His goal, along with the leftist and progressives was to bring Socialism to America. He is a servant of Big busines who also want Socialism as dreamed by Karl Marx. They will be the masters of this New World order, Obama is only a tool and takes his orders from the Council of Foreign Relations (CFR). Do some research on the conspiracy.
The EU won the US election this time around. We will now have 3% of our paychecks left over after taxation, thanks to this global presidential campaign. I want to know what YOUR president intends to do for those who lose their homes. I want to know just how limited the constitution will be under YOUR president. Our politics were none of your business, yet Europe rules us again. Maybe we need another revolution.
Forget the president, and don't quote 3% of your paycheck, because thats bullshit. Europe does not rule the USA, it does not vote in the elections. Barack Obama seems to be someone who is actually smart, and realises that a better nation is one that looks after it's citizens.
As for socialism, what the hell is so bad about it? Every developed nation leans centreleft/centre right, USA is almost always on the right, depending on degree.
We are happy that he won because now, finally, the USA will stop invading people!
And how is he looking after us first? No, from what i know, he's investing in public health and education, so that everyone will benefit. Thats not a bad thing, your actually being progressive and joining the rest of the world.
This president has actually looked at an atlas and realised that the "world" isn't just Alaska and Hawaii.
We had every right to our war in Afghanistan. Islam has become a problem.
"public health and education"
No he hasnt, in fact his investments are to go to inner city districts only. His own party in congress and the senate are threatening to stall his financial requests until they are assured that it wont be shared with rural America.
Oh yuk, Lenin, Mao and Stalin were not Presidents of the United States were they? Mao and Lenin were revolutionaries, Stalin was a war leader. Hmm, George Bush the war leader?
It would be a pretty hard thing to get through congress "oh lets just ive 3/4 of the population receive benefits, but don't worry about the rest of them" yeh, good work right there.
"Lenin, Mao and Stalin were not Presidents of the United States were they?"
Given the election outcome concerning congress, the senate, and the presidency it is fair to say that the progressive ideals of Lenin, Stalin, and Mao have now become our ruling identity.
We might keep parts of one or two articles of our constitution but the rest is as good as gone. Our progressives have rallied against that document since the 1960s. Now they get to burn it.
No, your government is a popularity contest; the one with the most money, wins. And it is a 2 party system, vote left or vote right, thats your choice of president, if you vote at all.
If you said to someone from Russia or China that the USA has their identity, you would be chased out of town, with vodka bottles being thrown at you.
No, America is a low taxing, low spending country, with a lot of negative freedoms which the rest of the western world got rid of
Negative? There was nothing negative about our freedoms.
Free speech for the people. The right of the people to bear arms so we may defend the rest of our rights from our own electied officials. The right to a trial by jury. The right to a speedy trial. The right to demand a reasoned search warrent from law enforcement. Such things arent negative.Only a truly free people embrace them, we were once a free people.Now the majority wants none of those rights.
i get what your saying, it's great in theory (like soviet communism) but it doesn't work in practise. How is being able to own a gun and blasting some guys head off without charge a good thing?
We ditched those laws for a good reason, they bad rights! In fact, it actually says the right to bear arms, not guns..what about swords? Can you walk around USA with a giant claymore and chain mail for self defence?
If done to defend onself or home it is a good thing.I dont see how some violent sociopath has the right to break into my home in the middle of the night armed with just about anything while knowing I will have nothing to defend myself with.
"right to bear arms,not guns"
WRONG!The founders did mean guns. They didnt limit early Americans to running around in chain mail armed with kitchen knives.Such weapons and defense systems are outdated in a modern world.
It works fine,I live in a right to carry state with a castle doctrine.Violent crimes arent as common here as states that criminalize all forms of self defense.
"they bad rights"
It has to do with the right to life,liberty,and the persuit of happiness.You ditched all 3! Your criminals can have belt fed weapons, but you might be able to get a .22 but only if youre a millionare with political connections.
My home is defended by an HK USP, you cant have one.
You proved the point right there, how some armed maniac might come into your house, and you can shoot them...well if you both didnt have guns then it wouldnt matter would it? No one is shooting anyone. I certainly don't feel afraid of being shot in my house.
