Pollini plays Chopin like some super-intelligent alien from another planet (Italy??) who has amazing technique but doesn't understand humanity and its flaws.
Chopin's music is not about perfection. It's about imperfection and beauty.
@ghostwriter11 dude. what are you talking about. Do you know Pollini that well to talk those crap about him? He doesn't understand humanity and its flaws? do you know then? I can see why you mention humanity, but what does it's flaws have to do with pollini playing chopin?
@ChukCharcoales Valentina does not have a "much clearer right hand." Pollini's right hand in this piece is probably the most even out of all of the pianists I've heard.
Wow, Wow, WOW!!! You played it very clear on the notes!!! I like the dynamic contrast as well. Keep playing this everyday and you can even get better!!! There is no end towards Chopin music ;)
I love this piece for so many reasons, my brother practiced it so much back in the day, and it has since become a part of me. Out of all the runs, my favorites are at the following times:
@jwunschie14 i completely agree, but you left out 1:35 , i dont prefer the way pollini plays this section, not that its wrong, just not my preference. to me this section is mysterious, i think it should be played lightly w/ an accent on the first beat of the descending arpeggios. 1:40 to me should be played a bit more agressively, in contrast to my first statement. but Pollini technique still inspires me
@anonymousQ45 Agreed, i enjoy both the runs you listed, more than most. I agree also with the aggressiveness at 1:40. As for overall favorite, I still prefer 0:20....I don't know why, but I am obsessed with this run! Is it your favorite or do you prefer the 2 you listed?
@felixholek In conversation with David Dubal, Horowitz claimed that he could not play this etude, nor could he play op. 10. no. 2 or the Winter Wind Etude. It seems incredible, but that's what Dubal reported in his book, "Evenings with Horowitz".
this HAS been posted before however youtube deleted it along with 4000 other videos on franzferencelizst's channel for copyright infringment (his whole channel was deleted so it may have not been THIS recording).
Trust me, I have been playing this etude since forever and this is the best interpretation. I won't write a whole essay about the way Pollini plays this. The pedalling is perfect, the line in the bass is a haunting bell-sounding feature to it. The timing is perfect - not too fast but perfectly even. Pollini plays the difficult arpeggios cleanly and precise. A monumental and legendary performance.
Jeez Im having more fun studying Chopin Etudes than Hanon excercises. Hanon excercises would be more fun if they were more musical. Thank god Chopin lol
Yes, the balance between the top and bottom ends of the piano is excellent. Obviously, a very high quality ? Steinway? Sounds too bright for a Bosendorfer, so it must be a Steinway. As for owning all of the etudes? Don't know if I would agree there...but this one is between him and Garrick Ohllson.
I could tell you which measure he messed up in, but, I like his playing so much that I'm not going to tell you. His continuity was so excellent that most people would not notice the two arpeggios he misses in one measure.
Chopin was called the right-handed genius; like I was trying to see how much left hand action you get here, but I can't see a damn freaking thing, obviously...
MAURIZIO: FUISTE EL PRIMER PIANISTA QUE ESCUCHE EN MI VIDA (6 AÑOS) TE AGRADEZCO INFINITAMENTE POR MOTIVARME A SER PIANISTA Y A CADA DIA ADMIRARTE MAS... DESDE ECUADOR (SUDAMERICA) TE ENVIO MI FRATERNO SALUDO Y ADMIRACIÓN Paúl Carrión
absolute best ever rendition. I have heard pretty much every major version of this etude and have played it for years. Pollini's version is unparalleled. The clean arpeggios, the melody in the bass, the technique, etc...
Other decent performances - gavrilov, richter, beresovsky, perahia, lugansky
this is sublime. sweeping, majestic, towering... pollini really does justice to this etude. makes it sound effortless, when anyone who has attempted to play it knows it is anything but. my right wrist aches just thinking about it....
