Why do people laugh at creationists 1

[keith7357]

I really do not know what this video is about. If any1 would like to make a case against creation it should be on scientific evidence that the galaxy is not created. not debuting some random people.

One should be open to all possibilities, the possibility of the big bang and evaluation and also the possibility of the galaxy being created. if humans with our current intellect are capable of creating virtual worlds why is it so hard to believe that we similarly are in one.

[Gpaints]

@keith7357 This video is about showing how stupid the creationists arguments are when they try to prove there religion.

[jw197able]

There was a global flood! , some things are a fact whether people want to believe it or not. The entire earth is a testimony to the floord- deserts, underwater cities, oil & coal underground, hundreds of flood stories, mountains, level of the oceans, human population, we cant excape the evidence.

but all we need is Gods word.

[ndrthrdr1]

@jw197able There was no global flood. Geologists know this and laugh at laymen like you who cling to your mythical nonsense and who ignore both the evidence and the experts.

[blazereef]

did he actually say that our planet orbits in a sphere? theres not way he is this stupid, he has to be trolling

[drche420]

NASA has announced they have already found a shit ton of water on the moon, and they've found water on mars. Not speculation, they ACTUALLY FOUND water. Look it up

[whiteraider]

religious people are all retards

[Blitzaking]

@whiteraider You shouldn't generalize like that.

[whiteraider]

@Blitzaking the truth can be hard huh.

[0121ryanh117]

VenomFangX sucks

[amorphousguy]

Never underestimate the stupidity of creationists, especially when they try to gain control over school science curriculums and politics. Perfect examples are Palin and the dynamic wack-job duo: Ray Comfort and Kirk Cameron.

[Ilikejpgs]

Awesom vid thunderf00t. I knew that VFX was an idiot when I saw his vids but now you have let me know that he is an even bigger idiot that I ever thought possible.

[porkchopsandwiches1]

Thank you so much thunderf00t, for giving me the biggest laugh I've had in a while.  Your videos rock, and say exactly why I laugh at creationists ^_^

[NightmareRavens]

supposed early descendent of Adam and Eve. I don't want to hear your futile rational for slavery as the luminous evidence of the shifting Zeitgeist is enough to explain it without ever resorting to divine intervention.

[NightmareRavens]

what we are. It is contemptible, yet not surprising, that you cherry picked the argument of the malevolent nature of the Christian god, contrary to popular belief, of slavery when I clearly emphasized elsewhere- on extreme, vindictive punishment for marginal crimes. Again the shifting moral Zeitgeist is reflected through the changing text. If god is omniscient then he would of recognize the fallacies of slavery as it began to sprung about. In the light of this, slavery was encouraged amongst the

[NightmareRavens]

are burning in hell right now. And finally, please continue living in your little bubble of fairy dust and a superstition but while you're at it, stop being a hypocrite and throw out every piece of technology in your home that had made your life so enjoyable as they were mostly invented by non-believers- Pantheists, if you will. Best of luck on your plumbing career.

[mandlreed]

how am I being a hypocrite? How is adherence to scientific laws superstition? If you are so worried about your people going to hell, why don't you tell them about the gospel of Christ. It's the only way to save them.

[mandlreed]

great video, very fair to show the stupid statement made by some creationists. You want to see non-creationist look stupid? Let's ask them how life came about.

[NightmareRavens]

Ergh, I'm aware that you mentioned you made note that Thunderf00t made this video, but how dare you use Thunderf00t's video, without adding anything into it, and steal viewers from him. You would really not have a clear sense of morals to do something like this.

[TornadoCreator]

Thunderf00t has been suspended, these are re-uploads. If you check the playlist he made, originally he simply linked to the originals...

[NightmareRavens]

Oh christ, how?!

[TornadoCreator]

False DMCA's, it's been resolved now due to a mirrored video protest and he's been reinstated today in fact.

Thunderf00t is very giving with his videos though and has waved copyright on them. He encourages people mirroring them as he is often the target of false DMCA's and would prefer his videos where not lost forever because of some spiteful people.

