why pay 1 million+ for a car that does 10s out of the box and cant salom? buy a honda or camaro and run 8's for a grand total of 25k or less including car if you want fast.
@2002j30a1 Veyron is real engineering. Not some Honda civic with a coffee can exhaust tip from walmart. I drive a 425 hp 1991 VW Corrado G60. 11.2 in the quarter and an S4 B5 for bad weather. Also I have a little over 15k into my Corrado plus 7k for the car for a grand total of 22k and im not running 8's like you promised.
@cody227 cuz you drive a vw. they are expensive and really not that fast without alot of internal mods to handle alot of boost. ill admit 25k was a bit exaggerated, however under 50k with a car included has been done in 8s before. if you want under 9's in any car be prepared to drop money. and the veyron is impractical engineering. 10 rads? god knows how many valves. and dude it has its own climate controlled bubble to park it in. cuz a stock MS3 will outsalom a veyron and i am not convinced.
@cody227 and when you need to drop 30k for a set of tires about every 2500 miles and 50k for wheels and tires every 10000 miles is THAT practical or real engineering? how much is annual maintence? more than i paid for both my Accord and my Integra combined. at sixty thousand miles they have to SPLIT THE CAR IN HALF. wtf engineering is that? in order to insure it you need to get a policy from a yacht or jet insurance company. sorry man i dont believe in paying that shit for a car.
dunno why people are arguing about prices, not like any normal person could afford one even if they were still available to buy lol, rumour has it that volkswagen made a £1 million loss on each unit made :S
its not $5mil to make each and every veyron. its 5,000,000 on average to make the first 100 veyrons, taking into account the start up and RnD cost. (wikipedia: "Thats the total cost of the entire veyron project divided by the number of veyrons at that time, 2007".). when more veyrons are produced, the total loss decreases. If you calculate, Bugatti actually makes a small profit out of each veyron.
@davidgiggs1 everything is not always about loss. sony takes a loss on every ps3 and microsoft takes a loss in every 360 sold. but somewhere they loss is made up.
@agello24 but think about it this way, sony and microsoft make additional software i.e games, accessories etc, which is where thy make up that loss, once a veyron is sold thats it, no aftermarket parts to add, no accessories, the bugatti was created for one purpose, to prove a point. and if you ask me they proved it alright lol
the bugatti veyron is from 1.5 million to 1.7million and the mansory bugatti is 2.3million or 2.5million and how much hp is the veyron gt supposed to have cuz i read about how it is supposed to have 1250 or 1350hp
Wow i never knew about this veyron ..and those aero morons ..now shut the fuck up once and for all pricks. Koeniggseggs fans ...dont compare your Swedish.. no history, no prestige, car to the bugatti veyron - aristocracy , racing history ..just like ferrari's.
Bugatti's great I wouldn't compare their history, prestige or racing history to Ferrari's. Bugatti made a few legendary cars from the 20's to the 60's. they didn't make anotha car until 1992 (the EB110), which was a great car. EB110 held the top speed record for a yr until the Jag XJ220. Veyron's arguably better but Ferrari has waymo history. The CCX's r great cars2 man so don't discredit Koenigs totaly. They do lie about bein able to beat the Veyrons speed but they r great on the track w/a wing
Kid you really need to go to school. The Bugatti is shit. The SSC is already proven faster in top speed and only milliseconds behind which is in a flash. Stop riding Bugattis cock. You cant even afford the dam car and your saying its the best. I've rode in a Bugatti and had the chance to drive one thanks to a friend having one. I've also driven the SSC which they let me drive at a car show. Now shut up.
I need to go to school? you're the one who's still saying milliseconds. learn your prefixes you dumb fuck. a millisecond is .001 seconds, the veyron is .3 seconds faster, that's tenths of a second you fuckin idiot. or in your terms it's 300 milliseconds which is a big difference when you're talking acceleration. why don't you look up what a millisecond is before you make more of a retard out of your self w/your apparent 5th grade math level knowledge
And a bugatti is only 1 million bucks. Even a fucking Mclaren F1 cost more than that. Your an idiot. Price isnt nothing. Thats like saying a mercedes is better then a BMW because its more in cost when a BMW has way better performance then a Mercedes. Italian vs German. German automobiles are better than Italian.
