haha why is there just ATI OR Nvidia for you. My system runs with a radeon 5850 for normal graphics and a Geforce 8800gt for physx. Best way to get perfect performance for little money.
"in a year or two physics will be much better than just stacking crates on top of another" its been 3 years and nothing!! i hope physics do become a part in games
"Special type of physics processing" or "completely wrong physics". Stokes/Navier are rolling in their graves!!
All these physics fluid demos are hilariously wrong. Call me back when you can emulate a simple wood block being pulled along a wooden board, hint f=u_sN, f=u_kN. It is pleasant to look at though...
you can use physx on an ati card, it just defaults the physics calculations onto the cpu.
The confusion stems from the fact that Nvidia physx is more than one thing, it is a) a physics engine and b) a method of calculating any physics on the GPU.
with an ati card all of this fluid simulation would run, but it would run slowly and on the cpu.
i get a warning saying: "unable to find a PhysX card, or physX being used by other application." ive got a GT 240 which supports physX, do i need to download a diffrent driver, i updated my drivers from the website
@Bananadine dude, the entire point of video cards and physx processing cards is EFFECTS.
Thats it.
And in case you failed a basic logic course in school, interactions between player and fluid, or player and cloth... That is PURELY physics based effects, and yes, you need powerful hardware to run those types of interactions. A nintendo 64 could never render the type of cloth effects seen in any newer game.
Your post manages to fail 3 times in a row just to make a single (incorrect) point.
The type of interactions you are speaking of ARE physics based. Thing A impacts thing B, thing B moves.
You never said anything about deleting "a cloth, in a building game". That has nothing to do with phyics, and requires zero calculation other than telling the software to remove it from sight.
Physics, in terms of what you are speaking of ARE JUST EFFECTS. A piece of a cloak brushing over a character's ankles. Effect. Leaves = effect. They dont enhance gameplay.
@MastaSquidge if "hardware" in this context weren't needed then nVidia as we know it wouldn't exist, and this video wouldn't exist, and we wouldn't be talking
whether what I actually meant was right or wrong, you're way behind and I've lost interest
@Bananadine I am talking about the hardware needed to run these "simulations". This hardware is also needed when you start talking about complex physical interactions between a player character and fluids, such as water or oil, complex realistic cloth interactions. Realistic bullet deflection. The list goes on and on, but the point is that a CPU IS NOT POWERFUL ENOUGH TO DO THIS ALONE.
You are talking about physical interactions and how they shouldnt need dedicated cards. But they do.
@Bananadine Any sort of "deep interaction" between a player and anything requires calculations. Anything which involves any form of contact based movements is physics calculation.
You say that your examples of cloth and fluid require no special hardware, yet until the primary processor is powerful enough to do the required calculation, this hardware is in fact required.
Why? Because those two things are PHYSICS BASED INTERACTION!
@ROBLOXingHabbo Yes, however that is beside the point. I was remarking what the new usage for this technology would probably be with the direction of the internet, momentum travels, the momentum of the internet is pointed towards porn. Tentacle hentai to be precise.
wander if they would be able to make the water start bubbling why and reacts to temperature. they make sand look very easy to make on this even though they didnt have it. hope they add wind to physics too, not sure if it would be hard or easy to make
A question: what physics program may be used to create ,for example, that alien creature, with all its movements and stuff??...it looks quiet impressive actually!:)
Now, moving back to the topic of the PS3 processor and a PC one, or indeed mine, if you still want to make the comparison. A PS3 cell processor only has 1 fully functioning 'main' core, another core, as you stated, is not run for reliability measures and a further 2 are not even used for processing in games AT ALL. The processor in a PS3 is more comparable to an Intel Atom than more sophisticated i7 and Phenom 2 models.
@no1doesitlikeme the 2 cores that aren't used for the games is for the ps3 OS. its a vector processor with the PPC architecture so its not really similar to anything x86 based. but, since it is still considered a CPU, its processing capabilities are comparable, and its capable of processing more than cheap i7s, or just about any phenom II. like i said, i'm an amd fan. but the whole reason i said anything in the first place is to show ps3 is not rubbish
@schmidtbag Now as far as this argument goes, I could carry on forever talking about core architecture, out of order processing, all sorts, and you would carry on forever and we would both be very bored people. I could also go the other way and say that I wasn't going to bother arguing anymore, in which case, you would almost definitely tell me that I had 'lost the argument. I really have to go for dinner now. It was nice discussing matters with you, however I wont be replying anymore. Goodbye.
Yes, I understand the purpose of quoting. But it would seem apparent that the quote you made, didn't have a purpose. You just randomly decided to take a sentence that I said and recite it back to me, without explaining what the point was. And ok, I have read back through this ridiculous argument, had a little think, as you told me, and still have come to no reasonable conclusion as to how I am a hypocrite. Please, elaborate and explain.
@no1doesitlikeme i quoted you because i was trying to point out how you said sp3 is rubbish when it really isn't. i'm not sure how thats a difficult concept to grasp. i said you were a hypocrite for calling me stupid, when at the time, you decided not to argue with me (meaning, supporting your own thoughts). your reasons for not wanting to argue were stupid, and therefore by being stupid you are becoming what you accused me of being, making you a hypocrite. i can't elaborate more than that
@schmidtbag No, my reasons for not wanting to argue were perfectly reasonable. In YOUR OPINION my reasons for not wanting to argue were 'stupid' and therefore, by your logic I am a hypocrite. However, I am not likely to call myself stupid and so in MY OPINION I am not a hypocrite. My point here is that opinions do no work in a situation like this. If I had said something that made me 'scientifically and provably stupid' then ok.
ati's 5970 don't have PhysX, wich is unfortunate. What's totally messed is that it was able to combine nvidia and ati as to use PhysX . I mean those PhysX kind of ruin my fps in a game that uses em... Need a solution, cos I don't want to miss out on PhysX, and still want to use ATi card.
