Wow. You appear to be in your fifties, and yet you have still not grown up. I'll say it again: you're pretty damn ignorant. Do some research before you post videos.
And what makes you so credible? Your continuous immature replies, even without this despicable video, is enough evidence for anyone to infer that you're full of shit.
hey man i know that the trendy thing to do is blame global warming on the western world and i understand that the data used in this argument is manufactured and manipulated. i do however disagree with your view. the data used for real global warming research still shows that we are in fact changing the environment. to what degree no one really knows. its a real problem worth examining. i just wish al gore would stop adding fiction to already difficult scientific research. the scope is to big.
the rushie neocons are sooo much like killers charlie manson and jefferie dahmer that i confuse the three ... they are dangerous and scary ... take mccain and the neocons ... Al Gore said "We're borrowing money from China to buy oil from the Persian Gulf to burn it in ways that destroy the future of human civilization" that only after 8 years, "facing a planetary emergency" ... diabolical .. the neocons spend $400M+ for show biz talk shows to dupe the dopes ... but they had to knock off russert
Myth of Consensus Explodes: APS Opens Global Warming Debate
The American Physical Society, an organization representing nearly 50,000 physicists, has reversed its stance on climate change and is now proclaiming that many of its members disbelieve in human-induced global warming. The APS is also sponsoring public debate on the validity of global warming science. The leadership of the society had previously called the evidence for global warming "incontrovertible."
In a posting to the APS forum, editor Jeffrey Marque explains,"There is a considerable presence within the scientific community of people who do not agree with the IPCC conclusion that anthropogenic CO2 emissions are very probably likely to be primarily responsible for global warming that has occurred since the Industrial Revolution."
The APS is opening its debate with the publication of a paper by Lord Monckton of Brenchley, which concludes that climate sensitivity -- the rate of temperature change a given amount of greenhouse gas will cause -- has been grossly overstated by IPCC modeling. A low sensitivity implies additional atmospheric CO2 will have little effect on global climate.
Larry Gould, Professor of Physics at the University of Hartford and Chairman of the New England Section of the APS, called Monckton's paper an "expose of the IPCC that details numerous exaggerations and "extensive errors"
In an email to DailyTech, Monckton says, "I was dismayed to discover that the IPCC's 2001 and 2007 reports did not devote chapters to the central 'climate sensitivity' question, and did not explain in proper, systematic detail the methods by which they evaluated it. When I began to investigate, it seemed that the IPCC was deliberately concealing and obscuring its method
jroy, are you nuts. The HARD evidence is on MY side, you just refuse to admit it. There is NO evidence "man made" emissions causes any problems. There is NO evidence that co2 is a problem. It is only from left-wing enviromental nut "scientists" that said there was global cooling in the 70's. YOU are a nut.
Gordon, you are too funny. Ever considered doing stand-up?
Why then, do these documents exist?
tinyurl com/6qd48h
Have "environmental-nutballs" seized control of industrial power, in addition to infiltrating the UN, the science academies of every developed nation, and the top research institutes of North America?
Every major scientific institution dealing with climate, ocean, and/or atmosphere agrees that the climate is warming rapidly and the primary cause is human CO2 emissions.
never should federal tax dollars go to programs researching global warming. it is not the place of the federal govt. if you believe that man is the cause of global warming and you have interest in researching it, fund it yourself. but don't force us all to pay for shit that we don't want or need. this govt is BROKE. stop spending money, stop producing money, get rid of the fed, and bring the troops home from iraq.
lol, man i was just watchin ur video on the 9/11 conspiracy nuts and i totally had to agree with u... now im watchin this and thinkin ur also part of a conspiracy theory of those people who still deny that global warmin is caused by humanity. Nothin to be proud of, I'm sorry.
This video is so archetypical of global warming deniers. Appealing to people's common (read: unscientific) sense, you link a small cause to a small effect. In many cases in this world, however, small causes can have drastic effects, as is the case with our climate. Thus, no one should be convinced by your argument.
Even leaders of major corporations, including companies such as DuPont, Alcoa and General Electric, agree that it's time for the federal government to create strong laws to cut global warming pollution.
I just showed you how 1% will empirically make a difference in science. That's all I'm trying to show you. Nothing else. It can be tested and verified through experiment. If you don't believe me take a sip of 100:1 water to cyanide solution and let me know how that goes.
