WHen a gun explodes like that, it's either too much powder in the load or an obstruction. The former is what happened here. BTW, both the AR/M-16 and AK fill their repective niches excellently.
Appears to be a out of battery, he just cleared a malfuntion prior, I suspect a timing issue. Other causes for such a failure could be soft or defective primer (ak`s use a floating FP), or lack of controlled FA mech, common in early 50`s era AK`s. & mud hut conversion, or parts swaps by unqualified persons. Correctly built AKMs w/ good ammo shouldn`t experience this type of failure .
@Hincesti07 Maybe in your dumb veiw of reality. The gun in the video looks romanian. Most likely youve never owned or handled one. And than youre gonna say, " yeah i have, i have a thousand of them." bullshit. Anyone that has owned one, and has also used the ar platform would have a favorite, but would tell you theyre both good weapons.
@wedvarn Oh here we go again with another punk that plays Russian video war games and thinks the Russian's are super humen hero's to defend their honor !
No I don't own or use AK's and I never what such a useless hunk of inaccurate crap firearm.
Now I have shot Ak's but own one never !
I am a professional Alaskan hunting guide and custom gun builder so before you go on blabber your stupid crap you leaned play Russian video war games you better brush up on guns and gun building.
@Hincesti07 You give yourself too much credit. Because its obvious you dont know shit. Im being objective, with fact. You are just an ignorant, opinionated asshole. I'd like you to take any one of your favorite guns, cram it full of mud and than shoot with it. The Ak is the most influential, most prolific, and overall most reliable gun in exsistence since it entered service in 1949. Thats why youre fucking retarded. Custom gun builder? You probably just take the orange tip off youre airsoft. fag
@wedvarn Oh I see we have another ignorant punk who thinks the Ak is some super cannon make by your super hero Russians from those Russian video war games you've been playing !
I truth the AK is a hunk of inaccurate Russian crap that now only 55 terrorist country's, African Nigger dictators, muslim women and children murdering ass holes country's use !
Even your country is junking those shitty Ak's for modern weapons .
The M4 M16 is now sold to 3x more country's than shitty AK's !
@wedvarn Your blabbering B.S comes directly from the stupid Discovery channel that is only out to gain viewer ratings bashing the U.S and the M16 incorrectly !!!!
I suggest get a real gun your self and lean about guns before attacking a real gun builder as I am .
@Hincesti07 Read my post. I've said that both the AR platform and the AK are both good weapons. Never once did i say otherwise. I would trust my AR just as i would my AK, but that takes two different approaches. I'll trust my AR cause i know how to take care of it properly, and ill trust my AK depending on which ammo its got. As shown in this video. And im not attacking you, but you have failed to show any facts to your claims. But its all a matter of opinion.
Chances are it was the ammo. Probably had a bullet set back too far into the casing and left the factory that way. I've seen a round like this myself, but never fired it, but have heard it can cause a catastrophic explosion. This is why you should always inspect your ammunition.
@H123Gaming Win at what? Accuracy? Nope. Ergonomics? Nope. The AK is more reliable, but it's more reliable than pretty much any rifle. I certainly can't think of a magazine fed, automatic rifle that is more reliable. The AR-15 is plenty reliable, but also excellent in every other aspect. It is a superior weapon to the AK, no question. The AR-15 was decades ahead of it's time. Even today, some idiots can't quite wrap their head around it.
@Nater245689 you can't really say it's superior...that's like comparing iron to brass. It all depends on what you need it to do. If it's more stopping power at shorter ranges, and a gun you rarely have to clean...AK. If it's distance shooting for accuracy, or u need something modular...AR.
@TitanTony407 Yes, you can say it's superior. The "stopping power" of the AK-47 is also greatly exaggerated. The steel cored, M43-type projectiles are very poor performers from the standpoint of terminal effects. The generally don't start to upset until 10" (twice what you'll see with most 5.56mm) or more of penetration and they're not moving fast enough to fragment even at contact distance. Neither the 7.62x39 or 5.56x45mm are terribly lethal rounds.
@Nater245689 all that may be true, however since both rounds aren't "terribly lethal" wouldn't you rather have the larger of the two. Also, you mentioned the 5.56 (NATO)...what about the AR's that are only chambered for the .223 specifically (which most AR platforms are chambered for)...that round is even "less lethal" than the previously stated 5.56x45, correct me if i'm wrong.
@TitanTony407 No, not necessarily. As long as a FMJ 5.56mm projectile is traveling fast enough to fragment after impact, it will do more damage than a 7.62x39. If it's between something like the Yugo M67 (the best performing military 7.62x39 cartridge) and the Mk 318 (the best performing military 5.56x45mm cartridge), I'm taking 5.56. Most ARs are chambered for 5.56mm. I'd say it's at least 3:1 5.56, probably much more.
@Nater245689 The M43 rounds are not really common anymore. Most of ammo made today is of the Lead core type that yaws earlier. On par with a 7.62x51 M80 almost.
@esh325 First and foremost, all rifle rounds will yaw assuming they do not fragment. It's nothing special, it's just physics. The M43 is very common in combat zones. It's relative scarcity is due to legality, not how much is or isn't being produced.
@esh325 M80 is still produced by Lake City and is still the standard US 7.62x51mm round. It probably accounts for 90% of production, although what percentage has been made with a steel jacket versus a copper jacket isn't known to me. There has been some effort to replace the M80 in battle rifle use over the past few years, leading to the Mk 319 Mod 0 but that stuff is expensive and hard to find.
@esh325 Furthermore, the M67 style rounds are in no way on par with the M80. The M67 produces two small stretch cavities, one between 10 and 20cm of penetration and one between 30 and 40cm. The M80 produces one enormous stretch cavity between 15 and 40cm of penetration. If it has a steel jacket, and some does, then you get fragmentation on top of that. It's also far more likely to produce remote wounding effects and much better at penetrating light intermediate barriers.
@Nater245689 The M80 is not known to commonly fragment. It has almost identical performance to WW2 era rifle cartridges like 54R,,303,30/06, etc. The only military loading I know of that is known to fragment is the DAG German rounds. Not very common.
@esh325 You didn't read my post very carefully. Lake City produces two variants of the M80 but doesn't differentiate them by NSN. One has a copper jacket, one has a steel jacket. The latter will fragment, but only at velocities over 2,800fps.
@Nater245689 7.62x54R, .303, and .30-06 had been in use long before WWII. The 7.62x54R and .303 British go back to the last decade of the 19th Century and the .30-06 (obviously) goes back to 1906.
@Nater245689 I've never any gel tests that showed the M80 fragmenting. Even if what you're saying is true, the velocity will be lost very quickly out of most battle rifle length barrels which means it can't be counted on to reliably fragment.
@esh325 Then you obviously haven't read any of Gary Robert's stuff. The fragmentation adds little to the overall wounding effects, but probably enough to be mentioned. The point remains, M67 is not on par with M80.
@Nater245689 I haven't. The stuff I've read is mostly from Martin Fackler. He is a proponent that fragmentation is the most effective way of wounding. How does it add little to the overall wounding effects? Expanding rifle bullets like hollow points rely on fragmentation be lethal I believe. You can't tell that a fragmented bullet in flesh doesn't do much. It makes the overall permeant cavity larger. One can see this easily.
@esh325 Let me make this as clear as I possibly can. The fragmentation of steel jacketed, 150gr, M80 projectiles adds little in the way of wounding effects compared to the copper jacketed, 150gr, M80 projectile. I was talking about the performance of the M80, not any other rifle cartridge.
