Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (48)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • muzzies r anti christ..

  • Haven't watched part 2 yet but the AC is not Muslim. He is an Assyrian..likely from Germany. Hitler was also a part of those decendants. Note WW1 and WW2 was started by Germany. Also the Communist (facism,marxists, Socialists,etc=all the same as communist) Come from Germany. The pcychology being used on our children in the school system originates from Germany--they are brain washing our kids. The last Pope who'll be the false religious leader will also be German. Coincidence?

  • @anddihier - The testimony of Scripture tells us the origin of the Antichrist is the Middle East, not Europe.

  • @arovir ..No the Assyrians were not of Europe, They are the descendants Ham,Cush, Nimrod building the city of Ninevah which built the tower of Babel, etc. The Assyrians were displaced, most most going to the (immediate) North.South.East and West of Israel, but others dispersed to Russia and Germany. I see a pattern Don't you...notice what Ham did to his father Noah and Noah had cursed him and his land. The AC according to Mal.5 as well is an Assyrian.

  • @arovir ..Many do believe the EU is the rising Babylonian Empire Revised. The roots go back as far as time, the Islam/Muslim faith is too new-since Muhammed, which was after Christ which was a religion created via the Catholics whom Muhammed was married to an ex-nun. Notice the same views they both have, especially in the way they deal with women. The AC roots go farther back, they've been here since Noah.

  • wow thats amazing! i love how people can link the old testament to the new! so full of wisdom!

  • @helen1471 It was nice to hear from you. Thank you! What you wrote was like a breath of fresh air to me!

  • If the King of the North is from the area of Seleucid Syria who is or was the King of the East?

    And what about the realms of lysander and antigonus?

    Your identification of the Antichrist as syrian relies on your view that Syria is the king of the North. Is this valid?

    If the King of the North were the northern most of the four would he not be a Greek or Makedonian?

  • @Strefanasha To see what's what I encourage you to study Daniel 11 from the beginning. Only 2 of the 4 parts of the Grecian empire are dwelt on here. The kings of the South were kings of Egypt who were Ptolemy I - VI. The kings of the North were kings of Seleucid Syria who were Seleucus I - IV & Antiochus I - IV. The prophecy of Antiochus IV setting up the abomination of desolation merges with that of the Antichrist.

    Rev 16,12 tells us the king*S* of the east are from beyond the Euphrates river.

  • @Strefanasha..are you talking about Daniel 11:40? There it's referring to "the time of the end" the north would be Syria and in verse 44 Russia which correlates with Ezekiel 38. The south would be Egypt and it mentions Libya, Ethiopia, the army of the East that troubles him is China's massive 200 million man confederacy. Also mentioned specifically is Jordan.

  • Have you done a part 2 yet? :)

  • @Lachance8 Part two is right around the corner! Many blessings to you, LIz. Your enthusiasm is encouraging :)

  • @arovir YOour vids are encouraging! Can't wait for part 2! ;) Liz

  • Wow, I have been so busy that I missed these last vids! Definitely sharing on facebook!

    Thank you, Robert!. Many blessings to you! :) Liz

  • Saw news while ago . very sorry to hear tragedy there sir.Hope you and your family are ok. We will all pray for people there. So very sad.

  • @EastEndWatcher Yes, it is sad news. Shocking. My family and I are fine. Thank you for your prayers for Norway!

  • Nice Job! Many people Miss this and are looking in the wrong place.

  • @NarrowGateMin Thanks! This is exactly why I made the video. People need to look in the right direction and not speculate.

  • Few questions but ill seperate them.

    The bible calls him the assyrian. But some think it could be jewish.

    Irenaeus ,Hippolytus Are suppose be disciples from teach of josh and say this.

    I know little and am not advocating this. Just wondering .With your knowledge can this be ruled out completely. And best examples to..

    Very nice video sir.Very well done .And clear

  • @EastEndWatcher sorry i meant from john disciples i think they where.

  • @EastEndWatcher Thank you for your kind comment. As for the Antichrist being Jewish, I really don't think so. The reasons people have for him being so are not convincing. There is more to suggest he will be a non-Jew, an enemy of the Jews.

  • @arovir but i mean is it possible? or can it be rulled out without doubt. Why did these men who where taught from disciples think so . Also he is master of intrique . And a strong delusion is sent.And deception.Then the Antichrist sits on gods throne.I just cant imagine the jewish people allowing anyone non jewish to do that or be in that part of a temple. and also the verse they except another beside me christ says. Just seems there could be a chance.

  • @EastEndWatcher Irenaeus lived from 125-203 AD and Hippolytus from 170-236 AD. They were not in direct contact with the first apostles.

    The strong delusion doesn't need to point to a Jewish Antichrist. The delusion will be sent on those who have "pleasure in wickedness" 2 Thess 2,10-12, i.e. the world.

    Dan 11:31 says of the abomination of desolation in the future temple caused by the Antichrist that he will come with "forces". He won't be invited to the temple!

