Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (58)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • kire tui ki Bangladesh e asos?I guess not.Takle amar hate mair kaiti.

  • watch?v=a3h3dkyJ2a8

  • @Re4perZer0 India, itself is a fabricated word. It acutally stands today for 22 different languages, Three ethnic groups and 3-4 beliefs. There is no one characteristic that is shared among all the Indian except maybe a merger in our history for the last 500 years since Akbhar united the sub continent. Look at the people that inhabit the sub continent more closely u will see the diversity.

    "India is a geographical term, it is no more a united nation than the equator " Winston Churchill.

  • 4) Time spent on the study of religious scriptures lead us nowhere. Every civilization since the beginning of time have had their own Gods - The Sumerians, Akkadians, Assyrians, Persians. Islamic nations today have invested too much on building their societies around Islam. Few muslim nations have reached true secularism. In my view religion should be merely spiritual, without making any lifestyle demands.

  • @workhardt2 greater india? it included afghanistan and iran, are you going to call THOSE indian too? greater bengal itself included burma, tibet, and bangladeshis have had a long history with ayutthaya, bagan,arakan especially, indonesia( sumatra, java, bali) as well as various arab nations and you still haven't responded to my previous arguments, you just keep restating your thesis.

  • @Re4perZer0 Actually India's influence end in Pakistan Punjab and Sindh. India has had little influence over the Pashtuns and the Balochs and its influence on Iranians and Afghans are minimal.

  • @workhardt2 exactly, so just because they were once part of the empire, doesn't mean they're indian.

  • @Re4perZer0 The last 500 years of the people that today call themselves "Indians" is the only link between its people.

  • @Re4perZer0 ok but bangladesh itself has again had different unindian occupations. india is ethnically diverse, true, but certain ethnicities are more native like those in delhi and tamil nadu. pakistanis aren't completely indian, bangladeshis aren't completely indian.

  • @Re4perZer0 ... Actually the Tamils are dravidians not Indo-Aryans. The language hasn't evolved from the sanskrit. Their culture is alot different. The Northern India, share alot in common with the Pakistanis, more so the Punajbi Indians and the Punjabi Pakistanis (If u put aside religion).

    Your statement that the Bangladeshis aren't indian, has little substance. India,Bangladesh ( are terms that are just 60 and 40 years old) the histories of these people go back about 2500 years.

  • @workhardt2 you were talking about INDIANS. perhaps i worded it wrong. tamil nadus history is INSEPARABLE from india, it has no geographical adjacencies with other countries or heteroethnic regions, Northern south asia has middle eastern influence, you're right. so then the term "indian" itself is just a name is it not? the ethnically different bhutanese, tibetans, and nepalese are considered "indian" as well, just as black negritos are considered malaysian. doesn't mean it's same ethnicity.

  • One can be both patriot Bengali and a muslim. So, if you think you cant be a patriot Bangladeshi and a devout muslim, than please find some other country to preach your hatred. One more thing, stop showing off your family history.

  • if ur ancestors had any role in da creation of pak den why pakis are not giving you any credit for dat? why no history books of pak mentions da role of razakars of east pak? da young generation of pak doesnt even know what razakar is? pakis r giving all da credit to jinnah and punjabis for da creation of pak. correct me if i am wrong.

  • Comment removed

  • I dont know if i am interpreting you correctly but it seems you have great pain for your people and the Muslims of the region. Do not despair my brother.. Do your best in terms of Dawah and social work and spreading awareness about the khilafat among your people. Inshallah Muslims of the world will prevail in the end...

  • I would never approve of Bangladesh becoming united with India. I'm bengali and proud, and India has oppressed Bangladesh (setting fire to factories, raping women in jessore, dumping trash in Bangladesh, etc). Bangladesh is ethnically and culturally different from India, we are unique. my father was the son of Abul Mohammed Muhebur Khair Rahman, he went through that war too, and was a school friend of Sheikh mujebur Rahman, he videotaped the speeches, and helped start the revolution, etc.

  • @Re4perZer0 They would also go to each other's houses, I was raised really nationalist, I'm just trying to establish the fact that I DO understand what I'm saying and what I'm talking about when I make that statement up there.

  • @Re4perZer0 ... Actually Bangladesh was always a part of India. Bengalis have close to 2500 years of Hindus, buddhism ancestry. Bangladesh, which flourished under the Pala and later the Sena Dynasty (700 AD- 1300 AD) was largely a Buddhist, Hindu nation, until Islam arrived in 1300 AD. Bengali has evolved from Sanskrit, the Bengalis are anthropologically Indo- aryans the same group of people that inhabited Northern India.

  • @Re4perZer0 ... You say ur a patriot yet u are blind to see the cultural, linguistic , ethnic and possibly a shared religion (India has 180 million muslims- west Bengal has 25 % muslims ). Where do u think Bengalis culture has evolved from ? Is Bangladeshi culture akin to Japanese or German or closer to Bengalis and Indians ?

