they only feel like they have to escuse their own existence and all the time they wasted at universities while the rest of us where fucking their actual wifes, by the way they also "validate" all the crap they have been told to put in student´s heads by adding more crap to so called "official version of science", you could not even find the birth place of Cristobal Columbus but you found the missing link?, like not been able to walk and claim to have swum across the pacific!!! too big for you.
so... let me see i got this straight, now a LEMUR is the missing link between the homo-erectus and the homo-sapiens?
MY EXPLANATION:
this bunch of "repeaters" AKA "scientific comunity" have ditched roman rests found at south america, also covered up rests of cocaine found in mummies in egipt, and a long etc, and someone now has found similarities between this lemur and us (no idea what could that be so special about it) but they can stop this show off now, you would´nt find your own dick!!!!
im not religious. but im also not blown away by this . i think we are still looking for our leap in time . and a 2 minute time line on you tube does not change that
@pgpeachess Drop an apple and witness the awesomeness of gravity. Specific gravity of Hydrogen is 0.070 (googled it) but I didn't know that. Its also quite complex and above me to fully understand. I don't know if the behaviour of hydrogen is a theory of a fact.
- Surely somebody has questioned that some African races may be the link or a more recent part of it? They are older as a race than most. Scientist now suggest that modern humans lived along side Neanderthal man and mated with them.... these guys were essentially going at it with animals!! surely some people can see some key facial characteristics. I feel bad for even suggesting this because its so offending but has anybody disproved this idea?
@iTchySkiDs (OK, no jokes now) I think scientists agree that the crossing never happened since they were a sub-human species. Black people are as evolved as other races and are the same species. Races in science are debatible. Modern humans actually brought neanderthals to extintion. Why would you be offended by a theory? Are you that weak and my last statement was actually true? I hope you proove me wrong!!! I didn't even get offended when you called me a dick, why would u by that?
@TRYCLOPS1 (jokes aside) why are you so committed to the idea of me being a pussy? is this a theory or a fact? (set up for the shot of the century)
But it is a fact that certain races are older than others and over lap Neanderthals. so if a race lived with Neanderthals then is it possible to say they are direct ancestors? or else the link between the two (the missing link) must have vanished due to some unique flaw after evolution pushed it forward to produce modern man.
@iTchySkiDs You don't have to get offended by a hypothesis like that, even if it's wrong, why get offended? Makes no sense, unless you're a really weak individual with a really weak mind (a pussy). And if it's right then take it like a man. (This statement does not apply if you're a woman lol).
@TRYCLOPS1 R.E (You don't have to get offended) I am a male but I could see your misunderstanding. The name itchyskids may imply dirty panties, but it actually means a rash around my bum hole.
I was not offended by your hypothesis, I was just stunned that you claim science to be the pursuit of THEORY? You may well be more scientifically educated than myself but that's simply not true, fact is the objective and frankly you deserve to be dropped on your face to prove gravity once and for all :p
@iTchySkiDs Genetics proved we don't come from Neanderthals... I think that idea has been disproven by the gene analysis. You're getting offended again... Are you a cross between a human and a vagina? xD
@iTchySkiDs Hey anyway... (funny nick by the way lol) If you have time go watch a youtube documentary. Type: Discovering Religion in the search and choose the first one. I think that's one of the most complete educational videos you can find here. Episodes 10 to 12 actually talks about transcitionary fossils to modern humans and their relation to Neanderthals. You will find this very interesting I think. I hope you don't get offended LOL ;)
@TRYCLOPS1 Dude, I'm not getting offended, the guy was all - quote: "but you would turn around any comment to this subject to fit your agenda" and yes I am crossed with a vagina, mostly through choice but not as frequently as I would like. the best time is when I wake up in the morning and a vagina has crossed me and it looks like my penis and beard has been adopted by snails in the night. anyway, I will check that video, I often watch full length docs on youtube.
@iTchySkiDs Cool you're not getting offended LOL. Getting offended is for pussies anyway :P But yeah, that documentary is pretty cool. I think its the most complete thing out there. It talks about pretty much everything and it explains it really good too. The only thing that really sucks is the intro music LOL. It's really lame :P but u know... can't blame the guy for putting up that work. Let me know how you like it and stuff. It doesn't have anything really new but as a general doc is great.
@iTchySkiDs Cool you're not getting offended LOL. Getting offended is for pussies anyway :P But yeah, that documentary is pretty cool. I think its the most complete thing out there. It talks about pretty much everything and it explains it really good too. The only thing that really sucks is the intro music LOL. It's really lame :P but u know... can't blame the guy for putting up that work. Let me know how you like it and stuff. It doesn't have anything really new but as a general doc is great.
@TRYCLOPS1 Discovering Religion 10-12. very good, lots of info to cover the full picture. cheers.
If you enjoy that then you should read Stephan Baxter's Evolution. A fictional evolution to modern man but follows the general theory of evolution and beyond.
@iTchySkiDs Thanks, I will take a look. Yeah, that doc is pretty well done. Dude I just watched a doc on the origins of feathers in birds. Its pretty cool. You should watch it. Birds came from the same family as velociraptors n stuff and raptors had freaking feathers too. And they discovered the microraptor which was a tree glider but not the main ancestor of birds. Check for: The dinosaur feather mystery. And if you like ants, watch: Lord of the Ants. Its awesome. (I'm addicted to science lol)
@iTchySkiDs Hey I think I was wrong here when I said that humans and neanderthals didn't interbreed. I guess they did, but early in their history (in the middle east). At least that's what they say. It's still hypothetical but I think it's the strongest one bcs gene analysis showed that europeans and asians have from 1 to 4% neanderthal. However when cromagnon men invaded europe, they didn't interbreed with neanderthal, they just killed them off. I'm confused now. But wiki said so lol.
@TRYCLOPS1 interesting reference to the gene only being found outside of africa. which is perhaps contradictory with previous claims. il have a look at the doc on feathers.
@iTchySkiDs Yeah. I guess they interbred in their early stages, before they parted ways. Neanderthals were addapted to cold climate as recent studies show, so they probably were the first ones that started loosing melanin on their skins. Maybe that's where lighter skin comes from or it might be something that both addapted independently. It's confusing. They started to evolve more differently when they got isolated from cromagnon during the ice age I think. Yeah look that shit up its awesome!
shek I used to believe that nonsense, but it is all Lies, and Impossible ask any scientist worth his salt.and by the way man has never created any life form from basic chemicals or dust, and if some day they do, guess what shek that would be considered Intelligent design... hmmm
@twincreek2 Humans have actually shaped dogs by breeders for centuries, pidgeons, sheep, cows etc. It's called artificial selection. Some scientist created a group of bacteria designed in the lab. Evolution doesn't explain the origin of life, that's the theory of abiogenesis. Intelligent design is a fraud and presents a very unlikely improbable argument; that all species appeared in their present state at the same time which is more improbable than little by little. It's not science man...
@TRYCLOPS1 Thats pretty interesting Tryman, ALL the examples you gave me would be considered Intelligent design,humans breeding & cross breeding dogs & farm animals& Scientists design bacteria. would you like to try that again?Evolutions Inescapeable problem, Living matter from nonliving matter( not taking parts of exsisting living bacteria) and Everything from nothing( think about ALL the matter in the universe.. ALL FROM NOTHING?? NOT.
@twincreek2 Well, too bad you don't understand. I'll be more than happy to help you or send you links or even explain the little that I know about some of those subjects. You can look it up if you're really interested in finding out for yourself. But if you're just interested in defending pre-existing faith beliefs, I'm just wasting my time talking to you. Not trying to be sarcastic or anything I'm just being honest bro.
@TRYCLOPS1 I am a former Evolutionist, who Now admits it take more faith to believe microbe to man, lets not forget plants & insects, we should be up to our necks in transitionals, why have we never seen a insect to mammal or plant to animal transitional?what was pollinating the flowers before insects came along?DON'T FALL for the the Lie of no GOD your eternity is at stake.
@twincreek2 Oh....... you think insects can become humans... That's not good man. No point in discussing about this topic with you. Peace be with you friend. (Sorry if I seem rude, its not my intention, have a good day)
@TRYCLOPS1 I am a former Evolutionist, who Now admits it take more faith to believe microbe to man, lets not forget plants & insects, we should be up to our necks in transitionals, why have we never seen a insect to mammal or plant to animal transitional?what was pollinating the flowers before insects came along?DON'T FALL for the the Lie of no GOD your eternity is at stake.
jib jib are you saying that you believe that Living matter came from Nonliving matter, You do Realize this is an Imposibility. and do you also subscribe to the Imposible theory that NOTHING CREATED EVERYTHING, think of ALL the Matter out there in the Universe it had to come from somewhere.
@twincreek2 i know you were responding to someone else, but i felt like i could answer your question. Yes, living matter can come from non-living matter. The first cells (basic living unit) formed due to favorable conditions (non-living nutrients and chemicals) in the air and water. They then reproduced and grew more complex over time. Even humans have successfully created a synthetic cell. Life is just matter that was able to reproduce, and thus, evolve with every instance of its reproduction.
@twincreek2 Infact, even more complex chemicals and elements that support life were evolved from simpler matter like hydrogen, and all of this matter came from the one and only - Big Bang. Its a beautifully connected, logical, evidence supported theory. Please read some more on the topic or watch some documentaries its all so enlightening.
Professing to be wise they became Fools,GOD says he Created everything to reproduce after its Kind, That is Exactly what we see today,even in the plant world.are their similarities between man & Ape sure, there are similarities between a car & a Truck not so hard to understand. What came first the woodpeckers Tuff Beak that could smash into a tree at 5 G's or the Cushion to protect his Brain?
@twincreek2 The beak came first and then evolved and got tuffer by smashing it into a tree while simulataneously developing the cushion that protected it's brain.
There are similarities between trucks and cars because they all have a common predacessor in the designs that are used. You could say cars and trucks "evolved" from a similar predacessor (ancestor).
@MEDZMUZIC No you should question it. Thats the whole point and something that isn't looked upon favourably by the church, to any degree. They don't like questions. Look into, do research, open you're eyes, think for yourself. It's not called a fact because not everything can be explained 100% yet. Unlike the church, scientists don't claim to know more than they do.
There's plenty of theories with plenty of evidence that aren't disputed and we take for granted.
@MEDZMUZIC You do know that theories are greater than facts right? Theories are a collection of facts that can be used to make testible predictions not guesses. All theories are facts.
if theories are greater than facts then it wouldn't be called a theory it would be a fact. one true fact is that all is not what it seems to be. we as humans lost our will to adapt by creating a man made environment. you adapt to your natural environment . we rely on technology or "cargo" and yet if there was a e.l.e the ones most prudent to survive are those with no technological advances for they have not lost the will to evolve how many of you can actually survive in a world with no power
@wilmaso Nothing in science is called a fact. Even the idea of gravity. It's still also a theory. A theory in science is the highest level an idea can ever reach. Not believing in the theory of evolution because it's a theory is not believing in gravity too, because there is more evidence supporting evolution than supporting gravity. Scientists are not dickheads that call ideas facts, even if they're actual facts. It is a fact that gravity exists but still a theory in explaining the causes :)
@TRYCLOPS1 this is some what touchy, cuz ppl confuse the two.Like u said Gravity is a theory... but it exists but how do you know gravity exists, therefore it is a theory, but not everything is theory there are facts ....earth science are facts like water +Really cold = ice . theories have not been proven gravity is still a theory bcuz it has not been a proven fact.
