HIV / AIDS Dissident David Crowe - Interview - April 2009 (1 of 8)

[mykoolaidtastesfunny]

Google....The Guinea Pig Kids The BBC & The AIDSTruth Mafia

" So, let's just take a look at who is this self appointed bunch at AIDS Truth?

A dozen people who include a graduate student (Ken Witwer), a professor of economics (Nicoli Nattrass), several “HIV/AIDS activists” with no technical credentials (Martin Delaney, Nathan Geffen, Gregg Gonsalves, Richard Jefferys), and a PhD in a non-scientific discipline (Jeanne Bergman)..."

[Hardin9]

I am very doubtful of Dr. Pasteur's theory because there are a whole lot of holes in it. Now as to Dr. Koch's recanting part of his theory, do you have verifiable documentation of that?

[sigtgu]

I respect David Crowe immensely. Thanks for posting this. The sooner people become aware of the HIV-AIDS scam the better.

Big Pharma seems to be losing out on their swine flu/vaccination scam at last. Bird flu didn't work either.

People need to take responsibility for their own health by eating a mostly raw fruit & veg diet which will build up their immune systems.

Check out 30bananasaday site.

[Rasnixful]

Google HIV causes AIDS Koch's postulates fulfilled and the Durban Declaration. Proof that HIV causes AIDS

[andy432009]

I read it, it just says that experts affirm that the virus has been isolate from different tissues and the nodes , blood ... but still it does not prove anything, it's just what "experts say" but some of the dissenters are experts too, and Nobel laureates and they say otherwise but Evidence is not what experts say but what they can prove and subject to peer review including the skeptical ones.

[Hardin9]

I can't see how anyone can make that claim because Dr. Gallo admitted himself that he could not find HIV in more than 40% of so called AIDS patients, Koch's Postulates demands 100%, and I'm not giving Dr. Gallo credit for 0% because he there is no evidence that HIV even exists!

[hadr0n]

@Hardin9 Koch's postulates pre-date the discovery of viruses and Koch himself abandoned the 1st postulate because it doesn't apply to many known diseases. Either that or the influenza virus doesn't cause flu; poliovirus does't cause polio; herpesviruses don't cause herpes; hepatitis A,B,C,D and E don't cause hepatitis.

I wonder why there aren't so many influenza 'rethinkers' or polio 'dissidents?'

Probably because it's blatant anti-science denialism, pure and simple.

[mykoolaidtastesfunny]

@hadr0n So youmust have the primary peer reviewed scintific papers where "L Ron" Gallo demonstrated these proteins....: p17/18, p24/25, p31/32, gp41, p53/55, gp120, and gp160...belon to a unique viral entit an lined it imune problems.

You need to provide Title Date and Journal and itbetter have Galo's nameon it. Gallo is the test kitpatent holder and a virus of mass destrucion was his bright idea.

[GhostInTheShell29]

@hadr0n Since it is true one can have polio viruses or influenza viruses in them without suffering from the disease. Then how comes HIV is the only disease where its presence guarantees the disease. Also since one doesn't need to have the HIV virus to have AIDS doesn't that also fly in the face of science. HIV tests also don't test for the virus they test for the antibody to the virus. So its presence isn't known in HIV/AIDS patients as its never determined if they have the virus or not.

[Hardin9]

There are no scientific references of showing that HIV has been isolated, purified, photographed under an electron microscope, and PROVEN to be pathogenic. None of that criteria has been fulfilled!

There are no photos of viremia, meaning plasma flooded with viruses flowing freely in the blood.

There are no kind of verifiable photographs of so called HIV whatsoever.