This shit is epic, but I'm gonna try to play it with crescendos. I think it might sound FUCKING epic if it soudns super soft int he beginning and then rises up to hard sounds, and back to soft and etc. COuld you imagine that shit? AHHHH I'm gonna go practice...I FEEL LIKE GOD!!! LMAO
actually this piece wasn't played as fast as possible when written. search for 'chopin op 10/1 too fast to play?' and you'll understand this piece a bit more :)
@psychopathtoine Agree...I mean all of the performances I have listened to on Youtube are great, and everyone will have their favorites. For me, I like Cortot the best of those I've listened to around here mostly bc I can't get my mind around the concept of playing anything by Chopin in the mode of a show piece. I also agree with Andre in that I love Ashkenazy's version as well, the degree of colour he fits in such a small space is truly poetic.
Excellent technique... Perhaps the best technicque on this piece among all major interpreters... Never the less I still prefer Ashkenazy version, no one reaches a wider range of sounds like ashkenazy do...
I've heard countless interpretations of this piece and this certainly made me sit up an take notice. This piece is so notoriously difficult to take it beyond a harmonic progression of arpeggios and give it true musicality. The pianist in this recording has managed, imho, to create a shimmering harp-like texture that it stands quite rightly as a fully-formed piece of music. I, for one, am impressed.
I agree that some of Pollini´s interpretations are cold, others may be too fast, etc., in this etude, however, it can´t get any better. I like this etude being played vigorously rather than poetically
Oh now I understand because you don't like Pollini. You prefer Argerich!? Argerich is not a pianist in a clown who thinks that she is the genius of the piano... She is one of the worse pianist.. Pollini one of the best pianist not only today but all the times like the true Pianist: Backhaus, Horowitz, Gilels, Glenn Gould, Cortoto, Fischer, Demus...
WOW! This is Amazing. any know what brand piano this is because its the most beautiful piano i've ever heard or is it editing that made it sound like the voice of god. And this is a splendid interpretation
Why are we so worried about whether it was played at once or in stages? It's a recording, not a Guinness Book feat. Impressive if he nailed it in one sitting, but I also appreciate music that was honed with the help of editing, to deliver the most rewarding listening experience.
@druidmechanics Agree - It is normal that all records become stage by stage. If he wished to play for one approach it would be not easier to organise simply concert and to write down from it etudes?) For me - this interpritation of this piece absolutle fantastic! And i don't worry about the way ofrecording.
Basically, every studio recording has countless edits in it. I'm not sure if they're every measure (since it's such a short and concentrated piece). However, I would not be surprised if Pollini could absolutely nail this piece live. =)
This is the best interpretation of this Etude.. The Etudes are pieces of technique and showmanship. Pollini's interpretation creates magic. He puts his own emotion in it without disrupting the beauty of the song. It's crisp, fresh, and beautiful.
I'd have to agree with ruimanak. I never realized this before now I'd have to say some people put too much emotion into pieces that don't require it. For instance how do you put emotion into a song like that entertainer it's supposed to be a rigid march. I believe that this song was intended without much emotion. So I have to say that I believe this is the best interpretation of the song.
Pollini has in my view created novelty in how he plays Chopin. In fact, I consider it as an innovative comprehension of Chopin and his music that searches its equal in the whole of musical performance history. This is so much the more true for how he played the Etudes. He gave his Chopin a quality of authenticity and, should I say, objectiveness, that I haven't heard with any other pianist. For the op. 10/1 Etude, I also consider the renderings by Richter and Gavrilov very to the point.
I meant his interpretation of Chopin's "études". And even Chopin said what i said about excessive emotions and how they "tore the musical structure" originally intended.
I disagree on Ashkenzy. Pollini has very clear right hand notes and a much better compliment in the bass. I wish some of them would pay more attention to the bass like it was a melody. It can make the piece so much more beautiful, when the right accents are used. Half of them do a hammer job on the left hand, and have no building process in it. Argerich played it fast but I didn't like her left hand. Cziffra hammered the left hand and almost missed some right hand notes. Lisitsa good but slower.
Very good... Perfect I'd say... Nevertheless I prefer Ashkenazy version of this etude: he puts much more feeling in his interpretation, anyway showing a perfect technique.
I agree. Although Pollini has some of the best, crispest, recordings of the etudes, Ashkenazy's version is better, due to the feeling he puts into it (like you said). Still, this is a five-star!
