Mitchell & Webb - Assassination of princess Diana

[KapStuf]

That's why they killed Michael Jackson. 'Cos it was really *his* lovechild.

Either that or the inebriati meant to kill Michael Jordan, but had slightly more than slightly less than two glasses of wine.

[MatthiasAletharch]

What's so great about this is the audience's shocked laughter as Rob mentions getting the chauffeur drunk and they all realise exactly where the sketch is going.

[koosk41]

This is all the proof the Daily Express needed all those years ago.

[knightofgold]

totally brilliant

[FandPrulethesky]

Every line of this is delivered so perfictly

[AIDSplz]

"If she's left alive to age as gracefully as one can whilst raising the bastard grandchild of a delusional Egyptian businessman..."

Classic Mitchell

[wheelmanstan]

Funny but it's deeper than that. And Prince Philip is a lunatic, I mean he did once say "if reincarnated I want to return as a killer virus to lower population levels".

[XSilvenX]

Not to mention the causality and reasoning for killing Diana discussed and made fun of here are nowhere near the same potential reasons that brought about the skepticism in the first place. This is just food for the sheep. Go to sleep everyone.

Trust me, there are no conspiracies and if you ask questions in regard to shady details on ANYTHING you're a tinfoil hatter lunatic.

-Your president.

[priesty111]

@XSilvenX But.. don't you know? If this is a true conspiracy theory, then ALL conspiracy theories must also be true!?!?!?!!!! Which means............ the government are watching you RIGHT NOW. Quick! Hide! And make sure to delete your browsing history!!!

You're such a mug hahahahahaha :D

[XSilvenX]

@priesty111 Ah yes, the straw man. Please continue attacking it because nothing you said has any shred of relevance to what I said, you're just another ignorant who thinks he knows what he's talking about when in reality you most likely haven't done a shred of research into the subject matter. These videos are made for people like you. Eat it up and continue to live in your bubble. Turn on that CNN and BBC and continue to believe the UK and U.S. are fighting for democracy. "hahahahahaha :D"

[priesty111]

@XSilvenX Yeah, you're right. They're not fighting for democracy, they're fighting for despotism! Vive la resistance!

[XSilvenX]

Regardless of whether or not there's a legitimate verdict out in regard to the actual reality of what happened that day, why do people think just because there's a satirical skit on something in favor of non-conspiracy that it's automatically not valid skepticism? Do some of you people understand that the mentality is still sheepish? Not to mention this is on BBC, another propaganda channel alongside CNN, NBC and Fox. I bet you most of the people here haven't even investigated the issue. Morons.

[GGov86]

@XSilvenX Googling other retards is not investigation, you know. I'm assuming you haven't actually had access to anything even remotely related to the case, which makes your "investigation" just a circle-jerk of paranoia and ignorance with other like-minded prats.

[baadshepherd]

@XSilvenX Someone is full of themselves, and wrong, with a lack of information to boot. Seems to me that you have no direct access to any information outside of what the rest of us have but you pretend to it. Being as you have no direct observations, i.e. you watching the accident, the idea of superposition comes to my mind. Look up Schrodinger's cat. You cannot know the reality and so any guess you happen to wager is wrong without actual evidence. But we are the confused ones.

[XSilvenX]

@baadshepherd Yet with the same air of arrogance you're assuming the opposite. There is no concrete proof of either and you automatically assume because it's the official story (and of course with appeal to authority) that what they say is true even though there is reason to believe otherwise; not to say there is concrete evidence outside of a few shoddy details and speculation of course. The idea here is, nobody knows shit and to act concretely either way is unscientific. 

[XSilvenX]

@baadshepherd You made a good point and I'm glad you brought it up but it's somewhat hypocritical the same rules don't apply to your argument don't you think? What makes you 100% certain that it happened exactly as the media has it and what makes you so quick to write off what the speculation says? Governments lie all the time and silly things like this (especially with the BBC propaganda tag) should be taken lightly. Parody is extremely powerful as an stigmatization tool and they know it.

[baadshepherd]

@XSilvenX I see no reasonable excuse for an assassination attempt to go through all that trouble. You just do the Lee Harvey Oswald thing, easy solution. I argue against your point because it is needlessly difficult, why go through more effort than is necessary? Conspiracies require too many people and too many steps, if I where someone who wanted Princess Di killed, I would simply have hired a hitman, blamed a crazy scapegoat, then killed the hitman. Minimum of exposure to risk.

[Jcolinsol]

@baadshepherd

The most popular method of assassination these days, seems to be the old "tragic plane crash". Conspiracies happen all the time, its normal primate behavior.

[Treblaine]

@XSilvenX Oh, so we can't just accept information relayed through multiple independent and corroborated news agencies on an investigation by French Authorities. Yes, this may come as a surprise to you but it was not the BBC who investigated the crash, it was those hard-nut French cops.

Why the fuck would the anti-monarchist French government lie for the English Royal family? The BBC can't lie to the ENTIRE WORLD without CNN or any other news agency picking up on that. The reports are published.

[JoshHPrimrose]

I assume the chauffeur is one of the inebriati, then?

[evildogheretic]

@JoshHPrimrose it gets deeper :O

[Coolfundylan2]

@JoshHPrimrose No, he must've had two glasses. If he had just 1 1/2, like the inebriati, he would've done incredibly well

[ISTAYUPLATE]

@JoshHPrimrose He couldn't have been a member of the inebriait, since the chauffeur will be having more than slightly less than two drinks.

[rbdzntsfrlk]

@ISTAYUPLATE You forget, those who die for the Inebriati are annulled from that rule upon the fact their mission requires their death.

[ISTAYUPLATE]

@rbdzntsfrlk touche'

[rbdzntsfrlk]

@ISTAYUPLATE Lol

[illevenlickthegravy]

@ISTAYUPLATE Mindfuck this my friend: slightly less than two drinks to make sure that it's the greatest accidental car crash or more than two drinks to actually make it a go wrong and become a car crash? BWOOOOOOM!

[ISTAYUPLATE]

@illevenlickthegravy Mind is blown.

[chrisjg210]

@JoshHPrimrose no, cause then he would find driving easier

[jkbraden]

Agreed



[dacoolray]

They should do one of these for 9/11 conspiracists.

[Just1Micky]

@dacoolray They work for the BBC, I don't think it'd be good business wise for them to do something mocking the integrity and reliability of the propaganda machine.