1,000 rounds? I doubt that. Does no one have any idea what bullets weigh, let alone a 1,000? It's all pretty simple regardless. Don't sell or allow mentally unstable people to own firearms, and put more things into place to prevent them from getting them. THat actions of a few "crazy" people shouldn't take firearms out of the hands of sane, responsible Americans.
I think these school and church shootings are the anti-gun lobby people trying to get anti-gun "ammunition"
Look at the crap they are getting away with in Georgia with trying to put those 12 stores out of business. That's bullshit and just proves that our "law" system can be bought off if you have the right 0 by the right 1.
There is no doubt in my mind that millions of lives could have been saved if the people were not "brainwashed" about gun ownership and had been well armed. ... Gun haters always want to forget the Warsaw Ghetto uprising, which is a perfect example of how a ragtag, half-starved group of Jews took 10 handguns and made asses out of the Nazis."
For the outsiders saying Americans need to ban firearms because high crime. I suggest they look up the gun laws in each state. New York is not going to have the same gun laws as Texas. The funny thing is, is that many of these states with strict gun control have higher crime. Because they make it harder for law-abidding citizens to get guns while the criminals still get them on the black market.
Their are more things to consider then just banning firearms altogether.
The 2md amendmant must be important. Look how much attention the libs pay to the 1st. amendmant so it stands the 2nd is up there in importance. Show your patriotism...go buy a gun.
Statistical crime is committed by weapons that are already hard to get, you know, those small cheap handguns.
Those have been banned in America since the 70's! What more do you want us to do? We have MORE THAN ENOUGH control, we need to start rolling back on some of the "controls" here soon.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Right: I mean that YES...criminals will and DO get hold of the guns....but not NEARLY as readily or in the same numbers as in the US. Have you any IDEA of the disparity in the numbers of gun deaths per year in the US, compared to the UK...or Canada, or France, or Japan, or Germany. I've clearly been misunderstood in my last comment: If so, then I apologise. But jesus christ, America...even if you QUARTER the stats, it's beyond belief. Live with it...you know it's the truth.
well, gun related deaths are dwarfed by drunk driving and other drug deaths... better ban vehicles and alcohol too. Bottom line, dictators such as Stalin, Mao, and Hitler all established dictatorial rights by gun control. The 2nd amendment was written for a reason my friend. How else will we take back our government when it becomes oppressive?
I know that in parts of the country where we can carry firearms, there are almost no crimes. Where the crimes are commited are in our cities, where guns ARE banned. Look at DC --- No guns allowed, but LOTS of murder.
Live with it, you know it's the truth. I don't know why you want to trade your rights for an illusion of safety.
Why did the UK's crime rate go UP once guns were banned?
The media would rather push their anti gun agenda, perpetrating all legal gun owners, as 'future killers,' rather than show them as good citizens who will do what they can for the preservation of life. To hell with these media clowns!
A&E had a "special" on TV, trying to link hunting and sport shooting to something like brainwashing kids into turning into killers.
let the next shooter know "there will be no glory for you! you will NOT have control! AND the story on the news will be about the HERO who killed you!!! not you!!!"
one honest person with a gun could have saved 32 lives at VT or 3 at niu
hate me... spit on me... talk bad... but when a duranged killer shows up looking to shoot up my classroom... me and my gun will save your life
this event was proof we need more firearms in the hands of citizens. look what happened the first time, he killed people and got away, then the second time, with an armed citizen, only 2 were wounded, and the gunman was stopped.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Hmmm...it's an awkward one, but at the end of the day, taking guns off the average Joe is one thing....but the 'Bad Guys' WILL always get guns. Best to have none at all. Not a real problem, here in the UK, but in the States, where there are millions of these things....I think the terms 'Horse' and 'Stable Door' spring to mind! Pity, really.
Yes look what happend when guns were "taken" away the criminals had guns but noone else did so gun crime shot up. Jesus Christ I would think you would know your own history better than me you fucking puf
You're clueless. So are you saying that criminals don't have guns in the UK? Where the hell do you really live, under a rock?
Drugs like cocaine are illegal, they can be easily smuggled and sold, and the same is true for firearms... and this is a statistical fact only ignored by dim wits and "feel good" ignoramuses like yourself.