Here's a solution: buy an Nvidia card. Problem solved. Because you can't do PhysX on your card, and NVIDIA does SLI, but ATI only does Crossfire, so you can't combine them.
Yeah, well, you buy cheap, you get cheap. I realized that after I switched ATI graphics and an AMD processor with an Intel processor and NVIDIA graphics.
@AETutorials42 to be honest when i switched from nvidia to ati i wasnt sure what to expect , I got the card because it outperformaed my nvidia one i bough at the same price by many times , the only reason i can regret buying one is the fact that they have no physX but then theres not many games that utilise it , even nowadays , last one i played was Unreal Tournament 3 (the PhysX map pack)
@keshaz12 LOL, even if that bullshit of what you speak was true, the GPU in a PS3 would be too old to properly utilise PhysX. Do yourself a favour and buy a decent computer rather than slobbering over that low tech, blu ray playing black hunk of japanese rubbish.
i don't own a ps3 and never plan to, but the cpu in ps3 is probably better than what you have, even if you have one of the lower-end quad core i7s, and it probably costs less. sure ps3's graphics aren't really that spectacular but its cpu is fairly cheap yet incredibly powerful, which is why people buy ps3 in bulk to make affordable supercomputers
@schmidtbag Firstly, well done, you managed to repeat what I said. Secondly, I never said the GPU was bad in the first place, I said it would be too old to properly utilise PhysX. And thirdly, 'learn to think'? Haha, really, that doesn't make any sense. Maybe if you could correctly construct an argument that had any depth or real meaning then perhaps I would actually need to use any sort of intelligence to argue with you. However since you are so stupid, that is not necessary.
@no1doesitlikeme what? i didn't repeat anything you said. and again, you said it was rubbish, so obviously you think the gpu is bad. and obviously if you can't understand what "learn to think means" then ironically, you just supported the statement.
i'm going to consider the last part of your comment as "i just lost but i'm too proud to admit it". calling someone "stupid" while you don't even support your own opinions is pretty hypocritical btw
@schmidtbag Yes, you repeated the words 'hunk of japanese rubbish'. Well done. And no, that doesn't mean that I think the GPU is rubbish, that means that I think the overall performance of a PS3 is rubbish when you put everything inside one together as a 'team' shall we say. Also, I would like to know which of my own opinions I do not support and why your extreme sense of imagination leads you to believe that I am hypocritical.
@no1doesitlikeme i quoted you... do you not understand the purpose of quoting? i was trying to make a point which you for some reason turned into "lolz you're repeating me, idiot". i have no idea what you were trying to say in your last statement, and if you actually took the time to read and THINK, you'd understand why you're being a hypocrite
@schmidtbag Oh and by the way, just to prove you wrong about something else, my system has a Phenom 2 955 BE quad core processor which at stock runs @ 3.2Ghz each. Taking into account bus speed and system memory, I think it is safe to say that my processor, and indeed my sytem would destroy a PS3.
wow you just proved yourself wrong. yes, ps3 is very limiting on memory but games don't need that much, most memory goes to the OS. i'm an amd fan but your cpu is no match for the cell processor. ps3's cpu is 7 operating cores, each operating at 3.2ghz. 1 core is disabled deliberately for reliability
@schmidtbag And here you are wrong again. The PS3 does not have 7 operating cores in the same way that a computer would have 4 cores. And they do not all run at 3.2GHz. The architecture of the processor used in a PS3 is completely different from that of an AMD or Intel one. A PS3 processor was made by Sony in collaboration with a few other companies (IBM, for example) the way it works is COMPLETELY different. Put something like that in a computer and not much good would come of it.
@no1doesitlikeme that made absolutely no sense or relevance to anything. ps3's processor contains 8 cores (if its logical or physical, i'm not sure), 7 of which are in use and they are all running at 3.2ghz. look it up before you post. the architecture is different but whats your point? just because YOU can't run windows on it, it doesn't mean its no good. people use ps3 deliberately for its great cpu processing power, which can be taken advantage of by installing linux
this effect physX coming soon in Xbox 360 and PS3. and WII. yes the Wii have a physX accelerator. Red steel use PhysX. effect cloth rigid bodies and ragdoll
Lag yeah thats right ... Just robs Power from your GPU .. Programmers need to put more energy into using multi-core cpus .. Then this tech will become redundent
not really, in most computers the bottle necks lie in the CPU, which prevents the GPU from working at it's full potential, now you can let the GPU do some of the work and let the CPU buisy itself with the million of other tasks it does.