I think you misread me. w/a means with a, w/o means without. Without the wing the CCX is kind of shitty on the track. with a wing the CCX is insane on the track, but you're right, not as good as a veyron though
Weight isn't too relative to top speed. It is, but funnily enough, it isn't.
The F1 weighs half the Veyron and has 2/3 of its BHP, but still is only a little slower. And the Veyron is AWD, so that's how it does it in 2.46, but the Aero will pull ahead after launching.
Um no the SSC has over 1147. A .30 milliseconds in acceleration isnt a difference. Thats gone in an instant. The bugatti hits 253 thats it. The SSC hits 259 and didnt hit its rev limit. Nasa tested it and it hit 273 on a wind tunnel.
I can't wait for the veyron gt to officialy to come on sale, and then you twats will be licking my toes. you are now doing the very same when the veyron was the chiron. oh yeah it sucks it will fall apart. but the veyron did come up and it smoked your asses off, and now when the GT will be availible
LOl you cant even afford this car anyway. its still the same piece of shit it was before. Even a custom built Evo VIII can outrun this shit. I custom buitl a 2500 hp Evo and its street legal.
yeah and i build teh SpaceShuttle, went to the moon, get laid,.. got back, and broke the record of the first person to do it on the moon,, now, you wouldnt beleive that either unless you're a fucking moron....=)
Driving a car and doing what you did are two different things. Im not a poor wellfare faggot like you and your family. I could afford to do shit you cant. Just because you havent done it doesnt mean i havent. Now shut the fuck up.
you really are one dumb motherfucker. .30 milliseconds is .0003 sec not .3 sec, which is the difference between the veyron and the Shit Suck Cock Aero. 2.78-2.43=.35 moron, not .0003. who taught you math? george w bush? not only does the veyron have a REV limiter @253 mph but it has 987 hp to the SSC's 1147, that's 160 hp if you can't count, OH YEA, YOU CAN'T!!!! 160 xtra HP & only an xtra 5 mph? that's pathetic & it's also why that record is meaningless. & that's not even mentioning this Veyron
bcuz you didn't get it the first time you fuckin moron. ignorant fucks like you are really annoying. you're a 12 year old kid, maybe even younger. I know that bcuz of the way you talk & from how little you actually know. You make statements that have no legitemate backing & not too mention you claim to hate the veyron yet you spend so much time talking shit about it on a veyron video. you're clearly a pre-pubescent lil faget that doesn't even have a license. you're probably an inbred hick too
You cant spell does that mean your 12 as well? If your gonna say someone is a certain age for doing something dont do something that also shows the samething. You spelled faggot as faget. NUFF SAID plus you said "not too mention you claim to hate the veyron yet you spend so much time talking shit about it on a veyron video" UM WHAT? Of course if i hate the car im gonna spend time talking shit about it. Am i suppose to love something i hate?
@thnk4urself your cussing out a "twelve year old" over something that will never effect either of you because neither of you have the money for the car, or the experience to drive it...you guys know nothing about eachother and insist on arguing who is "better" than the other. go on and live your own lives! its not like youll ever see eachother, thus all these accusations you are making are 100% pointless.
oh and you really look alot better by doing the same thing? do you realize how hypocritical your statement just was? cussing or not you're doing no different than what I did except you're arguing opinion, I argued facts to start. & I have rode in a Veyron so you were wrong to assume that too. I was arguing fact as well as opinion but if his facts weren't fucked up I wouldn't have bothered otherwise but you're right, me being factually right or not, it was completely pointless
Wow, what a car. You know what I hate? When people extremely modify 100 grand or less cars and try to say they are faster than a veyron. Sure, they might beat a veyron in a straight line with special tires and a professional driver, but how long will that 2000 HP engine last before it blows up? The veyron consistently puts all its power down no matter who's driving. A girl could drive the veyron and beat almost anyone. This is the best car of our decade possibly of all time
No it isnt. The car would last with a 2000mph motor without blowing up and smoke a Veyron. you can take a Mitsubishi Evo VIII and give it 1500hp and higher and it would still smoke the Veyron. Another European trash car not worth wasting money on.