I listened to Argerich's recording, and it's pretty good, but I think it's on the borderline of becoming too unsteady. I prefer Pollini and Ashkenazy's because they are more stable. I also liked Ashkenazy's because he did this cool thing with leaving out the pedal on some of the arpeggios. Oh well...
I want to apologize as I am with stupor of the bottle. But, I have played the piano for quite some time. I would like to interject those whose dream it is to play into the very self. That, though, such people as Chopin are obviously geniuses, they have ultimately, created a shadow of their potential in the social world. Listen. Those of you with such great love for your instrument, remember never to forget the beauty of humanity. And the power of your creation shared with the world.
I sucked this guy's cock once on the road. jeez that was way more arduous that playing this bit of pianistic fluff. he was huge, i could barely breathe and he came in my throat, the bastard.
This is a better song, but Godowsky just amazed me with the way he took something hard and made it into pure headache-inducing difficulty. They are better than each other in two diff ways.
Vivat Polonia!!!
KarolLewandowsky 1 year ago
i really think Pollini is the best interpreter of Chopin's etudes.
iWillBlockYou 1 year ago
he's the best on chopin, i think.
nimesse 1 year ago
damn, for this etude, he is better than cziffra or richter
TripleRhu 1 year ago 2
PERFECTION IS SO LITTLE TO CALL THIS MAN
mostruki 1 year ago
It sounds like the glorious sun scorching the earth!
TheSilentSon 1 year ago
I so agree- with just a brief look around- the search stops here...at perfection!
jkbidwell 1 year ago
Perfect. In fact, it's way too perfect.
Pollini plays Chopin like some super-intelligent alien from another planet (Italy??) who has amazing technique but doesn't understand humanity and its flaws.
Chopin's music is not about perfection. It's about imperfection and beauty.
ghostwriter11 1 year ago
@ghostwriter11 dude. what are you talking about. Do you know Pollini that well to talk those crap about him? He doesn't understand humanity and its flaws? do you know then? I can see why you mention humanity, but what does it's flaws have to do with pollini playing chopin?
jumpyrice 1 year ago
Valentina's interpretation is slower, has longer pauses, and has a much clearer right hand. I prefer her interpretation.
ChukCharcoales 1 year ago
@ChukCharcoales Valentina does not have a "much clearer right hand." Pollini's right hand in this piece is probably the most even out of all of the pianists I've heard.
bobbphysics 1 year ago
@ChukCharcoales i wont state anything as it´s your opinion but.... hell it´s soo wrong
ok lisitsa is good but too a superficial pianist as an interpreter :p
alejandrothefader 1 year ago
grande maestro ...
marchinoful 1 year ago
This piano is a Hamburg Steinway D modified by the Italian piano technician Angelo Fabbrini.
emorydude2 1 year ago
@emorydude2 are you any kind of online piano guide??
:P
i want that piano...
alejandrothefader 1 year ago
That piano has been tuned.
z978ady 1 year ago
0:51-1:04 = eargasm
LtAld0Raine 1 year ago
@LtAld0Raine yes! my favorite to play and listen to!
anonymousQ45 1 year ago
He will come to Japan soon.
yukie3yo 1 year ago
Wow, Wow, WOW!!! You played it very clear on the notes!!! I like the dynamic contrast as well. Keep playing this everyday and you can even get better!!! There is no end towards Chopin music ;)
AlexPianoPwns 1 year ago
I love this piece for so many reasons, my brother practiced it so much back in the day, and it has since become a part of me. Out of all the runs, my favorites are at the following times:
3rd. 0:15 - :017
2nd. 0:55 - 0:56
1st. 0:20 - 0:23
I encourage you to share your own! And I ensure you I LOVE then entire piece, and what a great performance!