@SnaffleJBean Actually, think about it this way: If the water really was to scale, and that building really was as tall as it was in comparison to the window, then the water really would take that long to fall (just a guess)
yea i have a 8800GT, and when I got the driver to use PhysX I thought it was gonna be awesome. I played Mirror's Edge with PhysX enabled and, well, introduced a lot of random lag, but generally it ran well so I would agree its not built for it but it managed alright.
this is really good tho,this fluid like physics can be applied to every aspect in a game. ACTUAL wind( real an atmosphere) skin, objects which would be able to brake apart, completely,blood/water.. basically if you can create a game with every thing made out of an atom like property you have taken a huge jump closer to reality.
the only thing would be left is for the characters to have a mind off there own to a point where there personalities would be able to change due to what happens around them.and that would solve the increase the ai in games.
this thing is amazing,i installed a few demo & it seems one of those demos installed this nvidia thing,i was unaware. and then i went back to play gta4 an i was Amazed at the improvement in graphics,i didnt kno if my eyes got better or what was happening,frame rate increased alot and i was able to put everything on high.and the funny thing is i have a ati chip set with a ati graphics card. they go great together,strange combination.can only imagine how good it would be with complete nividia
one of the guys from the crysis development team sed when better graphics cards come out they are releasing an update that will add these sorts of this + better graphics for the game. theres a game that has the clothe things he used in these videos and they are used very well in it although i cant remember the game name :(
Also forgot to say im using a Geforce 9800 GTX+ OC 1 GB SLI in my new computer, each of them costed me $214 ($230 plus tax) in Best buy. But the GX2 or the new GPU from the 200 series might cost higher. I hope this helped. Alfo for the guy that asked about this testing, usually they come with the Nvidia disk provided with the video cards =)
It dependes since i think this technology is shown since the 8 of nvidia processors were launched, i have a computer with a Geforce 8600 GPU that has this technology, the prices goes from 100-150 up to 500-600 dollars, the prices depends in the country where you live at, here in mexico the price for a 9 series card goes the double or triple, rip off, buy your stuff in the US, cheaper! if you already live in the US, rock on! cheap stuff for you!
Well its supposed to be the same, the only thing that changes is the speed in the frames per second and some other technology that it has, im not a professional but if you woud like to spend good money i would suggest the Geforce 295 or a GX2 but... 2 9800 GTX+ OC are better than 1 Gx2 for the same price, the Gx2 cost around 500 dollars, and like i said i paid 460 for 2 of them, i would invite you to search some videos that compare the GX2 with the GTX+ OC here in youtube.
someone compared a physx card to a gtx 280 and the nurien demo got 10fps with the physx card while with physx on the gtx 280 he got 50-70fps XD physx card sucks... nvidia rox my 8800GT got 30-40fps in the nurien demo
i really think physics in a game is more important than the graphics because if you have the perfect game only focused on graphics it wouldnt have been fun at all
Is that like Frame Rate only the way it sounds with a mouthful of sperm.
Your voice disgusts me and brings shame on Britain. The worst part of your video isn't your accent, it's the fact that you're reading a script rather than commenting. Lame. Give me your lunch money you weed.
Congratulations! You win at needlessly abusive comments. You embody everything that is wrong with the internet. I would suggest you feel proud, but I doubt you have the cognitive capacity to feel anything other than bitterness and jealousy.
what is that game with the allien ?
65465468 2 months ago
the water seems too "gummy" if anyone is following...it just seems like its not reacting like water whould but a more viscous liquid
xkylex2231 3 months ago
for me physx will always be the new clothes in the wind simulator
SHuffleHardDieTryinG 4 months ago
i dont know if this is supposed to be simulating water cause it looks like clumpy jello
PsiloCybinDreamX 4 months ago
would there be a point of buying a card if most games only use 4 cores and you have a 6 core XD
Mrhanzax 5 months ago
@Mrhanzax GPU have from 100 to 1024 cores, depending their price.
SuperRaptorz 5 months ago
THAT ALIEN IS JUST DISTURBING...
EasterGhost 5 months ago
haha why is there just ATI OR Nvidia for you. My system runs with a radeon 5850 for normal graphics and a Geforce 8800gt for physx. Best way to get perfect performance for little money.
Enermatz 6 months ago
well add a lot of models and buildings when you make a game, and then you'll want screw that cloth system :))
theshadow170y 6 months ago
What game is it at 1:50?
Lomabine527 6 months ago
i haz nvidia geforce 470
JasonChang55 6 months ago
ON VEUT VOIR SA DANS É ANCIENS JEUX !!!!
PREY3R 7 months ago
Think of HL2 Episode 3 Using this *_*
Elbarto1277 7 months ago 18
@Elbarto1277 but HL2E3 will probably be using valve's source engine physics. You'd get something similar to nvidia's, just valve's style.
Dnizzle7 2 months ago
What an insightful and refreshing explanation of PhysX. Thank-you.
dreamspacelion 7 months ago
I don't know,stacking crates on top of each other seems a bit hard for 10 year olds playing with Halo3&Reach's Forge =/
bloodtrailkiller 8 months ago
03:33
Balls. They're touching
Sarckz 9 months ago
ATI just get pwned
ErikRicardoLC 9 months ago
Fuaymuayte
beirch 10 months ago
Been three years, developers havent made shit anything close to this.....
Trololololoish 10 months ago
WHAT GAME IS IT?
xXSkyZXxx 11 months ago
@xXSkyZXxx its a demo...
razzp25 8 months ago
"in a year or two physics will be much better than just stacking crates on top of another" its been 3 years and nothing!! i hope physics do become a part in games
Crazykilla626 11 months ago
Unreal Engine 3 !! 5/5
faredust77 11 months ago
it looks like the inside of a vagina
born2bewilddude 1 year ago
where can i download this new physx drivers for my nvidia 8600gt?
bayandsl 1 year ago
"Special type of physics processing" or "completely wrong physics". Stokes/Navier are rolling in their graves!!