you're a fuckin idiot. the reason why no matter how much HP you put in a cheaper car like an EVO is that it would be insanely instable before you get even close to 250 mph. why don't you learn about this shit before you start spewing your uneducated BS. the SSC is a kit-car in most countries, why? bcuz it's a bullshit car made only to break a record, that's. the bugatti Veyron is a masterpiece. you're just pissed now that the veyron has more HP & can easily torch the stupid record
from 0-60 the veyron does about 2.5 seconds... the aero does roguhly 2.7 but the aero has a max of 259 mph whilst the veyron has 257... the aero is cheaper aswell but the veyron is more luxurious and better kept whilst also being more efficient
who things the areo ssc is better then bugatii is bit more a stupid guy because its uglier its got worster brakes and it can only do that speed nothing more PS sorry for my english
You cant even talk. It sucks in braking? Thats why every one whos tested it says its got the best braking and handling ever on a car 4 inches off the ground. You dont even own a Veyron or SSC so shut up.
youre right ssc ultimate areo is maybe faster then original veyron but izt was been always better looking and faster trogh corners better braking and evrithing PS: do you know that bugatti is going in 2012 launch new car??
So you tune now the SSC and it will go 300 mph WTF guys stop hating thta is why there is the cars that we have today because of competition. If the SSC didn't fuck the W16 quad turbo with a push rod V8 and just 2 turbos then the Bugatti would have been "A" really fast car that no one would care to hear about a year later. I love this great competition. Lets see what the SSC has now.
and the veyron W16 is still stock and can be tuned extremely ...... (look at veyron GT: it has only different electronics and does 1350 HP..... that´s not the end..... )
well once it does hit i'm willing to call it the fastest for now Veyron Gt stands on top. oh and that relays on gear changes hit all gears in perfect shift point and there you have the aero's speed over 411 km/h
you know, i'm a american, and the AERO is impressive, despite loking like a Lamb(yes, it looks like a lambo MORE, WAY MORE THAN A SALEEN, OR A F1 for that matter ).
but somehow, somethign tells me that Shelby is crapping in their pants......and with the rumored sucessor in 2012 shooting for 300 mph....Shelby is going to have a giant WTF moment..
too bad they're private, VW could have just bought them out, lol
Did he already get the power upgrade? According to Bugatti's secret memo in 2008 the availability would start in March 2009, and according to the owner of this particular car he would be the first in line to get one. Installation time: 1 month! According to Bugatti the GT upgrade includes upgraded GT brakes. Total price for the GT upgrade is well into six figures.
Yes he did. he some what testing it for Bugatti. and from what I know there is $1,400,000USD in upgrades done to it. but do not think it will be that much when it comes out for everyone.
That sounds interesting. You seem to be very well informed. The hearsay had it in late 2008 that price for the GT upgrade would be around USD 300,000 when made publicly available. However, You were the FIRST in the world to post a video of GT upgraded Veyron, I think. Thanks a lot! I hold your videos in great value. Keep up the good work. :D
This has been flagged as spam show
they say it will hit 150mph in under 9s.thats even faster than the veyron ss(9.8s)
ASSHOLELA 2 weeks ago
they say it will hit 150mph in under 9s.thats even faster than the veyron ss(9.8s)
ASSHOLELA 2 weeks ago
awesome car but damn why 2Mil? :-(
pickle430 6 months ago
why pay 1 million+ for a car that does 10s out of the box and cant salom? buy a honda or camaro and run 8's for a grand total of 25k or less including car if you want fast.
