@Karmelloo Some people have social lives and might want to spend that money on going on with mates instead of on World of Warcraft or whatever you play.
Buahahha you stupid poor kid ^^ That comp costed me only 1 weekly wage, thats all ive ever spent on a computer. Too bad you're 16 or the likes and you dont know what a job is.
@Karmelloo That doesn't change the fact you play World of Warcraft and probably have no social life, and your profile says you're a 30 year old, first year college student with a part time job who plays WoW.. Your life = fail.
No, you need PhysX to see the fluid like this. Without a PhysX enabled GPU the game still runs. Just not as detailed and kinda pointless since that is the point of this game.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Your probably watching this video because ur gonna download the game or som,thing. And take it from me, that this game is complete garbage. its soooo boring, u just walk around a ship for like 3 hours. Trust me dont download it...and im a regular gamer that plays stuff like css, crysis, burnout, left 4 dead. So save money and ur time and dont buy this game cuz its complete garbage
Wooow. I agree with masterpiraka and tolstoievsky. Honestly, do you think every single game out there is gonna be a mindless run-and-gun? Just because it isn't doesn't mean its 'total garbage'. There's different people out there who have different ideas of fun. So next time you're hating on a game, make a post like "Hey, if you play css, crysis, or left 4 dead like me, save your time and money and don't buy this game. You will most likely find this as boring as fuck"
i hat ethe demo version. as soon as the vid is over it just does weird things tells you the status of the FPS and then nothing. whats up with that? ..
Does any1 know if a ATI HD4850 would run this good? I have Quad core 2.40 GHz and 3 GB of ram.. Im very sure i couldnt run it with everything on very high, but.. Would it run good? (yea, i know im annoying... Sorry)
ATi used to be equal until nVidia bought out Aegia's PhysX system and put it only into their cards. Older games such as MoH:A had PhysX that worked on all systems but the developers sucked so it was implemented terribly (ragdolls got all stretchy and turned into elastic bands).
Untrue, the entire system chugs when playing this game with ATI cards, though you can play it you have to floor the graphics if you want anything close to a decent framerate.
yes they are the same but you can't turn on the nvidia phyz-x utility. it does look impressive with it on, however when you're really into this game i don't think you'll notice it unless you're really looking at the small details
its just part of the drivers you don't apply it or anything download the latest drivers and physx is supported its not like something you have to do all it is, is the driver telling the gpu to work the physx calculations instead of giving the cpu something else to do with the 500 thousand other things it has to do with vista lols
if there is only one Graphiccard on the marked, you can play a game with, (8800GT) and even with that not very stable, I wouldn't call the game "better" in any way.
ati doesnt support physx because it is a gimmick, those same calculations can EASILY be made on a modern multi core cpu. nvidia just likes to think the graphics card should do all the work even though the cpu is far less utilized
Also, in an attempt to make a game seem more realistic - why does no-one properly animate the players hand pulling levers or turning handles? Is that so hard?
-Game designers- "Ok so we've got 28 megabytes left before we fill the dvd. We can go for these amazing Direct X 10 water particle effects, or we can add the animation of your character grabbing handles, and pushing doors. Take your pick."
-Project manager- "Who cares if you can see their hand grab the shit. We'd have to hold the camera angle still, and probably piss off the gamer while he/she's being attacked... Lets go for the physics"
I've got a 9800 GTX+ , it handles PhysX comfortably alongside regular graphics; I don't expect you'll need two cards for PhysX games, just one good one.
...not quite. An animation is pre-rendered. Although there may be smaller animations, it is done in real time, and is therefore not an animation itself. As in it reacts to objects. Unlike an animation.
Und btw: Wieso stellt man nicht dar, wie der Protagonist seine Hand ausstreckt und den Hebel auch wirklich greift, um ne Tür aufzumachen? Sieht sau dämlich aus so. Sesam öffne dich *Hand davor halt* - Tür geht auf. Alles klar.
