!

  • LIGHTNINGS SUCKS GO FLAMES GO

  • holy shit

    all i know in the paper the next day they showed the puck clearly across the line, and that the lightning fuckin suck this year

    holy shit

  • Stanley cup winners 2004 - Calgary Flames

  • the puck a not enter in the net because is the full puck in the net=goal

  • the puck was fully in it was a goal stevie wonder could tell it was ,game over cup to calgary

  • The problem was they didn't review it. The guys could have, but didn't, which turned out to be a mistake. Sportsnet, and sportscenter all reviewed it on their shows afterwards as I recall, and both believed the goal should have been counted.

  • fukin rights wata game for calgary that was hahah 9-6 2 hat-tricks amazing

  • You know if it was goal it was goal, it was not a goal and there is no way to tell with out the third dimension. If you had watched the game that night they reviewed it with the media from every angle possible and there is NO CONCLUSIVE EVIDENCE THAT IT WAS A GOAL. So get over it, Tampa won the cup. You had a good team but not good enough.

  • your completely retarded, they didnt review it at all, make sure you know what your talking about before you say anything, try looking at a more clearer and in depth video...

  • Dumber Bay Sucks!!! Go Flames Go!!!

  • UP yours little man. At least you go into hockey though. Which is a good thing.

  • u cant make that case if ur team is last in your division man Calgarys a good team as is TB , TBs just strugling, and its not a big deal it happend in the past so yeah.

  • Fuck the refs!Tampa is just a piece of shit.I have never seen a team like the 2004 flames,they were just simply amazing.I can't wait to see Iggy lift the cup. Flames 4 ever

  • Flat out. Tampa should not have won the Stanley Cup. Niether should have Carolina, Anahiem, or Dallas while deep rooted cites like Vancouver, Minnisota, St. Louis and Buffalo are still wait 35-40 + years for their 1st Stanley Cup. Vancouver did win a cup way back when they had the Millionares but that was like a million years ago.

  • gives me chills thinking about this...and how it said "ghost" of finals past didnt make it any better either...

  • The way I see it, is you have you freaking red mile in Calgary; thousands, literally thousands of fans screaming for hours. However, in Tampa Bay you have what; the gray foot? Just like two fans sitting there saying, "So what did Tampa win the NFL championship?" Morons.

  • well theres no use crying over spilt milk just remember tampa didn't win shit in a perfectly reffed game

  • CONSPIRACY! CONSPIRACY!

    -.-

  • i know i can't do anything about it. the cup is big and we have the right to be pissed if we think we got cheated.

  • oh yeah. THAT PUCK IS AS IN AS HOCKEY IN CANADA. GO FLAMES GO, GO LEAFS GO, GO CANADA GO

  • this is the truth flames 2 cups tampa 0!

  • well it did come down to this play cuz if this counted the flames would have won the cup immediately

  • Actually no, We would of went up 3-2 in the 3rd period. There is nothing saying that Tampa could of came and scored to tie it and win in OT again.

  • yup that wouldve been the game right there.. i couldnt see the flames losing it after that goal .. too bad (N)(N)

  • i agree with it was 3 years ago but lke wtf, what was that ref doing...and if u were a flames fan it was hard.. it pissed you right off. but looks like u didnt care did u?? so before u go around making dumbass comment think aobut what ur gonna say. try to have some positive things.

  • it did cross the line u fuck job... the ref was crazy not to say it didnt

  • no it didnt. that was the straight on angle. if u look at it from the side. it is halfway in, then kicked out, u fucking retard. god flamer fans r so fucking stupid

  • your so fucking stupid you tard. if you can see the white ice in front of it, its in, no matter what the hell angle you look at it.

  • They have every right to bitch. They should have won the cup. Instead of going to a place where hockey is a religion, the cup went to a city who doesn't know shit about hockey.

  • Where were the refs doing on that goal? Playing with their jock straps while they had them on, there's somthing Tampa can be proud of.

  • As for you saying Tampa doesn't know shit about hockey. Do you realize that just about half this town is Canadian? What does that tell you.

  • Are you seriously questioning the difference between hockey fans in Alberta and hockey fans in Florida?

    Wow.

  • half of tampa is not canadian. the entire lighting team is though. american cities buy canadian players. people in tampa have never even seen real ice and don't know shit about hockey.

  • There are many Canadians, northeasterners, and midwesterners in Tampa and surrounding areas who lived in hockey-rich environments.

    Even if that wasn't the case, it's absurd to say people don't know anything about hockey. People can learn the game. Every hockey fan who ever lived, including you, started out not knowing hockey. There's a first time for everything.

    And the passion of some Tampa hockey fans can match that of fans in any other city in the NHL.

