The whole reason for the fight is to pass the torch, in a manner of speaking. By having the Trex die, it leaves room for the Spinosaurus to jump into his role.To be perfectly honest, these two would have never had a conflict with each other. If I remember correctly, they live in different habitats and survive off of different sources of food, so there never would have been a fight like this. If they did run into each other, they probably would have just continued going their separate ways.
Tyrannosaurus Rex was actually the smallest of the large-sized land carnivores of its time. It WAS large, but it could not compete (in size) with others like Spino, Carcharadontosaurus, and Giganotsaurus. However, it had the largest (and most powerful) neck and jaw muscles of them all. Its bite power easily surpassed each one of them. The bite that the T-rex dealt to the Spino's neck should have severed the Spino's head - T-rex's bite was over 3000 lbs/square inch, and could crush bone
te equivocas un cerebro inteligente contempla que el cuerpo spinosaurio es mas fuerte que el rex y un cerebro como el tuyo nesecita contemplarlo mas de 20 dias.
i like this ending! much better than JP3 that movie is a piece of crap man!
joe johnston sucks balls.
T-rex wins any fight they come into.hes faster stronger and bites harder and can see better.spino only can swim and has arms.i dont think they would aide him in any fight.trex arm 3.3 feet spinos 6 feet.not much difference there.............
Though many Spinosaurus specimens that were found were larger than that of a T-rex, it was primarily a Piscivore, this means that they ate mostly fish, this is shown by there jaw being more lengthened, the T-rex was designed with a huge and powerful jaw for eating larger prey, that first bight to the neck should have been a more crippling blow
I CHAT IN ITALIAN AND YOUR TRANSLATE andate ben a vedere ce una fotovecchissima dello scheltro originale a berlino fa vedere che ha un cranio abbastanza grande la mascella robusta puo uccidere anche t-rex poi non sono stati trovati ancora tutti i resti di questi percio non parlate
@MUAIYAD Yeah, I just translated what you said, and that is completely bullshit. Spino's jaws weren't capable of clamping down on T-Rex due to the fact its width, height, and thickness of the snout gives it only a 10,000 newton biteforce compared to T-Rex's 60,000 newton (translates to energy) biteforce.
Spino's only true defense is size, which is great to have but at the same time will always have its own flaws. Even to that, its hips were not pulled far apart, which T-Rex's hips were
@MUAIYAD pulled apart better, giving it that far wide stance. Spino was only perfectly suited for its environment and niche, that was why it wasn't so successful as the Tyrannosaurs who took from North America to Asia.
You shouldn't even try to win a debate against me. I will prove you wrong...
@CHADE47lol Trex is said to have had stronger teeth, but overall spino is stronger. for one thing it's bigger, and for another thing it has long, almost human-like arms, so even though trex is king, it is indeed true that sadly, spino is stronger :_(
@teardropkiller400 Size doesn't prove shit and Spinosaurus didn't have human-like arms its like saying that an Unarmed Human is stronger than a Chimpanzee.
@CHADE47lol Look, I can see your point, but you've gotta face the facts: regardless if spino's arms were human-like, they were still very long. If trex had somehow fallen down during a fight, It wouldn't have been able to get back up due to it's stubby arms, but a spino could have, since it's arms are long. I agree with you that trex is better and would win a fight, but spino is still stronger (but still wouldn't win). This argument is pointless.
@CHADE47lol Oh right, I forgot about the spine thing. So I guess falling down would be fatal for both of them. Now, I've done a lot of research on spino and trex, and it says that trex had longer and stronger teeth, but spino has more overall body strength. So I don't think the creators of this movie were innaccurate when they had spino kill trex, because maybe the teeth were just strong enough to hold trex's neck, and then snap it. But I still say trex wins 7 out of 10 times.
@TheDinocam I will agree with that, but they aren't a huge factor in a fight since the arms are directly under the body which would be great if it was a fish or a small dino. But considering this fight is between T-Rex and Spino, arms aren't an option for Spino to use.
@TheDinocam That is completely incorrect about the arms of a spinosaurus. I'm sure everyone else will argue about this too. But Spino's arms weren't muscularly built, which it couldn't swing its arms. Its arms were too slow and it couldn't even swing out infront of it due to its inability of having its arms dislocated. It would have to stand REALLY tall which indecently make it fall over on its back and break its spine which was connected to its vertebrae, snapping its back and die.
@MrTobyCure I will speak in Italian then translate e tutto sbagliato spino aveva braccia ben forti e facili da muovere per spellare il pesce poteva ben allungare la mano e uccidere t-rex qui lo uccide perche ha un DNA modificato quello chuck norris che lo rende il triplo piu forte percio stai zitto bambino leggi libri o vedi documentari prima di parlare
What if T-Rexes and Spinosaurs were actually very docile herbivores that enjoyed tea parties and ballroom dance? Wouldn't you all feel a little silly arguing who would win in a fight?
@HeavyMetalandGames93 Crocs rip without serrations. the jaws were thicker and shorter than a gharial. Size does not matter, expecily when some are smaller
@HeavyMetalandGames93 the teeth are the same shape. DID YOU EVEN LOOK AT THE PICTURE???? spino had a deeper skull than a croc. It could rip. even baryonyx could eat an igaunodon.
@HeavyMetalandGames93 teeth are big and round. no tooth in any animal for 600 million yaers was hollow. Think hugecroc teeth. look at real skull on wikipedia.
look at the skull of spino on wikipedia thats real. the tooth is thick as half the length of the guy's finger in thickness. it is as long as the guys finger, and it was broken.
@HeavyMetalandGames93 no, i said EAT each other. Spinosauruses size, not just length would make it as strong as at rex. the muscles were just stretched out it. was at least 10 feet longer and 5 feet taller.
@HeavyMetalandGames93 top preditors do not eat other top predators because they could not get enough energy. though weak for its size, the size probaly made it as strong as a t rex. the length of bones would make up for thickness
KRSsven has a good point, I think it's important to remember that the fossils found is the only story teller. It was less than ten years ago when Rex lost it's crown as the biggest carnivore because they discovered a bigger fossil, not a bigger species. With that said I think spino might have been bigger on average, but was it more ferocious?
Unfortunately, T. rex has become cemented in our minds as the most iconic dinosaur. This leads to the clear bias you see below. All of the scientific evidence shows that Spinosaurs routinely grew to a far larger size than tyrannosaurs (bigger than in JP3) and were probably around twice as heavy. That's before you consider the display advantage a spino gets from the sail. In the end, it's JP that made people really love the rex, and JP that changed that perception.
@themixedarts See further below. Their teeth continually regenerated in exactly the way crocodile teeth do today. Biting a rex wouldn't produce a wound as bad as rex teeth would, but it wouldn't damage its teeth any more than crocs do when they attack animals. Even crocodiles and alligators do not solely eat fish; the Spinosaurs would've had greater variety in their diet thanks to their greater mobility. Like most predators it would've eaten anything it could take, even another theropod's kill.
@HeavyMetalandGames93 i disagree but im not going to fight about it, at least your just stating your opinion rather than simply saying the t rex should have won without actual evidence. by the way (dont flag for spam) i think you should watch planet dinosaur: the lost world if you havent already, amazing series
@HeavyMetalandGames93 And does that make them Natural Predators of each other? NO. They Obviously dont attack one another consistently to eat. Territory and mating are not means for food, but they still may eat their contender if it is killed. Doesn't make it a Natural predator. And a T-rex would rather hunt a young Tricera bc their weaker, but if it had to get a older one, they try to get it alone. Obviously prey arent just gonna sit back and let themselvs get eaten, which is y they stay 2gethr
@HeavyMetalandGames93 Omg for dear sakes i meant that COMPARED TO OTHER PREY, spinosaurus had a better chance of hurting a Charchar than say idk a duckbilled dinosaur that lived in Africa. Why don't you think big predators dont attack other big predators, because they could hurt themselves and although they may win, it's at the risk of being unable to hunt for your next meal. Spino could inflict enough harm to do that to a Charchar, which is why they avoided each other.