@Nater245689 Why? You've already said it yourself. The M80 has a mean velocity of 2850fps, the steel jacketed rounds will only fragment above 2800fps. That 50fps will be lost very rapidly if it even exists at all due to the tolerances at which this ammunition is produced. It's a footnote at best. The permanent wound cavity is larger in size, the temporary wound cavity is no larger between the two rounds. It's not the performance difference you see between M193 fragmenting or not.
@esh325 The M67 creates two rather small wound cavities (it manages two rotations). The M80 creates one massive wound cavity. I'd rather not be shot with either one, but the M80 is certainly nastier.
@Nater245689 It's not really an easy thing to tell. All the gel tests for them I see don't measure the size of the permaneant t cavity. I'm not saying you're wrong, you may very well be right.
@esh325 The only intermediate cartridges that I am aware of that have wounding effects equal or superior to the M80 are the 6.5 Grendel and in particular the 6.8 SPC. The Grendel has a lot of problems in AR-type rifles, particularly with extraction. The 6.8 SPC works very well in ARs and really is the premier cartridge for use in both short and long barreled AR-type rifles. If only it weren't so expensive.
@esh325 Wolf is going to make 6.5 Grendel, which doesn't do much for me. The round simply doesn't work well in ARs. The round may work well in AKs, but I don't see a whole lot of use for it in rifles designed for 200m or less where 7.62x39 works fairly well and plentiful.
@Nater245689 I don't know where you heard they don't work well in AR15's. The 6.5 grendel will give the AK more range. The 6.5 grendel pretty much beats most intermediate cartridges out there.
@esh325 It's a common knowledge that they they have feeding and extraction issues in ARs, particularly with extraction. The Improved Rifle Cartridge program that developed the 6.8 SPC started with a round that was very similar to the Grendel. 6.5mm projectile, PPC-style case. They abandoned it because of reliability issues. The Grendel is great on paper, real life is a bit different. It may work well in AKs because of it's lineage, but I don't see the point or need for a precision AK.
@Nater245689 It kind of makes it useless then if it can't feed well in AR15's. The 6.8 spc just doesn't push the evenlope enough. It's only good as a short range cartridge. I think people want more then that. The 6.5 grendel has many purposes.
@esh325 The 6.8 SPC is the ultimate cartridge for AR-type rifles. There is nothing better out there and realistically you're not going to be able to build something better and have it fit within the confines of a STANAG 4179 magazine well. I don't know where this myth about the 6.8 SPC being a CQB round came from, but it's utter crap. The cartridge was developed with the Mk 12 foremost in mind.
@esh325 Assuming a 300m zero. you'd have to dial in an additional 4mils for a target a 600m using the 110gr Hornady BTHP @ 2550fps versus the standard AA52 cartridge. It's not that big of a difference.
@Nater245689 You're right, it's not a big deal. The 7.62x51 has more drop then a 5.56x45 and the 7.62x51 is more prefered for sniping. I still prefer the Grendel, but the 6.8 ain't bad. My only concern is the lack of heavy bullets for the 6.8 SPC though.
@Nater245689 This argument gets old it's like comparing a truck (AK) to a sports car (AR). The AK runs more reliably, hits harder, and is usually cheaper to buy; The AR is lighter, faster, more accurate at 200+ meters, and has better ergonomics. It's blunt force against precision.
@Nater245689 you would choose a fucking tinker toy over an ak-47 HAHAHAH you're fucking funny the ak-47 is alot more accurate than people give it credit to and with all the modern "ak-47s" accuracy is no problem
and what do any give a shit about accuracy in an assault rifle when they are not going to be more than 400 yards from an enemy in which the ak-47 or any other variant can accurately achieve but i guess you get your facts from call of duty ?you don't need guns blazing with an assault rifle to achieve a clean kill
@MrDip02 Your post is pure contradiction. "Who gives a shit about accuracy in an assault rifle" to begin and "You don't need guns blazing with an assault rifle to achieve a clean kill", implying that accuracy is important. The 7.62x39mm starts dropping like a stone beyond 200m, especially beyond 300m. So much for your expert knowledge on firearms.
@Nater245689 are you saying troops are any knowledgeable shooter is to stupid to aim high or adjust the sights if people cared so much about accuracy the military would have dumped the ak-47 years and years ago bullet drop does no mean terrible accuracy it just means more time per shots but one shot from the 7.62x39 will drop anyone like a sack of lead the 5.56 would not even come close (matters where you hit) the ballistic are better with the 5.56 but the 39 packs more of a punch
@MrDip02 Ever heard of a run on sentence? Didn't think so. As far as terminal effects go, 5.56 and x39 are both pretty lacking. With the M43 round in service much the world over, x39 isn't very lethal. It doesn't upset until around 25cm of penetration and then the temporary and permanent stretch cavities are small. Where at typical combat distances, a 5.56mm projectile will fragment, creating a wound far more deadly than 7.62x39mm will.
@Nater245689 wow you're getting so pissy that you have to bring punctuation into an argument you're like most people you start to lose at anything you have to bring something else to make your self feel better about yourself and thats what i basically said the ballistics in the 5.56 are better acts as a hollow point but is not as effective to joints as the 7.62x39 is meant more for penetrating armor or obstacle rather than tissue
and with the fact that weather is a pain with guns the ar-15 is basically the m-16 of Vietnam it's not favored by many people and durability is more important because if you have lots of jams that's a 10 times bigger problem then inaccuracy and even if it's inaccurate anyone would be scared shitless being shot at weather or not they know it's just to hit them and honestly if you dropped your gun in mud i don't think accuracy is a problem the ar-15 would not even think to work after that
@MrDip02 Uh, no, just no. The original problems with the M16 have little or nothing to do with the rifle itself and a lot to do with the DoD's ineffectiveness. The US has been using the M16/M4 in harsh environments for decades. Panama? No problems. Gulf? No problems. Afghanistan? No problems. Iraq again? No problems. I could delve into a very technical discussion of both platforms, but given you're utter ignorance, it'd be completely lost on you.
@Nater245689 the m-16 consisted mostly of plastic parts later on it used metal NO one liked the m16 when it replaces the m14 then later on they found the problems and switched to metal components which then made it more durable but it still has difficulties very less but it is still no the ak-47 of durability which people love and want in a rifle if m-16 (or anything) can reach the durability of the ak-47 and the accuracy of the m-16 then yes it would be more superior
without cleaning it and sand getting caught into the chamber is a big problem to which again they would have have more difficulty working with it but again you probably think that the only time an assault rifle is good is if it keeps sub MOA fully automatic
@MrDip02 I've seen DGI and piston ARs survive open dust cover dirt/debris tests without issues. I've seen AKs fail the same tests when big chunks of gravel bind their fire control. Maybe if you had any ownership experience with either weapon, you'd be able to offer something valuable or at least accurate beyond parroting the same crap that every other non-expert on the errornet does.
@Nater245689 haha sure you have you can fire an ak-47 after dipping it in mud it's been done before adn ar can handle what any other assault rifle can ak-47 can handle more it's the 91/30 of assault rifles
@MrDip02 Dude, you sound like you want to have sex with the AK-47 or something...
I have seen someone shoot an AK-47 once or twice, then it jammed. Unloaded the stoppage and tried again. Three or four shots this time... and this time Mr. AK-47 went bye-bye as it's receiver scattered itself over a wide area.
