Added: 4 years ago
From: atputhan
Views: 418,819
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (1,715)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • We push forward this science to make a better wine when all that really matters is the cheese.

  • I believe the universe was made from red jelly.

  • Six billion dollars? We spend more than three times that on the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, annually. Imagine all the things we'd know and be able to do if humanity spent the resources we spend on war and religion, on the advancement of science and technology.

  • Among the European Country Germany isn't one of the supporter of LHC because it is against of what you call natural. People want to outwit God but it will never happen. Remember that!

  • @Aiceberries You are so wrong!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Where did you get that info? Look for member states. Major contributor and founding member of CERN. Do you really think that Germany with great scientific and technological ability would not be a member?

  • Comment removed

  • @Tupeutlatesla sweetheart I know this information because I live in Germany. You have to research first before pointing out your finger. Check out Wikipedia and clarify which part of Germany supports first and and for more info even major scientist in Germany doesn't support this idea. I'd discussed it with my 'studes' based on the German article we read. There was a point that they supported though later on back out because the majority aren't sold to this idea. 

  • Germany has problem on it's on and doesn't give a crap over rediscovering bigbang theory. Instead focus on providing job for its people.

  • Thanks for sharing, BBC.

  • The problem with the standard model is Mass, substance, "matter we can touch". But if we look closely isn't mass just another perception,? We perceive it has solidity and reify this abstract concept into reality. then we set about looking for a another perception to prove our already abstract perception.

  • Bunch of p.h.ds are making money by looking for nothing. and they say even if they found that they are wrong, it would be a big advantage. Yes they are correct is a big 6 figure salary in their pockets paid by poor.

  • Bilions of money on this... And still we Have money! Is problem of Sience that people are starving or dying? Or Sience is trying to help? Go give money and information to facebook, or google or aplle By themselfes having a profit compared to the entire US contry, why dont this "other" contry help!? U Y Still blame Sience?

    There is nothing of God here, It´s Just Man´s Law, Caesar.

  • The Universe is made of twelve particles of matter, four forces of nature.

  • What a waste of resources and time? we have enough problems already than trying to find that which all logic shows is impossible, u cant Rob of God His glory He is the creator , the woner and ruler of this universe, the big bang nonsense attempts to rob of us humans our dignity and worth, Science by its very nature is fluid, always shifting , but God remains at the centre , immutable , dependable and forever, amen and amen and amen

  • @ellyget No one is tying to steel God´s Glory, at least Sience has nothing to do whit it.If you want resouces,Sum all the money that vatican profits on theirs"simple and poor"priests on Church Tithing,and the profit that Aplle,facebook, google makes.there your going to find waste of resources.I have in my city a gigantic church,larger as a shopping, and besides a slum.What if all the material of the church goes to their houses?what is waste?God always change as human understanding of God changes

  • @ellyget by saying amen ur paying homage 2the god amun. also spelled amen the ancient egyptian god from where most christian beliefs are derived from. u think u know it all but u dont. u keep praying 2a make believe god whilst not looking anywhere else for knowledge. btw read the egyptian book of the dead 2 see where ur 10 commandments came from 1550 yrs b4 judaism. Isis had a son 2 the god amun imaculate conception) his name was ra, god in man form.. amun ra. sound familiar? btw u talk shit

  • the comet is coming, thank God the end is near, then we will see if your your collider knowledge will save you collider ass. ! billion people are starving to pay your worthless knowledge. Science is alway searching but never finding the truth.

  • damn keyboard warriors!! no-one cares about religion here!!

  • what piss's me off is the fact we can create a an exact replica of the big bang but we have not traveled to mars ....COME ON something there not tellling us?????/

  • @ttim6575t2000

    Mate would you like to know how goddamn far mars is...?

    A standard space shuttle would only make it 1/6th of the way there.

  • First I thought he would say "Thank you for downloading this documentary illegally." :D That would be the day. ^_^

  • well it didnt discover shit so they are building a bigger one in the usa.. big fucking deal..

