Added: 3 years ago
From: stelioshajiioannou
Views: 322,583
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (2,177)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • What these ladies are witnesses to is exactly what must happen due to the different speeds of sound in different mediums. The speed of sound is 17 faster in ground, steel and concrete than it is in air. These ladies HAD to notice the airplane's and explosion from their feet before they would hear it.  If there was an explosion in the lower levels, they STILL would have heard the planes impact and the impact felt from their feet beforehand. This is scientific FACT, people.

  • The truth is we don't know what those loud booming sounds where. But there are many who make the assumption that they were explosives. Not because they have a logical reason to do so but because it fits with their other assumptions reguarding the style of the collapse. THose sounds could be any number of things from large chunks of debris slamming into the ground to an elevator crashing into the bottom of it's shaft. But they are satisfied with their first assumption and so they dig no deeper.

  • @MrAwsome514 What about the ones before anything fell? Tranformers again? Lol. Don't bother answering back with a deuche answer.

  • @Fred420ist What do you mean before anything fell... The moment those planes hit tons of shit fell and continued to fall untill the towers finally collapsed. Now unless you can find some evidence of one happening before the planes even fucking hit you can jsut suck it. Oh and I mean real evidence not just some homeless dude in a tinfoil hat spouting off about stealth bombers made of jelly beans being what actually did it.

  • This is all about making assumptions. Anytime a loud and sudden booming noise is heard the first thing that comes to mind for most people is an explosion. But what if we added a low rumbling noise after it? Well now the immediate assumption is that it was just thunder. How about we add the sound of grinding gears after it? Well now it is a truck backfireing. Or at least that is the assumption we would come to.

  • OMG!!Women with her face blown off...did that women have a family..if she did may her family find ease and comfort and may she rest in peace

  • Um, is this footage of the first WTC bombing? From the 90's?

  • that's that phrase I'm looking for? Oh yeah...inside freakin job

  • why does a country protect a war criminal who used torture and planned and executed an attack on its own people not care?why spend years and countless $ investigating monica L but nothing into 911?i guess lying about sex is worse than killing thousands of your own people.

  • bush is a fucking sick twisted bitch man... sick

  • america is dangerous man > who gonna atack next :)., sorr 4 bad eng.

  • Since the speed of sound is faster in steel and concrete than it is in air, what these ladies are saying is exactly what must happen due to the physics involved. Truthers need to get out of their mom's basements and get a decent education so they learn simple physics like this.

  • @lijebaley01 the speed of sound is FASTER when traveling through solid objects? that's odd

  • @lijebaley01 your right and sound can burn things too.

  • @lijebaley01 i dont believe u when u say that u first hear the sound of explotions before a plain or bomb shall crash into an object? No if thats physics i dont want to waist my time on that bullshit. I live in Holland and i hear often plains, (F16:)first they are gone and then i hear sound. Regular plain, i hear noise and then i see it. But never also not with firework first sound and afterwards an explotion. no

  • F16s move faster than the speed of sound, in case you didnt know..

  • @dienaarvanYahuah, I'll try to explain it a little better. The plane hits.  The sound waves from the steel, concrete and the ground travels faster than the sound waves that travel through the air. It is a physical fact, and only takes a minute to confirm.

  • @lijebaley01 molten steel, put options, missing plane at pentagon, missing plane in shanksville, the 'nose out' shot, nanothermite, NORAD standdown, PNACs 'we need a new pearl harbor', wtc7, fireproof passports, theres 10, of 70, explain them, or i just keep asking, stupid paid cointelpro shill

  • @wellifthemediasaysit Molten Steel? show me. Put options? Difference from norm is statistically insignificant. Nose in, nose out? just vague pixels. 95% of the plane in shanksville was recovered. NORAD Stand down? Shooting down of a civilian plane is outlaw by UN agreement signed by US and most other countries. PNAC? A ridiculous leap in truther logic. WTC7? explained completely by those that understand the NIST reports. you have nothing.

  • @lijebaley01 please explain away the 70 plus impossibilities, or i just keep asking, you truly suck at disinfo, we all know about cointelpro, 9/11 was still an inside job

  • @wellifthemediasaysit Let's take it one point at a time. First is your 'molten steel'. What exactly is your proof of molten steel? The plane's aluminum cascading out the side of WTC2 that has the same color and melts at normal office fire temperatures as the aluminum ALLOY use in planes? Or perhaps you think, as shown in the Harrit paper of lies, that iron spheroids create by exposing spalled steel to a 6000F mini oxyacetylene torch is proof?