Real reliability=Rugar 10/22. Best rifle out there. Play around with one that has been going for 20 years with not one jam. Not ever. Plus, it's deadly and accurate. Again, the best.
@MrDip02 Yeah. What's that got to do with the price of mince? The guy claimed it was a Soviet-manufactured AK-47 (whether he was lying or misinformed or whatever else isn't my fault: I'm just repeating what the guy said). Still, it malfunctioned.
@naedanger123 and EVERY gun jams it's impossible for one to not to -_- just some are harder than others to jam and the 10/22 is just like any other semi auto rifle since people are not stupid enough to go crawling in mud and dirt with it the only jamming it will do is from the extractor
@MrDip02 Funny, because the guy has done several dirt tests on it. Worked fine. Like I said, not one jam in 20 years. God knows how the guy did it, but he made a purchase that only happens to the REALLY lucky ones. It's reliability sure beat the AK-47 in tests as well.
@Nater245689 lol yup that happened to me, a rock got behind the shepards hook, but if i tapped the trigger it reset and went bang no problem. they are great rifles, if you get one thats built well. and i can hit a pie plate at 200 yards semi rapidly. aks are plenty accurate. so theres some non parroting info to brighten your day :P
accuracy is a good thing but it is not the only reason it makes a firearm good the only thing it has in advantage is (round,weight,accuracy) ak-47 still has that but it is not like it's going to be as accurate and if you are a good shot then it should not be a problem and like you said its mainly the bullet change that and it loosens it up a bit
@MrDip02 This makes zero sense. Being a "good shot" has nothing to do with a rifle's inherent accuracy. Being a "good shot" can't make up for deficiencies in a cartridge. Being a "good shot" has nothing to do with the technical merits of a platform and is thus irrelevant.
@Nater245689 you're retarded do you think a marksman is a marksman because of the gun no its the person behind the gun look do you think a kid that has never shoot a gun can hit a plate at 300 yards with an ak-47 over a man that has spent 30 years of his life in the military if you think that theres something wrong with you
@MrDip02 You need to learn how to properly format sentences in the English language. It's not just the lack of punctuation, syntax and everything else is screwed up. Of course the shooter is the most important aspect in accuracy, but designs inherent in particular weapons systems impact accuracy as well. You can't make an AK as accurate as you can make an AR, for example.
@Nater245689 and only a douche will bring up punctuation OVER the internet, does not prove anything but the fact that you're a little bitch and can't use anything in an argument besides punctuation and such and of course the weapon system for the ak-47 is less accurate but there are more than one variant of the the AK than just ak-47
@1019129114 the ak-47 is actually more prone to jamming in sandy areas due to how open the gun is. it can, but not always, jam because it takes in to much sand. its open lose mechanism is actualyl a disadvantage to certain degrees. in water it wont jam (generally weapons dont jam in water they explode) because its lose. if small amounts of dirt, sand etc. get in it will be fine. but a rock or two or too much sand or dirt and it will have a feeding failure leading it to jam.
@MattieTheBear ohh ya ya i feel ya that makes sense actually i guess in the 70s it was seen as superior and if i was going into combat id use an ak for the stopping power but im not going to fight anyone overseas or on my homeland at least not for a while i dunno if id want the ak now aa12 is next best decision then
@1019129114 if you want a nice reliable gun, now im speaking in terms of generally more reliable than an AR15. get an AK-74. the 5.45.39 is 5.56/.223 in steroids. it has general AK reliability but more updated. 5.45/39 is accurate and tumbles and yaws more when it hits a soft target, more than the 556/223. id recomend the polish bulgarian or hungarian ones. if you can afford it get the arsenal variant.
@MattieTheBear yeah ar15 wouldnt be my first choice i dont think any american gun other then aa12 or the 1911 would be my first choice weapons ak is the most reaistic n yeah 5.45 or 7.62 either one of those would be satisfying yeah one from the eastern asia where it orignated would b the best quality and probrobly way cheaper then in the US
@LegendofHogger Which H&K are we talking about it? It's all relative really depending on how overpressured or underpressured the rounds was, etc. There's lots of factor. Hard to say really which would be better.
@LegendofHogger It could have been a squib round. A H&K will blow up too if it's exposed to a squib. And besides we don't know anything about the condition of this rifle. It could have been mistreated.
@MrBsct It's not Chinese this one in the video. The Chinese rifles are quite well made actually. Every gun malfunctions, but the AK will do it less then most comparable assault rifles.
@horrormonger sorry ma'am didnt mean to offend you! chinese aks arent crap. but by you earlier statment i can already tell you dont shoot AKs much so its not gunna be worth my time to sit here and argue with a little girl! have a nice day ma'am!
My money is on a split-neck from 50 year old ammo that was sitting below a leak in a damp warehouse that the Russians sold to the Iraqi Army for 5 dollars a crate.
Probably some shitty knock off of a knock off of a legit AKM from Romania. I would seriously trust an M1 Garand or Kar 98K found in a cache than an AK from a bazaar. Sure, they both might have shot out barrels, but they won't be Avtomat Knockovas.
In short, get the right ammo and get an authentic AK.
@noahboa13000 Even with noncorrosive ammunition, when any firearm is exposed to the elements, wether it be dirt, dust or anything really outside, it requires cleaning. Now, the Ak- 47 is quite the exception because it can withstand alot of damage and exposure without being cleaned and still function properly, but due to the engineering of the firearm, it still must be cleaned to ensure a 100% success rate upon discharge of the firearm.
@suddenlyill Well, if you buy illegitimate ammunition, then that is your fault for not properly inspecting the ammunition, and you cannot blame such a mistake on a firearm.
@hjkentproductions That's an obvious given. This is more of a warning to new shooters: because 7.62 x 39 and 5.56 are the most common carriages fired, they're also more likely to be bought on a budget, ie Russian ammo.
@hjkentproductions Russian Tula FMJ, 20rnd: $4.99, Golden Bear Russian 125 Grain Soft Point $8.19, Federal American Eagle 124 FMJ: $17.49, Fiocchi 123 Gn FMJ: $10.29. What would you call it?
@suddenlyill typically russian ammunition is extremely reliable, and budget usually classifies its target nouns as "Cheap and irreliable", Russian ammo is cheap AND reliable. At least most.
@hjkentproductions Depends on the company. I've gotten so many bad primers with tula and wolf 7.62x39. Not to mention the bullet diameters are inconsistent and it's dirty. I would never trust my life to my ammo. Golden tiger and Brown bear are a lot better on the other hand.
@esh325 Oh lord, DONT EVER USE WOLF. Common sense right there. A complete Retard at the range the other day was shooting .380 with a box of wolf ammo. Jammed on him countless times, and he CLEARLY wasnt proficient on how to unjam a firearm. -_____-
@hjkentproductions Wolf and Tula are only good as plinking ammo, not serious use. I imagine it was jam that could be easily cleared with a tap out of the magazine and racking of the slide. A good .380 should feed wolf.
@suddenlyill Yeah, and a guarantee you that Golden Bear will out shoot the Federal. Granted, I am more partial to S&B and Prvi Partisan myself. Prvi is on par with every American ammunition maker for half the price and S&B WILL out shoot just about anything other than Fiocchi match and other premium loads Lapua.
If you haven't shot any S&B(it's rather scarce atm) pick yourself up a box if you don't believe me. It makes Winchester Whitebox look like Monarch!
