Hey every1, just foud a great website with huge file collection (PC And MAC) Just google For Aries-Films and u will find it. You can also watch youtube video in my channel and see how many great programs they got
Ahead of "everyone"? The Commodore Pet out sold Apple, then Microsoft came around and sealed the coffin and Apple has been struggling to keep 10% market share ever since. I don't know about you, but every corporation defines its success by how much it makes - even Apple. Their MP3 players are what saved them and a lot of the R&D seed money came from Microsoft in the form of 150 Million dollars worth of non-voting shares. So next time you listen to your ipod, give MS the respect it deserves.
@jwd0808 The PET? Do you mean the Vic-20? The Apple 2 was a massive seller, outsold the PET and the TRS-80 in the end. the Lisa v Mac civil war helped big blue gain dominance. Commodore are not a company I would put forward as an example of a great business model, or an example of how to dominate market share. They were ruined by one product (the a600) which neither MS or Apple have managed, despite MS bob, and all the macs from 86-98 :P And MS was forced to buy the shares in a patent dispute.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
everyone has an ipod?
no, just the loud annoying hipsters that stand out.
in reality a little over 200 million ipods have sold, however, there are 300+ million people in the US, 1+ billion in China, and countless others elsewhere totalling 6 billion.
and this doesn't count those who have over the years upgraded and kept their old ipods in a drawer somewhere.
and i've seen people with zunes. my grandpa even has one!
bill always maintains his position. i believe he is right and it's just business, it's not a relationship it's steves desire to personalize his business so he can use guilt as a form of control. just my opinion.
And yes, every Mac Office edition has been better than its Windows equivalent. Even the version numbers proves it. Mac 98 after 97, ver. X (released 2001) after 2000, office:mac (2004) after 2003, and now 2008 after 2007!
Once more I'll repharse what I meant... the next Mac version after the Windows one is like an improved version of the former. The repeating patterns, such as the Mac version being released a year after, with similar features to the last, etc.
Correction:
Office 98 after 97, 2001 after 2000, ver. X (2002) after XP (2001), office:mac (2004) after 2003, and now 2008 after Office 2007.
as far as I know, Apple made an arrangement with Xerox to publish the GUI technology, because they were not interested on it.
Microsoft STOLE the whole idea from the Mac prototypes. Why do you guys qualify my comments as negative? That was extensively DOCUMENTED, and there were a long trial about that.
@elcaifo your comments are negative becuase you state a known lie, Xerox didn't gibe apple anything, which is why XEROX SUED APPLE FOR STEALING THEIR GUI
@johnmonk66 Wrong, Xerox tried to sue Apple for stealing it, but because they had BOUGHT it, they couldn't. Contrast this with something like Windows where rather than BUYING the gui, MS developers STOLE the design.
@pathammond LIAR, apple never bought anything of xerox, xerox lost the case because time ran out, unlike apple lost its case because they were wrong. go suck steve jobs dick, you are such a fucking slave
@johnmonk66 I think you need to calm down. Xerox ran out of time because they had no case. They were well aware that they were giving away technology, but they had no choice, it was too late. Their claims were dismissed because: "Xerox's complaints were inappropriate for a variety of legal reasons," Amazing you're calling me a liar fanboy.
@johnmonk66 I can't link you to the new york times article that explains the case but:
"Walker dismissed two counts relating to Xerox's efforts to get Apple's copyright declared invalid, apparently agreeing with Apple that the proper place for such an action would be the Copyright Office, not the courts. He also dismissed three counts relating to the unfair competition assertions, saying that the lawsuit should really be a copyright infringement case, not an unfair competition case"
@jwd0808 Apple didn't steal it, they payed a couple of million dollars for it. They just purchased the "idea" however, refined the GUI and brought it to market.
@johnmonk66 Xerox didn't think it was valuable, but once they saw it in action they realized their mistake, and wanted more money. Apple won the lawsuit because of the payment. (4more info wikipedia xerox alto)
Apple didn't pay xerox exactly, they gave xerox 100,000 pre IPO shares of apple stock. when apple went public it was trading at $35 a share. So 3.5 million dollars. If xerox kept those stocks(split 5x)= 3.2 million shares. It would be worth 768 million dollars today.
No, Apple won the lawsuit because too much time had passed, the statute of limitations had run out. Unlike how they lost the lawsuit with Windows because they sold Windows their rights.
@johnmonk66 Because they were tools who realised they had lost a lot of money by selling a technology with massive potential. They lost the case. Anyone can sue fucking ANYONE.
