@HereIsJesus the electricity from the battery ejects electrons from the water molacules, the electrons are then atracted via the negative of the cell to the battery, this is how the joe cell works and why Stan pulsed his units.
@brokensaber nope, electron removal is the key, the ionisation increases the electron ejection, google self sputtering beyond threshold, the joe cell simply removes the electons by draining them (best word i can think of) via the negative of a battery, batteries gain in voltage from this. By always leaving the negative on the posative ions atract and the battery contains the ejected electrons giving us an ion posable plama energy.
i was trying to test the stanley meyer notion of electron exteraction to increase efficiency-later experiments with distilled water show that this is not induction nor is it current leakage-thanx for commenting
No, Dragonboy34 is wrong.. I am a Physicist-->(close enough) and while saying that an electron is "arbitrary happenstance" he is close, however, in theory, if -it- is "both and neither"
and "both are we and not", it would be safe to assume that this deems us intrinsically the like, and viewable as the like..
Sorry, for the bull shit... look up "fastest laser pulse" Some Swiss dude can map, track, chart, molest and pork electrons in his sleep.. check it out
well, they have no mass. they behave like a wave and a particle at the same time...they were theorized. no one has been able to specifically 'spot' any electron in any element at any time. orbitals are areas of probability, not locations of these behaviors. if you talk to any good physicist, when you ask them about electrons, they will say, "Electrons don't exist, they're a theory."
and no im not a physicist, i just was born into a family of physicists and doctors and their friends...i could tell you why 99% of supplements are b.s. though.
thats ok i was just asking-although it seems the accepted theory has stood up pretty well so far-most of science is applied theory anyway-but then there are always strange things that dont fit to theory.
sweet...i never thought of it that way. right on that part...we've done plenty of experiments that'd make interesting videos...too bad some weren't too safe.
Good job, electron extractin is what you want for a more effcient fuel cell. This is what enables the undescoved energy feild to function. some call it 0 point energy, that may be the case but the white powder build up on your cathode is ions(plasma) held stable in a powder form that has supperconducting properties. torch your cathode on scales and it will lose weight then gain it back well cooling. pm if you want more info.
self cancelling bifilar in series with the cap,(fuel cell) is an rc circuit, more less. Myers text info of the bifilar are not self-cancelling as the drawings show.Drawings are wrong.Most ppl build as figs show.which is wrong.
i'm sorry my friend but i should say you are realy wrong about the pll on his drawings he show a 4046 pll + 4001 and and opamp wich are very well explained by the drawings i studied many designes of pll before i realised it was correct. take a look at my video...
Its very clear in the body of the text, but 99% of people thumb past all that and go straight to the drawings....Besides, if it were a self-cancelling bifilar, it would be an RC time constant not an LC circuit at all.
People doing it that way are loosing alot of efficiency.
correction please, the self-cancelling bifilar connection to the electrodes gives the stair-step effect to the main voltage spike. i tried it both ways and noticed that; also a linear wound bifilar coil did not give that effect, only the pancake wound coil seemed to, perhaps the linear one was too small
Note: The Meyers Technical brief drawings showing how to connect the Bifilar coils are wrong. Either by mistake or deliberate. They are Tesla style "Aiding" wound Bifilar. NOT self-cancelling wound as many mistakenly build.
Funny people continue to discredit Meyers electron extraction idea.....When modern fuel cells that are batteries do exactly this commercially. They are called PEM fuel cells. Only they use a hydrocarbon based fuel to keep you going to the pumps.
my experiments are my school.my latest foray into this subject is with de-mineralised water with absolutley NO electrolyte.
i still get voltage,on an electrode placed 20 cm above the cell plates,and im pretty sure that Stan Meyers didnt incorporate Electron extraction into his system because he was just a fool getting over excited about a voltage leak.
you see from the video-at the start im getting 10 amps draw at the end it comes down to about 7.with a 12volts battery thats 120watts at the start and about 85watts when the motor stops.same gas volume.
@HereIsJesus the electricity from the battery ejects electrons from the water molacules, the electrons are then atracted via the negative of the cell to the battery, this is how the joe cell works and why Stan pulsed his units.
1liveandlearn11 6 months ago
Actually you want to contain as many free radical electrons as possible. Electron bombardment increases production.
brokensaber 11 months ago
@brokensaber nope, electron removal is the key, the ionisation increases the electron ejection, google self sputtering beyond threshold, the joe cell simply removes the electons by draining them (best word i can think of) via the negative of a battery, batteries gain in voltage from this. By always leaving the negative on the posative ions atract and the battery contains the ejected electrons giving us an ion posable plama energy.
1liveandlearn11 6 months ago
I can fart methane more than the hydrogen you make all day
deaftodd 1 year ago
less surface area = less production
crafter2u 1 year ago
hey! have you tried titanium in a cell yet? some have discovered a more potent, higher quality gas that impressed even Eric Craig!
heycolslaw 1 year ago
So, what you displaying. You are extracting energy (electrons) to operate the small motor?
Tropicous 2 years ago
i was trying to test the stanley meyer notion of electron exteraction to increase efficiency-later experiments with distilled water show that this is not induction nor is it current leakage-thanx for commenting
m3sca1 2 years ago
you're not making a lot of gas
thats silly
mstaff657 2 years ago
distilled water not silly at all-no electrolyte-the fact it is making gas at all is signifigant
m3sca1 2 years ago
No, Dragonboy34 is wrong.. I am a Physicist-->(close enough) and while saying that an electron is "arbitrary happenstance" he is close, however, in theory, if -it- is "both and neither"
and "both are we and not", it would be safe to assume that this deems us intrinsically the like, and viewable as the like..