@Elementlmage Yeah, those rounds are good. I'm not saying American ammo is the cream of the crop, just pointing out that some Russian ammo lack standards. Tula is especially bad, a few bad experiences with rims breaking off, leaving the cartridge stuck in the rifle.
@suddenlyill I have put over 2,000 Prvi Partisan, 1,200 Tula rounds, 400 Federal Eagle, 200 Golden Bear (decent) and 30 of that Brown Bear (crap) through my Yugo M70 and there is simply no comparison..The Serbian ammo is vastly superior in every category. Not condemning Russian ammo, but their commercial loads need allot of work to be considered anything but bargain bin practice ammo IMO. Federal Eagle and Golden Bear has been 100% reliable but is less accurate than the Prvi in MY gun,
Just the dust cover blew up probably from a faulty round maybe it was filled to the max with powder the extractor and dust cover were probably damaged and could easily be replaced
after seeing this it kinda makes me not want to shoot my ak i have a semi auto wasr gp 10/63 ak 47 n the weird thing is when i slide the bolt carrier to load in a round back like it gets kind of stuck it only happens if i pull the slide like a wussy 0__o wtf does anyone know whats wrong???
@thepoopstinks1 because AK's arent meant to be wracked slowly. but since you have a wasr you might wanna do a break in of either shooting about 100-150 rounds. or sit there and wrack the slide about 100 times. dont pull back and then let it go forward slowly, pull back and let it go forward on its own spring tension.
@thepoopstinks I've had that problem its because the hammer is binding on the carrier, if you pick up a new FCG, it will fix the problem (at least it did for me)
THIS IS WHAT HAPPENS WHEN U BUY A PEACE OF SHIT STAMPED AK INSTEAD OF A MILLED AK LIKE THEY WERE INTENDED STAMPED$ 400 = JUNK MILLED COST ABOUT $1000 AND LAST FOREVER
@ryspace That was obviously and out of battery detonation. Those things are never good and you should expect at least the magazine to be warped. I'd bet that receiver cover will not fit back on it, and the extractor might be trashed. It's probably not worth it to get it fixed.
99.9% of the time
sk8terboy309 4 weeks ago
0:28 "Look at that!"
WOW NICE SHOES
TT01Fanatic 1 month ago
These are the guys they left in charge in Iraq! LMAO!
wyominglost 1 month ago in playlist Fire Arms Whoops!
Wow. 10-22? What's next? Take over the world with airsofts? Ha ha. I love my AKs.
ranjah76 2 months ago
ammo ammo ammo!
zrili 3 months ago
WHen a gun explodes like that, it's either too much powder in the load or an obstruction. The former is what happened here. BTW, both the AR/M-16 and AK fill their repective niches excellently.
denrizza 4 months ago
Fuck your Ar-15 i will counter with an AEK-971 now explain that one to me bastards
SecretSpetsnaz 4 months ago
Should have bought an AR15- Eugene Stoner
gbmcy 4 months ago
I was wondering why I had a left over screw when I reassembled it.
nibbler125 4 months ago
Appears to be a out of battery, he just cleared a malfuntion prior, I suspect a timing issue. Other causes for such a failure could be soft or defective primer (ak`s use a floating FP), or lack of controlled FA mech, common in early 50`s era AK`s. & mud hut conversion, or parts swaps by unqualified persons. Correctly built AKMs w/ good ammo shouldn`t experience this type of failure .
88byrdboyy 4 months ago
overpaid murderers
aklane666 4 months ago
True to Russian made crap !
Russian can't even make a tiolet that works !
Hincesti07 4 months ago
@Hincesti07 That gun wasnt made in russia.
wedvarn 4 months ago
@wedvarn How do you know that ?
I didn't you their in this video !
AK is an AK a total hunk of shit from Russia made for crimials and low gene pool morons !
Hincesti07 4 months ago
@Hincesti07 Maybe in your dumb veiw of reality. The gun in the video looks romanian. Most likely youve never owned or handled one. And than youre gonna say, " yeah i have, i have a thousand of them." bullshit. Anyone that has owned one, and has also used the ar platform would have a favorite, but would tell you theyre both good weapons.
wedvarn 4 months ago
@wedvarn Oh here we go again with another punk that plays Russian video war games and thinks the Russian's are super humen hero's to defend their honor !
No I don't own or use AK's and I never what such a useless hunk of inaccurate crap firearm.
Now I have shot Ak's but own one never !
I am a professional Alaskan hunting guide and custom gun builder so before you go on blabber your stupid crap you leaned play Russian video war games you better brush up on guns and gun building.
Hincesti07 4 months ago
@Hincesti07 You give yourself too much credit. Because its obvious you dont know shit. Im being objective, with fact. You are just an ignorant, opinionated asshole. I'd like you to take any one of your favorite guns, cram it full of mud and than shoot with it. The Ak is the most influential, most prolific, and overall most reliable gun in exsistence since it entered service in 1949. Thats why youre fucking retarded. Custom gun builder? You probably just take the orange tip off youre airsoft. fag
wedvarn 4 months ago
@wedvarn Oh I see we have another ignorant punk who thinks the Ak is some super cannon make by your super hero Russians from those Russian video war games you've been playing !
I truth the AK is a hunk of inaccurate Russian crap that now only 55 terrorist country's, African Nigger dictators, muslim women and children murdering ass holes country's use !
Even your country is junking those shitty Ak's for modern weapons .
The M4 M16 is now sold to 3x more country's than shitty AK's !
Hincesti07 4 months ago
@wedvarn Your blabbering B.S comes directly from the stupid Discovery channel that is only out to gain viewer ratings bashing the U.S and the M16 incorrectly !!!!
I suggest get a real gun your self and lean about guns before attacking a real gun builder as I am .
Hincesti07 4 months ago
@Hincesti07 Read my post. I've said that both the AR platform and the AK are both good weapons. Never once did i say otherwise. I would trust my AR just as i would my AK, but that takes two different approaches. I'll trust my AR cause i know how to take care of it properly, and ill trust my AK depending on which ammo its got. As shown in this video. And im not attacking you, but you have failed to show any facts to your claims. But its all a matter of opinion.
wedvarn 4 months ago
it is MPI-KMS not AK, goddamit!!!!!!
nikstefonov 4 months ago
or it's just got one million shots.
ssm80taurus 4 months ago
Looks like his auto sear was out of time..
tyrantable 5 months ago
Chances are it was the ammo. Probably had a bullet set back too far into the casing and left the factory that way. I've seen a round like this myself, but never fired it, but have heard it can cause a catastrophic explosion. This is why you should always inspect your ammunition.
bigstabby 5 months ago
Squib round
jasonfish07 5 months ago
was it the rifle or the ammo?
modex20 5 months ago
Stupid fucking video
fair66115 5 months ago
chinese ammo = crap
232Omar232 5 months ago
Fuck the AR or AK fighting do like I and buy both n shut the fuck up
WaterfrontBoss 5 months ago
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!! XD
oscarthelame 5 months ago
people say "oh ya, ar15's suck and ak's rock,,,,,, WELL IN YO FACE!!!!!!
flyinbryan1619 5 months ago
@flyinbryan1619 I can guarantee if you put an AR15, against an AK47, the AK47 would win.
H123Gaming 5 months ago
@H123Gaming In what, collateral damage? jk :)
JonMan347 5 months ago
@H123Gaming Win at what? Accuracy? Nope. Ergonomics? Nope. The AK is more reliable, but it's more reliable than pretty much any rifle. I certainly can't think of a magazine fed, automatic rifle that is more reliable. The AR-15 is plenty reliable, but also excellent in every other aspect. It is a superior weapon to the AK, no question. The AR-15 was decades ahead of it's time. Even today, some idiots can't quite wrap their head around it.