  • @YooTubeCritc It's a bit soon to reach any conclusion. Keep flipping burgers.

  • @baalisgod666 Ill keep flipping your mum instead..

    .

    .

    .

    .

    Right bitch turn over

  • @baalisgod666 how about i flip your mum

  • explain to me what's the need of discovering that, besides the pleasure our greedy brain will take? Is it gonna make our life better ?our daily life of course, not the one your chattering mind is creating. (you know, that little voice in our head which brings fear and regrets). and know there are 2 kinds of ppl, the one who says: fk him this is my stuff and I like it, and the other one who ll say, can he be right? am I wasting my short life running after a bigger house etc.FEAR makes you want it

  • @popote35 Agree 100% Man tries to be God 

  • @draculauploader There is no god, so how can anyone be nothing?

  • @popote35 Your mentally challenged. "greedy minds"? Humans seek knowledge. One day we will have to leave this planet. Knowledge will get us to the stars. I hope your family tree withers here you moron.

  • thumbs up for the next build, "SUPER LARGE HARDON COLLIDER" :D

  • it will then blow us to thy kingdom come, the 2nd coming

  • For all you religious freaks out there, the god particle is actually called the Higgs Boson.

    This particle has absolutely nothing to do with god or allah or the aztec gods. The media only uses the 'god particle' name to get extra attention for a more general public. The origin of the name is from  Leon Lederman's book.

    It's called the 'god particle' in a metaphorical sense because the Higgs mechanism makes it possible to simplify the universe, resolving many different forces into one.

  • @Edge123455 But the Higgs is wrong, they will never find it cause it doesnt exist... just like god, the particle that never existed. Thats why is called the God particle LOL

  • @Typho0n86

    why do people like u over react when u hear the name God?

  • @JenMichel100 Cause it is a virus in people’s minds. It causes separation, intolerance and wars. There is no need for this imaginary being. I’m not the one that is over reacting, it’s the religious people that are, and I want it to stop!

  • @Typho0n86

    only islam is the virus in peoples mind..... nowadays christianity is a peaceful religion unlike islam ..... religion is not bad, its a matter of what religion we allow

  • @JenMichel100 If one religion is allowed then all should be allowed. There shouldnt be the need for religion. All lead to the same thing. Look at the westboro baptist church... Your telling me thats good? your just as foolish as the Islam's!

    PS i bet ur christian and have a closed view on this.

  • @JenMichel100 Christianity teaches that the world is only 6000 years old. It refutes scientific facts such as evolution. It teaches false beliefs. It says join us or burn in hell for eternity. I’m sorry I don’t want anyone to be a slave to this Stone Age philosophy.

  • @Typho0n86

    for sure u did not read the bible which suggest any clues that the earth is 6,000 years....... the bible is silent about this! and it does not suggest how old the earth and the universe all u know is what others say.... hey i suggest study more about the bible......... u dont know what ur saying about

  • @JenMichel100 Where did I say I got it from the bible? You’re making up shit, just like your religion does. I bet your parents were Christians and you were brainwashed into it. Why the fuck would i want to study the bible? its only fiction!! Take your closed brainwashed mind elsewhere.

    PS it’s; "you don't know what you’re talking about" compared to "u dont know what ur saying about" good Engrish mate ;D

  • @JenMichel100

    hey fool! u said that christianity teaches that the world is 6000 years old, the bible is the basis of the teachings of christianity,,,, u even deny that it came from the bible that the world is 6000 years old, and the bible do not teaches that the world is 6000 years old!

    if the bible is silent about the age of the earth, then christianity did not teach about its age!!!!

    got the logic their fool? i know u did not get it because ur mind is blinded by bias!!!!!!!

  • SandustanBrasov

    And yet, we can see, we can visualize the ethereal matter and the spiritual matter. The scheme to one device for to visualize the ethereal matter: EXIST! And this device it can realize!