  • dude, the goal whasnt even reviewed and no team in the nhl has cameras on top of the goal line so check your freaking fackts befor u say that stuff. P.S.- what kind of name is Deempie92?

  • By the way.. If Calgary would have put cameras on top of THEIR goal lines in THEIR rink.. It would have been more clear...

  • It happens, the Flames were robbed. Tampa took it, and they did need it, hopefully they got more fans. Tampa's an exciting team and it wasn't their fault. Nothing you can do after the fact, Tampa worked hard and won it.

  • THAT WAS IN U BASTERD FRIKEN TARD

  • Wow. Temper.

  • tampa needed it to stay in tampa...screw tampa... the team would be much more appreciated in a city say like.... WINNIPEG?

  • DAMN STRAIGHT! Are you from the Peg?

  • Yeah. The Jets were so appreciated that all the people of Winnipeg just couldn't muster up the funds to keep the team in town by building a new arena which would have brought the team into the 20th and 21st centuries.

  • I have a friend who was complaining about the "high stick" in the Montreal game against Toronto that cost them a playoff spot. I told him that they had 81 other games to prove that they could be in the playoffs. This is different, they DID win the cup, they did every thing they had to, to do it. The ref was just blind. And this is coming from a Sens fan.

  • they had 6 other games to prove they were better... haha jk jk, only joking.

  • his pad was a foot in the net, and the puck was on the line at that time. use your heads his pads cant touch up with the puck that fast.

  • im not even gonna lie though u cant tell on this vid

  • I seriously wish that somebody could find a version of this goal that actually proves something. KSharp and tampabay I respect both of you for keeping a calm and respectable way for arguing about this. I personally still don't think it went it but I don't think we'll ever know really.

  • 2003 04 stanley cup champion r the flames, but they just didnt count it.

  • ok...the WHOLE puck has 2 be over the line..and in game 7 ABC had a thing with computer graphics showing the whole puck did not go over the line...its the best thing we have cuz theres no camra directly above the line...i respect the flames and it was maybe 1 of the best stanley cup finals in history but lets go lightning!!

  • Dude, you're right that video is so blurred, blue and fast, you can't see shit on that. In an interview, Martin Gelinas himself said it was no goal, and Darryl Sutter said there was no way you could tell if that went in, which Colin Campbell and all the people that matter that looked at it said you cannot prove that puck went in the net.

  • are you stupid???i can see the puck inside the line and freakin khabibulin kicking his right pad inside the line!!

  • The Boston Red Sox in the 1986 World Series...

    The Chicago Cubs in the 2003 NLCS...

    The Calgary Flames in the 2004 Stanley Cup finals...

    what do all these teams have in common?

    they all could have won their respective series in game 6, but because they had a controversial call, their fans cried about it, and the teams all lost their game 7s.

    tampa bay > calgary

  • it was not a controversial call. it was actually proved over and over again after the game/season that the puck conclusively crossed the line and should have been a goal. yes, there was still time left in the game, but if you were watching you knew after 2-2 it was a next goal wins type of game. enjoy your cup, you did earn it, i will give you that, but so did we. the only difference is you got to lift it with your hands, not your eyes.

  • Not only was there still time in the 3rd period, but there was a whole OT, and that short half minute of double OT, then an entire 60 minutes of a whole new game. The point that I was trying to make was how that one play wasn't what made the series, and using that as an excuse for losing is just stupid to me.

    Though I do appreciate you for giving us respect, because I know it would be hard for me to be able to do that if the situation would be the other way around.

  • yes, there was still OT, but the point I'm trying to make is, if Gelinas' goal counted, and time expired without Tampa scoring, then yes, the goal would have made the series. That play was pivotal. There should at least be no quesion. The same could have gone Tampa's way and it would be the same situation with fans on your side.

    It was a great run though, and a great series.

  • SUCK MY BALLS. FLAMES ARE TEH PWNZERX

    skank

  • Should have won? There was still 7 minutes in the game after that. Who knows what could have happened.

    Maybe you should learn the rules to hockey first, though. There's got to be inconclusive evidence that the puck was COMPLETELY ALL THE WAY ACROSS, which it never was. Khabby got it as it was in the air, tilted, over the line as shown by the 3D reconstruction that ESPN did after the game using the different camera angles in the building and simple math.

  • ya i know there was 7 minutes left, but assuming no team scored, calgary would have one. but do you know where you can watch other replays and footage of this "goal"?

  • hey does anybody know where i can get any other footage of this "goal". i as a flames fan am more than 100% sure it was a goal, i just wanna see the replay again, i havent seen it in soo long. thanks! :)

  • HAHAHAHAA thats right!!! the flames won! just the reffs were to stupid to review the freakin play!

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more