@TRYCLOPS1 hmmm... so when a scientist splits an atom they're actually splitting a "theoretical" atom? Doh!
And what the hell do you mean gravity? Gravity's not a bloody theory. its proven fact. Even planets are found by using rules of gravity. "A theory in science is the highest level an idea can ever reach" ... So your home technology only works in theory?
Science is the pursuit of FACTS.
Theories are conclusions based on facts that are subject to change with new evidence.
Respond to this video... you're such a lucky man! there is $250,000 unclaimed prize for anybody that can prove evolution. until then, it's still a THEORY. what is a theory? also, I GUARANTY THAT AS LONG AS GOD EXISTS -FOREVER, ha,ha, ha!- NOBODY ON THIS UNIVERSE CAN PROVE ANY EVOLUTION.
@pgpeachess I don't think that proof is the problem. If evolution is proven then cultures around the world would be proven wrong and disagreement would begin to break into conflict over beliefs.
I believe its been more or less proven but the slightest hole in the plan allows for religious types to deny the possibility. Common sense tells us that woman were not made from the rib of man so religion says if we cant have our undeniable beginning, neither can you Mr Scientist.
@iTchySkiDs the proof is a big problem! but you would turn around any comment to this subject to fit your agenda. if it's scientific, it does not work this way. i'll take to the grave the above guaranty.
@pgpeachess and what exactly is my agenda? more to the point, what is your agenda? how do you think we came to be here?
My opinion on this video is pro-evolution (*hehe, i know). directly related to the contents of the video, so what is there to turn around that is not already the current topic? what are you getting at exactly? you clearly disagree, so what is your beliefs on the subject, what evidence does your opinion hold?
@iTchySkiDs i'm glad you ask, but isn't it clear? there was/is no evolution. it's only a theory. GOD MADE EVERYTHING. if someone believes in something unseen, it's called faith; only humans have it. you have chosen to believe also in something not seen -without evidence- but that's not called faith. you call it an opinion and i could never convince you otherwise. only God could reveal that to you. sorry for taking your time with my comments!
@pgpeachess Religion vs Science. I'm not going down this road. I feel a sense of guilt for disagreeing with anyone who relies on faith in god to protect them from fear of death.
@iTchySkiDs you're so wrong! i do not fear the death of my human body, because my soul will be with the Lord. don't feel guilty for me. where is yours going to be? i'll pray for you!
@pgpeachess lol, ok you missed my point. but each to their own. im sure i will not receive eternal punishment for not following the rules of religion that were really written by man and then edited by man and then interpreted by man. i dont steal, harm or cheat so if there is an afterlife that is based on our actions then im sure i'll be fine. (lets hope im not judged on the copious amounts of porn that i watch :s EEEK!!!)
@iTchySkiDs i did pray for you. "lets hope im not judged" means that there is Someone to judge you. i did not miss any point: this is proof to you -and to myself- that i am guided by the wholly spirit, because it lead to you almost confessing your sins. i was like you, seeing no fault in what i did -didn't "steal, harm or cheat", but salvation only comes from Jesus Christ and not by works. He's knocking at your door: open it! you won't be sorry. I GUARANTY IT! YOU ARE GOING TO BE FINE!
@pgpeachess take it home sister. i plan to live this life as my only life come what may. you are religious and will live your life by rules of religion because of the promise of being with god after you die. good for you. neither is wrong, neither is right. only when we die we will really know.
please, i really dont want to argue about this. its pointless, your religion makes you happy and my beliefs make me happy. lets all be happy.
@f00tstep I did not say will power but will as in being able to ....but i'am starting to believe that as humans we have the capability of changing our own biology trough our environment ....what we went , breathe, feel. This all effects are biochemistry.
How many piltdown man has to be "discovered" before people realize that darwin evolution is wrong? The mere fact that scam like it almost made it as a proof for transistions was a result of people having to much belief in the theory of evolution.
@imbluz Really? Would you care to list the anatomical features which led you to this 'negroid' conclusion? The skull is WT15000 and is known as the turkana boy. He is indeed H ergaster.
@pinktissues According to heart-valve-surgery(dot)com, the first fully-documented human blood transfusion came from a sheep. The 15 year old boy that it was transfused into managed to recover.
@pinktissues The most dangerous thing about interspecies blood transfusions is the possibility of any of the donor's diseases adapting to the recipient's biology. Any diseases that jumped the gap between species would find their new host to be much more vulnerable. Yes they would do tests to make sure that the blood is free of disease, but it usually requires a special test for each disease and I'm sure that you'll find that medical science has shown preference towards researching human disease.
@pinktissues evolution obviously exists. To deny it is like to deny that there's a sun in the sky or a ground below your feet. However humans coming from evolution is debatable but pictures like the ones in this video show clear connection between our skulls now and primates from thousands to millions of years ago. Our skulls used to not look the way they do today, they actually evolved from the neanderthal and several other pre-homo sapien species.
@pinktissues some obvious examples of evolution come from just about every animal except humans. That being the modern dog and cat, rats/mice, sharks/lots of fish/whales, tigers/lions...(goes on). If you look at dinosaur bones/dinosaurs themselves you can make connnections so easily that you simply can't deny evolution unless your just a stubborn knuckle head that just can't take anything else but your own answer for what truth is.
@suckmeballsalot "some obvious examples of evolution come from just about every animal except humans. "
You are joking right? The hominin fossil record (Human ancestors) is about the most complete known. We have tens of thousands of specimens of over 20 species bridging the gap from ape to man.
@bobwebb114 Why? Nature is not a consious entity making active decisions, but the 'loss' isnt really a loss at all. The genetic information is still there but at some point since our divergence with the other apes there was a head to head telomere fusion at 2q13 with the remnants of a redundant centromere at 2q24.
@bobwebb114 Do some research Bobby. We have 46 chromosomes because two of the chromosomes present in other apes combined to form human chromosome 2. You can still see the telomeric DNA where they combined, as well as DNA that once served as a centromere to the second chromosome.
So technically, 47 and 48 are still there. About 5 minutes of research would have answered that. Do yourself a favour and stop getting your science info from a book of myths.
@lickeyman Thank you for the info, I am not studying genetics, however I find the subject fascinating and therefore ask to enhance my knowledge as there is much about that is not true....as I am finding.
I like how the evolution people get into a heavy logical/scientific debate against the Christians and the Christians best defense statements are always: "I'm not a monkey", "Jesus loves you why can't you except that", "If we came from monkeys then where they come from", "Look this book clearly states God made us", You have no proof of evolution, those are fakes and we have proof that a man walked by a temple at so-so date"... You been trolled ;D
i got that. Still this must be promoted as the missing link. we all have to find our own answers and you don't have to like or even accept this. Many people have seen this on tv and are interested in this. It is the proof they have found to be true for them. Now, this video is about a positive discovery made by people digging for facts only. I see what your going towards but you havent actually commented on this video.
tell the world what you think in your way so it can be received.
@GsliMaIiy oh stfu and give it a rest! just accept the fact that our early ancestors were "ape like". Hey... I don't like it all that much myself, but I would rather live my life TRUTHFULLY then living a lie. There has been a number of things Science has proved the bible to be wrong about. And for your "Jesus" there was ten gods before him that were of ancient Egypt, Sumeria, Greece. All born of virgins, all died at age 33, all resurrected again. You need to get over religion... Free yourself.
It's amazing how fast the evolutionary change is happening toward the end.. at the beginning it took a long time to change..but in the end so fast.. I see a big crucial difference in the frontal part of the skull
The missing link is primate reaction to marijuana. What happens when one is stoned? You will eat anything. Before that, primates would eat foods that were very low in calories and protein not enough to gain the energy required for evolution of a modern brain. Out of Africa to the Americas where the weed grew, and one day fire met that weed met animal, and nom nom nom nom. That's why it "works" so perfectly, why prescription drug cabals spend billions to keep it illegal.
That doesn't mean there's no links missing. There's a multitude of evidence missing that links those last few in video together. They will never find it. We transformed from the one to the other without evolution. This is where intervention came in. The Bible was about extraterrestrial "gods" that intervened in our evolution. The Bible is a plagerized and manipulated text, right out of the Sumerian Plaques. Look it up if you don't believe me. EVERYTHING you've been taught is a f'ing LIE!
Ive looked at these bones and all I can say is that I trust the experts to differentiate between "human" and "ape. These skulls look to me like apes. How can we tell the difference
you're kidding, lol look at 0:50 one says 1.8 millions years ago 595 cc and another same time but 850 cc? wtf?? 300 cc of difference. Also almost 400 cc!! difference with only 100 thousands years before and you have the stomach to say it's evolution. Even if it was two different branches, the latter should have been a huge jump. Beside the fact that they are all very different kind of skulls, probably belonging to species that have nothing to do with humans.
Even without any detailed scieintific justification, its so obvious that evolution has occurred throughout the animal kingdom. Look at how similar for example a primate is to a human,eg, positioning of eyes, ears, nose, mouth, nipples, anus, sexual organs. The fact is that humans are animals, however some people will not accept this due to narcissistic or religious grounds. Its sad, since the evidence for evolution is overwhelming if people care to read.
The Missing Link, that is some funny shuff. How long is the chain? How many links are missing. thousands, millions, or even billions. No such animal. Moving along, moving along. Evolution was a lie when it started, and still is still today. How many links are still missing again? I forgot. All of them that's right. The magic no. I guess people going bald is a sign of evolution deciding the climate is so warm so man needs no hair. ROFL DNA U Say, hmmm well give u a cookie.
@outbackjack1974 Evolution is a lie ? Care to explain why we have canine teeth ? Care to explain why human embryos have a tail which is most prominent at 31 to 35 days old ? And along the same line, would you care to explain why humans have a Coccyx ( tailbone ) which is the remnant of a vestigial tail ? Care to explain why our internal organs are arranged so similar to primates ? ... I didn't think so.
@ReneeNme because we do, same reason a pencil has an eraser. because it does. Why does a car have a transmission, because it needs one. Not because it evolved from a hydraulic pump. You people are into this stuff some deep you can even see over the horizon. You people can quantify the existence of anything and not have the first clue as how it came to be. Explain why Saturn has the exact amount of rings is does? Can you account for every particle in the universe at all times?
@outbackjack1974 So the four examples I gave are just coincidences ? Amazing that. So I guess the fact that old world monkeys, great apes and man have eight fingers and opposing thumbs is just another coincidence ? Wow !!! Roll with that idea wildman. ( chuckles )
@ReneeNme You would think if we are descended from monkeys then there would be closer looking companions between monkeys and us, that are more similar to us than the monkey. That's like saying we have a Semi truck and a toy wagon with no other other vehicles in between.
@outbackjack1974 You've fallen into a very common misconception. We have not 'decended from monkeys'. Evolution has occurred through 'splintering' populations.
