i agree you cant pick and chose the bible. bible says jesus is the only way to heaven. (better believe it)
whats the bible say about homosexuality--->1 cor 6:9-10, Do not be deceived: Neither the sexually immoral nor idolaters nor adulterers nor male prostitutes nor homosexual offenders will inherit the kingdom of God.
we will all stand before god on judgement day and all that will matter then is did you recieve jesus while you had the chance.
@B01318183 thats not what jesus ment. he said if your eyes cause you to sin (example) looking at porn ect. then stop looking at porn before it causes you to fall away from god and seek living in sin.
@B01318183 its cut and dry ---> 1 cor 6:9-10, Do you not know that the wicked will not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived: Neither the sexually immoral nor idolaters nor adulterers nor male prostitutes nor homosexual offenders will inherit the kingdom of God.
what more is there to say?
if homosexuals would turn from living in sin and recieve jesus. jesus would forgive them and welcome them into heaven
@mrcooldude964 It also says that you should stone your child death if he/she disobeys you. I could find more morality in Mein Kampf. And don't say that Jesus abolished that law because he actually criticized people for not killing there disobedient children(Mark 7:5-10).
@B01318183 Bible don’t say disobey it says the child should be put to death if the child ==curses== his mother or father.
Mark 7:10,For Moses said, 'Honor your father and your mother, and, 'Anyone who curses his father or mother must be put to death.
But since the only testament we have new rules now. It’s funny how all the people that try to mock and belittle the bible always run to the Old Testament. Because you don’t want to hear john 3:16 (we don’t even live in the Old Testament)
@mrcooldude964 you forgot to mention those who wear polycotton blends, those who mark their bodies with tattoos (even if theyre religion related), those who love crayfish and mussels and those who shave/cut their beard will also not inhereit the kingdom of god.
I guess we'll just be hanging in the LGBT heaven with the seafood buffet and the lesbian pool party.
@s2viv God did say to stay away from some things because they are not good for us but eating shell fish ect will not stop you from heaven. Only thing that will stop you from heaven is continuing to mock and reject Jesus and his word
And what makes you so sure that you're getting into Heaven? Personally, I'd take eternity in Hell when I die over spending a day in Heaven if it's filled with pompous assholes who get their kicks through religious hatred such as yourself.
@Jpmadore1 if only you know what you were saying, the time will come when you will understand hell is real. i just hope you see it before its to late, satan has your eyes totally blinded and each day your another day closer to hell and dont even have a clue you are
ask god to open your eyes before its to late for you
@B01318183 thats not what jesus ment. he said if your eyes cause you to sin (example) looking at porn ect. then stop looking at porn before it causes you to fall away from god and seek living in sin.
@mrcooldude964 every culture has an origin myth, however it is only certain religions in which there are punishment/reward systems, omniscent personified deities and heirarchal human egocentricism. Before defending your own learnings as absolute understand the evolution of theology. if you had not been taught this story, you would not know it; however people do not pick their biology. assuming the meaning of a book you havent read is a danger, the word homosexual did not even exist at that time
@wankerpanther I thought Christians didn't curse? Or put anyone down? You sure are a 'decent' Christian yourself. Oh and I'm an Atheist, yet I'm happy and content. Hmmmm.... Seems someone's making rash judgements on others..... I bet the Bible has a few stories to tell on that.
@wankerpanther and maybe if you religious cult members walked away from your brainwashing sessions and used your own brain more you'd be better americans
@wankerpanther You honestly think god hates anyone? Are you sure you've even LOOKED at the bible?! It's pretty pathetic, because it's practacly plastered to the bible that god loves every living thing. Doesn't your mother make you memorize bible verses if you use that kind of language? Oops, obviously not >:P
@WootPuppy2 Have YOU looked at the bible?Half of that morbid fairy tale is nothing but who to kill and how to kill them, INCLUDING homosexuals (Lev.18:22), and handicapped people (Lev. 21:17-23). Exodus 35:2 states that anyone working on the sabbath day should be put to death. Lev. 25:44 states it's okay to have slaves.This is only a handful of horrible things in the bible! Love? Sounds more like hate is plastered on the bible
@WootPuppy2 "Then I heard the LORD say to the other men, Show no mercy; have no pity! Kill them all – old and young, girls and women and little children. But do not touch anyone with the mark. Begin your task right here at the Temple." So they began by killing the seventy leaders. "Defile the Temple!" the LORD commanded. "Fill its courtyards with the bodies of those you kill! Go!" So they went throughout the city and did as they were told." (Ezekiel 9:5-7 NLT) yeah I think he does
All those who have supported the gay and lesbian marriages have some or the other time had fucked their their mother, sister or daughter hence want to first legalize same sex marriages and then legalize marriages between bother and sister, father and daughter, mother and son etc. Dont talk about the Bible as it says that God made a woman for a man, not a man for man. Also read Romans chapter 1 then you will know why God condems homosexuality.
yep your right, gay marriage will probably lead to stuff like polygamy or incest. after all when interracial marriage was legalized people said it would open the doorway to gay marriage. its happening!
god only made a man and a woman to populate the earth with. last time i checked we didnt have that problem. and god said let there be incest.
according to romans gays are deserving of death. do you want to pass laws to kill homosexuals, like the truely christian nation of uganda?
@wankerpanther, nono, god hates you :D so go hate more people for who they are. and hate yourself too. also doesn't the bible teach to live and let live USE SOME COMMON SENSE!. you cant make gay people go away so why bother hating them, that's like hating a wooden post
WOW! Could this actually be an intelligent, peaceful, civil exchange in a YouTube comment section??? I'm not sure how to act. Where is the infantile namecalling and the clever, condescending remarks? The colorful metaphors and bad grammar are strangely absent! Are you guys in the right place???
The right to marry does not apply to all. If it deed we wouldn't be at this site now. I am legally entitled to vote my conscience or belief whether it's based on The Bible or my belief in Unicorns. It's nobody's fucking business! Equally the same for gays. The rest is just pissing and moaning. Afterward.
You're laughing shame in the world of critical thinkers. I have studied the bible thoroughly with my collegues. Who made you the authority to shove you belief down other peoples' lives? Thomas Jefferson was right about people like you. Stay away from government because you will use it to shove your religious ideology and totalitarianism down the peoples' throat. Every has the right to be happy if it does not interfere with you. Take a few courses in ethics and crtical thinking.
Sonimmortal: Let me rephrase for intellectual honesty: My right to vote my beliefs, (religious or otherwise) and conscience is constitutionally protected. Thank Patrick Henry for working hard to promulgate through others, that thing called the Bill of Rights. You characterize my freedom to vote as "shoving my belief down other peoples lives." You've no idea how gay marriage would effect me. Let's be honest; you don't fucking care. BTW, I'm sure I have more than enough education to hang.
