Added: 3 years ago
From: m3sca1
Views: 17,969
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (30)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @HereIsJesus the electricity from the battery ejects electrons from the water molacules, the electrons are then atracted via the negative of the cell to the battery, this is how the joe cell works and why Stan pulsed his units.

  • Actually you want to contain as many free radical electrons as possible. Electron bombardment increases production.

  • @brokensaber nope, electron removal is the key, the ionisation increases the electron ejection, google self sputtering beyond threshold, the joe cell simply removes the electons by draining them (best word i can think of) via the negative of a battery, batteries gain in voltage from this. By always leaving the negative on the posative ions atract and the battery contains the ejected electrons giving us an ion posable plama energy.

  • I can fart methane more than the hydrogen you make all day

  • less surface area = less production

  • hey! have you tried titanium in a cell yet? some have discovered a more potent, higher quality gas that impressed even Eric Craig!

  • So, what you displaying. You are extracting energy (electrons) to operate the small motor?

  • i was trying to test the stanley meyer notion of electron exteraction to increase efficiency-later experiments with distilled water show that this is not induction nor is it current leakage-thanx for commenting

  • you're not making a lot of gas

    thats silly

  • distilled water not silly at all-no electrolyte-the fact it is making gas at all is signifigant

  • No, Dragonboy34 is wrong.. I am a Physicist-->(close enough) and while saying that an electron is "arbitrary happenstance" he is close, however, in theory, if -it- is "both and neither"

    and "both are we and not", it would be safe to assume that this deems us intrinsically the like, and viewable as the like..

    Sorry, for the bull shit... look up "fastest laser pulse" Some Swiss dude can map, track, chart, molest and pork electrons in his sleep.. check it out

    Major...Out......... (*Xy'

  • your getting elctron movement in the stainless from induction.

  • its not induction

  • electrons don't exist, and no, i don't live under a rock. all they're doing is moving a predicted behavior with different charges, that's it.

  • pls clarify "electrons dont exist"

  • well, they have no mass. they behave like a wave and a particle at the same time...they were theorized. no one has been able to specifically 'spot' any electron in any element at any time. orbitals are areas of probability, not locations of these behaviors. if you talk to any good physicist, when you ask them about electrons, they will say, "Electrons don't exist, they're a theory."

  • and no im not a physicist, i just was born into a family of physicists and doctors and their friends...i could tell you why 99% of supplements are b.s. though.

  • thats ok i was just asking-although it seems the accepted theory has stood up pretty well so far-most of science is applied theory anyway-but then there are always strange things that dont fit to theory.

  • sweet...i never thought of it that way. right on that part...we've done plenty of experiments that'd make interesting videos...too bad some weren't too safe.

  • I know whats happing, your cell is making and electri field, and inducing a current in the the stainless mess.

  • Good job, electron extractin is what you want for a more effcient fuel cell. This is what enables the undescoved energy feild to function. some call it 0 point energy, that may be the case but the white powder build up on your cathode is ions(plasma) held stable in a powder form that has supperconducting properties. torch your cathode on scales and it will lose weight then gain it back well cooling. pm if you want more info.

  • self cancelling bifilar in series with the cap,(fuel cell) is an rc circuit, more less. Myers text info of the bifilar are not self-cancelling as the drawings show.Drawings are wrong.Most ppl build as figs show.which is wrong.

  • i'm sorry my friend but i should say you are realy wrong about  the pll on his drawings he show a 4046 pll + 4001 and and opamp wich are very well explained by the drawings i studied many designes of pll before i realised it was correct. take a look at my video...

  • Its very clear in the body of the text, but 99% of people thumb past all that and go straight to the drawings....Besides, if it were a self-cancelling bifilar, it would be an RC time constant not an LC circuit at all.

    People doing it that way are loosing alot of efficiency.

  • correction please, the self-cancelling bifilar connection to the electrodes gives the stair-step effect to the main voltage spike. i tried it both ways and noticed that; also a linear wound bifilar coil did not give that effect, only the pancake wound coil seemed to, perhaps the linear one was too small

  • Note: The Meyers Technical brief drawings showing how to connect the Bifilar coils are wrong. Either by mistake or deliberate. They are Tesla style "Aiding" wound Bifilar. NOT self-cancelling wound as many mistakenly build.

  • Funny people continue to discredit Meyers electron extraction idea.....When modern fuel cells that are batteries do exactly this commercially. They are called PEM fuel cells. Only they use a hydrocarbon based fuel to keep you going to the pumps.

  • your losing voltage cause your getting a short.

    the plate are touching in the atomic level your water is too conductive..

    stay in school!

  • my experiments are my school.my latest foray into this subject is with de-mineralised water with absolutley NO electrolyte.

    i still get voltage,on an electrode placed 20 cm above the cell plates,and im pretty sure that Stan Meyers didnt incorporate Electron extraction into his system because he was just a fool getting over excited about a voltage leak.

  • dont bother, he'll never get it.

  • yeah your probably right there-but if not for the sake of others i would have just deleted it.=]

  • How much voltage do you get out ?

    8 Volts ?

    How much current ?

    Please try with a 100 Ohm load resistor and

    measure the voltage at it.

    What is your supply voltage for the HHO cell ?

    How many Watts do you put in to produce HHO gas ?

    Many thanks.

    Regards, Stefan.

  • yeah 8 volts out-dunno about the current-enough to run the little motor and warm the leads up if no motor in the middle.

    supply battery is 12 volts thru PWM battery drill trigger-i will get back to you...

  • you see from the video-at the start im getting 10 amps draw at the end it comes down to about 7.with a 12volts battery thats 120watts at the start and about 85watts when the motor stops.same gas volume.

  • Are those bubbles hydrogen? Don't smoke....lol

  • yes they are -and no i wont =]

  • That looks like fun to mess with that stuff. I wish I knew how to do all that! Pretty neat. Love your accent!

  • fun?yeah this stuff keeps me awake at night =]

    i have an accent?=P lol

    thanx for dropping by and checkn my latest.

    i tried to send you a PM last night but u got that friends lock thing on,so im sending you an invite.

  • i have seen copper screen think it would work better?

  • it would work ok -maybe it would not last so well with electrolytes.but yeah give it a go

  • or try a stainless cylinder

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more