2002j30a1 1 year ago
@2002j30a1 in those cars you look like very other douchebag in the world that thinks they are badass just cause they can go fast....like you
cody227 1 year ago
@cody227 kinda like a rich faggot with a veyron? wtf do you drive a 50 hp metro? go queef on someone else/
2002j30a1 1 year ago
@2002j30a1 Veyron is real engineering. Not some Honda civic with a coffee can exhaust tip from walmart. I drive a 425 hp 1991 VW Corrado G60. 11.2 in the quarter and an S4 B5 for bad weather. Also I have a little over 15k into my Corrado plus 7k for the car for a grand total of 22k and im not running 8's like you promised.
cody227 1 year ago
@cody227 cuz you drive a vw. they are expensive and really not that fast without alot of internal mods to handle alot of boost. ill admit 25k was a bit exaggerated, however under 50k with a car included has been done in 8s before. if you want under 9's in any car be prepared to drop money. and the veyron is impractical engineering. 10 rads? god knows how many valves. and dude it has its own climate controlled bubble to park it in. cuz a stock MS3 will outsalom a veyron and i am not convinced.
2002j30a1 1 year ago
@cody227 and when you need to drop 30k for a set of tires about every 2500 miles and 50k for wheels and tires every 10000 miles is THAT practical or real engineering? how much is annual maintence? more than i paid for both my Accord and my Integra combined. at sixty thousand miles they have to SPLIT THE CAR IN HALF. wtf engineering is that? in order to insure it you need to get a policy from a yacht or jet insurance company. sorry man i dont believe in paying that shit for a car.
2002j30a1 1 year ago
nice number plate: TOP GR :D
VeyronGlen 1 year ago
dunno why people are arguing about prices, not like any normal person could afford one even if they were still available to buy lol, rumour has it that volkswagen made a £1 million loss on each unit made :S
davidgiggs1 2 years ago
Its $5.000.000 USD to make the veyron and about $2.200.000 USD to buy one form them so they lost $2.800.000 USD on each one.
JHA1235 2 years ago
i think thats just insane! but hey, theyve made the car with the most hype in a long time, now they've gotta try and go one better XD
davidgiggs1 2 years ago
@JHA1235
its not $5mil to make each and every veyron. its 5,000,000 on average to make the first 100 veyrons, taking into account the start up and RnD cost. (wikipedia: "Thats the total cost of the entire veyron project divided by the number of veyrons at that time, 2007".). when more veyrons are produced, the total loss decreases. If you calculate, Bugatti actually makes a small profit out of each veyron.
ASSHOLELA 2 weeks ago
@davidgiggs1 everything is not always about loss. sony takes a loss on every ps3 and microsoft takes a loss in every 360 sold. but somewhere they loss is made up.
agello24 1 year ago
@agello24 but think about it this way, sony and microsoft make additional software i.e games, accessories etc, which is where thy make up that loss, once a veyron is sold thats it, no aftermarket parts to add, no accessories, the bugatti was created for one purpose, to prove a point. and if you ask me they proved it alright lol
davidgiggs1 1 year ago
@davidgiggs1 good point! And we have yet to see the shelby aero side by side with the veryon.
agello24 1 year ago
the bugatti veyron is from 1.5 million to 1.7million and the mansory bugatti is 2.3million or 2.5million and how much hp is the veyron gt supposed to have cuz i read about how it is supposed to have 1250 or 1350hp
madmarauder1 2 years ago
how fun would it be to own one. oh man...
todd5854 2 years ago
the difference between the ssc and the buggati is the difference between corvette and ferrari ,, corvette is all made by plastic
sajmir92 2 years ago
i have a car model with less plastic in its interior than your ssc(shit suck-cock)
FailureCnC 2 years ago 7
Haha!
JHA1235 2 years ago
Wow i never knew about this veyron ..and those aero morons ..now shut the fuck up once and for all pricks. Koeniggseggs fans ...dont compare your Swedish.. no history, no prestige, car to the bugatti veyron - aristocracy , racing history ..just like ferrari's.