Very well and good point made. You do have the right to vote but understand that morality is an agreement between people in a society for the proper functioning of society so that everyone may enjoy, peace, happiness, and freedom. If a happiness wrongs another individual, then it cannot be accepted as moral conduct condusive to those desired things we call peace, happiness, and freedom. Now, with all due respect, explain how gay marriage hinders anyone of those things?
Sonimmortal: Well, this sounds egalitarian in nature to me. Assuming arguendo your morality model, can we agree we can't legislate this "morality?" If we were to design a new society, perhaps. If the historical, traditional definition of "marriage" were expanded to include gay marriage, I would be deeply wounded and offended emotionally, and spiritually. It's patently offensive to my core beliefs. Apart from well-settled law, defining marriage as between man and woman, the Bible's my authority.
There are many things that offend us whether emotionally, visually, spiritually, or mentally but there is a fine line when it comes to freedom and the denial of it. I understand your view. When it comes to freedom, there has to be a standard by which we determine morality in society that fights for freedom. I personally don't like the idea of homosexuality but I do defend there right to freedom. It is here where we must make the decision to follow faith or reason. Have you read Immanuel Kant
Sonimmortal: Because that right to vote individually is sacrosanct, and is inherently subjective, attacking those who vote accordingly is contrary to that sacred constitutional right. That's what the sites cater to; attacking those who have lawfully exercised a guaranteed right. Attacking someone for that can never be condoned. Yet that's what has happened, including attacking Mormons, campaign contributors. Talk about conduct which society must reject. I offer that example.
Tonestar100, please realize that my argument wasn't on the right to vote. I respect that from everyone. I was arguing on the stance of prop 8 and it validity as an argument. You are correct. Attacking the right to vote should never be condoned.
Sonimmortal: A definition for your reference to "freedom" would be helpful here. I've read Kant with regard to natural law, Jefferson and his attachment to the Enlightenment movement around the time he was to succeed Patrick Henry. I do get his philosophical construct to which you alluded in man-made religion free of a diety. Just the definiition of Deists brings it's own propblems.
When you get the time, read Kant in regards to Morality and Ethics. I think you'll understand where i'm coming from. Kant is one of the very few philosopher that actually reasoned the existence of God which makes him very interesting when he writes about morality and ethics. Of course he wasn't choosing a certain religious persuasion or domination but it makes you think.
I believe you refer to Categorical and Hypothetical imperatives. Kant's stated that Categorical Imperative determines whether an act is morally permissible if it can be made into a universal law. Example: If would-be thieves were contemplating stealing from another person, they would choose not to because to do so would mean they are perfectly fine with another stealing from them as well. Simply put a person should act according to what they would like to see as a universal moral law. So...
In regards to Prop 8, because the issue for gays is happiness, recognition and rights that comes with being married, the categorical imperative would be to vote in favor of gay-marriage because to deny happiness and certain rights would create the universal law that denying happiness and rights to those who oppose is morally acceptable also. I understand that allowing gay marriage will offend many but so did the ending of slavery. Yet, I admit this one is much more complicated.
Sonimmortal: It seems to be a very delicate paradigm, virtually in opposite to our American judicial system. We live in a society whereby everyone's ox is continually being gored.
Sonimmortal: Regarding Prop 8 much of the problem is a function of who is defining the issue. Prop 8 supporters want the historical and traditional definition to remain undisturbed as it has been since gaining statehood and the founding of our country for that matter. I think the better course would be for gays to truly learn to love themselves and not require the "label" of marriage. I believe if every legal benefit were conferred through civil union, the'yd still demand marriage.
Funny, those who worship their cock gods of sodomy and their labial lordesses of lesbos accuse others of " picking and choosing"....when it is the Homosexual that 'picks and chooses" to wallow in the the rectal anal glands of other men, when it is the lesbian that picks and chooses to worship at the labial altar of lesbianism. Pick and choose indeed
Honestly, how much money would really be made? I would like to see the statistic on how many gays want to get married and how much they'll spend on their wedding, and how much of that money will go to the state of California.
What makes me mad is that people are judging people by their genetic make up. And there really isnt anything anyone can do about it. and the whole, it is going to be teached in school crap, it is already there. my best friend is gay, and he is so easy to talk to about female problems. I wonder if people who voted yes on prop 8 even knew people who are GLT?
I'v been searching for a srtrat answer on why gay marge is wrong and so far god is all i got our country was built on separation of church and state :l wrong to
You know, slavery was "traditional", too. The people who support Prop 8 are all bigoted, close-minded Christians. It's interesting how they talk about "preserving marriage". You know that the divorce rate in the United States is about 40%, right? So I think the proponents of "traditional" marriage are doing their part to destroy its "traditional" meaning, too. You know, one man one woman till death do us part, lest it be adultery? But Gays, no, they can't marry because the BIBLE says blah blah..
to the man offended that this is compared to civil rights. OK. They ARE civil rights, though. MLK and Coretta had openly gay people on their staff and specifically supported their rights, AND NAACP head Julian Bond was just the headline speaker at the National Equality March in D.C. this weekend. His words? this IS about civil rights.
so gays couldn't vote when, or had to use separate bathrooms when? there were way more lynchings because of race than sexual orientation, it's not the same.God Bless.
how many lynchings does it take to make them bad? one? a dozen? 100? the countryside?.
Way to bring God into to. He does. Thanks for checking though. My extended family was wiped out in the Holocaust. I wouldn't say that gLBT discrimination was equal to that, but I would agree that both are demeaning, degrading, and shameful.
gays don't use separate bathrooms, but they are prohibited from being at their dying partner's bedsides (not blood relatives), and are the only category of hate crime on the rise (all other categories declined). There are 515 rights specifically denied gay partners that their hetero alter egos enjoy. Miscegnation was an issue in the 1960s depending on the state you lived in. Today, I could lose custody of my kids depending on which state I live in.
So no, I'm not sent to a homo only bathroom. But there are threats to me and my family much more pressing than that. Hate crimes and I'm a target any time I walk down the street with my partner, as are my kids. Denial of access to partners in hospitals and lack of equal protection under the law.
that's probably enough for now. I don't get why as a member of a group that has suffered horrible discrimination that you would seek to do the same to another group. And why are you kicking this up, posting on this page anyway?
as a black man, who lives in the south, and whose father grew up during segregation, it is insulting to my intelligence to compare the civil rights movement, to gay rights. and to talk about intolerance and not mention idk, crap like touch, the classic movie, saved, hamlet 2, and the king of craptastic flicks. funny, he he ha. you're welcome ,and it's been you're pleasure.
Julian Bond, head of the NAACP, was a keynote speaker at the National Equality March on Washington D.C. this past weekend. Funny, the head of the NAACP insists this IS all about Civil Rights.