Das ist schonmal ein Schritt in die richtige Richtung. Allerdings sieht das Wasser noch recht unrealistisch aus. z. B. gleitet das viel zu schnell über Oberflächen. Im vorletzten Raum schießt es regelrecht vom Tisch runter. Da fehlt wohl noch ne Komponente Reibung oder so. Außerdem, wie vorher schon oft genannt, noch viel zu dickflüssig und undurchsichtig. Das sieht ja eher aus wie Sp*rma... ^^ Was richtig stark geworden ist, wie der Typ die Fässer auf das gespannte Laken wirft. Respekt :)
Also gut aussehen tut es alle Mal. Aber das Wasser, dass auf dem Boden liegt, sieht nicht gut aus würde cih sagen. Dazu sieht es noch zu Tropfig aus. Ich sehe da nur eher eine Art Schleim^^ also das Wasser auf dem Boden vllt etwas flacher machen oder so. Aber sonst einfach top..
3:36 WTF?
If I saw water like that IRL I'd prob freak out...
SkyHawk0117 3 months ago
Wow, those water effects are just orgasmic (not really). Even now, in 2011, these are some of the best water effects seen in a game. So nice.
TehGamersGarage 7 months ago
It's a shame the game runs like shit.
Girdzyy 1 year ago
@Girdzyy
Shame your computer is shit.
Karmelloo 1 year ago
@Karmelloo It runs like shit on the best machines. Not that you'd know
Girdzyy 1 year ago
@Girdzyy
Lol orly
Phenom II X4 955 3.1ghz
HD 5970
6GB DDR3
And I run it on 90FPS+.
Just cos you're poor and cant afford a good PC doesnt mean others cant
Karmelloo 1 year ago
@Karmelloo Some people have social lives and might want to spend that money on going on with mates instead of on World of Warcraft or whatever you play.
Girdzyy 1 year ago
@Girdzyy
Buahahha you stupid poor kid ^^ That comp costed me only 1 weekly wage, thats all ive ever spent on a computer. Too bad you're 16 or the likes and you dont know what a job is.
Karmelloo 1 year ago
@Karmelloo That doesn't change the fact you play World of Warcraft and probably have no social life, and your profile says you're a 30 year old, first year college student with a part time job who plays WoW.. Your life = fail.
Girdzyy 1 year ago
@Girdzyy
All of it is fake, except WoW, which is a game like all the others.
So if you play games you got no social life ? Way too look at the world, kid ;]
Karmelloo 1 year ago
WOW i am getting this just for the water
360viper117 1 year ago
i can only see fluid in games with DX10?
Annihitate 2 years ago
No, you need PhysX to see the fluid like this. Without a PhysX enabled GPU the game still runs. Just not as detailed and kinda pointless since that is the point of this game.
myg0tpurepunk 2 years ago
Why play a PC Game with a joypad!!
Sulked 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
watch?v=Er7Eg3azHLk
GET THE GAME FOR FREE
Senquell 2 years ago
this came with my 295 fuck yeah it rox
OredhotchilipeppersO 2 years ago
its a shame this game only uses 1 core from the cpu =(
ninjaseven 2 years ago 2
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Game's shit.
No wonder it cost me $30 retail.
Omniverse77 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Your probably watching this video because ur gonna download the game or som,thing. And take it from me, that this game is complete garbage. its soooo boring, u just walk around a ship for like 3 hours. Trust me dont download it...and im a regular gamer that plays stuff like css, crysis, burnout, left 4 dead. So save money and ur time and dont buy this game cuz its complete garbage
HoratiuGuitar 2 years ago
Just because it's not about action doesn't mean it sucks. You probably jumped in expecting a mindless shooter. LOL!