@HeavyMetalandGames93 First off, lets get this through, Spino HAD NO NATURAL PREDATORS ONCE SO EVER. Dinosaurs don't attack dinosaurs that have a better chance at harming them. Ok, now.. If Spino moved away from the coast for dry seasons, then most of it's diet WOULDN'T be fish, it would have been built to also be able to tackle larger dinosaurs, Spino required tons of meat, it actually ate so much, fish was plentiful and spino could be wasteful. Dinosaurs scavenged thru Spino's leftover fish.
@HeavyMetalandGames93 That is a stupid question, of course it didn't have natural predators. That's like asking if Hyenas have natural predators. Lions dont just go around hunting other carnivores which could lead to a battle which could IN FACT bring harm to themselves and injure them so they can't hunt. Charchar had weak jaws, just sharp teeth, and could not in fact tackle large prey, it bit the animal, then waited for it to bleed out before finishing it off. Spino stayed near the coast.
@HeavyMetalandGames93 Again, as i said before, it's not a NATURAL PREDATOR. THEY WERE NEVER SUPPOSED TO INTERACT ONCE SO EVER. The only reason they DID was due to the fact that DROUGHTS occurred in Northern Africa and SPINOSAURUS had to move INLAND, where it was forced to COMPETE with CARCHARODONTOSAURUS. FORCED SO IT COULD TRY TO SURVIVE. STILL, Carchar may have been intimidated by Spino and after a few bites back and forth, occasionally given up a meal or two, BUT evntualy Spino went extinct.
@HeavyMetalandGames93 Obviously it has no natural predators when it's full grown, kinda obvious? If you thought i meant as a baby, realize that all baby dinosaurs had predators.
@HeavyMetalandGames93 did i say it wasn't. Darn it man read. Your first comment said Spino was large for defense, but why would it look defensive if it had no natural predators -_- The evidence you were talking about showed Carchar in fact didn't prey on Spino, but moreover fought against it over carcasses. The broken spines show conflict, not being eaten. Actually, spino probably won a few carcass battles, just not enough to survive as a species.
@HeavyMetalandGames93 Wrong, they initially had no conflicts once so ever, one owned the land, one the water. It's only when droughts kicked in that spino was forced to hit the land and was forced to attack Carchar due to it's food supply being gone. They fought over carcasses of dead dinosaurs. So in summary, spinosaurus wasn't built to look defensive, because it had no enemies to begin with
i think in reality a spino would have been no match whatsoever for a t rex.T rex was heavier,had a much greater bite force,was smarter,probably quicker and more agile.had they met, i think any fight they might have had would have been over quickly.i believe a t rex would have beaten carcharodontasaurus as well,for exactly the same reasons.It was a later model,the end time dino evolution killer.
@jxxxjppp T. rex only weighed around six tons (its weight was very recently revised downward). The lower estimates for s. aegypticus are around 10-11 tons, so truly large specimens were probably twice as heavy as a rex. Nobody knows anything about dinosaur intelligence, it's all speculation. Lastly, evolution does not work the way pop culture thinks it does. Later does not equal better.
you just reapeated that part were trex bites spino so it would look like he won, when spino really won which is 100 % true and who ever rights back against me i wont listen because trex lost and thats it alright.
@godzilla9567 Well I think it's just a movie and these two carnivores did not live at the same time. Really have no idea who'd win but seeing as the spinosaurus was much larger than the t-rex and had functioning arms it is most likeliest to win. But I still see the T-Rex as king of the dinosaurs.
@godzilla9567 the Spino's teeth were for spearing fish thats why it has a long snout for catching fish so It can breathe while cathcing fish, ware the Trex has bone crushing teeth and jaw just like the hyeena. One bite from a Trex would do alot more damage then the spino's and even if by some magic from god himself the spino won the battle it would die shortly after from the gravous wounds it would have gotten but that wouldn't make for a good movie
@godzilla9567 Spino's brain was smaller than T-Rex's, therefore it wouldn't have been smart enough to kill T-Rex like that, instinct or not. Besides, there's a reason why the T-Rex was known as the "Tyrant King"
@godzilla9567 I'd like to point out that the result of the Spinosaur beating the Tyrannosaur was based only off of Jack Horner's advising. Jack is an advocate of the theory that the Tyrannosaur was a scavenger, despite never having published a scientific paper on it, and the evidence to the contrary (the Tyrannosaur's stereoscopic advanced vision). It is more widely accepted that the Tyrannosaur both hunted and scavenged. Jack used his conclusion to state that the T. Rex would lose.
@godzilla9567 While in actuality, the Tyrannosaur would have likely have won, as his predatory instinct as well as 30 million years of evolution were on his side. As well, the Spinosaur was much more likely to consume fish and likely would be much less adept at hunting on land than the Tyrannosaur. Bigger, yes. Better? No.
this is why i hate jurassic park now. i used to love it but because they put this fight scene in i'm pissed. the spino was built for hunting fish with sharp teeth to puncture the fist to kill it. the T-rex was built to rip huge chunks of meat out of its prey. they've shown that T-rex had one of the strongest bites ever and that a bite to the neck like that would of crushed the spino's wind pipe or broken the neck. there's no way in hell the spino should of won.
Crocodile teeth continually regenerate, the new tooth grows inside the old so when the tooth falls out, the new one is immediately ready. So we know that Spinosaurus not only had a similarly shaped skull to a crocodile, but had very similar dentition to them as well. Croc jaws are designed for biting and holding rather than crushing, but they have immensely powerful jaws. So spinos very likely had a crocodile-style bite, very powerful but designed to trap rather than crush or slice.
I don't think anybody would say a crocodilian has a weak bite, yet these animals are primarily piscivores. It's likely Spinosaurus had a powerful bite in proportion to its size, just like a crocodile. In modern animals, the combatants use display, size and aggression to drive each other away. We already know the Spino was bigger, possibly even more so than in the film. The rex may well have backed down, especially since they weren't fighting over a kill.
This evidence suggests S. aegypticus was far bigger in sheer size and weight than T. rex, which had the better weaponry in its jaws. They were quite capable of killing each other: a large rex of 6 tons or so has a crushing bite, but a large spino of around 15 tons has more than twice the weight. So the current evidence shows that Spinos were not 'defensive' and were quite capable of fighting other, smaller theropods. I like how 'lightly built' is defined as 10 tons, heavier than T. rex ever got.
Fossil evidence suggests that both theropods were the apex predators of their environment. It shows that T. rex (based on muscle reconstruction) had an immense bite force (some scientists revise the big figures to around 24 kN as a realistic estimate), whereas Spinosaurs had a (relatively) weaker bite. The key evidence is the current size estimates - it's though that T. rex was up to 12.8m long and 6.8 tons. S. aegypticus' upper limits were 18m long and 20.9 tons. Spino has the advantage there!
@KRSsven I don't know how long 18 meters is, but I know 20 tons is very ridiculous for a predator when you have big animals that aren't even over forty feet long and they still weigh 6 to 7 tons. Let's get some facts straight here though. Spino's build would not let it be that heavy, due to the fact it was not completely based on muscles. In my opinion, it at least eight 9 to 11 tons at least, which is truly heavy. Its body design too wouldn't allow it to get that heavy. Unless it was as fat
T-rex and Spinosaurus. Spinosaurus would never have won, partly because it was a fish eate and its teeth weren't designed to slice, rather grip, but mainly because Spinosaurus died out roughly 95 million years ago, whereas T-Rex soldiered on until the end. Oh and T-Rex evolved after Spino's were dead
I agree that the evidence strongly suggests that T. rex actively hunted Triceratops, the partially-healed bone injuries are quite clear. Spinosaurus is likely to have been a terrestrial predator with a fishing bias (this is currently accepted by the scientific community). We don't know whether it could've tackled a big ceratopsian, but the known facts suggest it wouldn't have fared as well. Tyrannosaurs and Ceratopsians were locked in an arms race - Triceratops would be a tough kill.
@KRSsven Well truth is, all factual evidence clearly shows spino was a specialist on fishing but very bias on land. You can even see it, long narrow neck and snout equipped with weak jaws and hollowed weak spearing teeth positioned just for fish and high up nostrils. Its sail also made it more adaptable in water while very stiffen, non agile, not swift and much slower on land then what it would be without it. Because of spino's major disadvantages such as its delicate sail, it was too frightful
@condemned6436 In the paleontological community it is accepted (for the moment) that Spinosaurus was a terrestrial predator that had adapted to a particular niche. Its bite may have been weaker than that of a Tyrannosaur, but it was still capable of hunting and killing fast-moving prey, which it would've had to do in dry seasons. In the fight they filmed the rex gets the first bite in on its neck, which would've probably resulted in a mortal wound. The Spino was still capable of killing one.