  • @lijebaley01 Or perhaps you are referring to a photo showing a claw grabbing what truthers think must be a liquid. Maybe you are referring to a scan of perhaps 35% iron from spheres found in the WTC dust, as if its melting point would be anywhere close to pure iron as presented in the harrit lies paper? Or perhaps you are referring to a reporter addressing the possibility of finding survivors days after in the rubble which she says would be remote due to the molten metal?

  • @lijebaley01 numerous firemen and first responders saw the molten steel as well as NASA thermal hotspots, this is all very well known and those vids are here on youtube, and google, half the world has seen them, were those firemen lying??? 'structural steel, molten on end, would hit the air and just burst into flames'...thats very specific!!! were they lying???

  • @wellifthemediasaysit  The first responders in the videos we have seen are not experts in metalurgy, and would have no idea what they are seeing. NASA thermal hot spots are indicative of fires under the rubble. In no way does it imply molten metal. You where do you see molten steel bursting into flames when exposed to air? All I have seen are red hot combustibles bursting into flames when exposed to oxygen, certainly not molten metal.

  • @lijebaley01 please tell all those firemen they are lying/wrong/mistaken!!! they see structural steel girders, molten one on end, bursting into flames when they hit the air, but their eyes lie to them, as it doesnt fit the official lie that you are paid to peddle by cointelpro for a few bucks an hour..'structural steel, molten on one end'.....you truly truly suck at disinfo, i doubt if you are qualified enough to toss burgers!!! people will look all this up for themselves son, here on youtube!!!

  • @wellifthemediasaysit Please tell me who saw red hot metal spontaneously combust when exposed to air. You morons first say the metal conducts the heat away too fast so the metal can't weaken enough, and now you say metal can be cool on one side of the beam, and dripping iron on the other. Morons

  • @lijebaley01 please check on youtube or google, stupid paid cointelpro shill, you can pretend all you want son, but others who read this will simple google it, and think, what the fuck are (you) talking about, all those viewers (2million)? who have viewed those vids, and you sit there, hiding behind a pc and pretend you have no idea???really shill? cointelpro only get what they pay for i guess!!

  • @wellifthemediasaysit Anyone can also see for themselves your inability to support what you say. Post a video where they say they see metal bursting into flames when exposed to air. All I ever see is photos where debris starts burning when exposed to oxygen. Only truther scum makes the leap of faith where the debris transmorgifies into steel.

  • @lijebaley01 so those firemen and all those first responders were 'lying' right??? jeeez son, we all know about coitelpro, ppl will simpy do a quick google or youtube search and see all those vids, pls keep the BS more realistic in future, thanks..

  • @wellifthemediasaysit If any had said they saw, as you claim, that metal burst into flames when being extracted, I would not say they were lying, but that their explanation is physically impossible. I have never even hinted that any first responder or witness was lying.

  • @lijebaley01 so those firemen/first responders were telling the truth you say!! excellent, theres a start!! now why was the molten steel there??? was it caused by jet fuel? fire? was it a volcano??

  • @wellifthemediasaysit Show me where anyone saw molten steel, and who said they saw molten steel burst into flames as it was pulled out from the debris pile. They are manifestations only in the truther mind.

  • @lijebaley01 research it shilltard, its here on youtube, we all know 9/11 was an isnide job, asking for proof time and again only reveals you as the pathetic paid cointelpro shill that you are, desperately clinging to one impossibility when there are at least 70!!!

  • @wellifthemediasaysit Research it? The only research that I have come up with are the same truther lies. Show me one that isn't.

  • @lijebaley01 explain away the 70 plus impossibilities on 9.11!! im still waiting!! cointelpro only get what they pay for i guess!!

  • @wellifthemediasaysit Bring one up, and I will show you how it is a misquote, lie, faulty logic or not relevant. I have done so to everything you have bought up so far.

  • @lijebaley01 molten steel!! were all those firemen lying/taken out of context/or was there a volcano down there? also bush claiming to have seen the 1st drone hit WTC live??? so someone beamed amateur fireman footage to a TV in a school (that wasnt even there)? and another, ppl who heard WTC basement blow up before the first drone hit??? were they lying??? are they wrong (they were there) and are you right (you hide behind a pc attacking anyone who questions the official lie! theres 3 shill!!..