Church weddings and Civil marriage licenses are not required to be tied together. The marriage license is a legal document that guarantees its owners certain civil rights. They can't be denied to a class of its citizens.
and he has also, compared bush 43's judicial nominees to the taliban, idk how cogent or rational anyone who makes that kind of comment is. funny hee hee ha. to compare what minorities fought for to this is ignorance and insulting to minorities. okay find me a picture or a gays only bathroom.
I can show you places that won't serve gays. I can show you pictures of modern day beatings of gays. I can tell you that both groups have been kept down by ignorant people using holy texts as justification for their actions. I can tell you that the military actively segregates both groups due to "troop morale." I can tell you that the majority of voters in the south were also opposed to the civil rights movement, and it took judicial and executive action to move the country forward.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
distroying procreation is not a "move forward" action for the country. it shows that we are more focused on selfish and temporary satifaction. i glad the military does that to help hoosexuals out by assisting them focus on the reason they are there. and btw this country was formed and founded on holy text. and don't try to victimized gays because every can fit in that boat
The military? Please! There have been numerous journals on straight heterosexual soldiers harassing gays and women, and using DADT as cover. Focus on the reason indeed.
BTW: this country was NOT formed and founded on holy text. Most the Framers were deist, explicitly forbidded a gov't endorsed religion, and George Washington said that the US was in no way founded on the Christian religion.
@ElHermono damn, ofcourse because marriage and sex is all about making babies! Gosh, how could I forget? All these pleasurable feelings I get during sex is just selfish!! Next time I near climax I will think of how selfish I am being and call out for God ....like "Oh god!! oh god!"
Just because the discrimination doesn't play out exactly the same doesn't mean it doesn't exist. Are you also offended when Latinos or Native Americans or women ask for equal rights?
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Why does the fucking media insist on telling lies, you got MSNBC telling their lies and FOX telling theirs, fucking pisses me off, makes me not want to watch the news because they have their politcal agendas they need to throw at us. Our fucking media in this country is a disgrace. Oh and Keith Oberman is a sack of shit
The point that most opposers to gay marriage believe in is that the union of marriage is literally defined as being between a man and woman. That is a good point, but they fail to understand that as times change we redifine terms all the time, legal and sacred. It's time we took another look at our culture and made a few dicissions for our future. Do you want Uncle Sam with his hand in our personal lives or tolerance. Let homosexuals get married.
u know that all the verses he said were in the old testement aka the torrah which is clearly states in the new testement as outdated because of Jesus. (Matthew 5:17-20) however, there are plenty of verses in the new testement that say homosexuality is wrong period. Jesus says being homosexuals are wrong. period. (1 Corinthians 6:9-11)
There is no scripture in which Jesus condemns homosexuality.... However, later letters written by leaders of the church DID disparage homosexuality (such as in Romans and Corinthians)... as well as put severe limitations on the rights of women, slaves, and children.
But still, to say homosexuality is wrong, you have to also say women cannot hold positions of authority over men, that slavery is okay, and that people have no free choice (we're predestined).
i have read that stuf and for some reson i find it far fedht that the devil have nothing better to do than trun you gay and god dose not have enuf power to stop him and wit out god wed all bescrwing the same sex
You know, being against gay/lesbian marriage is what I am - but, to be honest, it's beside the point right now. This entire musical not only mocked what Scripture has to say about it, but mocked it in its entirety. This video will no longer just be a thorn in the side for those who oppose gay marriage...it will also, now, be offensive to all those who take the Bible seriously in any way. For people that wanted to get their point across, all they can be taken now is non-seriously. Their loss.
mabe you can help me i have a peoples mind and what the hell is up with opposeng gay marrige its not wright freedom of relgon is not foring you belfs on somone else why are crischin suprsd when other people defend there belfs and dont you think that a baby wod be better of addoted in a home of to gay men or women then in a home with a woman who wode have ratherd had an aborshen
and the comady thing how many times have you moked celbs
This is a Disgrace, these ppl are now making fun of the religon, not just the ppl. they take it in a wrong way, they think its funny, its actully serious. But these ppl are now immature.
But if the GLBT does get the right to marry, then what does that mean to them? Is it just so that they can be the same as their heterosexual counterparts in regards to the law, or does marriage actually mean something to them? Why even have marriage, if without it the GLBT will still do the same things they do now and still live with the people they love. What is the purpose of marriage?
There is of course the legal benefits (which include tax breaks, inheritance rights, spousal privilege, visitation rights, medical rights, etc.) but then there is also the emotional joy of being able to say "I'm married". There's a lot attached to that one word. The idea of monogamy, of faithfulness, of "till death do us part". Not only does the GLBT community want the legal rights but they also want to make that oh-so important vow to each other.
Equality, it does not affect us personally. they do not get the same rights, my marriage is valid in all 50 states, not theirs, how is that equal rights? Proud Brother Of A Gay Man
Marriage is the true expression of love for someone else. It's saying that they love them so much, that they're willing to bind themselves to them for the rest of their life. And while this practice is taken to lightly at times, the intent is still there. All homosexuals want is the legal right to bind themselves to each other the way heterosexuals do. And, on a lesser note, it also affords numerous legal rights they could not have outside of marriage, but that's beside the point.
I like how you put that. I am not against gay marriage, per se. I just don't want negative effects following from this for the rest of us. Case in point, the Catholic adoption center that closed down because it was unlawful for them to deny children to gay couples, for county clerks to be forced to give certificates even if they are morally opposed, and also the public denunciation of people who speak their beliefs, like Prejean from Miss America. There's a right way and a wrong way to do this.
All of what you say is true. No one can say that it will be an easy transition, but it's one that has to happen. This country was built on equality for all it's people. And while I'm saddened that some in this country see fit to deny the minority (gays in this case) their right to equality, we must look past this and do what is right. We cannot let the aggressive opinions of some of the people deter the rights of others.
I love Keith Olbermann! And, to leoscamera: you clearly don't understand sexuality. It's not something you choose. The rights that the GLBT community want are to be able to marry the people they are attracted to, which are people of the same gender. You already have the right to marry who YOU'RE attracted to. Understand?
well ware dose that get them just becase thay can marry another person thay dont love dosent mean thay get eqwal rights thes people were born with the nachal disire to love the same sex even so wodent that still be a wothless law wodent it be ezer to just let them marry
leoscamera: So....if there were a law that would state that a black person can't marry a white person, and that a white person can't marry a black person, then this would say anything about equal rights ? Maybe, but would the current US population approve it ? Don't think so. So what's the difference ?
in response to leoscamera a gay man dosent want to marry a straight man or a woman. and a straight man dosent want to marry a gay man or a lesbian. we want to have the right to marry who we love just like hetrosexual couples want and get to. it is true we have to right to get married as hetrosexual couples but not to who we love and want to be with. is it not only fair that we get given the same rights as people who are straight. love is never wrong
@yuu2bur DUDE. How did you know I slept with my mother!