NOTE: DON'T TRY THIS! (just in case...you seem stupid enough to do it)
CO2 as a compound is actually toxic, so you're wrong yet AGAIN. But don't try to change the topic here gordy boy, at this point I'm not even arguing for or against for global warming.
I've shown you that 1% can be significant, so your point is dead in the water. Now please stop making a fool of yourself.
Funny how you patronize me with your "poor deer" line when it's YOU who elicits pity for having the educational system fail so miserably on you.
Poor deer, you are a 25 year old that made a video about skateboarding. Wow, you are smarter than me. I sure will listen to you. People ask me for my advice, when did anyone want your opinion on anything. You have low self-esteem problem. YOU are a nobody and always be a nobody. YOU should check who you are talking to before you shoot off your ignorant mouth.
Bragging about oneself in 3rd person is a sign of inferiority complex, Mr "Renaissance Man". You have a seriously exaggerated idea of your own importance. Unfortunately your unwavering idiocy can only claim so much of my attention.
Ok. I've had it. It's the third time I fall into giving someone the chance to say something reasonable, but this is definitely the last video I watch. Even if only 4% of CO2 is created by humans, that's no reason to keep polluting the oceans and the air with our rubbish. We're making creatures extinct sometimes only to serve us as fashionable cover. It's the pompous attitude that we have to change for a more humble one "in God's gardens".
There is a general consensus for global warming in the scientific community. Now I acknowledge they may be wrong, but I'd rather take the word of people who put their life's work into studying natural phenomana rather than some random middle aged man spewing misleading factoids and statistics without knowing what he's talking about.
deer, the fact that you don't know what percentage of greenhouse is caused by man, proves you have not looked into this issue at all. Use your head, one percent will change nothing. NOBODY disputes that number.
Greenhouse gasses consist of CO2, CH4, H20vap etc. CO2 (our part) has the worst effect and the most increase due to humans.
If you mix 100ppm (1%) CN- in water, you have a toxic substance. If you mix 100ppm (1%) NO3, you have a safe substance. In everyday life, 1% is normally negligible--not so in science.
It's not as simple as saying "durrr just 1%? no problamm!". That's what happens when you get your info from media and politicians (or as a reaction to politicians like Al Gore).
Poor deer, there you go trying more straw-man nonsense. You think tooooo much. ONE percent will make NO difference in science or in anything else. COMMON SENSE not from the media but from logic.
Ten years later residents in Argentina and Brazil are wondering if this winter will ever end. Buenos Aires recorded this Thursday (November 15th) the lowest November temperature in 90 years. Temperature in the Downtown weather station reached 2.5C. Since records began more than a century ago, only two days had colder lows in November. It was in 1914 (1.6) and 1917 (2.4). And ninety years ago the urban heat island effect was much less pronounced than nowadays.
reag, the only drunken fool around here is you. No one disputes these figures. The Gore nuts will tell you that man made gasess are less than 4%. They don't put it out front because they toss around, "we want to reduce man made gasses by 25%". When you wake up and realize that is only one percent of the total the whole story falls apart. Google man made greenhouse gasses.
global warming is another excuse to keep us from using our own natural resources.. these people stand in the way of our countries energy independence with their constant environmental fear based nonsense.. thanks to their ilk we stopped building nuclear power plants so today were even more an oil based economy that needs an oil based solution.. there is no proof global warming is caused by industry, this is an insane political chess move to bring americans to their knees.
Still no sources. You divert away from the question. People with actual intelligence aren't going to believe you without some concrete evidence. If you are Limbaugh's scientific adviser, no wonder Reid wants him off the air.
I really like Bill O'Reilly, but I am a global warming skeptic much like you, Gordon, and Senator Jim Inhofe. I think, in all seriousness, you should go into the No Spin Zone and debate Bill. I'd love to see that!
Over 10 leading SCIENTIFIC organizations around the world all agree that MAN is contributing to the warming of the planet. You or Limbaugh read one article and shoot off figures as if you have any credibility. You conservatives all seem to believe that your god created the planet for you to destroy it. You and the other nuts can listen to Limbaugh and have your speculation seminars.
wake, you are a moron. I have quoted facts that are put out by the global warming nuts. They claim a 1% reduction in gasses will change the temp. Do you have a brain?
Who is they? Who are your sources? Or what are your qualifications so we can substantiate your claim? You are starting to see the split in the Republicans. The one's that believe in science, and the one's who take radio hosts' testimony.