SidneyXda 2 years ago
Bugatti's great I wouldn't compare their history, prestige or racing history to Ferrari's. Bugatti made a few legendary cars from the 20's to the 60's. they didn't make anotha car until 1992 (the EB110), which was a great car. EB110 held the top speed record for a yr until the Jag XJ220. Veyron's arguably better but Ferrari has waymo history. The CCX's r great cars2 man so don't discredit Koenigs totaly. They do lie about bein able to beat the Veyrons speed but they r great on the track w/a wing
thnk4urself 2 years ago
Kid you really need to go to school. The Bugatti is shit. The SSC is already proven faster in top speed and only milliseconds behind which is in a flash. Stop riding Bugattis cock. You cant even afford the dam car and your saying its the best. I've rode in a Bugatti and had the chance to drive one thanks to a friend having one. I've also driven the SSC which they let me drive at a car show. Now shut up.
XXXSpartan118XXX 2 years ago
I need to go to school? you're the one who's still saying milliseconds. learn your prefixes you dumb fuck. a millisecond is .001 seconds, the veyron is .3 seconds faster, that's tenths of a second you fuckin idiot. or in your terms it's 300 milliseconds which is a big difference when you're talking acceleration. why don't you look up what a millisecond is before you make more of a retard out of your self w/your apparent 5th grade math level knowledge
thnk4urself 2 years ago
You still proved my point kid. Hahahahahaha Veyron sucks. SSC is the new fastest production car. get the fuck over it. Its not like you have the car.
XXXSpartan118XXX 2 years ago
eh you shut the fuck up.... a Bugatti is like a zilion times more save than that tin can on steriods of yours....=)
weetnietgeen 2 years ago
And a bugatti is only 1 million bucks. Even a fucking Mclaren F1 cost more than that. Your an idiot. Price isnt nothing. Thats like saying a mercedes is better then a BMW because its more in cost when a BMW has way better performance then a Mercedes. Italian vs German. German automobiles are better than Italian.
XXXSpartan118XXX 2 years ago
dipshit, a Bugatti is 2M dollars :) not 1....
weetnietgeen 2 years ago
Its 1.5 million and still garbage. I guess one mans TRASH is another mans treasure if you get my drift.
XXXSpartan118XXX 2 years ago
@weetnietgeen its 1.2 million genius
KerryGetz1122 2 years ago
huh? :P the Pegasso edition isnt 1.2... more like 2m - 3m :)
weetnietgeen 2 years ago
you mean Koenigseggs's SUCK on the track w/a wing... WITH a wing they are soo much more better, but not as good as a Veyron tho :P
weetnietgeen 2 years ago
I think you misread me. w/a means with a, w/o means without. Without the wing the CCX is kind of shitty on the track. with a wing the CCX is insane on the track, but you're right, not as good as a veyron though
thnk4urself 2 years ago
SSC aero has 1147 HP
Bugatti 1001HP
SSC aero 0-60 2.8 (2.78)
Bugatti 2.5 (2.46)
SSC has much more power but it just 2.78 0-60. It's more than half of tone lighter then bugatti but it's just 5 miles faster.
TreinKub 2 years ago
Weight isn't too relative to top speed. It is, but funnily enough, it isn't.
The F1 weighs half the Veyron and has 2/3 of its BHP, but still is only a little slower. And the Veyron is AWD, so that's how it does it in 2.46, but the Aero will pull ahead after launching.
And don't get me wrong - I'm against the Aero.
LordJesseD 2 years ago
Um no the SSC has over 1147. A .30 milliseconds in acceleration isnt a difference. Thats gone in an instant. The bugatti hits 253 thats it. The SSC hits 259 and didnt hit its rev limit. Nasa tested it and it hit 273 on a wind tunnel.
XXXSpartan118XXX 2 years ago
I can't wait for the veyron gt to officialy to come on sale, and then you twats will be licking my toes. you are now doing the very same when the veyron was the chiron. oh yeah it sucks it will fall apart. but the veyron did come up and it smoked your asses off, and now when the GT will be availible
FailureCnC 2 years ago
LOl you cant even afford this car anyway. its still the same piece of shit it was before. Even a custom built Evo VIII can outrun this shit. I custom buitl a 2500 hp Evo and its street legal.
