@ClassicNintendoShow Yup, check out the link in the description. But that's the full edition. The cheapest is the starter edition, $40. The $300 is the full or professional editon. And get this, this is advertised as a R/C sim.
@Julieno7i Why everyone hates Flight without having even tried it. Aerosoft sim for now its just vaporware. I have tried Flight and its gonna be closer to aeroflyfs than many people could think.
It's so funny when you think to FSX ! I know this airport in FSX, it's near Geneva. Traffic pattern are strange because you must turn around the city then go back to the airport.
@MrJoggl I didn't follow the real speeds of approach and takeoff because it was just a first contact to show how graphics looked like, see how flight model behaves and have a first impression.
@TUCKIE10 Because I wanted to get the attention from those who fly FSX. The point of this video is in promoting this sim so a good way to do that is when some one is looking for FSX videos he'll find AeroflyFS in the search.
Can I use freetrack? And how well optimized is the game?
GTASA911 1 week ago
@GTASA911 No idea if it has freetrack support, I does support TrackIR although.
About the performance. I can max it out on a "old" QuadCore 2 2.50, 4GB RAM and ATI 5770, getting between 55-80.
The best feature of this sim is the gliders and the photo realistic maps. If you love it, then that's your sim.
jtmedina75 1 week ago
The inclinometer is going nuts on takeoff
flyguyify 2 weeks ago
@flyguyify Why do you think this is happening?
jtmedina75 2 weeks ago
Nice flight. Very real like
xjt10 2 weeks ago
wat simulator is this
TheAbds2000 2 weeks ago
@TheAbds2000 FSX.
ClassicNintendoShow 1 week ago
@ClassicNintendoShow No, its a separate sim called AeroFly. It covers all of Switzerland. Go to the link in the description to learn more.
MrTornadoman97 1 week ago
@MrTornadoman97 Oh, sorry. My bad. XD
ClassicNintendoShow 1 week ago
@ClassicNintendoShow Ikr? It does look like an Addon'd out FSX. This is $300 though O_O
MrTornadoman97 1 week ago
@MrTornadoman97 Wha- the simulator itself?
ClassicNintendoShow 1 week ago
@ClassicNintendoShow Yup, check out the link in the description. But that's the full edition. The cheapest is the starter edition, $40. The $300 is the full or professional editon. And get this, this is advertised as a R/C sim.
MrTornadoman97 1 week ago
@MrTornadoman97 Why is it advertised as an R/C sim?
ClassicNintendoShow 1 week ago
@ClassicNintendoShow Actually I did more research and there is Aerofly and AeroflyFS. FS is the flight simulator version while the standard is R/C.
MrTornadoman97 1 week ago
@MrTornadoman97 Huh. Cool. XD
ClassicNintendoShow 1 week ago
@Julieno7i Why everyone hates Flight without having even tried it. Aerosoft sim for now its just vaporware. I have tried Flight and its gonna be closer to aeroflyfs than many people could think.
jtmedina75 3 weeks ago
@jtmedina75 - I've tried it too. It's for kids. Enjoy buzzing around Hawaii in microsoft-produced content.
aaron8862006 3 weeks ago
@aaron8862006 with full settings, MS Flight is as realistic as FSX stock planes. You might have tried it with arcade settings on.
jtmedina75 3 weeks ago
@jtmedina75 - No, I didn't.
aaron8862006 3 weeks ago
@aaron8862006 Sure.
jtmedina75 3 weeks ago
Warning FPS too low : 22 !
It's so funny when you think to FSX ! I know this airport in FSX, it's near Geneva. Traffic pattern are strange because you must turn around the city then go back to the airport.
Awesome graphics !
Julieno7i 3 weeks ago
@Julieno7i hehe I get between 50-70 almost all the time. When I record with FRAPS it sucks almost all the framerate.
Aerofly has very beautiful graphics but it lacks of multiplayer and other things.
I have a lot of fun flying gliders which I find it more realistic than gliding in FSX although.
jtmedina75 3 weeks ago
@jtmedina75 That let me dream of a future simulator ... Not Flight, but Aerosoft Sim.
Julieno7i 3 weeks ago
Nice video, but u r flyin too fast, actual approach speed is 120kmh and takeoff(rotate) speed is 100kmh. mfg joggl
MrJoggl 1 month ago
@MrJoggl I didn't follow the real speeds of approach and takeoff because it was just a first contact to show how graphics looked like, see how flight model behaves and have a first impression.
Besides I was just enjoying the flight.
jtmedina75 1 month ago
Nice video! Why did tou tag it as FSX and not as Aerofly FS?
TUCKIE10 1 month ago
@TUCKIE10 Because I wanted to get the attention from those who fly FSX. The point of this video is in promoting this sim so a good way to do that is when some one is looking for FSX videos he'll find AeroflyFS in the search.
jtmedina75 1 month ago