  • @wellifthemediasaysit Moron, these witnesses explain that they think the lobby exploded before the plane hit. They don't know the speed of sound is faster in steel/concrete than it is in the air and what they witnessed is exactly what must be experienced due to physical laws. They are not lying. The drone part IS a lie, people were in those craft you scumbag.

  • @lijebaley01 so you cant explain away 3 simple impossibilities i asked you???? why am i not suprised?? cointelpro only get what they pay for i guess!! i have 70 impossibilities and u cant even explain away 3??? you just run and hide, like all the paid shills/trolls/disinfo (STDs) answer my questions or i just keep asking them, stupid paid cointelpro troll!!

  • @wellifthemediasaysit Really? I broke down so many of your 70, and you were not able to substantiate any of those claims. I am patient so I ask for the 4th time... Bring one up and I will show you it is a lie, a misquote, immaterial or the result of faulty logic.

  • i didnt see faces turn in confusion. i see a lady saying what she believes happened and people looking around because they have eyeballs attached to their heads and thats what people do

  • "bomb hit the lobby first" *four faces turn in confusion*

  • @wizenhiemr cos she got her lines wrong....

  • @lumpfish99 lol, that would be nuts. A conspiracy WITHIN a conspiracy. Far out, man.

  • Doesnt anyone find it interesting that they were instructed (after running to escape) to come BACK up the stairs? makes you wonder if they were purposely told not to attempt to escape for a reason. Less witnesses of the pre-explosions?

  • @wordsbeliever1000 at least these women didn't give there names to be tracked down

  • @wordsbeliever1000 Yeah ya right, you may also remember the Automated Announcments throughout the building were telling people to go back to their Offices and wait for extraction. WHAT Fire Drill would do that ?

  • @wordsbeliever1000 And more victims to "revenge"....

  • wow thats a big and important witness she said that she thinks that that few seconds before first plane hit an explosions wnt off in the lobby cus she said whn she passed the lobby befor plane hit there was no lobby it was torn up and she saw a woman with her face blown up was on the floor of the lobby and all this was b4 first plane hit. INSIDE JOB 1000000%

  • @benjyboba-What claims? I've made no claims. I think your going to be hardpressed to find a statistic to show that "most" people believe it's an inside job. So far, no "twoofer" has been able to come up with any hood evidence that 9/11 was an inside job. All of the so-called "evidence" is based off bad logic and lies.

  • Why have I never heard of any family speak out for family fallen in the planes. Anyone?

  • @Danimal102306 interesting, only one I can think of was the husband of a flight attendant who I guess HAD to be there, he was surprised that she had managed to phone him from her cell phone. There is soo much investigation that needs to be done

  • Dalek14mc needs educating. Please watch some videos from David Chandler. "David Chandler at Visalia Friends Meeting", Watch all 9 parts and other videos on his channel. I learned a lot about physics. After seeing the vids, I can't believe anything about the collapse. Its quite suprizing how ignorant nist actually have been. His a physics teacher, The buildings if collapsed they way they said has been cheating physics. Watch the vid then make your own mind up afterwards. This guy is fair :)

  • @benjyboba-LOL, I find it funny that you say that (normal) people need to be educated yet you conspiracy theorists are some of the most uneducated people in the entire world. Go back to your mom's basement.

  • @dalek14mc Lol, I find it even funnier that your calling me un-educated, yet you don't know anything about me. What your trying to do is shoot down conspiracy theorist because they are telling the truth. An uneducated person, would say "A plane hit the building, started a fire and it fell down", just as they see but they don't even consider researching, They are totally gullable. Are you disputing David Chandler and the physics he demonstrates in the videos. You gotta be uneducated if you can.

  • @benjyboba-Um, hello, you were the one pointing out that I was "uneducated," hypocrite. You're right, a smart wouldn't say "A plane hit the building, started a fire and it fell down", an educated person would say "A plane hit the bulding, started a fire, burned for several hours, the steel weakened, and then fell down. You conspiracy theorists are everything BUT rational, you're just a bunch of lying scumbags who have everything BUT the truth on your side.

  • @dalek14mc What a fucking pathetic claim you make, most of the people know it was an inside job, yet idiots like you continue to try and lie and don't know when your beaten. If your not lieing then you dam stupid. simple and obvious, you haven't watched the David Chanler physics video. The building can't collapse, there is 1200 engineers who are confused. How about the projectiles that went faster than gravity. Do proper research or stop trying to convince the uneducated. Physics show the lies.