    My e-mail: s.stan65@yahoo.com

    You Tube: sandustanBrasov’s Channel Dark energy is the ethereal energy and this can be harness it!

  • @sandustanBrasov I was following you for a while but then your english started to break up and I got lost. I agree on what you're saying. I think?

    Signed,

    Lost in translation

  • • SandustanBrasov

    The matter of the our terrestrial globe has four states of aggregation: solid, liquid, gseous and ethereal and not three after official science. The matter on which we see it, proceed from the ethereal matter, which from cancentration in concentration it had constituted in the electrons, in protons respectivel;y in the atoms of the chemical elements which had overtaken at the gaseous, liquid and solid state. All the matter on which we see it, is condensed ether.

  • • SandustanBrasov

    The PHYSICAL-CHEMICAL MATTER is the visible matter with free eye and is constituted from atoms of the chemical elements. The PHYSICAL-ETHEREAL MATTER is a matter with atoms more small with 7..8 order of dimension than the atoms of chemical elements, and the bodies formed from this matter are invisible for the human eye. The ETHEREAL PHYSICS it occupy with the study of the ethereal matters, but which was abandoned in the XX century, because in 1905 A.Einstein excludes the ether

  • • SandustanBrasov But the ETHER is a physical reality constituted from a very small matter, invisible for human eye, and is formed from atoms more small with 7...8 order of dimension than the atoms of the chemical elements. The matter of the ether penetrate in all the visible bodies and is the physical matter which fills both the interplanetary space and the interatomic space. The ether is a matter with mass and weigth, being subdued and she the action of the universal attraction law.

  • • SandustanBrasov

    Through the relativity theory to Einstein of over century, it hold with strenght -as a conspiracy a general activity of intellectual stultify of the planetary population. from relativity theory proceed the notion of: singularity, Big bang, black holes and holes of worm. From 1905 and till now in 2011, the disciples of the Einstein, preach with contumely as scientific elements of high class these theoretical confusions, these absurdities from which they had made a business.

  • • SandustanBrasov

    It popularize the fantastical theories and stantardized theories with which it terrorize the inhabitants the Earth, after what Einstein with relativity theory had blocked the science of the century XX. Sptephen Hawking and Roger Penrose had demonstrated in 1967 that the black holes proceed from the relativity theory.How it can conceive and it can say that the heart of the one black hole is a gravitational singularity whose volume tend to zero and whose mass tend to infinite?

  • • SandustanBrasov

    The notion of dark matter and dark energy proceed from theoretical physics, from relativity theory of the A. Einstein, from the mistaken interpretation of the physical reality. Something exist indeed: and matter and energy; but is the much ethereal matter and the her energys from the her frame. Dark energy and cosmic acceleration are a failure of relativity of the Einstein. Dark energy is the ethereal energy and this can be harness it!

  • • SandustanBrasov In 1905, A.Einstein conclude that the ether hasn't a correspondent in reality and constitute not a medium which let can serve as reference system. Thus Einstein renounced to the ether notion and absolute space and emits the two restricted relativity principles. By it content the second principle excludes the ether, impose as limit of bodies' movement - the light speed - and denatured completely the classic dynamics reality.

  • How big do you expect the boson to be ? Could it not simply expand through the walls of the collider ? Ie, the shock wave is at the boundary of the boson, perhaps.

  • @optionsnone figuratively speaking *

  • ...it's Santa

  • "he sees you when your sleeping, he knows when your awake!" = Santa Clause or God (since god is supposedly omniscient).

  • @vlatin1 Once we know that gravity bends and overpowers light then we can be certain that light does not escape the dense gravity in a black hole unless that black hole reaches a point of singularity where it dynamics break down reducing it from having the strength of a fresh black hole. I don't think this takes away from the black hole theory but adds to the research and development of it. The solution is to find a formula that doesn't break down on the quantum level. I'll get off my soap box

  • @vlatin1 My point was that in dealing with time-space,the instant "instinct" of attractor-magnetism is of a more evolved dynamic than the old "slow" gear and sprocket mechanical electrical memory that runs out of space.For the life of me I could never understand how computing from limited spaces of memory is emulated over basic instinct attractors when both are binary systems,just one is a beautiful fast Ferrari and the other a slow limping Gremlin.I can build a computer and take over the world.