LOL JK, you sound like such an idiot.
p.s. If gays men are attracted to other men, why would they sleep with/rape women, especially women they respect and love?
Caesey13 10 months ago
They should make a full leangh musical, that would be awsome
Soulmaka2 1 year ago
Yes.
YouAreAVeryBadMan 1 year ago
Jack Black as Jesus,EPIC!
thepoke3000 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Travel around the world with an Latino women rockmycity.info
wrrnlam 1 year ago
i agree you cant pick and chose the bible. bible says jesus is the only way to heaven. (better believe it)
whats the bible say about homosexuality--->1 cor 6:9-10, Do not be deceived: Neither the sexually immoral nor idolaters nor adulterers nor male prostitutes nor homosexual offenders will inherit the kingdom of God.
we will all stand before god on judgement day and all that will matter then is did you recieve jesus while you had the chance.
mocking god and the bible is not cool
mrcooldude964 1 year ago
@mrcooldude964 The Bible also says that you should cut off any body part that sins.
B01318183 1 year ago
@B01318183 thats not what jesus ment. he said if your eyes cause you to sin (example) looking at porn ect. then stop looking at porn before it causes you to fall away from god and seek living in sin.
mrcooldude964 1 year ago
@mrcooldude964 So, what you are doing is picking and choosing. You are choosing what to interpret, and what not to interpret.
B01318183 1 year ago
@B01318183 its cut and dry ---> 1 cor 6:9-10, Do you not know that the wicked will not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived: Neither the sexually immoral nor idolaters nor adulterers nor male prostitutes nor homosexual offenders will inherit the kingdom of God.
what more is there to say?
if homosexuals would turn from living in sin and recieve jesus. jesus would forgive them and welcome them into heaven
mrcooldude964 1 year ago
@mrcooldude964 It also says that you should stone your child death if he/she disobeys you. I could find more morality in Mein Kampf. And don't say that Jesus abolished that law because he actually criticized people for not killing there disobedient children(Mark 7:5-10).
B01318183 1 year ago
@B01318183 Bible don’t say disobey it says the child should be put to death if the child ==curses== his mother or father.
Mark 7:10,For Moses said, 'Honor your father and your mother, and, 'Anyone who curses his father or mother must be put to death.
But since the only testament we have new rules now. It’s funny how all the people that try to mock and belittle the bible always run to the Old Testament. Because you don’t want to hear john 3:16 (we don’t even live in the Old Testament)
mrcooldude964 1 year ago
@mrcooldude964 Mark is a New Testament book.
B01318183 1 year ago
@mrcooldude964 you forgot to mention those who wear polycotton blends, those who mark their bodies with tattoos (even if theyre religion related), those who love crayfish and mussels and those who shave/cut their beard will also not inhereit the kingdom of god.
I guess we'll just be hanging in the LGBT heaven with the seafood buffet and the lesbian pool party.
s2viv 1 year ago 2
@s2viv God did say to stay away from some things because they are not good for us but eating shell fish ect will not stop you from heaven. Only thing that will stop you from heaven is continuing to mock and reject Jesus and his word
mrcooldude964 1 year ago
@mrcooldude964-
And what makes you so sure that you're getting into Heaven? Personally, I'd take eternity in Hell when I die over spending a day in Heaven if it's filled with pompous assholes who get their kicks through religious hatred such as yourself.
Jpmadore1 1 year ago
@Jpmadore1 if only you know what you were saying, the time will come when you will understand hell is real. i just hope you see it before its to late, satan has your eyes totally blinded and each day your another day closer to hell and dont even have a clue you are
ask god to open your eyes before its to late for you
mrcooldude964 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@B01318183 thats not what jesus ment. he said if your eyes cause you to sin (example) looking at porn ect. then stop looking at porn before it causes you to fall away from god and seek living in sin.
mrcooldude964 1 year ago
@mrcooldude964 every culture has an origin myth, however it is only certain religions in which there are punishment/reward systems, omniscent personified deities and heirarchal human egocentricism. Before defending your own learnings as absolute understand the evolution of theology. if you had not been taught this story, you would not know it; however people do not pick their biology. assuming the meaning of a book you havent read is a danger, the word homosexual did not even exist at that time
tiemedown 1 year ago
a guy that came into my work was the person who directed this
FHplaya08 1 year ago
Neil Patrick Harris FTW
Swamoez0rs 1 year ago
<- a Catholic who thinks it's okay for people to love who they want to love! :O
Seriously, though, isn't there enough hatred and misery in the world? Why do we have to intentionally bring it on ourselves?
Oh and NPH ftw! :D
tenshinokuragari 1 year ago
He forgot Nicole Parker! D:
VexxxMaster69 1 year ago
prop 8 breeds hate--thumbs up if u agree!!!
GetOuterMySpace 1 year ago 4
um.. God Bless America?
Love, Canada
paperweight13 1 year ago
@paperweight13 yeah i know, they should really change that. hahaha lol
bluedog454 1 year ago
yay, margaret cho! :)
hollywoodsevil707 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Wow you faggot enablers love to say "Let gays get married and be as miserable as us"
Maybe if you read the fucking Bible and were a decent Christian you wouldn't be a miserable hellbound pile of crap
Just sayin'...
wankerpanther 1 year ago
@wankerpanther I thought Christians didn't curse? Or put anyone down? You sure are a 'decent' Christian yourself. Oh and I'm an Atheist, yet I'm happy and content. Hmmmm.... Seems someone's making rash judgements on others..... I bet the Bible has a few stories to tell on that.
MaskofTheTruth 1 year ago
@wankerpanther and maybe if you religious cult members walked away from your brainwashing sessions and used your own brain more you'd be better americans
just sayin'...
idaman12345 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
GOD HATES FAGS, BAN FAGGOT MARRIAGE
wankerpanther 1 year ago
YOU ARE STUPID OK?
