@locyka19 i had it, dont know if i still do, quality is video-quality of course and in German but still watchable. Becker at his best vs Sampras at his best, a sight to behold.
Baseliners line these days, well... in my opinion tennis hasn't been worth watching since Becker stopped playing.
Actually, I think Pete would have pretty much the same chances of beating Nadal as Federer in terms of their games (and todays surfaces). Pete's backhand is less whippy than Roger's and I really think the high looping backhand would give him even more trouble. However...Pete's forehand is EXACTLY the type of shot that allows players to beat Nadal. If Pete came out on a good day he could destroy Rafa...but if his forehand was off Nadal would just grind him down. Just my opinion.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Fed is much better...his 5th wimbledon was quite hard! i dont tink sampras would have a chance against nadal..nadal play extremely great only to lose to fed. Nadal shot making was unbelievable, yet Fed was able to win!
i second you opinion i think he is unfortunately a very underated player, if he didnt have to compete with edberg, lendl, wilander, then sampras, courier and agassi he prolly wud have won more grand slams
In my eyes Sampras is the best tennis player ever, even better then Federer, as he dominated in the most competetive era of tennis. Miss ur booming serves Pete.
courts look so wierd without the doubles alleys.
airsoftbuddies50 11 months ago
the best time of tennis ever!!! what a shame this is over...
Dale33333 1 year ago
Boris was so STRONG and moved so well for such a big guy.
cammpinno 1 year ago
This was an amazing match.. one of the best ever. I even bought a booteg of it years ago just to see the whole thing, was worth it.
ncf1 1 year ago
@ncf1 Wow!You have it on..what? Dvd? videotape?
thx
locyka19 1 year ago
@locyka19 i had it, dont know if i still do, quality is video-quality of course and in German but still watchable. Becker at his best vs Sampras at his best, a sight to behold.
Baseliners line these days, well... in my opinion tennis hasn't been worth watching since Becker stopped playing.
ncf1 1 year ago
I would love to see BECKER VS FEDERER!!!!. i know becker is older but still.. love to see it.
paulgrant29 1 year ago
Actually, I think Pete would have pretty much the same chances of beating Nadal as Federer in terms of their games (and todays surfaces). Pete's backhand is less whippy than Roger's and I really think the high looping backhand would give him even more trouble. However...Pete's forehand is EXACTLY the type of shot that allows players to beat Nadal. If Pete came out on a good day he could destroy Rafa...but if his forehand was off Nadal would just grind him down. Just my opinion.
daraemkar 1 year ago
Actually, bloodhak is right. I don't think Sampras would beat Nadal on 2008 grass, whilst Nadal would barely win a game against Pete in the 90's.
89Pleasek 2 years ago
Sampras has no chance against Nadal on grass? WTF are you smoking? Coz I want some of that.
pockings 4 years ago 17
you dont want some of that hes smoking dude. let him smoke it all out lol.
supertrex2 2 years ago
"i dont tink sampras would have a chance against nadal"
on grass? u kidding right?
Nicolas Mahunt one of the the last serve and volley players beat Nadal on Queen's Club
a week b4 wimbledon
do the mat
amar0r 4 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Fed is much better...his 5th wimbledon was quite hard! i dont tink sampras would have a chance against nadal..nadal play extremely great only to lose to fed. Nadal shot making was unbelievable, yet Fed was able to win!
bloodhak 4 years ago
I still think Becker was the best player of his era, 7 Wimbledon Finals !
peterm89 4 years ago 2
i second you opinion i think he is unfortunately a very underated player, if he didnt have to compete with edberg, lendl, wilander, then sampras, courier and agassi he prolly wud have won more grand slams
nizzam1 3 years ago
two titans of tennis at their level best. so much better than federer and whoever.
teflonmagnet 4 years ago 5
... Nadal?
oneunderall 4 years ago
what a player!...what a man!...you're the best, pete...ever! no one can come close to you. you're a class all your own!=)
miwabs 5 years ago 3
Whar a rally and what a player!
Boromir1 5 years ago 2
wat a rally!
frederer 5 years ago 2
In my eyes Sampras is the best tennis player ever, even better then Federer, as he dominated in the most competetive era of tennis. Miss ur booming serves Pete.
adityaga 5 years ago 2
i love pete sampras!!! the best ever!!!
mulder8scully5 5 years ago