Woo Bum-kon. guys like that are why they will never take my guns. a gun ban caused almost 60 people to be killed by that fuckin guy, nobody could defend against his weapons and grenades with their idealism about safe societies. besides my fellow appalachain brethren will never allow it.
Oh, no doubt the media is anti-gun I've seen that for decades. But they inadvertently admit she was armed in what alex reads at 4:23... "...twice her size and more heavily armed."
in australia there was one shooting, now because of that guns were recalled accept if you had a special permit i.e. farmer as a result nobody has guns we do not have shooting, robberies or any other gun related crimes because nobody has guns... America should do the same to prevent anymore gun related violence
* In 2004-05 the most common weapon used in homicide was a knife (32%). * A further 22% of homicides were committed using physical force (hands/feet), 15% with firearms and 14% with blunt instruments.
silly thing to say. only makes it easier to rob you because they dont have to wake the neighbors when you try to defend yourself, plus they can just stab you without fear of you pulling a gun
Because you said you didn't have any gun crime, but the official government statistics say you do, despite your gun ban. Posting facts makes me silly, huh?
did i? really? why dont you reread that, because i think youre confused. i am from america buddy. i live in north carolina. we have a law called the castle law where if you cross my property line i can shoot and kill you and i am protected from criminal charges. thats not a gun ban as far as i can tell. you should look at who said what before you reply to somebodies post.haha youre silly because you can type but you can't read
the right to bear arms as written in the constitution is as much to protect the people from a top heavy tyrannic gov't as it is to defend yourself and property
Finally, "people can fight back without guns." yeah, just ask the Monks gunned down by the government in Myanmar. IF YOU OUTLAW GUNS, ONLY OUTLAWS WILL HAVE THEM. shove off, flufpuss
Yet another false statement: "You are not allowed to hold a gun out in the open so nobody can know if you have a gun or not" Check out the carry laws of several States in my great country and you will find that carrying a weapon exposed on your hip is allowed. but most of us choose to carry concealed because we are not losers trying to intimidate people, we just exercise our right to self-defense.
The US's high murder rate is not a product of our right to own/carry firearms. You think someone who is willing to kill another human being for no reason would NOT do it if they didn't have a gun? Might as well ban baseball bats, too, I guess... And for the record, if you have the money, the US is CERTAINLY not the only place you can buy a gun privately any day of the week, it's just legal here :) Thank God
Oh, and in exactly how many cases is a law-abiding citizen's weapon used against him or her by a criminal? Look up some stats on that and I guarantee you'll find that it's rare...because here in America that scumbag would be lying dead on the ground before he GOT to the weapon.
I agree with Ron Paul on almost everything, but I just don't think humans are smart enough to have guns. Sure it is good for protection, but usually a robber has a gun too, and in a lot of cases the criminal uses your gun against you. Just look at the murder rate of the U.S.A. compared to other countries where guns aren't legal. The rates are far less than the U.S. and yet people think it's their right to own a gun. But I would rather just get rid of them all and people would feel a lot safer.
In New Orleans crime rate has sky rocketed... since FEMA took away their right to bear arms during Katrina. Do you think a robber is going to mug me if they know I have a gun? When you take away people's right to bear arms the only people left with guns are criminals, leaving those without them defenseless and subject to crime. Dictators throughout history de-weaponize their citizens in effort to control them. That's why the founding fathers gave us the right to bear arms!
Katrena is not a good example because that place was in complete chaos, and there was no athority, people were starving, etc... So it is a horrible exampple.
You still did not adress my arguement on why other countries like Canada have a lower murder rate then the U.S.A. which you can get a hand gun on the street if you have the money.
And why do you think the place was in total chaos? For one, looters did not begin until FEMA and the National Guard/Police took away guns; they stated they were taking away guns before the evacuation began. Katrina is a great example. Switzerland. They have the lowest crime rate around and the right to bear arms... again, are you more likely to attack knowing i have a gun? CAnada has lower murder rate; not lower crime rate; No Authority? national guardsmen were swarming the area?
The place was in total chaos because of the hurricane, and because the federal goverment messing up so bad, guns had nothing to do with it and it probablly would have been worse with guns and would have been many more deaths.