@proteoid Actually I knew that. I should have said from a common ancestor. Got a question, what is Evolutions end goal. And at what point dose evolution stop? It can't go on forever in one species. If i did man would become something other than man would he not?
@outbackjack1974 Good question, but quite easily addressed. Man no longer needs to evolve, largely due to global industrialisation. In other words, we are no longer in a competitive environment with other animals. We no longer need to worry about running away from tigers, developing natural immunity to disease, competition for food, etc. That is why modern humans are so succesful - we are the ultimate social animal. i.e. look how dependent human babies are on social groups for several years.
@proteoid I don't subscribe to man came from a remote ancestor, but if he did there would need to be more closer versions of man than just the primates. That would be the key to proving evolution to me. Man is very smart compared to primates, so why is there no other form of man, like there is various other forms of animals? There should be something more closely related to man in-between, than a Dang monkey. Common throw me a bone or something. lol
@outbackjack1974 The monkey is not what we have come from, or one of our previous inbetween forms, this is what I'm trying to explain. The human record (so far) can be traced back to homo habilis, through to homo erectus, homo antecessor, homo neanderthal, homo sapiens. Homo habilis will itself have a common ancestor millions of years ago, and from this ancestor there is a line to other primates, chimps, etc. i.e the divergence of hominids away from chimps has been estimated at 2 million years.
@proteoid Yes I know we did not come directly from apes. Kind of odd mankind just learned all a sudden to scribble something in the form or words or pictures down on tablets, or stone, 6, 10,000 years ago. If our ancestors were millions of years old, and were smart enough to survive then why did they not manage to leave any record behind? Not even a single trace of intelligence. Why because they have always been what they were. Not even related to modern man. They were animals we aren't'
@outbackjack1974 regarding intelligence, our ancestral hominids displayed an increase in brain capacity over millions of years. They walked on two legs and could fashion primitive tools out of the environment around them. Your argument is peculiar, because modern day animals cannot scribble things down - yet they are still alive. You dont think we are animals ? We pee, poo, reproduce,breathe, eat, bleed and die. Just like all the other animals on Earth. We are more selfish though.
@proteoid They showed an increased brain capacity? So we have got dumber over time? A crow can fashion a tool, same as a chimp, so that's no argument, If early man had millions of years of evolution behind him, he should have made a rocket and had a wall-mart on mars. In Less than 100 years we went from a wagon to a rockets virtually over night. Evolution has to many holes.
@outbackjack1974 Hahahah your funny. He's showing the brain slowly getting bigger over time. Meaning we have gotten more intellectual, that our brains have constantly been developing over time. Do you not see that? That right there is PROOF of evolution. Animals have evolved as well. Dogs and cats used to be feral millions of years ago. Now they can walk on the feet without using their hands. If that's not enough proof for you nothing is.
Actually the rise of humane civilization is pretty well documented & fits perfectly with evolutionary theory. People are not so naturally smart we have to be taught by other people almost everything that makes us human.
The development of language & agriculture are the reasons for the sudden increase in brain power & rise of the first civilizations, respectively. Large cities simply cannot exist without agriculture, many cultures remain hunter gathers & never made the leap forward yet their brain power is identical to you or I.
@outbackjack1974 Can't tell if your for evolution. But the bible will say that we lived for thousands of years. Science will prove we have been longer and longer over time. Just 300 years ago the avg lifepsan was 30 - 50 now the avg lifespan is 60 - 100 Think about it.
@JamMasterJay63 300 hundred yrs ago man was eating poor foods at least here in America. Other nations that were not faced with colonialism ie China & India stilled thrived with longer ages due to better diets. Thousands of yrs ago man lived longer in areas such as Afrika because of good diet, exercise and less stress.
Als Missing Link bzw. fehlendes Bindeglied wird in der Evolutionsbiologie eine bis zum Zeitpunkt der Entdeckung fehlende Mosaikform bezeichnet, die Merkmale zweier Taxa (also zweier systematisch unterschiedlicher Organismengruppen) aufweist. Sie wird im Rahmen der Evolutionsbiologie als Übergangsform vorhergesagt.
the theory of gravity and the theory of evolution are completely different. dont use that sorry example for back up. lets stick to the point. go read science books you they even tell you evolution takes thosands of years. and you are trying to tell me we have seen it happen in labs? go do your research.
@gregrutz you are slow. i ackoweledge that they were both theories, but they explain compltey differnt things some easier then others. some with actual evidence to back it up. if you have nothing to say pretaning to this subject, we are done here. it was nice teaching you a little thing or two about evolution but i suggest if you are going to argue about go do some research on it, not an elementary lvl course. something more engaging. goodday
@ihmen The full genome is expensive so I don't know where on earth he'll get the funds to do that, but I know he's like a pit bull on this, he's come a long way in the face of a lot of controversy. The skull really is incredibly interesting. When I first heard about it back in 2000 I wasn't really all that interested, but in light of all the new research, I'm slobbering over the potential. It's definitely unique even without the DNA. The bone structure, placement, fibers etc.
@c1zx if you like the star child skull so much why dont you look at skulls of people with hydrocephalus. because thats most likely what the star child skull actually was. sure it doesnt have to be an alien/human hybrid to be interesting. but still, i wouldnt rely on you to get your info from someone like lloyd pye who is bias towards proving whatever crazy conspiracy he makes up.
@ihmen If you had bothered to research the Star Child, you will have seen that hydrocephalus was completely ruled out years ago. That is not what caused the skull of the Star Child, not even close. You can see the results with your own eyes, you don't have to have Lloyd telling you anything, he's conveniently laid it all out for anyone to look if they're interested. Now I will prove something to you, which is what I started on in the very beginning....
@ihmen in the very beginning I said that people get so invested in their ideas that they can't see evidence contrary to their beliefs even when it is right in front of them. What I mean by that, is that SCIENTISTS WILL NOT LOOK AT DATA THAT CONTRADICTS THEIR MODELS once they are invested in them. They won't be interested, they will character assassinate, they won't know and don't have time, they won't be funded so they don't care....etc etc. Here is a perfect example, and you are displaying it
@ihmen It's something that's talked alot about in psychology, the bias of scientists even when they are trying to be non biased. It's very difficult to be non biased, especially when it contradicts a heavily vested interest. Having said that, any scientist that bothers to look at the skull should find it extremely interesting on a number of different levels. Even the bone material is interesting. It's not something seen before, it's like tooth enamel.
@c1zx actually if the starchild was an alien hybrid then the opposite thing would be happening. every scientific organization would be fighting over who gets to research it because if they found it was an alien hybrid they would win nobel prizes, get tons of money, and become hella famous. but the only people interested in it are nutjobs who think humans are bigfoots engineered by aliens. and of course your excuse for this is that theres a global conspiracy within the scientific community.
@ihmen ? The paragraph is so loaded with errors that I don't know where to begin. One only has to look at history to see that new ideas are met with tremendous resistance. No scientific organization will fight to get anything unless they can claim it as theirs. They can't, so they won't. Calling people nut jobs whenever they believe something outside your belief system is in poor form. I don't know anyone saying humans came from big foot. Global conspiracy? WTF? You've got quite an imagination.
starchildproject that would be a dot com after the word.
That is the web site showing all the data on the incredibly unusual skull. Simply look at the data, what you think of the person handling the skull is insignificant unless you think the labs are falsifying the evidence.
@c1zx starchildproject, does that sound like a bias site to you? you think that site wants the star child skull to be proven human? (even though that was already done in 1999). but im asking if the tests really showed that the skull wasnt human, then why dont i see it on the news or in any peer reviewed articles? surely this would be just about the greatest discovery ever made and every news outlet would be reporting on it. but its only on some obscure websites.
OK, for all the people that might be slightly interested in a highly unusual skull, google StarChild project 2010 and read the tons of information and scientific research done on it. However, if the fact that you don't like the person handling the skull turns you off from learning about the skull, then hey, don't bother. The fact that the skull is absolutely fascinating would only pique the interest of a real scientist (which it has by the way).
For anyone interested in the DNA results of the Star Child, you can go see the information for yourself by googling Star Child Llyod Pye DNA 2010. There you can learn all the interesting details of this incredibly interesting skull that is under scientific investigation. There are mainstream scientists that hate Llyod Pye and what he is doing because it flies in the face of their belief. Oh so cherished are their beliefs, that even their beloved scientific ethics fail them.
@c1zx for anyone interested in actual science. you should know that lloyd pye is a science fiction author and believes that humans were a species of bigfoot that were gentically engineered by aliens into modern humans. when he obtained the starchild skull, he immediately concluded it was the product of a human/alien crossbreeding program before he did a single test on it. he also claims humans only use 10% of their brains... any psychology student can tell you he is full of shit.
@ihmen First of all, as a 'scientist', I'm not interested in Llyod Pye's beliefs. I'm interested in the Star Child's DNA results that have been scientifically obtained. All the rest of what you added to the 'data' is irrelevant. It's bias, prejudice and a complete lack of scientific method if you ignore the data because you dislike the 'fellow'. I don't care if he's green with antlers. I'm interested in the skull of the Star Child, which is an incredible find.
@c1zx oh really, you're a scientist? whats your degree in? llyod pye is crazy and i wouldnt trust any DNA test hes done because hes bias towards the star child skull being an alien. if you want a legit DNA test by real scientists then look up DNA testing in 1999 at BOLD, a forensic DNA lab in Vancouver, British Columbia found
@ihmen I see, therefore, I would assume, that you have researched the lab where he had the DNA tests done in order to confirm your accusation that the lab is untrustworthy? Lloyd Pye is not crazy because his beliefs differ from yours. He is highly intelligent. You may not like his belief system, but all I see coming from you is an attempt at character assassination with absolutely no data to refute the results of the DNA testing done on the Star Child. At least show that the lab is no good.
@c1zx im showing that the person is bias towards proving the skull is an alien so its untrustworthy. even though ive just linked you a DNA test done over 10 years ago that already concluded it was human. lloyd pye seriously claims that humans are genetically engineered species of bigfoots, done by aliens. you think thats not crazy? he also says we use 10% of our brain, when any psychologist will tell you thats bullshit. is lloyd pye even a scientist? where did he get his PHD from if he has one.
@ihmen I understand that he wishes that it is an alien skull. I don't think that being genetically engineered is crazy. We do it all the time. There is enough evidence about Bigfoot to convince me that he exists. I've never heard that Bigfoot was engineered to make a human. I doubt that Lloyd Pye ever said that. He has always maintained the story told to him by the people that gave him the skull. That skull came with a story, it didn't pop up out of the blue. He takes the story as true.
@ihmen The 10% of your brain idea was started some time ago and was popular for awhile, I have no idea how much of our brain we use and that's beyond this discussion. As I've said many times, because people have different beliefs doesn't qualify them as 'crazy'. I'm interested in the results of the recent DNA testing of the Star Child. The DNA tests were performed by the National Institutes of Health BLAST program, the results have been verified and repeated because the results are astounding.