  • Comment removed

  • @TINAliubov30 then what about abusive parents? i'm pretty sure that there are way more abusive parents out there that treat their OWN children in worse ways than some priests. i'm not some religious guy or whatever, it's just that i'm tired of seeing so many people bash on abusive priests (who are the minority) without considering the fact that there are many other groups of people who dish out more abuse to kids (i.e. parents, teachers, bullies etc....)

  • the bigest jump to the unknown... i hope it doesnt explode! lol

  • Comment removed

  • No black people within a 100 mile radius

  • @jimmyboy3664 SURPRISE JIMMY BOY I'M BLACK "A HEM" Alkebulan Jamaican African-American that created the interface formula for nano technology and my great grandfather was a white slave. Go figure..

  • Higgs boson was invented by Peter Higgs to explain why other particles exhibit mass. He starts by assuming the existence of a particle that only has mass and no other characteristics, such as charge. So the Higgs particle is like no other in our experience, since all normal matter is composed of electric charges that respond to electromagnetic influences.

  • @vlatin1 Magnetism will work but I think you have to let go of the electro. Electricity isn't even as fast as the speed of light therefore it would exist as mass and as mass it can be reduced by acceleration to nothing.

  • @princeadeshoga You cannot have magnetism without electricity. Only electric currents create magnetic fields.

  • Comment removed

  • Comment removed

  • @vlatin1 Right, you can't have the structure of magnetism without electricity, however I was only dealing with the non-electrical process of attractor-magnetism which can be used in symmetrical bar coding for example:

    (+) being II I II I and (-) being I II I II or (-) I II I II and (+) II I II I or II I I II and I II II I is instinctive attractor-magnetism processes without electrical memory concepts. These binary codes are very ancient about 10,053 years old and preserved in African religions.

  • Comment removed

  • Comment removed

  • We live in an Electric Universe, not a gravitational universe. Black Holes, gravity waves, dark matter, dark energy and all this other conjured up stuff do not exist. We need to stop wasting money searching for new particles and forces invented by mathematicians. A good measure of a theory is its ability to predict the outcome of new observations or explain them without introducing additional tailor-made concepts.

  • @vlatin1 Are you sure we live in an electric universe and gravity and black holes don't exist? Then how is that gravity bends light? As we know light traveling through gravity makes straight things seem curved and curved things seem straight because of gravity bending light. In the dense gravity of a black hole light can't escape. How do you account for these laws that are not tailor made assumptions or concepts?

  • @princeadeshoga Of course gravity exists. In the electric universe model, gravity is proposed to be an electrical property of matter, not a geometrical property of space. And, a black hole is a theoretical mathematical concept. There is no evidence for the existence of infinitely dense point masses. Jets of matter have been seen escaping the centre of black holes. This observation, falsifies black hole theories. Cosmologist’s came up with accretion discs to explain how this was possible.

  • Comment removed

  • @vlatin1 I see your point. Though the density of a black hole may in theory bend light into spinning circles preventing it from escaping, it would be logical to consider that since the black is in space that it also occupies space however empty until that space becomes too small and too tightly dense which seems to prove the promise of "Force = Mass x Acceleration". Would this not change the dynamics of the black hole causing it to have the need to breathe or start passing gas : )

  • @vlatin1 it's kind of that example: when a star implodes it has the risk to create a black hole because the mass becomes to dense(due to the compression exerced during the implosion), and its also why when that black hole is in fact created it prevents light from escaping giving us the illusion that the star is there (light takes time to travel to us) when in fact that star has died long ago

  • the answer is the ligth it self, because mass is deacelarated light E=m(cxc)

    so mass is M=e:c cause cxc passes to : because of the change in member and voids itself into a unique c, so if a certain amount of c can be put in contact with light itself it creates mass(matter)

  • @takitakair So your saying that matter comes from induced applications of light applied to itself? Then what happens to mass when a 16ft car traveling at half the speed of light is reduced to 8ft while light is not reduced at all much less its constant activity affected. If "X then Y" then how can your equation affect X area of mass and Y not be equally affected or not affected at all?