I agree perhaps a link to thunderf00ts channel in the description should have been included but I don't think the video was stolen with malice.

[TornadoCreator]

Actually... if you check. A link to thunderf00t's reinstated channel has been added to the videos description box now.

[NightmareRavens]

Lol, ironically, it is thanks to the creationists that my atheistic beliefs are enhanced and all my rational admiration for spirituality is put in the dark.

[mandlreed]

so nightmare, as an atheist, how do you account for the orgin of life?

[NightmareRavens]

There is not yet a theory accountable for the origin of life; However, I'd like to see you explain the origin of life without resorting to the definitively futile and unintelligent explanation of biblical scriptures.

[mandlreed]

hey nightmare why don't you tell me how a computer came about without using human intervention.

[NightmareRavens]

That relates to this topic how? This is such an old chestnut, and you creationists just seem to find no shame in repeating it over and over. Just because an anvil is made by a blacksmith doesn't mean life is created by god. The blacksmith making the anvil is a known conception much like the art is made by an artist. There are evidence to back it up. However, there are absolutely no evidence to backup intelligent design, only speculative garbage. The two subjects- creation of life and creation

[mandlreed]

instead of mocking what I said, why don't you just answer the question. I know why, it will only show your ignorance. You have no way of providing a logical, coherent, and scientific way of explaining the orgin of life.

[NightmareRavens]

of the anvil, or computer, are two completely irrelevent topics. Also, if god is accountable for the creation of life, then tell me, what created god, and what created the god who created god and so on towards an infinite regression which is equivelent to restating the question if one says god did it. Looking forward to your response, sincerely..

[mandlreed]

Who created God? Your question is in error. Your question provides a false assumption. You're assuming that God had to be created. God is eternal, he has no beginning and no ending. Therefore, nobody created God. So far this is the only question answered. I answer one you answered none.

[NightmareRavens]

Saying god created everything answers nothing, you are making speculations, bad ones at that, that are not backed up by anything but your fantasies. The answer that you've provided is not logical, not coherent and has no scientific merit. The reason I didn't answer it is because it is still unknown to humanity and that's no reason to fill that gap with god and it is ludicrous to try to answer something you don't know because it demonstrates a certain, rather unappreciated, arrogance.

[mandlreed]

how do you know that my speculations are bad? Saying God created everything answer everything it is only your ignorance that's the problem. Saying that there's a God shows no arrogance. It is you who want to say God doesn't exist who's arrogant.

[NightmareRavens]

It is ridiculous to assume, again you assume, and a bad assumption at that, that if a speculation explains a certain mystery it must be true. AGAIN, you demonstrate the common intellectual counter-productivity a belief in god potentially is. With that terrible logic, I could make a safe conclusion that the sun god created the sun and a different moon god created the moon and every single item is created by a different god. Believing in a god without any EVIDENCE, again, key word here, EVIDENCE

[NightmareRavens]

Thinking that your argument can be on a even footing on someone who had dedicated their entire life in tedious research and experiments is, definitively, arrogant. And again, YOU ARE ASSUMING, that I want to undermine a god that is associated with any religion, it is the absence of the evidence for his existence, logic and rational thinking that prevented me from steering onto a path of blind faith.

[NightmareRavens]

Again, if god is a creator then who are you to say that he isn't created by his creator, and his creator. Who are you to say your assumption is correct? You've stated nothing worthy of review or discussion in the scientific community.

[NightmareRavens]

As superficial as this argument-the argument of assuming god requires a creator- is, I will go on by entertaining it. Please note that I am using your logic of having a creator criterium prerequisite for life to be created to assume that god himself was created. There is no empirical observation for the creation of life by a creator and finally and most importantly, there is no evidence to sustain such claims. Also, alternatively to having a creator I can also make speculations such as molecules

[NightmareRavens]

and atoms- the empirical biological components of life- are governed by, natural, laws of chemistry and physics- and not random chance. Evolution takes it from there, and through millennia of natural selection, single-celled organisms- like the amoeba- develop traits to better adapt to their environment- non of which involves god or consists of any evidence of the intervention of an anthropomorphic divine deity.

