horrobly in acurate, the take off length was much longer, unless you are showing that they have a 50 mph head wind. the plane didn't flex that much, flew faster, flew longer distance. if you are to make a simulation, at least research what you are animating.
@engineer636 Thanks for your horribly inaccurate comment. The real experts said it did take longer to get off the rail and that the wings were canted down instead of up, but the distance and speed is about right based on timing and flight distance. Which flight are you talking about? And how in hell can you say how much it flexed? Also, your attitude is offensive and not appreciated.
@engineer636 Thanks for your horribly inaccurate comment. The real experts said it did take longer to get off the rail and that the wings were canted down instead of up, but the distance and speed is about right based on timing and flight distance. Which flight are you talking about? And how can you say how much it flexed? Also, your attitude is offensive and not appreciated.
I was assuming the actual flight was somewhat removed from the buildings, maybe that wasn't true. And a person who should know more about it than I, said it left near the end of the rail instead of where I showed it at approx 1/3. Thanks for your comments. John
The Animation is nice. But it is just an animation, everybody knows the real flyer could not take off and fly.
A1n3dr5e1234567890 4 months ago
horrobly in acurate, the take off length was much longer, unless you are showing that they have a 50 mph head wind. the plane didn't flex that much, flew faster, flew longer distance. if you are to make a simulation, at least research what you are animating.
engineer636 10 months ago
@engineer636 Thanks for your horribly inaccurate comment. The real experts said it did take longer to get off the rail and that the wings were canted down instead of up, but the distance and speed is about right based on timing and flight distance. Which flight are you talking about? And how in hell can you say how much it flexed? Also, your attitude is offensive and not appreciated.
JOHNINAUSTIN2004 10 months ago
@engineer636 Thanks for your horribly inaccurate comment. The real experts said it did take longer to get off the rail and that the wings were canted down instead of up, but the distance and speed is about right based on timing and flight distance. Which flight are you talking about? And how can you say how much it flexed? Also, your attitude is offensive and not appreciated.
JOHNINAUSTIN2004 10 months ago
I love this animation. Makes you feel as if you were there. Excellent for showing students who are learning about the Wright Brothers.
pshapiro 1 year ago
Thanks, warp13,
I was assuming the actual flight was somewhat removed from the buildings, maybe that wasn't true. And a person who should know more about it than I, said it left near the end of the rail instead of where I showed it at approx 1/3. Thanks for your comments. John
JOHNINAUSTIN2004 2 years ago
Very nice, the only things I'd like to point out, and this is just for comment:
Adding the hanger and work shed buildings.
Another thing that i am not sure of, what rail do you show the Flyer leaving the rail on?
warp13 2 years ago