You are not allowed to hold a gun out in the open so nobody can know if you have a gun or not.
Canada does have a lower crime rate and I live in Canada so I should know. Canada does have athority but I have never seen any national guardsmen anywhere in my lifetime.
I respect your comments, but the FEDS didn't "mess up" by any means. They can use national emergency to take away your rights. National news reported on the crime rate sky-rocketing since guns were taken away. One of the first things un-democratic countries do to set up control against their citizens is to take away their guns, so you can't fight back against their will. In America, we're heading into a fascism because of this.
I was talking about how FEMA messed it up so badily by not getting everyone out of there, and many other things.
They can use national emergencys to do a lot of things, but I don't agree with guns in the first place. Taking guns away from a small group is not the answer.
America is heading in a bad direction, but people can fight back without guns. How many times has America use guns against it's own goverment? You could say once with the civil war but that would be it.
ok, from the beginning. People aren't smart enough to use guns? that argument works for you, fluf, since you can't even spell "Katrina" correctly, but otherwise has no basis. Usually the robber has a gun too? give me stats to back that up.
But if you look in Europe and various cities in the US not only is there not a small correlation between restrictive gun laws and lower gun related deaths, there is actually a negitive correlation.
i have seen your "guardsmen"..Oka Quebec in 1990 for one. and alot of this has to do with demographics, culture and age of cities.paris france has one of the most violent crime rates in the western world.
ill address it,,in canada you can get a handgun on the street if you have money, in my state ,michigan you need a permit to buy a handgun, hence any sold on the "street" are illegal, i was approached several years ago in Toronto, where a man offered to sell me a .45 auto pistol
In VT The police were told to stand down for hours, and with students not allowed to carry firearms to protect themselves in a public school, the shooter was allowed to pick off defenseless students at will... didn't you read about that? By the way, he had been co-opting with the FBI as well is what I've heard.
uh, VA tech? college students are not mature to have guns. i am a college student i dont need guns, thats what i pay taxes for, to have public security...you people are insane...i hope ron paul doesnt get elected
I want Ron Paul to get elected but I strongly disagree with his gun policy and think the second amendment is really stupid.
I don't agree that collage students aren't mature enough to have guns, because I think that applies to everyone in general. If you grow up thinking that it is okay to shoot someone for something as stupid as trespassing then there is something wrong. Even if someone were to take a 5 cent candy bar from your store, that automatically gives you the right to murder them?
Students shouldn't have the right to defend themselves? Shooters throughout history have been on psychotropic drugs and most of them were black-ops... take Columbine for example. Should I have the right to protect myself from such atrocities, or should I be left with nothing by my government? Important issue... thank you for responding!
People should have the right to defend them selves, I just don't think a bullet in the face for a bullet in the face is a good answer. Imagine if those shooters had no guns, they would have done a heck of a lot less dammage. There would not be any school shootings, not as many fatal robbings, the death rate would go down a lot. I would rather defend myself with non lethal force against someone else with non lethal force. Guns for everyone isn't a good idea unless you want people to be shot.
i still want to know about the vt shooting. how on earth did an untrained individual who had never shot a firearm previou to his purchases 1 month prior to the shootings manage to kill or wound over 30 people? with a .22 and 9mm pistol? he achieved a hit/wound/kill ratio that would turn a professional green with envy, with no training or prior experience with firearms. what on earth really happened?
They disarmed us in Australia after the staged port arthur shooting. Don't let them disarm you America! You are the last frontier! But FUCK Australia's guns laws. I'm joining the army next year so i can get guns legally and if i can't do it that way, i'll buy them off the black market. NOTHING is going to stop me from following liberty and the United States Constitution!
In Australia, we cant even OWN anything above a 9mm (providing it is over a certain length, to avoid concealment) let alone CARRY weapons outside of our MANDATORY Lockup safes which the Police can check in your house at will.
Dont let them take your guns America. The time to THINK is now.
yep. it's all true, and as alex said, this is just one of many things.
i like how alex presents this information in a way that isn't over-conspiratorial, but still, more needs to be done. the masses are still completely oblivious to what's going on
they have been methodically dumbed down, made uncaring, immoral, and worst of all: instinctively rejecting of anything alternative to what the media presents them
They are trying to smear him now. The attacks are getting more organized. We need to ralley behind him to get through this wave of "their" resitance. I am talking about Ron Paul.