We don't have the perfect system of government, what i like about USA is that there is less beurocracy. But having said that, everyone is more equal than in many other places, and i wouldn't change that.
Someone still must die.A hot burglury is designed by the criminal to ensure a loss of life as he isnt stupid enough to leave witnesses,I am not progressive enough to die for his right to a lack of witnesses.
In your own nation firearms crimes increased after the ban, they didnt decrease after the ban.Your anarchists, your sociopaths remain heavily armed. What do you have?NOTHING!
My HK USP is none of your business,it doesnt effect you unless I find you in my home.
Your legislature disarmed you and armed your criminal population.This was their progressive goal from the start. WAKE UP!
"No one is shooting anyone"
Here in the US the majority of rape and murder victims cooperate and are unarmed.Over 95% of said crimes occur in states that ban all forms of self defense including handguns.NY for example allows rapists to press assault charges against victims for scratching them and hurting their feelings with spoken words while being raped.
Not after this election, the extremist far left now has total control over congress, the senate, and the white house. Its all BS now, whats more CA and NY determined our election, the true America enjoyed by the majority born in 46 of our states had little to do with the outcome. We were America, we embraced true human freedom, we were the whole of the American Ideal.
What you know of America is NY and CA, you have probably never heard of the rest of us.
He can be armed with a kitchen knife, a baseball bat, a tire iron, etc... I do not imagine a world where I have to make the situation fair for him by not having my USP. I ahve the right to absolutist unfairness and total inequality within my own dwelling. If he has a kitchen knife I want an M240 with 40000 rounds of ammo ready on the belt, in my castle unfairness rules. He has chosen an easy life of taking, I have chosen a life of honor that requires that I earn all that I own.
Think for a moment before you type, and apply logic to what you do type. You said "Then shut your liberal sheep mouth." What I was saying was that U.S. govt. should not allow the sales of guns to it's citizens because it has a negative effect on your civil society, and negative effect for the rest of the western world.
How does that make me a ~liberal~ exactly? And how does it make me a sheep?
A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.
Receiver you have very little understanding of our constitution and the 2nd ammendment. First the spirit of the word "arms" as applying to a "militia" would have been focused on the most commonly used/owned weaponry at that time....guns. All ten amendments pertain to individual rigthts and were never about "hunting or target shooting"
The reason I don't know about the U.S. constitution is that I'm not an American. So why would I care about a foreign civil issue?
I care because organised crime can smuggle guns in from America. Do you have any idea how bad this is? In Australia, the bikey gangs, the mafia and all the other orgainised crime syndicates have been known to have, among other things, M16's, hunting rifles, handguns etc. It's a real issue. It's your "right to bare arms" that helps arm these thugs.
Your standard socialist programming has allied you against human freedom.
I can defend my home with deadly force and face no charges. I can even provide my own healthy meats by hunting.
I can choose to write, say, or read whatever I choose. There are no "hate speech" laws....yet.
America allowed us to be free individuals. We werent supposed to be ruled over, or exist to serve the community on bended knee. America embraced the most sacred rights.
"being progressive and joining the rest of the world."
We are being YOU. Being ourselves is a thing of the past. Now from this day forward all Americans are required to be YOU. Why would we want this? We once had a nation, now we will have nothing.
There is pressure now to help Odinga "correct" the election outcome in Kenya. I sure bet I will have a great time fighting for Odingas Islamic revolution. I get to become a butcher who fights for Allah. The invisible man hungry for blood again.
There was nothing wrong with being an American.Our nation was worth living in. The people were not beholden to serve govt,rather govt was beholden to serve us.The total opposite is true of the rest of the world.
"live in a bubble"
You live on great big animal farm,all in service to sacred cows and just begging for the near religious opportunity to listen to their retarded leftist moos.
Before this election we had a national identity,now we are faceless and blank.
To All... I dont deny/fight Obama as the President Elect, soon to be President. I just disagree with his policies
Thomas Jefferson has put it best when he said, "Democracy will cease to exist when you take from those who are willing to work and give to those who are not."
