Added: 4 years ago
From: thewayofthemaster
Views: 90,765
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (920)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • this is a complete bias debate, why is the evolutionist having to explain every single detail while the religious side gets off scott free?? I don't understand the intricacies of evolution, but that is much more plausible than all our animals being put in a big boat as they brace for global extinction....

  • I'm a Christian and can confidently admit that nightline sure din't get the heavy hitters in this particular debate. Ray and Kirk are evangelists, not scientists or PH.D apologists. RRS is too much of the teenage big sister to really perform well in the debate.

  • @EVSjahms fundamentalists are the only good christians because they are the only people who get close to interpreting the bible without picking and choosing. they get back to the basics. the fundies in nigeria who actually practice the commandment of 'thou shalt not suffer a which to live' actually read the bible

  • Can't atheist make a point with out being insulting. This is just a debate. No one is make you change your believes, which leads me to asking why do you feel so challanged with people who have faith to GOD whenyou don't believe in it anyway?

  • @4GOD316 I don't feel challanged by people who believe in god. But when religion prevents scientific progress, that just pisses me of. It has happened a lot in the past (the earth going around the sun etc) and it's time people grow out of this nonsense. Evolution IS a fact, you would know that if you actually did some research instead of ignoring all evidence and then acting like there is none. There are plenty of christians who believe in evolution because they have actually done some research.

  • @RagOfWar -. I just find it hard to believe that when then planets were formed, this one planet (Earth) was placed in the perfect location that life could live. There is a lot about evolution I don't know, but I did read that if earth were located 100 or 10%miles closer to the sun, life could not survive on earth. The same if the Earth was 10% farther from the sun. I find that very difficult to believe to have happen without GOD's miracles taking place.

  • @4GOD316 Considering how big the universe is, that is not unlikely at all. We have actually found 54 planets that are in the perfect location for life, 5 of them earth-sized, with the help of the kepler-telescope. And that is just a tiny fraction of our galaxy.

  • @RagOfWar Location, temperature, etc. is a far cry from hospitable to life (water, atmosphere, O2 ratio, elements from the star, nutrients for the life to feed off of etc.). If all those were right on, like earth, the chances are still nil that life would spring up. We have (very near) the perfect habitat for life, yet we have never seen life come from non-life. But the real problem for non-theists is the teleology of the initial conditions of the universe for life to be possible anywhere.

  • Isn't there some commandment or something about lying? Tsk Tsk, Curt.

  • Make him stop!!!!! These are the people, who want to drag us back, to the dark ages. Such stupidity boggles my mind.

  • It is difficult to imagine anyone having less basic knowledge of basic science than Kirk Cameron. Seriously, the man's ignorance is jaw-dropping, simply awe-inspiring. Can he read?

  • @WildwoodClaire1 He can read-he's just very selective about what books he picks up, and far more selective about that which he gives credence. He's willfully ignorant. And as he and banana man are making decent bank from this elective-stupidity, there won't be any intellectual epiphanies.

  • @WildwoodClaire1 The trailer for his new film 'Monumental' has him sitting in front of a book. Going by his track record I wouldn't like to infer anything from that scene. Actually, I'm banking on his illiteracy, because if he can do to history what he has done to biology then the pwnage that is coming is going to be something to see!

  • @WildwoodClaire1 Ray comfort is probably the only worthy contestant.

  • "what im about to show you does not exist. these were actually created by our graphic artists"

    wow kirk, thanks for clearing that up for the creationist audience

  • Kirk should stay out of science, but he has a PROMISING career in late night gag comedy with those photos

  • What about a LIGER!!!

  • a horse and a donkey bear a mule

  • All non believers who posted here... you can say what you want for your reasons to watch this video. But your hear because you doubt what you " believe" and your still looking for answers. God is peace

  • @sonnydaydreamer Of course we atheists are still looking for answers. That's kinda the whole point. We won't stop looking for answers. That's what science is all about. I take great pride in the continuing pursuit of knowledge and truth. I'd happily change my views and become a theist if I were shown good scientific evidence that supports it. Until then, I'll continue looking for answers. I'll continue looking for truth.