This has been flagged as spam show
Need to marry you Be Naughty girls benaughtyman.info
kristincoyn 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
go and meet bbw ask them what they need just now naneedj.info
siththee 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Be Naughty lady Travel around the world benaughtyman.info
brtnterrell863 1 year ago
bill gates own
the master bill
capitaobrena 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Breaking your habit naughty women benaughtyman.info
gjhjghbghjg 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Be Naughty with people near you benaughtyman.info
xzbzsdhfhnds 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Are you interesting to meat hot Asian beauties lushfmlk.info
moransylvia 1 year ago
Success your life with Asian women **lushfmlk.info**
TASIARAYESkl 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Holiday dating site
Date a Russian lady gettop5.info aknzl
KARINCATHERINE 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Hot big girls seeking romance online naneedj.info
priscilabrooks 1 year ago
Sexy girls are looking sexy and romantic boys naneedj.info
MrMareyan 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Some birds can not fly in, Asian busizz4me.info
prsankgonjan 1 year ago
Online Russian girls lostlk.info
TaylorEarp 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Trust me I will give you naughty things mworld5.info
TarynViviana 1 year ago
Hey every1, just foud a great website with huge file collection (PC And MAC) Just google For Aries-Films and u will find it. You can also watch youtube video in my channel and see how many great programs they got
freeeeeemusic 1 year ago
hahaha Bill is so nerdy even in his voice. I love it.
Faygo069 1 year ago 2
if gates dont help apple ..they wil be today own by china
sunb0ng 1 year ago
@sunb0ng every mac is made in china
johnmonk66 1 year ago
man 1:05 bill gate rules
imagronuragro 2 years ago 4
lol my favorite part 1:19
KlutchAndJerel 2 years ago
Comment removed
r4scuache 2 years ago
um ok that may be true but. Computers cost more then ipods and zunes. And more people have pcs then macs
meplayvgalot 2 years ago
Comment removed
r4scuache 2 years ago
Ahead of "everyone"? The Commodore Pet out sold Apple, then Microsoft came around and sealed the coffin and Apple has been struggling to keep 10% market share ever since. I don't know about you, but every corporation defines its success by how much it makes - even Apple. Their MP3 players are what saved them and a lot of the R&D seed money came from Microsoft in the form of 150 Million dollars worth of non-voting shares. So next time you listen to your ipod, give MS the respect it deserves.
jwd0808 2 years ago 9
Comment removed
pathammond 11 months ago
@jwd0808 The PET? Do you mean the Vic-20? The Apple 2 was a massive seller, outsold the PET and the TRS-80 in the end. the Lisa v Mac civil war helped big blue gain dominance. Commodore are not a company I would put forward as an example of a great business model, or an example of how to dominate market share. They were ruined by one product (the a600) which neither MS or Apple have managed, despite MS bob, and all the macs from 86-98 :P And MS was forced to buy the shares in a patent dispute.
pathammond 11 months ago
more software. ipods are no more advanced than what else is out at the moment. its just a really good interface.
oh, and their touch screen
kinamod2k 2 years ago
Not everybody - that is just a very ignorant statement. I and millions of others own a Zune. Don't forget it has barely been around since 2006.
jwd0808 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
everyone has an ipod?
no, just the loud annoying hipsters that stand out.
in reality a little over 200 million ipods have sold, however, there are 300+ million people in the US, 1+ billion in China, and countless others elsewhere totalling 6 billion.
and this doesn't count those who have over the years upgraded and kept their old ipods in a drawer somewhere.
and i've seen people with zunes. my grandpa even has one!
bkisme 2 years ago
STEVE IS SO SEXY MY GOD!
DGAGIRL 2 years ago
Comment removed
rtdg612 2 years ago
lol, the ultimate geek. so true. :)
Mairynne 3 years ago 5
fuck me, Bill Gates is the ultimate geek..
utoobjoe 3 years ago 2
bill always maintains his position. i believe he is right and it's just business, it's not a relationship it's steves desire to personalize his business so he can use guilt as a form of control. just my opinion.
FlowerofLife101 3 years ago
100% richous ..its strictly buisness.
SN00PY746 2 years ago
"as far as im concerened the war between apple and MS is over" - wait what about MAC VS PC GUY? lol...
Mercury888 3 years ago 9
iPod/Zune
Safari/IE
OSX/VISTA
iTunes/WMP
times change
Hammermememer 3 years ago 4
steve is hot!
pspsamuel9371 3 years ago
03:02 -> Bill's disappointed...
But he WAS Apple's 'true' date as the hands of time have decided.
PenaltyKillah 3 years ago 3
nobody cares about the other two CEOs
indolentlee 3 years ago
And yes, every Mac Office edition has been better than its Windows equivalent. Even the version numbers proves it. Mac 98 after 97, ver. X (released 2001) after 2000, office:mac (2004) after 2003, and now 2008 after 2007!
PenaltyKillah 4 years ago 3
need facts, srykthxbai
szolDat 3 years ago
srykthxbai = Sorry OK Thanks Bye?
I just noticed that a little more features would be included in the Mac equivalent.
PenaltyKillah 3 years ago
Once more I'll repharse what I meant... the next Mac version after the Windows one is like an improved version of the former. The repeating patterns, such as the Mac version being released a year after, with similar features to the last, etc.
Correction:
Office 98 after 97, 2001 after 2000, ver. X (2002) after XP (2001), office:mac (2004) after 2003, and now 2008 after Office 2007.
PenaltyKillah 3 years ago
Ha, Gates was once an anorexic kid...
02:53 -> Black Apple! I thought that was invented last year!
Like it or not, Gates was a major contributor in the development of the Macintosh, and Microsoft Office (originally for the Mac).