I thought that we don't know how much humans impact climate change. I know the sun has possibly caused some of the destructive climate forces in history. I am always glad still to see people stick it to Oreilly.
the thames river in england use to freeze every year. they would have festivals on the frozen surface. but it eventualy stoped freezing every year due to climate change, long before the industrial revolution. thats only one example.
Ten years later residents in Argentina and Brazil are wondering if this winter will ever end. Buenos Aires recorded this Thursday (November 15th) the lowest November temperature in 90 years. Temperature in the Downtown weather station reached 2.5C. Since records began more than a century ago, only two days had colder lows in November. It was in 1914 (1.6) and 1917 (2.4). And ninety years ago the urban heat island effect was much less pronounced than nowadays.
You said it right there Gordon!
tinrib656 2 years ago
jazz, kid you can't comprehend much of anything. YOU are soooooooooooooo stupid.
gordonbloyershow 3 years ago
you're pretty damn ignorant
jazzmessenger8 3 years ago
jazz, stick to music, when it comes to "global warming" you are an idiot.
gordonbloyershow 3 years ago
Wow. You appear to be in your fifties, and yet you have still not grown up. I'll say it again: you're pretty damn ignorant. Do some research before you post videos.
jazzmessenger8 3 years ago
jazz, get a brain before you comment on MY videos.
gordonbloyershow 3 years ago
once again, a childish reply from a grown adult.
jazzmessenger8 3 years ago
jazz, you are the only child here. You have no idea what you are talking about and you are a fool.
gordonbloyershow 3 years ago
And what makes you so credible? Your continuous immature replies, even without this despicable video, is enough evidence for anyone to infer that you're full of shit.
jazzmessenger8 3 years ago
jazz, I suggest you check who you are talking to. You are a punk kid that doesn't have a clue.
gordonbloyershow 3 years ago
hey man i know that the trendy thing to do is blame global warming on the western world and i understand that the data used in this argument is manufactured and manipulated. i do however disagree with your view. the data used for real global warming research still shows that we are in fact changing the environment. to what degree no one really knows. its a real problem worth examining. i just wish al gore would stop adding fiction to already difficult scientific research. the scope is to big.
gabledorf 3 years ago
the rushie neocons are sooo much like killers charlie manson and jefferie dahmer that i confuse the three ... they are dangerous and scary ... take mccain and the neocons ... Al Gore said "We're borrowing money from China to buy oil from the Persian Gulf to burn it in ways that destroy the future of human civilization" that only after 8 years, "facing a planetary emergency" ... diabolical .. the neocons spend $400M+ for show biz talk shows to dupe the dopes ... but they had to knock off russert
AgnesBojaxhiu2000 3 years ago
Agnes, it is clear that you are INSANE. Get help soon.
gordonbloyershow 3 years ago
Oho! So is this like the only old fart left who actually is still denying the hard evidence?
Buddy, get with the times. The climate crisis exists, and it's because of us.
You can't use simple math on greenhouse gases by the way. It's all overlapping values and stuff. Very complex. Your theory is bogus.
Besides, the target should actually be to cut emissions 90% by 2030.
Anyways, if Bill-O doesn't deny the truth, no-one should.
jroy375 3 years ago
Care for some proof to debunk your theory?
CHECK OUT THIS LINK:
tinyurl com/5utago
jroy375 3 years ago
Myth of Consensus Explodes: APS Opens Global Warming Debate
The American Physical Society, an organization representing nearly 50,000 physicists, has reversed its stance on climate change and is now proclaiming that many of its members disbelieve in human-induced global warming. The APS is also sponsoring public debate on the validity of global warming science. The leadership of the society had previously called the evidence for global warming "incontrovertible."
gordonbloyershow 3 years ago
In a posting to the APS forum, editor Jeffrey Marque explains,"There is a considerable presence within the scientific community of people who do not agree with the IPCC conclusion that anthropogenic CO2 emissions are very probably likely to be primarily responsible for global warming that has occurred since the Industrial Revolution."
gordonbloyershow 3 years ago
The APS is opening its debate with the publication of a paper by Lord Monckton of Brenchley, which concludes that climate sensitivity -- the rate of temperature change a given amount of greenhouse gas will cause -- has been grossly overstated by IPCC modeling. A low sensitivity implies additional atmospheric CO2 will have little effect on global climate.