Now they're trying to take our guns. Listen foks, both parties are controlled by the CFR special interest group and aren't honest( most of them are CFR members--not Ron Paul). Ron Paul is the only candidate who will protect not only all of our constitution, but especially the right to bare arms. Wake up before it's too late and vote for Ron Paul.
To be a CIA agent you have to have an IQ higher than 75.
Look at him struggling trying to read.
ytzuigt 1 year ago
1,000 rounds? I doubt that. Does no one have any idea what bullets weigh, let alone a 1,000? It's all pretty simple regardless. Don't sell or allow mentally unstable people to own firearms, and put more things into place to prevent them from getting them. THat actions of a few "crazy" people shouldn't take firearms out of the hands of sane, responsible Americans.
alexsell187 1 year ago
Anti gun propaganda is everywhere people. It's on tv, its in our movies, and our news. Keep your eye open for gun fear mongering.
MyDormantSoul 1 year ago
alex jones is a cia agent but sometimes he gets it right.
cassidy99ful 2 years ago
can you prove he's a CIA agent?
fatkidinabucket 2 years ago
I think these school and church shootings are the anti-gun lobby people trying to get anti-gun "ammunition"
Look at the crap they are getting away with in Georgia with trying to put those 12 stores out of business. That's bullshit and just proves that our "law" system can be bought off if you have the right 0 by the right 1.
IMO they should all hang.
Iraqveteran8888 3 years ago
yes. when guns are used positively the bullshit starts being spread. I hate fn hate mainstream media
terminator4447 3 years ago 5
There is no doubt in my mind that millions of lives could have been saved if the people were not "brainwashed" about gun ownership and had been well armed. ... Gun haters always want to forget the Warsaw Ghetto uprising, which is a perfect example of how a ragtag, half-starved group of Jews took 10 handguns and made asses out of the Nazis."
-Theodore Haas, Dachau Survivor
zack9912000 3 years ago 3
This comment has received too many negative votes show
He is not a good reporter. It's like he is reading the information as he is reporting it. Pro Gun USA
psguy60538 3 years ago
For the outsiders saying Americans need to ban firearms because high crime. I suggest they look up the gun laws in each state. New York is not going to have the same gun laws as Texas. The funny thing is, is that many of these states with strict gun control have higher crime. Because they make it harder for law-abidding citizens to get guns while the criminals still get them on the black market.
Their are more things to consider then just banning firearms altogether.
Lazlow80 3 years ago 3
The 2md amendmant must be important. Look how much attention the libs pay to the 1st. amendmant so it stands the 2nd is up there in importance. Show your patriotism...go buy a gun.
cabritorsss 3 years ago 2
We are never going to ban semi-automatics. We will never ban centerfire.
We will never have FULL licensing and registration. Get over it!
T850CSM101a1676 3 years ago
Statistical crime is committed by weapons that are already hard to get, you know, those small cheap handguns.
Those have been banned in America since the 70's! What more do you want us to do? We have MORE THAN ENOUGH control, we need to start rolling back on some of the "controls" here soon.
T850CSM101a1676 3 years ago
There's two types of gun crime; the statiscal kind, and then the rampage kind.
People that go on rampages get them the same way the law abiding do I guess. Problem solved by way of action taken in said story.
Next...
T850CSM101a1676 3 years ago
People you better start pooling your money and starting some REAL news organizations and give these Devils a run for their money!
NsOakland6 4 years ago
how true guns are band here in the uk ready for a tyrant goverment
SianHumphrey 4 years ago 2
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Right: I mean that YES...criminals will and DO get hold of the guns....but not NEARLY as readily or in the same numbers as in the US. Have you any IDEA of the disparity in the numbers of gun deaths per year in the US, compared to the UK...or Canada, or France, or Japan, or Germany. I've clearly been misunderstood in my last comment: If so, then I apologise. But jesus christ, America...even if you QUARTER the stats, it's beyond belief. Live with it...you know it's the truth.
bigkitten 4 years ago
well, gun related deaths are dwarfed by drunk driving and other drug deaths... better ban vehicles and alcohol too. Bottom line, dictators such as Stalin, Mao, and Hitler all established dictatorial rights by gun control. The 2nd amendment was written for a reason my friend. How else will we take back our government when it becomes oppressive?
fatkidinabucket 4 years ago
I know that in parts of the country where we can carry firearms, there are almost no crimes. Where the crimes are commited are in our cities, where guns ARE banned. Look at DC --- No guns allowed, but LOTS of murder.