XXXSpartan118XXX 2 years ago
yeah and i build teh SpaceShuttle, went to the moon, get laid,.. got back, and broke the record of the first person to do it on the moon,, now, you wouldnt beleive that either unless you're a fucking moron....=)
weetnietgeen 2 years ago
Driving a car and doing what you did are two different things. Im not a poor wellfare faggot like you and your family. I could afford to do shit you cant. Just because you havent done it doesnt mean i havent. Now shut the fuck up.
XXXSpartan118XXX 2 years ago
you really are one dumb motherfucker. .30 milliseconds is .0003 sec not .3 sec, which is the difference between the veyron and the Shit Suck Cock Aero. 2.78-2.43=.35 moron, not .0003. who taught you math? george w bush? not only does the veyron have a REV limiter @253 mph but it has 987 hp to the SSC's 1147, that's 160 hp if you can't count, OH YEA, YOU CAN'T!!!! 160 xtra HP & only an xtra 5 mph? that's pathetic & it's also why that record is meaningless. & that's not even mentioning this Veyron
thnk4urself 2 years ago
You said the same thing tiwice nuff said.
XXXSpartan118XXX 2 years ago
bcuz you didn't get it the first time you fuckin moron. ignorant fucks like you are really annoying. you're a 12 year old kid, maybe even younger. I know that bcuz of the way you talk & from how little you actually know. You make statements that have no legitemate backing & not too mention you claim to hate the veyron yet you spend so much time talking shit about it on a veyron video. you're clearly a pre-pubescent lil faget that doesn't even have a license. you're probably an inbred hick too
thnk4urself 2 years ago
You cant spell does that mean your 12 as well? If your gonna say someone is a certain age for doing something dont do something that also shows the samething. You spelled faggot as faget. NUFF SAID plus you said "not too mention you claim to hate the veyron yet you spend so much time talking shit about it on a veyron video" UM WHAT? Of course if i hate the car im gonna spend time talking shit about it. Am i suppose to love something i hate?
XXXSpartan118XXX 2 years ago
@thnk4urself your cussing out a "twelve year old" over something that will never effect either of you because neither of you have the money for the car, or the experience to drive it...you guys know nothing about eachother and insist on arguing who is "better" than the other. go on and live your own lives! its not like youll ever see eachother, thus all these accusations you are making are 100% pointless.
KerryGetz1122 2 years ago
oh and you really look alot better by doing the same thing? do you realize how hypocritical your statement just was? cussing or not you're doing no different than what I did except you're arguing opinion, I argued facts to start. & I have rode in a Veyron so you were wrong to assume that too. I was arguing fact as well as opinion but if his facts weren't fucked up I wouldn't have bothered otherwise but you're right, me being factually right or not, it was completely pointless
thnk4urself 2 years ago
there is no way the ssc will ever win the battle with the veyron. EVER.
FailureCnC 2 years ago 3
Yes becouse Veyron has a better handling
TreinKub 2 years ago
It's fast, but the styling, i'm sorry, it just looks stupid.
barthoedemaker 2 years ago
Wow, what a car. You know what I hate? When people extremely modify 100 grand or less cars and try to say they are faster than a veyron. Sure, they might beat a veyron in a straight line with special tires and a professional driver, but how long will that 2000 HP engine last before it blows up? The veyron consistently puts all its power down no matter who's driving. A girl could drive the veyron and beat almost anyone. This is the best car of our decade possibly of all time
TJComer02 2 years ago 10
No it isnt. The car would last with a 2000mph motor without blowing up and smoke a Veyron. you can take a Mitsubishi Evo VIII and give it 1500hp and higher and it would still smoke the Veyron. Another European trash car not worth wasting money on.