I've grown up with hard work being instilled in me on a constant basis, why should my money go to someone whose more concerned about getting their next high instead of worrying about their families next meal?
yoso....we had to live through 8 years of lies and ineptitude. Obama is president elect and there's nothing you can do about it. Get ready for America to return to glory pal. By the way America has always redistributed its' wealth....we come from a Christian heritage which teaches us to do so. Sorry if you feel that if you make a half mil a year you'll be burdened by a few percentage points in extra taxes but I'm sure with that kind of income you can shelter most of it anyway.
Yeah, Obama is a commie. The election was robbed from Palin and we could have had her Alaskan system of non-socialist collectivisation, where the state owns all the resources such as Alaskan oil rather than companies. The wealth is distributed evenly to all Alaskans. By cutting Alaskan taxes , taxpayers in other states help by redistributing their taxes to compensate.
Alaskan state owned resource collectivisation is completely different from socialist state owned resource collectivisation.
Good video! "Redistributing the wealth," is code for, "Taking from those who've earned it, and giving to those who haven't." Hmm... I think instead of finishing my last semester for my Bachelor's, and getting a job, I'll just wait it out and live on some idiot's, I mean... hard worker's dollar. I was a fool! Socialism is great! Sit on my arse and get rewarded. What can give that kind of satisfaction? Hard work? Enjoying the fruits of my labors? P'shaw! ;)
Are you saying that you disagree with taking money from taxpayers and handing it over to the military because it's socialism?
Look, the military isn't allowed to make profits that much anymore unless they can take over foreign oilfields, and so we have to redistribute wealth to them. Health insurance companies aren't socialist, we all pay them a fortune each year they earn it! Other nations have free universal health care that costs less per person than in the US, but better dead than red!
My tax money that goes to the military is well-deserved, and hard-earned. The military, police, teachers, EMS, fire - all the people that should be getting paid more, often have the lowest pay. Many of them risk their lives for their fellow citizens daily. Gods forbid people have to actually work! Those that do should get to enjoy what they've earned. Last five words are dead on. Socialism is to communism what getting kicked in the gut is to getting kicked in the face. Go in peace, friends. =)
free market and usa. good joke. the usa is the king of protectionism. the gov. is pumping billions after billions of dollar to protect the farmers. hard work is the truth. but millions of people are forced to have two or more jobs only to have a minimum of financial safety and still without health insurance. free market ? i am curious, how anyone in the usa will live from the wages of a worker in china or india.
lol what the eff is wrong with socialist policies in the first place? ohhh no he has socialist ideas of fairness and justice, run for the hills! please read a wikipedia article or just browse the internet to find out there's a difference between socialism and communism, and then post some asinine bs regarding your fears.
His goal, along with the leftist and progressives was to bring Socialism to America. He is a servant of Big busines who also want Socialism as dreamed by Karl Marx. They will be the masters of this New World order, Obama is only a tool and takes his orders from the Council of Foreign Relations (CFR). Do some research on the conspiracy.
stephenabm 10 months ago
Obama is a dedicated Communist!!! Look at his policies, agenda and bills that were past until the Tea Party movement stopped it!
stephenabm 11 months ago
get over it whinging yanks! everyone pays tax, and everyone will benefit
receiver2005 3 years ago
"everyone will benefit"
Except us.
"whinging yanks"
The EU won the US election this time around. We will now have 3% of our paychecks left over after taxation, thanks to this global presidential campaign. I want to know what YOUR president intends to do for those who lose their homes. I want to know just how limited the constitution will be under YOUR president. Our politics were none of your business, yet Europe rules us again. Maybe we need another revolution.
jackbelias 3 years ago
Forget the president, and don't quote 3% of your paycheck, because thats bullshit. Europe does not rule the USA, it does not vote in the elections. Barack Obama seems to be someone who is actually smart, and realises that a better nation is one that looks after it's citizens.
As for socialism, what the hell is so bad about it? Every developed nation leans centreleft/centre right, USA is almost always on the right, depending on degree.
receiver2005 3 years ago
"what the hell is so bad about it"
We are a constitutional republic, socialism flies in the face of what my country was founded upon. I am not my brothers keeper.
smart, and realises that a better nation is one that looks after it's citizens.