jwunschie14 1 year ago 2
@jwunschie14 i completely agree, but you left out 1:35 , i dont prefer the way pollini plays this section, not that its wrong, just not my preference. to me this section is mysterious, i think it should be played lightly w/ an accent on the first beat of the descending arpeggios. 1:40 to me should be played a bit more agressively, in contrast to my first statement. but Pollini technique still inspires me
anonymousQ45 1 year ago
@anonymousQ45 Agreed, i enjoy both the runs you listed, more than most. I agree also with the aggressiveness at 1:40. As for overall favorite, I still prefer 0:20....I don't know why, but I am obsessed with this run! Is it your favorite or do you prefer the 2 you listed?
jwunschie14 1 year ago
@jwunschie14 all 3
anonymousQ45 1 year ago
wonderful....he seems to sing...(does anyone know a intpretation of this etuse by horowitz??)
felixholek 1 year ago
@felixholek Nope.. sorry friend :(
GIULIOPT95 1 year ago
@felixholek In conversation with David Dubal, Horowitz claimed that he could not play this etude, nor could he play op. 10. no. 2 or the Winter Wind Etude. It seems incredible, but that's what Dubal reported in his book, "Evenings with Horowitz".
karlakor 1 year ago
this HAS been posted before however youtube deleted it along with 4000 other videos on franzferencelizst's channel for copyright infringment (his whole channel was deleted so it may have not been THIS recording).
deadly990 1 year ago
Bravo!!!!!
Mieta79 1 year ago
Outstanding performance ! Powerful , precise, visceral .Bravo!!!
Ana2010Claudia 1 year ago
Outstanding performance !Bravo!!!
Ana2010Claudia 1 year ago
@KV467 and @Mustloveoranda
The tragedy is that you're both right.
ulviliegi 1 year ago
Wow thats the perfect way you can write something in c major, chopin rocks
raulisable 1 year ago
Trust me, I have been playing this etude since forever and this is the best interpretation. I won't write a whole essay about the way Pollini plays this. The pedalling is perfect, the line in the bass is a haunting bell-sounding feature to it. The timing is perfect - not too fast but perfectly even. Pollini plays the difficult arpeggios cleanly and precise. A monumental and legendary performance.
gbshalev 1 year ago 30
@gbshalev listen to Louis Lortie too
anonymousQ45 1 year ago
@gbshalev
check out ashkenazys. I think is has a lot more soul than this one.
But this is a tight ass version as well.
Oerti2 1 year ago
the best pollini
andriventu 1 year ago
Pure magic! \o/ :D
Fox7117 1 year ago
not fair :( my piano sounds nowhere near as good as this!!it makes me sound crappier than i am!!
jordankuprij 1 year ago
what can I say for this, just simply the best..
YeolWOe 1 year ago
He is the Chopinist!!
heyagakurai 1 year ago 10
better than ashkenazy's version.
MrTaleylon 1 year ago
@MrTaleylon definitely agree
findelka1810 1 year ago
amazing???? not a single note of music, just like his face: fake emotion...
mombeekmarcel 1 year ago
@mombeekmarcel
Enough of your silly playing and your imbecile comment.
Boeuf65 1 year ago
Comment removed
MrJYTK 1 year ago
Still think this would be great with a Bechstein
MrMonstaGamer 1 year ago
Jeez Im having more fun studying Chopin Etudes than Hanon excercises. Hanon excercises would be more fun if they were more musical. Thank god Chopin lol
Heero545 1 year ago 2
gona learn this song in 10 years a will have it perfect!!
311Bambino 1 year ago
Yes, the balance between the top and bottom ends of the piano is excellent. Obviously, a very high quality ? Steinway? Sounds too bright for a Bosendorfer, so it must be a Steinway. As for owning all of the etudes? Don't know if I would agree there...but this one is between him and Garrick Ohllson.
robertslistening 1 year ago
god this song is so pretty. sublime. it sounds very modernische... a bit like grieg
markov2b1 1 year ago
Check out my tutorial on this piece on my channel!!
scottg4life 1 year ago
Another great under- rated interpretor is Vladimir Ashkenazy :D
emi1534 1 year ago 5
I could tell you which measure he messed up in, but, I like his playing so much that I'm not going to tell you. His continuity was so excellent that most people would not notice the two arpeggios he misses in one measure.
robertslistening 1 year ago
@robertslistening lol
Lity10 1 year ago
@robertslistening Woytowicz misses no arpeggios. And he uses no pedal.
classicvinylbiz 1 year ago
Congratulations.
nycolas1712 1 year ago
Thank God I'm Right- Handed!