@KRSsven T-rex actually had the perfect spot to sever and distroy important arteries, vessels and the actual vertebraes and with 12in steak knife sharp railroad spikes enforced by steel smashing jaws would guarantee it. In 2008, even though they had more then enough evidence to prove spino was a primary fish eater before, it was then when it finally declared and labeled as a piscivore due to overlapping factual evidence.
@condemned6436 Yes, I already pointed out that in the fight as filmed, the bite from the rex would've caused serious injury if the correct purchase was found. I think it's assumed that 'piscivore' means that a species eats only fish, which is untrue. Crocodiles are primarily piscivores but take whatever they can. Spinosaurus needed to be able to hunt other, larger prey than fish due to dry seasons. It's already known that its environment was prone to seasonal changes like the Nile of today.
@condemned6436 It does. It has virtually identical jaw structure to a gharial, which are the second-largest crocodile species. It needed teeth and jaws strong enough to lift the giant sawfish Dalpiazia stromeri which was even larger than today's sawfish that can grow to over 20 ft. So it had strong jaws and a strong bite, but when compared with T. rex obviously its jaws are weaker. It could go up against Carcharodontosaurs, at least as big as a rex, which is known thanks to healed bite wounds.
@KRSsven They jaws are only identical at first glance but spino actually has a delicate fragile skull with small jaws and hollowed teeth. Spino can hunt 15-20ft fish but not because it had strong jaws but if it's quick enough, it can take it out using it spearing teeth and neck to pull it out and immediately drop it on land, probable wont break its teeth, or at least not a lot of them(all fish are completely defenseless if grabbed by the sides). This technique wont work on land basted prey.
@condemned6436 They haven't found enough skull remains to calculate its skull tolerances, which were very likely similar to a crocodiles since they occupy a very similar niche (it shared the habitat with giant crocs like Stomatosuchus). The sawfish we know it fed on were much bigger than modern ones, which can reach ~23 ft. By hollowed teeth you're actually referring to dendition that crocodilians have, where the new teeth grow inside the old, continually regenerating.
@KRSsven There are actually major difference between crocs and spino such as body design, structure, etc and spino doesn't have the jaw designs of a croc, its delicate jaws are too narrow while being overly elongated and equipped with weak hollowed teeth and had relatively small jaws that couldn't possible withstand it. Spino is really a primary piscivore but mainly hunted smaller dinos if not scavenge from carch.
@MrTobyCure I didn't say it was as large as a sauropod just as smart as one, although I have to admit that's perhaps pushing that expected intellect a bit too high though for a primitive spino...
@condemned6436 I think that is considerably low for a predator. All predators are smarter than their prey, so I would think Spino would be smarter than a sauropod, but by very little. For predators, all you need to do is be as smart or smarter than your prey.
@MrTobyCure Spino did not hunt sauropods, in fact it was clearly unable to barely catch medium sized prey. Weak jaws, long stiffening sail that logically made it a very cautious and frightful animal, lacking physical strength and musculature, the least agile of all theropods in general, too slow, arms being too inflexible and not very effective, etc(proven false).It has been strongly proven to mainly hunt fish, you don't need a lot of intellect to fish. Let alone spino's brain is extremely small
Actually the upper estimate for S. aegypticus is 20.9 tons. Though there is evidence they fought with Carcharodontosaurs, there is no way Spinosaurus was a prey animal for it. They would've clashed over hunting areas or individual kills. Hunting another predator is going to take far too much energy and carries too much risk, espcially if it is bigger (they're never found a bigger predator than Spinosaurus).
@TheHeynear Of course Spino could win, how couldn't he? First of all, I'll agree with you that T-rex is heavier, but he is so heavy that he's got PERFECT balance (hence the small arms to even himself out) so if he gets off balance just a bit, he'd fall and couldn't get up. Second, Spino isn't just a fisherman, he was also specialized for hunting giants like sauropods, large crocs, and other theropods. And third, dude, look at his claws. They're meant for shredding flesh off of bone.
@JurtMushku hahaha are you fucking kiding me? That is total bull shit! spinosaurus wasnt remotely designed for killing theropods OR sauropods! he was designed for smaller, easier prey. why? those jaws were weak and narrow, becoming a perfect example of biting off more than you can chew. it's jaws would have broke in half under all of the thrashing t.rex would have done while he was trying to escape. and dont get me started on those claws.they couldnt have even grasped t.rex! they wernt designed
@JurtMushku to go past a 30 degree angle! They were meant for grabbing on to smaller, more insignificant animals. how do i know this? look at acrocanthosaurus. massive carnivore in north america. it had the most powerful arms of any animal of it's time. they only had one flaw, as do all other animals with arms like it. Since their bodies were bent over and in an aquard angle, it was impossible for them to bring the arms up farther than to scratch its own chin. A.K.A: little under 30 degrees.
@JurtMushku now, t.rex has the most powerful bite of any animal to ever live, surpassing that of even megoladon. Once t.rex had his jaws over spinos neck, the battle is over. Nothing on earth can escape those jaws. over 1000 pounds per square inch. it would have broke spinos neck before spino even had time to figure out whats going on. It is pure fact. T.rex has the weight, the power, the speed, and the experience of fighting other large, more agressive animals over spinosaurus. for instance,
@JurtMushku take tricerotpos into example. It was a truly lethal animal, with 3-6 foot horns on its frill and a beak full of mollars that could snap bone with ease. it would charge and kill any animal that posed a threat to it's wellbeing. the only animals that dared to challenge them are either other tricerotops or t.rex. tyrannosaurus used it's teeth, being the size of a banana and as sharp as razors, to snap the horns and kill tricerotops. it it were spino, it would have died in seconds. fact
@JurtMushku tricerotops. a truly lethal creature. t.rex would activly hunt and kill tricerotops on a daily basis. spinosaurus wouldnt last 5 seconds with tricerotops. in te end, rex fought way more aggresive and dangerous animals than spinosaurus. spinosaurus had less experience with othe lethal animals. t.rex would have won in the end, and that is final. that is fact. if you dont believe me, hundereds if not thousands, maybe even millions of people will.
@Rocketdream7 Sigh, I've been arguing with people about this ALL DAY the last two days on multiple videos, and what I've really learned is that IT'S JUST A MOVIE!!! These two creatures were both fearsome & powerful but the NEVER lived together and would've never actually done this. This was for a sci-fi movie, so there is absolutely no reason to continue this Rex vs Spino debate. By the way, how would you KNOW what T-rex did on a daily basis? They're extinct! You can guess but you won't know.
@JurtMushku true, and your right. how DO i know. i dont know. but, there is enough proof that i can say t.rex activily hunted and killed them. the fact is in the bones of both t.rex and tric. tooth marks and horn punctures are scatered all over eachothers remains. i can make a hypothosis that t.rex hunted tricerotops. end of descussion. all i wanted to do is INFORM you that your statement was incorrect, and that spino couldnt have won. but, you are right, this would NEVER have happened.
@Tobius11 WRONG SIR! Raptors (every kind) were most likely the smartest. Rex probably only had two thoughts, "Food, food, food, food!" and "I gotta go pee."
why so many T-rex fans? the spinosaurus are the most cool of them and the biggest just because its has bigger teeths and much stronger bites the spino can still win if it gets the neck of a t-rex with the mouth and use his hands to break it. Remember this Spino is still the most intelligent of those two and bigger and faster. If spinosaurus where living the same time as t-rex he would defenitely win in real life but he lived longer time ago and lived by fish he would win if he was a meat eater!
@333rapero pfft fuck spinosaurus. if i wanted to, i could give you a page on how t.rex would have won and what t.rex had on spino that made him the clear victor.
OKAY. Why the fuck would a T-Rex leave a gaint, fresh meal to derp around chasing things that aren't even as big as one of its claws. No predator would do that. LOL LOGIC IS NOT THERE.