gordonbloyershow 3 years ago
Larry Gould, Professor of Physics at the University of Hartford and Chairman of the New England Section of the APS, called Monckton's paper an "expose of the IPCC that details numerous exaggerations and "extensive errors"
gordonbloyershow 3 years ago
In an email to DailyTech, Monckton says, "I was dismayed to discover that the IPCC's 2001 and 2007 reports did not devote chapters to the central 'climate sensitivity' question, and did not explain in proper, systematic detail the methods by which they evaluated it. When I began to investigate, it seemed that the IPCC was deliberately concealing and obscuring its method
gordonbloyershow 3 years ago
jroy, if you weren't so stupid you would be funny.
gordonbloyershow 3 years ago
Gordon. You're wrong. Again.
First of all, "Lord Monckton of Brenchley" is not a scientist.
tinyurl com/yawstc
Second, the APS's position has not changed.
"The evidence is incontrovertible: Global warming is occurring."
(tinyurl com/6azn7a)
Marque and Gould are editors of the Physics & Society Newsletter. Check out this article, published in said newsletter, alongside Monckton's:
(tinyurl com/5djcj6)
Make sure to get your facts straight before you post a load of crap, Gordon.
jroy375 3 years ago
jroy, you don't know what you are talking about.
gordonbloyershow 3 years ago
Ooooooooooooooo TOUCHÉ!!
...
Come on, Gordon.
I did my research, and since you are a lazy ass-wiper, you don't even attempt a comeback.
Pathetic.
I can give you one thing though...
You sure know how to copy-paste from JunkScience.
Gordon, it's perfectly normal for any man to admit that he was thoroughly wrong. I'm sure you yourself do it every day.
jroy375 3 years ago
jroy, we know that you are a polar bear lover from Canada. YOU are INSANE.
gordonbloyershow 3 years ago
Gordon. Please. How old are you?
Can we be civilized adults here?
Let's debate the issue at hand:
What are you trying to accomplish by denying the hard scientific evidence? What's in it for you?
jroy375 3 years ago
jroy, are you nuts. The HARD evidence is on MY side, you just refuse to admit it. There is NO evidence "man made" emissions causes any problems. There is NO evidence that co2 is a problem. It is only from left-wing enviromental nut "scientists" that said there was global cooling in the 70's. YOU are a nut.
gordonbloyershow 3 years ago
I wish you could see how hard I'm laughing.
Gordon, you are too funny. Ever considered doing stand-up?
Why then, do these documents exist?
tinyurl com/6qd48h
Have "environmental-nutballs" seized control of industrial power, in addition to infiltrating the UN, the science academies of every developed nation, and the top research institutes of North America?
jroy375 3 years ago
Every major scientific institution dealing with climate, ocean, and/or atmosphere agrees that the climate is warming rapidly and the primary cause is human CO2 emissions.
What do you think Gordon?
Am I nuts now?
jroy375 3 years ago
No they don't and YES you are.
gordonbloyershow 3 years ago
YES.
gordonbloyershow 3 years ago
I believe this childish excuse for a response ends the debate at the score of:
jroy375 - 6
gordonbloyershow - 0
(Although if you could do negative scores, Gordon would be quite fucked.)
Good day to you all.
jroy375 3 years ago
fact: saying something is a fact does not make it a fact.
stupidlonghair 4 years ago
stupid, when I say it is a fact, it is a fact.
Check it, notice no person has denied it on these posts. You can find it by a google search.
gordonbloyershow 4 years ago
never should federal tax dollars go to programs researching global warming. it is not the place of the federal govt. if you believe that man is the cause of global warming and you have interest in researching it, fund it yourself. but don't force us all to pay for shit that we don't want or need. this govt is BROKE. stop spending money, stop producing money, get rid of the fed, and bring the troops home from iraq.
ashlonbb 4 years ago
It's funny how many people despise you and your worthless commentary's Gordy.
The arguments you make are poorly executed and an embarrassment to your fellow in breds.
The only retort you ever seem to make is accusing people of abusing drugs even when they school you.
Grade school name calling is your only option.
Judging by the gruesome caulifowered nose on your face it's obvious that your an alcoholic.
DjBall 4 years ago
dj, you are retarded.
gordonbloyershow 4 years ago
to many numbers i dont understand percents but i agree with you gordon
illegalsout 4 years ago
lol, man i was just watchin ur video on the 9/11 conspiracy nuts and i totally had to agree with u... now im watchin this and thinkin ur also part of a conspiracy theory of those people who still deny that global warmin is caused by humanity. Nothin to be proud of, I'm sorry.