[mandlreed]

amoeba developing traits to better adapt to their environment is an example of micro-evolution. These amoeba do not become hamsters, cow, dogs, etc. They stay amoeba. By faith, you are welcome to believe that the turn into those animals but this has never been observed.

[NightmareRavens]

First of all, if you've passed simple high-school biology, you would understand that the only difference between micro-evolution and macro-evolution is time-scale. It is simply absurd to assume that after a long period of time micro-evolution is the only change to the evolved organism. Aside from the obvious macro-evolution, mutations also play a large part of evolution-which accounts for much of the diversity we see today.

[mandlreed]

if you actually understood science we have never observed animals changing into completely different animals. In order to perform that change there has to be new information produced in the genome. Still, every animal has produced after its own kind, always has occured, there has been NO EXCEPTION to the rule. As mentioned in the Bible

[NightmareRavens]

First of all, one must question the kind of observation that you desire. The fossilized evidence is of abundance. Also the evidence from anatomy, and genetics is enough to prove evolution. By the way, if you want an example for evolution that has been observed you can read up on the different conditioning of penicillin-resistant bacteria colonies. Which, if you do understand science, then you would know that a change in genetic information is changed due to mutation. Second of all, nobody is

[mandlreed]

let's see nightmare after spouting off that there's so much evidence After being inundated with remarks resembling, if you actually understood science, and there's evidence in the fossil record or from biology without providing one example. I have news here he has given me one so called example--the penicillin-resistant bacteria colonies. Excuse me, they are STILL bacteria, right? They haven't changed into anything like a hamster, dolphin, or rose bush? How is this evolution?

[NightmareRavens]

trying to argue that animals are produced after its own kind, after-all, all the organisms on the planet are related and stemmed possibly from single-celled amoebas. Malevolent sarcasms aside, as you've not yet posed a palatable threat to evolution, from the fossil records, we know that modern day humans were ape-like men millions of years ago-which doesn't require a change in genetic information because we're of the same species. Natural selection and evolution coerced our species into becoming

[chestbuster1987]

Stupidest comment ever. You clearly have no understanding of biology or are completely blind to reality.

[NightmareRavens]

Also, to return to the subject of evolution, the fossil record for the slowly evolving species is abundance. That is not faith, but fact- backed up by solid evidence. If you wish to be so critical as to trying to denounce evolution even though there are so much evidence and had been approved by countless peer review- characteristics of productive thinking that had enabled all the convenient technology exemplified by the piece of technology you are looking at- you should be that critical to your

[NightmareRavens]

religion. The holy books all contradict itself, and encourage slavery and extreme forms of punishment for marginal crimes-such as stoning of disobedient children and those who work on sundays. If you choose to cherry pick the ones accepted by the current moral zeitgeist then that doesn't make you a true Christian, and don't even try to argue that these are not supposed to be taken literally(how in hell can you take something like that figuratively). and if you obey them and go against the

[mandlreed]

The Bible doesn't contradict itself. If you notice in Philemon 16, Paul calls on a slaveholder to accept his escaped slave Onesimus as someone above a servant. This helped to erradicate a change in the Roman empire regarding slaves. Regarding those marginal crime you have to look at context. God was forming a theocracy and under this theocracy there were rules. Which the Israelites agreed to, we aren't under these rules. We're not a theocratic government.

[rddaos]

the bible is arguably the most idiotic and self-contradicting book ever published in mankind's history

[Spitamenes]

@rddaos Fully agreed! And guess what: all books that were inspired by the Bible, such as the Koran (in fact, the word "qur'an" is Aramaic and is derived from Christian-Aramaic hymn books), are just as dumb and idiotic. So we should not expect too much from people who believe in that crap.