Nater245689 5 months ago 5
@Nater245689 you can't really say it's superior...that's like comparing iron to brass. It all depends on what you need it to do. If it's more stopping power at shorter ranges, and a gun you rarely have to clean...AK. If it's distance shooting for accuracy, or u need something modular...AR.
TitanTony407 5 months ago
@TitanTony407 Yes, you can say it's superior. The "stopping power" of the AK-47 is also greatly exaggerated. The steel cored, M43-type projectiles are very poor performers from the standpoint of terminal effects. The generally don't start to upset until 10" (twice what you'll see with most 5.56mm) or more of penetration and they're not moving fast enough to fragment even at contact distance. Neither the 7.62x39 or 5.56x45mm are terribly lethal rounds.
Nater245689 5 months ago
@Nater245689 all that may be true, however since both rounds aren't "terribly lethal" wouldn't you rather have the larger of the two. Also, you mentioned the 5.56 (NATO)...what about the AR's that are only chambered for the .223 specifically (which most AR platforms are chambered for)...that round is even "less lethal" than the previously stated 5.56x45, correct me if i'm wrong.
TitanTony407 5 months ago
@TitanTony407 No, not necessarily. As long as a FMJ 5.56mm projectile is traveling fast enough to fragment after impact, it will do more damage than a 7.62x39. If it's between something like the Yugo M67 (the best performing military 7.62x39 cartridge) and the Mk 318 (the best performing military 5.56x45mm cartridge), I'm taking 5.56. Most ARs are chambered for 5.56mm. I'd say it's at least 3:1 5.56, probably much more.
Nater245689 5 months ago
@Nater245689 The M43 rounds are not really common anymore. Most of ammo made today is of the Lead core type that yaws earlier. On par with a 7.62x51 M80 almost.
esh325 4 months ago
@esh325 First and foremost, all rifle rounds will yaw assuming they do not fragment. It's nothing special, it's just physics. The M43 is very common in combat zones. It's relative scarcity is due to legality, not how much is or isn't being produced.
Nater245689 4 months ago
@Nater245689 Yeah, it's old left over stuff. Never said they didn't yaw.
esh325 4 months ago
@esh325 M80 is still produced by Lake City and is still the standard US 7.62x51mm round. It probably accounts for 90% of production, although what percentage has been made with a steel jacket versus a copper jacket isn't known to me. There has been some effort to replace the M80 in battle rifle use over the past few years, leading to the Mk 319 Mod 0 but that stuff is expensive and hard to find.
Nater245689 4 months ago
@esh325 Furthermore, the M67 style rounds are in no way on par with the M80. The M67 produces two small stretch cavities, one between 10 and 20cm of penetration and one between 30 and 40cm. The M80 produces one enormous stretch cavity between 15 and 40cm of penetration. If it has a steel jacket, and some does, then you get fragmentation on top of that. It's also far more likely to produce remote wounding effects and much better at penetrating light intermediate barriers.
Nater245689 4 months ago
@Nater245689 The M80 is not known to commonly fragment. It has almost identical performance to WW2 era rifle cartridges like 54R,,303,30/06, etc. The only military loading I know of that is known to fragment is the DAG German rounds. Not very common.
esh325 4 months ago
@esh325 You didn't read my post very carefully. Lake City produces two variants of the M80 but doesn't differentiate them by NSN. One has a copper jacket, one has a steel jacket. The latter will fragment, but only at velocities over 2,800fps.
Nater245689 4 months ago
@Nater245689 7.62x54R, .303, and .30-06 had been in use long before WWII. The 7.62x54R and .303 British go back to the last decade of the 19th Century and the .30-06 (obviously) goes back to 1906.
Nater245689 4 months ago
@Nater245689 Being shot out of most battle rifles, they'll most likely go below 2800 feet per second at 100 yards.
esh325 4 months ago
@esh325 Yes.
Nater245689 4 months ago
@Nater245689 I've never any gel tests that showed the M80 fragmenting. Even if what you're saying is true, the velocity will be lost very quickly out of most battle rifle length barrels which means it can't be counted on to reliably fragment.
esh325 4 months ago
@esh325 Then you obviously haven't read any of Gary Robert's stuff. The fragmentation adds little to the overall wounding effects, but probably enough to be mentioned. The point remains, M67 is not on par with M80.
Nater245689 4 months ago
@Nater245689 I haven't. The stuff I've read is mostly from Martin Fackler. He is a proponent that fragmentation is the most effective way of wounding. How does it add little to the overall wounding effects? Expanding rifle bullets like hollow points rely on fragmentation be lethal I believe. You can't tell that a fragmented bullet in flesh doesn't do much. It makes the overall permeant cavity larger. One can see this easily.
esh325 4 months ago
@esh325 Let me make this as clear as I possibly can. The fragmentation of steel jacketed, 150gr, M80 projectiles adds little in the way of wounding effects compared to the copper jacketed, 150gr, M80 projectile. I was talking about the performance of the M80, not any other rifle cartridge.
Nater245689 4 months ago
@Nater245689 Why? You've already said it yourself. The M80 has a mean velocity of 2850fps, the steel jacketed rounds will only fragment above 2800fps. That 50fps will be lost very rapidly if it even exists at all due to the tolerances at which this ammunition is produced. It's a footnote at best. The permanent wound cavity is larger in size, the temporary wound cavity is no larger between the two rounds. It's not the performance difference you see between M193 fragmenting or not.
Nater245689 4 months ago
@Nater245689 Okay then, back on my point of the M67 perform similar to that of the M80 or perhaps better.
" A Yugoslavian 7.62x39mm round began tumbling at 9cm and finished tumbling at 33cm."
"7.62x51 NATO Spitzer rounds began to tumble at 16cm and finished at 35cm." The earlier yawing of the M67 probably leads to a bit more tissue damage.
esh325 4 months ago
@esh325 The M67 creates two rather small wound cavities (it manages two rotations). The M80 creates one massive wound cavity. I'd rather not be shot with either one, but the M80 is certainly nastier.
Nater245689 4 months ago
@Nater245689 It's not really an easy thing to tell. All the gel tests for them I see don't measure the size of the permaneant t cavity. I'm not saying you're wrong, you may very well be right.
esh325 4 months ago
@esh325 The only intermediate cartridges that I am aware of that have wounding effects equal or superior to the M80 are the 6.5 Grendel and in particular the 6.8 SPC. The Grendel has a lot of problems in AR-type rifles, particularly with extraction. The 6.8 SPC works very well in ARs and really is the premier cartridge for use in both short and long barreled AR-type rifles. If only it weren't so expensive.
Nater245689 4 months ago
@Nater245689 The ammo might become cheap soon enough. Wolf is going to import a batch comparable to the price of .223 steel case from what I read.
esh325 4 months ago
@esh325 Wolf is going to make 6.5 Grendel, which doesn't do much for me. The round simply doesn't work well in ARs. The round may work well in AKs, but I don't see a whole lot of use for it in rifles designed for 200m or less where 7.62x39 works fairly well and plentiful.