Linu86 4 years ago
This video is so archetypical of global warming deniers. Appealing to people's common (read: unscientific) sense, you link a small cause to a small effect. In many cases in this world, however, small causes can have drastic effects, as is the case with our climate. Thus, no one should be convinced by your argument.
zephyrus001 4 years ago
Even leaders of major corporations, including companies such as DuPont, Alcoa and General Electric, agree that it's time for the federal government to create strong laws to cut global warming pollution.
wakeboard77 4 years ago
I just showed you how 1% will empirically make a difference in science. That's all I'm trying to show you. Nothing else. It can be tested and verified through experiment. If you don't believe me take a sip of 100:1 water to cyanide solution and let me know how that goes.
NOTE: DON'T TRY THIS! (just in case...you seem stupid enough to do it)
deernardz 4 years ago
Poor deer, CO2 is not poison, duh. YOU want to believe nonsense. There is NO consensus in science. It IS or it ISN'T.
gordonbloyershow 4 years ago
Poor deer, in case you have not noticed you are a nameless faceless nobody hiding behind a username. YOUR opinion means NOTHING.
gordonbloyershow 4 years ago
I may be a nobody, but you're a nobody with the delusion that a camera automatically grants meaning to his opinions.
It doesn't.
deernardz 4 years ago
CO2 as a compound is actually toxic, so you're wrong yet AGAIN. But don't try to change the topic here gordy boy, at this point I'm not even arguing for or against for global warming.
I've shown you that 1% can be significant, so your point is dead in the water. Now please stop making a fool of yourself.
Funny how you patronize me with your "poor deer" line when it's YOU who elicits pity for having the educational system fail so miserably on you.
deernardz 4 years ago
Poor deer, you are a 25 year old that made a video about skateboarding. Wow, you are smarter than me. I sure will listen to you. People ask me for my advice, when did anyone want your opinion on anything. You have low self-esteem problem. YOU are a nobody and always be a nobody. YOU should check who you are talking to before you shoot off your ignorant mouth.
gordonbloyershow 4 years ago
Bragging about oneself in 3rd person is a sign of inferiority complex, Mr "Renaissance Man". You have a seriously exaggerated idea of your own importance. Unfortunately your unwavering idiocy can only claim so much of my attention.
have a good day, Madam Fat-cat.
deernardz 4 years ago 2
poor deer, go back to your skateboard.
gordonbloyershow 4 years ago
Ok. I've had it. It's the third time I fall into giving someone the chance to say something reasonable, but this is definitely the last video I watch. Even if only 4% of CO2 is created by humans, that's no reason to keep polluting the oceans and the air with our rubbish. We're making creatures extinct sometimes only to serve us as fashionable cover. It's the pompous attitude that we have to change for a more humble one "in God's gardens".
montiperotti 4 years ago
There is a general consensus for global warming in the scientific community. Now I acknowledge they may be wrong, but I'd rather take the word of people who put their life's work into studying natural phenomana rather than some random middle aged man spewing misleading factoids and statistics without knowing what he's talking about.
deernardz 4 years ago
deer, the fact that you don't know what percentage of greenhouse is caused by man, proves you have not looked into this issue at all. Use your head, one percent will change nothing. NOBODY disputes that number.
gordonbloyershow 4 years ago
Greenhouse gasses consist of CO2, CH4, H20vap etc. CO2 (our part) has the worst effect and the most increase due to humans.
If you mix 100ppm (1%) CN- in water, you have a toxic substance. If you mix 100ppm (1%) NO3, you have a safe substance. In everyday life, 1% is normally negligible--not so in science.