    John 5,43 is unclear as to who.

  • great video and very helpful base for further study... there are many opinions about the Antichrist but we must see what the Bible says about him.

  • @feba2 I'm glad you see the video as a base for further study. I would suggest a more in-depth study of Daniel 8 and 11 to begin with! I only mentioned the bare outline of these chapters. There are many more details to be drawn from them. Correlated with Daniel 2, 7 and 9 they give a complete picture of the rise of the Antichrist and his actions. It's a worthwhile study... :)

  • My friend you missed one clue that supports your position and refines the location even further..Daniel 9:26-27 tells us he will be from the people who destroy the city of Jerusalem and the Temple as well.While it was Roman controlled troops they were from Syria and Turkey mainly.not Italy.The bulk of the troops used were Syrian.

  • @Draconus33 :) I'm very well aware of Dan 9:26-27, but I didn't think it necessary to take the time to go into these verses in this video (It would demand a video by itself to show the correct interpretation of the passage in it's proper context). What you say is true. Dan 9 foretells the destruction of the Jerusalem temple in 70 AD. The Roman legion responsible was the 10th made up of Syrian, Turkish & Arabic recruits. We are told the ruler to come derives from the people of this legion.

  • @arovir Cool 

  • Wow, I knew that the King of Assyria was associated with the antichrist in Isaiah and Hosea and Nahum, but I did not think he was literally from Assyria! You just tied everything together for me! Thank you! Always wondered who could be the kings of the north and south in Daniel.

  • @clk3331111 Glad to be of assistance, in whatever way I can. The kings of the south were the kings of Egypt who ruled from mid 4th century BC to mid 2nd century BC who were Ptolemy I, II, III, IV, V & VI. The kings of the north were contemporary kings in the area of Syria etc. who were Seleucus I, II, III & IV, and Antiochus I, II, III & IV. The prophecy of Antiochus IV of the north is "overlaid" by the prophecy of the very last king of the north - the Antichrist. God bless your studies!

  • The "where" is debatable, but the "when" isn't. The parousia of the true Christ is Tishri 10; the parousia of the false Christ is Tevet 10. I have a feeling the "King of Confusion" will come "with all his host" out of heaven, but in whatever manner, it will be on Tevet 10. Just, really, BEWARE Tevet 10.

    Coincidentally(?) in 2012 Tevet 10 will occur somewhere between Dec 21-24 (day/hour can't be calculated because of the nature of the lunar timepiece in relation to monthly renewal.)

  • Awesome job

  • @AsisterofChrist - Now that was an awesome comment! :)

  • @arovir :) Well you just made it so simple...who could deny this?

  • @AsisterofChrist :) I guess those who have made videos proclaiming the Antichrist to be - Obama or Oprah or Prince Charles etc. It's very hard for some people to admit they are mistaken...

  • @arovir very true. And I like that you DIDN'T name the antichrist. I'm pretty sure I remember the Word saying we are not to judge who he is before the appointed time. So let's be educated on where he will come from, but let's not falsely accuse people of such a serious abomination before the appointed time.

  • @AsisterofChrist - Yes, we should be VERY careful about naming names! Those people who are falsely accused of being the final Antichrist (and there have been many) must unfortunately have deep reservations against Christians. It's a shame this "game" still continues. As for me, I have no names on the candidate list!

  • Wow, you have a genuine ability to teach clearly. Thank you so much. :)

  • @Jimvesterstallone ;) Oh, so now you've finally realized I'm nearing your capabilities! :)

    Many thanks for spurring me on, dear friend.

  • Great video!! I'm learning so much through your videos! Looking forward to Part two!!

  • @Rileyportbay You never cease to cause me to make videos faster! lol.

  • @arovir

    that's right lol ( :

  • Excellent teaching brother. Spot on. Hope to see more video's like this one informing God's people of the truth. This is desperately needed.

  • @Larryd1001 Thank you for your support!

  • Thank you Arovir. I always look forward to your videos, so well researched and divinely inspired. I trust that Jahuweh is using you to get us ready for what we are about to face...and are facing. I look forward to Part II.

  • @109876543210ignition - Your encouragement is most welcome! God bless you dear sister.

  • Great job of tying new testament letters to Daniel 8. The anti-christ is indeed Assyrian per Isaiah 10 and 14, etc. The Assyrian lines up perfectly with the King of the North, meaning the Northern kingdom which, as you showed so well, is one of the four empires (Selucid) that came out of Alexanders original kingdom. Great exegesis.

  • @boltingpuppies Thank you for pointing out that the Antichrist is called the Assyrian in the book of Isaiah! This fact certainly underlines the message given to Daniel concerning this man, or I should say the message given to Daniel underlines the prophecy previously given to Isaiah! So we have two witnesses. There are more, but according to the Scriptural formula, this suffices to make the origin of the Antichrist crystal clear.

    Your comment is much appreciated :)

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more