  • @MegaSlaze- Now actually read my comment, dufus. I said that building 7 burnt for 7 HOURS. I see that this conspiracy theory has made you so dumb, that you can't even understand measurements of time.

  • @MegaSlaze-Now actually read my comment, dufus

  • amazing foolished (us citizon) inside job

  • illuminati explosive control from building 7

  • jesus christ, this was from the attack about a decade before.

  • @RealGateGuardian listen very closely to the last 10 seconds, she says there was a bomb first then the first plane hit

  • @goweatherundergr0und That is about the most illogical response I have read on this thread so far. Get a clue and quit being a conspiracy theorist. They told you those buildings fell due to the "Pancake Collapse THEORY" which they were forced to change and now call the "Pile Driver THEORY". Goweatherundergr0und, go learn the most elementary LAWS of Physics and Gravity which will quickly help end your current predicament. God Bless You!

    9/-- TRUTH NOW!!!

    Daniel Edd Bland III

    US Army, Iraq 2003

  • @bland229 I agree with that Pile collapse theory, because in normal demolitions the whole building falls, like cut at the bottom, and in all footage I see the building still standing below the falling cloud.

    Although, that doesn't explain for me why the lobby was blown out.

  • @bland229 Oh, and the explosions firefighters and other people heard and felt in their hair in the basement.

  • Comment removed

  • how can you trust BLACK people!!!!!?????

  • @jukodebu trololololol

  • @jukodebu how can you trust WHITE people!!!!!?????

  • @prodigy45 don't know, how can you

  • @jukodebu Dunno, the best option may be to trust no one! Not even yourself!

  • @prodigy45 if you can't trust yoself who can you?

  • @jukodebu Maybe that one crazy guy?

  • @goweatherundergr0und "Humans are irrationally prone to conspiracy,"

    You know, I've never ONCE seen anything proving that "contention". I have however heard it spouted many times, always by people trying to imply that governments and conventional "wisdom" are right, and people that go against it, are not.

    Odd that, isn't it?

  • It pains me to say it was an inside job, but, if i was a german living in the 1940's it would pain me to say that my leader burnt down the reichstag, or if i was a roman living under Nero, I would not want to say that Nero burnt down Rome. For explosions to be going off in the building before the planes hit, it most definitely was some kind of inside job, most likely to create a fervor of anger at the Arabs, so that all of the middle east could be invaded with a moral cause. Like the crusades

  • @superpositivechange my tummy hurts, gasses

  • explosions before plane even hit. Obvious INSIDE JOB. You can watch hundreds of interviews online of eyewitnesses people, and just LISTEN to what they say, and think about what they're saying for ONE second.. Obvious inside job.

  • Pipe ? That's silly

  • A very similar eye witness account: /watch?v=urNEAakzOYk&feature=r­elated

  • SUPPORT THE SEPT 11TH, 2001 RESEARCH AND DISCOVERY PROJECT!

  • inside job.

  • I think they are fortunate to have an african american woman with them when they were re-instructed to return and go back up the stairs. African Americans have a different and much stronger survival instinct in times like that. I'm sure when they said come back she said "hell no, come on you all let's get the hell outta here!" God bless her. I bet she's a heroe.

  • Many, many WINESSES inc. fire rescue & police who were there have said they have heard explosions. Two planes crashing into the towers would NEVER bring these vast buildings down alone. There were no plane parts at the Pentagon where a cruise missle shaped "jumbo jet" is caught on film hitting the building. Certain witnesses who have pursued the explosion claims have come to mysterious demises. The USA is & always has been corrupt. Now God is paying you out for your dirty deed! RIP the innocents

  • @foriamonlyahorse11 Yes. the USA has gaily sown the wind - Now it is weeping and reaping the whirlwind - NOBODY ever escapes what they do; where there's a tick, there's a tock - like it or not! - And there's going to be a THUNDER of tocks very shortly indeed! - Watch and see.

  • @foriamonlyahorse11 Wow!!! You are one ignorant person

  • Comment removed

  • @foriamonlyahorse11 What is this God you speak of?

  • @foriamonlyahorse11 You're on to something.

  • @foriamonlyahorse11 Nothing hit the pentagon, they demolished one small part of the building with explosives and the plane flew right past it.

  • @Neicios

    "Omar Campo, a Salvadorean, was cutting the grass on the other side of the road when the plane flew over his head. 'It was a passenger plane. I think an American Airways plane,' Mr Campo said. 'I was cutting the grass and it came in screaming over my head. I felt the impact. The whole ground shook and the whole area was full of fire. I could never imagine I would see anything like that here.'"