Poor kid.
masterpiraka 2 years ago 10
This has been flagged as spam show
please die. now
Tolstoievsky 2 years ago
Wooow. I agree with masterpiraka and tolstoievsky. Honestly, do you think every single game out there is gonna be a mindless run-and-gun? Just because it isn't doesn't mean its 'total garbage'. There's different people out there who have different ideas of fun. So next time you're hating on a game, make a post like "Hey, if you play css, crysis, or left 4 dead like me, save your time and money and don't buy this game. You will most likely find this as boring as fuck"
VictorySquareProd 2 years ago 3
i hat ethe demo version. as soon as the vid is over it just does weird things tells you the status of the FPS and then nothing. whats up with that? ..
duckieduckr 2 years ago
the fluid flows more like mercury than water, but still impressive
endlsswing 2 years ago
BETTER GRAPHICS THAN CRYSIS
shipsim123 2 years ago
@ shipsim123
Different graphics than crysis...
This is a linear style game, essentially like Half-Life 2. Therefore graphics can be more intents with less strain on your computer.
SilverPotatoXL 2 years ago
Awesome effects. Soon enough they'll actually be able to make streams of water, not just water blobs floating across a floor.
PTemplar1337 2 years ago
Maybe they'll make streams of water out of lots of floating blobs!
3kliksphilip 2 years ago
Comment removed
Kenjineering 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
can someone send me a download link for this GAME plz????
bogoLeader 2 years ago
Buy it
ThaX14 2 years ago
buy it,
Tolstoievsky 2 years ago 4
NO AUDIO?
shehan117 2 years ago
i guess ima be cutting grass all summer just to buy a pc to run it yay
leonard109 2 years ago 2
And people say Crysis has great physics. That is the most insanely realistic physics engine I've ever seen.
MeachamProductions 2 years ago
this game, runs with windows vista?
Xtranger123 2 years ago
ofcourse it runs with Vista its optimized for Vista were not stuck in year 2007 anymore you know. everything runs on Vista these days.
godseesnocolour 2 years ago 16
Does any1 know if a ATI HD4850 would run this good? I have Quad core 2.40 GHz and 3 GB of ram.. Im very sure i couldnt run it with everything on very high, but.. Would it run good? (yea, i know im annoying... Sorry)
Scortch62 2 years ago
ATI dont have Physx so you would not see any of the fancy stuff that you just saw in this game.
NVIDIA RULES!!!!!!!!
gigga97 2 years ago
ATi used to be equal until nVidia bought out Aegia's PhysX system and put it only into their cards. Older games such as MoH:A had PhysX that worked on all systems but the developers sucked so it was implemented terribly (ragdolls got all stretchy and turned into elastic bands).
leewolfgang 2 years ago
wow....I did not know that....Thanks for the info man ;)
gigga97 2 years ago
You are not annoying
The graphics are with ATI the same. But the physics aren't that good. But you can still play it and enjoy it !
ThaX14 2 years ago
Untrue, the entire system chugs when playing this game with ATI cards, though you can play it you have to floor the graphics if you want anything close to a decent framerate.
IamAdamWe 2 years ago
I have an ATI card and it runs just fine on high no problems with the framerate
ThaX14 2 years ago
You must have one hell of a card then, all ive got is 2 hd3870 cards :(
IamAdamWe 2 years ago
wel i got a HD4850 so that must be the reason :)
ThaX14 2 years ago
yes they are the same but you can't turn on the nvidia phyz-x utility. it does look impressive with it on, however when you're really into this game i don't think you'll notice it unless you're really looking at the small details
ninjaseven 2 years ago
wow, thats awesome!!! :D
RAGIG 2 years ago 2
wow again HEAVY GAME! like Crysis
george3dmax 2 years ago
E8500, 2*3,16 ghz + 2 * 9800 gtx = 33 fps avg. in this demo
jimmy1911 2 years ago
I run nvidia 9600GT with direct X 9 and it looks the same like this no differences at all.
Tiger1AuasfE 2 years ago 3
shit I cant run that because of physX :(
Skarlos131 2 years ago
That sure is some really pretty graphics :) but is the game any good ?