It's not as simple as saying "durrr just 1%? no problamm!". That's what happens when you get your info from media and politicians (or as a reaction to politicians like Al Gore).
deernardz 4 years ago
Poor deer, there you go trying more straw-man nonsense. You think tooooo much. ONE percent will make NO difference in science or in anything else. COMMON SENSE not from the media but from logic.
gordonbloyershow 4 years ago
Ten years later residents in Argentina and Brazil are wondering if this winter will ever end. Buenos Aires recorded this Thursday (November 15th) the lowest November temperature in 90 years. Temperature in the Downtown weather station reached 2.5C. Since records began more than a century ago, only two days had colder lows in November. It was in 1914 (1.6) and 1917 (2.4). And ninety years ago the urban heat island effect was much less pronounced than nowadays.
gordonbloyershow 4 years ago
WoW, for once I'm in total agreement with you.
pos151 4 years ago
Gordon -
Do you have actual scientific evidence to support your "facts," that are actually the rantings of a drunken fool?
reagankilledus 4 years ago
reag, the only drunken fool around here is you. No one disputes these figures. The Gore nuts will tell you that man made gasess are less than 4%. They don't put it out front because they toss around, "we want to reduce man made gasses by 25%". When you wake up and realize that is only one percent of the total the whole story falls apart. Google man made greenhouse gasses.
gordonbloyershow 4 years ago
Gordon, I am still waiting for the ice age they told us was going to happen in the the mid 1970s. Great video! 5/5
ConservativeVoiceUSA 4 years ago
Put the link in the description :)
overmind25 4 years ago
Thanks for the message.
overmind25 4 years ago
global warming is another excuse to keep us from using our own natural resources.. these people stand in the way of our countries energy independence with their constant environmental fear based nonsense.. thanks to their ilk we stopped building nuclear power plants so today were even more an oil based economy that needs an oil based solution.. there is no proof global warming is caused by industry, this is an insane political chess move to bring americans to their knees.
Muzaloth 4 years ago
Who's figures? I will try to find it. Just give me your sources.
overmind25 4 years ago
Those are figures he heard on Limbaugh. No scientific credibility. You may also be able to find those figures on ExxonMobil's website.
wakeboard77 4 years ago
wake, Limbaugh gets his info from me, not me from him. YOU are just toooooooo stupid.
gordonbloyershow 4 years ago
Still no sources. You divert away from the question. People with actual intelligence aren't going to believe you without some concrete evidence. If you are Limbaugh's scientific adviser, no wonder Reid wants him off the air.
wakeboard77 4 years ago 2
wake, I keep posting the link, I forgot youtube blocks links.
gordonbloyershow 4 years ago
I really like Bill O'Reilly, but I am a global warming skeptic much like you, Gordon, and Senator Jim Inhofe. I think, in all seriousness, you should go into the No Spin Zone and debate Bill. I'd love to see that!
JakeandElwoodBlues 4 years ago
Over 10 leading SCIENTIFIC organizations around the world all agree that MAN is contributing to the warming of the planet. You or Limbaugh read one article and shoot off figures as if you have any credibility. You conservatives all seem to believe that your god created the planet for you to destroy it. You and the other nuts can listen to Limbaugh and have your speculation seminars.
wakeboard77 4 years ago
wake, you are a moron. I have quoted facts that are put out by the global warming nuts. They claim a 1% reduction in gasses will change the temp. Do you have a brain?
gordonbloyershow 4 years ago
Who is they? Who are your sources? Or what are your qualifications so we can substantiate your claim? You are starting to see the split in the Republicans. The one's that believe in science, and the one's who take radio hosts' testimony.
wakeboard77 4 years ago
I thought that we don't know how much humans impact climate change. I know the sun has possibly caused some of the destructive climate forces in history. I am always glad still to see people stick it to Oreilly.
overmind25 4 years ago
O'Reilly can be so stupid at times.
vitalfinds 4 years ago
the thames river in england use to freeze every year. they would have festivals on the frozen surface. but it eventualy stoped freezing every year due to climate change, long before the industrial revolution. thats only one example.
somonenamedray 4 years ago
BUT THE POLAR BEARS PEEPEEZ R GETIN SMALAR!!11! oH NoeZ111
matlock044 4 years ago
Thanks for standing tall for America.
americastandingtall 4 years ago
Fact - Mankind is sinking in a sewer of his own making and this guy loves the smell of his ass.
eelzen 4 years ago
Ten years later residents in Argentina and Brazil are wondering if this winter will ever end. Buenos Aires recorded this Thursday (November 15th) the lowest November temperature in 90 years. Temperature in the Downtown weather station reached 2.5C. Since records began more than a century ago, only two days had colder lows in November. It was in 1914 (1.6) and 1917 (2.4). And ninety years ago the urban heat island effect was much less pronounced than nowadays.
gordonbloyershow 4 years ago
Nature will find it's balance.
Man is no exception to it's laws.
Enjoy your fantasy while you can.
You/we are nothing special.
eelzen 4 years ago