luftair 1 year ago
@wankerpanther You honestly think god hates anyone? Are you sure you've even LOOKED at the bible?! It's pretty pathetic, because it's practacly plastered to the bible that god loves every living thing. Doesn't your mother make you memorize bible verses if you use that kind of language? Oops, obviously not >:P
WootPuppy2 1 year ago 13
@WootPuppy2 Have YOU looked at the bible?Half of that morbid fairy tale is nothing but who to kill and how to kill them, INCLUDING homosexuals (Lev.18:22), and handicapped people (Lev. 21:17-23). Exodus 35:2 states that anyone working on the sabbath day should be put to death. Lev. 25:44 states it's okay to have slaves.This is only a handful of horrible things in the bible! Love? Sounds more like hate is plastered on the bible
666GothDragon 1 year ago 2
@WootPuppy2 "Then I heard the LORD say to the other men, Show no mercy; have no pity! Kill them all – old and young, girls and women and little children. But do not touch anyone with the mark. Begin your task right here at the Temple." So they began by killing the seventy leaders. "Defile the Temple!" the LORD commanded. "Fill its courtyards with the bodies of those you kill! Go!" So they went throughout the city and did as they were told." (Ezekiel 9:5-7 NLT) yeah I think he does
Ulfvaldr2012 1 year ago
@WootPuppy2
All those who have supported the gay and lesbian marriages have some or the other time had fucked their their mother, sister or daughter hence want to first legalize same sex marriages and then legalize marriages between bother and sister, father and daughter, mother and son etc. Dont talk about the Bible as it says that God made a woman for a man, not a man for man. Also read Romans chapter 1 then you will know why God condems homosexuality.
yuu2bur 11 months ago
@yuu2bur
yep your right, gay marriage will probably lead to stuff like polygamy or incest. after all when interracial marriage was legalized people said it would open the doorway to gay marriage. its happening!
god only made a man and a woman to populate the earth with. last time i checked we didnt have that problem. and god said let there be incest.
according to romans gays are deserving of death. do you want to pass laws to kill homosexuals, like the truely christian nation of uganda?
AceofDiamonds0 11 months ago
@wankerpanther god isnt real, ban religion
idaman12345 1 year ago 2
@wankerpanther, nono, god hates you :D so go hate more people for who they are. and hate yourself too. also doesn't the bible teach to live and let live USE SOME COMMON SENSE!. you cant make gay people go away so why bother hating them, that's like hating a wooden post
pentica 1 year ago
LMFAO that was so funny =)
njfp1 1 year ago
"If gays want to marry and be miserable like the rest of us, I say we let them." -Peter Griffin
jewboy11505 1 year ago 32
@jewboy11505 Any person who actually marries out of PURE love, can never be miserable with his or her partner.
Abcdef1797 1 year ago
Prejudice is not the same as ABERRATION ...!
Who do You Want Guard Your Little "Lambs" a dog or a WOLF...?
chachapc007 2 years ago
oh....and jack black RULES!!!!
Rexfrivers 2 years ago
this is just my opinion. and i know this is about marriage. so i guess this is directed towards the anti-gay community.
but i think sex between a whore who has sex with a different guy every night is WAY more disgusting than sex between 2 gay men who love eachother.
Rexfrivers 2 years ago
what a wanker
wiseoneetest 2 years ago
what!?!?!?! he didn't mention jack black! the damn STAR and best performer in the damn video hahahahhah
FunAndRerunTv 2 years ago
WOW! Could this actually be an intelligent, peaceful, civil exchange in a YouTube comment section??? I'm not sure how to act. Where is the infantile namecalling and the clever, condescending remarks? The colorful metaphors and bad grammar are strangely absent! Are you guys in the right place???
Deke101 2 years ago
Deke101: Dude, that's funny! LMAO! I know it's a radical concept; sometimes you gotta stray way outside the lines. Good of you to notice. Peace
tonestar100 2 years ago
What about members of NAMBLA using the exact same arguments as homosexuals in order to gain traction in legislation and eventual acceptance?
Deke101 2 years ago
The right to marry does not apply to all. If it deed we wouldn't be at this site now. I am legally entitled to vote my conscience or belief whether it's based on The Bible or my belief in Unicorns. It's nobody's fucking business! Equally the same for gays. The rest is just pissing and moaning. Afterward.
tonestar100 2 years ago
You're laughing shame in the world of critical thinkers. I have studied the bible thoroughly with my collegues. Who made you the authority to shove you belief down other peoples' lives? Thomas Jefferson was right about people like you. Stay away from government because you will use it to shove your religious ideology and totalitarianism down the peoples' throat. Every has the right to be happy if it does not interfere with you. Take a few courses in ethics and crtical thinking.
Sonimmortal 2 years ago
Sonimmortal: Let me rephrase for intellectual honesty: My right to vote my beliefs, (religious or otherwise) and conscience is constitutionally protected. Thank Patrick Henry for working hard to promulgate through others, that thing called the Bill of Rights. You characterize my freedom to vote as "shoving my belief down other peoples lives." You've no idea how gay marriage would effect me. Let's be honest; you don't fucking care. BTW, I'm sure I have more than enough education to hang.
tonestar100 2 years ago
Very well and good point made. You do have the right to vote but understand that morality is an agreement between people in a society for the proper functioning of society so that everyone may enjoy, peace, happiness, and freedom. If a happiness wrongs another individual, then it cannot be accepted as moral conduct condusive to those desired things we call peace, happiness, and freedom. Now, with all due respect, explain how gay marriage hinders anyone of those things?
Sonimmortal 2 years ago
Sonimmortal: Well, this sounds egalitarian in nature to me. Assuming arguendo your morality model, can we agree we can't legislate this "morality?" If we were to design a new society, perhaps. If the historical, traditional definition of "marriage" were expanded to include gay marriage, I would be deeply wounded and offended emotionally, and spiritually. It's patently offensive to my core beliefs. Apart from well-settled law, defining marriage as between man and woman, the Bible's my authority.
tonestar100 2 years ago
There are many things that offend us whether emotionally, visually, spiritually, or mentally but there is a fine line when it comes to freedom and the denial of it. I understand your view. When it comes to freedom, there has to be a standard by which we determine morality in society that fights for freedom. I personally don't like the idea of homosexuality but I do defend there right to freedom. It is here where we must make the decision to follow faith or reason. Have you read Immanuel Kant
Sonimmortal 2 years ago
Sonimmortal: Because that right to vote individually is sacrosanct, and is inherently subjective, attacking those who vote accordingly is contrary to that sacred constitutional right. That's what the sites cater to; attacking those who have lawfully exercised a guaranteed right. Attacking someone for that can never be condoned. Yet that's what has happened, including attacking Mormons, campaign contributors. Talk about conduct which society must reject. I offer that example.
tonestar100 2 years ago
Tonestar100, please realize that my argument wasn't on the right to vote. I respect that from everyone. I was arguing on the stance of prop 8 and it validity as an argument. You are correct. Attacking the right to vote should never be condoned.
Sonimmortal 2 years ago
Sonimmortal: My thanks to you as well. Wonderful exchange.
tonestar100 2 years ago
Sonimmortal: A definition for your reference to "freedom" would be helpful here. I've read Kant with regard to natural law, Jefferson and his attachment to the Enlightenment movement around the time he was to succeed Patrick Henry. I do get his philosophical construct to which you alluded in man-made religion free of a diety. Just the definiition of Deists brings it's own propblems.
tonestar100 2 years ago
When you get the time, read Kant in regards to Morality and Ethics. I think you'll understand where i'm coming from. Kant is one of the very few philosopher that actually reasoned the existence of God which makes him very interesting when he writes about morality and ethics. Of course he wasn't choosing a certain religious persuasion or domination but it makes you think.