He is doing a better job looking after you, he doesnt give a shit about Americans.
"does not vote in the elections"
There was however international pressure. Look how ALL of you celebrate as if you won this election yourselves.
jackbelias 3 years ago
We are happy that he won because now, finally, the USA will stop invading people!
And how is he looking after us first? No, from what i know, he's investing in public health and education, so that everyone will benefit. Thats not a bad thing, your actually being progressive and joining the rest of the world.
This president has actually looked at an atlas and realised that the "world" isn't just Alaska and Hawaii.
receiver2005 3 years ago
"stop invading people!"
We had every right to our war in Afghanistan. Islam has become a problem.
"public health and education"
No he hasnt, in fact his investments are to go to inner city districts only. His own party in congress and the senate are threatening to stall his financial requests until they are assured that it wont be shared with rural America.
"progressive"
Lenin, Mao, and Stalin were progressive too.
"world"
World, not America, this is the problem.
jackbelias 3 years ago
Oh yuk, Lenin, Mao and Stalin were not Presidents of the United States were they? Mao and Lenin were revolutionaries, Stalin was a war leader. Hmm, George Bush the war leader?
It would be a pretty hard thing to get through congress "oh lets just ive 3/4 of the population receive benefits, but don't worry about the rest of them" yeh, good work right there.
receiver2005 3 years ago
"Lenin, Mao and Stalin were not Presidents of the United States were they?"
Given the election outcome concerning congress, the senate, and the presidency it is fair to say that the progressive ideals of Lenin, Stalin, and Mao have now become our ruling identity.
We might keep parts of one or two articles of our constitution but the rest is as good as gone. Our progressives have rallied against that document since the 1960s. Now they get to burn it.
jackbelias 3 years ago
No, your government is a popularity contest; the one with the most money, wins. And it is a 2 party system, vote left or vote right, thats your choice of president, if you vote at all.
If you said to someone from Russia or China that the USA has their identity, you would be chased out of town, with vodka bottles being thrown at you.
No, America is a low taxing, low spending country, with a lot of negative freedoms which the rest of the western world got rid of
receiver2005 3 years ago
"with a lot of negative freedoms"
Negative? There was nothing negative about our freedoms.
Free speech for the people. The right of the people to bear arms so we may defend the rest of our rights from our own electied officials. The right to a trial by jury. The right to a speedy trial. The right to demand a reasoned search warrent from law enforcement. Such things arent negative.Only a truly free people embrace them, we were once a free people.Now the majority wants none of those rights.
jackbelias 3 years ago
i get what your saying, it's great in theory (like soviet communism) but it doesn't work in practise. How is being able to own a gun and blasting some guys head off without charge a good thing?
We ditched those laws for a good reason, they bad rights! In fact, it actually says the right to bear arms, not guns..what about swords? Can you walk around USA with a giant claymore and chain mail for self defence?
receiver2005 3 years ago
without charge a good thing? "
If done to defend onself or home it is a good thing.I dont see how some violent sociopath has the right to break into my home in the middle of the night armed with just about anything while knowing I will have nothing to defend myself with.
"right to bear arms,not guns"
WRONG!The founders did mean guns. They didnt limit early Americans to running around in chain mail armed with kitchen knives.Such weapons and defense systems are outdated in a modern world.
jackbelias 3 years ago
"it doesn't work in practise"
It works fine,I live in a right to carry state with a castle doctrine.Violent crimes arent as common here as states that criminalize all forms of self defense.
"they bad rights"
It has to do with the right to life,liberty,and the persuit of happiness.You ditched all 3! Your criminals can have belt fed weapons, but you might be able to get a .22 but only if youre a millionare with political connections.
My home is defended by an HK USP, you cant have one.
jackbelias 3 years ago
You proved the point right there, how some armed maniac might come into your house, and you can shoot them...well if you both didnt have guns then it wouldnt matter would it? No one is shooting anyone. I certainly don't feel afraid of being shot in my house.