All these physics fluid demos are hilariously wrong. Call me back when you can emulate a simple wood block being pulled along a wooden board, hint f=u_sN, f=u_kN. It is pleasant to look at though...
jci10 1 year ago
i like your voice lol.
johnykonta57 1 year ago
FUCK physx because of it i cant play any of my new games cause i cant install it on my computer
ES7upyours 1 year ago
@ES7upyours
erm... yeah you can play any game, physx is an option.
mckseal 1 year ago
@mckseal i figured out i had to go to nvidea options and enable my video card to use physx
ES7upyours 1 year ago
@ES7upyours
you can use physx on an ati card, it just defaults the physics calculations onto the cpu.
The confusion stems from the fact that Nvidia physx is more than one thing, it is a) a physics engine and b) a method of calculating any physics on the GPU.
with an ati card all of this fluid simulation would run, but it would run slowly and on the cpu.
mckseal 1 year ago
i get a warning saying: "unable to find a PhysX card, or physX being used by other application." ive got a GT 240 which supports physX, do i need to download a diffrent driver, i updated my drivers from the website
SingleShotz 1 year ago
i was eating while watching the video...
couldent eat anymore at 1:40 :(
banoonoo5 1 year ago
Fuck this synthetic shit, put even a little little LITTLE part of into the game PLEASE!!!
plandercozeron 1 year ago
aw man, a game where every enemy was made of jelly would be pretty cool with this graphics card
BLCaptainCrazy 1 year ago
this is BS!!! it NEVER looks like this in a GAME!!!
faheemthedream2007 1 year ago
@faheemthedream2007 u need to turn it on and some game doesn't support PhysX
shuffleharddance 1 year ago
this guy keeps talking about applying these types of simulation to games by... using them in graphical effects
games aren't about graphics, they're about interactivity
if you slap in physics then you don't change the game--you only make it look different
the real challenge is to design deep interaction between player and fluid, or between player and cloth, or whatever
no particular kind of hardware is needed to do that
just some talented people coming up with ideas and developing them
Bananadine 1 year ago
@Bananadine dude, the entire point of video cards and physx processing cards is EFFECTS.
Thats it.
And in case you failed a basic logic course in school, interactions between player and fluid, or player and cloth... That is PURELY physics based effects, and yes, you need powerful hardware to run those types of interactions. A nintendo 64 could never render the type of cloth effects seen in any newer game.
Your post manages to fail 3 times in a row just to make a single (incorrect) point.
MastaSquidge 1 year ago
@MastaSquidge if interactions in games were PURELY physics-based effects, then there'd be no games on your N64, condescending guy
player may for instance... delete a cloth, in a building game
that takes zero physics
video cards transmit visual info to a viewer
physics cards simulate physics
"EFFECTS" don't cover all of that
in general, sufficiently powerful hardware is needed to run a simulation, yes
nVidia hardware is not
PhysX hardware is not
just any old computer that's fast enough
Bananadine 1 year ago
@Bananadine No shit genius.
The type of interactions you are speaking of ARE physics based. Thing A impacts thing B, thing B moves.
You never said anything about deleting "a cloth, in a building game". That has nothing to do with phyics, and requires zero calculation other than telling the software to remove it from sight.
Physics, in terms of what you are speaking of ARE JUST EFFECTS. A piece of a cloak brushing over a character's ankles. Effect. Leaves = effect. They dont enhance gameplay.
MastaSquidge 1 year ago
@MastaSquidge you're saying obvious things
say something new
Bananadine 1 year ago
@Bananadine....
Until your GPU can perform the parallel computations fast enough to do this smoothly, then you do not need dedicated hardware.
It is clear you do not understand what you are talking about:
"the real challenge is to design deep interaction between player and fluid, or between player and cloth, or whatever
no particular kind of hardware is needed to do that"
Your CPU cannot perform those calculations on a currently acceptable (not terrible) level. Period. Hardware IS needed.
MastaSquidge 1 year ago
@MastaSquidge if "hardware" in this context weren't needed then nVidia as we know it wouldn't exist, and this video wouldn't exist, and we wouldn't be talking
whether what I actually meant was right or wrong, you're way behind and I've lost interest
Bananadine 1 year ago
@Bananadine I am talking about the hardware needed to run these "simulations". This hardware is also needed when you start talking about complex physical interactions between a player character and fluids, such as water or oil, complex realistic cloth interactions. Realistic bullet deflection. The list goes on and on, but the point is that a CPU IS NOT POWERFUL ENOUGH TO DO THIS ALONE.
You are talking about physical interactions and how they shouldnt need dedicated cards. But they do.
MastaSquidge 1 year ago
@Bananadine Any sort of "deep interaction" between a player and anything requires calculations. Anything which involves any form of contact based movements is physics calculation.
You say that your examples of cloth and fluid require no special hardware, yet until the primary processor is powerful enough to do the required calculation, this hardware is in fact required.
Why? Because those two things are PHYSICS BASED INTERACTION!
MastaSquidge 1 year ago
1:38 Taking tentacle porn to a whole new level. With new fluid semen physics.
VladtheImpaler31 1 year ago 51
@VladtheImpaler31
You sick, bro'?
ROBLOXingHabbo 1 year ago
@ROBLOXingHabbo Yes, however that is beside the point. I was remarking what the new usage for this technology would probably be with the direction of the internet, momentum travels, the momentum of the internet is pointed towards porn. Tentacle hentai to be precise.
VladtheImpaler31 1 year ago
@VladtheImpaler31
Yes, but your comment is not right.