Sonimmortal 2 years ago
Sonimmortal: Based on Kant's formulations, (moral imperatives) how would Prop 8 yes or no satisfy his criteria?
tonestar100 2 years ago
I believe you refer to Categorical and Hypothetical imperatives. Kant's stated that Categorical Imperative determines whether an act is morally permissible if it can be made into a universal law. Example: If would-be thieves were contemplating stealing from another person, they would choose not to because to do so would mean they are perfectly fine with another stealing from them as well. Simply put a person should act according to what they would like to see as a universal moral law. So...
Sonimmortal 2 years ago
In regards to Prop 8, because the issue for gays is happiness, recognition and rights that comes with being married, the categorical imperative would be to vote in favor of gay-marriage because to deny happiness and certain rights would create the universal law that denying happiness and rights to those who oppose is morally acceptable also. I understand that allowing gay marriage will offend many but so did the ending of slavery. Yet, I admit this one is much more complicated.
Sonimmortal 2 years ago
Sonimmortal: It seems to be a very delicate paradigm, virtually in opposite to our American judicial system. We live in a society whereby everyone's ox is continually being gored.
tonestar100 2 years ago
Sonimmortal: Regarding Prop 8 much of the problem is a function of who is defining the issue. Prop 8 supporters want the historical and traditional definition to remain undisturbed as it has been since gaining statehood and the founding of our country for that matter. I think the better course would be for gays to truly learn to love themselves and not require the "label" of marriage. I believe if every legal benefit were conferred through civil union, the'yd still demand marriage.
tonestar100 2 years ago
I love my gay friends :)
love not hate
seriously. dont be hatin :D
no body will ever stop love
you cant stop love.
SerenityDarling1 2 years ago
Funny, those who worship their cock gods of sodomy and their labial lordesses of lesbos accuse others of " picking and choosing"....when it is the Homosexual that 'picks and chooses" to wallow in the the rectal anal glands of other men, when it is the lesbian that picks and chooses to worship at the labial altar of lesbianism. Pick and choose indeed
wiseoneetest 2 years ago
wtf? and straight people never have anal sex? dumbshit
Rexfrivers 2 years ago 2
Comment removed
ElHermono 2 years ago
@Rexfrivers that not the point.
ElHermono 1 year ago
Christian American.....YOU PICK AND CHOOSE
citoyenjoseph 2 years ago
Honestly, how much money would really be made? I would like to see the statistic on how many gays want to get married and how much they'll spend on their wedding, and how much of that money will go to the state of California.
BMason3604 2 years ago
he missed out Sarah Chalke
undeadboll 2 years ago
qweqwe
qeqweqweqweqeqwe 2 years ago
ssssssssssss
qeqweqweqweqeqwe 2 years ago
xaxa
qeqweqweqweqeqwe 2 years ago
Comment removed
qeqweqweqweqeqwe 2 years ago
Comment removed
qeqweqweqweqeqwe 2 years ago
daa
qeqweqweqweqeqwe 2 years ago
d qwe qw
qeqweqweqweqeqwe 2 years ago
xaxaxaa
qeqweqweqweqeqwe 2 years ago
Let the gays marry already.
MrTabby5000 2 years ago
no way
ElHermono 2 years ago
wtf mate?
lilsparky97 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
holy shit fuck this liberal bullshit
funkkiller 2 years ago
What makes me mad is that people are judging people by their genetic make up. And there really isnt anything anyone can do about it. and the whole, it is going to be teached in school crap, it is already there. my best friend is gay, and he is so easy to talk to about female problems. I wonder if people who voted yes on prop 8 even knew people who are GLT?
Virgostar285 2 years ago
That's funny because research shows that things such as sexual abuse can change someones sexual preference.
Im not saying it's choice, but saying it's 100% genetic is just......bullshit.
PtH888999 2 years ago
Comment removed
Virgostar285 2 years ago
Comment removed
Virgostar285 2 years ago
Comment removed
Virgostar285 2 years ago
Obama is an abomintion. Can he ruin this country ? Yes he can!
SHAKACONIFY 2 years ago
bush ruinED our country
lilsparky97 2 years ago
Comment removed
ElHermono 2 years ago
"Civil Rights" that is a biased one sided statement.
dacatholicbandorgan 2 years ago
not realy :l
lilsparky97 2 years ago
It is so. Look up "How I can vote yes on 8 and be tolerant".
dacatholicbandorgan 2 years ago
I'v been searching for a srtrat answer on why gay marge is wrong and so far god is all i got our country was built on separation of church and state :l wrong to
lilsparky97 2 years ago
Seporation from Church and State does not mean seporation of Church From State.
I know of a couple of Pro-Life Atheists on YouTube, i'm sure you'll find pro-traditional Marriage one's to.
dacatholicbandorgan 2 years ago
then why don't we make churches pay tax?
being Pro-Life is a diff matter theres acsholy an exuse for that being wrong aside form jebuz
excuse my spelling I'm to bizzy suding science and politics to care
lilsparky97 2 years ago
Hooray for delusion!
EikC 2 years ago
Hooray for yours!
dacatholicbandorgan 2 years ago
You're the homophobe trying to rationalize your prejudices, not me.
EikC 2 years ago
You're the moralconservativechirstianpeoplehavetherighttovotefortraditionalmarriageophobe trying to terribly and uneducatedly prove your point.
dacatholicbandorgan 2 years ago
You know, slavery was "traditional", too. The people who support Prop 8 are all bigoted, close-minded Christians. It's interesting how they talk about "preserving marriage". You know that the divorce rate in the United States is about 40%, right? So I think the proponents of "traditional" marriage are doing their part to destroy its "traditional" meaning, too. You know, one man one woman till death do us part, lest it be adultery? But Gays, no, they can't marry because the BIBLE says blah blah..
EikC 2 years ago
LOL this is so funny.
and so accurate!
joenic40 2 years ago
to the man offended that this is compared to civil rights. OK. They ARE civil rights, though. MLK and Coretta had openly gay people on their staff and specifically supported their rights, AND NAACP head Julian Bond was just the headline speaker at the National Equality March in D.C. this weekend. His words? this IS about civil rights.
audlindal 2 years ago 2
so gays couldn't vote when, or had to use separate bathrooms when? there were way more lynchings because of race than sexual orientation, it's not the same.God Bless.
wrassleman 2 years ago 2
how many lynchings does it take to make them bad? one? a dozen? 100? the countryside?.