    - "Pentagon Eyewitness Accounts." The Guardian, 12 Sep 2001

    911 TRUTH DEBUNKED!

  • @foriamonlyahorse11-"Two planes crashing into the towers would NEVER bring these vast buildings down alone"

    Yes, they would, and your assertion that they wouldn't is just that, an assertion. If you believe this, than explain to me WHY a 640 ton airliner, traveling at literally hundreds of miles per hour, and carrying thousands of gallons of jet fuel, wouldn't bring those buildings down.

    Hint: Conspiracy theorists usually can't answer this question, because they know they're wrong.

  • @dalek14mc So a crash at the top of a building would bring the entire building down?

    First thing, learn logic. Second, physics.

    The building came down at an alarming rate; demolition. If it proclaimed, "weakened" the structure, it would stubbornly come down at a slow rate, not all at once.

    WTC 7 was a PERFECT example of a demolition, you cannot deny that.

  • @MegaSlaze-Building 7 this, and building 7 that. What you conspiracy theorists don't understand or accept, is that is doesn't take a plane to bring down a building. Building 7 was the first buidling IN HISTORY to burn for over 7 hours longs.

    "i would stubbornly come down at a slow rate, not all at once."

    We're talking about skyskrapers, not wooden buildings that would gradually fall apart. The top of the buildings collapsed on their bottom portions, which is why they came down.

  • @dalek14mc i'll answer it for you, the building was like poking a pen through a mosquito net, it was designed to withstand a simular plane hitting it, From the time the empire state building was hit, future planing and health and safety had to ensure buildings could withstand plane hits. There are videos showing they were designed to take the impacts. They were standing after it was hit, which is proof, demolition was a seperate event.

  • @benjyboba-You do realize that the demolition theory is one of dumbest theories out there, right? Do you understand how much planning would be involved in planting hundreds of pounds of explosives inside a building where people are working, without being noticed, and detonated in the exact spot where a 757 crashed? Believing in the 9/11 conspiracy theory implies supernatural abilities of the conspirators.

  • @dalek14mc Ever recall the '93 WTC bombing?

    Aha, even FBI agents admitted they gave those terrorists explosives, 8 years later is the perfect time.

    You basically proved that Building 7 was demolished, due to the fact it wasn't on fire, nor did it get hit.

    "We're talking about skyscrapers, not wooden buildings."

    Again, you've proved me right.

    Wouldn't a skyscraper have better support than a wooden building?

    Exactly, you wouldn't need bombs to tear down a wooden building.

  • @dalek14mc Do you relise they had power down and they could have easily prepared it for demolition.What if they used nano thermite in the form of paint. They people can be discuised as doing different jobs. What about night time. What about places people don't normally go or are not there all the time, during lunch breaks. you are thick as shit if you think it takes supernatural people to do a job like that, just a bit of thought, needed. What about fire drill practise. I could go on and on.

  • @FLICKtheUSA - ANY excuse to prove that the Earth is flat and the Moon is made of Swiss cheese! - It's pretty obvious how desperate the comatose turnips are getting, as it gets ever more difficult to hang onto their bunny and buttercup world!

    - Poor diddums just can't face the world as it really is - Natural enough!

  • @rumbleofdrums:

    We hear: "DEBUNKED. DEBUNKED. DEBUNKED." We might just as well have heard:

    "DONKEY. DONKEY.DONKEY." - But you know what? - One can repeat these silly childish mantras as long as one likes - The problem remains witj the mantra-caller, fair and square! - WHY?

    Simply put:

    Call a man a donkey a thousand million times; he will NEVER grow furry ears and crave carrots! - hehehe! - Plain and simple!

  • Taking the word of a nigger and a spic over that of engineers.

  • @FLICKtheUSA Truth, remains Truth no matter what! - So why argue the toss and get all hot under the collar? - A diamond remains a diamond, whatever: it makes no difference if you tell everyone it is glass! - Those that push 'their' plastic truth are the ones to be suspicious of; just WHY do they promote the crap so vehemently? - Because they know that crap is crap and has an unmistakable stink no matter how many gallons of lavender water you pour over!

  • @CUERVOLUMINOSO

    Put down the meth.

  • @FLICKtheUSA - Tastes too much like Truth for brainwashed comatose turnips, eh? hehehehe!

  • @CUERVOLUMINOSO

    Sure.