Live with it, you know it's the truth. I don't know why you want to trade your rights for an illusion of safety.
Why did the UK's crime rate go UP once guns were banned?
IsntItWeThePeople 3 years ago 2
The media would rather push their anti gun agenda, perpetrating all legal gun owners, as 'future killers,' rather than show them as good citizens who will do what they can for the preservation of life. To hell with these media clowns!
A&E had a "special" on TV, trying to link hunting and sport shooting to something like brainwashing kids into turning into killers.
cramsa 4 years ago
let the next shooter know "there will be no glory for you! you will NOT have control! AND the story on the news will be about the HERO who killed you!!! not you!!!"
one honest person with a gun could have saved 32 lives at VT or 3 at niu
hate me... spit on me... talk bad... but when a duranged killer shows up looking to shoot up my classroom... me and my gun will save your life
BuyUSAsEthanolKilOil 4 years ago 3
this event was proof we need more firearms in the hands of citizens. look what happened the first time, he killed people and got away, then the second time, with an armed citizen, only 2 were wounded, and the gunman was stopped.
metallmayhem 4 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Hmmm...it's an awkward one, but at the end of the day, taking guns off the average Joe is one thing....but the 'Bad Guys' WILL always get guns. Best to have none at all. Not a real problem, here in the UK, but in the States, where there are millions of these things....I think the terms 'Horse' and 'Stable Door' spring to mind! Pity, really.
bigkitten 4 years ago
Yes look what happend when guns were "taken" away the criminals had guns but noone else did so gun crime shot up. Jesus Christ I would think you would know your own history better than me you fucking puf
Stuzzio 4 years ago 7
You're clueless. So are you saying that criminals don't have guns in the UK? Where the hell do you really live, under a rock?
Drugs like cocaine are illegal, they can be easily smuggled and sold, and the same is true for firearms... and this is a statistical fact only ignored by dim wits and "feel good" ignoramuses like yourself.
cramsa 4 years ago 4
Great vid!
koolk4ever 4 years ago
rate the videos!!! i give this one 5stars! government media is keeping us in the dark!!
go alex jones!!
lidwood 4 years ago 9
shlnmastakilla, they don't know nothin' bout us Appalachain folk!
castangman651 4 years ago
Woo Bum-kon. guys like that are why they will never take my guns. a gun ban caused almost 60 people to be killed by that fuckin guy, nobody could defend against his weapons and grenades with their idealism about safe societies. besides my fellow appalachain brethren will never allow it.
shlnmastakilla 4 years ago
Oh, no doubt the media is anti-gun I've seen that for decades. But they inadvertently admit she was armed in what alex reads at 4:23... "...twice her size and more heavily armed."
17662496 4 years ago
in australia there was one shooting, now because of that guns were recalled accept if you had a special permit i.e. farmer as a result nobody has guns we do not have shooting, robberies or any other gun related crimes because nobody has guns... America should do the same to prevent anymore gun related violence
heyitisyou 4 years ago
* In 2004-05 the most common weapon used in homicide was a knife (32%). * A further 22% of homicides were committed using physical force (hands/feet), 15% with firearms and 14% with blunt instruments.
slipfirep40 4 years ago
Yeah except America is not Australia.