@IFMIStupidFox Yeah, maybe for five seconds. But you wouldn't see a lion completely leave a kill to derp around chasing a bird. The length and effort put into this chase = no logic. Fact.
if only you knew how arrogant you t-rex fans are >.> spino is real btw SDCDIABLO lol and it WAS built stronger then t-rex... for it had to compete with carcharodontasaurus which.. is bigger then t-rex and t-rex only had to compete with like... raptors? PLEASE RESEARCH YOUR FACTS BEFORE YOU COME TO CONCLUSIONS
@mrtowelie2 That's incorrect. What you said about Spino being stronger is just bullshit. T-Rex has much more better features than Spino due to evolution being on T-Rex's side. Spino is much more primitive and cannot battle against such a hypercarnivore like T-Rex. T-Rex's biteforce would be the ultimate factor in winning the fight against Spino. T-Rex is just too powerful for Spino to handle.
@MrTobyCure Exactly! Plus, Spino wouldn't exactly be much of a competition against Carchar, since to our present knowledge it was a fisheater mainly, while Carchar was strictly a land predator - they both controlled their own areas, which makes perfect sense!
And T-Rex bite was the strongest of all land animals - that IS a fact and it could kill an animal heavier than itself (Triceratops for example, it was heavier than T-Rex) in one successful charge!
people stop trying to save t-rex >.< in the movie the spino was actually smaller then it really is... its JUST as strong in bite force but it has many things t-rex dont... USABLE ARMS for one it weighs more and its longer it EASILY can beat t-rex dont try to hard to prove me WRONG cuz u cant.. its pretty obvious if u know facts.
its nt tht the spino was stronger the trex slipped up n gt his neck broken everyone says the movie sucked becuz the trex lost, hyenas kill lions becuz they slip up n i kno hyenas are nt stronger thn lions lol same thing so stop commentin on every jp3 video wit the trex losin to the spinosaurus sayn its stupid becuz of tht get over urself its a good movie
@Mrtoshirohitsugaya10 They arn't a real thing, that "spinosaurus" in the movie was some wierd morbid mix of like 5 different dinos. It was also too small or the T-Rex was too big
@Mrtoshirohitsugaya10 Well ya obviously theres like 4 different species, but I ment the wierd random non existant mind creation thats depicted in the movie isn't a real thing, all they did was make like a super t rex mixed with like an alligator. The movies spinosaurus was such a fucking fake joke, it wasn't related to any dinosaur at all, just pure fictionalized!
Guys remember. This T-Rex was a freaking baby. No where near an adult.
ISetYourFaceOnFire 2 days ago
cmon poeples , you always think that the t-rex beat all the fight but its ot true
sweetie4beauty 1 week ago
The whole reason for the fight is to pass the torch, in a manner of speaking. By having the Trex die, it leaves room for the Spinosaurus to jump into his role.To be perfectly honest, these two would have never had a conflict with each other. If I remember correctly, they live in different habitats and survive off of different sources of food, so there never would have been a fight like this. If they did run into each other, they probably would have just continued going their separate ways.
RuffiansCheshireCat 2 weeks ago
Tyrannosaurus Rex was actually the smallest of the large-sized land carnivores of its time. It WAS large, but it could not compete (in size) with others like Spino, Carcharadontosaurus, and Giganotsaurus. However, it had the largest (and most powerful) neck and jaw muscles of them all. Its bite power easily surpassed each one of them. The bite that the T-rex dealt to the Spino's neck should have severed the Spino's head - T-rex's bite was over 3000 lbs/square inch, and could crush bone
TheOfficialOnyxBlack 2 weeks ago
YEAH! Way to Go T-Rex!
MultiDinoguy 2 weeks ago
te equivocas un cerebro inteligente contempla que el cuerpo spinosaurio es mas fuerte que el rex y un cerebro como el tuyo nesecita contemplarlo mas de 20 dias.
Sorpof 3 weeks ago
that first t rex bite should kill the spino
deathsaurer123 3 weeks ago
of course spino crushed t-rex
MrSenya02 3 weeks ago
i like this ending! much better than JP3 that movie is a piece of crap man!
joe johnston sucks balls.
T-rex wins any fight they come into.hes faster stronger and bites harder and can see better.spino only can swim and has arms.i dont think they would aide him in any fight.trex arm 3.3 feet spinos 6 feet.not much difference there.............
nyelement007 3 weeks ago
making it look like a street fighter match would have been AWESOME!
Creaturecre8ter 1 month ago
you should have done it like street fighter
Creaturecre8ter 1 month ago
t-rex isn't called tyrant lizard king for nothing
TheBlackViper1007 1 month ago
im team spino but i still lllllllllloooooooooooooovvvvvvvvvveeeeeeeeeeeee trex
klaybobrocks44 1 month ago
Though many Spinosaurus specimens that were found were larger than that of a T-rex, it was primarily a Piscivore, this means that they ate mostly fish, this is shown by there jaw being more lengthened, the T-rex was designed with a huge and powerful jaw for eating larger prey, that first bight to the neck should have been a more crippling blow
Pestcontrol69 1 month ago 6
Q: Why did Spinosaurus beat T-rex?
A: It's a movie.
AlyfromtheWoods 2 months ago 5
I CHAT IN ITALIAN AND YOUR TRANSLATE andate ben a vedere ce una fotovecchissima dello scheltro originale a berlino fa vedere che ha un cranio abbastanza grande la mascella robusta puo uccidere anche t-rex poi non sono stati trovati ancora tutti i resti di questi percio non parlate
MUAIYAD 2 months ago
@MUAIYAD Yeah, I just translated what you said, and that is completely bullshit. Spino's jaws weren't capable of clamping down on T-Rex due to the fact its width, height, and thickness of the snout gives it only a 10,000 newton biteforce compared to T-Rex's 60,000 newton (translates to energy) biteforce.
Spino's only true defense is size, which is great to have but at the same time will always have its own flaws. Even to that, its hips were not pulled far apart, which T-Rex's hips were
MrTobyCure 2 months ago
@MUAIYAD pulled apart better, giving it that far wide stance. Spino was only perfectly suited for its environment and niche, that was why it wasn't so successful as the Tyrannosaurs who took from North America to Asia.
You shouldn't even try to win a debate against me. I will prove you wrong...
MrTobyCure 2 months ago
SPINO HAVE DNA CHUCK NORRIS AND DEFEATED THE T-REX
MUAIYAD 2 months ago
@MUAIYAD you guys have Chuck Norris in Italy?
MrTrent 2 months ago 3
@MrTrent chuck norris is everywhere
Nightvampirefear 1 month ago
SPINSAURUS HAVE ARM S AND LEGS SO IT REALLY CHUCK NORRIS SPINOSAURUS USE MARTIAL ARTS
BLAZIKEN90000000 2 weeks ago
@BLAZIKEN90000000 chuck norris gets eaten by a t-rex easily
Mechagodzilla34 1 week ago
@MUAIYAD (MrTrent EY COCK SUCKER THE SPINSAURUS WINT U PUZZY
BLAZIKEN90000000 2 weeks ago
Spino is bigger, stronger, and heavier, but T-rex is still the king, end of discussion.
teardropkiller400 2 months ago
@teardropkiller400 T-rex is stronger!
CHADE47lol 1 month ago
@CHADE47lol spinossaurus e mais bom
leandro62836 1 month ago
@CHADE47lol Trex is said to have had stronger teeth, but overall spino is stronger. for one thing it's bigger, and for another thing it has long, almost human-like arms, so even though trex is king, it is indeed true that sadly, spino is stronger :_(
teardropkiller400 4 weeks ago
@teardropkiller400 Size doesn't prove shit and Spinosaurus didn't have human-like arms its like saying that an Unarmed Human is stronger than a Chimpanzee.
CHADE47lol 4 weeks ago
@CHADE47lol Look, I can see your point, but you've gotta face the facts: regardless if spino's arms were human-like, they were still very long. If trex had somehow fallen down during a fight, It wouldn't have been able to get back up due to it's stubby arms, but a spino could have, since it's arms are long. I agree with you that trex is better and would win a fight, but spino is still stronger (but still wouldn't win). This argument is pointless.
teardropkiller400 3 weeks ago
@teardropkiller400 Actually if Spinosaurus fell down it won't get back up because its spine would be broken and T-rex is stronger.