MusicClassical1 1 year ago
@MusicClassical1 I know right? Thank god this ain't like "Revolutionary"!
Heero545 1 year ago
This is probably my favourite version of this study.
Brilliant playing by Pollini.
Troybeallad 1 year ago
Chopin was called the right-handed genius; like I was trying to see how much left hand action you get here, but I can't see a damn freaking thing, obviously...
fredericfranc 1 year ago
MAURIZIO: FUISTE EL PRIMER PIANISTA QUE ESCUCHE EN MI VIDA (6 AÑOS) TE AGRADEZCO INFINITAMENTE POR MOTIVARME A SER PIANISTA Y A CADA DIA ADMIRARTE MAS... DESDE ECUADOR (SUDAMERICA) TE ENVIO MI FRATERNO SALUDO Y ADMIRACIÓN Paúl Carrión
bedaccorocco 1 year ago
@bedaccorocco
bedaccorocco 1 year ago
absolute best ever rendition. I have heard pretty much every major version of this etude and have played it for years. Pollini's version is unparalleled. The clean arpeggios, the melody in the bass, the technique, etc...
Other decent performances - gavrilov, richter, beresovsky, perahia, lugansky
gbshalev 1 year ago
@gbshalev vladimir ashkenazy, my friend!! and backhaus, argerich??ashkenazy is the best at playing this...amazing dynamics...
satyu131089 1 year ago
this music makes me think of sick chopin walking through flowering fields when spring comes... but not for him!
AristYdes 1 year ago 2
very clear notes. very smooth.. amazing
MrImperfection 1 year ago
this is sublime. sweeping, majestic, towering... pollini really does justice to this etude. makes it sound effortless, when anyone who has attempted to play it knows it is anything but. my right wrist aches just thinking about it....
anyway, bravissimo!
semicolin 1 year ago 2
This shit is epic, but I'm gonna try to play it with crescendos. I think it might sound FUCKING epic if it soudns super soft int he beginning and then rises up to hard sounds, and back to soft and etc. COuld you imagine that shit? AHHHH I'm gonna go practice...I FEEL LIKE GOD!!! LMAO
FearRain 1 year ago
perfection,,,,words are useless here,,,,,,,,,,,
aston0708 1 year ago
素晴らしい!
お見事です。
rakuhiro5 1 year ago
For me Richter is the greatest at this etude
MrReinhardtd 1 year ago
actually this piece wasn't played as fast as possible when written. search for 'chopin op 10/1 too fast to play?' and you'll understand this piece a bit more :)
psychopathtoine 1 year ago
@psychopathtoine Agree...I mean all of the performances I have listened to on Youtube are great, and everyone will have their favorites. For me, I like Cortot the best of those I've listened to around here mostly bc I can't get my mind around the concept of playing anything by Chopin in the mode of a show piece. I also agree with Andre in that I love Ashkenazy's version as well, the degree of colour he fits in such a small space is truly poetic.
Cancrizans 1 year ago
Excellent technique... Perhaps the best technicque on this piece among all major interpreters... Never the less I still prefer Ashkenazy version, no one reaches a wider range of sounds like ashkenazy do...
AndreAx1985 1 year ago 2
This has been flagged as spam show
I've heard countless interpretations of this piece and this certainly made me sit up an take notice. This piece is so notoriously difficult to take it beyond a harmonic progression of arpeggios and give it true musicality. The pianist in this recording has managed, imho, to create a shimmering harp-like texture that it stands quite rightly as a fully-formed piece of music. I, for one, am impressed.
ThoughtGazeCarlos 1 year ago
He's really good. I had a go at recording this one too (click my name).
SteinwayArtist 1 year ago
why do ppl keep ripping off Chopin's stuff for & then selling only half of it lol... .. ? ..