We don't have the perfect system of government, what i like about USA is that there is less beurocracy. But having said that, everyone is more equal than in many other places, and i wouldn't change that.
receiver2005 3 years ago
" both didnt have guns"
Someone still must die.A hot burglury is designed by the criminal to ensure a loss of life as he isnt stupid enough to leave witnesses,I am not progressive enough to die for his right to a lack of witnesses.
In your own nation firearms crimes increased after the ban, they didnt decrease after the ban.Your anarchists, your sociopaths remain heavily armed. What do you have?NOTHING!
My HK USP is none of your business,it doesnt effect you unless I find you in my home.
jackbelias 3 years ago
"have guns"
Your legislature disarmed you and armed your criminal population.This was their progressive goal from the start. WAKE UP!
"No one is shooting anyone"
Here in the US the majority of rape and murder victims cooperate and are unarmed.Over 95% of said crimes occur in states that ban all forms of self defense including handguns.NY for example allows rapists to press assault charges against victims for scratching them and hurting their feelings with spoken words while being raped.
jackbelias 3 years ago
"less beurocracy"
Not after this election, the extremist far left now has total control over congress, the senate, and the white house. Its all BS now, whats more CA and NY determined our election, the true America enjoyed by the majority born in 46 of our states had little to do with the outcome. We were America, we embraced true human freedom, we were the whole of the American Ideal.
What you know of America is NY and CA, you have probably never heard of the rest of us.
jackbelias 3 years ago
"armed maniac"
He can be armed with a kitchen knife, a baseball bat, a tire iron, etc... I do not imagine a world where I have to make the situation fair for him by not having my USP. I ahve the right to absolutist unfairness and total inequality within my own dwelling. If he has a kitchen knife I want an M240 with 40000 rounds of ammo ready on the belt, in my castle unfairness rules. He has chosen an easy life of taking, I have chosen a life of honor that requires that I earn all that I own.
jackbelias 3 years ago
i cbf reading 4 posts, it's just not worth it
receiver2005 3 years ago
Then shut your liberal sheep mouth.
sixthday132 2 years ago 2
Think for a moment before you type, and apply logic to what you do type. You said "Then shut your liberal sheep mouth." What I was saying was that U.S. govt. should not allow the sales of guns to it's citizens because it has a negative effect on your civil society, and negative effect for the rest of the western world.
How does that make me a ~liberal~ exactly? And how does it make me a sheep?
receiver2005 2 years ago
A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.
Receiver you have very little understanding of our constitution and the 2nd ammendment. First the spirit of the word "arms" as applying to a "militia" would have been focused on the most commonly used/owned weaponry at that time....guns. All ten amendments pertain to individual rigthts and were never about "hunting or target shooting"
sixthday132 2 years ago
The reason I don't know about the U.S. constitution is that I'm not an American. So why would I care about a foreign civil issue?
I care because organised crime can smuggle guns in from America. Do you have any idea how bad this is? In Australia, the bikey gangs, the mafia and all the other orgainised crime syndicates have been known to have, among other things, M16's, hunting rifles, handguns etc. It's a real issue. It's your "right to bare arms" that helps arm these thugs.
receiver2005 2 years ago
"negative freedoms"
Your standard socialist programming has allied you against human freedom.
I can defend my home with deadly force and face no charges. I can even provide my own healthy meats by hunting.
I can choose to write, say, or read whatever I choose. There are no "hate speech" laws....yet.
America allowed us to be free individuals. We werent supposed to be ruled over, or exist to serve the community on bended knee. America embraced the most sacred rights.
jackbelias 3 years ago
"being progressive and joining the rest of the world."
We are being YOU. Being ourselves is a thing of the past. Now from this day forward all Americans are required to be YOU. Why would we want this? We once had a nation, now we will have nothing.
There is pressure now to help Odinga "correct" the election outcome in Kenya. I sure bet I will have a great time fighting for Odingas Islamic revolution. I get to become a butcher who fights for Allah. The invisible man hungry for blood again.
jackbelias 3 years ago
So you don't want to be part of the world? Just want to live in a bubble could loosely, the USA and not care about anything else?
receiver2005 3 years ago
"part of the world?"