CHADE47lol 3 weeks ago
@CHADE47lol Oh right, I forgot about the spine thing. So I guess falling down would be fatal for both of them. Now, I've done a lot of research on spino and trex, and it says that trex had longer and stronger teeth, but spino has more overall body strength. So I don't think the creators of this movie were innaccurate when they had spino kill trex, because maybe the teeth were just strong enough to hold trex's neck, and then snap it. But I still say trex wins 7 out of 10 times.
teardropkiller400 3 weeks ago
@TheDinocam I will agree with that, but they aren't a huge factor in a fight since the arms are directly under the body which would be great if it was a fish or a small dino. But considering this fight is between T-Rex and Spino, arms aren't an option for Spino to use.
MrTobyCure 2 months ago
@TheDinocam That is completely incorrect about the arms of a spinosaurus. I'm sure everyone else will argue about this too. But Spino's arms weren't muscularly built, which it couldn't swing its arms. Its arms were too slow and it couldn't even swing out infront of it due to its inability of having its arms dislocated. It would have to stand REALLY tall which indecently make it fall over on its back and break its spine which was connected to its vertebrae, snapping its back and die.
MrTobyCure 2 months ago
@MrTobyCure I will speak in Italian then translate e tutto sbagliato spino aveva braccia ben forti e facili da muovere per spellare il pesce poteva ben allungare la mano e uccidere t-rex qui lo uccide perche ha un DNA modificato quello chuck norris che lo rende il triplo piu forte percio stai zitto bambino leggi libri o vedi documentari prima di parlare
MUAIYAD 2 months ago
@MUAIYAD XD wtf?a
MrTobyCure 2 months ago
What if T-Rexes and Spinosaurs were actually very docile herbivores that enjoyed tea parties and ballroom dance? Wouldn't you all feel a little silly arguing who would win in a fight?
Luc88Cole 2 months ago 2
@HeavyMetalGames93 spinos skul is long and narrow i dug up a spino skull when i was 4.
mcreed1000 2 months ago
rexy should've won.
radinkaj 2 months ago
@HeavyMetalandGames93 gharials have jaws 1/3 of their body. See any 20 foot spino skulls? use other analogys.
animaljp3 2 months ago
@HeavyMetalandGames93 Crocs rip without serrations. the jaws were thicker and shorter than a gharial. Size does not matter, expecily when some are smaller
animaljp3 2 months ago
What bullshit. It's like a gharial beating an alligator. In reality, Tyrannosaurus > Spinosaurus.
wigglycock 2 months ago
@wigglycock spino had much thicker teeth, shorter and thicker skull than a gharial
animaljp3 2 months ago
Shut up and just watch the video for god sake your acting like children
memebutler 2 months ago
@HeavyMetalandGames93 you do not have any evidence bary could not kill an adult iguanodon
animaljp3 2 months ago
@HeavyMetalandGames93 the teeth are the same shape. Go to wikipedias real skull and you will see a huge tooth. Even baryonyx ate an iguanodon
animaljp3 2 months ago
@HeavyMetalandGames93 the teeth are the same shape. DID YOU EVEN LOOK AT THE PICTURE???? spino had a deeper skull than a croc. It could rip. even baryonyx could eat an igaunodon.
animaljp3 2 months ago
@HeavyMetalandGames93 teeth are big and round. no tooth in any animal for 600 million yaers was hollow. Think hugecroc teeth. look at real skull on wikipedia.
animaljp3 2 months ago
yo its just a fight made by a director to make the movie cool! not to start world war 3! so calm down
monsterboy868 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
look at the skull of spino on wikipedia thats real. the tooth is thick as half the length of the guy's finger in thickness. it is as long as the guys finger, and it was broken.
animaljp3 3 months ago
@HeavyMetalandGames93 no, they are thicker and shorter than gharials in relative sense.
animaljp3 3 months ago
@HeavyMetalandGames93 think of crocodiles. piscivrous does not mean weak.
animaljp3 3 months ago
It had nile crocodile shaped teeth and 6 foot arms to hold while teeth ripped.
animaljp3 3 months ago
@animaljp3 The arms were weak
Creaturelover18 3 months ago
@HeavyMetalandGames93 no, i said EAT each other. Spinosauruses size, not just length would make it as strong as at rex. the muscles were just stretched out it. was at least 10 feet longer and 5 feet taller.
animaljp3 3 months ago
@HeavyMetalandGames93 top preditors do not eat other top predators because they could not get enough energy. though weak for its size, the size probaly made it as strong as a t rex. the length of bones would make up for thickness
animaljp3 3 months ago
KRSsven has a good point, I think it's important to remember that the fossils found is the only story teller. It was less than ten years ago when Rex lost it's crown as the biggest carnivore because they discovered a bigger fossil, not a bigger species. With that said I think spino might have been bigger on average, but was it more ferocious?
exploder43 3 months ago
Unfortunately, T. rex has become cemented in our minds as the most iconic dinosaur. This leads to the clear bias you see below. All of the scientific evidence shows that Spinosaurs routinely grew to a far larger size than tyrannosaurs (bigger than in JP3) and were probably around twice as heavy. That's before you consider the display advantage a spino gets from the sail. In the end, it's JP that made people really love the rex, and JP that changed that perception.
KRSsven 3 months ago
@KRSsven Spinosaurus had hallow teeth, which is why it mainly ate smaller prey like fish. If it tried to bite a T-rex it would damage its teeth.
themixedarts 3 months ago
@themixedarts See further below. Their teeth continually regenerated in exactly the way crocodile teeth do today. Biting a rex wouldn't produce a wound as bad as rex teeth would, but it wouldn't damage its teeth any more than crocs do when they attack animals. Even crocodiles and alligators do not solely eat fish; the Spinosaurs would've had greater variety in their diet thanks to their greater mobility. Like most predators it would've eaten anything it could take, even another theropod's kill.
KRSsven 3 months ago
Comment removed
UltimateArmySoldier 3 months ago
@HeavyMetalandGames93 i disagree but im not going to fight about it, at least your just stating your opinion rather than simply saying the t rex should have won without actual evidence. by the way (dont flag for spam) i think you should watch planet dinosaur: the lost world if you havent already, amazing series
baa55555a 3 months ago
@HeavyMetalandGames93 And does that make them Natural Predators of each other? NO. They Obviously dont attack one another consistently to eat. Territory and mating are not means for food, but they still may eat their contender if it is killed. Doesn't make it a Natural predator. And a T-rex would rather hunt a young Tricera bc their weaker, but if it had to get a older one, they try to get it alone. Obviously prey arent just gonna sit back and let themselvs get eaten, which is y they stay 2gethr
blublast3 3 months ago 2
@HeavyMetalandGames93 Omg for dear sakes i meant that COMPARED TO OTHER PREY, spinosaurus had a better chance of hurting a Charchar than say idk a duckbilled dinosaur that lived in Africa. Why don't you think big predators dont attack other big predators, because they could hurt themselves and although they may win, it's at the risk of being unable to hunt for your next meal. Spino could inflict enough harm to do that to a Charchar, which is why they avoided each other.
blublast3 3 months ago
@HeavyMetalandGames93 First off, lets get this through, Spino HAD NO NATURAL PREDATORS ONCE SO EVER. Dinosaurs don't attack dinosaurs that have a better chance at harming them. Ok, now.. If Spino moved away from the coast for dry seasons, then most of it's diet WOULDN'T be fish, it would have been built to also be able to tackle larger dinosaurs, Spino required tons of meat, it actually ate so much, fish was plentiful and spino could be wasteful. Dinosaurs scavenged thru Spino's leftover fish.
blublast3 3 months ago
@HeavyMetalandGames93 That is a stupid question, of course it didn't have natural predators. That's like asking if Hyenas have natural predators. Lions dont just go around hunting other carnivores which could lead to a battle which could IN FACT bring harm to themselves and injure them so they can't hunt. Charchar had weak jaws, just sharp teeth, and could not in fact tackle large prey, it bit the animal, then waited for it to bleed out before finishing it off. Spino stayed near the coast.