    Two idiots saying they heard explosions is not proof of anything.

    They're probably hungover from malt liqueur the night before.

  • @FLICKtheUSA You are a jackass.

    

  • @cockyhemi

    LOL...

  • I believe Arab terrorists believing they were working for Allah and what it meant to them, flew planes into targets to destroy them - without the knowledge of the US establishment. I believe they were funded and controlled by Al Q. I believe it is possible that within the US establishment and it's intelligence agencies, some people may have had an idea of what was to happen. I believe that those 'insiders' have no loyalty to the USA, because that's the nature of espionage and secret services.

  • @rumbleofdrums Check out the interview with Osama bin Laden printed in the Karachi-based newspaper Ummat in Urdu, soon after 9/11; available in English.

    How MANY people out there have read that particular interview or even know of its existence? I have not the slightest intention of doing everyone's homework and to give a sinopsis of the content! Of course, we all know the Number One terrorist was 'fed to the fishes', apparently! So conveniently preventing him from verifying that content again!

  • @rumbleofdrums Yeah that's what almost everyone believed until people did many many hours of research and found the overwhelming evidence that it was an inside job.

  • How do you know that Al Q didn't plant the 'bomb in the lobby'?

    How do you know everybody you quote isn't working for the dark side of the Arab League? How do you know that Israeli, Al Q or Martian agents working WITHIN the CIA didn't cover things up. How do you know the 'insiders' in your 'inside job' were not working AGAINST the USA? Your establishment isn't bent - only people WITHIN establishments are bent. USA didn't commit 911, enemies within did.

    You don't know anything.

  • @rumbleofdrums Lol no person on earth ever said the USA did 9/11... People said that people within the USA government helped the terrorist attacks take place. Had those people not helped the attacks would have been impossible.

  • @100101010101010100 Well then, I'm the 1st. The government of the USA and others allied with it, arranged 9/11.

  • you have all been debunked and revealed as people who present video images, quotes and audio out of context, people who misrepresent the truth, people who ignore the very real human frailities involved in stressful conditions and situations, people who are blind to the falibilities of reports during 'in the moment experiences'. You have all been debunked as liars and people who exploit emotion and truth for your own media based ends. DEBUNKED DEBUNKED DEBUNKED

  • @rumbleofdrums DID the BBC ever tell the world the SOURCE of that news item they gaily announced to the British audience? No! they blithely told us it was a "cock-up". Naturally, the British audience did NOT know the skyline of New York and the faux pas was swept under the carpet toute suite, never to see the light of day for YEARS! Until an American decided to get it out onto YouTube, who desperately tried to cancel it! - Too late, as it happens, it went viral, yet was never properly explained!

  • @CUERVOLUMINOSO POST SCRIPT:

    Google:

    9/11 BBC Phil Hayton Jane Standley WTC7 cock up.

    Then try and swallow the fact that the BBC never disclosed its SOURCE, and that it initially pathetically claimed it had lost all the copies of the 9/11 footage kept, by law, in three different locations! IF one can believe those patently daft explanations, we can now assume, after all, the Earth IS flat and the Moon IS indeed made of Swiss cheese! Welcome to the world of brainwashed, comatose turnips! LOL!!!

  • @CUERVOLUMINOSO

    explanation

    the BBC got the story wrong

    news flash -- it happens

    result -- truther logic dictates it must be some sinister plot

    rest of the world -- duh truthers rule!

  • No need to mention names; they know perfectly well who they are! (They WILL wear the cap and it will fit them well!) - The explanation for brainwashed comatose turnips who think governments are whiter than white and we are all in a bunny and buttercup world:

    The Earth IS flat; the Moon IS made of Swiss cheese! There! - I have admitted it! - Now all those brainwashed comatose turnips can sleep well in their beds with their teddies and dollies after Mummy has tucked them up and kissed them! LOL

  • @CUERVOLUMINOSO POST SCRIPT:

    To see just WHY those brainwashed comatose turnips are so horribly frightened:

    GOOGLE:

    WTC7 Phil Hayton Jane Standley 9/11 BBC cock-up

  • @CUERVOLUMINOSO

    I have no fucking idea how you think that supports your claims

  • @Denierbud11 NOTA BENE:

    This entity recognizes perfectly to whom I refer - and then just feigns ignorance when it chooses! - Let it wander on through its life through the buttercups and bunnies it is desperately cutting out of cardboard, as it so chooses. It is not OUR problem!