@c1zx we use 100% of our brains. and yes sometimes peoples beliefs can qualify them as crazy. like if you go around saying things like you believe you hear voices in your head or that you believe obama is a satanic reptillian shapeshifter, then you're going to be classified as crazy. some of the things lloyd pye says are not that far from this. which is why i wouldnt trust what he says regaurding the skull. does he even have a PHD in anything? or is he just an author?
@ihmen As far as judging whether someone is crazy, that is not an easy task, any psychologist can tell you that. People's belief systems may seem 'crazy' to you, but your belief system may seem crazy to them and around and around and around. So I don't care about Lloyd Pye. I care about the results of the DNA tests and whether the lab is credible. All the rest is trivial gossip.
@ihmen The lab recovered a string of base pairs 342 nucleotides long with NO reference in the NIH database. They also checked for every kind of error possible and repeated the test and reverified the results. Therefore, the skull is extremely unusual and highly interesting. Now, if it can be shown that the lab is fraudulent, or the results faked, that's a different story. Have you even bothered to look at all the information they've gathered on this skull over the last 10 years? It's amazing.
@ihmen Lloyd Pye is not the one doing the research on the skull, he was given the skull in order to manage the project of getting to the origin of the skull since it is so highly unusual. Being a manger of the project handling funding and promotion doesn't require a PHD in biology. The skull is so extraordinary that he has made it a life's work. He simply arranges to get the skull tested, and the information disseminated it's his passion.
@c1zx i wasnt talking about the test. ill get to that later, but im saying lloyd pye says crazy shit and he concluded the starchild skull was an alien human hybrid as soon as he looked at it before doing one test on it. thats completely unscientific. so i wouldnt trust anything he says about it because hes totally bias. as for the test, why havent i heard this on the news or in any peer reviewed scientific journals? why is it only on random conspiracy websites?
@ihmen The tests and results are recent, and like you, many people 'hate Lloyd Pye' for his beliefs. So the results will be met with a lot of resistance, never the less, the results are what matters. Because the results will be so controversial, I think they want to try and map the entire genome of the thing, that should be even more shocking. So it might be awhile before they make the big splash public announcement. There will be fighing over it I'm sure. Just like any new discovery.
@c1zx well ill be waiting to hear this on the news. and for this info to move from random obscure websites into mainstream scientific journals. and i dont hate lloyd pye, i just think his ideas are crazy conspiracy theories and that he doesnt have a formal education in anything he talks about.
@ihmen Well he is presenting the skull and I think he's doing a good job at presenting something that is extremely controversial. He's more of a lecturer author, well suited for presentations. He's been hard at work getting scientists interested in the skull, and raising funds. It's very expensive to do this kind of research and you can imagine that initially no one was interested. More interest is being generated as more science pours in. It takes awhile. I cant' wait for the full genome...
This video ignores all the skulls that defy explanation like the cone head and star child, (not the boarded heads). The evidence is ignored so that the evidence for this theory (ape to man) looks linear, when in fact, skull size has been all over the place.
@c1zx crainial capacity has not been all over the place. the younger the fossils get, the bigger the crainial capacity gets. elongated skulls are explained by manipulation by the parents while the skull is still soft, it doesnt have an effect on brain size. the star child skull is human and can be explained by many known syndromes that produce similar skulls. but the star child skull and elongated skulls are only a few hundred or thousand years old while these fossils are miliions of years old.
@ihmen I think we should be clear on one thing, that head boarding skulls are not the same as the cone heads. It's been postulated that people originally head boarded their children in hopes of creating a similar consciousness of the cone heads. The cone heads were not head boarded, they are another human species, or at least, hominid most likely. People confuse cone heads with head boarding. Headboarding is sort of like Doug and Dave of the crop circles. LOL
@c1zx i never said headboarding, i said manipulation when the skull is still soft. when the skull is soft you can pretty much make it into any shape you want, whether its a flat shape or an elongated shape. im pretty sure theres some tribes even today that elongate the baby skulls. so no, its not another hominid species or else we would have a classification for it. its just a manipulated homo sapien skull. also, they already tested the starchild skull back in 1999, its got normal human DNA.
@ihmen Well that was sort of my point. We don't have a classification for it because #1) It's ignored by American scientists
#2) The earth is littered with impossible ruins of ancient civilizations that NO ONE talks about - these aren't classified either.
#3) My point was that no one will bother to classify evidence if it doesn't look like it will fit into the model they're working on, it's put on a shelf as a (unknown) or it's ignored.
#4) There are many bizarre skulls that aren't classified.
@c1zx i said it doesnt have its own classification because its not another hominid species like you say. it is classified though as homo sapien because it is a homo sapien skull, its just deformed. and just because an individual is deformed that doesnt make that individual its own species. thats not how speciation works. star child is also classified as homo sapien because it is a deformed homo sapien skull. also why should we classify puma punku in evoluitionary theory when its not an organism?
@ihmen The star child has already been PROVEN not to be a deformed homo sapien. Since it has been PROVEN to have DNA of possbile human mother but NO HUMAN FATHER - in fact, nothing matches it, that should spike your curiosity if you were a real scientist. FACT OF THE MATTER is, very few REAL scientists exist, they pander to the media, they pander to popular opinion. Check the facts - the data, I'm not interested in opinions. The star child has PROVEN to be extremely unusual, not a deformity.
@c1zx you say its not human, then one sentence later you say it had a human mother... well the reason why they only found its mothers DNA in that test was because they tested for mitochondrial DNA. if you're aware of mitochondrial DNA, then you would know its passed down by the mother, so getting fathers DNA from mitochondrial DNA is impossible. however, in a chromosomal DNA test, they found it had normal X and Y chromosomes. so its parents were humans and its a human too, its just deformed.
@ihmen Also you said that the star child is human. The DNA tests do not show that. The star child latest DNA results show two possibilities: The mother of the star child is human and the father is not human, and nothing can be found to match OR - The father and the mother were not human, nothing on earth can be found to match. At most, the star child only had a human mother, at least, both parents are non human. Those are the latest findings in DNA (2010).
The skulls are either man or ape. No ape-man delusion. People today have various cranial volume skulls. Children have smaller cranial volumes. Don't be decieved. Your great, great grandpappy was not an ape.
@legion1a i agree but also if you want to know about the missing lix look to the beast people the tories and minder Roy link know one has a film about him on this format why becouse the devil look after it own,and the bones here are not compleat you know the truth since 1975 we have been here 6,000 years the romans di a census 2,000 year or so and simpel math show we had only a few people 6,00 years ago from an INHERITOR
@legion1a The Earth was made 6 billion years ago, not 6 thousand years ago. Whoever told you that was an idiot. I also cant see how this can be one of "Satan's traps", it's just a video. Where's your evidence to prove those bones are fake? Exactly, don't be making wild dumb accusations without even thinking first. Come on.
something in between an ape walking on two "feet", and an ape attempting to talk would be a nigger while arrested as cought smoking crack.
MrElhombresinnombre 4 weeks ago
lol, idiot
zeenyuhrass 1 week ago
@zeenyuhrass
i might be an idiot, but you are going all along with my comments, aren´t you?
i suspect there is something in my thoughts that makes you feel bad about yourself,
that says enough.
PD. YOUR MOM LIKES IDIOTS.
MrElhombresinnombre 1 week ago
they only feel like they have to escuse their own existence and all the time they wasted at universities while the rest of us where fucking their actual wifes, by the way they also "validate" all the crap they have been told to put in student´s heads by adding more crap to so called "official version of science", you could not even find the birth place of Cristobal Columbus but you found the missing link?, like not been able to walk and claim to have swum across the pacific!!! too big for you.
MrElhombresinnombre 4 weeks ago
so... let me see i got this straight, now a LEMUR is the missing link between the homo-erectus and the homo-sapiens?
MY EXPLANATION:
this bunch of "repeaters" AKA "scientific comunity" have ditched roman rests found at south america, also covered up rests of cocaine found in mummies in egipt, and a long etc, and someone now has found similarities between this lemur and us (no idea what could that be so special about it) but they can stop this show off now, you would´nt find your own dick!!!!
MrElhombresinnombre 4 weeks ago
@theonlyone246 you are just F****** CRUEL
aidanproductoins4 1 month ago
im not religious. but im also not blown away by this . i think we are still looking for our leap in time . and a 2 minute time line on you tube does not change that
Crow1234100 2 months ago
@pgpeachess Drop an apple and witness the awesomeness of gravity. Specific gravity of Hydrogen is 0.070 (googled it) but I didn't know that. Its also quite complex and above me to fully understand. I don't know if the behaviour of hydrogen is a theory of a fact.
iTchySkiDs 3 months ago
- Surely somebody has questioned that some African races may be the link or a more recent part of it? They are older as a race than most. Scientist now suggest that modern humans lived along side Neanderthal man and mated with them.... these guys were essentially going at it with animals!! surely some people can see some key facial characteristics. I feel bad for even suggesting this because its so offending but has anybody disproved this idea?
Pyrimids = 4600 yr old
neanderthal = 14000 yr old
iTchySkiDs 4 months ago
@iTchySkiDs (OK, no jokes now) I think scientists agree that the crossing never happened since they were a sub-human species. Black people are as evolved as other races and are the same species. Races in science are debatible. Modern humans actually brought neanderthals to extintion. Why would you be offended by a theory? Are you that weak and my last statement was actually true? I hope you proove me wrong!!! I didn't even get offended when you called me a dick, why would u by that?
TRYCLOPS1 4 months ago
@TRYCLOPS1 (jokes aside) why are you so committed to the idea of me being a pussy? is this a theory or a fact? (set up for the shot of the century)
But it is a fact that certain races are older than others and over lap Neanderthals. so if a race lived with Neanderthals then is it possible to say they are direct ancestors? or else the link between the two (the missing link) must have vanished due to some unique flaw after evolution pushed it forward to produce modern man.
iTchySkiDs 3 months ago
@iTchySkiDs You don't have to get offended by a hypothesis like that, even if it's wrong, why get offended? Makes no sense, unless you're a really weak individual with a really weak mind (a pussy). And if it's right then take it like a man. (This statement does not apply if you're a woman lol).
TRYCLOPS1 4 months ago
@TRYCLOPS1 R.E (You don't have to get offended) I am a male but I could see your misunderstanding. The name itchyskids may imply dirty panties, but it actually means a rash around my bum hole.
I was not offended by your hypothesis, I was just stunned that you claim science to be the pursuit of THEORY? You may well be more scientifically educated than myself but that's simply not true, fact is the objective and frankly you deserve to be dropped on your face to prove gravity once and for all :p
iTchySkiDs 3 months ago
@iTchySkiDs Genetics proved we don't come from Neanderthals... I think that idea has been disproven by the gene analysis. You're getting offended again... Are you a cross between a human and a vagina? xD
TRYCLOPS1 3 months ago
@iTchySkiDs Hey anyway... (funny nick by the way lol) If you have time go watch a youtube documentary. Type: Discovering Religion in the search and choose the first one. I think that's one of the most complete educational videos you can find here. Episodes 10 to 12 actually talks about transcitionary fossils to modern humans and their relation to Neanderthals. You will find this very interesting I think. I hope you don't get offended LOL ;)
TRYCLOPS1 3 months ago
@TRYCLOPS1 Dude, I'm not getting offended, the guy was all - quote: "but you would turn around any comment to this subject to fit your agenda" and yes I am crossed with a vagina, mostly through choice but not as frequently as I would like. the best time is when I wake up in the morning and a vagina has crossed me and it looks like my penis and beard has been adopted by snails in the night. anyway, I will check that video, I often watch full length docs on youtube.
iTchySkiDs 3 months ago
@iTchySkiDs Cool you're not getting offended LOL. Getting offended is for pussies anyway :P But yeah, that documentary is pretty cool. I think its the most complete thing out there. It talks about pretty much everything and it explains it really good too. The only thing that really sucks is the intro music LOL. It's really lame :P but u know... can't blame the guy for putting up that work. Let me know how you like it and stuff. It doesn't have anything really new but as a general doc is great.