XXXSpartan118XXX 2 years ago
you're a fuckin idiot. the reason why no matter how much HP you put in a cheaper car like an EVO is that it would be insanely instable before you get even close to 250 mph. why don't you learn about this shit before you start spewing your uneducated BS. the SSC is a kit-car in most countries, why? bcuz it's a bullshit car made only to break a record, that's. the bugatti Veyron is a masterpiece. you're just pissed now that the veyron has more HP & can easily torch the stupid record
thnk4urself 2 years ago
from 0-60 the veyron does about 2.5 seconds... the aero does roguhly 2.7 but the aero has a max of 259 mph whilst the veyron has 257... the aero is cheaper aswell but the veyron is more luxurious and better kept whilst also being more efficient
billybileci 2 years ago 4
This comment has received too many negative votes show
aero is the fastest production car in the world until ugly fat veryon r sutin beats it stfu u waismans
Bulletzz1 2 years ago
new veyron gt is faster than the aero it tops 439kmh so stfu!
dowzy92 2 years ago
but the aero is supposedly faster!
09erf8330 2 years ago
who things the areo ssc is better then bugatii is bit more a stupid guy because its uglier its got worster brakes and it can only do that speed nothing more PS sorry for my english
patko1610 2 years ago
You cant even talk. It sucks in braking? Thats why every one whos tested it says its got the best braking and handling ever on a car 4 inches off the ground. You dont even own a Veyron or SSC so shut up.
XXXSpartan118XXX 2 years ago
the veyron GT is the fastest car on earth (NOT aero): Veyron GT has 1350 HP and runs about 425 km/h with an empty-weight of almost 2 tons
Pitkona 2 years ago
The Bugatti will stay number 1.. no matter how hard the Ultimate Aero tries it will never be nearly as good as the Veyron :)
RsGhost1 2 years ago 4
totally agree
Giviet 2 years ago
youre right ssc ultimate areo is maybe faster then original veyron but izt was been always better looking and faster trogh corners better braking and evrithing PS: do you know that bugatti is going in 2012 launch new car??
patko1610 2 years ago
Sweet
RsGhost1 2 years ago
its caled bugatti bourdeaux in its looks like veyron in body of sedan its got the same engine like veyron and its not so sweet
patko1610 2 years ago
look at veyron gt (1350 HP and it´s just the beginning.....) Aero is not the fastest but the ugliest car in the world.....LOL
Pitkona 2 years ago 6
right
patko1610 2 years ago
You are absolutely right, RsGhost1.
The stock W16 can be still extremely tuned....
VW is the best of all
Pitkona 2 years ago
The Bugatti is faster, better looking and more luxurious.. The End as Jeremy Clarkson would have said :P
RsGhost1 2 years ago
So you tune now the SSC and it will go 300 mph WTF guys stop hating thta is why there is the cars that we have today because of competition. If the SSC didn't fuck the W16 quad turbo with a push rod V8 and just 2 turbos then the Bugatti would have been "A" really fast car that no one would care to hear about a year later. I love this great competition. Lets see what the SSC has now.
TheRebuttle 2 years ago
and the veyron W16 is still stock and can be tuned extremely ...... (look at veyron GT: it has only different electronics and does 1350 HP..... that´s not the end..... )
VW is the best
Pitkona 2 years ago 2
i hope when this will come into a top gear
patko1610 2 years ago
no, is has 1350 hp, and 1250 bhp horse power, top speed 272mph
and burgatti said you might have to have a poilet licenses to get behind the wheel.
4 turbo-8.0L W16 ENGINE
I love how burgatti refuses to be second.
Price tag at 3-4 million - better start saving up cause i am.lol
hardbody100 2 years ago
the bugatti veyron gt hits 425km while the ultimate aero top speed is 411km.... bugatti FTW
juanox10 2 years ago 2
man the ultimate aero can past the Bugatti the aero can hit speeds upto 286 it never did it but its capable
xyoskeleton 2 years ago
but the bugatti overall is better then the aero thats why bugatti is called the best car yet but i think the ultimate aero is faster
xyoskeleton 2 years ago
if you built the car for performance and it loses to an engine half its size then the car is not the best,,ssc ftw!!!!!
