Added: 3 years ago
From: rootberg
Views: 1,520
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (5)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • This is a weak criticism of Hume imo.

    All he doing is making the case for instrumentalism.

  • when he says "...in Geneva - which will probably end the universe" at 5.45 (I just looked him up and I can see now that it's from his Glasgow days) he sounded a lot like Arthur C Clarke. IMO.

  • @McPrfctday by the way... the Gresham website is down... any idea what's happened?

  • Good lecture, so far, though I am not so inclined to reject the value of Hume's ideas on the basis of this attack alone. The issue here seems to be a need for a distinction between (A) a denial of a priori knowledge of reality / the universe; (B) an assertion that we can know nothing more than our 'impressions' and how they relate to one another; (C) an assertion that our knowledge of reality / the universe reduces to / is derived from reasoning based on our sense experiences.

  • Yes, but the theories are based on thing derived with the senses.

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more