@17Stormy17 , you know how much time one have to dedicate for even a small reversal, and right now my job demands the most of it, maybe later. Nice to hear from you again, love and awareness to you and yours my friend :-)
reverse language is the real language. We need more on reverse speech. more music in reverse. more audio books in reverse. watch movies in reverse. more. more.
The only problem I ever had with reverse speech is that it takes several attempts or a huge block of speech to find a snippet of reverse speech. Therefore it is likely to be a coincidence that the snippets could be interpreted as something decipherable.
Similar to the minds predisposition to facial recognition when some people see faces in objects such as tree bark, toast, the moon etc.
It relates to myth 17, instead of bias or mood of the person transcribing reverse speech, it could be to do with the general speech recognition and interpretation that is inherent in us. The human is predisposed to interpret what appears to be words in reversed speech.
It is probably the biggest myth regarding reverse speech & is what sets it apart between pseudoscience & general science. If research into this aspect was done, it would make RS something I think would be worth considering.
That's absurd. Think for yourself. See Myth 1 and do your homework. Start there and resolve that for yourself, then the others will make sense. Those who can hear plainly and especially those who have collaborated with others recognize that your first statement above is false.
I don't deny that people who collaborate can confer on reversals such as in youtube videos. If the description of the reversal was not given, some might come up with the same transcription but the rate of accuracy would deteriorate.
Regarding myth 3, thousands of people could recognise what appears to be religious symbols in toast for example. Images which are quite specific and complex but can be dismissed as random patterns.
I don't dismiss Reverse Speech, I think more research should be conducted into RS.
I've heard hundreds of reversals over the years, a few highly convincing ones that were related to the forwards speech but the majority were obscure & questionable which is why I tend to think of RS as coincidental. I am open minded & think for myself as well, I use & believe in Astrology which is also considered pseudo-science.
I hope there is progress made in the research of RS & I'll read your website.
@17Stormy17, Of course we agree, I rushed to come to a conclusion, while I was reading the text, before I watched your presentation. My bad!
AlbionsClouds 10 months ago
@AlbionsClouds Thanks for clearing that up. So, are you doing some reversals now?
17Stormy17 10 months ago
@17Stormy17 , you know how much time one have to dedicate for even a small reversal, and right now my job demands the most of it, maybe later. Nice to hear from you again, love and awareness to you and yours my friend :-)
AlbionsClouds 10 months ago
Comment removed
AlbionsClouds 10 months ago
reverse language is the real language. We need more on reverse speech. more music in reverse. more audio books in reverse. watch movies in reverse. more. more.
tsedoklizhi 10 months ago
The only problem I ever had with reverse speech is that it takes several attempts or a huge block of speech to find a snippet of reverse speech. Therefore it is likely to be a coincidence that the snippets could be interpreted as something decipherable.
Similar to the minds predisposition to facial recognition when some people see faces in objects such as tree bark, toast, the moon etc.
MashedTV 2 years ago
I can present the video but I can't make you pay attention.
17Stormy17 2 years ago
It relates to myth 17, instead of bias or mood of the person transcribing reverse speech, it could be to do with the general speech recognition and interpretation that is inherent in us. The human is predisposed to interpret what appears to be words in reversed speech.
It is probably the biggest myth regarding reverse speech & is what sets it apart between pseudoscience & general science. If research into this aspect was done, it would make RS something I think would be worth considering.
MashedTV 2 years ago
That's absurd. Think for yourself. See Myth 1 and do your homework. Start there and resolve that for yourself, then the others will make sense. Those who can hear plainly and especially those who have collaborated with others recognize that your first statement above is false.
17Stormy17 2 years ago
I don't deny that people who collaborate can confer on reversals such as in youtube videos. If the description of the reversal was not given, some might come up with the same transcription but the rate of accuracy would deteriorate.
Regarding myth 3, thousands of people could recognise what appears to be religious symbols in toast for example. Images which are quite specific and complex but can be dismissed as random patterns.
MashedTV 2 years ago
I don't dismiss Reverse Speech, I think more research should be conducted into RS.
I've heard hundreds of reversals over the years, a few highly convincing ones that were related to the forwards speech but the majority were obscure & questionable which is why I tend to think of RS as coincidental. I am open minded & think for myself as well, I use & believe in Astrology which is also considered pseudo-science.
I hope there is progress made in the research of RS & I'll read your website.
MashedTV 2 years ago
I love you
TrenchMonkeyP 2 years ago
thanks so much for sharing.
dwellnhim 2 years ago