bigbody001 2 years ago
haha so true
xyoskeleton 2 years ago
Bugatti didn't build it just for performance they built it to be the best car ever. Thats why it has leather, ac, and a stereo that cost $30,000
norman12341234 2 years ago 2
well they should spent a little more time on the engine
bigbody001 2 years ago
well once it does hit i'm willing to call it the fastest for now Veyron Gt stands on top. oh and that relays on gear changes hit all gears in perfect shift point and there you have the aero's speed over 411 km/h
Giviet 2 years ago
maybe veyron gt better than ssc aero
cooldude2100 2 years ago
you know, i'm a american, and the AERO is impressive, despite loking like a Lamb(yes, it looks like a lambo MORE, WAY MORE THAN A SALEEN, OR A F1 for that matter ).
but somehow, somethign tells me that Shelby is crapping in their pants......and with the rumored sucessor in 2012 shooting for 300 mph....Shelby is going to have a giant WTF moment..
too bad they're private, VW could have just bought them out, lol
tippership 2 years ago 2
now i want to see those SSC AERO noobs :)
stressstressstress 2 years ago 4
with 16 cylinders and 4 turbos, it better be quick
jamaicanlovrboy 2 years ago 2
the gt has
1350hp
1380 torgue can do 272 mph
2.0 to 60
1/4 mile in 9 seconds
now thats wt i call fast!!!!!
:D:D:D:D
havenstone19 2 years ago 5
Woooo yeah a Nissan GT-R at 0:40
^_^
zhadow7 2 years ago
1001hp or 1250hp that car is just seriously quick!
torquemenistan 2 years ago
thew gt hass 1350hp and 1380torgue
havenstone19 2 years ago
What time did he do in 1/4 mile with it ?
And congrats to getting a ride in it ! I hope he also let u drive it, it's a dream to be in this car. Thanks for posting the vids.
nefto69 2 years ago
the new gt can do it in 9 seconds :D:D:D:D i want one realli bad lol
havenstone19 2 years ago
top speed is 270 mph!
099psp 2 years ago
272mph matey just read up about it :D
havenstone19 2 years ago
thanks
099psp 2 years ago
OMG GT-R here in Arizona? Sweet! I saw one on the freeway a moth agoe.Btw is that in Scottsdale?
AsianVietAlex 2 years ago
officially, there is no such thing as veyron GT for now. Where did you get your stats from foo lol
vesuviu2 2 years ago
omg , google it !
kenanlambo 2 years ago 2
There is NO official statement from Bugatti about a Veyron GT. Only specualtion from less reputable sites.
vesuviu2 2 years ago 2
totally agreed, i really want to know more things about the GT from bugatti it self, and they say nothing abt it in Bugatti site.
METAL4EVER0 2 years ago
no, becausecompanies dont post always, their top stuff
otherwise you'd hear about the BMW 8 series (super new)....coming out on their site, etx...
but ...i cant wait till the GT takes the record for fastest car
tippership 2 years ago
Did he already get the power upgrade? According to Bugatti's secret memo in 2008 the availability would start in March 2009, and according to the owner of this particular car he would be the first in line to get one. Installation time: 1 month! According to Bugatti the GT upgrade includes upgraded GT brakes. Total price for the GT upgrade is well into six figures.
mikefin 2 years ago
Yes he did. he some what testing it for Bugatti. and from what I know there is $1,400,000USD in upgrades done to it. but do not think it will be that much when it comes out for everyone.
JHA1235 2 years ago
That sounds interesting. You seem to be very well informed. The hearsay had it in late 2008 that price for the GT upgrade would be around USD 300,000 when made publicly available. However, You were the FIRST in the world to post a video of GT upgraded Veyron, I think. Thanks a lot! I hold your videos in great value. Keep up the good work. :D
mikefin 2 years ago 2
Yeah, and I know the owner pretty well so. and yeah I saw that, and yeah I'm the first next to the owner. And thanks alot!
JHA1235 2 years ago
i like the gtr better
justbecausevideos 2 years ago
Comment removed
METAL4EVER0 2 years ago