It will not work like that.
cosmothespook 4 years ago
silly thing to say. only makes it easier to rob you because they dont have to wake the neighbors when you try to defend yourself, plus they can just stab you without fear of you pulling a gun
shlnmastakilla 4 years ago
Those were the AUSTRALIAN FIGURES YOU DUMBFUCK!
slipfirep40 4 years ago
why would you say that to me. doesnt even make sense in regard to our comments. you are silly now too just like heyitsyou
shlnmastakilla 4 years ago
Because you said you didn't have any gun crime, but the official government statistics say you do, despite your gun ban. Posting facts makes me silly, huh?
slipfirep40 4 years ago 2
did i? really? why dont you reread that, because i think youre confused. i am from america buddy. i live in north carolina. we have a law called the castle law where if you cross my property line i can shoot and kill you and i am protected from criminal charges. thats not a gun ban as far as i can tell. you should look at who said what before you reply to somebodies post.haha youre silly because you can type but you can't read
shlnmastakilla 4 years ago
the right to bear arms as written in the constitution is as much to protect the people from a top heavy tyrannic gov't as it is to defend yourself and property
deerslayer25 4 years ago 5
Finally, "people can fight back without guns." yeah, just ask the Monks gunned down by the government in Myanmar. IF YOU OUTLAW GUNS, ONLY OUTLAWS WILL HAVE THEM. shove off, flufpuss
castangman651 4 years ago
That is why I don't want anyone to have guns. PERIOD.
flufbus 4 years ago
Nobody? Not even cops and military? How about private security?
slipfirep40 4 years ago
There will never be a place with no guns, but if there were no guns then they would use non lethal force.
flufbus 4 years ago
Sort of how we used non-lethal forc in the thousands of years before we even had guns?
slipfirep40 4 years ago
Oh yes, of course we never used lethal force before there were guns! Can you be more stupid!???
Tyler13R 4 years ago
Yet another false statement: "You are not allowed to hold a gun out in the open so nobody can know if you have a gun or not" Check out the carry laws of several States in my great country and you will find that carrying a weapon exposed on your hip is allowed. but most of us choose to carry concealed because we are not losers trying to intimidate people, we just exercise our right to self-defense.
castangman651 4 years ago
The US's high murder rate is not a product of our right to own/carry firearms. You think someone who is willing to kill another human being for no reason would NOT do it if they didn't have a gun? Might as well ban baseball bats, too, I guess... And for the record, if you have the money, the US is CERTAINLY not the only place you can buy a gun privately any day of the week, it's just legal here :) Thank God
castangman651 4 years ago
Oh, and in exactly how many cases is a law-abiding citizen's weapon used against him or her by a criminal? Look up some stats on that and I guarantee you'll find that it's rare...because here in America that scumbag would be lying dead on the ground before he GOT to the weapon.
castangman651 4 years ago
Ron Paul raped my son :(
thisisriduculios 4 years ago
this alex jones is trash
ricksterga 4 years ago
I agree with Ron Paul on almost everything, but I just don't think humans are smart enough to have guns. Sure it is good for protection, but usually a robber has a gun too, and in a lot of cases the criminal uses your gun against you. Just look at the murder rate of the U.S.A. compared to other countries where guns aren't legal. The rates are far less than the U.S. and yet people think it's their right to own a gun. But I would rather just get rid of them all and people would feel a lot safer.
flufbus 4 years ago
In New Orleans crime rate has sky rocketed... since FEMA took away their right to bear arms during Katrina. Do you think a robber is going to mug me if they know I have a gun? When you take away people's right to bear arms the only people left with guns are criminals, leaving those without them defenseless and subject to crime. Dictators throughout history de-weaponize their citizens in effort to control them. That's why the founding fathers gave us the right to bear arms!
fatkidinabucket 4 years ago
Katrena is not a good example because that place was in complete chaos, and there was no athority, people were starving, etc... So it is a horrible exampple.
You still did not adress my arguement on why other countries like Canada have a lower murder rate then the U.S.A. which you can get a hand gun on the street if you have the money.
flufbus 4 years ago
And why do you think the place was in total chaos? For one, looters did not begin until FEMA and the National Guard/Police took away guns; they stated they were taking away guns before the evacuation began. Katrina is a great example. Switzerland. They have the lowest crime rate around and the right to bear arms... again, are you more likely to attack knowing i have a gun? CAnada has lower murder rate; not lower crime rate; No Authority? national guardsmen were swarming the area?
fatkidinabucket 4 years ago
The place was in total chaos because of the hurricane, and because the federal goverment messing up so bad, guns had nothing to do with it and it probablly would have been worse with guns and would have been many more deaths.