blublast3 3 months ago
@HeavyMetalandGames93 Again, as i said before, it's not a NATURAL PREDATOR. THEY WERE NEVER SUPPOSED TO INTERACT ONCE SO EVER. The only reason they DID was due to the fact that DROUGHTS occurred in Northern Africa and SPINOSAURUS had to move INLAND, where it was forced to COMPETE with CARCHARODONTOSAURUS. FORCED SO IT COULD TRY TO SURVIVE. STILL, Carchar may have been intimidated by Spino and after a few bites back and forth, occasionally given up a meal or two, BUT evntualy Spino went extinct.
blublast3 3 months ago
@HeavyMetalandGames93 Obviously it has no natural predators when it's full grown, kinda obvious? If you thought i meant as a baby, realize that all baby dinosaurs had predators.
blublast3 3 months ago
@HeavyMetalandGames93 did i say it wasn't. Darn it man read. Your first comment said Spino was large for defense, but why would it look defensive if it had no natural predators -_- The evidence you were talking about showed Carchar in fact didn't prey on Spino, but moreover fought against it over carcasses. The broken spines show conflict, not being eaten. Actually, spino probably won a few carcass battles, just not enough to survive as a species.
blublast3 3 months ago
@HeavyMetalandGames93 Wrong, they initially had no conflicts once so ever, one owned the land, one the water. It's only when droughts kicked in that spino was forced to hit the land and was forced to attack Carchar due to it's food supply being gone. They fought over carcasses of dead dinosaurs. So in summary, spinosaurus wasn't built to look defensive, because it had no enemies to begin with
blublast3 3 months ago
i think in reality a spino would have been no match whatsoever for a t rex.T rex was heavier,had a much greater bite force,was smarter,probably quicker and more agile.had they met, i think any fight they might have had would have been over quickly.i believe a t rex would have beaten carcharodontasaurus as well,for exactly the same reasons.It was a later model,the end time dino evolution killer.
jxxxjppp 4 months ago
@jxxxjppp T. rex only weighed around six tons (its weight was very recently revised downward). The lower estimates for s. aegypticus are around 10-11 tons, so truly large specimens were probably twice as heavy as a rex. Nobody knows anything about dinosaur intelligence, it's all speculation. Lastly, evolution does not work the way pop culture thinks it does. Later does not equal better.
KRSsven 3 months ago
...
Quierotooo 4 months ago
you just reapeated that part were trex bites spino so it would look like he won, when spino really won which is 100 % true and who ever rights back against me i wont listen because trex lost and thats it alright.
godzilla9567 4 months ago
@godzilla9567 omg...is it really that obvious that I used footage from the real fight for my fake fight? Back to the drawing board!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
MrTrent 4 months ago 3
@MrTrent crap, you idea sounds amazing actually, very creative =)
MaadDawg1 4 months ago
@godzilla9567 Well I think it's just a movie and these two carnivores did not live at the same time. Really have no idea who'd win but seeing as the spinosaurus was much larger than the t-rex and had functioning arms it is most likeliest to win. But I still see the T-Rex as king of the dinosaurs.
TEBellant 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@godzilla9567 the Spino's teeth were for spearing fish thats why it has a long snout for catching fish so It can breathe while cathcing fish, ware the Trex has bone crushing teeth and jaw just like the hyeena. One bite from a Trex would do alot more damage then the spino's and even if by some magic from god himself the spino won the battle it would die shortly after from the gravous wounds it would have gotten but that wouldn't make for a good movie
BluePit864 3 months ago
@godzilla9567 Spino's brain was smaller than T-Rex's, therefore it wouldn't have been smart enough to kill T-Rex like that, instinct or not. Besides, there's a reason why the T-Rex was known as the "Tyrant King"
UltimateArmySoldier 3 months ago
@godzilla9567 Get off youtube. No one gives a shit about your opinions.
RAOliverDude 3 months ago
@godzilla9567 I'd like to point out that the result of the Spinosaur beating the Tyrannosaur was based only off of Jack Horner's advising. Jack is an advocate of the theory that the Tyrannosaur was a scavenger, despite never having published a scientific paper on it, and the evidence to the contrary (the Tyrannosaur's stereoscopic advanced vision). It is more widely accepted that the Tyrannosaur both hunted and scavenged. Jack used his conclusion to state that the T. Rex would lose.
EXCESSENTERTAINMENT 2 months ago
@EXCESSENTERTAINMENT i would like to piont out you have no evidence for the battle.
animaljp3 2 months ago
@godzilla9567 While in actuality, the Tyrannosaur would have likely have won, as his predatory instinct as well as 30 million years of evolution were on his side. As well, the Spinosaur was much more likely to consume fish and likely would be much less adept at hunting on land than the Tyrannosaur. Bigger, yes. Better? No.
EXCESSENTERTAINMENT 2 months ago
@EXCESSENTERTAINMENT evolution means NOTHING. it is ADAPTION not bettering
animaljp3 2 months ago
I think this scene should've ended the film, with the T-Rex killing the Spino like in JP1.
Hermes7282 4 months ago
the trex is the king dont mess with the king trex sould have won i mean this is dumb spino could not hurt him
benjipokemon 4 months ago
this is why i hate jurassic park now. i used to love it but because they put this fight scene in i'm pissed. the spino was built for hunting fish with sharp teeth to puncture the fist to kill it. the T-rex was built to rip huge chunks of meat out of its prey. they've shown that T-rex had one of the strongest bites ever and that a bite to the neck like that would of crushed the spino's wind pipe or broken the neck. there's no way in hell the spino should of won.
captinpokerface42 4 months ago
this is the most fucking retarded ass fight i have ever seen. sorry but this is gay.
kablabrules 4 months ago
@kablabrules No! You're gay! So there! =P
MrTrent 4 months ago 3
@MrTrent hes not gay youre gay so is the fight
godzilla9567 4 months ago
@godzilla9567 You used the same word twice in one sentence. You bore me.
MrTrent 4 months ago
@godzilla9567 Nothing wrong with homosexuality. Perhaps you yourself will become gay when no girl will want to put out for you.
RAOliverDude 3 months ago
@kablabrules calm the fuck down. Jesus christ. Please go ahead and do better if you can.
RAOliverDude 3 months ago
que falso la mordida del t.rex lo hubiera matado
jmcjb13 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Crocodile teeth continually regenerate, the new tooth grows inside the old so when the tooth falls out, the new one is immediately ready. So we know that Spinosaurus not only had a similarly shaped skull to a crocodile, but had very similar dentition to them as well. Croc jaws are designed for biting and holding rather than crushing, but they have immensely powerful jaws. So spinos very likely had a crocodile-style bite, very powerful but designed to trap rather than crush or slice.
KRSsven 5 months ago
I don't think anybody would say a crocodilian has a weak bite, yet these animals are primarily piscivores. It's likely Spinosaurus had a powerful bite in proportion to its size, just like a crocodile. In modern animals, the combatants use display, size and aggression to drive each other away. We already know the Spino was bigger, possibly even more so than in the film. The rex may well have backed down, especially since they weren't fighting over a kill.
KRSsven 5 months ago
This evidence suggests S. aegypticus was far bigger in sheer size and weight than T. rex, which had the better weaponry in its jaws. They were quite capable of killing each other: a large rex of 6 tons or so has a crushing bite, but a large spino of around 15 tons has more than twice the weight. So the current evidence shows that Spinos were not 'defensive' and were quite capable of fighting other, smaller theropods. I like how 'lightly built' is defined as 10 tons, heavier than T. rex ever got.
KRSsven 5 months ago
Fossil evidence suggests that both theropods were the apex predators of their environment. It shows that T. rex (based on muscle reconstruction) had an immense bite force (some scientists revise the big figures to around 24 kN as a realistic estimate), whereas Spinosaurs had a (relatively) weaker bite. The key evidence is the current size estimates - it's though that T. rex was up to 12.8m long and 6.8 tons. S. aegypticus' upper limits were 18m long and 20.9 tons. Spino has the advantage there!