  • @workhardt2 the aryans came for a few hundred years after the indigenous and primal tibeto-burmans, most of whom now are buddhist like intial Bangladesh (then considered part of the Tibetan empires and Arakan). Hinduism doesn't say much, since there's hindus in Thailand, Indonesia, and malaysia. Which, by the way are Bangladesh's highest affiliated countries, throughout history (trade, immigration, integration, etc, especially during the vanga kingdoms period).

  • @Re4perZer0 what do u mean that Hinduism doesn't say much ?

    Okay, let look at it this way culturally and linguistally bengalis share much in common with first the west Bengalis and then to a certain extent with the indians. Secondly Bangladesh is a small nation with a high population density, that is surrounded on three sides by india. Its water flow into the nation from India and finally Bangladesh is a low lying area with is alittle above sea level.

  • @workhardt2 Hinduism (smalll population it is) is prominent in Laos, Cambodia (as brahmanism, same thing anyway), thailand, and Indonesia. culturally and linguistically? growing up bengali I find more in common with the burmese, thai, and indonesians, indians are more outgoing, louder, and assertive. and the Yangtze River flows throughout China as well. if you study the northeast india, you would know that those people are ehtnically tibetoburmans like bengalis by roots are as well as burmese

  • @Re4perZer0 .. You and I both know very well that Bangladesh, is acutally a part of India. Bengalis are mostly Indo-aryan and then maybe Mongol-dravidian, Tibetan-burmese. Bengali is today spoken by 90 million Indians that share a similar culture to the Bangladeshis. There is nothing unike in Bangladesh, it is clearly, India's bemused child.

  • @Re4perZer0 Merging with India, will give Bengalis more power should they be made a part of India's parliamentary system. This video clearly states that the partition of India was a mistake initiated by Jinnah who inherits much of the blame. The partition of India has actually gone on to reduce the Muslim strength in the sub-continent dividing them between three nations. India and Bangladesh need better relations, i believe India has recognized this, will the Bangladeshis ?

  • @workhardt2 reduce Muslim strength? Hindus have gone on to riot against Muslims and constantly oppress them and treat them like an enemy gang, even in India. bengalis NEEDED this separation to be away from all the Hindu and Indian pressure. Now as an independent country, Bangladesh has improving and individual relations with China and Thailand, resources of its main imports along with increasingly strong business relations with Japan, the 3rd highest capitalist empire in the world.

  • @Re4perZer0 I was talking about the sub continent muslims. The partition of India, was that of Jinnah and Muhammed Iqbal's brainchild, but it eventually turned out to hurt the sub continent muslims dividing their allegiance, and reducing their cumulative strength.

  • @Re4perZer0 ..The Hinduism is actually simply a spiritual religion, it make few demands on its followers. It is an Indo-aryan religion, unlike Islam and Christianity which are semitic religions and subvert all its followers to bow to the arabs- it is after all the reason the binding force that intrinsically united the arabs and strengthened them. Islam has essentially wiped out the histories of the regions that it has seized and the locals have forgotten their Hindu, Buddhist past.

  • @workhardt2 Aryans came later, but at roots we are smaller, darker, and southeastern people. Islam is a huger part of modern Bangladeshi culture than Hinduism by far (not enough space to put examples), and Bangladesh as I said before, has been through many conquests, INCLUDING ARYAN. aryans invaded Bangladesh and introduced Hinduism to replace the tribal and Buddhist religions. and one country does not recognize another country's muslims as its community, politics and economy are concrete.

  • @Re4perZer0 As a rule of thumb the language family of a group of speaker illustrates the dominate racial composition of that group of speakers . Bengali- belongs the Indo-Aryan language family, most likely Bangladeshi are Indo-Aryans with secondary Mongol-Dravidians, Tibetan-Burmese herediatary. You clearly admit to Bangladeshis being dark, that is because u'll also have a Dravidian(South Indian) hereditary.

  • @Re4perZer0 Hinduism is older than Buddhism. Buddhism grew out of Hinduism, they are similar religions, known as Dharmic religions. Siddhartha Gautama was himself a Hindu, it is true that Bangladesh flourished under Buddhist rulers during the Pala dynasty, and was the predominate reason for the spread of Mahayana Buddhism but then by the 10th-13th century. The Sena, Deva Dynasty was when Hinduism flourished in Bengal again. India, Bangladesh's differing beliefs only began with the Mughal rule.

  • @Re4perZer0 Bangladesh has to realize it Hindu, Buddhist Past as Bengalis have been Hindu, Buddhist for long times than they have been muslims. Acknowledging this will allow the Bangladeshis to see their past more clearly as studying one's history is akin to knowing their identity. I am certain that the Bangladeshis belong to a greater india (See greater india - wikipedia), this partition on the lines of religion has actually aggravated religious sentiments.