Dariuz001 3 years ago
i dont think this season in pc its about releasing the cpu(all 4 of them) job.
its the other way around.
if the branded calculations were not there
this game could run just fine on any strong system.
its just intentionally redusing a system power because the game developer dont like the gpu brand..
oxatk 3 years ago
-microsoft makes dx10 for all vga cards to be equal.
-asus makes a hole in the water that cant be selled because its worthless.
-nvidia finds a way to sell that worthless
and makes cards that cant jump in 3d but they can make holes....
now game developers are creating extra holes to get money from nvidia.
ps dont compaire that crap with crysis..crysis had art in it. this one is all hidding in dark.
oxatk 3 years ago
well, this is definately better than crysis at indoor environments
outdoor environments, if they REALLY tried, would be better than crysis too with this game engine, but they didn't make it outdoor now did they? :P
crysis sucks now xD
super6plx 3 years ago 2
Comment removed
P5BDeluxeWiFi 3 years ago
Does the Nvidia 9800 take PhysX?
BlackSabbath612 3 years ago
all graphics cards from the 8 series upwards support physx
jhunte99 3 years ago 2
Really? How do I apply it?
BlackSabbath612 3 years ago
its just part of the drivers you don't apply it or anything download the latest drivers and physx is supported its not like something you have to do all it is, is the driver telling the gpu to work the physx calculations instead of giving the cpu something else to do with the 500 thousand other things it has to do with vista lols
JuvenileErmine 3 years ago
let's pray this has better optimization than Crysis...
ChickenAttackForce 3 years ago 3
not even close
EarDestroyer 3 years ago
lol wtf crysis is much better ^^
TurkWingTsun 3 years ago
always a retard with that msg...
if there is only one Graphiccard on the marked, you can play a game with, (8800GT) and even with that not very stable, I wouldn't call the game "better" in any way.
liquidminds 3 years ago
ati doesnt support physx because it is a gimmick, those same calculations can EASILY be made on a modern multi core cpu. nvidia just likes to think the graphics card should do all the work even though the cpu is far less utilized
mopman1337 3 years ago 2
download the tech demo yourself then, run it and set the physics to software as opposed to hardware and then just watch your fps drop...
jhunte99 3 years ago
Okay why? I have an ATI and a PhysX Card, runs this Tech-Demo fine.
Sh4d0wRuNN3r 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
wow. i havent seen a less impressive tech demo in years
stoneeh 3 years ago
this is a brilliant tech demo to show off youtube's HD quality.
TehPantheon 3 years ago 3
The water at 04:20 looks kinda like semen :¬(
Also, in an attempt to make a game seem more realistic - why does no-one properly animate the players hand pulling levers or turning handles? Is that so hard?
thecannongod 3 years ago
Yea it's probably too difficult to animate. lol
-Game designers- "Ok so we've got 28 megabytes left before we fill the dvd. We can go for these amazing Direct X 10 water particle effects, or we can add the animation of your character grabbing handles, and pushing doors. Take your pick."
-Project manager- "Who cares if you can see their hand grab the shit. We'd have to hold the camera angle still, and probably piss off the gamer while he/she's being attacked... Lets go for the physics"
Wakkajakka 3 years ago
Holy shit. I've been envisioning particle based physics for years. o.o
Wakkajakka 3 years ago
Werry good quality video 5* ; )
jozsy23 3 years ago
pervers gute Grafik
Sanjayw 3 years ago
alright....time to get a dedicated card for physX
elmntearth1 3 years ago
or a good nVidia card.
tehdaza 3 years ago
I've got a 9800 GTX+ , it handles PhysX comfortably alongside regular graphics; I don't expect you'll need two cards for PhysX games, just one good one.
samadriel 3 years ago
I imagine a 9800 GTX+ will do fine as long as this game is optimized properly.
I'm getting a GTX 280 in a few days so I'm pumped for this game :D
tehdaza 3 years ago
or both ;)
jhunte99 3 years ago
4 me, animations don't look fluent... really weird!! (physx animations)
Sache0190 3 years ago
physx doesn't do animations, it does physics, moron.
