What tHe BLeeP Do wE (k)now? Part 5 "Random Generators"

[mcazul07]

I did the same experiment. Regardless of the intentions in the room random number generators worked just the way they need to work: Random.

There was religion still there is and now we have new age crap wonderfull.

[chrispyery]

What's this movie called??

[pinonoir302]

Is anyone know where they make that movie ?

[NAKOR007]

@pinonoir302 - What the Bleep Do We Know!? (1hr 40m)

- What the Bleep-Down the Rabbit Hole (2hrs 30m)

- What the Bleep-Quantum Edition (5 hrs)

[SidneyXda]

holy shit..that took me by surprise..i never knew that woman had had disability .

[chrispyery]

@SidneyXda She's on the celebrity apprentice (she's deaf)

[BunionMann]

Acting is painful. Science is painful. Movie is painful.

[guitardaddy6]

this happened to me. my tai chi teacher explained it to me. one time i was there for a class. it was in his back yard and we exerted our chi up and thought about the rain stopping. it was only a light drizzle. but sure enough it stopped within a minute. it was an hour class and every time i focused on something else it started to drizzle lightly. and when i focused it stopped. after an hour i left and was driving home. only then did it start raining golf ball size rain drops. i live in texas.lol

[kilianguntner]

:) some really interesting ideas

[Nisahaid]

@kilianguntner not really

[kilianguntner]

... out of a poetic perspective ;)

[b4ugo2town]

if collective consciousness can shape physical realities then I would have to surmise that in the days of old in which they believed the world to be falt...the world would have been such as the collective consciousness suggested it to be...the reality however is the world was round...is round and will stay this way.

[thegagan]

your argument is moot... argumentative fallacy: missing the point.

[papaping1234]

i had to look up the word moot

but neways his idea is a common idea but interesting enough not to be moot

[aqwiz]

people weren't trying to make the world flat, and the results are micro-pk, it would probably take on the order of ten billion people all meditating on a single glass of water (or whatever object) to actually move it, if they simply are of the opinion that the water is already moved and don't focus on it it would probably be more like on the order of hundreds of trillions, there were only a five million humans on the face of the earth in 5000 bc., about 14 million in 3000 bc

[aqwiz]

not to mention that not everyone in "the old days" believed the earth was flat, just anglo saxons really, the mongols, africans, and native american people, pretty much had other notions about the workings of our planet. and papaping if you had to look up the definition of the word moot, . . . noone cares what you have to say on such a topic, sorry but I think I speak for all of the youtubers out there on this one.

[aiklarung]

The worst is that he already passed the US education system, and is on a university. Being from Brazil and one year younger than him, I must agree with many that say that the US education system is being corrupted by politicians to under-thrid-world levels of quality.

Not trying to just troll around, I believe there is not direct relationship in the number of people involved versus the amount of matter to be altered. but both are unfundamented claims, mine and yours. WE NEED MORE SCIENCE! Ó_Ò

[aqwiz]

Actually the fact that at new year's eve the atomic clock used to mark the time of the ball drop changes ever so slightly, is a direct foundation for my claim. I think it depends on the experience of the person doing the concentrating personally, but I believe that if millions of people looking at one thing and changing the outcome, nearly imperceptibly, that would mean that no matter how well trained someone is a whole population can barely move a digital object, much less a physical one.

[aiklarung]

But, supposedly, (i.e. I've not seen it by myself) some people could bend lasers. I only remember reading about Barbara Brennan doing that, atm. But, I don't believe "telekinesis" should be measured in kilograms-force or something newtonian like that. Take a look at the other videos on quantum mechanics for instance =P

[TaNgLeD2121]

@aiklarung .... i just had too say this is a great comment!

[Runepriest442]

Was the world round? b4ugo2town? I mean if you go back and observe the world, THEIR collective REALITY was that the world was flat. Then that consciousness changed. The world wasn't always round. At one point it was flat. HELL at one point it was a Gas cloud. Just because our reality is NOW observable round world. Doesn't mean that it was or will always be that way.

[aiklarung]

very good point Runepriest!

[32GaugeSlug]

This film had a really good message, but was completely undermined by a moronic Americanised storyline with CARTOONS!!! to boot.