  • @workhardt2, Islam though does create alot of problems.

    1) Islam is not merely spiritual, but make demands on its followers.

    2) Islam, does not allow idol worship, with this the converts - Bangladeshies refuse to look at their Hindu, Buddhist past.

    3) Islamic nations see Saudi Arabia as the holy land, and Arabic as the holy Language, instead of their own country and their own language. Today Pakistani Punjabis are refusing their Punjabi culture and language for Urdu.

  • Comment removed

  • The Bengaladeshis failure to realize that they were indeed Hindus, Buddhist and predominatly indo-aryan with a culture and language that resembles India, is bad for India, but worse for Bangladesh. As it is, akin to loosing its history and its identity. Bangladesh is indeed Indian, its realization of this fact will allow it to flourish.

  • @workhardt2 one more thing, Islam isn't about one subcontinent uniting, it's about all of mankind uniting for the greater good.

  • @workhardt2 Not to mention, India has only given Bangladesh things like the Farakka Barrage, rape of women on the border, and bribing textile workers to set their factories on fire. India is in charge of ALL of these atrocities, and is known to be a disunited nation anyways, so the relationship would be more trouble than its worth. There's a reason the Northeast area of India wants to secede, and it's only PARTLY because India lacks the sufficient resources to even provide for its own people

  • @workhardt2 sanskrit? do you know how many evolved from sanskrit? Khmer language, Nepalese, Bhutanese, and Laotian evolved from Sanskrit. Even Chinese evolved from Sanskrit as well as Farsi. So is this unique to Bengali? No. If you knew anything about the area you'd know about the various conquests of Bengal (which has no homogenous genetics) by the Mughal Empire, Arakanese empire, Tibetan empire, Pashtun empire, even Abbasid, even speculations of Siamese conquest.

  • bangladesh and india should stick together ,,, fuck pakistan.

  • you know bengalis brothers it was the idiot hindus who protesed in 1906 to cancel the divison of bengal into east and west bengal. and they succeeded in doing so.

    these hindus hate you bengalis. don't take them as your friends. they are back biters. they stripped muslims of bengal from kolkata, which was of course an muslims populated city.

    Islam zindabad

    pakistan and bangladesh zindabad

  • i love pakistan and i can give my life for it,,,,,,,,,,,,and inshaallah india will be ours oneday,the flag of islam will on the laal qila delhi

  • shut the fuq up u inbreeder. u read like a 9year old. u fuqin taleban freak

  • constipation..bujhle bhai...onekdin porishkar na hoile emon hoy.

  • this person is so hilarious and boring as well. how dare he is calling himself a razakar this day. he must be very lucky. but he is not dare enough to admit it in BD. he must be in a foreign country. he is fuckin good Muslim but not a patriot. ass-hole.

  • these are the words of a kaffir...

    bastard

  • bazigaar420,why are you so hatefull towards him?Why are you muslims always so hatefull?

  • @He805 oh the muslims are hateful????????? and the whole world which is against muslims community because the muslims are correct & all are jealous,we are not hateful we are religious,peaceful & if u read the muslims history u will see that all kings of muslims after fatah never kill anyone

  • @SYED579 If Islam is a religion of peace,then why all this selfbombing?I could send you milions of tapes here from YouTube showing people who had got their hands and feets cutted off in the name of Allah,people getting killed because they are none muslims et cetera.

  • @He805 listen man. muslims are a tolerant nation as a whole. it is the reaction of what is imposed on them. the idiot kafirs have surrounded them and they are defending themselves . ignorant ('-|-')

  • Brother, Pakistan and Bangladesh will be one again inshaAllah once we follow the footsteps of the Prophet! We will be one Ummah!

  • ahmedshah1990 What a load of bullshit you speak. Why should a nation which has democratic values and a passion for their language join a bunch of of junta run idiots thousands of miles away? Has Pakistan even apologised for the war crimes it committed all these decades ago? No! So don't shove down that "ummah" shit down anyone. Oh and by the way, what will happen to the 10 million hindus who call Bangladesh home? Most Bangladeshis muslim consider a hindu Bangladeshi a "brother" over a Pakistani

  • Lyceefruit, do not worry much and ignore Ahmedshah, like him ignorant made the stupid Pakistan in 1947. Muslim League was out of reality. You are right . Bangali should have their own culture and Language. Some Mosquito brain don't get it.

  • @tmirdotorg for your kind information many bengalis live in pakistan. and they are happy.

    i agree that it was a difficult relationship. no 2 countries can live together million of miles away.

    be a bengali live bengali. but i have heard som kind of things like you prostrate before each other is not hindu way.

    stan up bengalis and become a muslim country free of indian culture.

    we still love you from paksitan

  • Comment removed

  • this person is undoubtedly an agent of RAW! Just ignore them!

  • This Fucker need 2 no more info on 71 war..wat pakistan did 2 the banagla people.. Rape women...killer people..

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more