Way to bring God into to. He does. Thanks for checking though. My extended family was wiped out in the Holocaust. I wouldn't say that gLBT discrimination was equal to that, but I would agree that both are demeaning, degrading, and shameful.
audlindal 2 years ago 2
gays don't use separate bathrooms, but they are prohibited from being at their dying partner's bedsides (not blood relatives), and are the only category of hate crime on the rise (all other categories declined). There are 515 rights specifically denied gay partners that their hetero alter egos enjoy. Miscegnation was an issue in the 1960s depending on the state you lived in. Today, I could lose custody of my kids depending on which state I live in.
audlindal 2 years ago
So no, I'm not sent to a homo only bathroom. But there are threats to me and my family much more pressing than that. Hate crimes and I'm a target any time I walk down the street with my partner, as are my kids. Denial of access to partners in hospitals and lack of equal protection under the law.
audlindal 2 years ago
that's probably enough for now. I don't get why as a member of a group that has suffered horrible discrimination that you would seek to do the same to another group. And why are you kicking this up, posting on this page anyway?
God Bless, and peace be upon you.
audlindal 2 years ago
Obama-nation!
RoronoaZor0 2 years ago
as a black man, who lives in the south, and whose father grew up during segregation, it is insulting to my intelligence to compare the civil rights movement, to gay rights. and to talk about intolerance and not mention idk, crap like touch, the classic movie, saved, hamlet 2, and the king of craptastic flicks. funny, he he ha. you're welcome ,and it's been you're pleasure.
wrassleman 2 years ago
Julian Bond, head of the NAACP, was a keynote speaker at the National Equality March on Washington D.C. this past weekend. Funny, the head of the NAACP insists this IS all about Civil Rights.
Church weddings and Civil marriage licenses are not required to be tied together. The marriage license is a legal document that guarantees its owners certain civil rights. They can't be denied to a class of its citizens.
audlindal 2 years ago
and he has also, compared bush 43's judicial nominees to the taliban, idk how cogent or rational anyone who makes that kind of comment is. funny hee hee ha. to compare what minorities fought for to this is ignorance and insulting to minorities. okay find me a picture or a gays only bathroom.
wrassleman 2 years ago
I can show you places that won't serve gays. I can show you pictures of modern day beatings of gays. I can tell you that both groups have been kept down by ignorant people using holy texts as justification for their actions. I can tell you that the military actively segregates both groups due to "troop morale." I can tell you that the majority of voters in the south were also opposed to the civil rights movement, and it took judicial and executive action to move the country forward.
audlindal 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
distroying procreation is not a "move forward" action for the country. it shows that we are more focused on selfish and temporary satifaction. i glad the military does that to help hoosexuals out by assisting them focus on the reason they are there. and btw this country was formed and founded on holy text. and don't try to victimized gays because every can fit in that boat
ElHermono 2 years ago
Homosexuals can't destroy procreation. .
The military? Please! There have been numerous journals on straight heterosexual soldiers harassing gays and women, and using DADT as cover. Focus on the reason indeed.
BTW: this country was NOT formed and founded on holy text. Most the Framers were deist, explicitly forbidded a gov't endorsed religion, and George Washington said that the US was in no way founded on the Christian religion.
How much more clear could they have been.
Savior20061 2 years ago 2
if this country was formed and founded by this "holy text" then we would all be forced to follow it
idaman12345 1 year ago
@ElHermono damn, ofcourse because marriage and sex is all about making babies! Gosh, how could I forget? All these pleasurable feelings I get during sex is just selfish!! Next time I near climax I will think of how selfish I am being and call out for God ....like "Oh god!! oh god!"
Charmedlassie18 1 year ago
@Charmedlassie18 HA HA HA! Finally you understand what i'm saying!
ElHermono 1 year ago
Just because the discrimination doesn't play out exactly the same doesn't mean it doesn't exist. Are you also offended when Latinos or Native Americans or women ask for equal rights?
audlindal 2 years ago
really, really? i can see you are grasping at straws so God Bless.
wrassleman 2 years ago
grasping at straws?
seriously?
according to your logic, because we are not in the 1960's and don't have separate bathrooms, discrimination doesn't exist?
DADT and DOMA. Arkansas used to ban interracial adoption and now they ban gay adoption.
Some parishes in Louisiana still won't marry interracial couples (you can search today's AP for articles) and NONE of them will marry gay couples.
audlindal 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Why does the fucking media insist on telling lies, you got MSNBC telling their lies and FOX telling theirs, fucking pisses me off, makes me not want to watch the news because they have their politcal agendas they need to throw at us. Our fucking media in this country is a disgrace. Oh and Keith Oberman is a sack of shit
vicelar 2 years ago
That guy in the orange shirt is kinda cute... ^_^
hollywoodsevil707 2 years ago 4
The point that most opposers to gay marriage believe in is that the union of marriage is literally defined as being between a man and woman. That is a good point, but they fail to understand that as times change we redifine terms all the time, legal and sacred. It's time we took another look at our culture and made a few dicissions for our future. Do you want Uncle Sam with his hand in our personal lives or tolerance. Let homosexuals get married.
AnotherMasterMind 2 years ago 7
I like to see how my comments have gotten such disapproval. In doing so, you people have only furthered my point.
orion7763 2 years ago
I'm christian. And I do believe in true love and freedom.
Y'know, I think this is a bit irrelevant. If a couple decides to love each other, you guys shouldn't care about it.
guitarraelectrica 2 years ago 6
jack is jesus!
akatsukimaster666 2 years ago 2
This has been flagged as spam show
u know that all the verses he said were in the old testement aka the torrah which is clearly states in the new testement as outdated because of Jesus. (Matthew 5:17-20) however, there are plenty of verses in the new testement that say homosexuality is wrong period. Jesus says being homosexuals are wrong. period. (1 Corinthians 6:9-11)
(Romans 1:18-32)
mofoeatmy556 2 years ago
Irrelevant. The bible has no place in legislature in the first place.
acordian 2 years ago 6
There is no scripture in which Jesus condemns homosexuality.... However, later letters written by leaders of the church DID disparage homosexuality (such as in Romans and Corinthians)... as well as put severe limitations on the rights of women, slaves, and children.
But still, to say homosexuality is wrong, you have to also say women cannot hold positions of authority over men, that slavery is okay, and that people have no free choice (we're predestined).
jiffer1785 2 years ago 5
My friend in junior high voted yes on prop 8. (sigh) Ya think you know a guy.
hall9111 2 years ago
How? You have to be at least 18 to vote.
Hippolf 2 years ago
He''s in college now. Sorry, I ment that he was my friend back in Junior high.
hall9111 2 years ago
omg this is amazing! i hope no one gets offended by this video....how could you? its a great!
shelby6413 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Hey there, JuliusFriday...