Nater245689 4 months ago
@Nater245689 I don't know where you heard they don't work well in AR15's. The 6.5 grendel will give the AK more range. The 6.5 grendel pretty much beats most intermediate cartridges out there.
esh325 4 months ago
@esh325 It's a common knowledge that they they have feeding and extraction issues in ARs, particularly with extraction. The Improved Rifle Cartridge program that developed the 6.8 SPC started with a round that was very similar to the Grendel. 6.5mm projectile, PPC-style case. They abandoned it because of reliability issues. The Grendel is great on paper, real life is a bit different. It may work well in AKs because of it's lineage, but I don't see the point or need for a precision AK.
Nater245689 4 months ago
@Nater245689 It kind of makes it useless then if it can't feed well in AR15's. The 6.8 spc just doesn't push the evenlope enough. It's only good as a short range cartridge. I think people want more then that. The 6.5 grendel has many purposes.
esh325 4 months ago
@esh325 The 6.8 SPC is the ultimate cartridge for AR-type rifles. There is nothing better out there and realistically you're not going to be able to build something better and have it fit within the confines of a STANAG 4179 magazine well. I don't know where this myth about the 6.8 SPC being a CQB round came from, but it's utter crap. The cartridge was developed with the Mk 12 foremost in mind.
Nater245689 4 months ago
@Nater245689 It drops more then a .223. Bullet weight seems to be limited.
esh325 4 months ago
@esh325 Your point?
Nater245689 4 months ago
@Nater245689 More drop makes it harder to hit things.
esh325 4 months ago
@esh325 Assuming a 300m zero. you'd have to dial in an additional 4mils for a target a 600m using the 110gr Hornady BTHP @ 2550fps versus the standard AA52 cartridge. It's not that big of a difference.
Nater245689 4 months ago
@Nater245689 You're right, it's not a big deal. The 7.62x51 has more drop then a 5.56x45 and the 7.62x51 is more prefered for sniping. I still prefer the Grendel, but the 6.8 ain't bad. My only concern is the lack of heavy bullets for the 6.8 SPC though.
esh325 4 months ago
@esh325 only if you use kentucky windage...
danthman114 4 months ago
@Nater245689 This argument gets old it's like comparing a truck (AK) to a sports car (AR). The AK runs more reliably, hits harder, and is usually cheaper to buy; The AR is lighter, faster, more accurate at 200+ meters, and has better ergonomics. It's blunt force against precision.
DanielJosephTV 3 months ago
@Nater245689 you would choose a fucking tinker toy over an ak-47 HAHAHAH you're fucking funny the ak-47 is alot more accurate than people give it credit to and with all the modern "ak-47s" accuracy is no problem
MrDip02 3 months ago
and what do any give a shit about accuracy in an assault rifle when they are not going to be more than 400 yards from an enemy in which the ak-47 or any other variant can accurately achieve but i guess you get your facts from call of duty ?you don't need guns blazing with an assault rifle to achieve a clean kill
MrDip02 3 months ago
@MrDip02 Your post is pure contradiction. "Who gives a shit about accuracy in an assault rifle" to begin and "You don't need guns blazing with an assault rifle to achieve a clean kill", implying that accuracy is important. The 7.62x39mm starts dropping like a stone beyond 200m, especially beyond 300m. So much for your expert knowledge on firearms.
Nater245689 3 months ago
@Nater245689 are you saying troops are any knowledgeable shooter is to stupid to aim high or adjust the sights if people cared so much about accuracy the military would have dumped the ak-47 years and years ago bullet drop does no mean terrible accuracy it just means more time per shots but one shot from the 7.62x39 will drop anyone like a sack of lead the 5.56 would not even come close (matters where you hit) the ballistic are better with the 5.56 but the 39 packs more of a punch
MrDip02 3 months ago
@MrDip02 Ever heard of a run on sentence? Didn't think so. As far as terminal effects go, 5.56 and x39 are both pretty lacking. With the M43 round in service much the world over, x39 isn't very lethal. It doesn't upset until around 25cm of penetration and then the temporary and permanent stretch cavities are small. Where at typical combat distances, a 5.56mm projectile will fragment, creating a wound far more deadly than 7.62x39mm will.
Nater245689 3 months ago
@Nater245689 wow you're getting so pissy that you have to bring punctuation into an argument you're like most people you start to lose at anything you have to bring something else to make your self feel better about yourself and thats what i basically said the ballistics in the 5.56 are better acts as a hollow point but is not as effective to joints as the 7.62x39 is meant more for penetrating armor or obstacle rather than tissue
MrDip02 3 months ago
@MrDip02 Like call of duty? Sorry, but your posts border on unreadable.
Nater245689 3 months ago
@Nater245689 wow you're so mentally challenged you can't read without functions yet you do it every and are understanding everything i say?
MrDip02 3 months ago
and with the fact that weather is a pain with guns the ar-15 is basically the m-16 of Vietnam it's not favored by many people and durability is more important because if you have lots of jams that's a 10 times bigger problem then inaccuracy and even if it's inaccurate anyone would be scared shitless being shot at weather or not they know it's just to hit them and honestly if you dropped your gun in mud i don't think accuracy is a problem the ar-15 would not even think to work after that
MrDip02 3 months ago
@MrDip02 Uh, no, just no. The original problems with the M16 have little or nothing to do with the rifle itself and a lot to do with the DoD's ineffectiveness. The US has been using the M16/M4 in harsh environments for decades. Panama? No problems. Gulf? No problems. Afghanistan? No problems. Iraq again? No problems. I could delve into a very technical discussion of both platforms, but given you're utter ignorance, it'd be completely lost on you.
Nater245689 3 months ago
@Nater245689 the m-16 consisted mostly of plastic parts later on it used metal NO one liked the m16 when it replaces the m14 then later on they found the problems and switched to metal components which then made it more durable but it still has difficulties very less but it is still no the ak-47 of durability which people love and want in a rifle if m-16 (or anything) can reach the durability of the ak-47 and the accuracy of the m-16 then yes it would be more superior
MrDip02 3 months ago
without cleaning it and sand getting caught into the chamber is a big problem to which again they would have have more difficulty working with it but again you probably think that the only time an assault rifle is good is if it keeps sub MOA fully automatic
MrDip02 3 months ago
@MrDip02 I've seen DGI and piston ARs survive open dust cover dirt/debris tests without issues. I've seen AKs fail the same tests when big chunks of gravel bind their fire control. Maybe if you had any ownership experience with either weapon, you'd be able to offer something valuable or at least accurate beyond parroting the same crap that every other non-expert on the errornet does.
Nater245689 3 months ago
@Nater245689 haha sure you have you can fire an ak-47 after dipping it in mud it's been done before adn ar can handle what any other assault rifle can ak-47 can handle more it's the 91/30 of assault rifles
MrDip02 3 months ago
@MrDip02 Dude, you sound like you want to have sex with the AK-47 or something...
I have seen someone shoot an AK-47 once or twice, then it jammed. Unloaded the stoppage and tried again. Three or four shots this time... and this time Mr. AK-47 went bye-bye as it's receiver scattered itself over a wide area.
Real reliability=Rugar 10/22. Best rifle out there. Play around with one that has been going for 20 years with not one jam. Not ever. Plus, it's deadly and accurate. Again, the best.
naedanger123 2 months ago in playlist Liked videos
@naedanger123 you do know that are different variants of ak-47's that are more than russian
MrDip02 2 months ago
@MrDip02 Yeah. What's that got to do with the price of mince? The guy claimed it was a Soviet-manufactured AK-47 (whether he was lying or misinformed or whatever else isn't my fault: I'm just repeating what the guy said). Still, it malfunctioned.