KRSsven 5 months ago
@KRSsven I don't know how long 18 meters is, but I know 20 tons is very ridiculous for a predator when you have big animals that aren't even over forty feet long and they still weigh 6 to 7 tons. Let's get some facts straight here though. Spino's build would not let it be that heavy, due to the fact it was not completely based on muscles. In my opinion, it at least eight 9 to 11 tons at least, which is truly heavy. Its body design too wouldn't allow it to get that heavy. Unless it was as fat
MrTobyCure 3 months ago
T-rex and Spinosaurus. Spinosaurus would never have won, partly because it was a fish eate and its teeth weren't designed to slice, rather grip, but mainly because Spinosaurus died out roughly 95 million years ago, whereas T-Rex soldiered on until the end. Oh and T-Rex evolved after Spino's were dead
BMWM3GTRLOVER 5 months ago
which brand of microwave did you record this with?
rockfreak611 5 months ago
I agree that the evidence strongly suggests that T. rex actively hunted Triceratops, the partially-healed bone injuries are quite clear. Spinosaurus is likely to have been a terrestrial predator with a fishing bias (this is currently accepted by the scientific community). We don't know whether it could've tackled a big ceratopsian, but the known facts suggest it wouldn't have fared as well. Tyrannosaurs and Ceratopsians were locked in an arms race - Triceratops would be a tough kill.
KRSsven 5 months ago
@KRSsven Well truth is, all factual evidence clearly shows spino was a specialist on fishing but very bias on land. You can even see it, long narrow neck and snout equipped with weak jaws and hollowed weak spearing teeth positioned just for fish and high up nostrils. Its sail also made it more adaptable in water while very stiffen, non agile, not swift and much slower on land then what it would be without it. Because of spino's major disadvantages such as its delicate sail, it was too frightful
condemned6436 5 months ago
@condemned6436 In the paleontological community it is accepted (for the moment) that Spinosaurus was a terrestrial predator that had adapted to a particular niche. Its bite may have been weaker than that of a Tyrannosaur, but it was still capable of hunting and killing fast-moving prey, which it would've had to do in dry seasons. In the fight they filmed the rex gets the first bite in on its neck, which would've probably resulted in a mortal wound. The Spino was still capable of killing one.
KRSsven 5 months ago
@KRSsven T-rex actually had the perfect spot to sever and distroy important arteries, vessels and the actual vertebraes and with 12in steak knife sharp railroad spikes enforced by steel smashing jaws would guarantee it. In 2008, even though they had more then enough evidence to prove spino was a primary fish eater before, it was then when it finally declared and labeled as a piscivore due to overlapping factual evidence.
condemned6436 5 months ago
@condemned6436 Yes, I already pointed out that in the fight as filmed, the bite from the rex would've caused serious injury if the correct purchase was found. I think it's assumed that 'piscivore' means that a species eats only fish, which is untrue. Crocodiles are primarily piscivores but take whatever they can. Spinosaurus needed to be able to hunt other, larger prey than fish due to dry seasons. It's already known that its environment was prone to seasonal changes like the Nile of today.
KRSsven 5 months ago
Comment removed
condemned6436 5 months ago
@condemned6436 It does. It has virtually identical jaw structure to a gharial, which are the second-largest crocodile species. It needed teeth and jaws strong enough to lift the giant sawfish Dalpiazia stromeri which was even larger than today's sawfish that can grow to over 20 ft. So it had strong jaws and a strong bite, but when compared with T. rex obviously its jaws are weaker. It could go up against Carcharodontosaurs, at least as big as a rex, which is known thanks to healed bite wounds.
KRSsven 5 months ago
@KRSsven They jaws are only identical at first glance but spino actually has a delicate fragile skull with small jaws and hollowed teeth. Spino can hunt 15-20ft fish but not because it had strong jaws but if it's quick enough, it can take it out using it spearing teeth and neck to pull it out and immediately drop it on land, probable wont break its teeth, or at least not a lot of them(all fish are completely defenseless if grabbed by the sides). This technique wont work on land basted prey.
condemned6436 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@condemned6436 They haven't found enough skull remains to calculate its skull tolerances, which were very likely similar to a crocodiles since they occupy a very similar niche (it shared the habitat with giant crocs like Stomatosuchus). The sawfish we know it fed on were much bigger than modern ones, which can reach ~23 ft. By hollowed teeth you're actually referring to dendition that crocodilians have, where the new teeth grow inside the old, continually regenerating.
KRSsven 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@KRSsven There are actually major difference between crocs and spino such as body design, structure, etc and spino doesn't have the jaw designs of a croc, its delicate jaws are too narrow while being overly elongated and equipped with weak hollowed teeth and had relatively small jaws that couldn't possible withstand it. Spino is really a primary piscivore but mainly hunted smaller dinos if not scavenge from carch.
condemned6436 5 months ago
@condemned6436 as a sauropod and wide as it, WHICH IT WASN'T.
MrTobyCure 3 months ago
@MrTobyCure I didn't say it was as large as a sauropod just as smart as one, although I have to admit that's perhaps pushing that expected intellect a bit too high though for a primitive spino...
condemned6436 3 months ago
@condemned6436 I think that is considerably low for a predator. All predators are smarter than their prey, so I would think Spino would be smarter than a sauropod, but by very little. For predators, all you need to do is be as smart or smarter than your prey.
MrTobyCure 3 months ago
@MrTobyCure Spino did not hunt sauropods, in fact it was clearly unable to barely catch medium sized prey. Weak jaws, long stiffening sail that logically made it a very cautious and frightful animal, lacking physical strength and musculature, the least agile of all theropods in general, too slow, arms being too inflexible and not very effective, etc(proven false).It has been strongly proven to mainly hunt fish, you don't need a lot of intellect to fish. Let alone spino's brain is extremely small
condemned6436 3 months ago
Actually the upper estimate for S. aegypticus is 20.9 tons. Though there is evidence they fought with Carcharodontosaurs, there is no way Spinosaurus was a prey animal for it. They would've clashed over hunting areas or individual kills. Hunting another predator is going to take far too much energy and carries too much risk, espcially if it is bigger (they're never found a bigger predator than Spinosaurus).
KRSsven 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Alot of arguments over this movie.
AJrage100 5 months ago
lolz i started debate xDDD
TheHeynear 5 months ago
look it up its true
Mrtoshirohitsugaya10 5 months ago
guys spino cant win battle between rex....
spino teeth is specialized for eating fishes (like croc has) and rexs are fat and long.
Spino is lighter and rex is heavier so its almost impossible to knock rex on the floor. :D
TheHeynear 5 months ago
@TheHeynear Of course Spino could win, how couldn't he? First of all, I'll agree with you that T-rex is heavier, but he is so heavy that he's got PERFECT balance (hence the small arms to even himself out) so if he gets off balance just a bit, he'd fall and couldn't get up. Second, Spino isn't just a fisherman, he was also specialized for hunting giants like sauropods, large crocs, and other theropods. And third, dude, look at his claws. They're meant for shredding flesh off of bone.
JurtMushku 5 months ago
@JurtMushku hahaha are you fucking kiding me? That is total bull shit! spinosaurus wasnt remotely designed for killing theropods OR sauropods! he was designed for smaller, easier prey. why? those jaws were weak and narrow, becoming a perfect example of biting off more than you can chew. it's jaws would have broke in half under all of the thrashing t.rex would have done while he was trying to escape. and dont get me started on those claws.they couldnt have even grasped t.rex! they wernt designed
Rocketdream7 5 months ago
@JurtMushku to go past a 30 degree angle! They were meant for grabbing on to smaller, more insignificant animals. how do i know this? look at acrocanthosaurus. massive carnivore in north america. it had the most powerful arms of any animal of it's time. they only had one flaw, as do all other animals with arms like it. Since their bodies were bent over and in an aquard angle, it was impossible for them to bring the arms up farther than to scratch its own chin. A.K.A: little under 30 degrees.