  • Comment removed

  • @MrNigelhampton ... "Mirror-imaging"  ... "Espejismo" as the Spanish psychologists call it; at its most exquiste manifestion!

  • Nothing to see here. Move along. Trust the government. They are your friends

  • @Corin616 That's right! - Just like Herr Adolf Hitler was friends to the German people as they moved along! - Nothing much to see at Auschwitz? . No connection anwhere? - Just wait until the bunny and buttercup world of the sheeple gets swept away - They'll blame EVERYONE else but themselves, of course; mark my words!

  • so what destroyed the lobby????....the basements,all the way down 7th were booby-trapped...

  • 9/11 liar trying to support obl hided timebomb under the lobby and used nano thermite with jet fuels and high frequncy waves to connect phonelines with land phone from plane, its an inside job, everybody knows it,

  • how the hell are these hoodrats credible sources? this is not evidence or proof, its the confused, manic account of someone who was caught up in it all

    if you idiots care to look, there are clear, rational explanations for how the buildings fell, including building 7, etc etc. stop looking for your answers in dumbass youtube videos like this one

    idiots! itwastyped. com for more details

  • Why the fuck are you calling them hoodrats you racist asshole? They were as the video mentioned office workers who were employed there and as far as i'm concerned they are far more credible than a fucking sheep like you. Go drink the KOOL-AID ASSHOLE

  • @piker19 haha, didnt mean to upset you! all these supposed eyewitness accounts and coincidences but as usual, not a single shred of evidence from the conspiracy theorists. just wild conclusions, ignorance of the giant holes in your own logic and a complete disregard of occams razor (thats right look it up dumb shit). like i said the rational, intelligent answers are there if you seek them instead of biased, fan made conspiratoral bs. itwastyped. com = educate yourself and lose the paranoia!

  • @culturebully3 No, they're eyewitness accounts, and your shit stinks as you insult the witnesses

    Go fuck yourself, shithead.

  • @Orgasmosexicon haha, typical conspiracy theorist getting all defensive. unable to argue so just starts throwing insults cos he has nothing to say and no evidence to give! haha, keep getting drunk on unsubstantiated truth and listening to your ham radio, sitting around and looking for people to blame just because u cant accept the truth that america fucked up and got owned by a bunch of arabs. its easier to believe in the consp. theory isn't it? itwastyped. com for more info and TRUTH ;)

  • @culturebully3 Rubbish and nonsense. You haven't cited a damn fucking thing to back ANY OF YOUR CLAIMS. Just bullshit, more bullshit, and yet MORE BULLSHIT.

    Hurry up and back your crap, you wimpy little shithead.

  • @Orgasmosexicon go to that website i told you! itwastyped. com under 'consp. theories'. or just search 9/11 myths debunked in google! its all there! aahahhahaha i know youre starting to realise that everything you believe in is paranoid nonsense, what a waste of time all that was, eh?

    still with the insults huh? typical conspiracy theorists keep proving me right! all talk, NO evidence. just wild conclusion. what are you afraid of? that ur gonna be chipped? LOL xxxx

  • @culturebully3 I have a better idea, how about you stop pretending that bullshit doesn't stink, get a real job that doesn't involve posting online lying in defence of the USA and Israeli governments.

    And, by the way, MORON - read the definition for "conspiracy". The official bullshit story from the USA govt is a CONSPIRACY THEORY. That makes you a CONSPIRACY THEORIST.

    Geez, you're dumb to keep up with such ignorant crap all the time. The official fairytale has NO EVIDENCE, IDIOT.

  • @Orgasmosexicon yes it does dumb shit, you just dont want to look at it cos you cant accept america fucked up and just want to find boogeymen to blame for the world problems. if you listen to david icke, ken adachi, bill cooper and those idiots then its no wonder why youre such a paranoid, deluded mess. the facts and evidence supporting the official story are there and have far fewer holes in them than the nonsense that you believe. really think about it. be smart, visit itwastyped. com and see!

  • @culturebully3 What's really hilarious, is that you actually seem to "think" that your shitty little crap excuses sound "clever". They don't. They make you look incredibly stupid because you're trying to defend bullshit that is recognisably bullshit to the majority of the world by now. I don't meet anyone in REAL LIFE who believes that crap you push; only fucking losers such as you, trolling away online.

    The material evidence, witnesses, physics, contradict the official fairytale.