All guns malfunction. Get used to it.
naedanger123 2 months ago
@naedanger123 and EVERY gun jams it's impossible for one to not to -_- just some are harder than others to jam and the 10/22 is just like any other semi auto rifle since people are not stupid enough to go crawling in mud and dirt with it the only jamming it will do is from the extractor
MrDip02 2 months ago
@MrDip02 Funny, because the guy has done several dirt tests on it. Worked fine. Like I said, not one jam in 20 years. God knows how the guy did it, but he made a purchase that only happens to the REALLY lucky ones. It's reliability sure beat the AK-47 in tests as well.
naedanger123 2 months ago
@Nater245689 lol yup that happened to me, a rock got behind the shepards hook, but if i tapped the trigger it reset and went bang no problem. they are great rifles, if you get one thats built well. and i can hit a pie plate at 200 yards semi rapidly. aks are plenty accurate. so theres some non parroting info to brighten your day :P
yourredcomrade717 2 months ago
accuracy is a good thing but it is not the only reason it makes a firearm good the only thing it has in advantage is (round,weight,accuracy) ak-47 still has that but it is not like it's going to be as accurate and if you are a good shot then it should not be a problem and like you said its mainly the bullet change that and it loosens it up a bit
MrDip02 3 months ago
@MrDip02 This makes zero sense. Being a "good shot" has nothing to do with a rifle's inherent accuracy. Being a "good shot" can't make up for deficiencies in a cartridge. Being a "good shot" has nothing to do with the technical merits of a platform and is thus irrelevant.
Nater245689 3 months ago
@Nater245689 you're retarded do you think a marksman is a marksman because of the gun no its the person behind the gun look do you think a kid that has never shoot a gun can hit a plate at 300 yards with an ak-47 over a man that has spent 30 years of his life in the military if you think that theres something wrong with you
MrDip02 3 months ago
@MrDip02 You need to learn how to properly format sentences in the English language. It's not just the lack of punctuation, syntax and everything else is screwed up. Of course the shooter is the most important aspect in accuracy, but designs inherent in particular weapons systems impact accuracy as well. You can't make an AK as accurate as you can make an AR, for example.
Nater245689 2 months ago
Comment removed
MrDip02 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Nater245689 and only a douche will bring up punctuation OVER the internet, does not prove anything but the fact that you're a little bitch and can't use anything in an argument besides punctuation and such and of course the weapon system for the ak-47 is less accurate but there are more than one variant of the the AK than just ak-47
MrDip02 2 months ago
@flyinbryan1619
every gun misfires onces in a while. happens.
as for what is the best gun, depends on the situation .. 1 thing is for sure.. bullets are bullets and they WILL kill.
arthuro13 5 months ago
the ak never jams even in sand and water the only way this weapon falters it wen it explodes
1019129114 5 months ago
@1019129114 the ak-47 is actually more prone to jamming in sandy areas due to how open the gun is. it can, but not always, jam because it takes in to much sand. its open lose mechanism is actualyl a disadvantage to certain degrees. in water it wont jam (generally weapons dont jam in water they explode) because its lose. if small amounts of dirt, sand etc. get in it will be fine. but a rock or two or too much sand or dirt and it will have a feeding failure leading it to jam.
MattieTheBear 5 months ago
@MattieTheBear ohh ya ya i feel ya that makes sense actually i guess in the 70s it was seen as superior and if i was going into combat id use an ak for the stopping power but im not going to fight anyone overseas or on my homeland at least not for a while i dunno if id want the ak now aa12 is next best decision then
1019129114 5 months ago
@1019129114 if you want a nice reliable gun, now im speaking in terms of generally more reliable than an AR15. get an AK-74. the 5.45.39 is 5.56/.223 in steroids. it has general AK reliability but more updated. 5.45/39 is accurate and tumbles and yaws more when it hits a soft target, more than the 556/223. id recomend the polish bulgarian or hungarian ones. if you can afford it get the arsenal variant.
MattieTheBear 5 months ago
@MattieTheBear yeah ar15 wouldnt be my first choice i dont think any american gun other then aa12 or the 1911 would be my first choice weapons ak is the most reaistic n yeah 5.45 or 7.62 either one of those would be satisfying yeah one from the eastern asia where it orignated would b the best quality and probrobly way cheaper then in the US
1019129114 5 months ago
@LegendofHogger Which H&K are we talking about it? It's all relative really depending on how overpressured or underpressured the rounds was, etc. There's lots of factor. Hard to say really which would be better.
esh325 6 months ago
@LegendofHogger It could have been a squib round. A H&K will blow up too if it's exposed to a squib. And besides we don't know anything about the condition of this rifle. It could have been mistreated.
esh325 6 months ago
looks like the top cover just blew off what else was wrong with it after that happened?
theunsuspecting 6 months ago
Like how the cameraman checks on the rifle before the dudes face. Such a good battle buddy
scuds03 6 months ago
Operation Eldest Son...still in effect
AlfonsoEastBay 6 months ago
cartrige blew up in reciever
not aks fault
GunloverClark 6 months ago
Chinese piece of crap!
Should have bought Russian!
horrormonger 6 months ago 24
@horrormonger Well I guess we can say that Chinese guns definitely aren't for self-defence lol
Fengg9 5 months ago
The majority of AKs used are Chinese. AK fanboys say the AK is so good cause everyone uses it but say the majority is a piece of crap.
every gun malfunctions anyways.....
MrBsct 4 months ago
@MrBsct It's not Chinese this one in the video. The Chinese rifles are quite well made actually. Every gun malfunctions, but the AK will do it less then most comparable assault rifles.
esh325 4 months ago
@horrormonger China makes some of the best ak's in the world bro
rqm420 4 months ago
@rqm420 Better than the actual Russian(s) who invented it?
BTW, women do exist and can type. I aint your bro, bro.
horrormonger 4 months ago
@horrormonger sorry ma'am didnt mean to offend you! chinese aks arent crap. but by you earlier statment i can already tell you dont shoot AKs much so its not gunna be worth my time to sit here and argue with a little girl! have a nice day ma'am!
rqm420 4 months ago
@rqm420 Well! Thank you, Mr. Congeniality!
I was just typing what came to mind at the time...
Ever watch FPSRussia?
horrormonger 4 months ago
Shit camera work
tgnz24 6 months ago
change the parts and carry on lol...what is the grain u were firing? more then 154?
cadillacclint86 6 months ago
made in china
DelighT112 6 months ago
"WOAH" walks*--- " You alright"-- to the thing on the floor*
garibayja123 6 months ago
My money is on a split-neck from 50 year old ammo that was sitting below a leak in a damp warehouse that the Russians sold to the Iraqi Army for 5 dollars a crate.
Elementlmage 6 months ago
yeah right moron im sure it wasnt the shit mil spec ammo ur shooting
always quick to blame the gun there the best and most likely will always be
cadillacclint86 6 months ago
@cadillacclint86 i would say that shell was a little bit over the maximum load, alot over max load
phil656565 6 months ago
yeah right moron im sure it wasnt the shit mil spec ammo ur shooting
cadillacclint86 6 months ago
Iraqi 7.62 ammo was generally shite. When we started using Russian ammo, wh had no problems.
Brit Airborne.
stubbostubbs 6 months ago
Typical for weapons with high volume low quality production.
jetpowered1 7 months ago
@jetpowered1 None of my AK's are low quality. How do you know it was the rifle and not the ammo? Every gun can blow up regardless of quality.
esh325 7 months ago
Probably some shitty knock off of a knock off of a legit AKM from Romania. I would seriously trust an M1 Garand or Kar 98K found in a cache than an AK from a bazaar. Sure, they both might have shot out barrels, but they won't be Avtomat Knockovas.