  • Misunderstanding upon misunderstanding. He made me lol :)

  • The red head is hot.

  • its got to be money in this for them there a nut job's.keep on going kirk your right

  • There is something called punctuated equilibrium theory, that a species can go through sudden changes due to sudden changes in the environment, and then stop evolving almost completely which is where the difficulty of finding transition states could have come from. and micro evolution has been proven, this man is using classic creationist arguments i laugh every time i hear them now. single celled organisms can very likely evolve into what we have today.

  • Punctuated equilibrium is just a hypothesis to explain why transitional states are problematic to evolution theory (as you've just admitted). PE cannot be demonstrated experimentally to explain the fossil record in rocks because it requires millions of years which we don't have. Also no intelligent witness (human) was there to provide any evidence to support this 'science' - the study of medicine, history, archaeology uses this. Modern science is moving away from human evidence to story telling

  • Comment removed

  • I like how he cited adaptations between horses and zebras and yet said evolution between species is impossible. Someone tell Kirk that horses and zebras have infertile offspring and are thus of a different species.

  • I fully endorse the plausibility of the existence of God and I am intellectually convinced of evolution. There goes your argument Mike Seaver

  • Comment removed

  • god, i had so much fun watching everybody's faces while he was going on and on thinking "sure told those stoopid evolutionists!"

  • The author of the boo Harry Potter uses mythical characters alongside historical and factual places.....did Christianity do the same in the past. Where is the real archaeological evidence for the existence the the characters of any of the biblical prophets, its the greatest story ever told

  • through Kirks whole thing about tranistional gaps i was just thinking "THERE IS HUNDREDS OF THEM LOOKING AT YOU RIGHT NOW!!!!" and then Brian said it i was sooo happy!!

  • i have a crock a duck in a cage fore sale 50000$ in very good condition

  • Evolution is a fact!!! Deal with it creationists and actually study it!!!

  • @skeptictom818 please then explain to me why the other animals have not evolutionized to our point of our intelligence or higher.

  • @crazyman2994 Evolution isn't a ladder. It's not the strongest or most intelligent that survive, it's the one that can adapt to change. Also dolphins have amazing intelligence, probably very close to ours. Just because animals can't speak or do math doesn't make them any less intelligent. I mean there are things animals can do that we can't. I am not an expert on this kind of things but I hope this helps.

  • Why do Atheist seem so upset when debating if thats the case don't accept

  • can't blame god for mistakes people make.

  • He who created Evil, is the creator of all Evil. The majority of serial killers were christians.

  • @JesusFknChrist666 A self-proclaimed Christian does not always mean true Christian

  • Such a handsome man, such a stupid twit. He understands nothing about evolution yet mocks it. Pure ignorance, Kirk. Shame on you.

  • Comment removed

  • How do people get this far, become so famous as speakers, and not even understand the counter arguments. EVERYTHING IS TRANSITIONAL!!! EVERYTHING IS ABOUT ADAPTATION. And who gives a fuck if Darwin ever expressed skepticism. That's because he was rational and going against the world.

  • I laugh at some of the posters here saying god is peace. Really? I think all the women killed during the witch hunts would argue against this and that's just scratching the surface. Add all the scams from so called Evangelists, all the wars and inquisitions, end of times prophecies...list is endless. Christians will counter that and say it's men or the devil, not gods work. Well what exactly is gods work then? Is it to sit idly by while the devil destroys us or we destroy each other?

  • My god! I can't believe how stupid Ray & Kirk are. They know nothing about science and even have the balls to ask are we taking scientific evidence on faith because some scientist said so. It's science boys, science tries to base itself on experiments & facts, not blind faith. There's new species being found all the time, new creatures being born & evolution is always in motion. I'd rather believe a museum of bones showing evolution than a book written 1000's of years ago by primitive men.

  • If anything is possible, then why not just believe that God created the earth and everything in it?

  • I don't understand the growing pains guy's arguments.

  • Kirk likes to pick and choose the scientific evidence when he thinks it supports his position... either the scientific method works for all physical subjects or none at all..