ROBLOXingHabbo 1 year ago
@ROBLOXingHabbo When is a comment on youtube 'right'. That, is the question.
VladtheImpaler31 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@ROBLOXingHabbo When is a comment on Youtube 'right'. That, is the question.
VladtheImpaler31 1 year ago
wander if they would be able to make the water start bubbling why and reacts to temperature. they make sand look very easy to make on this even though they didnt have it. hope they add wind to physics too, not sure if it would be hard or easy to make
ThomasDemko 1 year ago
Comment removed
ThomasDemko 1 year ago
These fluid simulators lack the ability to recognize the aggressiveness of water and render white surf -- which most people miss.
Other than this, its all very impressive.
osakanone 1 year ago
i see lag... -_-
mynameisjamesj 1 year ago
A question: what physics program may be used to create ,for example, that alien creature, with all its movements and stuff??...it looks quiet impressive actually!:)
TheMothsoul 1 year ago
@TheMothsoul you could try use blender, it's free, but it can be very hard
krypet007 1 year ago
Now, moving back to the topic of the PS3 processor and a PC one, or indeed mine, if you still want to make the comparison. A PS3 cell processor only has 1 fully functioning 'main' core, another core, as you stated, is not run for reliability measures and a further 2 are not even used for processing in games AT ALL. The processor in a PS3 is more comparable to an Intel Atom than more sophisticated i7 and Phenom 2 models.
no1doesitlikeme 1 year ago
@no1doesitlikeme the 2 cores that aren't used for the games is for the ps3 OS. its a vector processor with the PPC architecture so its not really similar to anything x86 based. but, since it is still considered a CPU, its processing capabilities are comparable, and its capable of processing more than cheap i7s, or just about any phenom II. like i said, i'm an amd fan. but the whole reason i said anything in the first place is to show ps3 is not rubbish
schmidtbag 1 year ago
@schmidtbag Now as far as this argument goes, I could carry on forever talking about core architecture, out of order processing, all sorts, and you would carry on forever and we would both be very bored people. I could also go the other way and say that I wasn't going to bother arguing anymore, in which case, you would almost definitely tell me that I had 'lost the argument. I really have to go for dinner now. It was nice discussing matters with you, however I wont be replying anymore. Goodbye.
no1doesitlikeme 1 year ago
Yes, I understand the purpose of quoting. But it would seem apparent that the quote you made, didn't have a purpose. You just randomly decided to take a sentence that I said and recite it back to me, without explaining what the point was. And ok, I have read back through this ridiculous argument, had a little think, as you told me, and still have come to no reasonable conclusion as to how I am a hypocrite. Please, elaborate and explain.
no1doesitlikeme 1 year ago
@no1doesitlikeme i quoted you because i was trying to point out how you said sp3 is rubbish when it really isn't. i'm not sure how thats a difficult concept to grasp. i said you were a hypocrite for calling me stupid, when at the time, you decided not to argue with me (meaning, supporting your own thoughts). your reasons for not wanting to argue were stupid, and therefore by being stupid you are becoming what you accused me of being, making you a hypocrite. i can't elaborate more than that
schmidtbag 1 year ago
@schmidtbag No, my reasons for not wanting to argue were perfectly reasonable. In YOUR OPINION my reasons for not wanting to argue were 'stupid' and therefore, by your logic I am a hypocrite. However, I am not likely to call myself stupid and so in MY OPINION I am not a hypocrite. My point here is that opinions do no work in a situation like this. If I had said something that made me 'scientifically and provably stupid' then ok.
no1doesitlikeme 1 year ago
That sloppy, flappy, slug, alien thing almost put me off my chocolate brownie. Almost.
no1doesitlikeme 1 year ago
This guy Read my Mind,Bioshock Should be Remade using PhysX.
And Since PhysX is Advancing (At least i hope so), It Will be more Impressive than Shown here.
wariofan279 1 year ago
What is Physix? is it actually a part of the hardware or is it just a physiks engine like the havok engine is?
untill now I haven't seen any game where physix really is strongly noticable only tech demos
Raffix394 1 year ago
i am beginning to like Nvidia very very much.
fatbubble123 1 year ago
"as he blobs his way around the room" XD
great video. very interesting. cant wait till this is in games.(and i have a computer that isnt so crap)
tom1161 1 year ago
the alein looks like a bullsquid
chaz1031 1 year ago
Just by curiousity, is the 200 series the most powerful card?
TheLeader1197 1 year ago
@TheLeader1197 no, not now, now the most powerful nvidia cards are the 400 series
nealcolman 1 year ago
@nealcolman Does the ATI 5900 series provide some sort of Physics in those Graphics Cards, or is it just the NVidia cards?
LiuKang1080 1 year ago
the blob and cloth = perfect for the pr0n industry XD
cr9527 1 year ago
ya i like your video, and nothing is wrong with your voice dude.......
sa5er1234 1 year ago
why does evryone trying to make us understand how graphic thingyes work all have the same accent,voice?!?
creatorscootfan 1 year ago
where do you find this demo
combly7 1 year ago
when the water turned black, it looked it it was the fault why an oil spill happened O_o
articfigure 1 year ago
about the cloth, did you ever play Nocturne? The vloth in there is very realistic! And the game is pretty old
MrZoider 1 year ago
The first demo takes me 1 second per frame.... It really sucks :P
GeForce 8400M GS
2.2 Ghz Dual-Core Pentium
2 Mb of ram
bobiolik 1 year ago
Im only just starting to toy with PhysX myself.