PenaltyKillah 4 years ago
Yes, then MS stole, modded, and published their own version to Mac OS, called Windows.
elcaifo 3 years ago
Not the framework, but definitely the interface.
PenaltyKillah 3 years ago
No, they both stole from Xerox.
jwd0808 2 years ago
as far as I know, Apple made an arrangement with Xerox to publish the GUI technology, because they were not interested on it.
Microsoft STOLE the whole idea from the Mac prototypes. Why do you guys qualify my comments as negative? That was extensively DOCUMENTED, and there were a long trial about that.
elcaifo 2 years ago
@elcaifo your comments are negative becuase you state a known lie, Xerox didn't gibe apple anything, which is why XEROX SUED APPLE FOR STEALING THEIR GUI
johnmonk66 1 year ago
@johnmonk66 Wrong, Xerox tried to sue Apple for stealing it, but because they had BOUGHT it, they couldn't. Contrast this with something like Windows where rather than BUYING the gui, MS developers STOLE the design.
pathammond 11 months ago
@pathammond LIAR, apple never bought anything of xerox, xerox lost the case because time ran out, unlike apple lost its case because they were wrong. go suck steve jobs dick, you are such a fucking slave
johnmonk66 11 months ago
Comment removed
pathammond 11 months ago
@johnmonk66 I think you need to calm down. Xerox ran out of time because they had no case. They were well aware that they were giving away technology, but they had no choice, it was too late. Their claims were dismissed because: "Xerox's complaints were inappropriate for a variety of legal reasons," Amazing you're calling me a liar fanboy.
pathammond 11 months ago
@johnmonk66 I can't link you to the new york times article that explains the case but:
"Walker dismissed two counts relating to Xerox's efforts to get Apple's copyright declared invalid, apparently agreeing with Apple that the proper place for such an action would be the Copyright Office, not the courts. He also dismissed three counts relating to the unfair competition assertions, saying that the lawsuit should really be a copyright infringement case, not an unfair competition case"
pathammond 11 months ago
@pathammond Thank you for PROVING Apple stole Xerox's copywright
johnmonk66 11 months ago
@johnmonk66 Learn to spell. I gave PROOF that you are talking out your ass, stupid fucking troll.
pathammond 11 months ago
@pathammond thanks for PROVING apple stole from xerox
johnmonk66 11 months ago
@johnmonk66 Way to repeat yourself. Repetition, fools best friend. Bye now.
pathammond 11 months ago
@pathammond Thanks for proving apple stole from xerox
johnmonk66 11 months ago
@jwd0808 Apple didn't steal it, they payed a couple of million dollars for it. They just purchased the "idea" however, refined the GUI and brought it to market.
BrontesMuse 1 year ago
@BrontesMuse then why did XEROX SUE THEM FOR STEALING IT?
johnmonk66 1 year ago
@johnmonk66 Xerox didn't think it was valuable, but once they saw it in action they realized their mistake, and wanted more money. Apple won the lawsuit because of the payment. (4more info wikipedia xerox alto)
Apple didn't pay xerox exactly, they gave xerox 100,000 pre IPO shares of apple stock. when apple went public it was trading at $35 a share. So 3.5 million dollars. If xerox kept those stocks(split 5x)= 3.2 million shares. It would be worth 768 million dollars today.
BrontesMuse 1 year ago
No, Apple won the lawsuit because too much time had passed, the statute of limitations had run out. Unlike how they lost the lawsuit with Windows because they sold Windows their rights.
johnmonk66 1 year ago
@johnmonk66 Because they were tools who realised they had lost a lot of money by selling a technology with massive potential. They lost the case. Anyone can sue fucking ANYONE.
pathammond 11 months ago
@pathammond Yes, anyone can sue, like when apple sued windows and LOST.
johnmonk66 11 months ago
@johnmonk66 Yup they did, so what exactly was your point again? Oh yeah, you don't have one, fanboy
I love Microsoft, Apple and of course above all, Richard Stallman and Linus Torvalds, because I love COMPUTERS and OPERATING SYSTEMS. Not COMPANIES.
pathammond 11 months ago
Too bad Apple never did become the 3rd milestone. More like the alternative, expensive milestone.
PenaltyKillah 4 years ago
Where can I get a copy of that magazine?
bonklives 4 years ago
steve jobs looks great! handsome!
klongiklongi 4 years ago
Bill Gates hates Steve Jobs, Steve Jobs hates Bill Gates. These mother fuckers are still crazy.
BmoreG4real 4 years ago
Actually, Bill Gates and Steve Jobs are great friends when they aren't competing with each other with Steve's Mac and Bill's PC.
MoldyDux 4 years ago
wtf was bill doin at 02:39 lol he was playin with his hair
Carloz790 4 years ago
Haha, look at Bill. xD
jalland 4 years ago
Hah. Very cheesy dating game setup. Funny that only Microsoft of those 3 "contestants" is still around on its own.
tomismusic 4 years ago
It just goes to show you which "contestant" was willing to do *anything* to win.
HatMan256 4 years ago
Oh come on, they didn't show any other contestant. Bill Gates stood out because they edited the others out.
millerhighlife06 4 years ago