Peace:) UB
mrundercoverdude 1 year ago
lol i mean whole lol
mrundercoverdude 1 year ago
thats not the hole tune...
mrundercoverdude 1 year ago
oh man this is amazing.. how the hell did i miss this small bit of music heaven?... chopin is bloody amazing!! lol
mrundercoverdude 1 year ago
...SECONDO ..MA PER DIRE..
SCIOCCHEZZE::
grazie.......
sono orgoglioso di essere italiano..
leonboelmann 1 year ago
Pollini plays each note with such clarity, they sound translucent.
Cedarosaurus 1 year ago 2
He plays it like a monumental prelude... Which, in a way, it is.
OLarney87 1 year ago 3
bravo!
axc19891 1 year ago
LOVE LOVE LOVE LOVE THIS!!!!
lalagirl259 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I agree that some of Pollini´s interpretations are cold, others may be too fast, etc., in this etude, however, it can´t get any better. I like this etude being played vigorously rather than poetically
Pianist227 1 year ago
Comment removed
Pianist227 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Sometimes I like Pollini's playing, but this is a boring interpretation of the op10 n1.
So flat, always the same volume...always played forte...where are the dynamics?
gta661610 1 year ago
Volume leveling software
D0g63rt 1 year ago
In his head
gta661610 1 year ago
Oh now I understand because you don't like Pollini. You prefer Argerich!? Argerich is not a pianist in a clown who thinks that she is the genius of the piano... She is one of the worse pianist.. Pollini one of the best pianist not only today but all the times like the true Pianist: Backhaus, Horowitz, Gilels, Glenn Gould, Cortoto, Fischer, Demus...
WaldemarKoszlowsky 1 year ago
Mi sto chiedendo cosa ti può aver fatto la Argerich perché tu riempia YT di questi commenti assurdi.
Matteo7419 1 year ago
WOW! This is Amazing. any know what brand piano this is because its the most beautiful piano i've ever heard or is it editing that made it sound like the voice of god. And this is a splendid interpretation
OrganizationX000 2 years ago 25
@OrganizationX000 Pollini is a Steinway artist so its probably a Steinway.
dmcII 1 year ago
@OrganizationX000: I think he plays Steinway the vast majority of the time. Steinways do have their weaknesses though, as all pianos do.
mathpianist93 1 year ago
@OrganizationX000 its for sure a Steinway and the recording was done in very good condition with deutsche grammophone as I remember.
The disc was a sensation when it came out and made pollini famous. His integrale of debussy etudes life in Paris was another sensation....
His Beethoven sonatas are much less interesting
uhartchristian 1 year ago
if you had the money to buy this piano, than you wouldn't had to ask... : )
RemovdSande11 1 year ago
Why are we so worried about whether it was played at once or in stages? It's a recording, not a Guinness Book feat. Impressive if he nailed it in one sitting, but I also appreciate music that was honed with the help of editing, to deliver the most rewarding listening experience.
druidmechanics 2 years ago 3
@druidmechanics Agree - It is normal that all records become stage by stage. If he wished to play for one approach it would be not easier to organise simply concert and to write down from it etudes?) For me - this interpritation of this piece absolutle fantastic! And i don't worry about the way ofrecording.
OlegGultayev 2 years ago
Somehow I doubt Pollini or any of the top player out there would stoop to overdubbing. He's probably played this piece since he was a teenager.
CDonches 2 years ago 2
C'est le meilleur, pas de précipitation, toutes les notes sont là. La main gauche est magnifique. Quelle leçon. On est pétrifié de joie.
Volanges100 2 years ago 3
Comment removed
mdeonx16 2 years ago
@mdeonx16 You should see Yundi Li.
ilikehaku1100 2 years ago 2
Comment removed
Rigel1033 2 years ago
@ilikehaku1100 You should see Chopin
Rigel1033 2 years ago 2
I heard that he recorded all the etudes every bar individual.
Rigel1033 2 years ago
Basically, every studio recording has countless edits in it. I'm not sure if they're every measure (since it's such a short and concentrated piece). However, I would not be surprised if Pollini could absolutely nail this piece live. =)
OrangeSodaKing 2 years ago
this rendition is uncommonly and beautifully articulate. Pollini truly understands Chopin's études, down to their very fundamentals.
eiweissexperience 2 years ago 3
amazing..
those chords!