  • brian as well. dont get so defensive. if you know something is 7million years back. prove it. dont just say look it up. cause man makes up things all the time just like you said yourself. atheism takes belief as well. if you believe there is no God. then you are putting your FAITH in it and backing it up. athism contridicts it self.

  • @BFFFL16 It was proved with radiometric dating. The other side's protests against this are fatally flawed - of course it's possible that people lied about the results of radiometric dating but doesn't one then have to discount all evidence for everything on the basis that it could, feasibly, not be true? The frankly overwhelming body of evidence supporting evolution can't be dismissed just because it is possible that it might have been faked. Anything is possible.

  • on kelly's part....she shouldnt be so attitudy when kirk and ray are being so nice with soft answers. A gift from God is peace. thats what kirk and ray have. kelly is being attitudy and looking for claps and responses from the audiences, kirk and ray are not. read Proverbs 15:1. this is a good example of not being ashamed of the gospel of Jesus Christ. Every knee will bow and tongue confess romans 14:11

  • I was interested to read KIrk's claim of Darwin setting 100 year time limits on his theories; what publication was that taken from?: I should appreciate a verifiable source, as I've never read of that....

  • kirk and Ray: there's a reason why Jesus said not to give that which is holy unto dogs or cast pearls before swine. Reprove not a scorner lest he turn again and rend you. Jesus said, he that is willing to hear, let him hear....those who are unwilling to hear the truth will not hear it no matter what kind of reasoning you try to apply. If scoffers didn't believe Jesus himself, who else could make them believe. Those who are willing to hear will hear.

  • @jamessremos Some of the audience and or youtubers veiwing this vid may be willing. Somebody has to take a stand against willful athestic ignorance.

  • @jamessremos Explain how "scoffers" could believe "jesus himself", when he was never there to tell them in person. Well if snakes can talk so can a corpse right?

  • God is real, and is coming back soon!

  • Kirk Cameron really is dumb. Its annoying that freedom of speech allows stupid people to be heard.

  • wow let me see if i can quote mine too!

    psalms 14.1 b

    not that hard -_-

  • Kirk Cameron was never an atheist he is using this to stay famous

  • Believing in micro adaptation and not micro adaptation is like believing in an inch but not a foot.

  • 3:00 in and that lil dude doesn't understand the concept of time , he thinks his life is so significant , he thinks his life is sooooooo important , he cannot see what can* happen before and after his life ends.begins :( ,,,, he is sad and pathetic.

    *(sp)

  • Comment removed

  • 50 seconds in and NO BUDDY i have never said everything comes from nothing, don't generalize ok mate.

  • The funny thing is that if the crocoduck existed it would disprove evolution.

  • QUOTE MINING! yeah!

  • Wow! Really?  They have found thousands of transitional fossils? wahahaha I am surprised that he didn't get laughed off the stage - lol...

  • Brian doesn't know what he's talking about. He even looks unsure about everything.

  • It's really the fault of evolutionists to even allow this clown to "debate" on an equal platform. You're giving him status just by allowing him to speak.

  • YES! WE are the transitional forms! He's exactly right. Over millions of years, we can see that animals have constantly changed through genetic mutations.

  • @ArtistryofDebauchery Animals HAVE changed within their own species, not from one species to another. And WE aren't the transitional being until there's something (or someone ;) ) we've evolved into. There are no missing links between man and apes. Or for any other "types" of species. DNA analysis would prove it

  • @ArtistryofDebauchery There's a simple test to determine a hominid from an ape. If you have a bone at the top of your nose that enables you to wear glasses, you're human. Same thing if you have a small bone at the base of your nose between your nostrils. Easy. No matter how skulls are misaligned to appear apelike (jaws thrust forward) or "artistically recontructed" with modeling compound, look for those two things. Unfortunately dremel type tools are capable of removing features..

  • I'm actually in pain listening to Kirk talk

  • looks like he is (Brian) sinking in quick sand!!! LOL

  • kirk cameron says: lets look at the theory of evolution ... we start with nothing and then all of a sudden there's a big explosion and that produces everything... i think kirk is referring to the big bang and abiogenesis.. not evolution ... you have great knowledge my boy!