I have a 250GTX in one PC, an 880GTS in my Phenom
and I have a pair of 7800GTX in my Opteron and just last week I bought an Aegia PhysX card to have a play but so far, its proven useless.
I am probably wrong but both the 8800 and the 250GTX are faster than teh PhysX card anyway, so p[utting it with one of those would be worthless.
The 7800GTX on the other hand could do with PhysX however these are not fast enough for PhysX capable software?
FatRakoon 1 year ago
i have AGEIA physx what is this?
grineti5 1 year ago
If I turn PhysX off should my card put everything into the graphics? I don't think I need my GTS 250 to help my Phenom II 965 with physics, do I?
phgHunter 1 year ago
i have ATi Radeon
arifizwandy 1 year ago
0:45
omg sybiote factory
asherleez 1 year ago
bioshawk hellz yeah
LulzAreGud 1 year ago
Very good video
glitchTF 1 year ago
ati's 5970 don't have PhysX, wich is unfortunate. What's totally messed is that it was able to combine nvidia and ati as to use PhysX . I mean those PhysX kind of ruin my fps in a game that uses em... Need a solution, cos I don't want to miss out on PhysX, and still want to use ATi card.
Stn3dRaid3r 1 year ago 6
@Stn3dRaid3r
Here's a solution: buy an Nvidia card. Problem solved. Because you can't do PhysX on your card, and NVIDIA does SLI, but ATI only does Crossfire, so you can't combine them.
AETutorials42 7 months ago
@AETutorials42 I'm quite satisfied with my ATI, thank you very much.
Stn3dRaid3r 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Stn3dRaid3r
Well, you didn't want to miss out on PhysX, but now you are, so...
AETutorials42 7 months ago
@Stn3dRaid3r Well, then stay without PhysiX
Trualdie 7 months ago
@Trualdie that seems to be the best solution by far... erm, thus far...
Stn3dRaid3r 7 months ago
@AETutorials42 ATI is ALOT cheaper for that reason...
jimbo80982 6 months ago
@jimbo80982
Yeah, well, you buy cheap, you get cheap. I realized that after I switched ATI graphics and an AMD processor with an Intel processor and NVIDIA graphics.
AETutorials42 6 months ago
@AETutorials42 to be honest when i switched from nvidia to ati i wasnt sure what to expect , I got the card because it outperformaed my nvidia one i bough at the same price by many times , the only reason i can regret buying one is the fact that they have no physX but then theres not many games that utilise it , even nowadays , last one i played was Unreal Tournament 3 (the PhysX map pack)
jimbo80982 6 months ago
i want to swim in that water
TheLedGuitarist 1 year ago
Acctualy the physx comes only to the PS3 cuz it has an nvidia graphics card while XBOX360 and WII have an ati one.
so nvidia wont let the XBOX360 and WII developers to use physx.
while ps3 will have this with fun.
keshaz12 2 years ago
no it wont!dumbass you dont know jack shit..it has an nvidia card but it doesnt support physx...fucking fanboy
slashpawns 2 years ago
Just a shame that Physx is an nvidia gimmick. Physics engines are shifting over to havok which is much much better.
manhunt48 1 year ago
the PS3 has a 7800 GPU, physX is only supported on 8XXX series GPUs and up.
only the PC gaming master race can appreciate this mate ;)
666necrobutcher666 1 year ago
@keshaz12 LOL, even if that bullshit of what you speak was true, the GPU in a PS3 would be too old to properly utilise PhysX. Do yourself a favour and buy a decent computer rather than slobbering over that low tech, blu ray playing black hunk of japanese rubbish.
no1doesitlikeme 1 year ago
@no1doesitlikeme
i don't own a ps3 and never plan to, but the cpu in ps3 is probably better than what you have, even if you have one of the lower-end quad core i7s, and it probably costs less. sure ps3's graphics aren't really that spectacular but its cpu is fairly cheap yet incredibly powerful, which is why people buy ps3 in bulk to make affordable supercomputers
schmidtbag 1 year ago
@schmidtbag That maybe true about the CPU but I never said anything about that. I said GPU. Learn to read, idiot.
no1doesitlikeme 1 year ago
@no1doesitlikeme
...you were saying ps3 is a "hunk of japanese rubbish". the gpu on it isn't THAT bad, and my point was for its capabilities, ps3 is pretty good.
learn to think, idiot
schmidtbag 1 year ago
@schmidtbag Firstly, well done, you managed to repeat what I said. Secondly, I never said the GPU was bad in the first place, I said it would be too old to properly utilise PhysX. And thirdly, 'learn to think'? Haha, really, that doesn't make any sense. Maybe if you could correctly construct an argument that had any depth or real meaning then perhaps I would actually need to use any sort of intelligence to argue with you. However since you are so stupid, that is not necessary.
no1doesitlikeme 1 year ago
@no1doesitlikeme what? i didn't repeat anything you said. and again, you said it was rubbish, so obviously you think the gpu is bad. and obviously if you can't understand what "learn to think means" then ironically, you just supported the statement.
i'm going to consider the last part of your comment as "i just lost but i'm too proud to admit it". calling someone "stupid" while you don't even support your own opinions is pretty hypocritical btw
schmidtbag 1 year ago
@schmidtbag Yes, you repeated the words 'hunk of japanese rubbish'. Well done. And no, that doesn't mean that I think the GPU is rubbish, that means that I think the overall performance of a PS3 is rubbish when you put everything inside one together as a 'team' shall we say. Also, I would like to know which of my own opinions I do not support and why your extreme sense of imagination leads you to believe that I am hypocritical.