Nycago 2 years ago
his master was arturo benedetto michelangeli...no words.
zorablu 2 years ago
This is the best interpretation of this Etude.. The Etudes are pieces of technique and showmanship. Pollini's interpretation creates magic. He puts his own emotion in it without disrupting the beauty of the song. It's crisp, fresh, and beautiful.
TayuyaCS2 2 years ago 4
Pollini owns Chopin Etudes.
Angel94angel94 2 years ago 41
@Angel94angel94,
Chopin's Etudes belong to the world . . .
ThePaczki 1 year ago
@Angel94angel94 Agreed!!!
ke7hbi 1 year ago
@Angel94angel94 ...and the preludes, too . These recordings are , as a whole, the best.
77orchidjim 1 year ago
@Angel94angel94 Of course,he has the best version of Chopin etudes.I agree with you
noblechopin 1 year ago
Incredibile.....
Barbapippo 2 years ago
I love Pollini's style
Ashkenazy's is a little bit stiffer
sara7628 2 years ago
fantastico....
albagilli 2 years ago 5
I'd have to agree with ruimanak. I never realized this before now I'd have to say some people put too much emotion into pieces that don't require it. For instance how do you put emotion into a song like that entertainer it's supposed to be a rigid march. I believe that this song was intended without much emotion. So I have to say that I believe this is the best interpretation of the song.
cody55909 2 years ago
Pollini has in my view created novelty in how he plays Chopin. In fact, I consider it as an innovative comprehension of Chopin and his music that searches its equal in the whole of musical performance history. This is so much the more true for how he played the Etudes. He gave his Chopin a quality of authenticity and, should I say, objectiveness, that I haven't heard with any other pianist. For the op. 10/1 Etude, I also consider the renderings by Richter and Gavrilov very to the point.
ipublica 2 years ago 4
yeah best better, who knows. i give the nod to Ashkenazy for the musicality and being live. this is very good but borders on mechanical.
trevjr 2 years ago
I meant his interpretation of Chopin's "études". And even Chopin said what i said about excessive emotions and how they "tore the musical structure" originally intended.
Ruimanuk 2 years ago
Excessfull emotions ruins a piece. I think Pollini just got the perfect balance between transparence and emotions on his "études".
Ruimanuk 2 years ago
I disagree on Ashkenzy. Pollini has very clear right hand notes and a much better compliment in the bass. I wish some of them would pay more attention to the bass like it was a melody. It can make the piece so much more beautiful, when the right accents are used. Half of them do a hammer job on the left hand, and have no building process in it. Argerich played it fast but I didn't like her left hand. Cziffra hammered the left hand and almost missed some right hand notes. Lisitsa good but slower.
robertslistening 2 years ago 4
Very good... Perfect I'd say... Nevertheless I prefer Ashkenazy version of this etude: he puts much more feeling in his interpretation, anyway showing a perfect technique.
AndreAx1985 2 years ago
I agree. Although Pollini has some of the best, crispest, recordings of the etudes, Ashkenazy's version is better, due to the feeling he puts into it (like you said). Still, this is a five-star!
zowen11 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Argerich played it better than Pollini and Ashkenazy... Listen to her recording
Liebromeistal 2 years ago
I listened to Argerich's recording, and it's pretty good, but I think it's on the borderline of becoming too unsteady. I prefer Pollini and Ashkenazy's because they are more stable. I also liked Ashkenazy's because he did this cool thing with leaving out the pedal on some of the arpeggios. Oh well...
zowen11 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Argerich played it better than Pollini and Ashkenazy... Listen to her recording
Liebromeistal 2 years ago
Perfection. I wonder if I could ever master it at that speed...