Rocketdream7 5 months ago
@JurtMushku now, t.rex has the most powerful bite of any animal to ever live, surpassing that of even megoladon. Once t.rex had his jaws over spinos neck, the battle is over. Nothing on earth can escape those jaws. over 1000 pounds per square inch. it would have broke spinos neck before spino even had time to figure out whats going on. It is pure fact. T.rex has the weight, the power, the speed, and the experience of fighting other large, more agressive animals over spinosaurus. for instance,
Rocketdream7 5 months ago
@JurtMushku take tricerotpos into example. It was a truly lethal animal, with 3-6 foot horns on its frill and a beak full of mollars that could snap bone with ease. it would charge and kill any animal that posed a threat to it's wellbeing. the only animals that dared to challenge them are either other tricerotops or t.rex. tyrannosaurus used it's teeth, being the size of a banana and as sharp as razors, to snap the horns and kill tricerotops. it it were spino, it would have died in seconds. fact
Rocketdream7 5 months ago
@JurtMushku tricerotops. a truly lethal creature. t.rex would activly hunt and kill tricerotops on a daily basis. spinosaurus wouldnt last 5 seconds with tricerotops. in te end, rex fought way more aggresive and dangerous animals than spinosaurus. spinosaurus had less experience with othe lethal animals. t.rex would have won in the end, and that is final. that is fact. if you dont believe me, hundereds if not thousands, maybe even millions of people will.
Rocketdream7 5 months ago
@Rocketdream7 Sigh, I've been arguing with people about this ALL DAY the last two days on multiple videos, and what I've really learned is that IT'S JUST A MOVIE!!! These two creatures were both fearsome & powerful but the NEVER lived together and would've never actually done this. This was for a sci-fi movie, so there is absolutely no reason to continue this Rex vs Spino debate. By the way, how would you KNOW what T-rex did on a daily basis? They're extinct! You can guess but you won't know.
JurtMushku 5 months ago
@JurtMushku true, and your right. how DO i know. i dont know. but, there is enough proof that i can say t.rex activily hunted and killed them. the fact is in the bones of both t.rex and tric. tooth marks and horn punctures are scatered all over eachothers remains. i can make a hypothosis that t.rex hunted tricerotops. end of descussion. all i wanted to do is INFORM you that your statement was incorrect, and that spino couldnt have won. but, you are right, this would NEVER have happened.
Rocketdream7 5 months ago
A long, slender snout = not so much bite force. The T-Rex clearly has the advantage when it comes to strength of the bite.
PWNAGEpb 5 months ago
crysisman09 yo trex was the smartest of all dino man ..spino had the brain of a croc or even less
Tobius11 5 months ago
@Tobius11 WRONG SIR! Raptors (every kind) were most likely the smartest. Rex probably only had two thoughts, "Food, food, food, food!" and "I gotta go pee."
JurtMushku 5 months ago
why so many T-rex fans? the spinosaurus are the most cool of them and the biggest just because its has bigger teeths and much stronger bites the spino can still win if it gets the neck of a t-rex with the mouth and use his hands to break it. Remember this Spino is still the most intelligent of those two and bigger and faster. If spinosaurus where living the same time as t-rex he would defenitely win in real life but he lived longer time ago and lived by fish he would win if he was a meat eater!
crysisman09 5 months ago
you cant spell idiot you mean not everyone saw the movie well i did and the t-rex never one he LOST!!!
renwarsuper 5 months ago
@renwarsuper And you don't know what punctuation is.
MrTrent 5 months ago
@renwarsuper It;'s won not one
FEAROWNAGE 5 months ago
this is fake sinosaurus win
333rapero 5 months ago
@333rapero wow you really saw through my clever ruse? i almost had everyone fooled
MrTrent 5 months ago 3
@MrTrent je je does not fool anyone all saw the movie
333rapero 5 months ago
@333rapero ...
MrTrent 4 months ago
@333rapero pfft fuck spinosaurus. if i wanted to, i could give you a page on how t.rex would have won and what t.rex had on spino that made him the clear victor.
Rocketdream7 5 months ago
so... t.rex kills himself?.
Rocketdream7 5 months ago
el espinosaurio es ms grande y fuerte por eso gano
333rapero 5 months ago
they do exist have you ever did research on them cause i did for school
Mrtoshirohitsugaya10 5 months ago
ha EPIC FAIL Spinosaurus
1233Viper 5 months ago
OKAY. Why the fuck would a T-Rex leave a gaint, fresh meal to derp around chasing things that aren't even as big as one of its claws. No predator would do that. LOL LOGIC IS NOT THERE.
WinglessFlutters 6 months ago
@WinglessFlutters Because no predator can resist a moving target. Fact.
IFMIStupidFox 6 months ago
@IFMIStupidFox Yeah, maybe for five seconds. But you wouldn't see a lion completely leave a kill to derp around chasing a bird. The length and effort put into this chase = no logic. Fact.
WinglessFlutters 6 months ago
@WinglessFlutters It's a film. Fact.
IFMIStupidFox 6 months ago
@IFMIStupidFox You're a troll. Fact.
WinglessFlutters 6 months ago
@WinglessFlutters Okay.
IFMIStupidFox 6 months ago
if only you knew how arrogant you t-rex fans are >.> spino is real btw SDCDIABLO lol and it WAS built stronger then t-rex... for it had to compete with carcharodontasaurus which.. is bigger then t-rex and t-rex only had to compete with like... raptors? PLEASE RESEARCH YOUR FACTS BEFORE YOU COME TO CONCLUSIONS
mrtowelie2 6 months ago in playlist horses
@mrtowelie2 That's incorrect. What you said about Spino being stronger is just bullshit. T-Rex has much more better features than Spino due to evolution being on T-Rex's side. Spino is much more primitive and cannot battle against such a hypercarnivore like T-Rex. T-Rex's biteforce would be the ultimate factor in winning the fight against Spino. T-Rex is just too powerful for Spino to handle.
MrTobyCure 5 months ago
@MrTobyCure Exactly! Plus, Spino wouldn't exactly be much of a competition against Carchar, since to our present knowledge it was a fisheater mainly, while Carchar was strictly a land predator - they both controlled their own areas, which makes perfect sense!
And T-Rex bite was the strongest of all land animals - that IS a fact and it could kill an animal heavier than itself (Triceratops for example, it was heavier than T-Rex) in one successful charge!
ak150884 5 months ago
people stop trying to save t-rex >.< in the movie the spino was actually smaller then it really is... its JUST as strong in bite force but it has many things t-rex dont... USABLE ARMS for one it weighs more and its longer it EASILY can beat t-rex dont try to hard to prove me WRONG cuz u cant.. its pretty obvious if u know facts.
mrtowelie2 6 months ago
The first T-Rex fossils were found in Montana...so T-REX!!! FUCK YEAH!!! AMERICA!!! FUCK YEAH!!! PROSE AND PROSE POETRY!!! FUuuu....what???
MrFutureTrillionaire 6 months ago
the only thing i liked of this video is the last image
096giovadale 6 months ago
my favorite dino is spinosaurus but ....... the true is ........ T-Rex .... i think.... welll.. t-rex is better but still.. spino is my favoriteeeeee
naruto1999sakura 6 months ago
Trex is King Spino is his bitch. Nuff said.
varone6t9 6 months ago
@Anime1080pHD no, in the movie it said it was a bull (male)
Volker5141 6 months ago
its nt tht the spino was stronger the trex slipped up n gt his neck broken everyone says the movie sucked becuz the trex lost, hyenas kill lions becuz they slip up n i kno hyenas are nt stronger thn lions lol same thing so stop commentin on every jp3 video wit the trex losin to the spinosaurus sayn its stupid becuz of tht get over urself its a good movie
ryanwilliams311 6 months ago
am i the only one who like sinposaurus more than t rex
TheShady50 6 months ago
Thumbs up for t-rex
BadAssMacmillan 6 months ago
T Rex suck i love Spinosaurus cause they are so much cooler they are built to be stronger that t Rex
Mrtoshirohitsugaya10 6 months ago
@Mrtoshirohitsugaya10 They arn't a real thing, that "spinosaurus" in the movie was some wierd morbid mix of like 5 different dinos. It was also too small or the T-Rex was too big
SDCDIABLO 6 months ago
@SDCDIABLO
spinosaurus is a real dino ive done enough research to know
Mrtoshirohitsugaya10 6 months ago
@Mrtoshirohitsugaya10 Well ya obviously theres like 4 different species, but I ment the wierd random non existant mind creation thats depicted in the movie isn't a real thing, all they did was make like a super t rex mixed with like an alligator. The movies spinosaurus was such a fucking fake joke, it wasn't related to any dinosaur at all, just pure fictionalized!
SDCDIABLO