TRYCLOPS1 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@iTchySkiDs Cool you're not getting offended LOL. Getting offended is for pussies anyway :P But yeah, that documentary is pretty cool. I think its the most complete thing out there. It talks about pretty much everything and it explains it really good too. The only thing that really sucks is the intro music LOL. It's really lame :P but u know... can't blame the guy for putting up that work. Let me know how you like it and stuff. It doesn't have anything really new but as a general doc is great.
TRYCLOPS1 3 months ago
@TRYCLOPS1 Discovering Religion 10-12. very good, lots of info to cover the full picture. cheers.
If you enjoy that then you should read Stephan Baxter's Evolution. A fictional evolution to modern man but follows the general theory of evolution and beyond.
iTchySkiDs 3 months ago
@iTchySkiDs Thanks, I will take a look. Yeah, that doc is pretty well done. Dude I just watched a doc on the origins of feathers in birds. Its pretty cool. You should watch it. Birds came from the same family as velociraptors n stuff and raptors had freaking feathers too. And they discovered the microraptor which was a tree glider but not the main ancestor of birds. Check for: The dinosaur feather mystery. And if you like ants, watch: Lord of the Ants. Its awesome. (I'm addicted to science lol)
TRYCLOPS1 3 months ago
@iTchySkiDs Hey I think I was wrong here when I said that humans and neanderthals didn't interbreed. I guess they did, but early in their history (in the middle east). At least that's what they say. It's still hypothetical but I think it's the strongest one bcs gene analysis showed that europeans and asians have from 1 to 4% neanderthal. However when cromagnon men invaded europe, they didn't interbreed with neanderthal, they just killed them off. I'm confused now. But wiki said so lol.
TRYCLOPS1 3 months ago
@TRYCLOPS1 interesting reference to the gene only being found outside of africa. which is perhaps contradictory with previous claims. il have a look at the doc on feathers.
iTchySkiDs 3 months ago
@iTchySkiDs Yeah. I guess they interbred in their early stages, before they parted ways. Neanderthals were addapted to cold climate as recent studies show, so they probably were the first ones that started loosing melanin on their skins. Maybe that's where lighter skin comes from or it might be something that both addapted independently. It's confusing. They started to evolve more differently when they got isolated from cromagnon during the ice age I think. Yeah look that shit up its awesome!
TRYCLOPS1 3 months ago
shek I used to believe that nonsense, but it is all Lies, and Impossible ask any scientist worth his salt.and by the way man has never created any life form from basic chemicals or dust, and if some day they do, guess what shek that would be considered Intelligent design... hmmm
twincreek2 5 months ago
@twincreek2 Humans have actually shaped dogs by breeders for centuries, pidgeons, sheep, cows etc. It's called artificial selection. Some scientist created a group of bacteria designed in the lab. Evolution doesn't explain the origin of life, that's the theory of abiogenesis. Intelligent design is a fraud and presents a very unlikely improbable argument; that all species appeared in their present state at the same time which is more improbable than little by little. It's not science man...
TRYCLOPS1 4 months ago
@TRYCLOPS1 Thats pretty interesting Tryman, ALL the examples you gave me would be considered Intelligent design,humans breeding & cross breeding dogs & farm animals& Scientists design bacteria. would you like to try that again?Evolutions Inescapeable problem, Living matter from nonliving matter( not taking parts of exsisting living bacteria) and Everything from nothing( think about ALL the matter in the universe.. ALL FROM NOTHING?? NOT.
twincreek2 4 months ago
@twincreek2 Well, too bad you don't understand. I'll be more than happy to help you or send you links or even explain the little that I know about some of those subjects. You can look it up if you're really interested in finding out for yourself. But if you're just interested in defending pre-existing faith beliefs, I'm just wasting my time talking to you. Not trying to be sarcastic or anything I'm just being honest bro.
TRYCLOPS1 4 months ago
@TRYCLOPS1 I am a former Evolutionist, who Now admits it take more faith to believe microbe to man, lets not forget plants & insects, we should be up to our necks in transitionals, why have we never seen a insect to mammal or plant to animal transitional?what was pollinating the flowers before insects came along?DON'T FALL for the the Lie of no GOD your eternity is at stake.
twincreek2 4 months ago
@twincreek2 Oh....... you think insects can become humans... That's not good man. No point in discussing about this topic with you. Peace be with you friend. (Sorry if I seem rude, its not my intention, have a good day)
TRYCLOPS1 4 months ago
@TRYCLOPS1 I am a former Evolutionist, who Now admits it take more faith to believe microbe to man, lets not forget plants & insects, we should be up to our necks in transitionals, why have we never seen a insect to mammal or plant to animal transitional?what was pollinating the flowers before insects came along?DON'T FALL for the the Lie of no GOD your eternity is at stake.
twincreek2 4 months ago
15 years ago cranial volume of typical long haired guitar player = 30cc.
MisterNifty 5 months ago
jib jib are you saying that you believe that Living matter came from Nonliving matter, You do Realize this is an Imposibility. and do you also subscribe to the Imposible theory that NOTHING CREATED EVERYTHING, think of ALL the Matter out there in the Universe it had to come from somewhere.
twincreek2 6 months ago
@twincreek2 i know you were responding to someone else, but i felt like i could answer your question. Yes, living matter can come from non-living matter. The first cells (basic living unit) formed due to favorable conditions (non-living nutrients and chemicals) in the air and water. They then reproduced and grew more complex over time. Even humans have successfully created a synthetic cell. Life is just matter that was able to reproduce, and thus, evolve with every instance of its reproduction.
shek666 5 months ago
@twincreek2 Infact, even more complex chemicals and elements that support life were evolved from simpler matter like hydrogen, and all of this matter came from the one and only - Big Bang. Its a beautifully connected, logical, evidence supported theory. Please read some more on the topic or watch some documentaries its all so enlightening.
shek666 5 months ago
Professing to be wise they became Fools,GOD says he Created everything to reproduce after its Kind, That is Exactly what we see today,even in the plant world.are their similarities between man & Ape sure, there are similarities between a car & a Truck not so hard to understand. What came first the woodpeckers Tuff Beak that could smash into a tree at 5 G's or the Cushion to protect his Brain?
twincreek2 6 months ago
@twincreek2 The beak came first and then evolved and got tuffer by smashing it into a tree while simulataneously developing the cushion that protected it's brain.
There are similarities between trucks and cars because they all have a common predacessor in the designs that are used. You could say cars and trucks "evolved" from a similar predacessor (ancestor).
MyJibJib 6 months ago
guess we should'nt question why it;s still called "evolution Theory" and not evolution fact ..
MEDZMUZIC 6 months ago
@MEDZMUZIC No you should question it. Thats the whole point and something that isn't looked upon favourably by the church, to any degree. They don't like questions. Look into, do research, open you're eyes, think for yourself. It's not called a fact because not everything can be explained 100% yet. Unlike the church, scientists don't claim to know more than they do.
There's plenty of theories with plenty of evidence that aren't disputed and we take for granted.
Such as The Theory Of Gravity
MyJibJib 6 months ago
@MEDZMUZIC You do know that theories are greater than facts right? Theories are a collection of facts that can be used to make testible predictions not guesses. All theories are facts.
f00tstep 4 months ago
if theories are greater than facts then it wouldn't be called a theory it would be a fact. one true fact is that all is not what it seems to be. we as humans lost our will to adapt by creating a man made environment. you adapt to your natural environment . we rely on technology or "cargo" and yet if there was a e.l.e the ones most prudent to survive are those with no technological advances for they have not lost the will to evolve how many of you can actually survive in a world with no power
wilmaso 4 months ago
@wilmaso Nothing in science is called a fact. Even the idea of gravity. It's still also a theory. A theory in science is the highest level an idea can ever reach. Not believing in the theory of evolution because it's a theory is not believing in gravity too, because there is more evidence supporting evolution than supporting gravity. Scientists are not dickheads that call ideas facts, even if they're actual facts. It is a fact that gravity exists but still a theory in explaining the causes :)
TRYCLOPS1 4 months ago
@TRYCLOPS1 this is some what touchy, cuz ppl confuse the two.Like u said Gravity is a theory... but it exists but how do you know gravity exists, therefore it is a theory, but not everything is theory there are facts ....earth science are facts like water +Really cold = ice . theories have not been proven gravity is still a theory bcuz it has not been a proven fact.
wilmaso 4 months ago
@TRYCLOPS1
adamclark1972uk 4 months ago
@TRYCLOPS1 hmmm... so when a scientist splits an atom they're actually splitting a "theoretical" atom? Doh!
And what the hell do you mean gravity? Gravity's not a bloody theory. its proven fact. Even planets are found by using rules of gravity. "A theory in science is the highest level an idea can ever reach" ... So your home technology only works in theory?
Science is the pursuit of FACTS.
Theories are conclusions based on facts that are subject to change with new evidence.
DICK.
.
iTchySkiDs 4 months ago
@iTchySkiDs Pussy! lol
TRYCLOPS1 4 months ago
@iTchySkiDs how do you prove gravity? why hydrogen does not respond to gravity?
pgpeachess 3 months ago
Comment removed
iTchySkiDs 3 months ago
Respond to this video... you're such a lucky man! there is $250,000 unclaimed prize for anybody that can prove evolution. until then, it's still a THEORY. what is a theory? also, I GUARANTY THAT AS LONG AS GOD EXISTS -FOREVER, ha,ha, ha!- NOBODY ON THIS UNIVERSE CAN PROVE ANY EVOLUTION.
pgpeachess 3 months ago
@pgpeachess I don't think that proof is the problem. If evolution is proven then cultures around the world would be proven wrong and disagreement would begin to break into conflict over beliefs.
I believe its been more or less proven but the slightest hole in the plan allows for religious types to deny the possibility. Common sense tells us that woman were not made from the rib of man so religion says if we cant have our undeniable beginning, neither can you Mr Scientist.
iTchySkiDs 3 months ago
@iTchySkiDs the proof is a big problem! but you would turn around any comment to this subject to fit your agenda. if it's scientific, it does not work this way. i'll take to the grave the above guaranty.
pgpeachess 3 months ago
@pgpeachess and what exactly is my agenda? more to the point, what is your agenda? how do you think we came to be here?