  • those atheists look worried...

  • 1:05, clearly unsatisfied by Kirky boy.

  • its always amazing how dumb Kirk Cameran is. If i were a christian i would ask him to please stop talking in public becasue he's making you look like idiot.

  • kirk cameron has no mind.

  • The irony of the crocoduck is that it is a creature that could only be created by God...only God could create it ab inititio, or could fuse genes from wholly different species. Evolution can't create a crocoduck--it can only follow lines of direct descent. The absence of such bizarre fusions from the record is actually evidence against God's involvement.

  • @NevilleRhysBarnes really? Can you actually prove this and back it up with evidence or are you just speculating like a typical christian and distorting facts to fit your narrow view of reality?

  • @LonghornPhysicist I don't think you've understood what I'm saying.

    I'm not a Christian or a creationist, and I am trained at degree level in evolutionary biology.

  • Oh Kirk... you're so misguided...

  • God and Evolution can coexist. It's only the case God does NOT exist. The whole argument about the "missing link" has been blown apart so many times kirk is either woefully ignorant or he is just being plain mischeivous.

  • I love how creationists think that evolution can be observed generation to generation.

  • @01:57 perfect example of the misundertanding of speciation.

    you breed dog with dog you get a dog capable of breeding(successfully) wiht another dog

    you breed a horse with a donkey...you get a mule(sterile)

    thanks kirk, more evidence that creationists do not know what they're talking about.

  • Does Kirk smoke crack?

  • @brmadman4455 That, or he's just comfortable with lying.

  • "Genuine LIVING transitional form." Well there's your problem...

  • Isn't Kirk Cameron just adorable?

  • It's an insult to the audience who have spent time and money and made a effort, when Kirk and Ray make comments like "There are no transitional fossils"....comments that they have made NO effort in seeing if they are true or factless...its fine for the audience to make an effort, but for Kirk and Ray to make an effort, it obviously too much for them. You think there are no transitional fossils? Then name some and say why they are not evidence...dont just recite the childish comments!

  • 1:03 .... the epic "FFS not this stupid misunderstanding again!"

  • Kirk cameron is an idiot

  • This editing of the debate is so dishonest! Huge chunks of the debate cut out where the opposition completely destroy all of Ray's and Kirk's arguments and continues on to ask Ray and Kirk questions. Ray and Kirk never give any good responses, but you can't tell how badly they failed to answer the questions because the questions have been cut out!

    More than ever I wish the star rating system was back so I can give this 1 star. But for now I'll have to be satisfied with one real big thumb down.

  • @zippythewildone if this is true then i'd like thewayofthemaster to respond to this as it doesn't make them look very good, oh and im not an atheist.

  • Did this guy seriously just call a Zebra a horse? Really?

  • These atheist has so weak arguments and thats why they get angry. They go on the defense, "ok, im smart and you are low educated, how can you not understand this".

  • @dannywizz The rationalist should not get angry at the view of others but they do have to point out when what they hear is not true. You don't have to be a genius to understand evolution but you have to be in denial to understand creation. It is frustrating to present evidence in a debate when you realize the the mountains of evidence will not the enough, no amount of evidence is enough to break through the denial.

  • @b991228 Well, evolution is a very weak theory but it is the best we have it is said. I agree that some creationists makes laughable claims. However creationsism and Inteligent Design are not the same. ID is a belief that is common among scientists.

    Evolution is taught as a full proof theory but it is a extremely weak theory and that is why so many scientist are silenced if they accept ID.

    Just watch NO INTELLIGENCE ALLOWED, it is a excellent documentary about how science is suppressed.

  • @dannywizz No intelligence allowed is laughably shit made by a bunch of non-scientists whose wealthy Creationist friends peddle this crap. It is not a weak theory at all, hence why 99.5% of scientist in the field consider it scientific fact. And ID and creationism are the same, just look at the Kitzmiller v Dover case and its outcome. The debate about evolution was over more than 100 years ago. You have to deal with it

  • @TheGamanic Surely you have not seen the movie. Instead of watching bias parts of the movie on youtube then watch the whole movie.