  • @princeadeshoga i'm saying if you particles traveling almost C(speed of light) the thing that you would expect is to create mass, cause when you colide at the speed C you create light and before it will be deacelerated to almost C returning to mass(matter) again, so this experience will help to understand light, example: it is what happens in the sun that matter(hidrogen) is acelerated to C creating light when it deacelarate it returns to his state of matter it's why the sun is enlarging...

  • @takitakair i was in youtube watching some videos now and encountered the confirmation of what I've said yearlier and here is the search topic"E=mc²: Einstein explains his famous formula "

  • @princeadeshoga next time be more clear in what you are asking cause i had the sensacion that you got the meaning of my comentary in the wrong way

    

  • I never got this, but if we can't even look at particles (like protons and neutrons) like, see what they actually are, which is why we have theorys like wave-particle duality, how are we suppose to see the effects of this experiment if something does happen? let alone measure it

  • @casenova0

    Our senses are limited which forces us to use other means by which to detect things, quite often we must rely on indirect evidence. When you have indirect evidence each supporting each other, and a concordance follows (where different methods yeild the same result), that consistency can build solid foundations for a theory.

  • @casenova0 In the video it says the particles will be magnetically separated so you can study them. Plus I think the 2005 discovery of the nano interface formula gave them all the answers they need to the point of not even needing a hadron collider. Their right, the science of wasting tax money is what you do when you don't know what youre doing..

  • @princeadeshoga well....least we got an internet out of it ^^;

  • if the universe exploded from practicly nothing, then won't what these scientists are trying to do, explode into billions of galaxies blowing us all out of existence?

    How can anyone that claims to know the infinite size of the universe with its countless galaxies and stars larger than our own sun believe it come from nothing?

  • @hrspwr69fstbck What physicists refer to as "nothing" is not the same "nothing" that everyday people refer to. I have a box with "nothing" in it, and most people will agree with me, but this is not the same as saying there's ABSOLUTELY NOTHING in it :D

  • This experiment will accidently kill us.You do not know what dark matter is.How do you know you are not affecting it?

  • @Senariusa Hmmm....ever heard of the Crusades?

  • @DerangederX

    You do realise you just basically done what you said the other person was doing EXACTLY lol

  • @DerangederX It wasn't just a discussion, it was more like a battle of pride. Just because you don't agree with someone doesn't mean you have to insult them. That just makes you an arrogant prick. I posted because people like you, who troll youtube comments because they have nothing better to do tend to annoy me. Who are you to tell me what my actions are based on? This will be my last comment. Go ahead and display your ignorance by replying with a "witty" comeback so I can prove my point.

  • @DerangederX Hey, assholes....Neither of you is accomplishing anything by arguing about petty differences. You have both proved that you are inferior human beings by refusing to accept others' opinions and being too thick-headed to humble yourself and let it go. This argument is over. You both lose.

  • @DerangederX If you would take the time to read my first comment posted here you will know that I have always said the same. It is egotrippin.

  • @Fapsamup how is it ego tripping to discover knowledge fuckwit? Oh yes that's right, your pretend god sees it as a sin to have knowledge. Go wander around in a desert.

  • @baalisgod666 That is the most ridiculous reply I ever received on youtube.

  • @DerangederX I don't hate science, I hate egocentrical science. And the LHC is a Six Billion Dollar Egocentrical Experiment.