  • @Orgasmosexicon haha, youre just as typical and ill-informed as it gets. seriously you are the epitome of a conspiracy theorist. it is important to remember the ones with the problem and the negative viewpoint are ALWAYS the ones who make the most noise, also your ignorance and bias means you never met "anyone in real life" who believes in what im saying. well maybe you should look into why masses of people are actually deciding this consp. crap is nonsense. itwastyped. com .. educate yourself!

  • @Orgasmosexicon spot on! SPOT ON!! S+P+O+T O+N! - You never said a truer word than what you have just written! - I have seen the 'erudite', 'informed' entity @culturebully3 making an absolute fool of itself elsewhere on these pages - it spouts the same sort of banal, puerile poppycock wherever it trots! - It's arguments from a doubtless loser, are as strong as a wet Kleenex! Period.

  • @Orgasmosexicon Check out the grotesquely hilarious 'cock-up' fiasco of the BBC - They desperately tried to hide the footage of their deja-vu, crystal-ball gazing on WTC7 for YEARS! - Then blithely tried to tell us all, when the story came to light, that all their copies of the 9/11 horror had been lost! - Naturally, that initial poppycock explanation lasted like wet Kleenex before a bulldozer! Jane Standley and Phil Hayton need to be EXTREMELY careful what they say or they could be 'suicided'!!

  • @culturebully3 Agreed, I look for my asnwers in physics - that tells me those collapses could only be controlled demolitions. So, therefore, it was an INSIDE JOB.

    If you knew physics, and stop playing IDIOT, you'd admit that too.

  • @Orgasmosexicon Oh yeah? watch?v=tacYjsS-g6k

    your poor, deluded soul. you dont look for your answers in physics, the dumbass sources where you get your information and using falsified scientific facts. dont be a friggin sheep that gets lost in all these dumb youtube videos, look at UNBIASED, REAL evidence then consider the facts and WHAT MAKES SENSE for yourself. not wild conclusions based on what you WANT to be true, just got you cant accept that some arabs owned america. itwastyped. com !!!!

  • @culturebully3 You poor deluded loser, such a wanker as you, and you want to play games with BULLSHIT

    I'm sorry that you are sooooo stupid, but physics doesn't change despite government propagandists and idiots like you trying to pretend that it does.

    You need to be UNBIASED, and that's something that you're clearly not. You're little twerp who wants to defend govt lies, but doesn't know enough to do so properly.

    You need to grow up, shithead. Your kind are about to go extinct.

  • Comment removed

  • @culturebully3 It's funny when little shitheads such as you come online, trying to pretend to be smart, when what you really do is reveal what moronic little twits you are.

    You make bullshit claims, try to pretend that official fairytale makes sense, and even use ridiculous numbers of puppet accounts to rig votes - and you still lose. So stupid. Only the braindead believe you shitty little trolls. Why don't you go and debate in a bar, you fool. The drunks might listen to your stupid excuses.

  • @culturebully3 Your video of the alleged "debunking" is debunked itself by physics. There's actually no way for anyone to achieve a straightdown through it's own structure collapse in less than a minute for a steel-framed skyscraper WITHOUT CONTROLLED DEMOLITION. If you believe otherwise, then you are an IDIOT.

    watch?v=OW9z08ml230

    That video is bullshit, as most physicists and engineers will tell you.

    Israelis did however have a van packed with explosives, not "Arabs".

    watch?v=z02QrY-jcdk

  • If they were trying to get out that means the first plane had hit...

  • @JandHfilms Not if there was an explosion minutes before the first plane hit, or even seconds before...

  • @MWCQL

    I agree. But this video doesn not show this or even mention that there were explosions before the first plane hit.

  • @JandHfilms But other videos do show there were explosions before the planes hit. Not that it matters, since it's the manner of the collapses which shouts CONTROLLED DEMOLITION.

    You being yet another fuckwit loser with almost no brain, you'd refused to admit that, of course.

  • @Orgasmosexicon

    I understand that it is easier for you to just insult me than it is to engage me in debate. If you had done some real research into the collapse of the towers you would see why they fell the way they did and why the 'explosives' thoery is nonsense. It does not as you say "shout demolition". Please do some research into the findings of experts and not just videos on youtube...

  • who told them to run back up?

  • you people are kooks and boobs.

  • @Orgasmosexicon Whether the 911 attackers boarded the planes using their own name or stolen or faked ID is only a technical detail. Fact is that they flew the planes into WTC and the pentagon. Plus there are many traces connecting them and Al Qaeda to Germany. Especially the leading persons like Moham