NaruSasuFreakYOSH 2 years ago
Astonishing!
beyondthesanity 2 years ago
this is really good. =D all the notes are really clear
nelsyeung 2 years ago 3
Hats off a genius.
killingangel707 2 years ago 3
I believe that the reason he is good is that he is so... honest
alexilmagnifico 2 years ago 3
Pollini set the benchmark with his recordings of the Chopin Etudes. Not my assessment but those of musical critics of the time. Thanks for posting.
vegatrev 2 years ago 2
What is the italian word again, oh thats right: increible.
killingangel707 2 years ago
Comment removed
D0g63rt 2 years ago
you forgot the d.
fortune32 2 years ago 2
and an i...
fortune32 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Beh, Pollini suona questo meglio di Ashkenazy. Lo studio, tra altre cose, e' un esercizio in forza.
mipiacetrazom 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Pollini toca de cojonis
Estonyanovo 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
His technique sucks
Liebromeistal 2 years ago
Comment removed
unnuagedelait 2 years ago 2
Comment removed
unnuagedelait 2 years ago
Your commenting technique could use some improvement.
D0g63rt 2 years ago 2
This has been flagged as spam show
so do u
musicishope15 2 years ago
This is one of My Audition Pieces
STI45 2 years ago
for what did/do you audition?
HjalmarGuitarMaster 2 years ago
For A Music Conservatory
STI45 2 years ago
Cool,Which one?
HjalmarGuitarMaster 2 years ago
Peabody Conservatory
STI45 2 years ago
I want to apologize as I am with stupor of the bottle. But, I have played the piano for quite some time. I would like to interject those whose dream it is to play into the very self. That, though, such people as Chopin are obviously geniuses, they have ultimately, created a shadow of their potential in the social world. Listen. Those of you with such great love for your instrument, remember never to forget the beauty of humanity. And the power of your creation shared with the world.
keithgarry 2 years ago 5
His arpeggios are painfully even :D
morvensky 2 years ago 5
This comment has received too many negative votes show
too stiff a performance.
freeqwerqwer 2 years ago
Where do I find Godowski'S version?
I have made this etude into a canon; it can be found in the UNC music library.
divebrakes 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I sucked this guy's cock once on the road. jeez that was way more arduous that playing this bit of pianistic fluff. he was huge, i could barely breathe and he came in my throat, the bastard.
squoocher 2 years ago
stop commenting on all these videos noone cares and ure jus making urself out to be a slut
123joshyy 2 years ago 2
hahaha
cursestar 2 years ago
Listen Martha's version....and compare:)
Ellinidara 2 years ago
I prefer Pollini's to Martha's
Liebromeistal 2 years ago 3
Ok,that's personal,right opinions.I prefer Martha's version.
Ellinidara 2 years ago
Just beautiful!
gradwhan 2 years ago
What's hardest? this, water wind etude, or black keys etude?
Liebromeistal 2 years ago
This one by far.
pookiehohn 2 years ago
waterwind or winterwind?
vrljikkerssfesst 2 years ago
surprisingly, after a few listens I agree.. lol
This is a better song, but Godowsky just amazed me with the way he took something hard and made it into pure headache-inducing difficulty. They are better than each other in two diff ways.
xboxer4 2 years ago
I find Gadowsky's phrasing to be strangely halting and therefore remote. There is no flow and this peace is about flow.
mc0558 2 years ago
I love Chopin and this piece but, Godowsky took this and turned it into something even better.
xboxer4 2 years ago
godowsky's version is just pure finger practice .
the original one is the best !@
gcaee 2 years ago 3
oh my God. fantastic..
I need to play it now, but this video doesn't encourage me at all. ;D
iloneens 2 years ago
umm... is it me or does this sound better than Argerich's? maybe it's the clarity of the recording...
killingangel707 2 years ago
I love it.... AMAZING
no wonder why it's also known as "waterfall" étude..
Thanks Chopin, thanks Pollini
blueshrania 2 years ago 3
Wow, I thought that the legendary piano virtuosos ceased to exist with the death of Richter, but Pollini proves me wrong.
*tips off hat to Pollini*
imrich6 2 years ago 6
My sentiments exactly
urourogyn 2 years ago 3
HOW HOW HOW HOW
mdoub 2 years ago 2
Very clean and clear.
westcoast033 2 years ago 2
Very virtuosic.
morvensky