My opinion on this video is pro-evolution (*hehe, i know). directly related to the contents of the video, so what is there to turn around that is not already the current topic? what are you getting at exactly? you clearly disagree, so what is your beliefs on the subject, what evidence does your opinion hold?
iTchySkiDs 3 months ago
@iTchySkiDs i'm glad you ask, but isn't it clear? there was/is no evolution. it's only a theory. GOD MADE EVERYTHING. if someone believes in something unseen, it's called faith; only humans have it. you have chosen to believe also in something not seen -without evidence- but that's not called faith. you call it an opinion and i could never convince you otherwise. only God could reveal that to you. sorry for taking your time with my comments!
pgpeachess 3 months ago
@pgpeachess Religion vs Science. I'm not going down this road. I feel a sense of guilt for disagreeing with anyone who relies on faith in god to protect them from fear of death.
iTchySkiDs 3 months ago
@iTchySkiDs you're so wrong! i do not fear the death of my human body, because my soul will be with the Lord. don't feel guilty for me. where is yours going to be? i'll pray for you!
pgpeachess 3 months ago
@pgpeachess lol, ok you missed my point. but each to their own. im sure i will not receive eternal punishment for not following the rules of religion that were really written by man and then edited by man and then interpreted by man. i dont steal, harm or cheat so if there is an afterlife that is based on our actions then im sure i'll be fine. (lets hope im not judged on the copious amounts of porn that i watch :s EEEK!!!)
iTchySkiDs 3 months ago
@iTchySkiDs i did pray for you. "lets hope im not judged" means that there is Someone to judge you. i did not miss any point: this is proof to you -and to myself- that i am guided by the wholly spirit, because it lead to you almost confessing your sins. i was like you, seeing no fault in what i did -didn't "steal, harm or cheat", but salvation only comes from Jesus Christ and not by works. He's knocking at your door: open it! you won't be sorry. I GUARANTY IT! YOU ARE GOING TO BE FINE!
pgpeachess 3 months ago
@pgpeachess take it home sister. i plan to live this life as my only life come what may. you are religious and will live your life by rules of religion because of the promise of being with god after you die. good for you. neither is wrong, neither is right. only when we die we will really know.
please, i really dont want to argue about this. its pointless, your religion makes you happy and my beliefs make me happy. lets all be happy.
iTchySkiDs 3 months ago
@f00tstep I did not say will power but will as in being able to ....but i'am starting to believe that as humans we have the capability of changing our own biology trough our environment ....what we went , breathe, feel. This all effects are biochemistry.
wilmaso 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
How many piltdown man has to be "discovered" before people realize that darwin evolution is wrong? The mere fact that scam like it almost made it as a proof for transistions was a result of people having to much belief in the theory of evolution.
daogdaog 6 months ago
Exclusive footage of the missing links found @
/watch?v=dQw4w9WgXcQ
TheMessanjah 7 months ago
73 believers in God
SpacewolfCZ 7 months ago
The skull on 1:14 looks very negroid. It is Homo ergaster
imbluz 7 months ago
@imbluz Really? Would you care to list the anatomical features which led you to this 'negroid' conclusion? The skull is WT15000 and is known as the turkana boy. He is indeed H ergaster.
KennyTew2 7 months ago
If evolution is correct then why cant we get blood transfusions from animals... -.-
pinktissues 8 months ago
@pinktissues According to heart-valve-surgery(dot)com, the first fully-documented human blood transfusion came from a sheep. The 15 year old boy that it was transfused into managed to recover.
markermage 8 months ago
@markermage Really? wow thats acctually kinda cool! but i still dnt believe in evolution tho ;) still, thatnks for the info! :)
pinktissues 8 months ago
@pinktissues The most dangerous thing about interspecies blood transfusions is the possibility of any of the donor's diseases adapting to the recipient's biology. Any diseases that jumped the gap between species would find their new host to be much more vulnerable. Yes they would do tests to make sure that the blood is free of disease, but it usually requires a special test for each disease and I'm sure that you'll find that medical science has shown preference towards researching human disease.
markermage 8 months ago
@pinktissues evolution obviously exists. To deny it is like to deny that there's a sun in the sky or a ground below your feet. However humans coming from evolution is debatable but pictures like the ones in this video show clear connection between our skulls now and primates from thousands to millions of years ago. Our skulls used to not look the way they do today, they actually evolved from the neanderthal and several other pre-homo sapien species.
suckmeballsalot 7 months ago
@pinktissues some obvious examples of evolution come from just about every animal except humans. That being the modern dog and cat, rats/mice, sharks/lots of fish/whales, tigers/lions...(goes on). If you look at dinosaur bones/dinosaurs themselves you can make connnections so easily that you simply can't deny evolution unless your just a stubborn knuckle head that just can't take anything else but your own answer for what truth is.
suckmeballsalot 7 months ago
@suckmeballsalot "some obvious examples of evolution come from just about every animal except humans. "
You are joking right? The hominin fossil record (Human ancestors) is about the most complete known. We have tens of thousands of specimens of over 20 species bridging the gap from ape to man.
I agree with the rest of your comment though.
KennyTew2 7 months ago
@KennyTew2 wow, didn't know that's how solid our case of human fossils was. That's good to know. Thanks for pointing that out.
suckmeballsalot 7 months ago
@KennyTew2 Why has nature done away with 2 chromosomes in the change from ape to man then as we have 46 but apes have 48?
bobwebb114 6 months ago
@bobwebb114 Why? Nature is not a consious entity making active decisions, but the 'loss' isnt really a loss at all. The genetic information is still there but at some point since our divergence with the other apes there was a head to head telomere fusion at 2q13 with the remnants of a redundant centromere at 2q24.
KennyTew2 6 months ago
@bobwebb114 Do some research Bobby. We have 46 chromosomes because two of the chromosomes present in other apes combined to form human chromosome 2. You can still see the telomeric DNA where they combined, as well as DNA that once served as a centromere to the second chromosome.
So technically, 47 and 48 are still there. About 5 minutes of research would have answered that. Do yourself a favour and stop getting your science info from a book of myths.
lickeyman 6 months ago
@lickeyman Thank you for the info, I am not studying genetics, however I find the subject fascinating and therefore ask to enhance my knowledge as there is much about that is not true....as I am finding.
bobwebb114 6 months ago
I like how the evolution people get into a heavy logical/scientific debate against the Christians and the Christians best defense statements are always: "I'm not a monkey", "Jesus loves you why can't you except that", "If we came from monkeys then where they come from", "Look this book clearly states God made us", You have no proof of evolution, those are fakes and we have proof that a man walked by a temple at so-so date"... You been trolled ;D
cjmilla1 8 months ago
hallelujah! Evolution real!!!!!!
TheRegorbuck 8 months ago
OMG ALRIGHT EYEN by PLAID
I TOTALLY FORGOT ABOUT THIS SONG THANKS FOR THE REMINDER
Thed00rs35 8 months ago
there was like*
Severe777 9 months ago
Comment removed
ripticdu 9 months ago
Jesus Is God
1. Jesus Christ fulfills over 2-0-0 Old Testament Messianic Prophecies ( Isaiah 9:6-7; etc.) Google Messianic Prophecies fulfilled by Jesus.
2. Jesus Christ makes 30 “I AM” statements in the Gospel of John.
a. “… for unless you believe that I am, you shall die in your sins.” (John 8:24)
Check the Gospel of John in the New Testament.
3. 17 Secular sources confirm that Jesus Christ walked the earth (Celsus, Tacitus, Lucian, etc.) Google Secular sources for Jesus.
GsliMaIiy 10 months ago
@GsliMaIiy
i got that. Still this must be promoted as the missing link. we all have to find our own answers and you don't have to like or even accept this. Many people have seen this on tv and are interested in this. It is the proof they have found to be true for them. Now, this video is about a positive discovery made by people digging for facts only. I see what your going towards but you havent actually commented on this video.
tell the world what you think in your way so it can be received.
tjkaraba 9 months ago
@GsliMaIiy oh stfu and give it a rest! just accept the fact that our early ancestors were "ape like". Hey... I don't like it all that much myself, but I would rather live my life TRUTHFULLY then living a lie. There has been a number of things Science has proved the bible to be wrong about. And for your "Jesus" there was ten gods before him that were of ancient Egypt, Sumeria, Greece. All born of virgins, all died at age 33, all resurrected again. You need to get over religion... Free yourself.
Severe777 9 months ago
@GsliMaIiy You're a freak.
NeverContactMe 7 months ago
It's amazing how fast the evolutionary change is happening toward the end.. at the beginning it took a long time to change..but in the end so fast.. I see a big crucial difference in the frontal part of the skull
EuropeanGuy87 10 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
what a fucking joke....
PassFissn 10 months ago
so if someone were to live a couple hundred thousand years they woudl be screwed basically??
umtydnoia 10 months ago
@umtydnoia Even if you are to live up to 300 yrs.you will end up going ballistic nuts, dementia.. everything has it's limit..
EuropeanGuy87 10 months ago
@umtydnoia Yeah our descendants will think the same after few hundreds of thousands years from now.
SloveintzWend 10 months ago
The missing link is primate reaction to marijuana. What happens when one is stoned? You will eat anything. Before that, primates would eat foods that were very low in calories and protein not enough to gain the energy required for evolution of a modern brain. Out of Africa to the Americas where the weed grew, and one day fire met that weed met animal, and nom nom nom nom. That's why it "works" so perfectly, why prescription drug cabals spend billions to keep it illegal.
JamesTKirkCobain 1 year ago
That doesn't mean there's no links missing. There's a multitude of evidence missing that links those last few in video together. They will never find it. We transformed from the one to the other without evolution. This is where intervention came in. The Bible was about extraterrestrial "gods" that intervened in our evolution. The Bible is a plagerized and manipulated text, right out of the Sumerian Plaques. Look it up if you don't believe me. EVERYTHING you've been taught is a f'ing LIE!
Fesheca 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
The point is that creationists ARE the missing link between primitive apes and homo sapiens.
saamohod 1 year ago
. . .
punkypunkza 1 year ago
Ive looked at these bones and all I can say is that I trust the experts to differentiate between "human" and "ape. These skulls look to me like apes. How can we tell the difference
Bob
labyonnette 1 year ago
you're kidding, lol look at 0:50 one says 1.8 millions years ago 595 cc and another same time but 850 cc? wtf?? 300 cc of difference. Also almost 400 cc!! difference with only 100 thousands years before and you have the stomach to say it's evolution. Even if it was two different branches, the latter should have been a huge jump. Beside the fact that they are all very different kind of skulls, probably belonging to species that have nothing to do with humans.
fresniak 1 year ago
Even without any detailed scieintific justification, its so obvious that evolution has occurred throughout the animal kingdom. Look at how similar for example a primate is to a human,eg, positioning of eyes, ears, nose, mouth, nipples, anus, sexual organs. The fact is that humans are animals, however some people will not accept this due to narcissistic or religious grounds. Its sad, since the evidence for evolution is overwhelming if people care to read.
proteoid 1 year ago
The Missing Link, that is some funny shuff. How long is the chain? How many links are missing. thousands, millions, or even billions. No such animal. Moving along, moving along. Evolution was a lie when it started, and still is still today. How many links are still missing again? I forgot. All of them that's right. The magic no. I guess people going bald is a sign of evolution deciding the climate is so warm so man needs no hair. ROFL DNA U Say, hmmm well give u a cookie.
outbackjack1974 1 year ago
@outbackjack1974 Evolution is a lie ? Care to explain why we have canine teeth ? Care to explain why human embryos have a tail which is most prominent at 31 to 35 days old ? And along the same line, would you care to explain why humans have a Coccyx ( tailbone ) which is the remnant of a vestigial tail ? Care to explain why our internal organs are arranged so similar to primates ? ... I didn't think so.