    ID does not work against evolution it simply states that there must be some intelligence behind it because randomness is extremely unliklely.

    Whereas creationism argues against those parts the evolution theory that are weak and arent providing any real evidence.

    I bet you didnt know that it has been a planned cospiracy since 1950 to teach evolution in schools?

  • @dannywizz ID and creationism are the same, the creation "scientists" have been trying desperately for it no to be the case but the truth hurts." It has been a planned conspiracy to teach evolution",it has been to support the theory the evidence from the fossil record, genetics; that's why it is one of the strongest theories around. Is it really a conspiracy that real science is taught?

  • @TheGamanic Ok, so what you are saying is that Bin Laden really is behind 9-11? Cause you don't seem comfortable with going against the official story regarding evolution and other ideas.

    There are tons of evidence that evolution has been on the political agenda for more than half a century.

    So I guess also that you buy into this Global Warming thing also?

    Sorry man, ID and Creationism is just as wide apart as Atheists and Agnostics are.

    I find some creationists crazy too...but just some...

  • @dannywizz To be honest, I am not going to get into a debate with someone so hostile to science just because it is not inline with your political and/or religious views. No experts in the field believe that evolution or global warming are myths, if you just looked at the science and not those funded by rich oil lobbies then you will soon realise that

  • @TheGamanic You should check out the Iron Moutain video on youtube, it is based on a report from the Kennedy era. It is one of many older sources on all of this.

  • @dannywizz I don't care for stuff that has been debunked by people. I think even the writer of it confessed it was a hoax and a satire, not an actual report. Anyway that's irrelevant to the science of evolution, which is a massive thorn in the side of the literalist Bible readers.

  • @TheGamanic You think, you think, you think.......sorry, You dont think!!!

    Well, your a hopeless case. Instead of being great you choose to be average, going with the wind.

    You do know that that report you are saying is a hoax actually predicts Al Gore as the spokesman for Global Warming 20 years before.

  • @dannywizz "Instead of being great you choose to be average". A little egotistical on your part, don't you think? If you believe those crackpot beliefs, of course you believe in creationism as it has ABSOLUTELY NO EVIDENCE IN ITS FAVOUR and is not a scientifically falsifiable theory. If you want to be a rational, living being don't let these unsubstantiated fantasies rule your life

  • Plus, if people actually pay attention, they will find that the Bible is the true, active, living word of God.

  • ask this ding dong about the use of science to discover and verify that the planet was full of human beings, communities, spirituality, agriculture etc tens of thousands of years before his buddy arrived. I ma so sick of religions - all but Animism that is.

  • @TheBerserker50 If you believe in the existence of souls or spirits, where do you say they come from? Have you seen these spirits and do you have a spirit guide who helps you make life choices?

  • God is Jesus! Jesus is God! I pray you will see into the supernatural realm after reading this comment. May you see the god you are serving!

  • @Conservmom man made lies you hold to be true. how about the tangible immutable truth of Natures Laws. please stop foisting your lies onto others ...stop with this ludicrous destructive dominion.

  • @TheBerserker50 The Bible tells us that there are laws of nature—“ordinances of heaven and earth” (Jeremiah 33:25). These laws describe the way God normally accomplishes His will in the universe.

    God’s logic is built into the universe, and so the universe is not haphazard or arbitrary. It obeys laws of chemistry which are logically derived from the laws of physics, many of which can be logically derived from other laws of physics and laws of mathematics. God allows everythg to exist!

  • We need MILLIONS of transitional fossils to even begin to prove the theory of evolution. And even some of them, such as "Piltdown Man" was faked.

  • @LivingHopeWorshiper Why millions?

  • HahahaHAAAAAA that guy's face at 3:02 is classic.

  • @punkcity At that point he should have said your argument clearly has proved that evolution is true. Because you sir are a transitional form, because no human being could possibly be this stupid

  • "this is what evolutionists have been searching for hundreds of years" . Yet this genius claims to know Darwin's book is about 150 years old.