[Doum92]

Hahahaha

You use 1 example (a bad one) to explain that the ENTIRE BIBLE isn't contradictory. Typical Christian. People like you make the humanity look retard. It's people like you that stop the progress of any technology. PEOPLE LIKE YOU WHO DONT DO ANY FUCKING THING TO HELP THE HUMANITY. PEOPLE LIKE YOU WHO FUCK EVERYONE WITH THEIR FUCKING NONEXISTENT MAGIC-BEARD GOD.

U just pathetic. You should learn to think by yourself.

[NightmareRavens]

current moral zeitgeist then it makes you a malevolent, and anti-social extremist- yet that is what the bible encourages you to be. What kind of god makes rules that is only valid for a short glimpse of time and in a small part of the world when it was at its prime. Which brings me to my next point-the Christian god is a racist god. The orientals of the east was "ignored" by the Christian god until only recently thus, if the Christian doctrine is true, millions of my ancestors

[mandlreed]

The oriental of the east weren't ignored by God. God's message of salvation is for all, including the Asians.

[NightmareRavens]

Looking forward to your response.

[zikzell]

wow... u got vote botted

[canaanav]

Great video. I love those Hovind graphics that he uses. Chrsitians love to make complete bullshit look technical.

[909540]

this vid was votebotted no doubt

[Pellett29]

Its not the creationism that kills him, its his knowledge of space. Him not knowing basic facts of the universe doesn't mean creationists are idiots.

[Nerusai]

No, but his lack of knowledge probably comes from his 'creationism', preventing the search for dissenting information and trying to frame everything into the current frame of knowledge.

It's simple logic that given a set A (creationists) and a sub-item of this set b (this kid), then all traits from b do not logically convey onto the entire set A. If we correlate multiple sub-items from A, we do seem that they do in fact strongly correlate.

Lets call creationism a moderator-variable, mkay?

[AtheistxNinja]

I know you wrote this awhile ago, but I love the explanation!

[rastarigate]

wow....this was funny

[soccergal1a2]

Hahaha

Please keep making videos. LOVE IT :)!

[thegypsy17]

As a person who is darned sick of the little Jesus kids jumping up in the middle of a college biology lecture to SCREAM at the professor that he's wrong and that the bible told them so...thank you :)

Nice vids. Keep telling the truth.

[ampiet3]

Oh my god I know what you are talking about. I hate that too.

[ampiet3]

He is speaking English you idiot. FAIL IN LIFE!

[arsenelupin123]

The fact that there is liquid water tends to get our attention because we are living and this is important to us.

It is special only because we decide it's special. We indeed have a natural bias regarding things that involve our survival and existence, but by no means these conditions must be regarded improbable. They are in fact prior to our existence, and thus determine what we give importance too.

These creationists should stop to center the world around them.

[NoSz4]

amazing series.

[acaciacat]

Im new here but I will say this for now. The creator of this video seems to be very arrogant, and uses what I learned in high school was called "ad hominem" which means to attack the person. There may be some stuff of substance in certain arguments, but as an observer they are greatly diminished by the prevelance of ad hominems.

[tsferg]

What examples of ad hominems in this video can you give? He makes fun of the guy, continuously, but when he attacks creationist videos he uses examples and explains them...

[ajc06]

acaciacat, then you must not have been paying very good attention that day in high school. An insult is not in and of itself an ad hominem attack. There has to be an implication that the insult disproves the target's claims. Calling someone who's stubbornly ignorant a moron is not an ad hominem attack, it's just an insult.

However, saying a person's arguments are diminished because he "seems arrogant" IS an ad hominem attack. (Did you learn about irony in high school?)

[jamesz2]

thunderf00t is 'arrogant' for talking about simple science?!? I'd argue that it's *more* arrogant to spread misinformation and ignorance.  So basically if someone said that 1+1=0 and I I told you that 1+1=2 you would consider that to be an "ad hominem" attack?

[majorvoltage]

I wish VenomFangX would get an education so he could understand how hard he's getting owned by Thunderf00t.

He'd probably suicide.

[nuttymadam3575]

thank you so much for this, i have been trying to convince this asshole that he is deluded for months and he just quotes bible to me, calling me a sinner, dipshit. you rock.