Comment removed
stanchow1980 8 months ago
taxi driver lose. good.
robertlam18 1 year ago
點解唔係公眾地方打架一起拉同坐白車去醫院既??????
polly550hk 2 years ago
的士司机通常抵打,車費比少唔得,比多找少.
anthonychan60 2 years ago
差佬叫佢咁做架啦= =
W1313iY 2 years ago
咁有你有冇比條片比差人ar ?
oiyan0114 2 years ago
yep. those four guys are cops. one of them showed his badge to the passenger.
jimfee42 2 years ago
ON9仔
siuhotszyuen 2 years ago 7
that 4 ppls must be CID.
chilly228 3 years ago
Plainclothes cops are not necessarily detectives, they could be uniform cops on plainclothes duties.
But these four men in civilian clothing which appeared later here seemed to be policemen.
brucelee1977 3 years ago
個四條友係咩人?
wongtszhin 3 years ago
plain clothes police
b3108 3 years ago
@wongtszhin
應該係便衣警察
manwah2006 2 years ago
"的士上有差人,但司機公然違反交通條例,罔顧他人安全在雙白線掉頭. " <-- 有咩咁出奇呢? 應該係警察指示佢咁做吧.
pourMoneyIntoSea 3 years ago 19
Comment removed
stanchow1980 8 months ago
taxi driver lose. good.
robertlam18 1 year ago
點解唔係公眾地方打架一起拉同坐白車去醫院既??????
polly550hk 2 years ago
的士司机通常抵打,車費比少唔得,比多找少.
anthonychan60 2 years ago
差佬叫佢咁做架啦= =
W1313iY 2 years ago
咁有你有冇比條片比差人ar ?
oiyan0114 2 years ago
yep. those four guys are cops. one of them showed his badge to the passenger.
jimfee42 2 years ago
ON9仔
siuhotszyuen 2 years ago 7
that 4 ppls must be CID.
chilly228 3 years ago
Plainclothes cops are not necessarily detectives, they could be uniform cops on plainclothes duties.
But these four men in civilian clothing which appeared later here seemed to be policemen.
brucelee1977 3 years ago
個四條友係咩人?
wongtszhin 3 years ago
plain clothes police
b3108 3 years ago
@wongtszhin
應該係便衣警察
manwah2006 2 years ago
"的士上有差人,但司機公然違反交通條例,罔顧他人安全在雙白線掉頭. " <-- 有咩咁出奇呢? 應該係警察指示佢咁做吧.
pourMoneyIntoSea 3 years ago 19