You are not allowed to hold a gun out in the open so nobody can know if you have a gun or not.
Canada does have a lower crime rate and I live in Canada so I should know. Canada does have athority but I have never seen any national guardsmen anywhere in my lifetime.
flufbus 4 years ago
I respect your comments, but the FEDS didn't "mess up" by any means. They can use national emergency to take away your rights. National news reported on the crime rate sky-rocketing since guns were taken away. One of the first things un-democratic countries do to set up control against their citizens is to take away their guns, so you can't fight back against their will. In America, we're heading into a fascism because of this.
fatkidinabucket 4 years ago
I was talking about how FEMA messed it up so badily by not getting everyone out of there, and many other things.
They can use national emergencys to do a lot of things, but I don't agree with guns in the first place. Taking guns away from a small group is not the answer.
America is heading in a bad direction, but people can fight back without guns. How many times has America use guns against it's own goverment? You could say once with the civil war but that would be it.
flufbus 4 years ago
Its called the revolutionary war you dumbfuck.
How else can you fight back without guns? Throw rocks like the Palestinians?
slipfirep40 4 years ago
Yes
flufbus 4 years ago
ok, from the beginning. People aren't smart enough to use guns? that argument works for you, fluf, since you can't even spell "Katrina" correctly, but otherwise has no basis. Usually the robber has a gun too? give me stats to back that up.
castangman651 4 years ago
how about no fight at all, you must be some kind of mountain hill biller
ricksterga 4 years ago
But if you look in Europe and various cities in the US not only is there not a small correlation between restrictive gun laws and lower gun related deaths, there is actually a negitive correlation.
atheistnarnia 4 years ago
I still see 90% percent of the time not having guns causes less deaths.
flufbus 4 years ago
"Not having guns"
Should all guns then be destroyed?
I don't see your point...
Making it illegal to own a gun obviously don't make a difference, so you want all guns to be destroyed?
What are you trying to say?
atheistnarnia 4 years ago
It is a big problem to do destroy all guns because people would be in uproar and there would be more crume. But making more guns is not the answer.
I am not in any position to get rid of guns, but I just disagree with the gun policy in America.
flufbus 4 years ago
Please elaborate, your against what?
Allowing people to own guns, manufacturing guns... what?
You would ban the manufacturing of guns?
Or you would make them illegal to own?
Which is it?
atheistnarnia 4 years ago
i have seen your "guardsmen"..Oka Quebec in 1990 for one. and alot of this has to do with demographics, culture and age of cities.paris france has one of the most violent crime rates in the western world.
hondamagna750 4 years ago
ill address it,,in canada you can get a handgun on the street if you have money, in my state ,michigan you need a permit to buy a handgun, hence any sold on the "street" are illegal, i was approached several years ago in Toronto, where a man offered to sell me a .45 auto pistol
hondamagna750 4 years ago
Kk, you guys keep your land of the shit, home of the shit, I'm going to Europe.
YawnGod 4 years ago
good. Leave America free. only if neocons and democrats could do the same.
philippe1985 4 years ago 2
r u going to post a part 2???????
mankind2008 4 years ago 2
I'm working on it, thanx to everyone who cares about this important issue, you're all patriots for caring as far as i'm concerned!
fatkidinabucket 4 years ago
In VT The police were told to stand down for hours, and with students not allowed to carry firearms to protect themselves in a public school, the shooter was allowed to pick off defenseless students at will... didn't you read about that? By the way, he had been co-opting with the FBI as well is what I've heard.
fatkidinabucket 4 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
what an idiot you are...of course students shouldnt be allowed guns...you are just as fucking crazy as this asshole alex jones
ricksterga 4 years ago
Why should a student de denied there rights to self protection? What logical reason do you have?
putittogether 4 years ago
uh, VA tech? college students are not mature to have guns. i am a college student i dont need guns, thats what i pay taxes for, to have public security...you people are insane...i hope ron paul doesnt get elected
ricksterga 4 years ago
I want Ron Paul to get elected but I strongly disagree with his gun policy and think the second amendment is really stupid.