FoxHoundUnit89 3 years ago
and how can you see that it does physics? through an animation, f u bi*tch
Sache0190 3 years ago
...not quite. An animation is pre-rendered. Although there may be smaller animations, it is done in real time, and is therefore not an animation itself. As in it reacts to objects. Unlike an animation.
Korurinu 3 years ago
okay, right ... -.- xD
Sache0190 3 years ago
weird looking water, looks like metal shavings in places and mercury in others.
cikame 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
sorry consoles look a lot better, especially 360. and yes i'm right ^^
KnightOfTejas 3 years ago
No, your a fucking moron, and does not deserve to live
vikovikoviko 3 years ago
NA are ya?
Pikey1969 3 years ago
Lol, you don't know shit.
tehdaza 3 years ago
There isn't a game in the world that looks better on a console compared to a PC.
tehdaza 3 years ago 2
Except for Resident Evil 4, but that's just a shitty port so it doesn't count.
FoxHoundUnit89 3 years ago
You're as dumb as a post.
FoxHoundUnit89 3 years ago
Anyone who says the 360 is superior in graphics and hardware has to be either joking or a complete moron.
Greenbunny45 3 years ago 6
Thank you.
tehdaza 3 years ago
I don't think anyone has been saying that. lol
Wakkajakka 3 years ago
Are you completely blind or something?
Greenbunny45 3 years ago
sieht zwar schön aus und alles, aber überzeugt mich nicht wirklich...
die taschenlampe ist echt schlim, die grösse sollte sich mit dem abstand verändern.
MCJoschi 3 years ago
echt geiles game
HQNixblicker 3 years ago
Und btw: Wieso stellt man nicht dar, wie der Protagonist seine Hand ausstreckt und den Hebel auch wirklich greift, um ne Tür aufzumachen? Sieht sau dämlich aus so. Sesam öffne dich *Hand davor halt* - Tür geht auf. Alles klar.
bensch87 3 years ago
Das ist schonmal ein Schritt in die richtige Richtung. Allerdings sieht das Wasser noch recht unrealistisch aus. z. B. gleitet das viel zu schnell über Oberflächen. Im vorletzten Raum schießt es regelrecht vom Tisch runter. Da fehlt wohl noch ne Komponente Reibung oder so. Außerdem, wie vorher schon oft genannt, noch viel zu dickflüssig und undurchsichtig. Das sieht ja eher aus wie Sp*rma... ^^ Was richtig stark geworden ist, wie der Typ die Fässer auf das gespannte Laken wirft. Respekt :)
bensch87 3 years ago
if only the gameplay in most of these modern games would be as good as their graphic engine...
smaniz 3 years ago 3
sehr sehr nice, das blöde is an einigen stellen schaut das wasser wie dickflüssige milch aus ^^
5hio 3 years ago
Das Wasser ist leider viel zu dickflüssig. Hoffentlich wird da noch was dran geändert.
Appl3ju1ce 3 years ago
Je feiner, desto mehr Rechenaufwand ... wird man wohl nochn bisschen warten müssen.
huiuiuiui 3 years ago
Joa schon klar aber trotzdem, wenn man ein Game macht das sich auf Wasser spezialisiert sollte man schon auf den Rechenaufwand scheissen ;)
Appl3ju1ce 3 years ago
far cry 2 = spiel mit dem feuer
Cryostasis = spiel mit dem wasser
Hermel88 3 years ago
Also gut aussehen tut es alle Mal. Aber das Wasser, dass auf dem Boden liegt, sieht nicht gut aus würde cih sagen. Dazu sieht es noch zu Tropfig aus. Ich sehe da nur eher eine Art Schleim^^ also das Wasser auf dem Boden vllt etwas flacher machen oder so. Aber sonst einfach top..
DaKosi 3 years ago
ordentlich :)
paxylein 3 years ago
NV 4 EVA :D
brause 3 years ago
nicht schlecht wird ja immer besser
addiha 3 years ago
Krass! O.o
JackDaniel15 3 years ago