If you ARE Catholic...
And you ARE a liberal...
And you DO support gay marriage...
Then maybe you should be reading your Bible more, like a Catholic should...
You'll find many teachings in your Bible contrary to what you believe.
adandac 2 years ago
i have read that stuf and for some reson i find it far fedht that the devil have nothing better to do than trun you gay and god dose not have enuf power to stop him and wit out god wed all bescrwing the same sex
lilsparky97 2 years ago
You know, being against gay/lesbian marriage is what I am - but, to be honest, it's beside the point right now. This entire musical not only mocked what Scripture has to say about it, but mocked it in its entirety. This video will no longer just be a thorn in the side for those who oppose gay marriage...it will also, now, be offensive to all those who take the Bible seriously in any way. For people that wanted to get their point across, all they can be taken now is non-seriously. Their loss.
adandac 2 years ago
mabe you can help me i have a peoples mind and what the hell is up with opposeng gay marrige its not wright freedom of relgon is not foring you belfs on somone else why are crischin suprsd when other people defend there belfs and dont you think that a baby wod be better of addoted in a home of to gay men or women then in a home with a woman who wode have ratherd had an aborshen
and the comady thing how many times have you moked celbs
lilsparky97 2 years ago
This is a Disgrace, these ppl are now making fun of the religon, not just the ppl. they take it in a wrong way, they think its funny, its actully serious. But these ppl are now immature.
goarmy18 2 years ago
i hope i can get married in my hometown one day...
Wilso850 2 years ago 4
Comment removed
Wilso850 2 years ago
Comment removed
emsmalee 2 years ago
See, the GLBT wants the right to marry the person they love, just as you have done. They do not have the right to do this now. Is that equal?
CommentGirl2 2 years ago
But if the GLBT does get the right to marry, then what does that mean to them? Is it just so that they can be the same as their heterosexual counterparts in regards to the law, or does marriage actually mean something to them? Why even have marriage, if without it the GLBT will still do the same things they do now and still live with the people they love. What is the purpose of marriage?
orion7763 2 years ago
There is of course the legal benefits (which include tax breaks, inheritance rights, spousal privilege, visitation rights, medical rights, etc.) but then there is also the emotional joy of being able to say "I'm married". There's a lot attached to that one word. The idea of monogamy, of faithfulness, of "till death do us part". Not only does the GLBT community want the legal rights but they also want to make that oh-so important vow to each other.
CommentGirl2 2 years ago 3
Equality, it does not affect us personally. they do not get the same rights, my marriage is valid in all 50 states, not theirs, how is that equal rights? Proud Brother Of A Gay Man
snaprunner1948 2 years ago
Marriage is the true expression of love for someone else. It's saying that they love them so much, that they're willing to bind themselves to them for the rest of their life. And while this practice is taken to lightly at times, the intent is still there. All homosexuals want is the legal right to bind themselves to each other the way heterosexuals do. And, on a lesser note, it also affords numerous legal rights they could not have outside of marriage, but that's beside the point.
cancerboy153 2 years ago 2
I like how you put that. I am not against gay marriage, per se. I just don't want negative effects following from this for the rest of us. Case in point, the Catholic adoption center that closed down because it was unlawful for them to deny children to gay couples, for county clerks to be forced to give certificates even if they are morally opposed, and also the public denunciation of people who speak their beliefs, like Prejean from Miss America. There's a right way and a wrong way to do this.
orion7763 2 years ago
All of what you say is true. No one can say that it will be an easy transition, but it's one that has to happen. This country was built on equality for all it's people. And while I'm saddened that some in this country see fit to deny the minority (gays in this case) their right to equality, we must look past this and do what is right. We cannot let the aggressive opinions of some of the people deter the rights of others.
cancerboy153 2 years ago
The problem is they are "morally opposed". Are they opposed based on any empirical evidence? No. They just don't like the fags.
Maybe I'm morally opposed to straight people adopting. Does it mean I have a right to deny them a certificate?
No. the problem with you social conservatives is that you pretend you are the victims when really you just love the status quo and social control.
Savior20061 2 years ago 2
I have nothing to say to you, or frankly, anybody on this board.
orion7763 2 years ago
Goodbye then.
Savior20061 2 years ago
your taking way to personal
ElHermono 2 years ago
Religion is getting in the way of freedom. It's bullshit.
macabreminds 2 years ago 4
no their rights are not equal, not if they cant get married, so yes this is a fight, a just fight, for equal rights.
0yk 2 years ago
I love Keith Olbermann! And, to leoscamera: you clearly don't understand sexuality. It's not something you choose. The rights that the GLBT community want are to be able to marry the people they are attracted to, which are people of the same gender. You already have the right to marry who YOU'RE attracted to. Understand?
MistressRebekah 2 years ago
Well no. If I don't want to marry your partner then we wouldn't be "partners"
Tusk26 2 years ago
I'm assuming you are heterosexual? If that is the case then you have the right to marry your partner. I do not have that right. That is unequal.
Tusk26 2 years ago 3
well ware dose that get them just becase thay can marry another person thay dont love dosent mean thay get eqwal rights thes people were born with the nachal disire to love the same sex even so wodent that still be a wothless law wodent it be ezer to just let them marry
lilsparky97 2 years ago
leoscamera: So....if there were a law that would state that a black person can't marry a white person, and that a white person can't marry a black person, then this would say anything about equal rights ? Maybe, but would the current US population approve it ? Don't think so. So what's the difference ?
Fl0w3rtje 2 years ago
we all should believe in love,
and thereforse all should believe that love>any other reason againest gay marriage
so basically, let everyone get married, to let everyone experience love.
sophilianate 2 years ago 3
to tru [<:
lilsparky97 2 years ago
in response to leoscamera a gay man dosent want to marry a straight man or a woman. and a straight man dosent want to marry a gay man or a lesbian. we want to have the right to marry who we love just like hetrosexual couples want and get to. it is true we have to right to get married as hetrosexual couples but not to who we love and want to be with. is it not only fair that we get given the same rights as people who are straight. love is never wrong
monniemonster 2 years ago
hope that didnt come across as an angry response because it wasnt. :)
monniemonster 2 years ago
It's self explanatory. And if that's how you're going to message me, then don't expect a response.
segasarecool123 2 years ago
suck a dick }:[
lilsparky97 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
I highly doubt that Keith Olbermann has studied the bible to find what he claims here. And these are the people we trust with our information.
segasarecool123 2 years ago
the hell is that sopost to mean
lilsparky97 2 years ago 2
ANSER ME FSM DAM IT!!!!
lilsparky97 2 years ago
come on people it seems like a no braner to me gays shod be aloed to marry
THE END!!!!!!!!!!
lilsparky97 2 years ago 3