I don't agree that collage students aren't mature enough to have guns, because I think that applies to everyone in general. If you grow up thinking that it is okay to shoot someone for something as stupid as trespassing then there is something wrong. Even if someone were to take a 5 cent candy bar from your store, that automatically gives you the right to murder them?
flufbus 4 years ago
yeah nobody has the right to take anyone else's life away regardless
ricksterga 4 years ago
So your saying that the woman shouldn't have shot the madman, saving countless lives, and is a filthy, bloodthirsty ingrate for carrying a gun?
slipfirep40 4 years ago
I would rather help the man, send him to a hospital to fix his problems, not just kill.
flufbus 4 years ago
How are you going to help him when he just killed you and a hundred other people?
slipfirep40 4 years ago
Ummmm what? I never said that he killed the person who was trying to put him into a hospital.
flufbus 4 years ago
Students shouldn't have the right to defend themselves? Shooters throughout history have been on psychotropic drugs and most of them were black-ops... take Columbine for example. Should I have the right to protect myself from such atrocities, or should I be left with nothing by my government? Important issue... thank you for responding!
fatkidinabucket 4 years ago
People should have the right to defend them selves, I just don't think a bullet in the face for a bullet in the face is a good answer. Imagine if those shooters had no guns, they would have done a heck of a lot less dammage. There would not be any school shootings, not as many fatal robbings, the death rate would go down a lot. I would rather defend myself with non lethal force against someone else with non lethal force. Guns for everyone isn't a good idea unless you want people to be shot.
flufbus 4 years ago
yeah, cause getting your head smashed in with a hammer is non-lethal.
slipfirep40 4 years ago 3
And where the fuck did that come from.
flufbus 4 years ago
i still want to know about the vt shooting. how on earth did an untrained individual who had never shot a firearm previou to his purchases 1 month prior to the shootings manage to kill or wound over 30 people? with a .22 and 9mm pistol? he achieved a hit/wound/kill ratio that would turn a professional green with envy, with no training or prior experience with firearms. what on earth really happened?
billyquick 4 years ago
Maybe he played a lot of video games.
bootme21 4 years ago
Save our Freedoms. Vote Ron Paul. That woman should be all over the news as a HERO.
Free Hugs From TX
RundoeTX
rundoetx 4 years ago 5
Only 1,289 views when paris hilton gets MILLIONS?!
smashthestate911 4 years ago 6
yes, this is our society.
W4d5Y 4 years ago 4
They disarmed us in Australia after the staged port arthur shooting. Don't let them disarm you America! You are the last frontier! But FUCK Australia's guns laws. I'm joining the army next year so i can get guns legally and if i can't do it that way, i'll buy them off the black market. NOTHING is going to stop me from following liberty and the United States Constitution!
sniper479 4 years ago 7
In Australia, we cant even OWN anything above a 9mm (providing it is over a certain length, to avoid concealment) let alone CARRY weapons outside of our MANDATORY Lockup safes which the Police can check in your house at will.
Dont let them take your guns America. The time to THINK is now.
SulfurCitizen 4 years ago 8
yep. it's all true, and as alex said, this is just one of many things.
i like how alex presents this information in a way that isn't over-conspiratorial, but still, more needs to be done. the masses are still completely oblivious to what's going on
they have been methodically dumbed down, made uncaring, immoral, and worst of all: instinctively rejecting of anything alternative to what the media presents them
LiquidMetalBand 4 years ago 5
Great point Alex.
Everyone should Conceal carry. Willing and Able.
morrisonak 4 years ago 5
They are trying to smear him now. The attacks are getting more organized. We need to ralley behind him to get through this wave of "their" resitance. I am talking about Ron Paul.
Le4rner 4 years ago 9
Now they're trying to take our guns. Listen foks, both parties are controlled by the CFR special interest group and aren't honest( most of them are CFR members--not Ron Paul). Ron Paul is the only candidate who will protect not only all of our constitution, but especially the right to bare arms. Wake up before it's too late and vote for Ron Paul.
JackNeedles 4 years ago 5
Ron Paul will win if the votes not rigged.
The whole world is hoping for Ron Paul.
saltnpepper101 4 years ago 11
he's not a reporter, he simply interprets the spin of the mainstream media. Go Alex!
fatkidinabucket 3 years ago