no1doesitlikeme 1 year ago
@no1doesitlikeme i quoted you... do you not understand the purpose of quoting? i was trying to make a point which you for some reason turned into "lolz you're repeating me, idiot". i have no idea what you were trying to say in your last statement, and if you actually took the time to read and THINK, you'd understand why you're being a hypocrite
schmidtbag 1 year ago
@schmidtbag Oh and by the way, just to prove you wrong about something else, my system has a Phenom 2 955 BE quad core processor which at stock runs @ 3.2Ghz each. Taking into account bus speed and system memory, I think it is safe to say that my processor, and indeed my sytem would destroy a PS3.
no1doesitlikeme 1 year ago
@no1doesitlikeme
wow you just proved yourself wrong. yes, ps3 is very limiting on memory but games don't need that much, most memory goes to the OS. i'm an amd fan but your cpu is no match for the cell processor. ps3's cpu is 7 operating cores, each operating at 3.2ghz. 1 core is disabled deliberately for reliability
schmidtbag 1 year ago
@schmidtbag And here you are wrong again. The PS3 does not have 7 operating cores in the same way that a computer would have 4 cores. And they do not all run at 3.2GHz. The architecture of the processor used in a PS3 is completely different from that of an AMD or Intel one. A PS3 processor was made by Sony in collaboration with a few other companies (IBM, for example) the way it works is COMPLETELY different. Put something like that in a computer and not much good would come of it.
no1doesitlikeme 1 year ago
@no1doesitlikeme that made absolutely no sense or relevance to anything. ps3's processor contains 8 cores (if its logical or physical, i'm not sure), 7 of which are in use and they are all running at 3.2ghz. look it up before you post. the architecture is different but whats your point? just because YOU can't run windows on it, it doesn't mean its no good. people use ps3 deliberately for its great cpu processing power, which can be taken advantage of by installing linux
schmidtbag 1 year ago
this effect physX coming soon in Xbox 360 and PS3. and WII. yes the Wii have a physX accelerator. Red steel use PhysX. effect cloth rigid bodies and ragdoll
Jigsaw5999999999 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Should i Uninstall my physx?
YoungMaanawadu 2 years ago
should i install my PhysX?
YoungMaanawadu 2 years ago
Lag yeah thats right ... Just robs Power from your GPU .. Programmers need to put more energy into using multi-core cpus .. Then this tech will become redundent
jamezxh 2 years ago
I got a quad core and it's a fuckin beast. Multi-Cores are the best thing since sliced bread.
picassopainter2 2 years ago 2
not really, in most computers the bottle necks lie in the CPU, which prevents the GPU from working at it's full potential, now you can let the GPU do some of the work and let the CPU buisy itself with the million of other tasks it does.
NickBlackDIN 2 years ago
finally something other then anti-aliasing that will give my gtx 275 a little exersise
chevezez 2 years ago
i can't wait... physics own!!!!!!!!!!!
BatmanASB 2 years ago
looks slow and crappy to me... total lag out and if thats on demos well errrm cough cough.
truthseekers666 2 years ago
You know, it could be slowed down on purpose to show the physics.
SnaffleJBean 2 years ago 13
@SnaffleJBean son solo efectos que llevan a los juegos a un nuevo nivel de realismo a un efecto y reaccion en los objetos etc
sumbainoruben 1 year ago
@SnaffleJBean Actually, think about it this way: If the water really was to scale, and that building really was as tall as it was in comparison to the window, then the water really would take that long to fall (just a guess)
Neptutron 1 year ago
u need a very good pc to run this. i have 26-30 fps in the demo.
Niklasdiver123 2 years ago
Or just a semi decent Nvidia card? :P
CutOutSock 2 years ago
we talking about 3d renderman prog_ or maxion 3d and if so what's the cost of this video phys
protest911 2 years ago
yea i have a 8800GT, and when I got the driver to use PhysX I thought it was gonna be awesome. I played Mirror's Edge with PhysX enabled and, well, introduced a lot of random lag, but generally it ran well so I would agree its not built for it but it managed alright.
chidster64 2 years ago
well there is a game out with the physx fluid water thing. its the survivalhorrorgame "cryotasis". the physics look epic!
Niklasdiver123 2 years ago
this is really good tho,this fluid like physics can be applied to every aspect in a game. ACTUAL wind( real an atmosphere) skin, objects which would be able to brake apart, completely,blood/water.. basically if you can create a game with every thing made out of an atom like property you have taken a huge jump closer to reality.
ziggyYardie 2 years ago
the only thing would be left is for the characters to have a mind off there own to a point where there personalities would be able to change due to what happens around them.and that would solve the increase the ai in games.
ziggyYardie 2 years ago
this thing is amazing,i installed a few demo & it seems one of those demos installed this nvidia thing,i was unaware. and then i went back to play gta4 an i was Amazed at the improvement in graphics,i didnt kno if my eyes got better or what was happening,frame rate increased alot and i was able to put everything on high.and the funny thing is i have a ati chip set with a ati graphics card. they go great together,strange combination.can only imagine how good it would be with complete nividia
ziggyYardie 2 years ago 2
physx :)
chevezez 2 years ago
Can someone tell me the name of that demo?
Typhoon07 2 years ago
5 people bough physx card hahaha xD yeah right mate... :D never would do that
M3G4G0TH 2 years ago
intense
zig3 2 years ago
this is perfect
MedPotter 2 years ago
I got a Nvidia Geforce GT 120 and just wondering if this supports for my grafic carad ...Nvidia gT 120 is same as 9500 gt I think..