ReneeNme 1 year ago
@ReneeNme because we do, same reason a pencil has an eraser. because it does. Why does a car have a transmission, because it needs one. Not because it evolved from a hydraulic pump. You people are into this stuff some deep you can even see over the horizon. You people can quantify the existence of anything and not have the first clue as how it came to be. Explain why Saturn has the exact amount of rings is does? Can you account for every particle in the universe at all times?
outbackjack1974 1 year ago
@outbackjack1974 So the four examples I gave are just coincidences ? Amazing that. So I guess the fact that old world monkeys, great apes and man have eight fingers and opposing thumbs is just another coincidence ? Wow !!! Roll with that idea wildman. ( chuckles )
ReneeNme 1 year ago
@ReneeNme You would think if we are descended from monkeys then there would be closer looking companions between monkeys and us, that are more similar to us than the monkey. That's like saying we have a Semi truck and a toy wagon with no other other vehicles in between.
outbackjack1974 1 year ago
@outbackjack1974 You've fallen into a very common misconception. We have not 'decended from monkeys'. Evolution has occurred through 'splintering' populations.
proteoid 1 year ago
@proteoid Actually I knew that. I should have said from a common ancestor. Got a question, what is Evolutions end goal. And at what point dose evolution stop? It can't go on forever in one species. If i did man would become something other than man would he not?
outbackjack1974 1 year ago
@outbackjack1974 Good question, but quite easily addressed. Man no longer needs to evolve, largely due to global industrialisation. In other words, we are no longer in a competitive environment with other animals. We no longer need to worry about running away from tigers, developing natural immunity to disease, competition for food, etc. That is why modern humans are so succesful - we are the ultimate social animal. i.e. look how dependent human babies are on social groups for several years.
proteoid 1 year ago
@proteoid I don't subscribe to man came from a remote ancestor, but if he did there would need to be more closer versions of man than just the primates. That would be the key to proving evolution to me. Man is very smart compared to primates, so why is there no other form of man, like there is various other forms of animals? There should be something more closely related to man in-between, than a Dang monkey. Common throw me a bone or something. lol
outbackjack1974 1 year ago
@outbackjack1974 The monkey is not what we have come from, or one of our previous inbetween forms, this is what I'm trying to explain. The human record (so far) can be traced back to homo habilis, through to homo erectus, homo antecessor, homo neanderthal, homo sapiens. Homo habilis will itself have a common ancestor millions of years ago, and from this ancestor there is a line to other primates, chimps, etc. i.e the divergence of hominids away from chimps has been estimated at 2 million years.
proteoid 1 year ago
@proteoid Yes I know we did not come directly from apes. Kind of odd mankind just learned all a sudden to scribble something in the form or words or pictures down on tablets, or stone, 6, 10,000 years ago. If our ancestors were millions of years old, and were smart enough to survive then why did they not manage to leave any record behind? Not even a single trace of intelligence. Why because they have always been what they were. Not even related to modern man. They were animals we aren't'
outbackjack1974 1 year ago
@outbackjack1974 regarding intelligence, our ancestral hominids displayed an increase in brain capacity over millions of years. They walked on two legs and could fashion primitive tools out of the environment around them. Your argument is peculiar, because modern day animals cannot scribble things down - yet they are still alive. You dont think we are animals ? We pee, poo, reproduce,breathe, eat, bleed and die. Just like all the other animals on Earth. We are more selfish though.
proteoid 1 year ago
@proteoid They showed an increased brain capacity? So we have got dumber over time? A crow can fashion a tool, same as a chimp, so that's no argument, If early man had millions of years of evolution behind him, he should have made a rocket and had a wall-mart on mars. In Less than 100 years we went from a wagon to a rockets virtually over night. Evolution has to many holes.
outbackjack1974 1 year ago
@outbackjack1974 Hahahah your funny. He's showing the brain slowly getting bigger over time. Meaning we have gotten more intellectual, that our brains have constantly been developing over time. Do you not see that? That right there is PROOF of evolution. Animals have evolved as well. Dogs and cats used to be feral millions of years ago. Now they can walk on the feet without using their hands. If that's not enough proof for you nothing is.
JamMasterJay63 1 year ago
@outbackjack1974 If you read the literature, you'll know that you are hugely generalising things here. Im guessing that you are a Christian ?
proteoid 1 year ago
@outbackjack1974
Actually the rise of humane civilization is pretty well documented & fits perfectly with evolutionary theory. People are not so naturally smart we have to be taught by other people almost everything that makes us human.
RedlineMMA 1 year ago
@outbackjack1974
The development of language & agriculture are the reasons for the sudden increase in brain power & rise of the first civilizations, respectively. Large cities simply cannot exist without agriculture, many cultures remain hunter gathers & never made the leap forward yet their brain power is identical to you or I.
RedlineMMA 1 year ago
@outbackjack1974 Can't tell if your for evolution. But the bible will say that we lived for thousands of years. Science will prove we have been longer and longer over time. Just 300 years ago the avg lifepsan was 30 - 50 now the avg lifespan is 60 - 100 Think about it.
JamMasterJay63 1 year ago
@JamMasterJay63 300 hundred yrs ago man was eating poor foods at least here in America. Other nations that were not faced with colonialism ie China & India stilled thrived with longer ages due to better diets. Thousands of yrs ago man lived longer in areas such as Afrika because of good diet, exercise and less stress.
HeruTutankhamun 11 months ago
Als Missing Link bzw. fehlendes Bindeglied wird in der Evolutionsbiologie eine bis zum Zeitpunkt der Entdeckung fehlende Mosaikform bezeichnet, die Merkmale zweier Taxa (also zweier systematisch unterschiedlicher Organismengruppen) aufweist. Sie wird im Rahmen der Evolutionsbiologie als Übergangsform vorhergesagt.
DesireMiru 1 year ago
Lie on a lie
goodnoah 1 year ago
the theory of gravity and the theory of evolution are completely different. dont use that sorry example for back up. lets stick to the point. go read science books you they even tell you evolution takes thosands of years. and you are trying to tell me we have seen it happen in labs? go do your research.
XxDaGGa 1 year ago
@XxDaGGa you are slow. They are both theories, they both discribe how a process happens.
gregrutz 1 year ago
@gregrutz you are slow. i ackoweledge that they were both theories, but they explain compltey differnt things some easier then others. some with actual evidence to back it up. if you have nothing to say pretaning to this subject, we are done here. it was nice teaching you a little thing or two about evolution but i suggest if you are going to argue about go do some research on it, not an elementary lvl course. something more engaging. goodday
XxDaGGa 1 year ago
All you have to do is look at Andre the Giant and know that neanderthal is alive and well today.
c1zx 1 year ago
@ihmen The full genome is expensive so I don't know where on earth he'll get the funds to do that, but I know he's like a pit bull on this, he's come a long way in the face of a lot of controversy. The skull really is incredibly interesting. When I first heard about it back in 2000 I wasn't really all that interested, but in light of all the new research, I'm slobbering over the potential. It's definitely unique even without the DNA. The bone structure, placement, fibers etc.
c1zx 1 year ago
@c1zx if you like the star child skull so much why dont you look at skulls of people with hydrocephalus. because thats most likely what the star child skull actually was. sure it doesnt have to be an alien/human hybrid to be interesting. but still, i wouldnt rely on you to get your info from someone like lloyd pye who is bias towards proving whatever crazy conspiracy he makes up.
ihmen 1 year ago
@ihmen If you had bothered to research the Star Child, you will have seen that hydrocephalus was completely ruled out years ago. That is not what caused the skull of the Star Child, not even close. You can see the results with your own eyes, you don't have to have Lloyd telling you anything, he's conveniently laid it all out for anyone to look if they're interested. Now I will prove something to you, which is what I started on in the very beginning....
c1zx 1 year ago
@ihmen in the very beginning I said that people get so invested in their ideas that they can't see evidence contrary to their beliefs even when it is right in front of them. What I mean by that, is that SCIENTISTS WILL NOT LOOK AT DATA THAT CONTRADICTS THEIR MODELS once they are invested in them. They won't be interested, they will character assassinate, they won't know and don't have time, they won't be funded so they don't care....etc etc. Here is a perfect example, and you are displaying it
c1zx 1 year ago
@ihmen It's something that's talked alot about in psychology, the bias of scientists even when they are trying to be non biased. It's very difficult to be non biased, especially when it contradicts a heavily vested interest. Having said that, any scientist that bothers to look at the skull should find it extremely interesting on a number of different levels. Even the bone material is interesting. It's not something seen before, it's like tooth enamel.
c1zx 1 year ago
@c1zx actually if the starchild was an alien hybrid then the opposite thing would be happening. every scientific organization would be fighting over who gets to research it because if they found it was an alien hybrid they would win nobel prizes, get tons of money, and become hella famous. but the only people interested in it are nutjobs who think humans are bigfoots engineered by aliens. and of course your excuse for this is that theres a global conspiracy within the scientific community.
ihmen 1 year ago
@ihmen ? The paragraph is so loaded with errors that I don't know where to begin. One only has to look at history to see that new ideas are met with tremendous resistance. No scientific organization will fight to get anything unless they can claim it as theirs. They can't, so they won't. Calling people nut jobs whenever they believe something outside your belief system is in poor form. I don't know anyone saying humans came from big foot. Global conspiracy? WTF? You've got quite an imagination.
c1zx 1 year ago
starchildproject that would be a dot com after the word.