  • @DerangederX Well, I am on my way to reduce the use of science and diminish the negative impact we humans have on earth. And I have no anger in me like you do.

  • @DerangederX You are insensitive and are driven by your ego. We don't neet to understand the universe to live better on earth. Everithing was alright before science ruined it all. Remember Hyroshima and Nagasaki? Thank you science!

  • 6 Billion for ego tripping and knowledge we probably will never truely be able to understand or apply to our daily lives. Think about how many children who are dying of hunger and country's we could have saved with that amount of money.

  • i think to talk about god is more than inappropriate

  • @gunananda And your particular God is who, exactly?

  • @gunananda why, god is as real an an intelligent american, or unicorns : Non existent.

  • Celebrate the end of the wotld lol

  • TimeTravel ? AntiMatter? DANGERfuckinOUS...

  • LHC = Laughing Hateful C*nts.

    America and Britain alone are in debt over $15 trillion, probably to the f*ck*rs who fund this (defo' those who want a world bank). They the type of person that wants to live forever, keep secrets to live better than the majority and know all about all. One day they'll bring about the death of our home - planet/mother Earth. FIGHT THE NWO, did you vote for Globalism?? It's a comin and it's a Global Tieranny. PEACE rant over :)

  • If the Hadron Collider's formula's from this math lacking the analog language of its universe, it may prove catastrophic for the galaxy.

  • Nano scale Mass = Distance x Time

  • DID that shit ever work ? or was that a waste of our fuckin tax money ?

  • @lilthomasking3 ur tax money didnt pay for it.. it was privately funded.

  • everything looks cooler through a mutha fucking fish eye lense 1:10

  • Why do atoms have mass? Maybe because sub atomic particles have Kinetic energy and kinetic energy has mass. I'd guess that even if protons, neutrons and electrons are made up of much smaller particles held in orbital-like energy fields, and then again those particles are made up of largely nothing, but further energy fields, ad infinitum, then the mass of the subatomic particles would be close to zero grammes, but not quite, so we have (some) mass multiplied by kinetic energy.

  • @scottwadeg The question is what is "X" if "Y" exist because of "X". X is an Energy Interface. The atomic universe sits on the string universe both are interfaced. Vibrating strings tie atoms together.

  • What they aren't saying is very scary. What is being called a spooky model is the fact that dividing by smaller and smaller numbers results in larger numbers until you have to divide by zero where the model breaks down. They had no knowledge or regard to whether or not they would divide a particle by zero. The rightfully called "sick hole" that breaks down the model and makes it spooky could open a black hole that vaporizes the galaxy.

  • What the aren't telling is very scary. What is being called spooky model is the fact that dividing by smaller numbers and smaller results in larger numbers. When the dividing numbers are reduced to zero the equation breaks down. They had no knowledge or regard to whether or not they would divide a particle by zero. The rightfully called "sick hole" that breaks down the model and makes it spooky could open a black hole that vaporizes the galaxy.

  • this is a waste of money. I mean...even if they manage to recreate that moment, it still remains a question: " you spent 6 billion dollars to do this, but who did it the first time ? and how ? " you dont get an answer. You just understand that there must be a higher and more intelligent form of life...and that is God.

  • @tpaul001 they are just trying make the people believe that is their goal...LHC can be use as a weapon ^_^

  • @luwiz Uh...No. It can't. A Particle accelerator itself can be used as a weapon, but to do that with the LHC would be quite blutly ineffective and stupid.

  • @luwiz The LHC CANNOT be used as a weapon; you can't take the damn thing anywhere. They can't aim it at anything. That is not its intent.

    Also, the LHC does not work when they initially powered it on. All humongous systems never work right out of the box when 1st switched on. They'll be at it 2 decades before it's useful for something.

  • @luwiz Explain how such a huge particle accelerator can be used as a weapon. The particles don't even come out of the machine.

  • @tpaul001

    Yeah "magic" bronze-age books written by camel herders have so much more relevance. It's not as if science has ever done anything useful for humanity now is it?

