Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)
- Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
or sign in to load a different list.
Loading...Saving...
Loading...Saving...
I think Majungasaurus would win cuz there the same size and the juvenile Spino had a weak bite
CryolophoFan2010 1 month ago
Spinosaurus didn't fight with its teeth. They were to conical and straight.
MrPwnagemeister 4 months ago
@MrPwnagemeister they werent straight, they were crooked.
MrZillajr 4 months ago
@MrZillajr And yes, they were straight. For gripping.
MrPwnagemeister 2 months ago
@MrPwnagemeister nerd just enjoy the animation and stop being so technical.
ChrisAmazon 2 months ago
@ChrisAmazon Well, fuck off, then.
Excuse me for being realistic.
MrPwnagemeister 2 months ago
@MrPwnagemeister Makes no sence. It's teeth where made to grab and hold on to things. This can be very usefull in battle. + A 3 ton bite force make its jaws a very dangerous weapon.
SuperheldScottie 1 month ago
@SuperheldScottie They didn't have a three ton bite force. They didn't have specialized jaw hinges or anything else that showed any evidence of a strong bite force.
That's why they probably evolved sharp claws and long arms in the first place. Because they didn't have a strong bite force to kill their prey (which were large fish, small dinosaurs, and pterosaurs).
MrPwnagemeister 1 month ago
@MrPwnagemeister Please don't use youtube as a scource. Spinosaurus had a 3 ton bite force. Or at least, the adults did. (And trust me, for an 18 meter long carnivore a 3 ton bite force is pretty low.)
SuperheldScottie 1 month ago