In short, get the right ammo and get an authentic AK.
Reynard13Fuchs 7 months ago
How do I turn it off? WHat I thought theses Contractors were professionals.
THAL1499 7 months ago
@THAL1499 At killing terrorrists, but at using cameras...Meh, not so much
2142Unknown 7 months ago
that *Ding* was the dust cover hiting his face.
masterman467 7 months ago
That's an AKM, not an AK-47.
ShadowBlade448 7 months ago
AKs are reliable ALL THE TIME. If you clean em.
hjkentproductions 7 months ago
@hjkentproductions if you use noncrosive ammo no you dont
noahboa13000 7 months ago
@noahboa13000 Even with noncorrosive ammunition, when any firearm is exposed to the elements, wether it be dirt, dust or anything really outside, it requires cleaning. Now, the Ak- 47 is quite the exception because it can withstand alot of damage and exposure without being cleaned and still function properly, but due to the engineering of the firearm, it still must be cleaned to ensure a 100% success rate upon discharge of the firearm.
hjkentproductions 7 months ago
@hjkentproductions And shoot with legit ammo.
suddenlyill 7 months ago
@suddenlyill Well, if you buy illegitimate ammunition, then that is your fault for not properly inspecting the ammunition, and you cannot blame such a mistake on a firearm.
hjkentproductions 7 months ago
@hjkentproductions That's an obvious given. This is more of a warning to new shooters: because 7.62 x 39 and 5.56 are the most common carriages fired, they're also more likely to be bought on a budget, ie Russian ammo.
suddenlyill 7 months ago
@suddenlyill You call russian ammunition budget ammunition?
hjkentproductions 7 months ago
@hjkentproductions Russian Tula FMJ, 20rnd: $4.99, Golden Bear Russian 125 Grain Soft Point $8.19, Federal American Eagle 124 FMJ: $17.49, Fiocchi 123 Gn FMJ: $10.29. What would you call it?
suddenlyill 7 months ago
@suddenlyill typically russian ammunition is extremely reliable, and budget usually classifies its target nouns as "Cheap and irreliable", Russian ammo is cheap AND reliable. At least most.
hjkentproductions 7 months ago
@hjkentproductions Well, that's just like, your opinion. Man.
suddenlyill 7 months ago
@hjkentproductions Depends on the company. I've gotten so many bad primers with tula and wolf 7.62x39. Not to mention the bullet diameters are inconsistent and it's dirty. I would never trust my life to my ammo. Golden tiger and Brown bear are a lot better on the other hand.
esh325 7 months ago
@esh325 Oh lord, DONT EVER USE WOLF. Common sense right there. A complete Retard at the range the other day was shooting .380 with a box of wolf ammo. Jammed on him countless times, and he CLEARLY wasnt proficient on how to unjam a firearm. -_____-
hjkentproductions 7 months ago
@hjkentproductions Wolf and Tula are only good as plinking ammo, not serious use. I imagine it was jam that could be easily cleared with a tap out of the magazine and racking of the slide. A good .380 should feed wolf.
esh325 7 months ago
@suddenlyill Yeah, and a guarantee you that Golden Bear will out shoot the Federal. Granted, I am more partial to S&B and Prvi Partisan myself. Prvi is on par with every American ammunition maker for half the price and S&B WILL out shoot just about anything other than Fiocchi match and other premium loads Lapua.
If you haven't shot any S&B(it's rather scarce atm) pick yourself up a box if you don't believe me. It makes Winchester Whitebox look like Monarch!
Elementlmage 6 months ago
@Elementlmage Yeah, those rounds are good. I'm not saying American ammo is the cream of the crop, just pointing out that some Russian ammo lack standards. Tula is especially bad, a few bad experiences with rims breaking off, leaving the cartridge stuck in the rifle.
suddenlyill 6 months ago
@suddenlyill Was it white box or that "Tulammo" crap?
Elementlmage 6 months ago
@suddenlyill I have put over 2,000 Prvi Partisan, 1,200 Tula rounds, 400 Federal Eagle, 200 Golden Bear (decent) and 30 of that Brown Bear (crap) through my Yugo M70 and there is simply no comparison..The Serbian ammo is vastly superior in every category. Not condemning Russian ammo, but their commercial loads need allot of work to be considered anything but bargain bin practice ammo IMO. Federal Eagle and Golden Bear has been 100% reliable but is less accurate than the Prvi in MY gun,
Bertisevil666 5 months ago
Looks like it came out of head space and a round went off out of breach.
flat4foxvw 7 months ago
Comment removed
danielukraineable 7 months ago
Just the dust cover blew up probably from a faulty round maybe it was filled to the max with powder the extractor and dust cover were probably damaged and could easily be replaced
redfirekla 7 months ago
This is the reason why Russia isn't a superpower anymore, their equipment is trash
xgeneralzimx 7 months ago
Comment removed
danielukraineable 7 months ago
Shooter muzzle sweeps the cameraman right after the KB.
gunny7d6 7 months ago in playlist _to_watch
after seeing this it kinda makes me not want to shoot my ak i have a semi auto wasr gp 10/63 ak 47 n the weird thing is when i slide the bolt carrier to load in a round back like it gets kind of stuck it only happens if i pull the slide like a wussy 0__o wtf does anyone know whats wrong???
thepoopstinks1 7 months ago
@thepoopstinks1 because AK's arent meant to be wracked slowly. but since you have a wasr you might wanna do a break in of either shooting about 100-150 rounds. or sit there and wrack the slide about 100 times. dont pull back and then let it go forward slowly, pull back and let it go forward on its own spring tension.
joshkkv 7 months ago
@thepoopstinks I've had that problem its because the hammer is binding on the carrier, if you pick up a new FCG, it will fix the problem (at least it did for me)
mr153 7 months ago
THIS IS WHAT HAPPENS WHEN U BUY A PEACE OF SHIT STAMPED AK INSTEAD OF A MILLED AK LIKE THEY WERE INTENDED STAMPED$ 400 = JUNK MILLED COST ABOUT $1000 AND LAST FOREVER
odin5150 7 months ago
@odin5150 learn to spell please.
sethboy66 7 months ago
@odin5150 What a moron.
redneckcp03 7 months ago
shit ammo, probably a squib (bullet stuck in the barrel after firing, then the next one caused the "explosion")
blackmetal308 7 months ago
@blackmetal308 na if it was a squib, you would here it.
accordionsidekick 7 months ago
@blackmetal308 if it was a squib his barrel would have ruptured not the receiver. lol well its true, ak's never jam, they FUCKING EXPLODE!! lol
BurroBurrito1 7 months ago
What is funny is all the Call of Duty kids on here think the receiver cover blowing off is the same as the chamber blowing up.
That cover is a piece of stamped steel that is about as thin as tin foil and the rifle will run without it.
I'm guessing this was a double feed or really crappy ammo.
ryspace 8 months ago
@ryspace That was obviously and out of battery detonation. Those things are never good and you should expect at least the magazine to be warped. I'd bet that receiver cover will not fit back on it, and the extractor might be trashed. It's probably not worth it to get it fixed.
AngeredKabar 8 months ago
@AngeredKabar its Iraq he can buy another one for $15 american
BurroBurrito1 7 months ago