There was nothing wrong with being an American.Our nation was worth living in. The people were not beholden to serve govt,rather govt was beholden to serve us.The total opposite is true of the rest of the world.
"live in a bubble"
You live on great big animal farm,all in service to sacred cows and just begging for the near religious opportunity to listen to their retarded leftist moos.
Before this election we had a national identity,now we are faceless and blank.
jackbelias 3 years ago
To All... I dont deny/fight Obama as the President Elect, soon to be President. I just disagree with his policies
Thomas Jefferson has put it best when he said, "Democracy will cease to exist when you take from those who are willing to work and give to those who are not."
I've grown up with hard work being instilled in me on a constant basis, why should my money go to someone whose more concerned about getting their next high instead of worrying about their families next meal?
yosoybyrd 3 years ago
great, why dont we abolish the income tax while we at it. Until that happnes, america will always be partially socialist.
andron333 3 years ago
yoso....we had to live through 8 years of lies and ineptitude. Obama is president elect and there's nothing you can do about it. Get ready for America to return to glory pal. By the way America has always redistributed its' wealth....we come from a Christian heritage which teaches us to do so. Sorry if you feel that if you make a half mil a year you'll be burdened by a few percentage points in extra taxes but I'm sure with that kind of income you can shelter most of it anyway.
wittumy 3 years ago
Yeah, Obama is a commie. The election was robbed from Palin and we could have had her Alaskan system of non-socialist collectivisation, where the state owns all the resources such as Alaskan oil rather than companies. The wealth is distributed evenly to all Alaskans. By cutting Alaskan taxes , taxpayers in other states help by redistributing their taxes to compensate.
Alaskan state owned resource collectivisation is completely different from socialist state owned resource collectivisation.
MeanMarthur 3 years ago
Good video! "Redistributing the wealth," is code for, "Taking from those who've earned it, and giving to those who haven't." Hmm... I think instead of finishing my last semester for my Bachelor's, and getting a job, I'll just wait it out and live on some idiot's, I mean... hard worker's dollar. I was a fool! Socialism is great! Sit on my arse and get rewarded. What can give that kind of satisfaction? Hard work? Enjoying the fruits of my labors? P'shaw! ;)
EmperorGix 3 years ago
Are you saying that you disagree with taking money from taxpayers and handing it over to the military because it's socialism?
Look, the military isn't allowed to make profits that much anymore unless they can take over foreign oilfields, and so we have to redistribute wealth to them. Health insurance companies aren't socialist, we all pay them a fortune each year they earn it! Other nations have free universal health care that costs less per person than in the US, but better dead than red!
MeanMarthur 3 years ago
My tax money that goes to the military is well-deserved, and hard-earned. The military, police, teachers, EMS, fire - all the people that should be getting paid more, often have the lowest pay. Many of them risk their lives for their fellow citizens daily. Gods forbid people have to actually work! Those that do should get to enjoy what they've earned. Last five words are dead on. Socialism is to communism what getting kicked in the gut is to getting kicked in the face. Go in peace, friends. =)
EmperorGix 3 years ago 2
This comment has received too many negative votes show
From IRELAND...
YEAAA! Socialism is good for the soul!!
Congrats to President Obama :>)
tonm08 3 years ago
free market and usa. good joke. the usa is the king of protectionism. the gov. is pumping billions after billions of dollar to protect the farmers. hard work is the truth. but millions of people are forced to have two or more jobs only to have a minimum of financial safety and still without health insurance. free market ? i am curious, how anyone in the usa will live from the wages of a worker in china or india.
bratseth2 3 years ago
hhahahahaha
Long live the left!!!
amsterdam78 3 years ago
socialism isn't communism buddy. you live in socialism right now under Bush.
DHouse69 3 years ago
lol what the eff is wrong with socialist policies in the first place? ohhh no he has socialist ideas of fairness and justice, run for the hills! please read a wikipedia article or just browse the internet to find out there's a difference between socialism and communism, and then post some asinine bs regarding your fears.
fwing11 3 years ago
Sour grapes perhaps, like it or not McCain lost. Get over it and find something better to do with your free time.
geminijd 3 years ago