  • You notice the Christians nicely sit and let the atheists speak as soon as the Christians say anything the guy has to mutter stuff. I am a transitional species? So my kid is a different species? Also science shows we are devolving not evolving lmfao. Dude research it. The universe is slowly falling apart as is our own species.

  • Oh I see its evolutions fault, its not oh say, the fact that yore bible, has more holes in it then swiss cheese.

  • The theory of evolution has nothing to do with a big explosion or starting with nothing. He is getting the big bang theory and abiogenesis mixed up with the theory of evolution. Whales evolved from four legged land mammals and there are many transitional fossils to prove it. Whales still have finger bones in their flippers.

  • @john17972 Show me some of these transitional fossils you always speak of because when I go looking for them almost 99% of the time real scientists who believe in it say there are none.

  • Its funnier, cuz there is a crocoduck, except its the other way. Its duckcroco LOL

    its called Anatosuchus, but then theres also the Velociraptor mongoliensis which is basically a small T-rex with feathers :D cool ha?

  • The reason these people don't accept evolution is that they don't understand it. The crockaduck pictures show this

  • @MrWillsauce well me being one of "these people" in fact i do understand it. I understand that evolution is just a way for scientists to try and say that they control their destiny and future and that they don't need a God in their life because they have it all. I also understand that you people believe the idea of humans forming from monkeys and snakes having legs. Why is that ridiculous theory easier for you to believe than the truthful reality of a God who sent his son to die for you?

  • @Legomygrego16 yeah you could live 90% of your life committing crimes just accept him before you die and it's quits. You do good because you fear hell or the reward of heaven. Guys who do things out of conscience but does not believe is going to hell.

  • does this mean i am going to turn to a human dog fish person? Wow i will eat from my dog bowl in the next year. I just i better stock up on dog food and fish food.

  • @catjonathandog I hope that question is a joke

  • does this mean i am going to turn to a human dog fish person?

  • One day, the mystical generation of Jesus and his so called “virgin birth” will be classified along with other fables of equal rank. The people most intent on keeping these ancient fables alive are the men and women who make their livelihoods from the “faith industry.”

    Not surprising, these folks have a direct financial interest in supporting religion because they profit from it. Christians United for Dollars. Hallelujah !

  • If Brian and Kelly are so smart, and they believe what they are saying, let them win the 10,000!!! Why are they only smart-assing instead of providing the proof?

  • @TandTfan They did prove it. Sadly wayofthemaster edited out the proof. Go search youtube for the right version that actually shows the debate.

  • @KiloBlessings because these two creationists are so idiotic it's painfull

  • These voices that are impatient in the background are REALLY irritating. 

  • Yeah, we're all thinking "look at the platypus."

  • horse+donkey=mule

  • @billbo1154 microevolution

  • Why edit the video this way? It's a debate, just let it roll.

  • @killer3596 It was edited this way due to YT 15 minute restrictions back when the videos were uploaded.

  • @thewayofthemaster Oh so that's why they are no more than eight and a half minutes each and more than half of the opposing viewpoints are cut out along with the moderator's remarks. I just watched the whole thing on another channel where it's not chopped up and this is seriously slanted editing. I'm not saying you're being manipulative, or unethical, just one-sided. You should put the whole thing up now, there have been much better debates on both sides anyway where's the harm?

  • @thewayofthemaster I have found the original transcripts, you edited this video around the time of the debate when Kirk and the other mustached man begin to stumble on their words and do not have explinations for the points brought up with the RRS. The person moderating this you tube channel has edited this in order to hide the fallicy of the chritian point of view. You Fail.

  • @thewayofthemaster id recommend everyone going and watching the video unedited and actually listen to it all

  • @killer3596 I've seen the full videos, trust me, the editing is better because the moderatory would want to make you rip your ears out.

  • @TheAlexacaius I've seen them too. It doesn't bother me. I don't want to hear one sided debates, even if it's the side I agree with.

  • once one of these transitional forms pops up, wont he just say it's a strange being that god made too?

  • @TheWizardOfOsborne If we had a strange way to look at the past and see speicies evolving, they would say that the Bible already talk bout that, but that they misinterpreted it

  • But its completely plausible for there to be a God who created everything from nothing? Who created the god if your so strung up on creation and intelligent design, what intelligent being created god and so on and so forth. Saying he always was is a cop out.