That is the web site showing all the data on the incredibly unusual skull. Simply look at the data, what you think of the person handling the skull is insignificant unless you think the labs are falsifying the evidence.
c1zx 1 year ago
@c1zx starchildproject, does that sound like a bias site to you? you think that site wants the star child skull to be proven human? (even though that was already done in 1999). but im asking if the tests really showed that the skull wasnt human, then why dont i see it on the news or in any peer reviewed articles? surely this would be just about the greatest discovery ever made and every news outlet would be reporting on it. but its only on some obscure websites.
ihmen 1 year ago
Comment removed
c1zx 1 year ago
OK, for all the people that might be slightly interested in a highly unusual skull, google StarChild project 2010 and read the tons of information and scientific research done on it. However, if the fact that you don't like the person handling the skull turns you off from learning about the skull, then hey, don't bother. The fact that the skull is absolutely fascinating would only pique the interest of a real scientist (which it has by the way).
c1zx 1 year ago
Oops I misspelled that, It's Lloyd Pye, DNA results Star Child 2010 or latest results - google that.
c1zx 1 year ago
For anyone interested in the DNA results of the Star Child, you can go see the information for yourself by googling Star Child Llyod Pye DNA 2010. There you can learn all the interesting details of this incredibly interesting skull that is under scientific investigation. There are mainstream scientists that hate Llyod Pye and what he is doing because it flies in the face of their belief. Oh so cherished are their beliefs, that even their beloved scientific ethics fail them.
c1zx 1 year ago
@c1zx for anyone interested in actual science. you should know that lloyd pye is a science fiction author and believes that humans were a species of bigfoot that were gentically engineered by aliens into modern humans. when he obtained the starchild skull, he immediately concluded it was the product of a human/alien crossbreeding program before he did a single test on it. he also claims humans only use 10% of their brains... any psychology student can tell you he is full of shit.
ihmen 1 year ago
@ihmen First of all, as a 'scientist', I'm not interested in Llyod Pye's beliefs. I'm interested in the Star Child's DNA results that have been scientifically obtained. All the rest of what you added to the 'data' is irrelevant. It's bias, prejudice and a complete lack of scientific method if you ignore the data because you dislike the 'fellow'. I don't care if he's green with antlers. I'm interested in the skull of the Star Child, which is an incredible find.
c1zx 1 year ago
@c1zx oh really, you're a scientist? whats your degree in? llyod pye is crazy and i wouldnt trust any DNA test hes done because hes bias towards the star child skull being an alien. if you want a legit DNA test by real scientists then look up DNA testing in 1999 at BOLD, a forensic DNA lab in Vancouver, British Columbia found
ihmen 1 year ago
@ihmen I see, therefore, I would assume, that you have researched the lab where he had the DNA tests done in order to confirm your accusation that the lab is untrustworthy? Lloyd Pye is not crazy because his beliefs differ from yours. He is highly intelligent. You may not like his belief system, but all I see coming from you is an attempt at character assassination with absolutely no data to refute the results of the DNA testing done on the Star Child. At least show that the lab is no good.
c1zx 1 year ago
@c1zx im showing that the person is bias towards proving the skull is an alien so its untrustworthy. even though ive just linked you a DNA test done over 10 years ago that already concluded it was human. lloyd pye seriously claims that humans are genetically engineered species of bigfoots, done by aliens. you think thats not crazy? he also says we use 10% of our brain, when any psychologist will tell you thats bullshit. is lloyd pye even a scientist? where did he get his PHD from if he has one.
ihmen 1 year ago
@ihmen I understand that he wishes that it is an alien skull. I don't think that being genetically engineered is crazy. We do it all the time. There is enough evidence about Bigfoot to convince me that he exists. I've never heard that Bigfoot was engineered to make a human. I doubt that Lloyd Pye ever said that. He has always maintained the story told to him by the people that gave him the skull. That skull came with a story, it didn't pop up out of the blue. He takes the story as true.
c1zx 1 year ago
@ihmen The 10% of your brain idea was started some time ago and was popular for awhile, I have no idea how much of our brain we use and that's beyond this discussion. As I've said many times, because people have different beliefs doesn't qualify them as 'crazy'. I'm interested in the results of the recent DNA testing of the Star Child. The DNA tests were performed by the National Institutes of Health BLAST program, the results have been verified and repeated because the results are astounding.
c1zx 1 year ago
@c1zx we use 100% of our brains. and yes sometimes peoples beliefs can qualify them as crazy. like if you go around saying things like you believe you hear voices in your head or that you believe obama is a satanic reptillian shapeshifter, then you're going to be classified as crazy. some of the things lloyd pye says are not that far from this. which is why i wouldnt trust what he says regaurding the skull. does he even have a PHD in anything? or is he just an author?
ihmen 1 year ago
@ihmen As far as judging whether someone is crazy, that is not an easy task, any psychologist can tell you that. People's belief systems may seem 'crazy' to you, but your belief system may seem crazy to them and around and around and around. So I don't care about Lloyd Pye. I care about the results of the DNA tests and whether the lab is credible. All the rest is trivial gossip.
c1zx 1 year ago
@ihmen The lab recovered a string of base pairs 342 nucleotides long with NO reference in the NIH database. They also checked for every kind of error possible and repeated the test and reverified the results. Therefore, the skull is extremely unusual and highly interesting. Now, if it can be shown that the lab is fraudulent, or the results faked, that's a different story. Have you even bothered to look at all the information they've gathered on this skull over the last 10 years? It's amazing.
c1zx 1 year ago
@ihmen Lloyd Pye is not the one doing the research on the skull, he was given the skull in order to manage the project of getting to the origin of the skull since it is so highly unusual. Being a manger of the project handling funding and promotion doesn't require a PHD in biology. The skull is so extraordinary that he has made it a life's work. He simply arranges to get the skull tested, and the information disseminated it's his passion.
c1zx 1 year ago
@c1zx i wasnt talking about the test. ill get to that later, but im saying lloyd pye says crazy shit and he concluded the starchild skull was an alien human hybrid as soon as he looked at it before doing one test on it. thats completely unscientific. so i wouldnt trust anything he says about it because hes totally bias. as for the test, why havent i heard this on the news or in any peer reviewed scientific journals? why is it only on random conspiracy websites?
ihmen 1 year ago
@ihmen The tests and results are recent, and like you, many people 'hate Lloyd Pye' for his beliefs. So the results will be met with a lot of resistance, never the less, the results are what matters. Because the results will be so controversial, I think they want to try and map the entire genome of the thing, that should be even more shocking. So it might be awhile before they make the big splash public announcement. There will be fighing over it I'm sure. Just like any new discovery.
c1zx 1 year ago
@c1zx well ill be waiting to hear this on the news. and for this info to move from random obscure websites into mainstream scientific journals. and i dont hate lloyd pye, i just think his ideas are crazy conspiracy theories and that he doesnt have a formal education in anything he talks about.
ihmen 1 year ago
@ihmen Well he is presenting the skull and I think he's doing a good job at presenting something that is extremely controversial. He's more of a lecturer author, well suited for presentations. He's been hard at work getting scientists interested in the skull, and raising funds. It's very expensive to do this kind of research and you can imagine that initially no one was interested. More interest is being generated as more science pours in. It takes awhile. I cant' wait for the full genome...
c1zx 1 year ago
This video ignores all the skulls that defy explanation like the cone head and star child, (not the boarded heads). The evidence is ignored so that the evidence for this theory (ape to man) looks linear, when in fact, skull size has been all over the place.
c1zx 1 year ago
@c1zx crainial capacity has not been all over the place. the younger the fossils get, the bigger the crainial capacity gets. elongated skulls are explained by manipulation by the parents while the skull is still soft, it doesnt have an effect on brain size. the star child skull is human and can be explained by many known syndromes that produce similar skulls. but the star child skull and elongated skulls are only a few hundred or thousand years old while these fossils are miliions of years old.
ihmen 1 year ago
@ihmen I think we should be clear on one thing, that head boarding skulls are not the same as the cone heads. It's been postulated that people originally head boarded their children in hopes of creating a similar consciousness of the cone heads. The cone heads were not head boarded, they are another human species, or at least, hominid most likely. People confuse cone heads with head boarding. Headboarding is sort of like Doug and Dave of the crop circles. LOL
c1zx 1 year ago
@c1zx i never said headboarding, i said manipulation when the skull is still soft. when the skull is soft you can pretty much make it into any shape you want, whether its a flat shape or an elongated shape. im pretty sure theres some tribes even today that elongate the baby skulls. so no, its not another hominid species or else we would have a classification for it. its just a manipulated homo sapien skull. also, they already tested the starchild skull back in 1999, its got normal human DNA.
ihmen 1 year ago
@ihmen Well that was sort of my point. We don't have a classification for it because #1) It's ignored by American scientists
#2) The earth is littered with impossible ruins of ancient civilizations that NO ONE talks about - these aren't classified either.
#3) My point was that no one will bother to classify evidence if it doesn't look like it will fit into the model they're working on, it's put on a shelf as a (unknown) or it's ignored.
#4) There are many bizarre skulls that aren't classified.
c1zx 1 year ago
@c1zx i said it doesnt have its own classification because its not another hominid species like you say. it is classified though as homo sapien because it is a homo sapien skull, its just deformed. and just because an individual is deformed that doesnt make that individual its own species. thats not how speciation works. star child is also classified as homo sapien because it is a deformed homo sapien skull. also why should we classify puma punku in evoluitionary theory when its not an organism?
ihmen 1 year ago
@ihmen The star child has already been PROVEN not to be a deformed homo sapien. Since it has been PROVEN to have DNA of possbile human mother but NO HUMAN FATHER - in fact, nothing matches it, that should spike your curiosity if you were a real scientist. FACT OF THE MATTER is, very few REAL scientists exist, they pander to the media, they pander to popular opinion. Check the facts - the data, I'm not interested in opinions. The star child has PROVEN to be extremely unusual, not a deformity.
c1zx 1 year ago
@c1zx you say its not human, then one sentence later you say it had a human mother... well the reason why they only found its mothers DNA in that test was because they tested for mitochondrial DNA. if you're aware of mitochondrial DNA, then you would know its passed down by the mother, so getting fathers DNA from mitochondrial DNA is impossible. however, in a chromosomal DNA test, they found it had normal X and Y chromosomes. so its parents were humans and its a human too, its just deformed.
ihmen 1 year ago
@ihmen Also you said that the star child is human. The DNA tests do not show that. The star child latest DNA results show two possibilities: The mother of the star child is human and the father is not human, and nothing can be found to match OR - The father and the mother were not human, nothing on earth can be found to match. At most, the star child only had a human mother, at least, both parents are non human. Those are the latest findings in DNA (2010).
c1zx 1 year ago
ahmadinejad is the missing link
JazistheGreatest 1 year ago
The skulls are either man or ape. No ape-man delusion. People today have various cranial volume skulls. Children have smaller cranial volumes. Don't be decieved. Your great, great grandpappy was not an ape.
jojojosmart 1 year ago
if god isn't real where do dead people go ._.
anonymoo23 1 year ago
dude i must say that is one of the most redicoulus things ive ever heard.
nighthawkjac 1 year ago
You are wrong.
The Earth is six thousand years old.
These false bones were put there by Satan,
to take our eyes off of the Lord.
The skulls are not real,
you have fallen into Satans trap!
You should pray that God will forgive you,
for making this video!
legion1a 1 year ago 7
@legion1a ??????
carllos25 1 year ago
@carllos25 That's a joke.
legion1a 1 year ago 2
@legion1a i agree but also if you want to know about the missing lix look to the beast people the tories and minder Roy link know one has a film about him on this format why becouse the devil look after it own,and the bones here are not compleat you know the truth since 1975 we have been here 6,000 years the romans di a census 2,000 year or so and simpel math show we had only a few people 6,00 years ago from an INHERITOR
inzen1909 1 year ago
@legion1a The Earth was made 6 billion years ago, not 6 thousand years ago. Whoever told you that was an idiot. I also cant see how this can be one of "Satan's traps", it's just a video. Where's your evidence to prove those bones are fake? Exactly, don't be making wild dumb accusations without even thinking first. Come on.
WNxDemelem 1 year ago