TheShadow91 2 years ago
souns like my physics teacher xD
Nattacus 2 years ago 2
metal clothe would be perfect in all online FPSs
rockcabbage 2 years ago
Could somebody please tell me the name of the game with the alien in?
leorules666 2 years ago
It's not an actual game, it's just a tech demo from Nvidia. Walking around while tazing and looking at this creature is all you can do...
666BlackSpear 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
its just a test
gleneth00 2 years ago
yes
Volth1 2 years ago
Comment removed
wawa779 2 years ago
yes
Qwuake 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
this guy has a silly speech impediment
TheBestGuitarSoloEVR 2 years ago
Its an accent you fool.
misterpers0n 2 years ago 8
lol
Mudkiips 2 years ago
RED FACTION DUDE!!! It Ownes..
RinoXX 2 years ago
lmao as if cloth physics are more impressive than that soft alien skin?
Amazing physics. Even Crysis, nor Dead Space has this stuff
SeriousIlya 2 years ago
He's probably trolling us about his fascinating about the cloth.
esykillll 2 years ago
one of the guys from the crysis development team sed when better graphics cards come out they are releasing an update that will add these sorts of this + better graphics for the game. theres a game that has the clothe things he used in these videos and they are used very well in it although i cant remember the game name :(
boen747 2 years ago
Also forgot to say im using a Geforce 9800 GTX+ OC 1 GB SLI in my new computer, each of them costed me $214 ($230 plus tax) in Best buy. But the GX2 or the new GPU from the 200 series might cost higher. I hope this helped. Alfo for the guy that asked about this testing, usually they come with the Nvidia disk provided with the video cards =)
Rodrigoenlu 2 years ago
It dependes since i think this technology is shown since the 8 of nvidia processors were launched, i have a computer with a Geforce 8600 GPU that has this technology, the prices goes from 100-150 up to 500-600 dollars, the prices depends in the country where you live at, here in mexico the price for a 9 series card goes the double or triple, rip off, buy your stuff in the US, cheaper! if you already live in the US, rock on! cheap stuff for you!
Rodrigoenlu 2 years ago
I live in Britain so everything is a rip-off here too!
does the 9 series have better physics simulators than the 8 series or they the same?
chickenruler 2 years ago
Well its supposed to be the same, the only thing that changes is the speed in the frames per second and some other technology that it has, im not a professional but if you woud like to spend good money i would suggest the Geforce 295 or a GX2 but... 2 9800 GTX+ OC are better than 1 Gx2 for the same price, the Gx2 cost around 500 dollars, and like i said i paid 460 for 2 of them, i would invite you to search some videos that compare the GX2 with the GTX+ OC here in youtube.
Rodrigoenlu 2 years ago
So what sort of graphics acard do I need to do that sort of thing? and how much is it......
chickenruler 2 years ago
I posted a comment that will asnwer your question about this video =)
Rodrigoenlu 2 years ago
PERFECT
MedPotter 2 years ago
where do you get that testing ?
vetle12 2 years ago
very nice
ToniMontana47 2 years ago
suggo!!!!
karideka7 2 years ago
someone compared a physx card to a gtx 280 and the nurien demo got 10fps with the physx card while with physx on the gtx 280 he got 50-70fps XD physx card sucks... nvidia rox my 8800GT got 30-40fps in the nurien demo
TheOnlyDuST 2 years ago
doink!
dariusfol 2 years ago
great video, very interesting
mrsepek 2 years ago
well im running a 256 8600 m and my framerate on this simulation sucks balls.
oh well. it IS a laptop after all
BergerKing064 2 years ago
You could have an old card (like i do) such as an 8800gt or a 7900gs
if you get a better card you can dedicate that as a physx card
So its not just the people who brought the physx cards who can have better framerates =D
and an 8800gt is nice and cheap so if you do get a 200 series card or a 9800gtx+ (my card) then an extra 40-50 quid on the side will be noticable
tinymouse2 2 years ago
i really think physics in a game is more important than the graphics because if you have the perfect game only focused on graphics it wouldnt have been fun at all
jrompe 2 years ago
wat game was that where that whered thing fell out of that weird electrical cage thing or did u just make it to show the physx
dragonblade12789 2 years ago
OMG who let Sally Struthers out of her cage?
Xtro2005 2 years ago
Whow...amazing :O
zaubertom 3 years ago 2
This has been flagged as spam show
You sound like the gayest man on the internet.
You pronounce R's very slightly like V's / Ws.
Frwvame Wvate what the hell is that?
Is that like Frame Rate only the way it sounds with a mouthful of sperm.
Your voice disgusts me and brings shame on Britain. The worst part of your video isn't your accent, it's the fact that you're reading a script rather than commenting. Lame. Give me your lunch money you weed.
srjones8 3 years ago
Congratulations! You win at needlessly abusive comments. You embody everything that is wrong with the internet. I would suggest you feel proud, but I doubt you have the cognitive capacity to feel anything other than bitterness and jealousy.
xcession 3 years ago 3
If my voice is a bit weird in this video It's more likely that I had a cold, or was experiencing major hayfever at the time.
I find it interesting that you jumped to the 'mouthful of sperm' explanation before considering the 'slightly blocked nose' option.
I'm not sure what a mouthful of sperm sounds like. Perhaps you could let me know?
PotentialGamer 3 years ago 11
@PotentialGamer hahahahahaha