  • @DaAmazingAntiTheist so your assuming there was another creator before God right? at sometime we are forced to stop asking that and realize that there had to be something that has always existed.God is that infinite Being who has always been and who was created by no one.our finite minds cannot comprehend the infinite. we can try to think of the highest number, but we cant do it. we must not limit the infinite God by our infinte understanding.

  • @MV67786 I don't know if you can comprehend infinite, but I sure can. It's very simple. And if you're god is infinite and, as most christians/other monotheists say, you're god is a kind and loving god. Explain the killing and the ordering of killing of millions if not billions of the people HE supposedly created and that HE supposedly loves all of us. Frankly, if you love someone unconditionally, you don't kill them. These statements contradict each other.

  • @creasonbryan so your saying God killed those people? are you blaming Him for what people do to one another?

  • @MV67786 He gave orders to kill them. In 1st Samuel, chapter 15, Samuel, God's prophet who speaks God's words to us, said:

    This is what the LORD Almighty says: ‘I will punish the Amalekites for what they did to Israel when they waylaid them as they came up from Egypt. 3 Now go, attack the Amalekites and totally destroy everything that belongs to them. Do not spare them; put to death men and women, children and infants, cattle and sheep, camels and donkeys.’ ”

    Babies. He wanted babies dead. Why?

  • @creasonbryan you have to know the difference though. God doesnt give orders to kill innocent people, rather to Guilty people. the babies you say? they are affected for what their own people did. and you shouldnt of asked me that question, because the answer is in the verse itself.

  • @MV67786 Anyone that kills a BABY-a person who in all probability doesn't even know how to feed themselves, much less be held accountable for what their parents did- is immoral. It doesn't matter if you're a deity or man, that's disgusting. There's a word to describe what God ordered on the Amalekites: Genocide. Let's see... who else was big on the genocide? OH YEAH, all those people in history we think are complete monsters. Weird.

  • @creasonbryan what kinda of a God would God be if He wasnt just? God is both loving and merciful but He is also just. He has warned and told many times, but no, we are so stubborn, they were stubborn.

  • @MV67786 Just? That's a laugh. This deity destroys whole cities on a whim, he destroyed the majority of the world once, and orders the death of infants. And if he's the creator of space, time, and everything, he decides the definition of just. Why decide that baby-killing is just? Why not in a corner somewhere where no one went? And why couldn't he just let bygones be bygones and forgive Adam and Eve? And why does the rest of the human race have to pay for the sin of Adam and Eve?

  • @creasonbryan God wont let your sin go unpunished. He did not let the sin of the Amalekites go unpunished. He had to destroy everything even the children because they would end up doing the same. God wouldnt kill the innocent. sin is so serious to God (Mark 9:43-48). He did forgive Adam and Eve. we dont have to pay for Adam and Eves sin, we have to pay for our own.

  • @MV67786 children are innocent. if you believe otherwise, you're probably either evil or crazy. probably. just my opinion.

  • @MV67786 So, according to your logic, if people sin, we should kill their children, because they must pay for the sins of their fathers. Way to go with that logic.

  • @MV67786 Infinite is not to hard to comprehend on the other hand can you see yourself living for all of eternity though? Not only that but would you really want to? I just think that Kirk is a terrible debater and those pictures made me laugh so hard i cried.

  • I'm deeply embarrassed for the entire New Zealand educational system that it somehow churned out a moron like Ray Comfort, too. What went wrong ?

  • bryan's face at 3:00 says it all. he's literally trying to find a word that describes how stupid kirk cameron is.

  • @atheist6in6a6foxhole Is there ANY word in ANY language which could describe Kirk and the Creationtard's stunning degree of utter insanity and ignorance ? I've been looking, but I can't find it.

  • The moderator is pretty biased. Is there a version where I can just watch from an unbiased standpoint?

  • I've never seen a monkey start to become half human( or a quarter) there's no transitional form. I'm not changing, last time I checked I still look like me( a human) Evolutionists are stubborn fools with no logic!!!