Sorry, for the bull shit... look up "fastest laser pulse" Some Swiss dude can map, track, chart, molest and pork electrons in his sleep.. check it out
Major...Out......... (*Xy'
MajorUtah 2 years ago
your getting elctron movement in the stainless from induction.
stage274 3 years ago
its not induction
m3sca1 3 years ago
electrons don't exist, and no, i don't live under a rock. all they're doing is moving a predicted behavior with different charges, that's it.
dragonboy34 3 years ago
pls clarify "electrons dont exist"
m3sca1 3 years ago
well, they have no mass. they behave like a wave and a particle at the same time...they were theorized. no one has been able to specifically 'spot' any electron in any element at any time. orbitals are areas of probability, not locations of these behaviors. if you talk to any good physicist, when you ask them about electrons, they will say, "Electrons don't exist, they're a theory."
dragonboy34 3 years ago
and no im not a physicist, i just was born into a family of physicists and doctors and their friends...i could tell you why 99% of supplements are b.s. though.
dragonboy34 3 years ago
thats ok i was just asking-although it seems the accepted theory has stood up pretty well so far-most of science is applied theory anyway-but then there are always strange things that dont fit to theory.
m3sca1 3 years ago
sweet...i never thought of it that way. right on that part...we've done plenty of experiments that'd make interesting videos...too bad some weren't too safe.
dragonboy34 3 years ago
I know whats happing, your cell is making and electri field, and inducing a current in the the stainless mess.
stage274 3 years ago
Good job, electron extractin is what you want for a more effcient fuel cell. This is what enables the undescoved energy feild to function. some call it 0 point energy, that may be the case but the white powder build up on your cathode is ions(plasma) held stable in a powder form that has supperconducting properties. torch your cathode on scales and it will lose weight then gain it back well cooling. pm if you want more info.
1freedomfighter1 3 years ago
self cancelling bifilar in series with the cap,(fuel cell) is an rc circuit, more less. Myers text info of the bifilar are not self-cancelling as the drawings show.Drawings are wrong.Most ppl build as figs show.which is wrong.
kunadude 3 years ago
i'm sorry my friend but i should say you are realy wrong about the pll on his drawings he show a 4046 pll + 4001 and and opamp wich are very well explained by the drawings i studied many designes of pll before i realised it was correct. take a look at my video...
sebosfato 3 years ago
Its very clear in the body of the text, but 99% of people thumb past all that and go straight to the drawings....Besides, if it were a self-cancelling bifilar, it would be an RC time constant not an LC circuit at all.
People doing it that way are loosing alot of efficiency.
kunadude 3 years ago
correction please, the self-cancelling bifilar connection to the electrodes gives the stair-step effect to the main voltage spike. i tried it both ways and noticed that; also a linear wound bifilar coil did not give that effect, only the pancake wound coil seemed to, perhaps the linear one was too small
esterbrickle 3 years ago
Note: The Meyers Technical brief drawings showing how to connect the Bifilar coils are wrong. Either by mistake or deliberate. They are Tesla style "Aiding" wound Bifilar. NOT self-cancelling wound as many mistakenly build.
kunadude 3 years ago
Funny people continue to discredit Meyers electron extraction idea.....When modern fuel cells that are batteries do exactly this commercially. They are called PEM fuel cells. Only they use a hydrocarbon based fuel to keep you going to the pumps.
kunadude 3 years ago
your losing voltage cause your getting a short.
the plate are touching in the atomic level your water is too conductive..
stay in school!
Ckevinh 3 years ago
my experiments are my school.my latest foray into this subject is with de-mineralised water with absolutley NO electrolyte.
i still get voltage,on an electrode placed 20 cm above the cell plates,and im pretty sure that Stan Meyers didnt incorporate Electron extraction into his system because he was just a fool getting over excited about a voltage leak.
m3sca1 3 years ago
dont bother, he'll never get it.
crob227 3 years ago
yeah your probably right there-but if not for the sake of others i would have just deleted it.=]
m3sca1 3 years ago
How much voltage do you get out ?
8 Volts ?
How much current ?
Please try with a 100 Ohm load resistor and
measure the voltage at it.
What is your supply voltage for the HHO cell ?
How many Watts do you put in to produce HHO gas ?
Many thanks.
Regards, Stefan.
overunitydotcom 3 years ago
yeah 8 volts out-dunno about the current-enough to run the little motor and warm the leads up if no motor in the middle.
supply battery is 12 volts thru PWM battery drill trigger-i will get back to you...
m3sca1 3 years ago
you see from the video-at the start im getting 10 amps draw at the end it comes down to about 7.with a 12volts battery thats 120watts at the start and about 85watts when the motor stops.same gas volume.
m3sca1 3 years ago
Are those bubbles hydrogen? Don't smoke....lol
EOGGasman 3 years ago
yes they are -and no i wont =]
m3sca1 3 years ago
That looks like fun to mess with that stuff. I wish I knew how to do all that! Pretty neat. Love your accent!
PantyMython 3 years ago
fun?yeah this stuff keeps me awake at night =]
i have an accent?=P lol
thanx for dropping by and checkn my latest.
i tried to send you a PM last night but u got that friends lock thing on,so im sending you an invite.
m3sca1 3 years ago
i have seen copper screen think it would work better?
crob227 3 years ago
it would work ok -maybe it would not last so well with electrolytes.but yeah give it a go
m3sca1 3 years ago
or try a stainless cylinder
m3sca1 3 years ago