  • @ninjamaritz I allready sad that science is good and brought many useful "things" to humanity, but that is not what I was talking about.

  • @tpaul001 There is no proof of God's existence. As sure as I am that you believe in a God, I'm sure you would not get an answer if you asked him how the universe started. Science has brought you more understand, better health care, and great technology (including the computer you're using), than belief in God could ever. We'd still be in the dark ages.

    The machine will deepen our understanding of the universe and how it works. The money is well worth it.

  • @UnderManiac you are right about human achievements, and I agree that we need to find tehnologies that can make our life better. But when you look around and see the complexity of the nature, the beauty of everything we are sourounded, do you really think it's by "mistake" ? Have you ever seen a "benefic explosion"? From something soo distructive a perfect solar system was created, and amazingly also has a planet with perfect condition for life ? Do you really belive this ?

  • @tpaul001 First of all, the planets did not immediately come into existence after the big bang. There was hydrogen and maybe helium (maybe shortly after). These began to fuse into heavier elements as well, but over millions of years, or even billions. As gravity pulled together the elements they turned into stars, which in turn blew up throwing even heavier elements out there. The cycle continued. Planets, moons, suns, etc, came out of it all. God was not needed.

  • @tpaul001 Are you saying you don't believe there can be no life elsewhere in the universe?  You have a planet in the habitable zone around a sun (Our habitable zone is 211, 474, 461.54 miles in diameter - earth diameter 7926 miles). Lots of room to play with, doesn't have to be placed exactly. Life is more tenacious than you think. It's not a fragile system. Evolution works. Viva evolution

  • @UnderManiac I agree agree that there may be life on some other planets, but I do not agree with you when you say there is no need of God to this. I respect you're beliefs but I can't accept them. Have you ever thought that God may exist ? Do you really beliefe that all around us comes from....luck ? Beacause you must admit that this is pure luck :)

  • @tpaul001 there is no god you silly twat

  • @CBCOlympics.....if you say so....

  • @tpaul001 I was raised to believe in God and the whole lot. I have learned that God does not exist. There is no need to believe in God, for me. You can if you wish. Luck has nothing to do with life. It would seem that life is tenacious enough to begin without a God. Who knows for sure, maybe a primitive life form was carried here on a comet or something. There is too much that nature does that is attributed to God, but has been proven that it's the biology of nature itself.

  • @UnderManiac

    All things simply begin from god's will, god says "Be" and it is...without his will, there is no life.

    example: Jesus Christ, son of Mary.(pbut)

  • @GreyWolf1904 That is the simple answer, isn't it? No need to question anything when God is the answer to everything. I have given up the notion that there is a God. From what I see in the world around me, it doesn't seem like God cares anymore. Religion has spurred many wars, and continues to this day.

    I've become atheist due to the bible and religion. The world makes more sense now. It's much more beautiful this way. Nature is fascinating.

  • @UnderManiac

    Is keeping faith in a world gone bad simple? I don't think so. I would feel giving up the notion that there is no god is the simpler solution.

    but at what cost?

    I agree that religion has been used to spur many wars, but don't you agree man is the perpetrators of war? not religion itself.

    Nature is fascinating indeed, all the more reason to believe in a grand architect. The idea of this being random chance is complete speculation with un-proven theory.

  • @GreyWolf1904 Greed has been the perpetrator of many wars. Religion's just been used as the excuse.

  • @wingituk

    I agree...

    Greed is the knife, and the scares run deep.

  • @GreyWolf1904 No proof of that ever happening, but whatever.

  • @UnderManiac I agree that our brain is not able to understand the amazing world that surrounds us. I enjoyed our conversation, but I can see that you are pretty conviced that God does not exist, and I am sure that He exists. Who's wright? We'll see when we die. But when that happens one of us will be very shocked, and unfortunately that day we wont be able to turn back time to change anything. Sincerely yours, Paul

  • @tpaul001 I look forward to the day when people stop referring to 'God' as a 'He'. It just shows ignorance that some 'supreme deity' should have male genitalia (for what exactly?) and just how archaic/backwoodsman this sounds.

    Get outside your 'conditioning box' and learn more.

  • @wingituk Maybe I did

  • @wingituk The problem is that when we use the term "It", it refers to inferior beeings than human beeings since humans like to call themselves the most advance species in the universe. The only one above man is God and calling it "It" is disgraceful. God is the Father, search it in any religion that speaks about a God, God is always refered to as the Father. That is why we refere to God as "He".

  • @wingituk Didn't Jesus call "it" Father in Heaven? He'd know, You don't so STFU cunt.

  • @baalisgod666 Who's Jesus?

  • All this data is flawed, since no one seems to notice we are in a black hole! That is what the swastika was, that is what caused the dark ages, that is the Pit, the Abyss...the expanding universe is just an illusion! That is what we are potentially 'saved' from, the 'abyss'. Damn, you are all sooooooo asleep! Please, please wake up!!!

  • @2012listo Hmmm, nice bit of fiction. You should write for the Isaac Asimov's science fiction magazine.

  • yay - highest rated comments on yet another science vid are religion/antireligion accusations. I'm over it.

    Not exactly love or tolerance. Im personally atheist, and as anti religious fundamentalism as the best of them, but I have to go out on a limb here, and acknowledge the anti religious extremism so prevalent on YT. Nothing galvanises people to a cause (religious or anti) and excites, quite like fundamentalism.

    To stop the comments, I'll say: now cue the opinions. ;)

  • if they go and shoot God particle in the eye with that spinny thing i hope they got plenty salt to be chucking over they shoulder

  • the old dude has some top-notch screensavers!

  • Well? did they turn it on? ....

  • @calvinthedestroyer yes. They're currently running it at half power, gathering data for about 1 year before shutting down and preparing for full-power operation in another couple of years. The reason they're running it for 1 year straight right now is so that they have something to analyze while they wait. The entire data analysis process is largely statistical, and it's therefore necessary to gather ridiculous amounts of data, i.e. running the experiment continuously for at least 1 year.

  • lots of fancy graphics...distracts from teh facts

  • m jealous...i wanna work there....

  • @senariusa I'm guessing your a Christian :)

  • Oddly enough Senariusa private messaged me and told me he/she has proof of a gods existance but he/she wouldn't bother showing to me because I wouldn't believe it even with my own eyes. Which by the way is exactly the response I expected and the only one which these folks evergive. So hit us with the secret evidence already quite hiding it away from those you deem unworthy. Science makes all their evidence readily available so it can be tested and reproduced independantly.

  • Senariusa -  "All I see from your message is sarcasm, NOT willingness to find god, If you wanted than you would have already done it. So thats why Im ignoring you" There is no sarcasm implied. You are right in that I have no willingness to find a god. I also have no willingness to find aliens or bigfoot. It is up to the claiment to provide the proof that such things exist. I should also add that you messaged me and not the other way around. If you are ignoring me then why reply?

  • Wowowowowowow Hold up....

    How could the "Big Bang" be created out of nothing if there was nothing in the universe at the time even the universe didn't exist nothing was there so what created the big bang? NOTHING. God created the universe not some myth of the "Big Bang". For something to be created you need a creator (God) and the creator has to be eternal so that means nothing created God he was always there and always will be.

    People never learn untill they go to far and can't undo it.

  • @adzii1 you are kidding, right? "God was always there and always will be" Maybe the unvierse itself was always there and always will be? Believe me, Gods are creations of the great imagination from mankind.

  • @adzii1 As complex as the universe is if there were a god who created it then it must be more complex than the universe, which begs the question - who created god? This god creature didn't create itself and it couldn't have come from nothing as you have pointed out. So it looks like your belief shares the same problem that you impose on the big bang.